Search

Introduction: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important treatment modality that is used in combination with chemotherapy in many stem cell transplantation protocols. Therefore, the quality of the irradiation is important. Two techniques for planning and delivering TBI are presented and compared. Methods and materials: The technique named ExIMRT is a combination of manually shaped conventional fields from an extended SSD and isocentric IMRT fields. The technique named ExVMAT is a combination of conventional and IMRT fields from an extended SSD and isocentric VMAT fields. Dosimetric data from 32 patients who were planned and treated according to one of the two techniques were compared. Results: When comparing the two techniques, it is determined that the ExVMAT technique is able to significantly reduce the mean total volume overdosed by 120% from 408 to 12 cm3. The dose covering 98% of the total lung volume is significantly increased by this technique from a mean of 9.7 Gy to 10.3 Gy. Additionally, the dose covering 2% of the total kidney volume is significantly decreased from a mean of 12.8 to 12.5 Gy. Furthermore, the population-based variance of the median dose to the total lung volume, the heart and the volume of the body prescribed to 12.5 Gy is significantly reduced. The results are obtained without compromising overall treatment quality as treatment time or dose rate to the lungs. Conclusion: Using the ExVMAT technique, a superior dose distribution can be delivered both from a patient and a population perspective compared to the ExIMRT technique.

The magnetic field in magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) delivery systems influences charged-particle trajectories and hence the three-dimensional (3D) radiation dose distributions. This study investigated the dose-response as well as dose-rate and fractionation dependencies of silicone-based 3D radiochromic dosimeters for photon irradiation in a magnetic field using a 0.35 T MRgRT system. We found a linear dose response up to 22.6 Gy and no significant dose-rate dependency as a function of depth. A difference in optical response was observed for dosimeters irradiated in a single compared to multiple fractions. The dosimeter showed clinical potential for verification of MRgRT delivery.

Intrafractional motion and deformation influence proton therapy delivery for tumours in the thorax, abdomen and pelvis. This study aimed to test the dose–response of a compressively strained three-dimensional silicone-based radiochromic dosimeter during proton beam delivery. The dosimeter was read-out in its relaxed state using optical computed tomography and calibrated for the linear energy transfer, based on Monte Carlo simulations. A three-dimensional gamma analysis showed a 99.3% pass rate for 3%/3 mm and 93.9% for 2%/2 mm, for five superimposed measurements using deformation-including Monte Carlo dose calculations as reference. We conclude that the dosimeter’s dose–response is unaffected by deformations.

Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) is a known but under-acknowledged late effect of pelvic radiotherapy. In rectal cancer, studies describing incidence of PIF and relation to dose volume relationships are lacking. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse dose volume histograms (DVH) from pelvic bones in patients with and without PIF, and (ii) to determine bone sparing capacity of 2 and 3 arc volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Material and methods: Patients treated with CRT for primary rectal cancer underwent a 3-year pelvic MRI for identification of PIFs. Bone structures were retrospectively delineated, and DVHs were re-calculated. Comparative planning was done with 2 (original) and 3 arc VMAT, fixed field IMRT and PBT plans. Results: 27 patients (18 men, mean age 64 years) were included and PIFs were identified in 9 (33%), most (n = 6) had multiple fracture sites. In general, patients with PIFs received higher doses to pelvic bones, and V30 Gy to the sacroiliac joint was non-significantly higher in patients with PIF 68.5% (60.1–69.3 IQR) vs. 56% (54.1–66.6 IQR), p = 0.064. Comparative planning showed that especially 3 arc VMAT and proton beam therapy could be optimized for bone. Conclusions: Patients, treated with VMAT based CRT for rectal cancer, have high rates of PIFs after 3 years. Patients with PIFs tended to have received higher doses to sacroiliac joints. Comparative planning demonstrated most pronounced bone sparing capacity of 3 arc VMAT and with PBT having the potential to further lower doses. These results should be validated in larger and preferably prospective cohorts. Keywords: Rectal cancer, Radiotherapy, Insufficiency fracture, VMAT, IMRT, Proton

Background and purpose: Image-Guidance decreases set-up uncertainties, which may allow for Planning Target Volume (PTV) margins reduction. This study evaluates the robustness of the elective lymph node target coverage to translational and rotational set-up errors in combination with shrinking PTV margins and determines the gain for the Organs At Risk (OARs). Material and methods: Ten cervix cancer patients who underwent external beam radiotherapy with 45 Gy/25Fx were analysed. Daily Image-Guidance was based on bony registration of Cone Beam CT (CBCT) to planning CT (pCT) and daily couch correction (translation and yaw). On each pCT, four Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy dose-plans were generated with PTV margins of 0, 3, 5 and 8 mm. The elective clinical target volume (CTV-E) was propagated from daily CBCTs to the pCT to evaluate daily CTV-E dose. Additional systematic translational isocenter shifts of 2 mm were simulated. D98% (dose received by 98% of the volume of interest) and D99.9% were extracted from each CTV-E for all dose-plans and scenarios. Total dose was accumulated by Dose-Volume Histogram addition. The dosimetric impact of PTV margin reduction on the OARs was evaluated through V30Gy (volume included within the 30 Gy isodose), V40Gy and body V43Gy. Results: When decreasing the PTV margin from 5 to 0 mm, bowel V30Gy was decreased by 13% (from 247 cm3 to 214 cm3), body V43Gy by 19% (from 1462 cm3 to 1188 cm3) and PTV by 39% (from 1416 to 870 cm3). The dosimetric impact of combined systematic shifts and residual rotations on the elective target with a 0 mm PTV margin was a decrease of D98% (mean ± SD) from 44.1 Gy ± 0.4 Gy to 43.7 Gy ± 0.8 Gy and a minimum of 42.4 Gy. Conclusion: PTV margin reduction from 5 to 0 mm induced significant OARs dosimetric gains while elective target coverage remained robust to positioning uncertainties. Keywords: Image-guidance, PTV margins, Elective target, Positioning uncertainties, Dosimetric variations

Background and purpose: Proton therapy (PT) of extra-cranial tumour sites is challenged by density changes caused by inter-fractional organ motion. In this study we investigate on-line dose-guided PT (DGPT) to account inter-fractional target motion, exemplified by internal motion in the pelvis. Materials and methods: On-line DGPT involved re-calculating dose distributions with the isocenter shifted up to 15 mm from the position corresponding to conventional soft-tissue based image-guided PT (IGPT). The method was applied to patient models with simulated prostate/seminal vesicle target motion of ±3, ±5 and ±10 mm along the three cardinal axes. Treatment plans were created using either two lateral (gantry angles of 90°/270°) or two lateral oblique fields (gantry angles of 35°/325°). Target coverage and normal tissue doses from DGPT were compared to both soft-tissue and bony anatomy based IGPT. Results: DGPT improved the dose distributions relative to soft-tissue based IGPT for 39 of 90 simulation scenarios using lateral fields and for 50 of 90 scenarios using lateral oblique fields. The greatest benefits of DGPT were seen for large motion, e.g. a median target coverage improvement of 13% was found for 10 mm anterior motion with lateral fields. DGPT also improved the dose distribution in comparison to bony anatomy IGPT in all cases. The best strategy was often to move the fields back towards the original target position prior to the simulated target motion. Conclusion: DGPT has the potential to better account for large inter-fractional organ motion in the pelvis than IGPT.

Background and purpose: Stopping-power ratios (SPRs) are used in particle therapy to calculate particle range in patients. The heuristic CT-to-SPR conversion (Hounsfield Look-Up-Table, HLUT), needed for treatment planning, depends on CT-scan and reconstruction parameters as well as the specific HLUT definition. To assess inter-centre differences in these parameters, we performed a survey-based qualitative evaluation, as a first step towards better standardisation of CT-based SPR derivation. Materials and methods: A questionnaire was sent to twelve particle therapy centres (ten from Europe and two from USA). It asked for details on CT scanners, image acquisition and reconstruction, definition of the HLUT, body-region specific HLUT selection, investigations of beam-hardening and experimental validations of the HLUT. Technological improvements were rated regarding their potential to improve SPR accuracy. Results: Scan parameters and HLUT definition varied widely. Either the stoichiometric method (eight centres) or a tissue-substitute-only HLUT definition (three centres) was used. One centre combined both methods. The number of HLUT line segments varied widely between two and eleven. Nine centres had investigated influence of beam-hardening, often including patient-size dependence. Ten centres had validated their HLUT experimentally, with very different validation schemes. Most centres deemed dual-energy CT promising for improving SPR accuracy. Conclusions: Large inter-centre variability was found in implementation of CT scans, image reconstruction and especially in specification of the CT-to-SPR conversion. A future standardisation would reduce time-intensive institution-specific efforts and variations in treatment quality. Due to the interdependency of multiple parameters, no conclusion can be drawn on the derived SPR accuracy and its inter-centre variability. Keywords: Particle treatment planning, Hounsfield look-up-table, CT scan protocol, Stopping-power ratio prediction, Inter-centre comparison, Dual-energy CT

Background and purpose: Focal tumour boosting is currently explored in radiotherapy of prostate cancer to increase tumour control. In this study we applied dose response models for both tumour control and normal tissue complications to explore the benefit of proton therapy (PT) combined with focal tumour boosting, also when accounting for inter-fractional motion. Materials and methods: CT scans of seven patients fused with MRI-based index volumes were used. Two volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for each patient; one with conventional dose (77 Gy) to the entire prostate, and one with an additional integrated boost (total dose of 95 Gy) to the index lesion. Two corresponding intensity modulated PT (IMPT) plans were created using two lateral opposing spot scanning beams. All plans were evaluated using an MRI-based tumour control probability (TCP) model and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for the rectum and bladder. Plan robustness was evaluated using dose re-calculations on repeat cone-beam CTs. Results: Across all plans, median TCP increased from 86% (range: 59–98%) without boost to 97% (range: 96–99%) with boost. IMPT plans had lower rectum NTCPs (e.g. 3% vs. 4% for boost plans) but higher bladder NTCPs (20% vs. 18% for boost plans), yet only the bladder NTCPs remained different in the cone beam CT-based re-calculations. Conclusions: Focal tumour boosting can be delivered with either VMAT or protons, and increases the predicted TCP. The small benefit of IMPT when assessing the planned dose distributions was lost when accounting for inter-fractional motion.