1. A case of a distinct difference between the measured blood ethanol concentration and the concentration estimated by Widmark's equation
- Author
-
Annette Thierauf, Jörg Eschbach, Jürgen Kempf, Wolfgang Weinmann, Heike Gnann, and Volker Auwärter
- Subjects
Ethanol ,Chromatography ,biology ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,Body water ,Forensic toxicology ,Poison control ,Blood ethanol ,law.invention ,Toxicology ,Issues, ethics and legal aspects ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,chemistry ,law ,biology.protein ,Flame ionization detector ,Medicine ,Older people ,business ,Law ,Alcohol dehydrogenase - Abstract
In the last century, several mathematical models have been developed to calculate blood ethanol concentrations (BAC) from the amount of ingested ethanol and vice versa. The most common one in the field of forensic sciences is Widmark's equation. A drinking experiment with 10 voluntary test persons was performed with a target BAC of 1.2 g/kg estimated using Widmark's equation as well as Watson's factor. The ethanol concentrations in the blood were measured using headspace gas chromatography/flame ionization and additionally with an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)-based method. In a healthy 75-year-old man a distinct discrepancy between the intended and the determined blood ethanol concentration was observed. A blood ethanol concentration of 1.83 g/kg was measured and the man showed signs of intoxication. A possible explanation for the discrepancy is a reduction of the total body water content in older people. The incident showed that caution is advised when using the different mathematical models in aged people. When estimating ethanol concentrations, caution is recommended with calculated results due to potential discrepancies between mathematical models and biological systems.
- Published
- 2012