Search

HIV-1 encodes several accessory proteins—Nef, Vif, Vpr, and Vpu—whose functions are to modulate the cellular environment to favor immune evasion and viral replication. While Vpr was shown to mediate a G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and provide a replicative advantage during infection of myeloid cells, the mechanisms underlying these functions remain unclear. In this study, we defined HIV-1 Vpr proximity interaction network using the BioID proximity labeling approach and identified 352 potential Vpr partners/targets, including several complexes, such as the cell cycle-regulatory anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Herein, we demonstrate that both the wild type and cell cycle-defective mutants of Vpr induce the degradation of APC1, an essential APC/C scaffolding protein, and show that this activity relies on the recruitment of DCAF1 by Vpr and the presence of a functional proteasome. Vpr forms a complex with APC1, and the APC/C coactivators Cdh1 and Cdc20 are associated with these complexes. Interestingly, we found that Vpr encoded by the prototypic HIV-1 NL4.3 does not interact efficiently with APC1 and is unable to mediate its degradation as a result of a N28S-G41N amino acid substitution. In contrast, we show that APC1 degradation is a conserved feature of several primary Vpr variants from transmitted/founder virus. Functionally, Vpr-mediated APC1 degradation did not impact the ability of the protein to induce a G(2) cell cycle arrest during infection of CD4(+) T cells or enhance HIV-1 replication in macrophages, suggesting that this conserved activity may be important for other aspects of HIV-1 pathogenesis. IMPORTANCE The function of the Vpr accessory protein during HIV-1 infection remains poorly defined. Several cellular targets of Vpr were previously identified, but their individual degradation does not fully explain the ability of Vpr to impair the cell cycle or promote HIV-1 replication in macrophages. Here, we used the unbiased proximity labeling approach, called BioID, to further define the Vpr proximity interaction network and identified several potentially new Vpr partners/targets. We validated our approach by focusing on a cell cycle master regulator, the APC/C complex, and demonstrated that Vpr mediated the degradation of a critical scaffolding component of APC/C called APC1. Furthermore, we showed that targeting of APC/C by Vpr did not impact the known activity of Vpr. Since degradation of APC1 is a conserved feature of several primary variants of Vpr, it is likely that the interplay between Vpr and APC/C governs other aspects of HIV-1 pathogenesis.

Viruses exploit the host cell machinery for their own profit. To evade innate immune sensing and promote viral replication, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subverts DNA repair regulatory proteins and induces G2/M arrest. The preintegration complex of HIV-1 is known to traffic along microtubules and accumulate near the microtubule-organizing center. The centrosome is the major microtubule-organizing center in most eukaryotic cells, but precisely how HIV-1 impinges on centrosome biology remains poorly understood. We report here that the HIV-1 accessory protein viral protein R (Vpr) localized to the centrosome through binding to DCAF1, forming a complex with the ubiquitin ligase EDD-DYRK2-DDB1DCAF1 and Cep78, a resident centrosomal protein previously shown to inhibit EDD-DYRK2-DDB1DCAF1. Vpr did not affect ubiquitination of Cep78. Rather, it enhanced ubiquitination of an EDD-DYRK2-DDB1DCAF1 substrate, CP110, leading to its degradation, an effect that could be overcome by Cep78 expression. The down-regulation of CP110 and elongation of centrioles provoked by Vpr were independent of G2/M arrest. Infection of T lymphocytes with HIV-1, but not with HIV-1 lacking Vpr, promoted CP110 degradation and centriole elongation. Elongated centrioles recruited more γ-tubulin to the centrosome, resulting in increased microtubule nucleation. Our results suggest that Vpr is targeted to the centrosome where it hijacks a ubiquitin ligase, disrupting organelle homeostasis, which may contribute to HIV-1 pathogenesis.

Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection of monocyte/macrophages is modulated by the levels of entry receptors cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), as well as by host antiviral restriction factors, which mediate several post-entry blocks. We recently identified two microRNAs, miR-221 and miR-222, which limit HIV-1 entry during infection of monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) by down-regulating CD4 expression. Interestingly, CD4 is also down-regulated during the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. In this study, we compared microRNA expression profiles in primary monocytes and macrophages by RNAseq and found that miR-221/miR-222 are enhanced in macrophages. We took advantage of the monocytic THP-1 cell line that, once differentiated, is poorly susceptible to HIV-1. Accordingly, we found that CD4 levels are very low in THP-1 differentiated cells and that this down-regulation of the virus receptor is the result of miR-221/miR-222 up-regulation during differentiation. We thus established a THP-1 cell line stably expressing a modified CD4 (THP-1-CD4R) that is not modulated by miR-221/miR-222. We show that in contrast to parental THP-1, this line is productively infected by HIV-1 following differentiation, sustaining efficient HIV-1 CD4-dependent replication and spread. This new THP-1-CD4R cell line represents a useful tool for the study of HIV-1-macrophage interactions particularly in contexts where spreading of viral infection is necessary.

Viruses exploit the host cell machinery for their own profit. To evade innate immune sensing and promote viral replication, HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subverts DNA repair regulatory proteins and induces G(2)/M arrest. The preintegration complex of HIV-1 is known to traffic along microtubules and accumulate near the microtubule-organizing center. The centrosome is the major microtubule-organizing center in most eukaryotic cells, but precisely how HIV-1 impinges on centrosome biology remains poorly understood. We report here that the HIV-1 accessory protein viral protein R (Vpr) localized to the centrosome through binding to DCAF1, forming a complex with the ubiquitin ligase EDD-DYRK2-DDB1(DCAF1) and Cep78, a resident centrosomal protein previously shown to inhibit EDD-DYRK2-DDB1(DCAF1). Vpr did not affect ubiquitination of Cep78. Rather, it enhanced ubiquitination of an EDD-DYRK2-DDB1(DCAF1) substrate, CP110, leading to its degradation, an effect that could be overcome by Cep78 expression. The down-regulation of CP110 and elongation of centrioles provoked by Vpr were independent of G(2)/M arrest. Infection of T lymphocytes with HIV-1, but not with HIV-1 lacking Vpr, promoted CP110 degradation and centriole elongation. Elongated centrioles recruited more γ-tubulin to the centrosome, resulting in increased microtubule nucleation. Our results suggest that Vpr is targeted to the centrosome where it hijacks a ubiquitin ligase, disrupting organelle homeostasis, which may contribute to HIV-1 pathogenesis.

Background Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most important pathogens in the swine industry and causes important economic losses. No effective antiviral drugs against it are commercially available. We recently reported that the culture supernatant of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, the porcine pleuropneumonia causative agent, has an antiviral activity in vitro against PRRSV in SJPL cells. Objectives of this study were (i) to identify the mechanism behind the antiviral activity displayed by A. pleuropneumoniae and (ii) to characterize the active molecules present in the bacterial culture supernatant. Methods Antibody microarray analysis was used in order to point out cellular pathways modulated by the A. pleuropneumoniae supernatant. Subsequent, flow cytometry analysis and cell cycle inhibitors were used to confirm antibody microarray data and to link them to the antiviral activity of the A. pleuropneumoniae supernatant. Finally, A. pleuropneumoniae supernatant characterization was partially achieved using mass spectrometry. Results Using antibody microarray, we observed modulations in G2/M-phase cell cycle regulation pathway when SJPL cells were treated with A. pleuropneumoniae culture supernatant. These modulations were confirmed by a cell cycle arrest at the G2/M-phase when cells were treated with the A. pleuropneumoniae culture supernatant. Furthermore, two G2/M-phase cell cycle inhibitors demonstrated the ability to inhibit PRRSV infection, indicating a potential key role for PRRSV infection. Finally, mass spectrometry lead to identify two molecules (m/z 515.2 and m/z 663.6) present only in the culture supernatant. Conclusions We demonstrated for the first time that A. pleuropneumoniae is able to disrupt SJPL cell cycle resulting in inhibitory activity against PRRSV. Furthermore, two putative molecules were identified from the culture supernatant. This study highlighted the cell cycle importance for PRRSV and will allow the development of new prophylactic or therapeutic approaches against PRRSV. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12985-015-0404-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.