122 results on '"Järhult B"'
Search Results
2. Slutreplik om nätläkare, Åke Thörn med flera: - Rosen är det enskilda mötet.
3. [Total "make-over" threatens the medical profession].
4. [Karolinska Institutet's change of view on value-based care is welcome, but is the correct conclusion drawn? – Research is central when new ideas about organization are presented].
5. [Ilmar Reepalus insight should delight the Medical Association].
6. [Withheld conflict of interest should lead to suspension from publication in Läkartidningen].
7. [The Swedish Medical Association should take action against PaRIS – for competence and medical ethics].
8. [Should value-based care be introduced by consultants without scientific evidence?].
9. [Value-based care without basis].
10. [Value-based care is implemented quickly – worthy successor to NPM?].
11. [The report "Efficient Care" lacks focus in the proposals].
12. [Simplified checklists compromises primary health care].
13. [Certainly there are problems with NPM].
14. [Final reply, quality registries: Time to discuss the core of science and quality criteria].
15. [Time for a renewed discussion about the role of the quality registries].
16. [Lack of information can make the patient a felon].
17. [Value-based health care just as bad as New public management].
18. ["Appoint a Swedish Neuberger commission"].
19. [Registration of patient data. "Active refusal" the way in England].
20. [7 suggestions].
21. [Ethics versus New Public Management].
22. [We must come to terms with our contemporary history].
23. [After Maciej Zarembas series of articles in Dagens Nyheter: Appoint a health care future commission].
24. [A Cochrane report on open comparisons. The core of medicine is pushed away].
25. [Replica of testosterone campaign: Stop being a megaphone for Bayer].
26. [An attempt to introduce testosterone to healthy men. A shameful campaign].
27. [Learning from Norway].
28. [Set up a shadow investigation!].
29. [No ban to connect registries to economic control].
30. [National registry database shakes the reliance].
31. [Critical questions are missing in the inspection of the national quality registries].
32. [The content of Lakartidningen and journalistic principles].
33. [A decent proposal].
34. [Summary of the debate on quality registries: "The registry industry undermines the art of medicine"].
35. [Incitament and bonus systems lead in the wrong direction].
36. [Evidence-base the quality registries!].
37. [Registry enthusiasts must step forward and take their responsibility].
38. [Can quality registry evaluate the quality of care?].
39. [Every error counts when general practitioners report on the web].
40. [Hospital mortality a bad indicator of patient safety in health care].
41. [All patients' right to complete information--dilemma of health care services. No support by the law concerning mentally incompetent patients].
42. [Good bye to the comprehensive view when risk capitalists own the physicians].
43. [Increased accessibility--for whom?].
44. [Should apolipoproteins be the first choice in routine health care?].
45. [Market solutions favour demand not needs].
46. [Heart infarction registry or the art of medicine--can they be united?].
47. [Towards an expensive, discriminating health care system].
48. [Difficult ethics of prevention a challenge to the medical profession. Chasing risk factors can result in "health dictatorship"].
49. [Final reply on the introduction of apolipoprotein determination in Jonkoping: need of ethical platform in the county council].
50. [Apolipoprotein determination was introduced without contribution of general practitioners--why?].
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.