Search

Background Cardiac troponin I and T are both used for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), also known as type 5 MI (MI-5). Different MI-5 definitions have been formulated, using multiples of the 99th percentile upper reference limit (10×, 35×, or 70× URL), with or without supporting evidence. These definitions are arbitrarily chosen based on conventional assays and do not differentiate between troponin I and T. We therefore investigated the kinetics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) and T (hs-cTnT) following CABG. Methods A systematic search was applied to MEDLINE and EMBASE databases including the search terms “coronary artery bypass grafting” AND “high-sensitivity cardiac troponin.” Studies reporting hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT on at least 2 different time points were included. Troponin concentrations were extracted and normalized to the assay-specific URL. Results For hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT, 17 (n = 1661 patients) and 15 studies (n = 2646 patients) were included, respectively. Preoperative hs-cTnI was 6.1× URL (95% confidence intervals: 4.9–7.2) and hs-cTnT 1.2× URL (0.9–1.4). Mean peak was reached 6–8 h postoperatively (126× URL, 99–153 and 45× URL, 29–61, respectively). Subanalysis of hs-cTnI illustrated assay-specific peak heights and kinetics, while subanalysis of surgical strategies revealed 3-fold higher hs-cTnI than hs-cTnT for on-pump CABG and 5-fold for off-pump CABG. Conclusion Postoperative hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT following CABG surpass most current diagnostic cutoff values. hs-cTnI was almost 3-fold higher than hs-cTnT, and appeared to be highly dependent on the assay used and surgical strategy. There is a need for assay-specific hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT cutoff values for accurate, timely identification of MI-5.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care management for TBI patients aims to prevent secondary cerebral damage. Targeted temperature management is one option to prevent cerebral damage, as hypothermia may have protective effects. By conducting a systematic literature review, we evaluated (1) the presence of a temperature difference (gradient) between brain temperature (Tb) and core temperature (Tc) in TBI patients and (2) clinical factors associated with reported differences. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The PubMed database was systematically searched using MESH terms and keywords, and Web of Sciences was assessed for additional article citations. We included studies that continuously and simultaneously measured Tb and Tc in severe TBI patients. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies was modified to fit the purpose of our study. Statistical data were extracted for further meta-analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 16 studies, with a total of 480 patients. Clinical heterogeneity consisted of Tb/Tc measurement site, measurement device, physiological changes, local protocols, and medical or surgical interventions. The studies have a high statistical heterogeneity (I2). The pooled mean temperature gradient between Tb and Tc was +0.14 °C (95% confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.24) and ranged from -1.29 to +1.1 °C. Patients who underwent a decompressive (hemi)craniectomy showed lower Tb values compared to Tc found in three studies. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on Tb and Tc are heterogeneous and show that, on average, Tb and Tc are not clinically significant different in TBI patients (