1. Evaluation of infrared technology to detect category I and suspected deep tissue injury in hospitalised patients
- Author
-
Ivy Hui Qi Goh, Shin Yuh Ang, Xin Ping Ng, Andrea Chaeu Lin Choh, Fazila Aloweni, Kai Yunn Teo, Yee Yee Chang, and Siew Hoon Lim
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Nursing (miscellaneous) ,Infrared Rays ,Skin Pigmentation ,Intact skin ,030207 dermatology & venereal diseases ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Deep tissue ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Pressure Ulcer ,030504 nursing ,Pressure injury ,business.industry ,Sacrococcygeal Region ,Skin temperature ,Middle Aged ,Hospitalization ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Regional Blood Flow ,Thermography ,Fundamentals and skills ,Female ,Heel ,Radiology ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Skin Temperature - Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of an infrared thermography device in assessing skin temperature among category I pressure ulcer (PU) and/or suspected deep tissue injuries (SDTI) with intact skin. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study design was used. Adult inpatients (cases) who had a category I PU or suspected deep tissue injury (skin intact) on the sacral or heel during the study period (March to April 2018) were recruited. Patients without a PU were also recruited to act as control. Thermal images of the patient's PU site and non-PU site were taken within 24 hours of PU occurrence. Thermal images of the control patients (no PU) were also taken. Each PU case was matched to three control patients in terms of age, gender, race and anatomical sites. All thermal images were taken using a portable CAT S60 Thermal Imaging Rugged Smartphone (Caterpillar Inc., US) that provided readings of the skin temperature in degrees Celsius. Results: A total of 17 cases and 51 controls were recruited. Among the cases, the mean difference in skin temperature between the PU site (mean: 31.14°C; standard deviation [SD]: 1.54) and control site within the cases (mean: 28.93°C; SD: 3.47) was significant (difference: 2.21±3.66°C; p=0·024). When comparing between all cases and controls, the mean temperature difference was non-significant. When comparing between the category I PU and suspected deep pressure injury cases, the mean difference was also non-significant. Conclusion: Using infrared thermography technology at the bedside to measure skin temperature will support the clinical diagnosis of patients with skin types I to III. However, there is a need for a more accurate and objective measurement to identify and diagnose early category I PU or suspected deep tissue injury in adult patients with darker skin types 4 and above, enabling early initiation of preventive measures in the hospital acute care setting.
- Published
- 2019