Search

The p14(ARF) (ARF) tumour suppressor plays an important role in the cellular response to oncogene activation. In this report, we demonstrate an interaction between ARF and DAXX, a highly conserved protein with identified roles in the regulation of gene expression. HDM2 was shown to interact with each of ARF and DAXX upon upregulation of expression as well as at lower expression levels following transfection of ARF and DAXX. Through immunofluorescence analysis, we observed that endogenous ARF and DAXX colocalize both to nucleoli and to nuclear bodies in cell lines that co-express both proteins. Similar results were obtained upon co-transfection of ARF and DAXX. Co-expression of ARF and DAXX was further found to inhibit ARF-mediated HDM2 sumoylation and to induce sumoylation and ubiquitination of DAXX itself, implicating DAXX as a substrate of ARF-mediated post-translational events. We also observed induction of p53 sumoylation in the presence of ARF and DAXX, an effect that was inhibited by upregulation of HDM2 expression. In summary, we have identified DAXX as a novel ARF binding partner and substrate of ARF-mediated sumoylation and suggest that DAXX acts as a modifier of both p53-dependent and p53-independent ARF function.

Organization of the central nervous system during embryonic development is an intricate process involving a host of molecular players. The Drosophila segmentation genes, sloppy paired (slp) 1/2 have been shown to be necessary for development of a neuronal precursor cell subtype, the NB4-2 cells. Here, we show that slp1/2 also have roles in regulating glial cell fates. Using slp1/2 loss-of-function mutants, we show an increase in glial cell markers, glial cells missing (gcm) and reversed polarity. In contrast, misexpression of either slp1 or slp2 causes downregulation of glial cell-specific genes and alters the fate of glial and neuronal cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Slp1 and its mammalian ortholog, Foxg1, inhibit Gcm transcriptional activity as well as bind Gcm. Taken together, these data show that Slp1/Foxg1 regulate glial cell fates by inhibiting Gcm function., (Copyright 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

PROLIFERATIVE CUES TRIGGER a complex series of molecular signaling events in cells. Early in the cell cycle, cells are faced with an important decision that affects their fate. They either initiate a round of replication or they withdraw from cell division. Passage through the restriction point, or "point of no return," marks cellular commitment to a new round of division. Genetic mutations that predispose individuals to tumorigenesis often affect pathways that influence cellular proliferation. Many of the mutated genes give rise to molecules that are no longer able to appropriately regulate the mammalian cell cycle; the end result is neoplasia. In this review, the critical elements that permit cell cycle progression and the positive and negative regulators that affect the process are reviewed.

The unique INK4A/ARF locus at chromosome 9p21 encodes two distinct proteins that intimately link the pRB and p53 tumour suppressor pathways. p16INK4A has been identified as an inhibitor of the cell cycle, capable of inducing arrest in G1 phase. p14/p19ARF on the other hand can induce both G1 and G2 arrest due to its stabilizing effects on the p53 transcription factor. In addition to their roles in growth arrest, both proteins are involved in cellular senescence and apoptosis. The frequent mutation or deletion of INK4A/ARF in human tumours as well as the occurence of tumours in the murine knockout models have identified both p16 and ARF as bona fide tumour suppressors.

RET is a receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in neuroendocrine cells and in tumors of these cell types. RET activation may be mediated by a ligand complex comprising glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and GDNF family receptor alpha-1 (GFR alpha-1). Activating RET mutations are found in the inherited cancer syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and in a subset of the related sporadic tumors, medullary thyroid carcinoma and pheochromocytoma, both being derived from neuroendocrine tissues. In one small study, mutations were identified in another tumor with neuroendocrine features, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). To determine whether RET mutations contribute to the pathogenesis of SCLC, we examined a panel of 54 SCLC cell lines. No mutations were identified in RET exons 10, 11, and 13-16, regions previously implicated in SCLC or other neuroendocrine tumors. We further examined the expression pattern of RET and the genes encoding the components of its ligand complex GDNF and GFR alpha-1, in 21 SCLC lines by using RT-PCR. Although we found no consistent pattern of expression for these three genes, RET was expressed in 57% of SCLC lines. Thus, although RET mutations appear unlikely to be an important step in the tumorigenesis of SCLC, the frequent expression of this gene suggests that RET may have a mitogenic role in a subset of SCLC cell lines.

The mature mammalian kidney arises through a series of reciprocal inductive interactions between two different cell groups, the ureteric bud epithelium and the metanephric mesenchyme. The RET receptor tyrosine kinase is required for induction and development of the metanephric kidney. Differential splicing at the 3' end of RET results in transcripts encoding three isoforms that differ with respect to their C-terminal 9 (RET9), 51 (RET51) or 43 (RET43) amino acids. In vitro assays have identified differences in the abilities of the RET9 and RET51 isoforms to induce differentiation suggesting functional differences between these proteins. We examined the relative expression levels of the three RET 3' splicing variants in developing human kidney using semi-quantitative RT-PCR. We observed consistent expression of the RET9 and RET43 variants in kidney samples spanning 7.5 through 24 weeks gestation. At early gestational ages (7.5-8.5 weeks), RET51 expression was very low (+/-5%) compared to RET9; however, a rapid seven fold increase in expression was detected by 9 weeks. Our data suggest that RET51 may contribute to differentiation-related events occurring after 8.5 weeks gestation rather than to induction of the human kidney.

A series of inductive events between two different cell groups, the ureteric bud epithelium and metanephric mesenchyme, gives rise to the functional mammalian kidney. These reciprocal inductive interactions involve a number of molecules, one of which is the RET receptor tyrosine kinase. The phenotype of mice lacking functional RET includes kidney agenesis or severe dysgenesis, indicating a requirement for RET in kidney organogenesis. To investigate RET expression in human kidney development, we used a semi-quantitative RT-PCR-based strategy to examine a panel of kidney RNA samples ranging from 8-24 weeks gestational age. We found RET expression was highest earlier in development (14 weeks) with expression decreasing through to 24 weeks gestation. While three alternative RET transcripts generated by exon skipping at the 5' end of the gene were all detected throughout kidney development, expression of one transcript, RET2/6, where exon 2 was spliced to exon 6, varied relative to full length RET during this period. Levels of RET2/6 were highest at the earliest age of fetal kidney examined (8 weeks) and decreased relative to all other RET transcripts to low adult levels. The period of high expression coincides with a period of rapid bud bifurcation. Thus, it is possible that RET2/6 has a role in the early growth and differentiation of the human kidney.

Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a common congenital abnormality characterized by absence of the enteric ganglia in the hind gut. In 10-40% of HSCR cases, mutations of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase have been found. The recent identification of a multimeric RET ligand/receptor complex suggested that mutations of genes encoding other components of this complex might also occur in HSCR. To investigate this role, we examined the gene for glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), the circulating ligand of the RET receptor complex, for mutations in a panel of sporadic and familial HSCR. We identified GDNF sequence variants in 2/36 HSCR patients. The first of these was a conservative change which did not affect the GDNF protein sequence. The second variant was a de novo missense mutation in a family with no history of HSCR and without mutation of the RET gene. Thus, our data are consistent with a causative role for GDNF mutations in some HSCR cases.