Search

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of insomnia. Breast-cancer resistant protein (BCRP) is an efflux pump expressed in intestinal epithelium and hepatocytes, contributing to the absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs and endogenous compounds. In vitro, daridorexant inhibits BCRP with an IC50 of 3.0 μmol/L. The BCRP substrate rosuvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug, recommended for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. In order to exclude an inhibitory effect of daridorexant on BCRP, this single-centre, open-label, two-treatment Phase 1 study investigated the effect of daridorexant at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single-dose rosuvastatin in 20 healthy male subjects. In addition, safety and tolerability were assessed. A single oral dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 1 was followed by 96 hours observation. Thereafter, 25 mg daridorexant was administered once daily (o.d.) on Days 5-8 and in combination with 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 8. On Days 9-12, subjects received 25 mg daridorexant alone. PK sampling was performed up to 120 hours after treatment administration. The results showed that concomitant administration of 25 mg daridorexant o.d. at steady state did not affect the exposure parameters of rosuvastatin in a relevant way, as indicated by the ratios of geometric means (GMRs) ([rosuvastatin + daridorexant]/[rosuvastatin alone]) of 0.93 for both Cmax and AUC0-∞ . Administration of a single dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin, multiple doses of 25 mg daridorexant alone or in combination were well tolerated. Taken together, daridorexant and BCRP substrates can be safely co-administered.

We investigated the hemodynamic effects of 2 short-acting β1 -blockers, landiolol and esmolol, in the continuous presence of dobutamine in a prospective, single-center, randomized, crossover study in 16 healthy White volunteers. Dobutamine was infused at a rate sufficient to increase the heart rate by at least 30 beats per minute, followed by a 60-minute infusion of 50 μg/kg/min esmolol or 10 μg/kg/min landiolol on top of the unchanged dobutamine infusion. Concentrations of β-blockers and their metabolites in blood, heart rate, and blood pressure were followed for 180 minutes. Landiolol reduced the dobutamine-induced heart rate and blood pressure increases better than esmolol. After discontinuation of β-blocker administration, heart rate recovered swiftly to preinfusion values in both study arms. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure recovered partially after landiolol but showed a continued reduction after esmolol. No serious adverse events were observed. The heart rate effect is characteristic for β-blockers, whereas the blood pressure effects are likely due to direct and indirect β-blocker effects as well as influences on various ion channels. This may explain why landiolol that is devoid of effects on renin and sodium, calcium, and potassium channels behaves different from esmolol with respect to blood pressure recovery.

Background and objective This study involved an investigation into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of esmolol in the presence of dobutamine in healthy subjects of European ancestry. Methods We conducted a single-center, prospective randomized study of 16 healthy subjects with each receiving an infusion of dobutamine sufficient to increase heart rate (HR) by 30 beats per minute (bpm) followed by a 60-minute infusion of 50 µg/kg/min esmolol. Pharmacokinetics, HR, and blood pressure were evaluated for 180 minutes. Results In the presence of dobutamine, esmolol elimination was substantially faster than without dobutamine, Esmolol infusion reduced dobutamine-induced elevation of HR reversibly whereas the dobutamine-induced systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction did not recover after the termination of the esmolol infusion. No serious adverse events (AEs) were observed. Conclusions The accelerated elimination of esmolol was likely due to higher cleavage through tissue esterases induced by dobutamine-induced increased tissue passage cycles per time unit. The HR effect was characteristic of a beta-blocker, whereas the blood pressure effect was likely due to a mechanism other than direct beta-blockade. HR remained elevated after the infusion of esmolol and dobutamine, most likely due to persistent blood pressure reduction.

Background To study the pharmacokinetic and -dynamic behavior of landiolol in the presence of dobutamine in healthy subjects of European ancestry. Methods We conducted a single-center, prospective randomized study in 16 healthy subjects each receiving an infusion of dobutamine sufficient to increase heart rate by 30 bpm followed by a 60 min infusion of 10 μg/kg/min landiolol. Results Dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate were stable for at least 20 min before a 60 min landiolol- infusion was started. The dobutamine effects were rapidly antagonized by landiolol within 16 min. A further slight decrease in heart rate during 20–60 min of the landiolol infusion occurred as well. Upon termination of landiolol infusion, heart rate and blood pressure recovered rapidly in response to the persisting dobutamine infusion but did not return to the maximum values before landiolol infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters of landiolol in presence of dobutamine showed a short half-life (3.5 min) and a low distribution volume (0.3 l/kg). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion Landiolol can antagonize the dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate and blood pressure in a fast way. A rapid bradycardic effect until steady-state plasma levels is followed by a slow heart rate reduction. The latter can be attributed to an early desensitization to dobutamine. Consequently, after termination of landiolol, the heart rate did not achieve maximum pre-landiolol values. The pharmacokinetics of landiolol during dobutamine infusion are similar when compared to short- and long-term data in Caucasian subjects. Landiolol in the given dose can thus serve as an antagonist of dobutamine-induced cardiac effects. Trial registration Registration number 2010–023311-34 at the EU Clinical Trials Register, registration date 2010-12-21.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of long-term administration of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective β-blocker, were investigated for the first time in white subjects in a prospective clinical trial. Blood concentrations of landiolol and its metabolites, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and electrocardiogram parameters were studied in 12 healthy volunteers receiving continuous infusions of a new 12-mg/mL formulation of landiolol using a dose-escalation regimen (10 μg/kg BW/min for 2 hours, 20 μg/kg BW/min for 2 hours, 40 μg/kg BW/min for 20 hours, 6 hours follow-up). Landiolol blood concentrations were dose proportional. Time until steady state decreased with increasing doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters were t1/2 = 4.5 minutes, VD = 366 mL/kg, and total body clearance = 53 mL·kg·min. Maximal blood concentrations of the inactive main metabolite M1 were 10-fold higher than those of landiolol, with t1/2 = 126 minutes, VD = 811 mL/kg, and total body clearance = 4.5 mL·kg·min. HR reduction from baseline was fast (significant after 16 minutes) and sustained throughout the administration period. Systolic and diastolic BP reductions and electrocardiogram parameter changes were less pronounced and became significant only occasionally. Recovery after discontinuation of infusion was fast with little (HR) or no (BP) rebound. The new formulation showed excellent local and general tolerability.

Background To date, no data have been reported on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective β1-adrenergic antagonist, in non-Asian subjects. The aim of this study was to compare two landiolol formulations in healthy Caucasian subjects. Materials and methods We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in two cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men) each receiving three doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg BW) of Onoact® 50 Lyophilized powder (50 mg) or Rapibloc® concentrate IV (20 mg/2 mL) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of the two landiolol formulations. Results For both formulations, maximum blood concentrations of landiolol were rapidly reached (median tmax 2.3 ± 0.65 and 2.8 ± 1.13 min for the high dose of each formulation). The compounds had a short half-life (t1/2 = 3.2 ± 1.2 min and 3.0 ± 1.1 min for the low dose of the concentrate formulation and the lyophilized powder, respectively). The results showed no statistically significant differences between both formulations of landiolol for any PK parameters, at study doses. Both formulations dose-dependently and significantly decreased the heart rate values from 62.2 bpm at baseline to minimum values of 55–56, 52–53, and 50–52 bpm after 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg respectively. This bradycardic effect was achieved within 1 to 3 min. The decrease in systolic blood pressure (baseline: 107 mm Hg, minimum values were around 99 mm Hg) was significant but not dose dependent, and occurred within 3 to 12 min. Seven mild to moderate AEs occurred after administration of the concentrate formulation. No SAEs were reported in this study. Conclusion In Caucasians, both landiolol formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic behaviours, displaying very short half-lives (3.0 to 3.6 min). In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent. In summary, both landiolol formulations delivered comparable plasma concentration profiles and showed good local tolerability. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic reactions observed in Caucasians were comparable to those described in Japanese subjects.

Aim The aim of the present study was to explore the effect of hepatic or renal dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics (PK), tolerability and safety of selexipag, an orally active prostacyclin receptor agonist. Methods Two prospective, open-label studies evaluated the PK of selexipag and its active metabolite ACT-333679 in healthy subjects and in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment or severe renal function impairment (SRFI). A single dose of 200 μg or 400 μg was administered. The PK parameters were derived from plasma concentration-time profiles. Results Exposure increased with the severity of hepatic impairment. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) for selexipag and ACT-333679 increased 2.1-fold (1.7-2.6) and 1.2-fold (0.9-1.6) in subjects with mild hepatic impairment, and 4.5-fold (3.4-5.8) and 2.2-fold (1.7-2.8) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment when compared with healthy subjects. The two subjects with severe hepatic impairment showed similar dose-normalized exposure to that of subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. A 1.7-fold increase in the AUC0-∞ of selexipag and ACT-333679 was observed with SRFI compared with healthy subjects. Although exposure to selexipag and/or ACT-333679 was higher in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or SRFI vs. healthy subjects, no safety concerns were raised in these groups. Conclusions Based on these observations, the PK data suggest that the clinically used starting dose needs no adjustments in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or SRFI. However, doses should be up-titrated with caution in these patients. The small number of subjects limits the interpretation of selexipag PK in subjects with severe hepatic impairment.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of long-term administration of esmolol and landiolol, a new fast-acting cardioselective β-blocker, were compared for the first time in Caucasian subjects in a prospective clinical trial. Twelve healthy volunteers received landiolol and esmolol by continuous infusion for 24 hours in a randomized crossover study using a dose-escalation regimen. Blood concentrations of drugs and metabolites, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG parameters, and tolerability were observed for 30 hours and compared. Drug blood concentrations and areas under the curve were dose-proportional. The half life of landiolol (4.5 minutes) was significantly shorter than that of esmolol (6.9 minutes). Volume of distribution and total clearance were lower for landiolol. Heart rate reduction was faster and more pronounced with landiolol and retained throughout the administration period; effects on blood pressure were not different. Landiolol turned out to be superior to esmolol with respect to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and local tolerability.

Macitentan is under development for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patients with PAH may suffer from comorbidities such as renal or hepatic impairment. Two prospective, single-center, open-label studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of macitentan and its metabolites (pharmacologically active ACT-132577 and inactive ACT-373898) in healthy subjects and in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment or severe renal function impairment (SRFI). After administering a single oral dose of 10 mg macitentan the pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC∞) were derived from plasma concentration-time profiles. Exposure to macitentan and ACT-132577 was lower in hepatically impaired versus healthy subjects, with no correlation with the degree of hepatic impairment. Exposure to ACT-373898 was lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment only. Plasma concentration-time profiles for macitentan and ACT-132577 (active) were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with SRFI. AUC∞ of ACT-373898 (inactive) was 7.3-fold higher in subjects with SRFI versus healthy subjects. No safety concerns were raised in either study. Based on these observations, pharmacokinetic alterations of macitentan due to hepatic or renal function impairment are not considered clinically relevant and no dose adjustment is necessary in these patients.

This study aimed to investigate changes of corrected QT (QTc) interval during acute ischemic stroke and its correlation with high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), neurological outcome, and 1-year mortality.We registered electrocardiogram in 69 patients immediately after admission to the intensive care unit and then after 24 and 48 hours. Computed tomography was performed on admission to determine brain infarct size and localization. Neurological outcome was assessed by modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge.Forty-five (65.2%) patients had prolonged QTc at baseline; only 18 (26.1%) patients had prolonged QTc after 48 hours. Baseline QTc was not associated with neurological outcome (P = .27). However, prolonged QTc after 48 hours was associated with worse mRS at discharge (4.5 [4.0-6.0] versus 2.0 [1.0-3.0]; P .0001). Patients who deceased during hospitalization (n = 7 [10.1%]) as compared with survivors had more frequently prolonged QTc after 48 hours (38.9 versus 0%; P .0001), higher level of hsTnI (48.4 [36.1-75.0] versus 8.6 [3.4-26.5]; P = .003), and BNP (334 [224-866] versus 109 [30-190]; P = .014). In univariate analysis, 1-year mortality was associated with prolonged QTc after 48 hours, hsTnI, and BNP. In multivariate analysis, only BNP remained to be associated with 1-year mortality (odds ratio 3.41, 95% confidence interval 1.06-11.03).QTc interval in patients with acute ischemic stroke is a dynamic parameter. Prolonged QTc after 48 hours, but not baseline QTc, correlated with neurological outcome and 1-year mortality. Patients with prolonged QTc had higher level of hsTnI.

Aims Previous studies have demonstrated substantial variability in manual assessment of QRS complex duration (QRSd). Disagreements in QRSd measurements were also found in several automated algorithms tested on digitized electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings. The aim of our study was to investigate the variability of automated QRSd measurements performed by two commercially available electrocardiographs. Methods and results Two GE MAC 5000 (GE-1 and GE-2) electrocardiographs and two Mortara ELI 350 (Mortara-1 and Mortara-2) electrocardiographs were used in the study. Participants for the study were recruited from patients hospitalized in the department of cardiology of a university hospital. Participants underwent up to four recording sessions within a single day with a different electrocardiograph at each session when two to four immediately successive ECG recordings were undertaken. In 76 patients, 683 ECGs were recorded; the mean QRSd was 109.0 ± 26.1 ms. The QRSd difference ≥10 ms between the first and second intra-session ECG was found in 7, 3, 20, and 14% of ECG pairs for GE-1, GE-2, Mortara-1, and Mortara-2, respectively. No inter-session difference in QRSd was found within both manufacturers. In individual patients, Mortara calculated the mean QRSd to be longer by 7.3 ms (95% CI: 6.2–8.5 ms, P < 0.0001) with a 2.1-times (95% CI: 1.9–2.4) greater standard deviation of the mean QRSd (7.1 vs. 3.3 ms, P < 0.001). Conclusion Electrocardiographs from two manufacturers measured QRSd values with a systematic difference and a significantly different level of precision. This may have important clinical implications in selection of suitable candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Macitentan is under development for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patients with PAH may suffer from comorbidities such as renal or hepatic impairment. Two prospective, single-center, open-label studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of macitentan and its metabolites (pharmacologically active ACT-132577 and inactive ACT-373898) in healthy subjects and in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment or severe renal function impairment (SRFI). After administering a single oral dose of 10 mg macitentan the pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC∞) were derived from plasma concentration-time profiles. Exposure to macitentan and ACT-132577 was lower in hepatically impaired versus healthy subjects, with no correlation with the degree of hepatic impairment. Exposure to ACT-373898 was lower in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment only. Plasma concentration-time profiles for macitentan and ACT-132577 (active) were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with SRFI. AUC∞ of ACT-373898 (inactive) was 7.3-fold higher in subjects with SRFI versus healthy subjects. No safety concerns were raised in either study. Based on these observations, pharmacokinetic alterations of macitentan due to hepatic or renal function impairment are not considered clinically relevant and no dose adjustment is necessary in these patients.

In patients with heart failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction and prolonged QRS complex, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a treatment method aimed at restoration of myocardial depolarization synchronicity. However, the extent of clinical and echocardiographic improvement depends on anatomical relations in individual patients, on structural changes in the heart, on intrinsic electrical activation, and on the position of pacing leads. Many parameters of CRT devices may be changed in order to tailor the function of CRT to the needs of a particular patient; the most important among them is AV and VV interval. The largest trials studying CRT used various methods for optimization of these intervals but unequivocal proof of the benefit brought by optimization is still lacking. Many methods were evaluated, most frequently based on echocardiography and intracardiac electrogram interval measurement. However, drawbacks in statistics make the studies of limited value for establishing a reference method or guidance for daily practice. Echocardiography has inherent variability of results and is highly operator dependent. Optimization based on intracardiac electrogram intervals has not proved yet to be of clear benefit above arbitrary AV interval. The most promising method is hemodynamic assessment by finger plethysmography. Measured data are highly reproducible and operator-independentA randomized multicenter double-blind study using finger plethysmography is needed to prove the value of this method and of CRT optimization in general. The measurement of information content in any data suitable for CRT optimization, analysis of reproducibility and general usage of confidence intervals may show other methods appropriate for it, too. The cooperation with a statistician is oftentimes a necessity.