1. Comparative measurements of the female pelvis
- Author
-
Kenneth Dickinson and Ivan M. Procter
- Subjects
True conjugate ,business.industry ,Pelvic inlet ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Anatomy ,Diagonal conjugate ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Pelvimetry ,medicine ,business ,Birth canal ,Clinical evaluation ,Female pelvis ,Pelvis - Abstract
There are four methods by which the diameters of the pelvis may be measured: (1) The diagonal conjugate may be obtained and the true conjugate estimated from it by subtracting 1.5 to 2 cm., (2) X-rays may be directed into the pelvic inlet by the technique of Thoms, Torpin, and others, (3) X-rays may be directed lateral to the pelvic inlet by the technique of Thoms, Jacobs and others, and finally, (4) the patient may be operated upon and the true conjugate measured directly. Classification of the architecture of the pelvis is possible by the use of the x-ray. Several classifications are available. The more recent stem from the work of Turner and are based on morphology. Caldwell, Moloy, and Thoms have led in this work. They have borrowed extensively from the anthropologist, basing their classification on the contour of the pelvic inlet. This study is undertaken with the purpose of comparing the antero-posterior diameters of the pelvis obtained by the four methods outlined above. Such a comparison should assist us in evaluating the meaning of the diagonal conjugate; it should further assist us in formulating an opinion as to the accuracy of x-ray pelvimetry. Furthermore, if in addition to diameters, the structure and contours of the birth canal are studied both by x-ray and physical means, we are aided in the clinical evaluation of the female pelvis.
- Published
- 1942
- Full Text
- View/download PDF