Search

Despite lack of nationwide Medicare coverage by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the utilization of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has risen in popularity. The purpose was to compare primary and revision CDA from 2010 to 2020 with respect to: (1) utilization trends, (2) patient demographics, and (3) health care reimbursements.Using the PearlDiver database, we studied patients undergoing primary and revision CDA for degenerative cervical spine pathology from 2010 to 2020. Endpoints of the study were to compare patient demographics (including Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI]), annual utilization trends, length of stay (LOS), and reimbursements. Chi-square analyses compared patient demographics. t tests compared LOS and reimbursements. A linear regression was used to evaluate for trends in procedural volume over time. P values0.05 were considered statistically significant.In total, 15,306 patients underwent primary (n = 14,711) or revision CDA (n = 595). Patients undergoing revisions had a greater comorbidity burden (mean ECI 4.16 vs. 2.91; P0.0001). From 2010 to 2020, primary CDA utilization increased by 413% (447 vs. 2297 procedures; P0.001); comparatively, revision CDA utilization increased by 141% (32 vs. 77 procedures; P0.001). Mean LOS was greater for revision cases (1.37 vs. 3.30 days, P0.001). Reimbursements for revisions were higher on the day of surgery ($5585 vs. $13,692) and within 90 days of surgery ($7031 vs. $19,340), all P0.0001.There is a high rate of annual growth in CDA utilization and revision CDA in the United States. Reimbursements for revision CDA were more than double primary cases.

Background While studies have demonstrated favorable outcomes in utilization of primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), adverse events such as infections can still occur. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are associated with worse outcomes and patient morbidity. The purpose of this study was to: (1) compare patient demographics amongst TSA patients with and without PJIs following primary TSA; and (2) identify patient-related risk factors for PJIs following primary TSA. Methods Patients undergoing primary TSA for the treatment of glenohumeral OA were identified using the Mariner administrative claims database by CPT code 23,472. Laterality modifiers were utilized to ensure PJIs were developing in the correct laterality as those patients undergoing primary TSA. Inclusion for the study group consisted of patients who developed PJIs within 2-years after the index procedure, whereas patients who did not develop PJIs served as the comparison cohort. Primary outcomes analyzed included patient demographics and patient-related risk factors for PJIs following primary TSA. A stepwise backwards elimination multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses was performed to determine the odds (OR) of PJIs in patients undergoing primary TSA. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant. Results The query yielded 15,396 patients who underwent primary TSA for glenohumeral OA, of which 191 patients developed PJIs and 15,205 did not develop PJIs. The study found statistically significant differences amongst patients who did and did not develop PJIs following primary TSA with respect to age, sex, and presence of comorbid conditions. Risk factors associated with developing PJIs following primary TSA included: pathologic weight loss (OR: 2.06, P Conclusion As the number of primary TSAs for the treatment of glenohumeral OA increase worldwide, identifying modifiable risk-factors to reduce the incidence of infection is critical. The study found various modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with developing PJIs following primary TSA. This study is valuable to orthopedists in order to identify and risk-stratify patients with regard to PJI in the setting of primary TSA for OA. Level of Evidence Level III; Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION While studies have shown favorable outcomes in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with the utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA), adverse events, such as infections, can still occur. Therefore, the aims of this study were to 1) compare baseline demographics and 2) identify risk factors associated with developing either surgical site infections (SSIs) or peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures were queried from the Medicare database. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients developing SSIs within 90 days or PJIs within 3 years following the index procedure. The query yielded 2502 patients who developed infections in the form of either SSIs (n = 987) or PJIs (n = 1515) out of 57,191 patients treated for femoral neck fractures with primary THA. Primary endpoints were to compare baseline demographic profiles and determine risk factors associated with developing infections. Multivariate binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the odds (OR) of developing infections. A p value less than 0.001 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS Patients who developed either infections were found to be significantly different when compared to patients who did not develop infections. SSI (10 vs. 8, p

Cephalomedullary nail (CMN) cut-out is a severe complication of treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. This study aimed to identify modifiable risk factors predictive of implant cut-out including: CMN proximal fixation type (lag screw vs. helical blade), tip-apex distance (TAD), reduction quality, nail length, screw location, and surgeon fellowship training. A systematic review of the published literature was conducted on Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for English language papers (January 1st, 1985–May 10th, 2020), with 21 studies meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. Studies providing quantitative data comparing factors affecting CMN nail cut-out were included, including fixation type (lag screw vs. helical blade), tip-apex distance (TAD), reduction quality, nail length, and screw location. Twelve studies were included and graded by MINOR and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale to identify potential biases. Meta-analysis and pooled analysis were conducted when possible with forest plots to summarize odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). There was no difference in implant cut-out rate between lag screws (n = 745) versus helical blade (n = 371) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.25–4.23). Pooled data analysis revealed TAD > 25 mm (n = 310) was associated with higher odds of increased cut-out rate relative to TAD 25 mm is a reliable predictor of implant cut-out risk. Suboptimal screw location and poor reduction quality are associated with increased risk of screw cut-out. Level III.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objectives As of 2022, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services does not provide nationwide coverage for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The aim was to determine whether Medicare beneficiaries have differences in: (1) lengths of stay (LOS); (2) complications; (3) readmissions; and (4) costs of care. Methods Using the 2010 to 2020 PearlDiver database, we queried patients undergoing primary CDA for degenerative disc pathology. Study groups patients were those undergoing CDA with Medicare coverage (n = 1467); patients without Medicare coverage were the comparison cohort (n = 15,389). Endpoints were to compare demographics and comorbidities within the Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), LOS, 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day reimbursements. A multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate odds (OR) of medical complications and readmissions within 90-days. A P-value less than .003 was significant. Results Patients with Medicare coverage undergoing CDA had higher mean ECI compared to alternative payers (5.24 vs 3.26; P < .0001). Mean LOS was significantly higher for Medicare beneficiaries (2.20 vs 1.76 days; P < .010). There was no significant differences in odds of all medical complications (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: .98-1.44; P = .069) or readmission rates (1.77% vs 1.33%, OR:0.82, 95% CI: .50-1.29; P = .417) within 90-days following the index procedure among Medicare beneficiaries vs alternative payers. Non-Medicare beneficiaries had higher 90-day reimbursements compared to Medicare beneficiaries ($6,700 vs $7,086, P < .001). Conclusions Medicare beneficiaries despite having slightly longer lengths of stay did not have higher rates of medical complications or readmissions. Surgeons and policy makers may use this data to consider alternative treatments in Medicare patients.

The World Health Organization (WHO) postulates that depressive disorders (DD) will be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality by 2030. Studies evaluating the association of DD following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of acetabular fractures are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this matched-control study was to determine whether DD patients undergoing ORIF for acetabular fractures have higher rates of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) medical complications; and (4) costs of care. A retrospective query from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF) was performed to identify patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures. The study group consisted of those patients with DD, whereas patients without the condition served as controls. Primary endpoints of the study were to compare in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, ninety-day medical complications, and costs of care. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The query yielded 7084 patients within the study (ORIF = 1187, control = 5897). DD patients were found to have significantly longer in-hospital LOS (11 days vs. 10 days, p

Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of sleep apnea (SA) to be increasing within the United States. While studies have shown the association of SA and its association on complications following elective orthopedic procedures, well-powered studies investigating its impact in a traumatic setting are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether SA patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures have higher rates of: (1) hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) complications; and (4) healthcare expenditures. The 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files was queried from 2005 to 2014 for patients who sustained femoral neck fractures and were treated with primary THA. The study group consisted of patients with concomitant diagnoses of SA, whereas patients without SA served as controls. Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and various comorbid conditions. Demographics of the cohorts were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the odds (OR) of the effects of SA on postoperative outcomes. A p value less than 0.006 was considered to be statistically significant. The final query yielded 24,936 patients within the study (n = 4166) and control (n = 20,770) cohorts. SA patients had significantly longer in-hospital LOS (6 vs. 5 days, p

Introduction Sleep Apnea (SA) is a common sleep disorder that increases postoperative morbidity. There is limited research on how SA influences outcomes following operative fixation of ankle fractures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine whether patients who undergo surgical fixation for bimalleolar ankle fractures have higher rates of medical complications and health care expenditures. Methods A retrospective review from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2014 was conducted using the parts A and B Medicare Data from PearlDiver database. Patients with and without SA on the day of the primary open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of their bimalleolar ankle fractures were queried using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Welch’s t-tests were used to compare costs of care. A multivariate binomial logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of adverse events. A P-value Results There were 20 560 patients (SA = 3150; comparison cohort = 17 410) who underwent ORIF for bimalleolar ankle fractures during the study period. Sleep apnea patients were found to have significantly higher rates and odds of 90-day medical complications (21.42% vs 7.47%, OR: 3.11, P < .0001) and 90-day costs of care ($7213.12 vs $5415.79, P < .0001). Conclusion This research demonstrates an increased risk of postoperative medical complications and health care costs among patients with SA undergoing ORIF for bimalleolar ankle fractures. Level of Evidence Therapeutic, Level IV: Retrospective

Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases 2022;80(2):228-33228 Mahmood B, Golub IJ, Ashraf AM, Ng MK, Vakharia RM, Choueka J. Risk factors for infections following open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius fractures: an analysis of the medicare claims database. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2022;80(2):228-33. Abstract Background: Infections following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures (DRFs) are associated with worse outcomes and increasing health care costs. The purpose of this study was to utilize a nationwide administrative claims database to compare patient demo- graphics of patients who did and did not develop infections and identify patient-related risk factors for postoperative infections.Using the PearlDiver database, the 100% Medicare Files from 2005 to 2014 were queried. Patients undergoing ORIF for DRF were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Inclusion for the study group consisted of patients who developed infection within 90 days after the procedure and were identified us- ing CPT and International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Multivariable binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the odds (OR) of certain patient comorbidities and their association with infection following ORIF of DRFs. A p-value less than 0.002 was considered statistically significant after Bonfer- roni correction.The query yielded 132,650 patients within the study, 456 who developed surgical site infections (SSI) and 132,194 who did not. Surgical site infections were more commonly found in certain demographics, such as patients under the age of 65 (26.75 vs. 14.73%) and in males (20.83 vs. 14.15%). Multivariate regression analysis further highlighted that certain comorbidities increased odds for infections within 90-days following ORIF for distal radius fractures and those included: morbid obesity (OR: 2.06, p0.0001), depression (OR: 1.92, p = 0.0002), and pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.49, p = 0.001).The study found statistically significant dif- ferences between patients who developed and did not develop infection. These findings may help orthopedic surgeons to educate certain high-risk patients of the potential complica- tions that may occur following surgery.

Studies evaluating the association of dementia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures are limited. The aim was to investigate whether patients who have dementia undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures have higher rates of (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); 2) complications (medical and prostheses-related); and 3) healthcare expenditures.A retrospective query using the PearlDiver database from January 1st, 2005 to March 31st, 2014 to identify patients with dementia undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures was performed. Dementia patients were 1:5 ratio matched to controls which yielded 22,758 patients in the study with (n = 3,798) and without (n = 18,960) dementia. Primary outcomes included comparing LOS, complications, and costs. A logistic regression was constructed to calculate the odds-ratios (OR) of dementia on complications. A p-value less than 0.004 was significant.Dementia patients had longer LOS (7-days vs. 6-days, p 0.0001) and higher incidence and odds of medical complications (41.52 vs. 17.77%; OR 3.76, p 0.0001), including cerebrovascular events (5.66 vs. 1.64%; OR 2.35, p 0.0001), pneumoniae (9.98 vs. 3.82%; OR 1.82, p 0.0001), and acute kidney injury (8.37 vs. 3.27%; OR 1.62, p 0.0001). Study group patients had higher frequency of prostheses-related complications (9.53 vs. 8.31%; OR: 1.16, p = 0.012). The study group had greater total healthcare expenditures ($28,879.57 vs. $26,234.10, p 0.0001) when analyzing ninety-day episode of care charges.Patients with dementia undergoing THA due to femoral neck fracture have increased LOS, medical and prostheses-related complications, and cost of care compared to their counterparts.

The literature has shown an increase in prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD) within the United States alongside a concomitant rise in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. As such, with these parallel increases, orthopaedic surgeons will invariably encounter CD patients requiring TKA. Limited studies exist evaluating the impact of this disease on patients undergoing the procedure; therefore, this study endeavors to determine whether CD patients undergoing primary TKA have higher rates of (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS), (2) medical complications, and (3) episode of care (EOC) costs. To accomplish this, a nationwide database was queried from January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2014 to identify patients undergoing TKA. The study group, patients with CD, was randomly matched to the controls, patients without CD, in a 1:5 ratio after accounting for age, sex, and medical comorbidities associated with CD. Patients consuming corticosteroids were excluded, as they are at risk of higher rates of adverse events following TKA. This query ultimately yielded a total of 96,213 patients, with 16,037 in the study cohort and 80,176 in the control one. The study compared in-hospital (LOS), 90-day medical complications, and day of surgery and total global 90-day EOC costs between CD and non-CD patients undergoing primary TKA. The results found CD patients undergoing primary TKA had significantly longer in-hospital LOS (4- vs. 3 days, p

Outpatient primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) accounts for approximately 8% of all total hip arthroplasties (THA) performed annually in the United States. As of 2020, Medicare removed THA from its inpatient-only list, allowing reimbursement as an outpatient procedure. This study aimed to determine whether outpatient primary THA is a potential alternative to inpatient procedures by assessing: 1) 90-day postoperative complications; 2) readmission rates; and 3) total costs of care.Using a national database, a matched case-control study was conducted of primary THAs performed between January 1, 2008 and March 31, 2018. Outpatient primary THAs were identified (n=10,463) and matched in a 1:5 ratio to inpatient primary THAs (n=52,306) for age, sex, and comorbidities. Outcomes assessed were 90-day medical complications, readmissions, and associated total costs of care. Baseline demographics were compared using Pearson's chi-squared analyses, with multivariate logistic regressions to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Patients undergoing outpatient THA had fewer 90-day complications (9.3 vs. 11.9%; OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.87, p0.0001) relative to the inpatient cohort. Ninety-day readmission rates between outpatient and inpatient THAs were similar (4.1 vs. 4.8%; OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.03, p=0.166). Ninety-day costs were significantly lower for the outpatient cohort ($2,650.00 vs. $19,299.00, p0.0001).Our study includes a large sample size of outpatient primary THAs and is the first to provide data quantifying cost differences relative to inpatient THAs. Our results suggest, in certain populations, that outpatient primary THAs are a safe alternative to inpatient procedures with the potential to decrease healthcare costs.

The World Health Organization (WHO) postulates that depressive disorders (DD) will be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality by 2030. Studies evaluating the association of DD following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of acetabular fractures are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this matched-control study was to determine whether DD patients undergoing ORIF for acetabular fractures have higher rates of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) medical complications; and (4) costs of care.A retrospective query from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF) was performed to identify patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures. The study group consisted of those patients with DD, whereas patients without the condition served as controls. Primary endpoints of the study were to compare in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, ninety-day medical complications, and costs of care. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant.The query yielded 7084 patients within the study (ORIF = 1187, control = 5897). DD patients were found to have significantly longer in-hospital LOS (11 days vs. 10 days, p 0.0001); however, odds (OR) of readmission rates were similar (23.16 vs. 18.68%; OR: 0.91, p = 0.26). Multivariate regression demonstrated DD to be associated with significantly higher (67.69 vs. 25.54%; OR: 2.64, p 0.0001) 90-day medical complications. DD patients had significantly higher day of surgery ($30,505.93 vs. $28,424.85, p 0.0001) and total global 90-day costs ($41,721.98 vs. $37,330.16, p 0.0001) of care.After adjusting for covariates, DD is associated with longer in-hospital, complications, and costs of care in patients undergoing ORIF for the treatment of acetabular fractures, whereas readmission rates are similar. The study is vital as it can be used by orthopaedists and healthcare professionals to adequately educate these patients of the potential outcomes following their surgical procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors associated with primary THA readmissions have not yet been thoroughly analyzed when stratified by underlying indication. Given that a majority of THAs are done electively in the context of osteoarthritis (OA), it remains to be explored whether or not THAs performed non-electively in the trauma setting have different readmission patterns. Therefore, the aims of this study were to identify: 1) causes of readmissions; 2) patient-related risk-factors for readmissions; and 3) costs associated with the reasons for readmissions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who sustained a femoral neck fracture and underwent primary THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified. Those subsequently readmitted within 90-days following the procedure comprised the study cohort whereas those not readmitted served as the comparison cohort. Primary outcomes included identifying causes of readmissions, identifying patient-related risk-factors associated with readmissions and determining healthcare expenditures associated with the different readmission etiologies. A regression analysis was used to calculate the odds (OR) for readmissions. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The regression model demonstrated the greatest patient-related risk factors included: electrolyte and fluid disorders (OR: 1.80, p < 0.0001), morbid obesity (OR: 1.60, p < 0.0001), pathologic weight loss (OR: 1.58, p < 0.0001), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.41, p < 0.0001), were the leading risk factors for readmissions. Pulmonary-related causes ($42,357.71) of readmission were the leading driver of costs of care. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons should identify and optimize pre-operative management of patient-related risk factors that increase readmissions following primary THA for femoral neck fractures. Additionally, pulmonary-related causes of readmission lead to the highest costs of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: To determine whether opioid use disorder (OUD) patients undergoing 1- to 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (1-2ACDF) have higher rates of: 1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); 2) readmissions; 3) complications; and 4) costs. Methods: OUD patients undergoing primary 1-2ACDF were identified within the Medicare database and matched to a control cohort in a 1:5 ratio by age, sex, and medical comorbidities. The query yielded 80,683 patients who underwent 1-2 ACDF with (n = 13,448) and without (n = 67,235) OUD. Outcomes analyzed included in-hospital LOS, 90-day readmission rates, 90-day medical complications, and costs. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds-ratios (OR) for medical complications and readmissions. Welch’s t-test was used to test for significance for LOS and cost between the cohorts. An alpha value less than 0.002 was considered statistically significant. Results: OUD patients were found to have significantly longer in-hospital LOS compared to their counterparts (3.41 vs. 2.23-days, P < .0001), in addition to higher frequency and odds of requiring readmissions (21.62 vs. 11.57%; OR: 1.38, P < .0001). Study group patients were found to have higher frequency and odds of developing medical complications (0.88 vs. 0.19%, OR: 2.80, P < .0001) and incurred higher episode of care costs ($20,399.62 vs. $16,812.14, P < .0001). Conclusion: The study can help to push orthopaedic surgeons in better managing OUD patients pre-operatively in terms of safe discontinuation and education of opioid drugs and their effects on complications, leading to more satisfactory outcomes.