Search

The safety and efficacy of elective drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for unrestrictive de novo coronary stenosis in daily practice is not fully understood, especially in comparison to those of drug-eluting stents (DESs).A total of 588 consecutive de novo coronary stenotic lesions electively and successfully treated with either DCB (n=275) or DESs (n=313) between January 2016 and December 2019 at our medical center were included. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary angiographic efficacy endpoint was angiographic restenosis frequency, defined as a follow-up percent diameter stenosis of50. The endpoints were compared after baseline adjustment using propensity score matching. In addition, the frequency and predictors of late lumen enlargement (LLE), defined as minus late luminal loss, were examined in 201 crude angiographic follow-up lesions after DCB angioplasty.A total of 31 baseline parameters were adjusted to analyze 177 lesions in each group. The TLF frequencies (DCB group: 9.6% during a mean observational interval of 789±488 days vs. DES group: 10.2%, 846±484 days, p=0.202) and cumulative TLF-free ratios of both groups were not significantly different (p=0.892, log-rank test). The angiographic restenosis frequency in the DCB group (6.3%, n=128) was not significantly different from that of the DES group (10.1%, n=100, p=0.593). LLE was observed in 45.3% of entire lesions, and a type-A dissection was a significant predictor of LLE among 23 variables (odds ratio: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.31-6.95, p=0.010).The present single-center retrospective study revealed statistically equivalent midterm clinical safety and angiographic efficacy among both elective DCB angioplasty and DESs placements in the treatment of unrestrictive de novo coronary lesions. In our daily practice environment, LLE was achieved in approximately half after DCB angioplasty.

Aims To examine the effects of a 24-month treatment with ipragliflozin on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods and results In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, and blinded-endpoint investigator-initiated clinical trial, adults with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) of 6.0–10.0% (42–86 mmol/mol) were randomized equally to ipragliflozin (50 mg daily) and non-sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor use of standard-care (control group) for type 2 diabetes and were followed-up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was the change in mean common carotid artery IMT (CCA-IMT) from baseline to 24 months. A total of 482 patients were equally allocated to the ipragliflozin (N = 241) and control (N = 241) groups, and 464 patients (median age 68 years, female 31.7%, median type 2 diabetes duration 8 years, median HbA1c 7.3%) were included in the analyses. For the primary endpoint, the changes in the mean CCA-IMT from baseline to 24 months were 0.0013 [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.0155–0.0182] mm and 0.0015 (95% CI, −0.0155–0.0184) mm in the ipragliflozin and control groups, respectively, with an estimated group difference (ipragliflozin-control) of −0.0001 mm (95% CI, −0.0191–0.0189; P = 0.989). A group difference in HbA1c change at 24 months was also non-significant between the treatment groups [−0.1% (95% CI, −0.2–0.1); P = 0.359]. Conclusion Twenty-four months of ipragliflozin treatment did not affect carotid IMT status in patients with type 2 diabetes recruited in the PROTECT study, relative to the non-SGLT2 inhibitor-use standard care for type 2 diabetes.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce the risk of heart failure progression and mortality rates. Moreover, osmotic diuresis induced by SGLT2 inhibition may result in an improved heart failure prognosis. Independent of conventional diuretics in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic heart failure, especially in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it is unclear whether SGLT2i chronically reduces estimated plasma volume (ePV). As a subanalysis of the CANDLE trial, which assessed the effect of canagliflozin on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), we examined the change (%) in ePV over 24 weeks of treatment based on the baseline level associated with diuretic usage. In the CANDLE trial, nearly all patients were clinically stable (NYHA class I-II), with approximately 70% of participants presenting a baseline phenotype of HFpEF. A total of 99 (42.5%) patients were taking diuretics (mostly furosemide) at baseline, while 134 (57.5%) were not. Relative to glimepiride, canagliflozin significantly reduced ePV without worsening renal function in patients in both groups: -4.00% vs. 1.46% (p = 0.020) for the diuretic group and -6.14% vs. 1.28% (p 0.001) for the nondiuretic group. Furthermore, canagliflozin significantly reduced serum uric acid without causing major electrolyte abnormalities in patients in both subgroups. The long-term beneficial effect of SGLT2i on intravascular congestion could be independent of conventional diuretic therapy without worsening renal function in patients with T2D and HF (HFpEF predominantly). In addition, the beneficial effects of canagliflozin are accompanied by improved hyperuricemia without causing major electrolyte abnormalities.

Aims/Introduction Recent clinical trials on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors showed improved outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at a high risk of cardiovascular events. However, the underlying effects on endothelial function remain unclear. Materials and Methods The effect of empagliflozin on endothelial function in cardiovascular high risk diabetes mellitus: Multi‐center placebo‐controlled double‐blind randomized (EMBLEM) trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease showed empagliflozin treatment for 24 weeks had no effect on peripheral endothelial function measured by reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry. This post‐hoc analysis of the EMBLEM trial included a detailed evaluation of the effects of empagliflozin on peripheral endothelial function in order to elucidate the clinical characteristics of responders or non‐responders to treatment. Results Of the 47 patients randomized into the empagliflozin group, 21 (44.7%) showed an increase in the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) after 24 weeks of intervention, with no apparent difference in the clinical characteristics between patients whose RHI either increased (at least >0) or did not increase. There was also no obvious difference between the treatment groups in the proportion of patients who had a clinically meaningful change (≥15%) in log‐transformed RHI. No correlation was found between changes in RHI and clinical variables, such as vital signs and laboratory parameters. Conclusions Treatment with empagliflozin for 24 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease did not affect peripheral endothelial function, and was not related to changes in clinical variables, including glycemic parameters. These findings suggest that the actions of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors other than direct improvement in peripheral endothelial function were responsible, at least in the early phase, for the clinical benefits found in recent cardiovascular outcome trials., This secondary analysis of the effect of empagliflozin on endothelial function in cardiovascular high risk diabetes mellitus: Multi‐center placebo‐controlled double‐blind randomized trial included a detailed evaluation of the effect of empagliflozin treatment on endothelial function, its association with clinical variables and the clinical characteristics of responders or non‐responders to treatment. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the proportion of patients who had a clinically meaningful change (≥15%) in log‐transformed reactive hyperemia index. No correlation was also observed between changes in reactive hyperemia index and clinical variables, such as vital signs and laboratory parameters.

Background Little is known about the impacts of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on cardiac functional parameters, such as natriuretic peptides, in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with concomitant chronic heart failure (CHF). Purpose To compare the effect of canagliflozin with glimepiride, based on changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), in that patient population. Methods This trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial at 34 centers in Japan. Patients with T2D and clinically stable CHF excluding NYHA class IV, randomized to receive canagliflozin 100 mg or glimepiride (starting dose: 0.5 mg), were examined using the primary endpoint of non-inferiority of canagliflozin versus glimepiride, defined as a margin of 1.1 in the upper-limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the group ratio of percentage change in NT-proBNP at 24 weeks. Results Data analysis of 233 patients (mean age 68.6±10.1 yrs; 75% male) showed mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at randomization was 57.6±14.6%, with 71% of patients having a preserved LVEF (≥50%). The ratio of NT-proBNP percentage change was 0.48 (95% CI, −0.13 to 1.59, P=0.226), and therefore did not meet the prespecified non-inferiority margin. However, data stratified according to baseline NT-proBNP levels showed a trend that canagliflozin treatment reduced NT-proBNP levels to a greater extent than in subgroups with elevated levels of NT-proBNP (Figure A). Furthermore, NT-proBNP levels in the canagliflozin group did show a nonsignificant trend lower in the subgroup with preserved LVEF (Figure B), but not in the subgroup with reduced LVEF (Figure C). Additionally, the changes in the NYHA class were comparable between groups (P=0.061) in the overall cohort, whereas in the subgroup with a preserved LVEF canagliflozin caused a significant improvement in NYHA classes compared to that found for glimepiride treatment (P=0.027). Conclusions This trial did not meet the predefined primary endpoint of changes in NT-proBNP levels, with 24 weeks of treatment with canagliflozin relative to glimepiride which together with other recent studies would question the value of continuing to monitor NT-proBNP levels after the initial diagnosis of heart failure. Nevertheless, in a subgroup with preserved LVEF, there was a non-significant trend for canagliflozin treatment to reduce NT-proBNP levels and improve symptoms even in stable HF patients. Further research is therefore warranted to determine whether patients with preserved LVEF, regardless of diabetes status, could potentially benefit from treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors. Changes in NT-proBNP Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation

Aim: We examined the impact of baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) on major cardiac adverse events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a long-term secondary prevention. Method: CEC was measured using a cell-based efflux system in (3)[H]-cholesterol-labeled J774 macrophages in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma between January 2011 and January 2013. Patients with CAD were divided into 2 groups as a boundary CEC value of 1: 0.19 ≤ CEC ＜1 (impaired CEC group, mean CEC of 0.76±0.16, n =136), and 1 ≤ CEC ≤ 2.08 (enhanced CEC group, 1.20±0.19, n =44). MACE, comprised the incidence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularizations (RV) without restenosis approximately 1 year after vascularization, was retrospectively investigated at September 2019. Impact of enhanced CEC on MACE among 22 variables was examined by applying a Cox proportional hazard model. Result: The frequency of MACE in impaired CEC group (16.9%, mean observational interval of 2111±888 days) was significantly higher than that in enhanced CEC group (2.3%, 2,252±685, p =0.013), largely driven by the significantly higher RV incidence (14.0 % versus 2.3 %, p =0.032). Enhancement of CEC was the significant predictor of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.013-0.879; p =0.038). Conclusion: A baseline CEC level of more than 1 in patients with CAD brought favorable long-term clinical outcomes, suggesting that CEC is a useful prognostic and therapeutic surrogate for secondary prevention of CAD.

Here, we report on a healthy 30-year-old man with no significant medical history, who tested negative for human immunodeficiency virus antigenemia but developed Aspergillus pancarditis. A case of this kind is extremely rare, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with Aspergillus pancarditis, which generally leads to a very poor outcome, who had a long-term favorable clinical course. A biopsy from the right atrium of hypertrophied atrial septum was essential for obtaining the definitive diagnosis. Long-term administration of an effective antifungal oral agent might account for the patient's favorable outcome.

Recent large trials on sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors showed that these agents improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with a high risk of cardiovascular events (1). However, the underlying mechanisms of these clinical benefits and vascular effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in that patient group remain uncertain. Endothelial dysfunction is exacerbated by metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, and involved in the pathophysiology of diabetes-related cardiovascular complications (2,3). We therefore investigated whether empagliflozin added to standard therapy, compared with placebo, affected endothelial function in patients with T2D and established cardiovascular disease (CVD). This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial undertaken in 16 centers in Japan (clinical trial reg. no. UMIN000024502, www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) (4). A total of 117 adults with T2D and established CVD were randomized (1:1) to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for 24 weeks. Randomization was performed by using the web-based minimization dynamic allocation method stratified according to HbA1c, age, systolic blood pressure (BP), and smoking status. The placebo was indistinguishable from empagliflozin, and both study drugs were sequentially numbered and concealed. The participants and investigators remained masked to group assignments until the database lock (an action taken to prevent further changes to a clinical trial database). The effects of treatment on endothelial function were assessed by the reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry index (RHI) (5), with the primary efficacy end point being the change in RHI from baseline to 24 weeks. Ethics approval and informed patient consent were obtained. Of the 117 patients, 105 were included in the full analysis set. Ten patients dropped out prior to initiation of the study drug, and two patients in the placebo group were excluded due to a serious protocol deviation (lack of data …

Background: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce heart failure (HF)-related outcome risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, little is known about the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2D and concomitant HF. Methods: CANDLE was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre trial at 34 centers in Japan. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients with T2D and New York Heart Association class I-III stable HF to canagliflozin 100 mg once daily or glimepiride (initiation: 0*5 or 1*0 mg daily) by using a computer-generated, dynamic balancing method, stratified by age, HbA1c, and left ventricular ejection fraction, and treated for 24 weeks. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to group assignment, but assessors for the primary endpoint were blinded. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of canagliflozin versus glimepiride, with a non-inferiority margin 1*1 in the group ratio of the percentage change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 24 weeks. Findings: Between August 10, 2015 and June 30, 2017, 122 patients were assigned to canagliflozin and 123 to glimepiride: 113 in the canagliflozin group and 120 in the glimepiride group were included in the primary endpoint analysis. The group ratio of NT-proBNP percentage changes was 0*48 (95% CI, -0*13 to 1*59, p=0*226). Meanwhile, a group difference in the NT-proBNP absolute change from baseline to 24 weeks was significant (canagliflozin: -107*0 ± 597*8 pg/mL; glimepiride 21*7 ± 252*8, p=0*047). Canagliflozin was well tolerated with adverse events comparable to those of glimepiride. Interpretation: Although the trial did not meet the primary endpoint, canagliflozin significantly reduced NT-proBNP, compared to glimepiride, in patients with T2D and HF. Our data suggest clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in that population. Trial Registry Number: This study is registered with the University Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, 000017669. Funding Statement: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. Declaration of Interests: AT has received modest honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novo Nordisk, Taisho Toyama, and Takeda. IT has received grants and personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Otsuka, MSD, Shionogi, Kowa, Sumitomo Dainippon, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Mochida. MS has received grants and personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, MSD, Kowa, and AstraZeneca. SU has received grants from Kowa, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, honoraria from MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Chugai. JO belongs to the endowed department of Fukuda Denshi. MK has received grants from Japanese government, Japan Heart Foundation, Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Novartis, Nihon Kohden, and Kureha, grants and personal fees from Astellas, Pfizer, Ono, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and AstraZeneca, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo. TM has received grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Ono, and Kowa. KN has received grants from Mitsubishi Tanabe, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from MSD, Astellas, Amgen Astellas, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Otsuka, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, Ono, and Mitsubishi Tanabe, grants from Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Teijin, Terumo, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer, scholarship from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Teijin, Astellas, Takeda, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The trial was approved by individual sites’ institutional review boards or independent ethics committees, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the current legal regulations in Japan.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for patients with ischemic heart disease. In particular, restenosis is suppressed after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. However, several problems remain. Previously, we reported neointimal proliferation after DES implantation, which was associated with insulin resistance (IR). The aim of the present study was to clarify whether IR is associated with mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after 1st-generation DES implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS We researched the clinical records of 109 patients who had undergone elective PCI and DES implantation between May 2007 and December 2010. We segregated these patients according to the value of the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) into Group P (n=63; HOMA-IR ≥2.5, positive) and Group N (n=46; HOMA-IR

Hyperuricemia is a known cardiovascular risk factor. The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) losartan is known to decrease serum uric acid (UA) level. A recent in vitro study demonstrated a strong interaction between irbesartan and UA transporters that exceeded that of losartan. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the hypouricemic effect of irbesartan in a clinical setting. A total of 40 high-risk hypertensive outpatients with coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and/or diabetes complications who were taking ARBs other than irbesartan and losartan were enrolled in this study. After a 4-week control period, the patients' prescribed ARBs were exchanged for an equivalent dose of irbesartan. We assessed blood pressure, heart rate, serum UA level, parameters of lipid and glucose metabolism, cardiac and renal function and inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in blood samples taken immediately before the initiation of irbesartan treatment and again after 12 weeks of treatment. All 40 recruited patients were followed (31 men and 9 women, mean age: 68 years) without any dropouts. During the 12 weeks of irbesartan treatment, no significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, parameters of lipid or glucose metabolism or other biomarkers of cardiac function, renal function, or inflammation were observed. However, UA level (5.9±1.6 to 5.5±1.6 mg ml(-1), P=0.028) and the oxidative stress marker derivative reactive oxygen metabolites (dROMs) (354±83 to 310±65 U.CARR, P0.001) were significantly lower at 12 weeks of treatment compared with before treatment. These results suggest that irbesartan has beneficial effects on hyperuricemia and oxidative stress.

Here, we report on a healthy 30-year-old man with no significant medical history, who tested negative for human immunodeficiency virus antigenemia but developed Aspergillus pancarditis. A case of this kind is extremely rare, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with Aspergillus pancarditis, which generally leads to a very poor outcome, who had a long-term favorable clinical course. A biopsy from the right atrium of hypertrophied atrial septum was essential for obtaining the definitive diagnosis. Long-term administration of an effective antifungal oral agent might account for the patient's favorable outcome.

We report on four elderly women in whom carbamazepine was suspected of inducing sinus node dysfunction (3 patients) and atrioventricular block (1 patient). Patients were treated with carbamazepine, 200 to 600 mg a day, for trigeminal neuralgia (n = 3) or epilepsy (n = 1). After 1 to 16 months of carbamazepine therapy, these patients were admitted to our emergency room because of bradyarrhythmia. Their conduction disturbances on electrocardiographic monitoring disappeared immediately after the cessation of carbamazepine intake. Provocation tests were performed on three patients. Because of renal insufficiency, one patient could not undergo the provocation test. Her carbamazepine clearance was markedly decreased. Carbamazepine induced sinus arrest in two patients within 48 hours after intake, but did not induce atrioventricular block in the remaining patient. In two patients, computer simulation of carbamazepine pharmacokinetics was performed and disclosed a clear-cut relationship between the plasma concentration of carbamazepine and the frequency of sinus arrest. During the test, the maximum plasma carbamazepine concentration in these two patients did not exceed the therapeutic range. However, it did exceed the range in the one with a negative test. Our results suggest that careful monitoring of ECG and plasma drug concentration is required with carbamazepine therapy, especially in elderly women.