Search

Background: Advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid disease-consisting of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the myeloid blast phase and in the accelerated phase, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia-is associated with poor outcomes. Although previous studies have suggested the benefit of chemotherapy and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, the optimal regimen is uncertain and prospective studies for this rare group of diseases are scant. Preclinical and retrospective clinical data suggest possible synergy between the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aimed to design a study to evaluate the safety and activity of a novel combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and the third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib in advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid diseases., Methods: For this phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated or relapsed or refractory myeloid chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, or advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3 were eligible. Patients were eligible regardless of the number of previous lines of therapy received or previous receipt of ponatinib. Cycle 1 (induction) consisted of a 7-day lead-in of ponatinib 45 mg orally daily (days 1-7), followed by combination therapy with decitabine 20 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 8-12, venetoclax orally daily with ramp-up to a maximum dose of 400 mg on days 8-28, and ponatinib 45 mg orally daily on days 8-28. Cycles 2-24 consisted of decitabine 20 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1-5, venetoclax orally 400 mg on days 1-21, and ponatinib orally daily on days 1-28. Response-based dosing of ponatinib was implemented in consolidation cycles, with reduction to 30 mg daily in patients who reached complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery and a reduction to 15 mg daily in patients with undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188405) and is still ongoing., Results: Between July 12, 2020, and July 8, 2023, 20 patients were treated (14 with chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, four with chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, and two with advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia). The median age was 43 years (IQR 32-58); 13 (65%) patients were male and seven (35%) were female; and 12 (60%) were White, three (15%) were Hispanic, four (20%) were Black, and one (5%) was Asian. 12 (60%) patients had received 2 or more previous BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 14 (70%) patients had at least one high-risk additional chromosomal abnormality or complex karyotype. The median duration of follow-up was 21·2 months (IQR 14·1-24·2). The complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery rate was 50% (10 of 20 patients); complete remission in one [5%] patient and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in nine [45%]). An additional six (30%) patients had a morphologic leukaemia-free state. The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were febrile neutropenia in eight (40%) patients, infection in six (30%), and alanine or aspartate transaminase elevation in five (25%). Eight (40%) patients had at least one cardiovascular event of any grade. There were three on-study deaths, none of which was considered related to the study treatment and all from infections in the setting of refractory leukaemia., Interpretation: The combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib is safe and shows promising activity in patients with advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, including those with multiple previous therapies or high-risk disease features. Further studies evaluating chemotherapy and venetoclax-based combination strategies using newer-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted., Funding: Takeda Oncology, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NJS has received consulting fees from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, NKARTA, Autolus, and Sanofi; research funding from Takeda Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Xencor, Stemline Therapeutics, and NextCure; and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda Oncology, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, and BeiGene. EJ has received consulting fees and research funding from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Ascentage, ASTX Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Autolus, BMS, Genenenctech, Hikma, Kite, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda Oncology, and Jazz. HA has received consulting fees from Molecular Partners; research funding from Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, and EBD-300; and honoraria from Illumina. MK has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Auxenion, Bakx, Boehringer, Dark Blue Therapeutics, F Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Legend, MEI Pharma, Redona, Sanofi, Sellas, Stemline, and Vincerx; research funding from AbbVie, Allogene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, ImmunoGen, MEI Pharma, Precision, Rafael, Sanofi, and Stemline; honoraria from AbbVie, Baxk Therapeutics, Genentech, and Stemline Therapeutics; stock options in Reata Pharamceuticals; and holds patents with Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Reata Pharmaceutical. HK has received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Immunogen, and Novartis and honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Novartis, Pfizer, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline, and Takeda Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience dismal outcomes. We performed a comprehensive analysis of patients with relapsed AML to determine the genetic dynamics and factors predicting survival. We analyzed 875 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive treatment or low-intensity treatment. Of these patients, 197 subsequently relapsed. Data were available for 164 of these patients, with a median time from complete remission/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery to relapse of 6.5 months. Thirty-five of the 164 patients (21%) experienced relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. At relapse, mutations in genes involved in pathway signaling tended to disappear, whereas clonal hematopoiesis-related mutations or TP53 tended to persist. Patients with normal karyotypes tended to acquire cytogenetic abnormalities at relapse. Patients treated intensively had a higher rate of emergence of TP53 mutations (16%), compared to patients given low-intensity treatment (1%, P=0.009). The overall response rates were 38% and 35% for patients treated with salvage intensive treatment or low-intensity treatment, respectively. Seventeen patients (10%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation after salvage therapy. The median overall survival duration after relapse was 5.3 months, with a 1-year overall survival rate of 17.6%. Complex karyotype (hazard ratio [HR]=2.14, P<0.001), a KMT2A rearrangement (HR=3.52, P=0.011), time in remission <12 months (HR=1.71, P=0.011), and an elevated white blood cell count at relapse (HR=2.38, P=0.005) were independent risk factors for overall survival duration. More effective frontline and maintenance therapies are warranted to prevent relapsed AML.

Twenty adults with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (RR) Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast phase (CML-LBP), were treated with mini-hyperCVD, ponatinib, and blinatumomab. Complete molecular response was achieved in 78% of ND patients, while CR/CRi was achieved in 100% of RR and CML-LBP. The 3-year overall survival rate was 76% (95% CI, 47%-90%)., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: NPM1-mutated (NPM1 mut ) myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with <20% bone marrow (BM) blasts (NPM1 mut MNs<20) are uncommon, and their classification remains inconsistent., Methods: The clinicopathologic features of 54 patients with NPM1 mut MNs <20 were evaluated and compared with wild-type NPM1 MNs <20 and NPM1 mut MNs≥20, respectively., Results: NPM1 mut MNs had similar features regardless of blast percentage, except for higher IDH2 (29% vs 7%, p = .023) and FLT3 (70% vs 11%, p < .001) frequency in patients with ≥20% BM blasts. Thirty-three (61%) patients with NPM1 mut MNs <20 received low-intensity chemotherapy (LIC) and 12 (22%) received intensive chemotherapy (IC). Higher complete remission rates (75% vs 27%, p = .006) and median overall survival (mOS) (not reached vs 30.4 months, p = .06) were observed with IC compared to LIC. Young patients (age <60 years) did not reach mOS either when treated with LIC or IC. Stem cell transplant was associated with increased survival only in patients treated with LIC (HR, 0.24; p = .025). No differences in mOS were observed by BM blast strata (32.2 months, not reached and 46.9 months for <10%, 10%-19%, and ≥20% blasts, p = .700) regardless of treatment modality (LIC: p = .900; IC: p = .360). Twenty-three patients (43%) with NPM1 mut MNs <20 had marrow blast progression to ≥20%., Conclusions: Overall, NPM1 mut MNs define a unique entity independent of BM blast percentage., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Ziftomenib (KO-539) is an oral selective menin inhibitor with known preclinical activity in menin-dependent acute myeloid leukaemia models. The primary objective of this study was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia based on safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity., Methods: KOMET-001 is a multicentre, open-label, multi-cohort, phase 1/2 clinical trial of ziftomenib in adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Results of the phase 1 study, conducted at 22 hospitals in France, Italy, Spain, and the USA, are presented here and comprise the dose-escalation (phase 1a) and dose-validation and expansion (phase 1b) phases. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less. For phase 1a, patients (all molecular subtypes) received ziftomenib (50-1000 mg) orally once daily in 28-day cycles. For phase 1b, patients with NPM1 mutations or with KMT2A rearrangements were randomly assigned (1:1) using third-party interactive response technology to two parallel dose cohorts (200 mg and 600 mg ziftomenib). Primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1a, and safety, remission rates, and pharmacokinetics supporting recommended phase 2 dose determination in phase 1b. Analyses were performed in all patients who received at least one dose of ziftomenib (modified intention-to-treat population). Phase 1a/1b is complete. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04067336, and the EU Clinical Trials register, EudraCT 2019-001545-41., Findings: From Sept 12, 2019, to Aug 19, 2022, 83 patients received 50-1000 mg ziftomenib (39 [47%] were male and 44 [53%] were female). Median follow-up was 22·3 months (IQR 15·4-30·2). Of 83 patients, the most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were anaemia (20 [24%]), febrile neutropenia (18 [22%]), pneumonia (16 [19%]), differentiation syndrome (12 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (11 [13%]), and sepsis (ten [12%]). Overall, 68 of 83 patients had serious adverse events, with two reported treatment-related deaths (one differentiation syndrome and one cardiac arrest). Differentiation syndrome rate and severity influenced the decision to halt enrolment of patients with KMT2A rearrangements. In Phase 1b, no responses were reported in patients treated at the 200 mg dose level. At the recommended phase 2 dose of 600 mg, nine (25%) of 36 patients with KMT2A rearrangement or NPM1 mutation had complete remission or complete remission with partial haematologic recovery. Seven (35%) of 20 patients with NPM1 mutation treated at the recommended phase 2 dose had a complete remission., Interpretation: Ziftomenib showed promising clinical activity with manageable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Phase 2 assessment of ziftomenib combination therapy in the upfront and relapsed or refractory setting is ongoing., Funding: Kura Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ESW declares honoraria for educational talks from Aptitude, Astellas, Bioascend, CEA, CCO, Curio Sciences, Dava Oncology, Medscape, MD Education, OncLive, PER, Peerview, RTP, and Pfizer; participation on Data Safety Monitoring Committees and research grant committees for AbbVie and Gilead; advisory board participation for Abbvie, Astellas, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunogen, Janssen, Jazz, Kite, Novartis, NuProbe, PharmaEssentia, Pfizer, Qiagen, Rigel, Schrodinger, Sumitomo, Syndax, and Takeda; other financial and non-financial interests with UptoDate; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. GCI declares research funding to their institution from Astex, Cullinan Oncology, Kura Oncology, Merck, Novartis, and Syndax Pharmaceuticals; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Kura Oncology, Novartis, and Syndax Pharmaceuticals; support for attending meetings and travel from Kura Oncology; steering committee role with Kura Oncology and Novartis; receipt of material for sample analysis from NuProbe; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. HPE declares a leadership role with AbbVie (Chair, Independent Review Committee for VIALE A and VIALE C), Bristol Myers Squibb (Chair, AML Registry Steering Committee), and Glycomimetics (Scientific Steering Committee); speakers bureau for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Jazz, Novartis, and Servier; contracted research from AbbVie, ALX Oncology, Amgen, Aptose, Ascentage, Daiichi Sankyo, Forma, Gilead, Glycomimetics, Immunogen, Jazz, Kura Oncology, MacroGenics, Novartis, PTC, and Sumitomo Pharma; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Glycomimetics, Incyte, Jazz, Kura Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Stemline, and Sumitomo Pharma; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. JKA declares a leadership role with the American Society of Hematology (guidelines panel), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (acute myeloid leukaemia panel vice-chair), and National Cancer Institute (co-chair on Leukemia Steering Committee); honoraria from Astellas, HMP Education, MD Education, and VJ HemOnc; advisory board role with AbbVie, Aptitude Health, Astellas, BlueBird Bio, Curio, Daiichi Sankyo, Dark Blue Therapeutics, Gilead, Kura Oncology, Kymera, Rigel, Stemline Therapeutics, Syros, and Treadwell Therapeutics; meeting attendance and travel expenses from Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, HMP Education, MD Education, and VJ HemOnc; medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology; and participation on a Data Safety Committee for Glycomimetics. PM declares consultancy fees from Kura Oncology and Syndax Pharmaceuticals and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. SDB declares honoraria from Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Menarini, and Servier; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Forma, Remix, Rigel, and Servier; travel expenses from Janssen, Pfizer, Rigel, and Servier; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. RBW declares clinical trial support from Kura Oncology and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. KP declares honoraria from Merck (investigator meeting lecture); advisory board role with AbbVie, Incyte, PharmaEssentia, Protagonist, and Sobi; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MRS declares research funding to institution from ALX Oncology, Astex, Incyte, Takeda, and TG Therapeutics; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI BioPharma, Forma, Geron, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Rigel, Ryvu, Taiho, and Treadwell; stock or stock options in Empath Bioscience, Karyopharm, and Ryvu; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MVS declares research grant to their institution from AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, Kura Oncology, and MRKR Therapeutics; travel expenses from Dava Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MK declares consultancy fees from AbbVie, CTI Biopharma, Incyte, and Protagonist; advisory board role with CTI BioPharma, Incyte, Kura Oncology, and Morphosys; travel expenses from Protagonist; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MRB declares research funding to their institution from AbbVie, Ascentage, Astellas, Gilead, Kura Oncology, and Takeda and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. JMF declares leadership role with National Cancer Institute Leukemia Steering Committee and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute national Myelodysplastic Syndrome Study Steering Committee; stock or stock options with Aurinia; honoraria from AmerisourceBergen/IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions, Aptitude Health, and MJH LifeSciences; consultancy fees from Autolus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Remix, and Syndax; grants to institution for clinical trial support from Actinium, Astellas, Celgene, Chordia, Kura Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Roivant, Sellas, and Servier; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. GS declares contracts through their institution from AbbVie, Actinium, Actuate, Agios, Arog, Astellas, AlloVir, Amgen, Aptevo, AltruBio, AVM Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; BioMea, Biopath, Biosight, Cellularity, Celator, Constellation, Cogent, Cellectis, Cullinan, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Delta-Fly, Fate, Forma, FujiFilm, Gamida, Genentech-Roche, Rigel Glycomimetics, Geron, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz, Karyopharm, Kite/Gilead, Kronos Bio, Kura Oncology, Immunogene, ImmuneOnc, Loxo, Marker, Mateon, Novartis, Onconova, Ono-UK, Orca, Pfizer, PrECOG, Regimmune, Samus, Sangamo, Sellas, Stemline, Syros, Takeda, Tolero, and Trovagene; consultancy fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Curios, Daiichi, and Novartis; speakers bureau role for AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, Blueprint Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Karyopharm, GlaxoSmithKline, Kite (Gilead), Jazz, Rigel, Seattle genetics, and Stemline; board or advisory committee membership for Agios, Autolus, AVM Biotech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gamida, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Novartis, Orca, Rigel, and Stemline; board of trustees membership for Leukemia Lymphoma Society Los Angeles; secretary or treasurer membership for the American Society of Hematology Research Collaborative Board of Directors; and holds stock with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. LA declares research funding to institution from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. ER declares consulting fees from Astellas and Laboratories Delbert; honoraria from AbbVie, Astellas, Eurocept, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; support for attending meetings and travel from AbbVie, Gilead, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MMP declares research funding to institution from Epigenetix, Kura Oncology, Polaris, Solutherapeutics, and Stem Line Pharma; medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology; and Data Safety Monitoring Boards with CTI Biopharma. CP declares honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Laboratories Delbert, Menarini-Stemline, Novartis, Paladin Labs, Pfizer, and Servier; travel expenses from AbbVie, Amgen and Pfizer; medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology; and Data Safety Monitoring Board or advisory board membership for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Blueprint, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Laboratories Delbert, Paladin Labs, and Pfizer. JG declares research support to institution, consultancy fees, royalties, patents, and stock with Kura Oncology, and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. TC declares research support to institution and royalties from, and patents and owns stock with Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. BC, JR, BML, MH, PP, and OS declare medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. KN declares employment with Kura Oncology; received stock options from Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. AM declares employment with Kura Oncology; owns stock with Kura Oncology; patents and patent applications with Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. JMA declares employment and stock or stock options with and travel expenses from Kura Oncology, and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. MT declares employment with Kura Oncology; stock and restricted stock units with Kura Oncology; reimbursement for conference fees, hotels and travel expenses from Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. HSS declares employment, patents and patent applications, and owns stock with, Kura Oncology, and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. DC declares employment with Kura Oncology; stock or stock options with Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. ML declares employment, patents and patent applications, stock or stock options, support for attending meetings and travel, and other financial or non-financial interests with Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. SD declares employment, patents and patent applications, stock or stock options, and other financial or non-financial interests with Kura Oncology; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. ATF declares consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Autolus, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, EnClear, Forma, Genentech, Gilead, Immunogen, Ipsen, Kite, Mablytics, Menarini, Novartis, Orum, Pfizer, PureTech, Remix, Rigel, Servier, and Takeda; clinical trial support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Servier; and medical writing support for this work from Kura Oncology. CB declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Cytogenomic characterization is crucial for the classification and risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), thereby facilitating therapeutic decision-making. We examined the clinical utility of optical genome mapping (OGM) in 159 AML patients (103 newly diagnosed and 56 refractory/relapsed), all of whom also underwent chromosomal banding analysis (CBA), fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted next-generation sequencing. OGM detected nearly all clinically relevant cytogenetic abnormalities that SCG identified with >99% sensitivity, provided the clonal burden was above 20%. OGM identified additional cytogenomic aberrations and/or provided information on fusion genes in 77 (48%) patients, including eight patients with normal karyotypes and four with failed karyotyping. The most common additional alterations identified by OGM included chromoanagenesis (n = 23), KMT2A partial tandem duplication (n = 11), rearrangements involving MECOM (n = 7), NUP98 (n = 2), KMT2A (n = 2), JAK2 (n = 2), and other gene fusions in 17 patients, with 10 showing novel fusion gene partners. OGM also pinpointed fusion genes in 17 (11%) patients where chromosomal rearrangements were concurrently detected by OGM and CBA. Overall, 24 (15%) aberrations were identified exclusively by OGM and had the potential to alter AML classification, risk stratification, and/or clinical trial eligibility. OGM emerges as a powerful tool for identifying fusion genes and detecting subtle or cryptic cytogenomic aberrations that may otherwise remain undetectable by CBA., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Ponatinib is a third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust activity in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. Herein, we report the long-term follow-up of the phase 2 trial of ponatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase., Methods: Patients received ponatinib 30 to 45 mg/day. The primary end point was the rate of 6-month complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). The study was held in June 2014 because of the risk of cardiovascular toxicity, requiring patients to change TKI., Results: Fifty-one patients were treated with ponatinib (median dose, 45 mg/day). Median age was 48 years (range, 21-75); 30 (59%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. Median treatment duration was 13 months (range, 2-25). Fourteen patients (28%) discontinued ponatinib because of toxicities, 36 (71%) after the Food and Drug Administration warning/study closure, and one for noncompliance. Dasatinib was the most frequently chosen second-line TKI (n = 34; 66%). Among 46 patients evaluable at 6 months, 44 (96%) achieved CCyR, 37 (80%) major molecular response, 28 (61%) MR4, and 21 (46%) MR4.5. The cumulative 6-month rates of CCyR, major molecular response, MR4, and MR4.5 were 96%, 78%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. Durable MR4 ≥24 or ≥60 months was observed in 67% and 51% of patients, respectively. The 24-month event-free survival rate was 97%. After a median follow-up of 128 months, the 10-year overall survival rate was 90%. Eight patients (16%) had serious grade 2 to 3 cardiovascular adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation in five (10%)., Conclusion: Ponatinib yielded high cytogenetic and molecular responses in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. Its use in the frontline setting is hindered by arterio-/vaso-occlusive and other severe toxicities., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Aberrant expression of HOX and MEIS1 family genes, as seen in KMT2A-rearranged, NUP98-rearranged, or NPM1-mutated leukemias leads to arrested differentiation and leukemia development. HOX family genes are essential gatekeepers of physiologic hematopoiesis, and their expression is regulated by the interaction between KMT2A and menin. Menin inhibitors block this interaction, downregulate the abnormal expression of MEIS1 and other transcription factors and thereby release the differentiation block. Menin inhibitors show significant clinical efficacy against KMT2A-rearranged and NPM1-mutated acute leukemias, with promising potential to address unmet needs in various pediatric leukemia subtypes. In this collaborative initiative, pediatric and adult hematologists/oncologists, and stem cell transplant physicians have united their expertise to explore the potential of menin inhibitors in pediatric leukemia treatment internationally. Our efforts aim to provide a comprehensive clinical overview of menin inhibitors, integrating preclinical evidence and insights from ongoing global clinical trials. Additionally, we propose future international, inclusive, and efficient clinical trial designs, integrating pediatric populations in adult trials, to ensure broad access to this promising therapy for all children and adolescents with menin-dependent leukemias., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) need long-term therapy with high efficacy and safety. Asciminib, a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket, may offer better efficacy and safety and fewer side effects than currently available frontline ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Methods: In a phase 3 trial, patients with newly diagnosed CML were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either asciminib (80 mg once daily) or an investigator-selected TKI, with randomization stratified by European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival score category (low, intermediate, or high risk) and by TKI selected by investigators before randomization (including imatinib and second-generation TKIs). The primary end points were major molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 transcript levels ≤0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) at week 48, for comparisons between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs and between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs in the prerandomization-selected imatinib stratum., Results: A total of 201 patients were assigned to receive asciminib and 204 to receive investigator-selected TKIs. The median follow-up was 16.3 months in the asciminib group and 15.7 months in the investigator-selected TKI group. A major molecular response at week 48 occurred in 67.7% of patients in the asciminib group, as compared with 49.0% in the investigator-selected TKI group (difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6 to 28.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001]), and in 69.3% of patients in the asciminib group as compared with 40.2% in the imatinib group within the imatinib stratum (difference, 29.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.9 to 42.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a major molecular response at week 48 was 66.0% with asciminib and 57.8% with TKIs in the second-generation TKI stratum (difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to 21.5). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher and events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen were less frequent with asciminib (38.0% and 4.5%, respectively) than with imatinib (44.4% and 11.1%) and second-generation TKIs (54.9% and 9.8%)., Conclusions: In this trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs and imatinib, asciminib showed superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Direct comparison between asciminib and second-generation TKIs was not a primary objective. (Funded by Novartis; ASC4FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04971226)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Purpose: Revumenib, an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the menin-lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) interaction, showed promising efficacy and safety in a phase I study of heavily pretreated patients with KMT2A -rearranged ( KMT2Ar ) acute leukemia. Here, we evaluated the activity of revumenib in individuals with relapsed/refractory (R/R) KMT2Ar acute leukemia., Methods: AUGMENT-101 is a phase I/II, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study of revumenib conducted across 22 clinical sites in five countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04065399). We report results from the phase II, registration-enabling portion. Individuals age ≥30 days with R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia or with AML and nucleophosmin 1 ( NPM1 ) mutation were enrolled. Revumenib was administered once every 12 hours, at 163 mg (95 mg/m 2 if weight <40 kg) with a strong cytochrome P450 inhibitor, in 28-day cycles. The primary end points were the rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CR + CRh) and safety. At a prespecified interim analysis, safety was assessed in all KMT2Ar treated patients; efficacy was assessed in those with centrally confirmed KMT2Ar . The separate NPM1 cohort of the trial is ongoing., Results: From October 1, 2021, to July 24, 2023, N = 94 patients (median [range] age, 37 [1.3-75] years) were treated. Grade ≥3 adverse events included febrile neutropenia (37.2%), differentiation syndrome (16.0%), and QTc prolongation (13.8%). In the efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 57), the CR + CRh rate was 22.8% (95% CI, 12.7 to 35.8), exceeding the null hypothesis of 10% ( P = .0036). Overall response rate was 63.2% (95% CI, 49.3 to 75.6), with 15 of 22 patients (68.2%) having no detectable residual disease., Conclusion: Revumenib led to high remission rates with a predictable safety profile in R/R KMT2Ar acute leukemia. To our knowledge, this trial represents the largest evaluation of a targeted therapy for these patients.

Background: The dual inhibition of the BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase and BCL-2 could potentially deepen the response rates of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of dasatinib and venetoclax., Methods: In this phase 2 trial, patients with CML-CP or accelerated phase (clonal evolution) received dasatinib 50 mg/day for three courses; venetoclax was added in course 4 for 3 years. The initial venetoclax dose was 200 mg/day continuously but reduced later to 200 mg/day for 14 days, and to 100 mg/day for 7 days per course once a molecular response (MR)4.5 was achieved. After 3 years of combination, patients were maintained on single-agent dasatinib. The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months of combination., Results: Sixty-five patients were treated. Their median age was 46 years (range, 23-73). By 12 months of combination, the MMR, MR4, and MR4.5 rates were 86%, 53%, and 45%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 4-year event-free and overall survival rates were 96% and 100%, respectively. Outcomes with the combination were comparable to historical outcomes with single-agent dasatinib (cumulative 12-months MMR rate of 79% with both strategies). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 22% with the combination and 11% with single-agent dasatinib (p < .001)., Conclusions: Treatment with dasatinib and venetoclax was safe and effective in CML-CP. The cumulative response rates with the combination were similar to those with single-agent dasatinib. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the rates of durable deep molecular response and treatment-free remission., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Patients with leukemia experience profound immunosuppression both from their underlying disease as well as chemotherapeutic treatment. Little is known about the prevalence and clinical presentation of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in this patient population. We identified six cases of NTM infection from 29,743 leukemia patients who had acid-fast bacilli (AFB) cultures. Four cases had bloodstream infections and five had disseminated disease, including one who presented with an unusual case of diffuse cellulitis/myositis. All patients were lymphopenic at time of diagnosis, and two patients ultimately died from their NTM infection. NTM infections are a rare, but potentially life-threatening infection in patients with leukemia. Sending AFB cultures early is important to direct appropriate antimicrobial therapy and allow for future leukemia-directed therapy., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (Copyright © 2024 Marvin-Peek, Sasaki, Kontoyiannis, Adachi, Ohanian, Takahashi, Issa, Kornblau and Abbas.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In this analysis, we update our experience with the chemotherapy-free regimen of blinatumomab and ponatinib in 60 patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the complete molecular response rate by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was 83% (67% at the end of course one), and the rate of measurable residual disease negativity by next-generation clono-sequencing was 98% (45% at the end of course one). Only two patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Seven patients relapsed: two with systemic disease, four with isolated CNS relapse, and one with extramedullary Ph-negative, CRLF2-positive pre-B ALL. The estimated 3-year overall survival rate was 91% and event-free survival rate was 77%. Three patients discontinued blinatumomab because of adverse events (related, n = 1; unrelated, n = 2) and nine discontinued ponatinib because of cerebrovascular ischemia, coronary artery stenosis, persistent rash, elevated liver function tests with drug-induced fatty liver, atrial thrombus, severe arterial occlusive disease of lower extremities, pleuro-pericardial effusion, and debilitation. In conclusion, the simultaneous combination of ponatinib and blinatumomab is a highly effective and relatively safe nonchemotherapy regimen. This regimen also reduces the need for intensive chemotherapy and HSCT in first remission in the majority of patients.

An increasing number of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapeutics have been developed, not as cytotoxic therapies, but rather as targeted agents able to restore the aberrant and leukemogenic "block" in normal differentiation. All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) are classic examples of differentiating agents for treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); newer therapies functioning through differentiation include isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 inhibitors, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors, and menin inhibitors. The terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts via differentiating agent therapy can lead to a constellation of signs and symptoms, originally referred to as "retinoic acid syndrome" and now termed "differentiation syndrome" (DS), characterized predominantly by systemic inflammatory response system (SIRS)-like features of dyspnea, pulmonary infiltrates, pleural and pericardial effusions, unexplained fevers, hypotension, edema, and renal insufficiency. DS in patients with newly diagnosed APL is generally straightforward to identify, however DS in patients with multiply relapsed AML can be more challenging to diagnose, due to non-specific signs and symptoms which can be mistakenly attributed to infectious etiologies or the underlying refractory leukemia itself. Prompt consideration of DS, rapid initiation of systemic corticosteroids, and early cytoreduction in the setting of concomitant hyperleukocytosis, are essential for optimal management., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

The treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is evolving rapidly. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy or doublets or triplets with targeted or immune therapies is the focus of numerous ongoing trials. The development of mutation-targeted therapies has greatly enhanced the treatment armamentarium, with FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors improving outcomes in frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) AML, and menin inhibitors showing efficacy in RR NPM1 mut and KMT2A-rearranged AML. With so many new drugs approved, the number of potential combinatorial approaches to leverage the maximal benefit of these agents has increased dramatically, while at the same time introducing clinical challenges, such as key preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of combinatorial therapy, how to optimally combine or sequence these novel agents, how to optimise dose and duration to maintain safety while enhancing efficacy, the optimal duration of therapy and the role of measurable residual disease in decision-making in both intensive and low-intensity therapy settings. In this review, we will outline the evidence leading to the approval of key agents in AML, their on-label current approvals and how they may be optimally combined in a safe and deliverable fashion to further improve outcomes in AML., (© 2024 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Ivosidenib is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4; however, it induces CYP450 isozymes, including CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, whereas it inhibits drug transporters, including P-glycoprotein. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia are at risk of invasive fungal infections, and therefore posaconazole and voriconazole are commonly used in this population. Voriconazole is a substrate of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4; therefore, concomitant ivosidenib may result in decreased serum concentrations. Although posaconazole is a substrate of P-glycoprotein, it is metabolized primarily via UDP glucuronidation; thus, the impact of ivosidenib on posaconazole exposure is unknown., Methods: Patients treated with ivosidenib and concomitant triazole with at least one serum trough level were included. Subtherapeutic levels were defined as posaconazole <700 ng/mL and voriconazole <1.0 µg/mL. The incidences of breakthrough invasive fungal infections and QTc prolongation were identified at least 5 days after initiation of ivosidenib with concomitant triazole., Results: Seventy-eight serum triazole levels from 31 patients receiving ivosidenib-containing therapy and concomitant triazole were evaluated. Of the 78 concomitant levels, 47 (60%) were subtherapeutic (posaconazole: n = 20 of 43 [47%]; voriconazole: n = 27 of 35 [77%]). Compared to levels drawn while patients were off ivosidenib, median triazole serum levels during concomitant ivosidenib were significantly reduced. There was no apparent increase in incidence of grade 3 QTc prolongation with concomitant azole antifungal and ivosidenib 500 mg daily., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that concomitant ivosidenib significantly reduced posaconazole and voriconazole levels. Voriconazole should be avoided, empiric high-dose posaconazole (>300 mg/day) may be considered, and therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in all patients receiving concomitant ivosidenib., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Targeted therapy development for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) requires an understanding of specific expression profiles. We collected flow cytometry data on 901 AML patients and recorded aberrant CD7 expression on leukaemic blasts. 263 (29.2%) had blasts positive for CD7. CD7+ AML was more likely to be adverse risk (64.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.0074) and less likely to be favourable risk (15.2% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.0074) by European LeukemiaNet 2022 criteria. Overall survival was inferior (11.9 [95% CI, 9.7-15.9] vs. 19.0 months [95% CI, 16.1-23.0], p = 0.0174). At relapse, 30.4% lost and 19.0% gained CD7, suggesting moderate instability over time., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: An inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment contributes to acquired bone marrow failure syndromes. CK0801, an allogeneic T regulatory (Treg) cell therapy product, can potentially interrupt this continuous loop of inflammation and restore hematopoiesis., Methods: In this phase 1 dose-escalation study of CK0801 Treg cells, we enrolled patients with bone marrow failure syndromes with suboptimal response to their prior therapy to determine the safety and efficacy of this treatment for bone marrow failure syndromes., Results: We enrolled nine patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 19 to 74) with an underlying diagnosis of aplastic anemia (n=4), myelofibrosis (n=4), or hypoplastic myelodysplasia (n=1). Patients had a median of three prior therapies for a bone marrow failure syndrome. Starting dose levels of CK0801 were 1 × 10 6 (n=3), 3 × 10 6 (n=3), and 10 × 10 6 (n=3) cells per kg of ideal body weight. No lymphodepletion was administered. CK0801 was administered in the outpatient setting with no infusion reactions, no grade 3 or 4 severe adverse reactions, and no dose-limiting toxicity. At 12 months, CK0801 induced objective responses in three of four patients with myelofibrosis (two had symptom response, one had anemia response, and one had stable disease) and three of four patients with aplastic anemia (three had partial response). Three of four transfusion-dependent patients at baseline achieved transfusion independence. Although the duration of observation was limited at 0.9 to 12 months, there were no observed increases in infections, no transformations to leukemia, and no deaths., Conclusions: In previously treated patients, CK0801 demonstrated no dose-limiting toxicity and showed evidence of efficacy, providing proof of concept for targeting inflammation as a therapy for bone marrow failure. (Funded by Cellenkos Inc.; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03773393.).

Purpose: Azacitidine plus venetoclax is a standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, FLT3 mutations are a common mechanism of resistance to this regimen. The addition of gilteritinib, an oral FLT3 inhibitor, to azacitidine and venetoclax may improve outcomes in patients with FLT3 -mutated AML., Methods: This phase I/II study evaluated azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib in two cohorts: patients with (1) newly diagnosed FLT3 -mutated AML who were unfit for intensive chemotherapy or (2) relapsed/refractory FLT3 -mutated AML (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04140487). The primary end points were the maximum tolerated dose of gilteritinib (phase I) and the combined complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate (phase II)., Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled (frontline [n = 30]; relapsed/refractory [n = 22]). The recommended phase II dose was gilteritinib 80 mg once daily in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax. In the frontline cohort, the median age was 71 years and 73% of patients had an FLT3 -internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation. The CR/CRi rate was 96% (CR, 90%; CRi, 6%). Sixty-five percent of evaluable patients achieved FLT3 -ITD measurable residual disease <5 × 10 -5 within four cycles. With a median follow-up of 19.3 months, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) have not been reached and the 18-month RFS and OS rates are 71% and 72%, respectively. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, the CR/CRi rate was 27%; nine additional patients (41%) achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state. The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic adverse events were infection (62%) and febrile neutropenia (38%), which were more frequent in the relapsed/refractory cohort., Conclusion: The combination of azacitidine, venetoclax, and gilteritinib resulted in high rates of CR/CRi, deep FLT3 molecular responses, and encouraging survival in newly diagnosed FLT3 -mutated AML. Myelosuppression was manageable with mitigative dosing strategies.

Background: Hypomethylating agents are approved in higher-riskmyelodysplastic syndromes. The combination of a hypomethylating agent with venetoclax is standard of care in acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the safety and activity of the first totally oral combination of decitabine plus cedazuridine and venetoclax in patients with higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia., Methods: We did a single-centre, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1/2, clinical trial. Patients with treatment-naive higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (risk level categorised as intermediate-2 or higher by the International Prognostic Scoring System) with excess blasts (>5%). Treatment consisted of oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg on days 1-5 and venetoclax (variable doses of 100-400 mg, day 1 to 14, 28-day cycle). The primary outcomes were safety for the phase 1 part and the overall response for the phase 2 part of the study. The trial is ongoing and this analysis was not prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04655755, and is currently enrolling participants., Findings: Between Jan 21, 2021, and Jan 20, 2023, we enrolled 39 patients (nine in phase 1 and 30 in phase 2). The median age was 71 years (range 27-94), 28 (72%) patients were male, and 11 (28%) were female. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the recommended phase 2 dose was established as oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg for 5 days and venetoclax (400 mg) for 14 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [85%] of 39), neutropenia (29 [74%]), and febrile neutropenia (eight [21%]). Four non-treatment-related deaths occurred on the study drugs due to sepsis (n=2), lung infection (n=1), and undetermined cause (n=1). The median follow-up time was 10·8 months (IQR 5·6-16·4). The overall response rate was 95% (95% CI 83-99; 37/39). 19 (49%) patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation., Interpretation: This early analysis suggests that the combination of oral decitabine plus cedazuridine with venetoclax for higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia is safe in most patients, with encouraging activity. Longer follow-up will be needed to confirm these data., Funding: MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech/AbbVie, and Astex Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GM-B declares research support from Takeda, Rigel, and IFN Therapeutics. KSC declares research funding from Amgen and consultancy fees from AbbVie. JI declares funding from the US National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia Research Foundation, and the US Department of Defense, and honoraria from AstraZeneca. KS declares consultancy fees from Novartis and honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Amgen. NS declares grants from Takeda Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Xencor, Stemline Therapeutics, and Nexcure; consultancy fees from Pfizer, GSK, NKARTA, and Sanofi; and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechologies, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, and BeiGene. GCI declares consultancy fees from Novartis, Kura Oncology, and Nuprobe; and research funding from Celgene, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Merck, Cullinan, and Novartis. ND declares grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, and KITE; and consultancy fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS, Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Arog, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Syndax, Shattuck Labs, Agios, KITE, and Stemline/Menarini. TMK declares grants from BMS, Abbvie, Amgen, Ascentage Pharma Group, Astellas Pharma, DrenBio, Astex, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Incyte, Cellenkos, Cyclacel, Delta-Fly Pharma, Genentech, Genfleet, Glycomimetics, Iterion, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Pulmotect, Regeneron, and SELLAS; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, PinotBio, Pukmotect, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier; and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, DAVA Oncology, Delta-Fly, DrenBio, Genentech, Genfleet, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Sanofi-Aventis, SELLAS, and Servier. FR declares research funding from ASTEX and TAIHO. EJ received research grants from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Pfizer, and Takeda; and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. HMK declares research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunogen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; and honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Amphista, Ascentage, Astellas, Biologix, Curis, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Labcorp, Novartis, Pfizer, Precision Biosciences, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline, and Takeda. GG-M declares research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Abbvie, BMS, Genentech, Aprea Therapeutics, Curis, and Gilead Sciences; consultancy fees from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, and BMS; and honoraria from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Abbvie, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Curis, Genentech, and BMS. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax (Ven) represent the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classifications have been validated for patients treated with intensive therapy. In this study, we validate a recently proposed new molecular prognostic risk signature (mPRS) for patients with AML treated with HMAs and Ven. This classification allocated patients to favorable, intermediate (N/KRAS or FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutations), and lower (TP53 mutations) benefit groups. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients treated with HMA and Ven. The mPRS classification allocated 74 (47%), 31 (19%), and 54 (34%) patients to the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively. The overall response rate was 71% (86%, 54%, and 59% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) times were 30 and 19 months, respectively, in the higher-benefit group; 12 and 8 months in the intermediate-benefit group; and 5 and 4 months in the lower-benefit group (P < .001). The C-index for OS and EFS was higher when stratifying patients according to mPRS classification than with the ELN 2022 classification. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 35%, 70%, and 60% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively (P = .005). The mPRS classification accurately segregated groups of patients with AML treated with HMA plus Ven. In these patients, N/KRAS and TP53 mutations appear to negatively affect outcomes; therefore, new treatment approaches are warranted., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Mutations in splicing factor (SF) genes SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, and ZRSR2 are now considered adverse risk in the European LeukemiaNet 2022 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk stratification. The prognostic impact of SF mutations in AML has been predominantly derived from younger patients treated with intensive (INT) therapy. We evaluated 994 patients with newly diagnosed AML, including 266 (27%) with a SFmut. Median age was 67 years overall, with patients with SFmut being older at 72 years. SRSF2 (n = 140, 53%) was the most common SFmut. In patients treated with INT, median relapse-free survival (RFS) (9.6 vs 21.4 months, P = .04) and overall survival (OS) (15.9 vs 26.7 months, P = .06) were shorter for patients with SFmut than without SFwt, however this significance abrogated when evaluating patients who received venetoclax with INT therapy (RFS 15.4 vs 20.3 months, P = .36; OS 19.6 vs 30.7 months, P = .98). In patients treated with LI, median RFS (9.3 vs 7.7 months, P = .35) and OS (12.3 vs 8.5 months, P = .14) were similar for patients with and without SFmut , and outcomes improved in all groups with venetoclax. On multivariate analysis, SFmut did not affect hazards of relapse and death for INT arm but reduced both these hazards in LI arm. In a large AML data set with >60% of patients receiving venetoclax with LI/INT therapy, SFmut had no independent negative prognostic impact. Newer prognostic models that consider LI therapy and use of venetoclax among other factors are warranted., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) is a haematological disorder with high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). To characterize the phenotypic and genomic patterns of CMML progression, we evaluated a cohort of 189 patients with AML evolving from CMML. We found that transformation occurs through distinct trajectories characterized by genomic profiles and clonal evolution: monocytic (Mo-AML, 53%), immature myeloid (My-AML, 43%) or erythroid (Ery-AML, 2%). Mo-AML, characterized by expansion of monoblasts and promonocytes (low CD34, CD117 expression; high CD14, CD33, CD56 and CD64 expression), were defined by SRSF2, TET2 and RAS pathway mutation co-dominance and were more likely to evolve from SRSF2-TET2 co-mutant CMML through emergence/expansion of RAS pathway mutant clones. Conversely, My-AML, characterized by expansion of immature myeloid blasts (high frequency of CD34, CD38, CD117; low frequency of CD14, CD64 and CD56 expression) were less likely to exhibit SRSF2-TET2 co-mutations or RAS pathway mutations and had higher frequency of CEBPA mutations. Ery-AML was defined by complex karyotypes and TP53 mutations. A trend towards improved OS and EFS with hypomethylating agent-venetoclax combination was observed in My-AML, but not Mo-AML. These findings define distinct progression of CMML and set the basis for future studies evaluating the role of phenotype-specific therapeutics., (© 2023 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal. On the basis of both extensive preclinical data and emerging clinical data, treatment with bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors (BETi) is a potential approach for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies., Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase I trial to study the safety and efficacy of PLX51107 (BETi) and azacitidine combination therapy in patients with R/R AML and high-risk (HR) MDS and studied mechanisms of resistance to the combination therapy., Results: Thirty-seven patients with HR R/R MDS (n = 4) and R/R AML (n = 33) were treated. Sixteen patients (43%) had MECOM gene rearrangement and 7 other patients had TP53 mutation. Median prior number of therapies was three (range 1-9); 97% had received prior hypomethylating agent and 84% prior venetoclax. Overall response rate was 8/37 (22%): complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (n = 1); morphologic leukemia-free state (n = 2); hematologic improvement (n = 5). The most common nonhematologic toxicities were febrile neutropenia and pneumonia in 12 (32%) patients each; 6 patients (17%) had severe hyperbilirubinemia. RNA-sequencing analysis of mononuclear cells harvested on treatment (day 3) versus pretreatment showed significant changes in mRNA expressions in responders: downregulation of MYC, BCL2, IL7R, and CDK6 and upregulation of HEXIM1, CD93, DCXR, and CDKN1A. Immunoblot analyses confirmed reduction in protein levels of c-Myc, CDK6, BCL2, and BCL-xL, and induction of BRD4 and HEXIM1 protein levels in responders., Conclusions: In a heavily pretreated patient cohort with R/R MDS and AML, PLX51107+ azacitidine was well-tolerated and resulted in modest clinical benefit., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Improvements in prevention, early detection, and effective cancer therapy have decreased cancer-related mortality; however, significant health disparities exist. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these disparities on survival., Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, we identified 784,341 patients with cancer between 1990 and 2016 in Georgia, 68,493 between 1990 and 1999; 371,353 between 2000 and 2009; and 322,932 between 2010 and 2016. We assessed the overall survival (OS) of patients with all cancers, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and lung cancer, given the dramatic improvement in outcomes in patients with CML since 2000 compared to the generally considerably worse outcomes in lung cancer. In addition, we assessed the distance from each county to the Georgia Cancer Center (GCC) or the National Cancer Institute-designated Cancer Center (NCI-CC)., Results: The 5-year OS of patients with any cancer was 55%, and the 5-year OS of each county ranged from 33% to 82% (interquartile range, 51%-65%) (P < .001). In patients with lung cancer and CML, the 5-year OS rates were 15% and 52%, respectively. The geographic differences between counties were relatively small and constant over time for patients with lung cancer. However, geographic differences were more prominent in patients with CML and widened after the introduction of modern therapies. Multivariate Cox regression showed that age, median county income, race, and distance to GCC or NCI-CC were predictive factors., Conclusions: Significant disparities in cancer care exist among geographic locations. Geographic differences in survival appear more prominent when highly effective therapies are available., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

DDX41 is the most frequently mutated gene in myeloid neoplasms associated with germline predisposition including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We analyzed 3795 patients with myeloid neoplasms and identified 151 (4%) with DDX41 variants and a diagnosis of AML (n = 96), MDS (n = 52), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 3). The most frequent DDX41 variants were the somatic variant p.R525H, followed by the germline variants p.M1I and p.D140fs. Most neoplasms had a normal karyotype (59%) and the most frequent co-mutations were TP53 (16%) and ASXL1 (15%). 30% of patients had no concomitant mutations besides DDX41 mutation. Patients with myeloid malignancies and DDX41 variants responded well to therapy, with an overall response rate for patients with treatment naïve AML and MDS of 87% and 84%, respectively. The median overall survival (mOS) of patients with treatment-naïve AML or MDS was 49 and 71 months, respectively. Patients with AML treated with low-intensity regimens including venetoclax had an improved survival (2-year OS 91% vs. 60%, p = .02) and lower cumulative incidence of relapse compared to those treated without venetoclax (10% vs. 56%, p = .03). In the 33% of patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the 2-year OS was 80% and 85% for AML and MDS, respectively., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Dasatinib is a BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as frontline therapy at a 100 mg daily for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). The use of a lower dose of dasatinib (50 mg daily) has demonstrated better tolerance and improved outcomes compared with the standard dose. Here, we report the updated results in a large cohort with a 5-year follow-up., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were eligible. Entry and response-outcome criteria were standard. Dasatinib was given as 50 mg orally daily., Results: Eighty-three patients were included. At 3 months, 78 (96%) patients achieved BCR::ABL1 transcripts (IS) ≤10%, and at 12 months, 65 (81%) patients achieved BCR::ABL1 transcript (IS) ≤0.1%. The cumulative incidence of complete cytogenetic, major molecular, and deep molecular responses at 5 years were 98%, 95%, and 82%, respectively. Rates of failures due to resistance (n = 4; 5%) and toxicity (n = 4; 5%) were low. The 5-year overall survival was 96% and event-free survival 90%. No transformations to accelerated or blastic phase were observed. Grade 3 to 4 pleural effusions developed in 2% of patients., Conclusion: Dasatinib 50 mg daily is an effective and safe treatment for newly diagnosed CML-CP., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and T315I mutation generally have a poor prognosis. Their outcome in the post-ponatinib era remains unclear. We reviewed patients with CML in chronic (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) who developed a T315I mutation between March 15, 2004, and July 26, 2022. Patients were divided into CP, AP, or blastic phase (BP) at the time of mutation detection. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the time of mutation detection to the date of death or last follow-up. We identified a total of 107 patients: 54 (51%) in CP, 14 (13%) in AP, and 39 (36%) in BP. One hundred and two patients received subsequent therapy after the T315I mutation was detected. At a median follow-up of 75 months (95% CI, 41-110), the median OS was 49 months (95% CI, 26-73) and the 5-year OS rate was 44%. Patients who were in CML-CP at the time of mutation detection had better survival compared with those in AP or BP, with a median OS of 132, 31, and 6 months, and 5-year OS rates of 70%, 37%, and 10%, respectively (p < .001). Patients with CML-CP treated with ponatinib and/or asciminib had a 5-year OS of 77% compared with 50% in those who received other treatments (chemotherapy, second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, homoharringtonine, and investigational drugs) (p = .14). In summary, patients with CML-CP at the time of T315I mutation detection may have a relatively indolent disease course with a long-term OS of 70%. Treatment with third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors seemed to improve survival in patients with CML-CP., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for BCR::ABL1 is the most common and widely accepted method of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL); however, RT-PCR may not be an optimal measure of MRD in many cases of Ph+ ALL. We evaluated the clinical impact of a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD assay (sensitivity of 10 -6 ) and its correlation with RT-PCR for BCR::ABL1 in patients with Ph+ ALL. Overall, 32% of patients had a discordance between MRD assessment by RT-PCR and NGS, and 31% of patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity were PCR+ at the same timepoint. Among eight patients with long-term detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, six were PCR+/NGS-. These patients generally had stable PCR levels that persisted despite therapeutic interventions, and none subsequently relapsed; in contrast, patients who were PCR+/NGS+ had more variable PCR values that responded to therapeutic intervention. In a separate cohort of prospectively collected clinical samples, 11 of 65 patients (17%) with Ph+ ALL who achieved NGS MRD negativity had detectable BCR::ABL1 by PCR, and none of these patients relapsed. Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar in patients who were PCR+/NGS- and PCR-/NGS-, suggesting that PCR for BCR::ABL1 did not provide additional prognostic information in patients who achieved NGS MRD negativity. NGS-based assessment of MRD is prognostic in Ph+ ALL and identifies patients with low-level detectable BCR::ABL1 who are unlikely to relapse nor to benefit from therapeutic interventions., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Although venetoclax-based lower-intensity regimens have greatly improved outcomes for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy, the optimal induction for older patients with newly diagnosed AML who are suitable candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the post HSCT outcomes of 127 patients ≥60 years of age who received induction therapy at our institution with intensive chemotherapy (IC; n = 44), lower-intensity therapy (LIT) without venetoclax (n = 29), or LIT with venetoclax (n = 54) and who underwent allogeneic HSCT in the first remission. The 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 60% with LIT with venetoclax vs 54% with IC, and 41% with LIT without venetoclax; the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 72% LIT with venetoclax vs 58% with IC, and 41% with LIT without venetoclax. The benefit of LIT with venetoclax induction was greatest in patients with adverse-risk AML (2-year OS: 74%, 46%, and 29%, respectively). Induction with LIT, with or without venetoclax, was associated with the lowest rate of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (2-year NRM: 17% vs 27% with IC; P = .04). Using multivariate analysis, the type of induction therapy did not significantly affect any of the post HSCT outcomes evaluated; hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index was the only factor that independently predicted RFS and OS. LIT plus venetoclax followed by HSCT is a feasible treatment strategy in older, fit, HSCT-eligible patients with newly diagnosed AML and may be particularly beneficial for those with adverse-risk disease., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Pevonedistat is a first-in-class, small molecular inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme that has clinical activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preclinical data suggest synergy of pevonedistat with azacitidine and venetoclax., Methods: This single-center, phase 1/2 study evaluated the combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat in older adults with newly diagnosed secondary AML or with MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) after failure of hypomethylating agents. Patients received azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 IV on days 1-7, venetoclax at maximum dose of 200-400 mg orally on days 1-21 (AML cohort) or days 1-14 (MDS/CMML cohort) and pevonedistat 20 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 3 and 5 for up to 24 cycles. The primary endpoints for the phase 2 portion of the study were the CR/CRi rate in the AML cohort and the overall response rate (CR + mCR + PR + HI) in the MDS/CMML cohort., Findings: Forty patients were enrolled (32 with AML and 8 with MDS/CMML). In the AML cohort, the median age was 74 years (range 61-86 years), and 27 patients (84%) had at least one adverse risk cyto-molecular feature, including 15 (47%) with a TP53 mutation or MECOM rearrangement; seventeen patients (53%) had received prior therapy for a preceding myeloid disorder. The CR/CRi rate was 66% (CR 50%; CRi 16%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months. In the MDS/CMML cohort, 7 patients (87%) were high or very high risk by the IPSS-R. The overall response rate was 75% (CR 13%; mCR with or without HI 50%; HI 13%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were infection in 16 patients (35%), febrile neutropenia in 10 patients (25%) and hypophosphatemia in 9 patients (23%). In an exploratory analysis, early upregulation of NOXA expression was observed, with subsequent decrease in MCL-1 and FLIP, findings consistent with preclinical mechanistic studies of pevonedistat. Upregulation of CD36 was observed, which may have contributed to therapeutic resistance., Conclusions: The triplet combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat shows encouraging activity in this very poor-risk population of patients with AML, MDS or CMML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03862157)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

In TP53 wild-type acute myeloid leukemia (AML), inhibition of MDM2 can enhance p53 protein expression and potentiate leukemic cell apoptosis. MDM2 inhibitor (MDM2i) monotherapy in AML has shown modest responses in clinical trials but combining options of MDM2i with other potent AML-directed agents like cytarabine and venetoclax could improve its efficacy. We conducted a phase I clinical trial (NCT03634228) to study the safety and efficacy of milademetan (an MDM2i) with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC)±venetoclax in adult patients with relapsed refractory (R/R) or newly diagnosed (ND; unfit) TP53 wild-type AML and performed comprehensive CyTOF analyses to interrogate multiple signaling pathways, the p53-MDM2 axis and the interplay between pro/anti-apoptotic molecules to identify factors that determine response and resistance to therapy. Sixteen patients (14 R/R, 2 N/D treated secondary AML) at a median age of 70 years (range, 23-80 years) were treated in this trial. Two patients (13%) achieved an overall response (complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery). Median cycles on trial were 1 (range 1-7) and at a median follow-up of 11 months, no patients remained on active therapy. Gastrointestinal toxicity was significant and dose-limiting (50% of patients ≥ grade 3). Single-cell proteomic analysis of the leukemia compartment revealed therapy-induced proteomic alterations and potential mechanisms of adaptive response to the MDM2i combination. The response was associated with immune cell abundance and induced the proteomic profiles of leukemia cells to disrupt survival pathways and significantly reduced MCL1 and YTHDF2 to potentiate leukemic cell death. The combination of milademetan, LDAC±venetoclax led to only modest responses with recognizable gastrointestinal toxicity. Treatment-induced reduction of MCL1 and YTHDF2 in an immune-rich milieu correlate with treatment response., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with rearrangement of lysine methyltransferase 2a gene (KMT2Ar) is characterized by chemotherapy resistance and high rates of relapse. However, additional causes of treatment failure or early mortality have not been well-defined in this entity., Methods: In a retrospective analysis, causes and rates of early mortality following induction treatment were compared between a cohort of adults with KMT2Ar AML (N = 172) and an age-matched cohort of patients with normal karyotype AML (N = 522)., Results: The 60-day mortality in patients with KMT2Ar AML was 15% compared with 7% with normal karyotype (p = .04). We found a significantly higher occurrence of major bleeding events (p = .005) and total bleeding events (p = .001) in KMT2Ar AML compared with diploid AML. Among evaluable patients with KMT2Ar AML, 93% exhibited overt disseminated intravascular coagulopathy compared with 54% of patients with a normal karyotype before death (p = .03). In a multivariate analysis, KMT2Ar and a monocytic phenotypic were the only independent predictors of any bleeding event in patients who died within 60 days (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-10.4; p = .03; odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1-1-9.4; p = .04, respectively)., Conclusion: In conclusion, early recognition and aggressive management of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy and coagulopathy are important considerations that could mitigate the risk of death during induction treatment in KMT2Ar AML., Plain Language Summary: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with rearrangement of KMT2A is characterized by chemotherapy resistance and high rates of relapse. However, additional causes of treatment failure or early mortality have not been well-defined in this entity. In this article, that KMT2A-rearranged AML is demonstrably associated with higher early mortality and an increased risk of bleeding and coagulopathy, specifically, disseminated intravascular coagulation, compared with normal karyotype AML. These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring and mitigating coagulopathy in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia similar to what is done in acute promyelocytic leukemia., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Bariatric surgery is the most effective weight loss intervention. However, it can also decrease the bioavailability of oral medications. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the mainstay treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), are the most successful example of an oral targeted therapy. The impact of bariatric surgery on CML outcomes is unknown., Methods: In a retrospective analysis, we screened 652 patients with CML and identified 22 with prior bariatric surgery, and compared their outcomes to a matched cohort of 44 patients with no prior bariatric surgery., Results: The rate of early molecular response (3-month BCR::ABL1 < 10% International Scale) was lower in the bariatric surgery group compared with the control group (68% vs. 91%; p = .05), with longer median times to achieve complete cytogenetic (6 vs. 3 months; p = .001) or major molecular responses (12 vs. 6 months; p = .001). Bariatric surgery was associated with inferior event-free survival (5-year, 60% vs. 77%; p = .004) and failure-free survival (5-year, 32% vs. 63%; p < .0001). In a multivariate analysis, bariatric surgery was the only independent predictor for the risk of treatment failure (hazard ratio, 9.40; 95% CI, 2.71-32.55; p = .0004) or event-free survival (hazard ratio, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.67-12.23; p = .008)., Conclusions: Bariatric surgery is associated with suboptimal responses that require adapted treatment strategies., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

With the improving knowledge of CML and its management, the goals of therapy need to be revisited to ensure an optimal use of the BCR::ABL1 TKIs in the frontline and later-line therapy of CML. In the frontline therapy of CML in the chronic phase (CML-CP), imatinib and the three second-generation TKIs (bosutinib, dasatinib and nilotinib) are associated with comparable survival results. The second-generation TKIs may produce earlier deep molecular responses, hence reducing the time to reaching a treatment-free remission (TFR). The choice of the second-generation TKI versus imatinib in frontline therapy is based on the treatment aims (survival, TFR), the CML risk, the drug cost, and the toxicity profile with respect to the patient's comorbidities. The TKI dosing is more flexible than has been described in the registration trials, and dose adjustments can be considered both in the frontline and later-line settings (e.g., dasatinib 50 mg frontline therapy; dose adjusted schedules of bosutinib and ponatinib), as well as during an ongoing TKI therapy to manage toxicities, before considering changing the TKI. In patients who are not candidates for TFR, BCR::ABL1 (International Scale) transcripts levels <1% are acceptable, result in virtually similar survival as with deeper molecular remissions, and need not warrant a change of TKI. For patients with true resistance to second-generation TKIs or with the T315I gatekeeper mutation, the third-generation TKIs are preferred. Ponatinib should be considered first because of the cumulative experience and results in the CML subsets, including in T315I-mutated CML. A response-based dosing of ponatinib is safe and leads to high TKI compliance. Asciminib is a third-generation TKI with possibly a better toxicity profile, but lesser activity in T315I-mutated CML. Olverembatinib is another potent third-generation TKI with early promising results., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Achieving major molecular response (MMR) with BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with lower chances of progression to advanced phase disease and higher chances of treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Failure to achieve this molecular milestone after 1 year has been highlighted as "suboptimal" or "warning" sign of treatment failure in CML guidelines and recommendations and implied to predict a poor long-term outcome. In this analysis, we report the long-term outcome of 131 patients who did not achieve MMR within the first 2 years of TKI therapy. Patients who achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR; roughly equivalent to BCR::ABL1 transcript levels on the International Scale [IS] <10%) had good long-term overall survival (OS) (10-year OS of 88%) and CML-related overall survival (CML-OS) (10-year CML-OS of 95%). The achievement of MCyR within the first 2 years of treatment predicted a better OS (HR = 0.43, p = .03). The value of MMR was even less pronounced among patients aged 60 years or older at diagnosis, in whom mortality was primarily due to comorbidities unrelated to CML (10-year OS of 55% vs. 10-year CML-OS of 100%). In conclusion, achievement of MCyR within 2 years is a reasonable milestone in CML, and these patients can still have good outcomes even when MMR is not achieved., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). After failing second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), the optimal third-line therapy in chronic phase CML (CML-CP) is not well established. We analyzed 354 patients with CML-CP treated with a third-line BCR::ABL1 TKI at our institution, and in the PACE and OPTIC trials, and evaluated the outcome after alternate 2G-TKIs or ponatinib. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to compare outcomes and multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with survival. One hundred seventy-three (49%) patients received 2G-TKIs and 181 (51%) ponatinib. Patients in the ponatinib group had more cardiovascular risk factors (34% versus 19%) and higher disease burden (BCR::ABL1 transcript levels >1%, 165/175 [94%] versus 75/135 [55%]; p < .001) compared with the 2G-TKI group. Among the 173 evaluable patients treated with ponatinib, 89 (52%) achieved 2 + -log reduction of baseline transcripts (20% 2-log reduction and 32% 3 + -log reduction). Among the 128 evaluable patients treated with 2G-TKIs, 44 (34%) achieved 2 + -log reduction of baseline transcripts (13% 2-log reduction and 21% 3 + -log reduction). With a median follow-up of 46 months, the 3-year progression-free survival was 59% (60% before matching) with 2G-TKI and 83% (81% before matching) with ponatinib (p < .001). The 3-year survival was 83% (81% before matching) with 2G-TKI and 87% (89% before matching) with ponatinib (p = .03). By multivariate analysis, third-line therapy with ponatinib was the only independent factor associated with better survival (p = .003). In conclusion, ponatinib is an optimal treatment for patients with CML-CP failing two prior TKIs., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)