Search

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical-mechanical behavior of the occlusal veneers when subjected to thermomechanical cycling., Materials and Methods: Sixty specimens were divided into 04 groups (n&#61;15 per group), according with the different restorative materials and thicknesses: material - lithium dissilicate LD (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) and nano- ceramic-resins NCR (ESPE Lava Ultimate, 3M); thickness - 0.6 and 1.2mm. The occlusal veneers were bonded over human flattened fresh extracted molars with dual-polymerizing luting agent (Variolink N, Ivoclar Vivadent and RelyX Ultimate 3M) using the respective adhesive system following the selective-etch technique (self-etch in dentin and total etch in enamel). The resin cement was light cured for 40 seconds each face, using a LED light cure equipment (BlueStar II, Microdont, 1100 mW/cm2). The response variables consisted of veneer survival rates (crack formation, catastrophic cracks and debonding) when subjected to thermal cycling from 5° to 55° C and simultaneous mechanical cycling performed at load intensities of 100, 200, 300, 400 and 450N for 20,000 cycles each., Result: Data were submitted to the Kruskall Wallis test and Pairwise Comparison, adopting a significance level of 5%. NCRs presented a lower incidence of failures (p<0.05) when compared to LD. According to thickness factor, 1.2mm thick occlusal veneers withstand higher cycling loads., Conclusion: NCR occlusal veneers with 1.2mm thickness presented superior physical-mechanical behavior than lithium disilicate and 0.6mm restorations.

This article presents a case report on diastema closure in anterior teeth with direct resin composite restoration. This suggested approach has been found to be efficient with regards to esthetics, marginal adaptation, and the quality of proximal contacts in diastema closure. These advantages are presented in this report., (©Operative Dentistry, 2021.)

This study evaluated the effect of the incorporation of bioactive nanofibers in desensitizing agents on dentin permeability. Sixty disks of dentin were randomly distributed in four groups ( n = 15). Distribution was based on the desensitizing agents, fluoride varnish and self-etching adhesive, and the presence of nanofibers: C (self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond), CN (Clearfil SE Bond with 1% nanofiber), D (Duraphat varnish), and DN (Duraphat varnish with 1% nanofiber). Dentin permeability was determined using hydraulic conductivity. For a qualitative analysis, confocal laser microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were performed. The C group showed the lowest hydraulic conductance (Lp%) (89.33), while the DN group showed the highest Lp% (116.06). No statistical significance was observed in the Lp% values in all groups after the treatment and 6% citric acid challenge ( p > 0.239). In the images, the CN group presented a higher superficial and intratubular deposition. In addition, this group presented a more homogeneous dentin surface and wide occlusion of dentinal tubules than the other treatments. Despite there being no statistical differences among the treatments employed, the images showed that the CN group presented a higher surface and intratubular deposition compared to the other treatments, even after the acid challenge.