Search

Introduction: The aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of additional hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) compared to standard care (SC) for ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) regarding limb salvage and health status., Methods: An economic analysis was conducted, comprising cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, with a 12-month time horizon, using data from the DAMO₂CLES multicentre randomised clinical trial. Cost-effectiveness was defined as cost per limb saved and cost-utility as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The difference in cost effectiveness between HBOT+SC and SC alone was determined via an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)., Results: One-hundred and twenty patients were included, with 60 allocated to HBOT+SC and 60 to SC. No significant cost difference was found in the intention-to-treat analysis: €3,791 (bias corrected and accelerated [BCA] 95% CI, €3,556 - €-11,138). Cost per limb saved showed an ICER of €37,912 (BCA 95% CI €-112,188 - €1,063,561) for HBOT+SC vs. SC. There was no significant difference in mean QALYs: 0.54 for HBOT+SC vs. 0.56 for SC alone (-0.02; BCA 95% CI -0.11-0.08). This resulted in a cost-utility of minus €227,035 (BCA 95% CI €-361,569,550 - €-52,588) per QALY. Subgroup analysis for Wagner stages III/IV showed an ICER of €19,005 (BCA 95%CI, -€18,487 - €264,334) while HBOT did not show any benefit for Wagner stage II., Conclusions: HBOT as an adjunct to SC showed no significant differences in costs and effectiveness for patients with DFUs regarding limb salvage and health status. However, for patients with Wagner stage III/IV ischaemic DFUs there was a trend towards better effectiveness and cost-effectiveness., Competing Interests: No conflicts of interest were declared., (Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.)

Background: Missed opportunities to reduce numbers of primary major lower-limb amputation and increase limb-salvage procedures when treating chronic limb-threatening ischaemia have previously been identified in the literature. However, the potential economic savings for healthcare providers when salvaging a chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-affected limb have not been well documented., Methods: A model using National Health Service healthcare usage and cost data for 1.6 million individuals and averaged numbers of primary surgical procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia from England and Wales in 2019-2021 was created to perform a budget impact analysis. Two scenarios were tested: the averaged national rates of major lower-limb amputation (above the ankle joint), angioplasty, open bypass surgery or arterial endarterectomy in the National Vascular Registry (current scenario); and revascularization rates adjusted based on the lowest amputation rate reported by the National Vascular Registry at the time of the study (hypothetical scenario). The primary outcome was the net impact on costs to the National Health Service over 12 months after the index procedure., Results: In the current scenario, the proportions of different index procedures were 10% for lower-limb major amputation, 55% for angioplasty, 25% for open bypass surgery and 10% for arterial endarterectomy. In the hypothetical scenario, the procedure rates were 3% for major lower-limb amputation, 59% for angioplasty, 27% for open bypass surgery and 11% for arterial endarterectomy. For 16 025 index chronic limb-threatening ischaemia procedures, the total care cost in the current scenario was €243 924 927. In the hypothetical scenario, costs would be reduced for index procedures (-€10 013 814), community care (-€633 943) and major cardiovascular events (-€383 407), and increased for primary care (€59 827), outpatient appointments (€120 050) and subsequent chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-related surgery (€1 179 107). The net saving to the National Health Service would be €9 645 259., Conclusion: A shift away from primary major lower-limb amputation towards revascularization could lead to substantial savings for the National Health Service without major cost increases later in the care pathway, indicating that care decisions taken in hospitals have wider benefits., (© Crown copyright 2024.)

Objective: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a major sequela of uncontrolled diabetes with a high risk of adverse outcomes. Poor DFU outcomes disproportionately impact patients living in rural and economically distressed communities with lack of access to consistent, quality care. This study aimed to analyze the risk of geographic and economic disparities, including rural status and county economic distress, on the disease burden of DFU at presentation utilizing the SVS WIfI classification system., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 454 patients diagnosed with a DFU from 2011 to 2020 at a single institution's inpatient and outpatient wound care service. Patients >18 years old, with type II diabetes mellitus, and diabetic foot ulcer were included., Results: ANCOVA analyses showed rural patients had significantly higher WIfI composite scores (F(1,451) = 9.61, p = .002), grades of wound (F(1,439) = 11.03, p = .001), and ischemia (F(1,380) = 12.574, p = .001) compared to the urban patients. Patients that resided in at-risk economic counties had significantly higher overall WIfI composite scores (F(2,448) = 3.31, p = .037) than patients who lived in transitional economic counties, and higher foot infection grading (F(2,440) = 3.02, p = .05) compared to patients who lived in distressed economic counties. DFU patients who resided in distressed economic counties presented with higher individual grades of ischemia (F(2, 377) = 3.14, p = .04) than patients in transitional economic counties. Chi-Square analyses demonstrated patients who resided in urban counties were significantly more likely to present with grade 1 wounds (χ2(3) = 9.86, p = .02) and grade 0 ischemia (χ2(3) = 16.18, p = .001) compared to patients in rural areas. Economically distressed patients presented with significantly less grade 0 ischemia compared to patients in transitional economic counties (χ2(6) = 17.48, p = .008)., Conclusions: Our findings are the first to demonstrate the impact of geographic and economic disparities on the disease burden of DFU at presentation utilizing the SVS WIfI classification system. This may indicate need for improved multidisciplinary primary care prevention strategies with vascular specialists in these communities to mitigate worsening DFU and promote early intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: People with peripheral artery disease are at a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Randomized controlled trials suggest that intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors is an effective strategy to prevent these events. This study estimated the potential benefit and cost-effectiveness of administrating PCSK9 inhibitors to a cohort of participants with peripheral artery disease., Methods: A total of 783 participants with intermittent claudication (IC; n = 582) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; n = 201) were prospectively recruited from three hospitals in Australia. Serum LDL-C was measured at recruitment, and the occurrence of MACE and MALE was recorded over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.2 years (0.3-5.7 years). The potential benefit of administering a PCSK9 inhibitor was estimated by calculating the absolute risk reduction and numbers needed to treat (NNT) based on relative risk reductions reported in published randomized trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year gained was estimated., Results: Intensive LDL-C lowering was estimated to lead to an absolute risk reduction in MACE of 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-9.3; NNT, 16) and MALE of 13.7% (95% CI, 4.3-21.5; NNT, 7) in people with CLTI compared with 3.2% (95% CI, 1.1-4.8; NNT, 32) and 5.3% (95% CI, 1.7-8.3; NNT, 19) in people with IC. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a 10-year period were $55,270 USD and $32,800 USD for participants with IC and CLTI, respectively., Conclusions: This analysis suggests that treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor is likely to be cost-effective in people with CLTI., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions often requires several interventional sessions to generate successful outcomes. It is typically an expensive procedure, necessitating extended hospital length of stay (LOS) that may be associated with an increase in both local and systemic hemorrhagic complications. Five years ago, we created the fast-track thrombolysis protocol for arteries (FTTP-A) to deal with these concerns. The goal of our protocol is to re-establish patency during the first session of thrombolysis, thus decreasing costs and complications associated with prolonged periods of thrombolytic exposure., Methods: A retrospective study of 42 patients who were treated for acute limb ischemia at our institution by FTTP-A from January 2014 to February 2019 was performed. FTTP-A includes periadventitial lidocaine injection at the arterial puncture site under ultrasound guidance, contrast arteriography of the entire targeted segment, pharmacomechanical rheolytic thrombectomy of the occluded arterial segment, tissue plasminogen activator infusion along the occluded segment, balloon maceration of the thrombus, and (if deemed necessary) placement of a stent in an area of significant (≥30%) stenosis that is refractory to balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis. After the stenosis or thrombus is cleared, patients are prescribed an oral anticoagulant agent., Results: Primary FTTP-A (50 total interventions) was performed in 42 patients. The median age of patients was 67.2 ± 12.2 years (range, 41-98 years), and 54.8% were male; 59.5% of the procedures were performed on the left lower extremity. Initial arterial access was obtained through the common femoral artery in 39 of 42 cases (92.9%); in the remaining 3 cases, it was obtained in a left bypass access site, a right femoral-popliteal graft, and a right femoral-femoral graft. The mean operative time was 148.9 ± 62.9 minutes (range, 83-313 minutes), and the mean volume of tissue plasminogen activator infused was 9.7 ± 4.0 mg (range, 2-20 mg). The median cost including medications and interventional tools was $4673.19 per procedure. The mean postoperative LOS was 3.1 ± 4.5 days (range, 1-25 days). Median postoperative LOS was 1 day. Mean postoperative follow-up was 27 ± 19.2 months (range, 0-62 months). Single-session FTTP-A was successful in 81% (n = 34/42) of patients; the remaining 8 patients (19%) required a single additional session. Of the 42 patients, 34 (81%) required arterial stenting. Periprocedural complications consisted of one patient with hematuria, which resolved, and one patient with thrombocytopenia, which resolved. No patients experienced rethrombosis within 30 days of FTTP-A. During the 5-year study period, there was no significant local or systemic hemorrhage, limb loss, or mortality related to this protocol., Conclusions: FTTP-A appears to be a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective procedure in the resolution of acute lower extremity arterial occlusions., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Percutaneous peripheral intervention (PPI) is often the first mode of therapy for patients with symptomatic arterial occlusive disease. Technical success generally remains high although "failure-to-cross" still complicates 5-20% of cases. Extended efforts to cross long, occlusive lesions can utilize significant hospital and practitioner resources. The hospital is typically reimbursed for this effort as facility fees are charged by the hour and materials are charged per use. However, given the lack of a CPT® code for "failure-to-cross," practitioners are rarely appropriately compensated. The purpose of this study is to analyze the predictors, technical details, outcomes, and costs of "failure-to-cross" during PPI., Methods: All PPI procedures over a 2-year period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics, results, costs, and reimbursements obtained from hospital cost accounting were compared among successful therapeutic interventions, crossing failures, and diagnostic angiograms without attempted intervention., Results: A total of 146 consecutive PPIs were identified; the rate of "failure-to-cross" was 11.6% (17 patients). The majority of patients with "failure-to-cross" were male (82%) with single-vessel runoff (53%). Compared to successful interventions, the incidences of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (82% vs. 70%, P = 0.34) and infrapopliteal occlusive disease were similar (47% vs. 31%, P = 0.20). "Failure-to-cross" procedures were just as long as successful procedures; there were no significant differences in fluoroscopy time (27 ± 10 vs. 24 ± 14 min, P = 0.52), in-room time (106 ± 98 vs. 103 ± 44 min, P = 0.84), or contrast dye volume utilization (73 ± 37 vs. 96 ± 54 mL, P = 0.12). As expected, "failure-to-cross" procedures incurred far higher hospital charges and costs compared to noninterventional diagnostic angiograms (charges $13,311 ± 6,067 vs. $7,690 ± 1,942, P < 0.01; costs $5,289 ± 2,099 vs. $2,826 ± 1,198, P < 0.01). Despite the additional time and effort spent attempting to cross difficult lesions, the operators were reimbursed at the same low rate as a purely diagnostic procedure (average fee charge $7,360; average reimbursement $992). After 1 year, the 17 patients in whom lesions could not be crossed were treated with advanced interventional procedures with success (n = 2), surgical bypass grafting (n = 5), extremity amputation (n = 4), or no additional intervention in their salvaged limb (n = 6)., Conclusions: Patients whose lesions cannot be crossed during PPI fare worse than patients undergoing successful interventions. Hospital costs and charges appropriately reflect the high technical difficulty and resource utilization of extended attempts at endovascular therapy. For practitioners, crossing lesions during PPI is truly a "pay-for-performance" procedure in that only successful procedures are reasonably reimbursed., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Worldwide, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a disease with high morbidity, affecting more than 200 million people. Our objective was to analyze the surgical treatment for PAD performed in the Unified Health System of the city of São Paulo during the last 11 years based on publicly available data., Methods: The study was conducted with data analysis available on the TabNet platform, belonging to the DATASUS. Public data (government health system) from procedures performed in São Paulo between 2008 and 2018 were extracted. Sex, age, municipality of residence, operative technique, number of surgeries (total and per hospital), mortality during hospitalization, mean length of stay in the intensive care unit and amount paid by the government system were analyzed., Results: A total of 10,951 procedures were analyzed (either for claudicants or critical ischemia-proportion unknown); 55.4% of the procedures were performed on males, and in 50.60%, the patient was older than 65 years. Approximately two-thirds of the patients undergoing these procedures had residential addresses in São Paulo. There were 363 in-hospital deaths (mortality of 3.31%). The hospital with the highest number of surgeries (n = 2,777) had lower in-hospital mortality (1.51%) than the other hospitals. A total of $20,655,272.70 was paid for all revascularizations., Conclusions: Revascularization for PAD treatment has cost the government system more than $20 million over 11 years. Endovascular surgeries were performed more often than open surgeries and resulted in shorter hospital stays and lower perioperative mortality rates., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly improved the life expectancy of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but has led to the rise of chronic conditions including peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, trends and outcomes among patients with HIV undergoing lower extremity revascularization are poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate the trends and perioperative outcomes of lower extremity revascularization among patients with HIV and PAD in a national database. The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was reviewed between 2003 and 2014. All hospital admissions with a diagnosis of PAD undergoing lower extremity revascularization were stratified based on HIV status. Outcomes were assessed using propensity score matching and multivariable regression. Among all patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization for PAD, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with HIV from 0.21% in 2003 to 0.52% in 2014 ( p < 0.01). Patients with HIV were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities, including coronary artery disease and diabetes, at the time of intervention compared to patients without HIV. With propensity score matching and multivariable regression, HIV status was associated with increased total hospital costs, but not length of stay, major amputation, or mortality. Patients with HIV with PAD who undergo revascularization are younger with fewer comorbidities, but have increased hospital costs compared to those without HIV. Lower extremity revascularization for PAD is safe for patients with HIV without increased risk of in-hospital major amputation or mortality, and continues to increase each year.

Objective: Lower extremity bypass surgery remains an important treatment option for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), but is resource intensive. We sought to evaluate the cost and Medicare reimbursement for lower extremity bypass surgery in patients with CLI., Methods: Hospital cost accounting systems were queried for total technical and professional costs incurred and reimbursement received for patients with CLI undergoing lower extremity bypass at our center between 2011 and 2017. Patients were identified by assignment to Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) 252, 253, or 254 (other vascular procedure with major complication/comorbidity, with complication/comorbidity, and without complication/comorbidity, respectively). Additional clinical data were incorporated from the Vascular Quality Initiative clinical registry. For non-Medicare patients, reimbursement was indexed to Medicare rates. Contribution margins (reimbursement minus cost) from technical and professional services were analyzed for each patient and summarized by DRG. We compared technical, professional, and total costs; reimbursement; and contribution margins across DRGs using univariate statistics and evaluated factors associated with total contribution margin using median quantile regression., Results: We analyzed 68 patients with hemodynamically confirmed CLI (46% rest pain, 54% tissue loss), of whom 25% received a prosthetic graft. Mean age was 66.1 ± 11.6 years, 69% were male, 49% diabetic, 44% current smokers, and 4% on dialysis. In general, total infrainguinal bypass cost was adequately compensated for patients assigned only the most complex DRG 252 (median, $2490; interquartile range [IQR], -$1,621 to $10,080). In the majority of patients with less complex DRG 253 (median, -$3,100; IQR, -$8499 to $109) and DRG 254 (median, -$4902; IQR, -$9259 to $1059), reimbursement did not cover the cost of care. Both technical costs and professional costs varied significantly with the complexity of DRG. Although reimbursement from technical services increased alongside increasing complexity of DRG, there was insignificant variation in professional reimbursement as DRG complexity increased. On multivariable modeling, longer length of stay (-$2547 per additional day) and preoperative dialysis (-$5555) were significantly associated with negative margins., Conclusions: For the majority of patients with CLI, current Medicare reimbursement does not adequately cover the cost of providing care after open bypass surgery. As commercial insurers move toward Medicare reimbursement rates, more granular risk stratification profiles are needed to ensure open surgical care for patients with CLI remains financially sustainable., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Estimate the direct costs of high-risk patients presenting with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) in France. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study used a representative claims database, the "Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires" (EGB), to identify patients presenting with CAD or PAD between 2011 and 2016. Among those, patients meeting the COMPASS trial selection criteria were selected, as well as controls matched on age and sex. Direct costs (Euros 2016) were estimated in a societal perspective by comparing case and controls. Results: The adult population presenting with CAD or PAD in the EGB in 2016 was estimated at 29,888 individuals, representing a crude prevalence rate of 5.44%. After using the documented selection criteria of the COMPASS study, this population (COMPASS-like) was estimated at 17,369 individuals (58.1% of the CAD and/or PAD total population). Among them, a proportion of 11.5% presented with CAD + PAD. Compared with the original COMPASS population, patients were older (76.5 vs 68.2 years) and with a lower male predominance (60.0% vs 78.2% males). Compared with controls, the COMPASS-like population was characterized by a higher annual mortality (5.9% vs 3.5%) and the presence of more comorbidities on top of CAD and/or PAD. The annual per capita extra direct cost of the COMPASS-like population was estimated at €4,284, with a main contribution from inpatient care (58.9%). This extra cost was higher in the PAD ± CAD sub-group (€5,552) and the CAD + PAD sub-group (€8,067). Limitations: The EGB had limitations about several clinical features defining high-risk patients that may lead to bias in our estimates. Conclusions: Due to the high prevalence of CAD and/or PAD and the associated high unit costs, this population generates a significant economic burden, which is higher among patients with PAD and in those presenting simultaneously with both conditions.

Purpose: Drug-eluting stents (DES) improve clinical and morphological long-term results compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with bailout bare metal stenting (BMS) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and infrapopliteal lesions (PADI trial). We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of DES compared to PTA ± BMS in cooperation with Dutch health insurance company VGZ, using data from the PADI trial., Materials and Methods: In the PADI trial, adults with CLI (Rutherford category ≥ 4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive DES with paclitaxel or PTA ± BMS. Seventy-four limbs (73 patients) were treated with DES and 66 limbs (64 patients) with PTA ± BMS. The costs were calculated by using the mean costs per stent multiplied by the mean number of stents used per patient (€750 × 1.8 for DES vs €250 × 0.3 for PTA ± BMS). These costs were compared with the costs of major amputation (€16.000) and rehabilitation (first year €15.750, second year €7.375 and third year €3.600)., Results: The 5-year major amputation rate was lower in the DES group (19.3% vs 34.0% for PTA ± BMS; p = 0.091). In addition, the 5-year amputation-free survival and event-free survival were significantly higher in the DES group (31.8% vs 20.4%, p=0.043; and 26.2% vs 15.3%, p=0.041, respectively). After 1 year, the cost difference per patient between DES and PTA ± BMS is €1.679 in favor of DES and €2.694 after 3 years., Conclusion: In our analysis, DES are cost-effective due to the higher hospital costs of amputation and rehabilitation in the PTA ± BMS group., Level of Evidence: Level 1b, analysis based on clinically sensible costs and randomized controlled trial.

Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains unclear, and contemporary comparative effectiveness data on endovascular versus surgical revascularization are lacking., Methods: We used the 2010 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample databases to identify hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ALI. Patients were propensity-score matched on the likelihood of undergoing endovascular versus surgical revascularization using a logistic regression model. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, stroke, composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke, any amputation, fasciotomy, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, transfusion, vascular complications, length of stay, and hospital costs., Results: Of 10 484 (weighted national estimate=51 914) hospitalizations for ALI, endovascular revascularization was performed in 5008 (47.8%) and surgical revascularization in 5476 (52.2%). In the propensity-score matched cohort (n=7746; 3873 per group), patients who underwent endovascular revascularization had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.8% versus 4.0%; P =0.002), myocardial infarction (1.9% versus 2.7%; P =0.022), composite of death/myocardial infarction/stroke (5.2% versus 7.5%; P <0.001), acute kidney injury (10.5% versus 11.9%; P =0.043), fasciotomy (1.9% versus 8.9%; P <0.001), major bleeding (16.7% versus 21.0%; P <0.001), and transfusion (10.3% versus 18.5%; P <0.001), but higher vascular complications (1.4% versus 0.7%; P =0.002), compared with those undergoing surgical revascularization. Rates of any amputation were similar between the 2 groups (4.7% versus 5.1%; P =0.43). Median length of stay was shorter and hospital costs higher with endovascular versus surgical revascularization., Conclusions: In patients with ALI, endovascular revascularization was associated with better in-hospital clinical outcomes compared with surgical revascularization. Contemporary randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for ALI.

Objective: Recent studies suggest similar perioperative outcomes for endovascular and open surgical management of acute limb ischemia (ALI). We sought to describe temporal trends, patient factors, and hospital costs associated with contemporary ALI management., Methods: We used the weighted National Inpatient Sample to estimate primary ALI cases requiring open or endovascular intervention (2005-2014). We used multivariable regression models to examine temporal trends, patient factors, and hospital costs associated with endovascular-first vs open-first management., Results: Of 116,451 admissions for ALI during the study period, 35.2% were treated by an endovascular-first approach. The percentage of admissions managed with an endovascular-first approach increased over time (P < .001). Independent predictors of endovascular-first management included younger age, male sex, renal insufficiency, and more recent calendar year of admission (P ≤ .02), whereas patients who underwent fasciotomy, those with Medicaid, and those admitted on a weekend were more likely to undergo open-first management (P ≤ .02). Endovascular-first management had higher mean hospital costs than open-first management ($29,719 vs $26,193; P < .001). After adjustment for patient, hospital, and admission characteristics, there was an increase of $981 in treatment costs per year in the endovascular-first group (95% confidence interval [CI], $571-$1392; P < .001), whereas the costs associated with an open-first approach remained relatively stable over time ($10 per year; 95% CI, -$295 to $315; P = .95; P < .001 for interaction). The risk-adjusted odds of in-hospital major amputation was similar in both groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .88)., Conclusions: Use of an endovascular-first approach for the treatment of ALI has significantly increased over time. Although major amputation rates are similar for both approaches, the costs associated with an endovascular-first approach are increasing over time, whereas the costs of open surgery have remained stable. The cost-effectiveness of modern ALI management warrants further investigation., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Stroke is a significant burden in Saudi Arabia and the Saudi Ministry of Health's stroke committee has identified an urgent need to improve care., Aim: The purpose of this study was to undertake a health-economic analysis to quantify the impact of developing stroke care in the country., Methods: An economic model was developed to assess the costs and clinical outcomes associated with an ischemic stroke care development program compared with current stroke care. Based on Saudi epidemiological data, cohorts of ischemic stroke patients enter the model each year for the first 10 years based on increasing incidence. Four treatment options were modeled including reperfusion and non-reperfusion treatments. The development scenario estimates the impact of gradually increasing uptake of more effective treatments over 10 years. Changes in the stroke care organization are considered along with resources required to increase capacity, allowing more patients to be admitted to stroke hospitals and access effective treatments., Results: The stroke care development program is associated with an increase in functionally independent patients and a decrease in disabling strokes compared with current stroke care. Additionally, the development program is associated with estimated cost savings of $602 million over 15 years ($255 million direct costs, $348 million indirect costs)., Conclusions: The model predicts that the stroke care development program is associated with improved patient outcomes and lower overall costs compared with the current stroke care program.

Objective: The treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI), with the intention to prevent limb loss, is often an intensive and expensive therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of endovascular and conservative treatment of elderly CLI patients unsuitable for surgery., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, data were gathered in two Dutch peripheral hospitals. CLI patients aged 70 years or older were included in the outpatient clinic. Exclusion criteria were malignant disease, lack of language skills, and cognitive impairment; 195 patients were included and 192 patients were excluded. After a multidisciplinary vascular conference, patients were divided into three treatment groups (endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or conservative therapy). Subanalyses based on age were made (70-79 years and ≥80 years). The follow-up period was 2 years. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular and conservative treatment was quantified using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in euros per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)., Results: At baseline, patients allocated to surgical revascularization had better health states, but the health states of endovascular revascularization and conservative therapy patients were comparable. With an ICER of €38,247.41/QALY (∼$50,869/QALY), endovascular revascularization was cost-effective compared with conservative therapy. This is favorable compared with the Dutch applicable threshold of €80,000/QALY (∼$106,400/QALY). The subanalyses also established that endovascular revascularization is a cost-effective alternative for conservative treatment both in patients aged 70 to 79 years (ICER €29,898.36/QALY; ∼$39,765/QALY) and in octogenarians (ICER €56,810.14/QALY; ∼$75,557/QALY)., Conclusions: Our study has shown that endovascular revascularization is cost-effective compared with conservative treatment of CLI patients older than 70 years and also in octogenarians. Given the small absolute differences in costs and effects, physicians should also consider individual circumstances that can alter the outcome of the intervention. Cost-effectiveness remains one of the aspects to take into consideration in making a clinical decision., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Peripheral arterial disease is a chronic vascular disease characterized by impaired circulation to the lower extremities. Its most severe stage, known as critical limb ischemia (CLI), puts patients at an increased risk of cardiovascular events, amputation, and death. The objective of this literature review is to describe the burden of disease across a comprehensive set of domains-epidemiologic, clinical, humanistic, and economic-focusing on key studies published in the last decade. CLI prevalence in the United States is estimated to be approximately 2 million and is likely to rise in the coming years given trends in important risk factors such as age, diabetes, and smoking. Hospitalization for CLI patients is common and up to 60% are readmitted within 6 months. Amputation rates are unacceptably high with a disproportionate risk for certain demographic and socioeconomic groups. In addition to limb loss, CLI patients also have reduced life expectancy with mortality typically exceeding 50% by 5 years. Given the poor clinical prognosis, it is unsurprising that the quality of life burden associated with CLI is significant. Studies assessing quality of life in CLI patients have used a variety of generic and disease-specific measures and all document a substantial impact of the disease on the patient's physical, social, and emotional health status compared to population norms. Finally, the poor clinical outcomes and increased medical resource use lead to a considerable economic burden for national health care systems. However, published cost studies are not comprehensive and, therefore, likely underestimate the true economic impact of CLI. Our summary documents a sobering assessment of CLI burden-a poor clinical prognosis translating into diminished quality of life and high costs for millions of patients. Continued prevention efforts and improved treatment strategies are the key to ameliorating the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with this disease., Competing Interests: Steve Duff is an employee of Veritas Health Economics Consulting which was contracted to conduct the literature review. Michael S Mafilios is an employee of Health Economics Associates which was contracted to conduct the literature review. Prajakta Bhounsule and James T Hasegawa are employees of Abbott Vascular. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: Atrial fibrillation is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke and increases cost of treatment., Aims: To estimate the incremental inpatient cost and length of stay due to atrial fibrillation among adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics in a nationally representative discharge record of US population., Methods: Hospital discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke were identified from the National Inpatient Sample data for the years 2010-2013. Generalized linear model with log link and least-square means were utilized to estimate the incremental inpatient cost and length of stay in ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation after controlling for sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics., Results: Among 434,544 hospital discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke, 90,190 (20.76%) discharge records had a secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. The average inpatient cost for all discharge records with a primary diagnosis of ischemic stroke was (mean = $13,072, median = $9270.87) significantly (p < 0.0001) higher compared to all discharge records without ischemic stroke (mean = $12,543.07, median = $7517.13). The mean length of stay for all records was 4.55 days (95% CI = 4.53-4.56). Among those identified with ischemic stroke, adjusted mean inpatient cost was higher by $2829 (95% CI = $2708-$2949) and mean length of stay was greater by 0.85 (95% CI = 0.81-0.89) for those with atrial fibrillation compared to those without., Conclusions: The presence of atrial fibrillation was associated with increased inpatient cost and length of stay among patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke. Increased inpatient cost and length of stay call for a more comprehensive patient care approach including targeted interventions among adults diagnosed with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation, which could potentially reduce the overall cost in this population.

Background: Despite significant technical advancement in the last decade, the durability of endovascular management of critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains highly debatable. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) are being popularized for the management of CLI after its precedent success in coronary intervention. Initial reports on the durability of DES are promising. However, little is known on the additional cost of this relatively newer technology. The aim of this study is to compare the cost of the traditional bare metal stents (BMSs) to the newly introduced DES in a large cohort of CLI patients., Methods: Using the Premier database (2009-2015), we identified all patients with CLI undergoing DES and BMS. A multivariable generalized linear model was implemented to examine in-hospital cost adjusting for patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and regional characteristics., Results: A total of 20,702 patients with CLI underwent peripheral artery revascularization using BMS (18,924 [91.41%]) or DES (1,778 [8.6%]). Majority of patients were males (53%) and whites (71%). Patients undergoing BMS were slightly younger (median age [interquartile range]: 70 [62-79] versus 71 [63-80]) and were more likely to be smokers (46% vs. 39%) and have a history of cerebrovascular disease (10% vs. 8%) and chronic pulmonary disease (24.5% vs. 20.9%) as compared with those undergoing DES (all P < 0.05). On the other hand, DES patients had a high prevalence of diabetes (4% vs. 3%) and renal disease (25% vs. 22%) (both P < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the proportion of patients undergoing DES and a corresponding decrease in BMS (P < 0.001) over the study period. Median total in-hospitalization cost (BMS: $13,342 [8,574 to 21,166], DES: $13,243 [8,560-20,232], P = 0.76) was similar for both approaches. After adjusting for potential confounders, DES was associated with $407 higher cost than BMS (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 407 [17 to 798], P = 0.04). In addition, the cost was $672 higher in teaching hospitals, $1,153 higher in Rural areas, and increased in all regions compared with the Midwest (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval]-South: $293 [31 to 555], Northeast: $2,006 [1,517 to 2,495], West: $3,312 [2,930 to 3,695], all P < 0.05)., Conclusions: In this large cohort of CLI patients, after controlling for potential confounders, we demonstrated that the cost of endovascular revascularization is significantly higher in patients undergoing DES than those undergoing BMS. Regional disparities in cost were also observed. Further studies looking at the long-term durability and costs of DES versus BMS are needed., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hospital readmissions are associated not only with increased mortality, morbidity, and costs but also, with current health-care reform, tied to significant financial and administrative penalties. Some studies show that patients undergoing vascular surgery may have higher than average readmission rates. The recently released Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) is the most comprehensive national source of readmission data, gathering discharge information from 22 geographically dispersed states, accounting for 51.2% of the total U.S. resident population and 49.3% of all U.S. hospitalizations. The aim of this study is to use the power of the NRD and obtain nationally representative readmission information for patients admitted with claudication or critical limb ischemia (CLI) who underwent revascularization procedures., Methods: The NRD was queried for all patients admitted for claudication (International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision [ICD-9] 440.21) or CLI (ICD-9 440.22-440.24) and who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, peripheral bypass, or aortofemoral bypass. Patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), mortality, readmission rates, and associated costs were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was implemented on claudication and CLI groups on all outcomes of interest. The most common readmission diagnosis codes and diagnosis groups were also identified., Results: A total of 92,769 patients were admitted for peripheral vascular disease (33,055 with claudication and 59,714 with CLI). The 30-day readmission/any readmission rate was 8.97%/21.49% and 19.26%/40.36%, for claudication and CLI, respectively. Significant differences were found for claudication and CLI, respectively, on initial cost of admission ($18,548 vs. $29,148, P < 0.001), readmission costs ($14,726 vs. $17,681 P < 0.001), LOS (4 days vs. 9 days, P < 0.001), days to readmission (73 days vs. 59 days, P < 0.001), mortality during initial admission (256 vs. 1,363, P < 0.001), and mortality during any admission (538 vs. 3,838, P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that claudication, CLI, angioplasty, peripheral bypass, aortofemoral bypass, female sex, age >65, Charlson Comorbidity Index, LOS, and primary expected payer status were all significant predictors of 30-day and overall readmissions at varying degrees. The 5 most common disease readmission groups found were other vascular procedures (12.6%), amputation of lower limb except toes (6.3%), sepsis (5.4%), heart failure (4.9%) and postoperative or other device infections (4.8%). Of the abovementioned groups, the 4 most common diagnoses included "other postoperative infections," sepsis, atherosclerosis of native arteries with gangrene, and "other complications due to other vascular device, implant, or graft.", Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that there is a significant difference in readmission rates, cost, and morbidity between patients admitted for claudication and CLI. Furthermore, based on regression analysis, there are multiple other clear risk factors associated with worse clinical and economic outcomes. Further study is needed to predict which patients will require increased vigilance during their hospital stay to prevent readmissions and worse outcomes., Level of Evidence: Care management/epidemiological, level IV., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background The optimal treatment for critical limb ischemia remains controversial owing to conflicting conclusions from previous studies. Methods and Results We obtained administrative claims on Medicare beneficiaries with initial critical limb ischemia diagnosis in 2011. Clinical outcomes and healthcare costs over 4 years were estimated among all patients and by first treatment (endovascular revascularization, surgical revascularization, or major amputation) in unmatched and propensity-score-matched samples. Among 72 199 patients with initial primary critical limb ischemia diagnosis in 2011, survival was 46% (median survival, 3.5 years) and freedom from major amputation was 87%. Among 9942 propensity-score-matched patients (8% rest pain, 26% ulcer, and 66% gangrene), survival was 38% with endovascular revascularization (median survival, 2.7 years), 40% with surgical revascularization (median survival, 2.9 years), and 23% with major amputation (median survival, 1.3 years; P<0.001 for each revascularization procedure versus major amputation). Corresponding major amputation rates were 6.5%, 9.6%, and 10.6%, respectively ( P<0.001 for all pair-wise comparisons). The cost per patient year during follow-up was $49 700, $49 200, and $55 700, respectively ( P<0.001 for each revascularization procedure versus major amputation). Conclusions Long-term survival and cost in critical limb ischemia management is comparable between revascularization techniques, with lower major amputation rates following endovascular revascularization. Primary major amputation results in shorter survival, higher risk of subsequent major amputation, and higher healthcare costs versus revascularization. Results from this observational research may be susceptible to bias because of the influence of unmeasured confounders.

Objective/background: There are few published data on the acute care or long-term costs after acute/critical limb or visceral ischaemia (ACLVI) events. Using data from patients with acute events in a population based incidence study (Oxford Vascular Study), the present study aimed to determine the long-term costs after an ACLVI event., Methods: All patients with first ever incident ACLVI from 2002 to 2012 were included. Analysis was based on follow up until January 2017, with all patients having full 5 year follow up. Multivariate regressions were used to assess baseline and subsequent predictors of total 5 year hospital care costs. Overall costs after an ACLVI event were benchmarked against those after stroke in the same population, during the same period., Results: Among 351 patients with an ACLVI event, mean 5 year total care costs were €35,211 (SD 50,500), of which €6443 (18%) were due to long-term institutionalisation. Costs differed by type of event (acute visceral ischaemia €16,476; acute limb ischaemia €24,437; critical limb ischaemia €46,281; p < 0.001). Results of the multivariate analyses showed that patients with diabetes and those undergoing above knee amputations incurred additional costs of €11,804 (p = 0.014) and €25,692 (p < 0.001), respectively. Five year hospital care costs after an ACLVI event were significantly higher than after stroke (€28,768 vs. €22,623; p = 0.004), but similar after including long-term costs of institutionalisation (€35,211 vs. €35,391; p = 0.957)., Conclusion: Long-term care costs after an ACLVI event are considerable, especially after critical limb ischaemia. Hospital care costs were significantly higher than for stroke over the long term, and were similar after inclusion of costs of institutionalisation., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) in a pediatric patient is a rare condition but may result in lifelong disability. A paucity of evidence exists to derive treatment guidelines; some surgeons advocate conservative management over invasive measures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of surgical revascularization in the pediatric population and outcomes of conservative vs surgical management., Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database (California, Iowa, and New York) between 2007 and 2013 was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: conservative management and surgical management. Each group was further subdivided into three age groups: infant (<24 months), child (<12 years), and adolescent (<18 years). Outcome variables included mortality, amputation status, length of hospital stay, and hospital charge., Results: A total of 1576 pediatric patients with ALI were identified among 6,122,535 pediatric admissions (26 per 100,000 admissions). Average age was 9.9 ± 7.1 years. There were 263 patients who underwent surgical revascularization. The conservative management group was younger (5.8 ± 6.2 vs 9.2 ± 6.1 years; P < .01). Otherwise, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, the amputation rate was low (<2%; n = 28), especially in the upper extremities (<0.2%). Outcomes of conservative management and surgical revascularization were similar for mortality (5.0% vs 3.4%; P = .34), amputation (1.9% vs 1.1%; P = .46), length of hospital stay (15.4 vs 12.9 days; P = .07), and hospital charge ($281,794 vs $288,507; P = .28). In subgroup analysis, infants had less concomitant orthopedic injury than other age groups. Children demonstrated a higher likelihood of associated upper extremity injury and operative revascularization (P < .01) than infants or adolescents. In infants, mortality was higher and surgical intervention was associated with longer hospital stay (29.5 ± 34.4 days vs 45.6 ± 31.6 days; P = .02) and larger health care expenditure ($467,885 ± $638,653 vs $1,099,343 ± $695,872; P < .01)., Conclusions: Pediatric ALI is a rare entity and is associated with low amputation and mortality rates. Among the pediatric age cohorts, infants with ALI are at higher risk of in-hospital mortality than older age groups are. Surgical intervention is not associated with improved limb salvage or mortality. Nonoperative management may be considered an initial treatment modality, but further research is needed to elucidate which important subset of pediatric patients benefit from open or endovascular operative intervention., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess midterm functional status, wound healing, and in-hospital resource use among a prospective cohort of patients treated in a tertiary hospital, multidisciplinary Center for Limb Preservation., Methods: Data were prospectively gathered on all consecutive admissions to the Center for Limb Preservation from July 2013 to October 2014 with follow-up data collection through January 2016. Limbs were staged using the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) threatened limb classification scheme at the time of hospital admission. Patients with nonatherosclerotic vascular disorders, acute limb ischemia, and trauma were excluded., Results: The cohort included 128 patients with 157 threatened limbs; 8 limbs with unstageable disease were excluded. Mean age (±standard deviation [SD]) was 66 (±13) years, and median follow-up duration (interquartile range) was 395 (80-635) days. Fifty percent (n = 64/128) of patients were readmitted at least once, with a readmission rate of 20% within 30 days of the index admission. Mean total number of admissions per patient (±SD) was 1.9 ± 1.2, with mean (±SD) cumulative length of stay (cLOS) of 17.1 (±17.9) days. During follow-up, 25% of limbs required a vascular reintervention, and 45% developed recurrent wounds. There was no difference in the rate of readmission, vascular reintervention, or wound recurrence by initial WIfI stage (P > .05). At the end of the study period, 23 (26%) were alive and nonambulatory; in 20%, functional status was missing. On both univariate and multivariate analysis, end-stage renal disease and prior functional status predicted ability to ambulate independently (P < .05). WIfI stage was associated with major amputation (P = .01) and cLOS (P = .002) but not with time to wound healing. Direct hospital (inpatient) cost per limb saved was significantly higher in stage 4 patients (P < .05 for all time periods). WIfI stage was associated with cumulative in-hospital costs at 1 year and for the overall follow-up period., Conclusions: Among a population of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital limb preservation service, WIfI stage was predictive of midterm freedom from amputation, cLOS, and hospital costs but not of ambulatory functional status, time to wound healing, or wound recurrence. Patients presenting with limb-threatening conditions require significant inpatient care, have a high frequency of repeated hospitalizations, and are at significant risk for recurrent wounds and leg symptoms at later times. Stage 4 patients require the most intensive care and have the highest initial and aggregate hospital costs per limb saved. However, limb salvage can be achieved in these patients with a dedicated multidisciplinary team approach., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Aims: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have an increased risk of major amputation. The initial treatment approach for CLI may significantly impact the subsequent risk of major amputation or death. The objective of this study was to describe the initial treatment approaches of patients with CLI and the limb outcomes associated with each approach., Methods: Data from MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases from January 2006-December 2014 was utilized. Cohorts of CLI patients were defined as follows: (1) peripheral vascular intervention (PVI); (2) peripheral vascular surgery (PVS); (3) minor amputation without concomitant PVI or PVS (MinAMP); and (4) Patients without PVI, PVS, or MinAMP (conservative therapy). The odds of major amputation or inpatient death were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. For those patients requiring a major amputation, the incremental expenditures per member per month (PMPM) were estimated using a gamma log-link model., Results: Conservative therapy was associated with significantly higher odds of major amputation or inpatient death compared to patients who underwent minor amputation (1.59-times), PVI (2.08-times), or PVS (2.12-times). Patients treated with an initial strategy of minor amputation also had higher odds of major amputation or inpatient death compared to PVS (1.31-times) or PVI (1.33-times). The estimated incremental expenditures PMPM for patients with a major amputation was $5,165., Conclusions: Revascularization reduces the risk of a major amputation or inpatient death for patients with CLI when compared to conservative therapy. Major amputation is also associated with significantly higher healthcare expenditures.

Background: Severe limb ischaemia (SLI) is defined as the presence of rest pain and/or tissue loss secondary to lower extremity atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease. The superficial femoral and popliteal arteries are the most commonly diseased vessels in such patients and are being increasingly treated using endovascular revascularisation techniques. However, it is currently unknown whether drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons confer additional clinical benefits over more established techniques using plain balloons and bare metal stents, or whether they represent a cost-effective use of NHS resources., Methods: The BASIL-3 trial is a UK National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment Programme-funded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of plain balloon angioplasty with or without bail-out bare metal stenting, drug-coated balloon angioplasty with or without bail-out bare metal stenting, and primary stenting with drug-eluting stents for SLI secondary to femoro-popliteal disease. Patients with 'multilevel' disease may receive aorto-iliac and/or infrapopliteal treatments concurrently with their randomised femoro-popliteal intervention. The primary clinical outcome is amputation-free survival defined as the time to major (above the ankle) amputation of the index limb or death from any cause. The primary outcome for the economic analysis is cost per quality-adjusted life year. Secondary outcome measures include overall survival, major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, relief of ischaemic pain, healing of tissue loss, and quality of life. The required sample size has been calculated at 861 participants (287 on each arm). These patients will be recruited over 3 years and followed-up for between 2 and 5 years., Discussion: BASIL-3 is a pragmatic RCT designed to reflect current UK clinical practice. The results will inform decision-making regarding the appropriateness of funding the use of drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents, by the NHS, for the management of SLI due to femoro-popliteal disease., Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry, identifier: ISRCTN14469736 . Registered on 22 October 2015.

Background: Readmissions constitute a major health care burden among critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence of readmission and factors affecting readmission in CLI patients., Methods: All adult hospitalizations with a diagnosis code for CLI were included from State Inpatient Databases from Florida (2009 to 2013), New York (2010 to 2013), and California (2009 to 2011). Data were merged with the directory available from the American Hospital Association to obtain detailed information on hospital-related characteristics. Geographic and routing analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of travel time to the hospital on readmission rate., Results: Overall, 695,782 admissions from 212,241 patients were analyzed. Of these, 284,189 were admissions with a principal diagnosis of CLI (primary CLI admissions). All-cause readmission rates at 30 days and 6 months were 27.1% and 56.6%, respectively. The majority of these were unplanned readmissions. Unplanned readmission rates at 30 days and 6 months were 23.6% and 47.7%, respectively. The major predictors of 6-month unplanned readmissions included age, female sex, black/Hispanic race, prior amputation, Charlson comorbidity index, and need for home health care or rehabilitation facility upon discharge. Patients covered by private insurance were least likely to have a readmission compared with Medicaid/no insurance and Medicare populations. Travel time to the hospital was inversely associated with 6-month unplanned readmission rates. There was a significant interaction between travel time and major amputation as well as travel time and revascularization strategy; however, the inverse association between travel time and unplanned readmission rate was evident in all subgroups. Furthermore, length of stay during index hospitalization was directly associated with the likelihood of 6-month unplanned readmission (odds ratio for log-transformed length of stay: 2.39 [99% confidence interval: 2.31 to 2.47])., Conclusions: Readmission among patients with CLI is high, the majority of them being unplanned readmissions. Several demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors play important roles in predicting readmissions., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nonembolic acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a condition characterized by a sudden decrease in limb perfusion and requires immediate interventions. There are multiple treatment options available including surgery, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), endovascular procedures, and hybrid treatment (a combination of open and endovascular techniques). Randomized trials provide information only on clinical efficacy, but not on economic outcomes. The objective of the study was to perform the cost-effective analysis comparing different treatment alternatives of ALI., Methods: The data were collected from 4r ProMedica community hospitals in the Northwest Ohio from January 2009 to December 2012. Patients were included if they were treated within 14 days of onset of symptoms for nonembolic ALI and were divided into groups of receiving CDT, surgery, endovascular, or hybrid treatments. Demographics, comorbidities, medications taken before admission, and smoking status were collected at baseline for all patients and were compared among the treatment groups. A cost-effectiveness decision tree was developed to calculate expected costs and life years gained associated with available treatment options. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed to check the robustness of the model., Results: A population of 205 patients with the diagnosis of ALI was included and divided into different treatment groups. There was no major significant difference in baseline characteristics among the studied groups (P > 0.05). The total costs were $17,163.47 for surgery, $20,620.39 for endovascular, $21,277.61 for hybrid, and $30,675.42 for CDT. The life years gained were 17.25 for surgery, 18 for endovascular, 18 for hybrid, and 17 for CDT. CDT was dominated because of the high cost and the low effectiveness, while hybrid treatment was dominated when compared with endovascular treatment because these 2 treatments have similar outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the endovascular group over the surgery group was found to be $4,609.23 per life year gained. The sensitivity analysis showed that the endovascular treatment was found to be cost-effective under willingness to pay $50,000., Conclusions: This study provides economic evaluation of ALI treatments for a defined clinical population in the real-world setting. Compared with other available alternatives, the endovascular treatment showed to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) represent a technically demanding subset of lesions, which in most cases require special endovascular methods, advanced operator skills, and utilization of sophisticated assisting devices for successful treatment. CTO crossing devices offer an additional option to interventionists in the treatment of challenging lower extremity peripheral arterial occlusions. These devices may improve crossing rates, allowing delivery of therapeutic devices to the target lesion. Initial technical results seem quite promising, although adequate data on patient and device selection are lacking. Until long-term clinical data verify the durability of those techniques, these devices must be used in a stepwise fashion in selected patients with CLI.

Background, Objectives, Design: Aging of the population is one of the major challenges facing public health systems. The impact of aging on acute and long-term outcome of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) is currently not sufficiently clarified. This analysis consists of comprehensive, anonymized data obtained from the largest public health insurance in Germany., Results: A total of 41,740 PAD patients with an index hospitalization between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011, and a follow-up time up to 4 years were included (40-49 years: n = 1179; 50-59 years: n = 5415; 60-69 years: n = 10,565; 70-79 years: n = 13,313; 80-89 years: n = 9714; and 90-100 years: n = 1554). Advanced age was associated with female gender (men-women ratio up to 1:3.3), less smoking, less frequent obesity, more often chronic heart failure (up to 9-fold), chronic kidney disease (up to 4-fold), fewer angiographies (up to 0.8-fold), fewer endovascular (up to 0.5-fold) and surgical revascularizations (up to 0.9-fold), higher rates of amputation (up to 2.5-fold), acute renal failure (up to 3.7-fold), in-hospital mortality (up to 12-fold), myocardial infarction (up to 2.8-fold), ischemic stroke (up to 1.5-fold), infection (up to 1.4-fold), and sepsis (up to 1.8-fold) (each P < .001). During follow-up, advanced age was a highly significant independent predictor of long-term mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke (each P < .001). Lengths of hospital stay (up to 1.3-fold longer) and reimbursement costs (up to 1.1-fold higher) were clearly associated with advanced age (each P < .001)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the impact of aging on morbidity, in-hospital treatment, complications, and acute and long-term outcome of PAD patients., (Copyright © 2016 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With a rise in the aging popluation, the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is markedly increasing. The overall disease prevalence of PAD is in the range of 3%-10%, which increases to 15%-20% in persons older than 70 years of age. Given this upward trend in disease prevalence, the economic and societal burden of PAD would be considerable. The subgroup of patients who develop critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the most challenging population to manage medically, surgically, and endovascularly. Patients with symptomatic PAD and CLI have an increased risk for death and cardiovascular events, especially in those with CLI who carry with them a substantial risk of limb loss. Advances in medical, surgical, and endovascular techniques have shown excellent outcomes in the treatment of these patients, however the optimal management paradigm has not been elucidated. This article reviews the classification and epidemiology, risk factors, natural history, and health care costs associated with PAD and CLI., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: This study aimed to identify factors that drive increasing health-care costs associated with the management of critical limb ischemia in elective inpatients., Methods: Patients with a primary diagnosis code of critical limb ischemia (CLI) were identified from the 2001-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Demographics, CLI management, comorbidities, complications (bleeding, surgical site infection [SSI]), length of stay, and median in-hospital costs were reviewed. Statistical analysis was completed using Students' t-test and Mann-Kendall trend analysis. Costs are reported in 2011 US dollars corrected using the consumer price index., Results: From 2001 to 2011, there were a total of 451,823 patients who underwent open elective revascularization as inpatients for CLI. Costs to treat CLI increased by 63% ($12,560 in 2001 to $20,517 in 2011, P < 0.001 in trend analysis). Endovascular interventions were 20% more expensive compared with open surgery ($19,566 vs. $16,337, P < 0.001). Age, gender, and insurance status did not affect the cost of care. From 2001 to 2011, the number of patient comorbidities (7.56-12.40) and percentage of endovascular cases (13.4% to 27.4%) increased, accounting for a 6% annual increase in total cost despite decreased median length of stay (6 to 5 days). Patients who developed SSI had total costs 83% greater than patients without SSIs ($30,949 vs. $16,939; P < 0.001). Patients who developed bleeding complications had total costs 41% greater than nonbleeding patients ($23,779 vs. $16,821, P < 0.001). Overall, there was a 32% reduction in SSI rates but unchanged rates of bleeding complications during this period., Conclusions: The cost of CLI treatment is increasing and driven by rising endovascular use, SSI, and bleeding in the in-patient population. Further efforts to reduce complications in this patient population may contribute to a reduction in health care-associated costs of treating CLI., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Despite the many studies showing an association between CKD and a high risk of ischemic events and mortality, the association of CKD with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) still has not been well described., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: This large cohort study assessed the association of CKD, even in the earlier stages, with morbidity, short- and long-term outcome, and costs among patients with PAD., Results: We identified 41,882 patients with PAD who had an index hospitalization between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Of these, 8470 (20.2%) also had CKD (CKD stage 2: n=2158 [26%]; stage 3: n=3941 [47%]; stage 4: n=935 [11%]; stage 5: n=1436 [17%]). The ratio of women to men was 1:1.2. Compared with patients without known CKD, those with CKD had higher frequencies of coronary artery disease (1.8-fold higher; P<0.001), chronic heart failure (3.3-fold higher; P<0.001), and Rutherford PAD categories 5 and 6 (1.8-fold higher; P<0.001); underwent significantly fewer revascularizations (0.9-fold fewer; P<0.001); had a nearly two-fold higher amputation rate (P<0.001); had higher frequencies of in-hospital infections (2.1-fold higher; P<0.001), acute renal failure (2.8-fold higher; P<0.001), and sepsis (1.9-fold higher; P<0.001); had a 2.5-fold higher frequency of myocardial infarction (P<0.001); and had a nearly three-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate (P<0.001). In an adjusted multivariable Cox regression model, CKD remained a significant predictor of long-term outcome of patients with PAD during follow-up for up to 4 years (until December 31, 2012; median, 775 days; 25th-75th percentiles, 469-1120 days); the hazard ratio was 2.59 (95% confidence interval, 2.21 to 2.78; P<0.001). The projected mortality rates after 4 years were 27% in patients without known CKD and 46%, 52%, 72%, and 78% in those with CKD stages 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Lengths of hospital stay and reimbursement costs were on average nearly 1.4-fold higher (P<0.001) in patients who also had CKD., Conclusions: This analysis illustrates the significant and important association of CKD with in-hospital and long-term mortality, morbidity, amputation rates, duration and costs of hospitalization, in-hospital treatment, and complications in patients with PAD., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: To analyze the costs of inhospital, percutaneous treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) carried out in Poland, a European Union country with a low-budget national health system., Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital for endovascular treatment of CLI over 1 year., Setting: A single, large volume, tertiary angiology center located in Southern Poland., Participants: CLI patients due to aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, or infrapopliteal arterial stenoses or occlusions with indications for first-line endovascular therapy or similar patients who refused open surgical procedure despite having primary indications for vascular surgery., Interventions: Direct stenting using bare-metal stents was the primary mode of treatment for lesions located within the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal arterial segments. Plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) was the second most commonly used technique. For below-the-knee arteries, POBA was the mainstay of treatment, which was occasionally supported by drug-eluting stent angioplasty. Directional atherectomy, scoring balloon angioplasty, or local fibrinolysis was used infrequently. Drug-eluting balloon percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was not used., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were the mean reimbursement of costs provided by the Polish National Health Fund (NHF) for inhospital treatment of patients for whom endovascular procedures were performed as initial treatment for CLI and the inhospital costs of endovascular treatment calculated by the caregiver in the 2 years since the first procedure. The average total number of days spent in hospital, amputation-free survival (AFS), overall survival (OS), and limb salvage rate (LSR) according to a life-table method were also calculated for the 2 years., Results: In the first year, there were 496 endovascular and 15 surgical hospitalizations for revascularization procedures to treat 340 limbs in 327 patients, with a further 53 revascularization procedures in the second year. There were an additional 90 hospitalizations over the first year and 38 over the second year for CLI-associated cardiovascular comorbidities. The mean reimbursement for hospitalizations of patients included into observation, provided by the NHF, was $4901.94 per patient for the first year and $833.57 per patient alive to the second year. The mean cost of hospitalization for percutaneous revascularization treatment was $3804.25 per patient for the first year and $3340.30 per patient requiring revascularization within the second year. All costs were calculated in constant 2011 USD. The average total number of days spent in hospital was 8.4 days for the first year and 1.97 days per patient alive to the second year. At 1 and 2 years, the AFS was 76.8% and 66.6%, the OS was 86.5% and 77.3%, and the LSR was 89.4% and 86%, respectively., Conclusions: Endovascular therapy using the currently available techniques can be performed in almost all patients suffering from CLI at relatively low costs, and satisfactory results can be obtained. Physicians play a pivotal role in ensuring quality of treatment and the reduction of treatment cost in these patients., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Multidisciplinary amputation prevention teams decrease the frequency of major amputations by increasing the use of revascularization procedures and minor amputations. The outcomes of wound healing, wound recurrence, and ambulatory status are assumed to be improved but are not routinely reported. This study investigates the midterm outcomes of neuroischemic wounds treated by our multidisciplinary team., Methods: A retrospective review of patients with neuroischemic wounds treated at a single institution amputation prevention clinic from March 2012 to July 2013. Patient demographics, wound characteristics, procedural details, and clinical and functional outcomes were reviewed. Clinical end points under study included time to wound healing, reulceration rate, and ambulatory status., Results: Over 16 months, there were 202 new patients and 1,355 clinic visits. Ninety-one limbs from 89 patients were treated for complex neuroischemic wounds. In 67% (61 of 91) of limbs, wounds were present for >6 weeks before referral. A history of previous revascularization was present in 39% (31 of 91), and 28% (22 of 91) had a previous minor amputation. Forty-one percent of wounds (38 of 91) were limited to the toes or the forefoot whereas 24% (22 of 91) involved the hindfoot or ankle. A total of 151 podiatric and 86 vascular interventions were performed, with an equal distribution of endovascular and open revascularizations. Complete healing was observed for 59% of wounds (54 of 91) over the observation period (median follow up, 207 days; range 56-561 days), and the average time to full healing was 12 weeks. Hindfoot wounds were predictive of failure to heal (odds ratio, 0.21; P < 0.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.68). Nineteen percent of patients (17 of 91) developed a new wound in the ipsilateral leg during follow-up. Three major amputations were performed (2 below-knee amputation and 1 above-knee amputation) for a major/minor amputation ratio of 0.06. Ambulatory status was preserved or improved in 74% (67 of 91) of patients. The 30-day readmission rate was 11%, which was lower than that observed (21%) in a contemporaneous but all-inclusive population of lower extremity revascularization procedures performed at our institution., Conclusions: Multidisciplinary limb salvage teams effectively heal wounds and maintain ambulatory status in patients with limb-threatening neuroischemic wounds. Patient specific factors, such as hindfoot or ankle wounds, can adversely influence the outcome. Even with aggressive care, healing can be prolonged and a substantial proportion of patients can be expected to have a recurrence, making subsequent surveillance mandatory. Our data also suggest that a coordinated amputation prevention program may help to minimize hospital readmissions in this high-risk population., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This overview comments on the health-care relevance of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). We evaluated different treatment modalities in terms of cost-effectiveness., Method: For the literature review, the Medline database (PubMed) was searched under the key words "critical limb ischemia AND cost", "critical limb ischemia AND economy", "peripheral arterial disease AND cost", "peripheral arterial disease AND economy"., Results: In the years 2005 to 2009, the hospitalisations of patients with PAOD rose disproportionately in Germany by 20 %, to 483,961 hospital admissions. By comparison, hospital admissions altogether increased by only 8 %. The average in-patient costs were estimated to be approximately € 5000 per PAOD-patient - a rather conservative estimate. For the patient with IC the economic data position is clear, supervised exercise training is by far the most cost-effective treatment option, followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and finally the peripheral bypass. In accordance with the guidelines of the UK, the latter is therefore indicated only if PTA fails or is technically not possible. In patients with CLI, the situation is not obvious. Indeed, a short-term economic advantage can be calculated for the PTA, the long-term comparison of both methods, however, is impossible due to insufficient data. In addition, the risk factors for the patient have to be included in the calculation. This was indeed demonstrated in the short-term, but could not be analysed in the long-term follow-up., Conclusion: The issue of greater cost-effectiveness of open or endovascular treatment in patients with CLI is uncertain, the studies and patient populations are too heterogeneous. Further studies are urgently needed to structure the sequence of the various treatment options in guidelines and clinical pathways., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objective: The optimal initial treatment for patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) remains undefined. Although clinical outcome data are inconsistent, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with tissue plasminogen activator is increasingly used. Patient-level analysis combining clinical and economic data in a real-life setting is lacking. This study compared clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of initial treatment strategies for nonembolic ALI using real-life patient-level data., Methods: Medical records and data for hospital costs were analyzed for nonembolic ALI patients treated in four hospitals over 3 years. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a decision tree analytic model. All costs were valued based on cost-to-charge ratios., Results: In 205 patients, initial treatments were CDT alone in 68 or with angioplasty in 16, open surgery in 60, endovascular in 33, and hybrid in 28. Although clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among the groups, reintervention rates during hospital stay, readmission rates, and costs were highest in the CDT group. Reintervention was required in 62% of patients after CDT compared with 7% after open surgery, and 16% of the CDT patients needed more than one reintervention. The mean total hospital cost was $34,800 per patient in CDT group compared with $10,677 in open surgery group., Conclusions: In this real-life study, initial treatment of nonembolic ALI with currently available CDT options was associated with greater health care resource consumption and cost compared with other initial treatment options., (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The value of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of diabetic ulcers is still under debate. Available evidence suggests that HBOT may improve the healing of diabetic ulcers, but it comes from small trials with heterogeneous populations and interventions. The DAMOCLES-trial will assess the (cost-)effectiveness of HBOT for ischemic diabetic ulcers in addition to standard of care., Methods: In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, including 30 hospitals and all 10 HBOT centers in the Netherlands, we plan to enroll 275 patients with Types 1 or 2 diabetes, a Wagner 2, 3 or 4 ulcer of the leg present for at least 4 weeks, and concomitant leg ischemia, defined as an ankle systolic blood pressure of <70 mmHg, a toe systolic blood pressure of <50 mmHg or a forefoot transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcpO2) of <40 mmHg. Eligible patients may be candidates for revascularization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard care with or without 40 HBOT-sessions., Results: Primary outcome measures are freedom from major amputation after 12 months and achievement of, and time to, complete wound healing. Secondary endpoints include freedom from minor amputations, ulcer recurrence, TcpO2 , quality of life, and safety. In addition, we will assess the cost-effectiveness of HBOT for this indication., Conclusion: The DAMOCLES trial will be the largest trial ever performed in the realm of HBOT for chronic ulcers, and it is unique for addressing patients with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers who may also receive vascular reconstructions. This matches the treatment dilemma in current clinical practice., (© 2014 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Aim: Patients with end-stage critical limb ischemia (CLI) survive on borrowed time and amputation is inevitable if an aggressive management stratagem is not instigated. Our primary aim was to equate effectiveness of subintimal angioplasty (SIA) and tibial balloon angioplasty (TBA) in sustaining clinical improvement and amputation free survival (AFS) in patients with CLI TASD II D. Moreover, patients with severe CLI, who were not suitable for revascularization and who were offered therapy with a sequential compression biomechanical device (SCBD) were scrutinised as part of a comprehensive lower limb salvage program., Methods: From 2002-2012, 5876 patients were referred with peripheral vascular disease (PVD); 987 presented with CLI and 798 had intervention; 189 patients presenting with CLI were not candidates for revascularisation, out of which 171 were offered SCBD. We formed a prospective observational group study of 441 patient who had TASC D disease. All of these patients presented as emergencies and were allocated to the next available treatment list. Duplex ultrasound arterial mapping (DUAM) was the sole preoperative investigation tool in 92% of all cases. Of the 441 patients studied, 190 patients (206 procedures) has SIA for TASC D femero-popliteal occlusions, 80 patients (89 procedures) had TBA and cool eximer laser angioplasty (CELA) for tibial artery occlusions and 171 patients with severe CLI were not suitable for revascularization and joined the SCBD program. Mean age (SIA 73±13 years vs. TBA/CELA 74±8 years vs. SCBD 75±13 years), and comorbidity severity scores (P>0.05) were similar between groups., Results: Perioperative mortality within the SIA group was 1.6% vs. 0% within the TBA group and 0.6% in SCBD. Length of hospital stay within the TBA group was 3.8±2 days vs. SIA 14±16 days, P<0.0001. The 5-year freedom from major adverse events (MAE) for the SIA group was 68% that was comparable to the results obtained for both the TBA group; 59%, and SCBD group: 62.5% (P=0.1935). Five-year freedom from target lesion revascularization was 85.9% within the SIA group and 79% within the TBA group. A sustained clinical improvement was seen in 82.8% of primary SIA and 68% of TBA, which mimics the outcome of SCBD at 68% at one year. A total of 83% SCBD patients had no rest pain within one week of starting the program and gangrene remained dry and non-progressive. Ulceration healed in all but 12 patients. There were no device-related complications. Limb salvage was 94% at 5 years. All-cause survival was 69%. Quality time spent without symptoms of disease or toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) was 24.7 months for SIA and 8.5 months for TBA and was 38.13 for SCBD for a total of 708 months of usage. Cost per quality adjusted-life years (QALY) for SIA was € 5662.79, € 12,935.18 for TBA and € 2943.56 for SCBD., Conclusion: All treatment pathways augmented patient-specific Q-TWiST with substantial cost reduction. SIA, TBA and SCBD expand AFS and symptom-free survival. All treatment modalities are minimally invasive and allow for a high patient turnover without compromising limb salvage, once they are performed by experienced vascular surgeons in high deliberate practice volume centers.

Vascular surgeons are well acquainted with chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI), the most severe manifestation of peripheral arterial disease, with patients presenting with ischemic rest pain or ulcerations, or both. Epidemiologic data predict a burgeoning epidemic of CLI within the United States, commensurate with the increasing incidence and prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors, especially age and diabetes. Untreated, the risk of major amputation (above the ankle) or death, or both, ranges between 20% and 40% at 1 year. Current open and endovascular therapies have imperfect results, diverse treatment options, and recommendations that are often conflicting and confuse physicians, industry, and patients alike. The best treatment options are ideally evaluated by prospective, randomized controlled trials. However, these have proven impractical in CLI because the rapid evolution of devices and techniques has outstripped the ability to measure outcomes and compare treatment options. Alternatively, risk-stratifying models have been proposed to allow physicians, patients, and industry to objectively evaluate new therapeutics and devices as they evolve. These models are developed from prospective cohorts to identify and quantify variables that can subsequently predict outcome in individual patients. The risk stratification models can also compare CLI outcomes between physicians and institutions, supporting quality assessments, and compensation decisions within Accountable Care Organizations under the Affordable Health Care Act (ACA). Widespread adoption of risk-stratification schemes has yet to occur, despite the critical need for such a tool in CLI, because present models lack optimal predictive ability and generalizability. The passage of the ACA amplifies the importance of developing an improved risk-stratification tool to ensure equitable quality assessments and compensation. This review presents current risk-stratification models for CLI with a summary of the respective strengths and limitations of each. Future research is needed to simplify and improve the accuracy and generalizability of risk stratification in CLI., (Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Open revascularization (OR) has been the treatment of choice for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) for many years, but endovascular revascularization (EV) has been increasingly used with good short-term results. In this study, we evaluated the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of EV and OR in patients with CMI refractory to conservative management., Methods: A Markov-state transition model was developed using TreeAge Pro 2012 (TreeAge Inc, Williamstown, Mass) to simulate a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 65-year-old female patients with CMI requiring treatment with either OR or EV. Data for the model, including perioperative and long-term overall mortality risks, disease-specific mortality risks, complications, and reintervention and patency rates, were retrieved from original studies and systematic reviews about CMI. Costs were analyzed with the 2013 Medicare database. Outcomes evaluated were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs from the health care perspective, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Extensive sensitivity analyses were performed and different clinical scenarios evaluated. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess robustness of the model., Results: For a reference-case 65-year-old female patient with CMI and an average risk for operation, EV is preferred with 10.03 QALYs (95% credibility interval [CI], 9.76-10.29) vs 9.59 after OR (95% CI, 9.29-9.87). The difference is comparable to 5 months in perfect health: 0.44 QALY (95% CI, 0.13-0.76). For 65-year-old men, this was 8.71 QALYs (95% CI, 8.48-8.94) for EV vs 8.42 (95% CI, 8.14-8.63) for OR. Sensitivity analysis showed that for younger patients, EV results in a higher increase in QALYs compared with older patients. Total expected reinterventions per patient are 1.70 for EV vs 0.30 for OR. Total expected health care costs for the reference-case patient were $39,942 (95% CI, $28,509-$53,380) for OR and $38.217 (95% CI, $29,329-$48,309) for EV. For men, this was $39,375 (95% CI, $28,092-$52,853) for OR and $35,903 (95% CI, $27,685-$45,597) for EV. For patients younger than 60 years, EV is a more expensive treatment strategy compared with OR, but with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for EV of less than $60,000/QALY. For patients 60 years and older, EV dominated OR as preferential treatment because effectiveness was higher than for OR and costs were lower., Conclusions: The results of this decision analysis model suggest that EV is favored over OR for patients with CMI in all age groups. Although EV is associated with more expected reinterventions, EV appears to be cost-effective for all age groups., (Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limb revascularization in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been criticized because of the low rates of limb preservation and overall survival that characterize this patient population. We undertook a formal cost-utility analysis to evaluate the role of revascularization in the ESRD population., Methods: A probabilistic Markov model was used to simulate the clinical outcomes and long-term outcomes after six different strategies for the management of nonhealing foot wounds in patients with critical limb ischemia and ESRD. All scenarios considered all-cause mortality and major amputation for failure of limb salvage. Parameter estimates of the costs, clinical events, and functional outcomes used in the model were derived from primary data or published literature. Costs are reported in 2011 U.S. dollars., Results: Local wound care alone had the lowest long-term total cost of the management strategies evaluated; primary amputation had the highest. Purely endovascular intervention yielded the highest limb salvage rates. Endovascular intervention had a cost of $15,403 per additional year of ambulation beyond that by local wound care alone. Endovascular intervention had the potential for cost-savings (ie, better health benefits at lower cost) only with very high 1-year wound healing rates. The 5-year survival rates ranged from 17% to 34% in all management strategies., Conclusions: Endovascular intervention may be a cost-effective alternative to local wound care alone for patients with ESRD and ischemic foot wounds, but with small marginal health benefits at considerable cost. Local wound care alone may be preferable to primary amputation., (Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease and is associated with a risk of limb loss. This vascular condition is currently treated with limb revascularization by surgery or endovascular intervention performed by a variety of specialists. Because both open vascular bypass and the less invasive endovascular therapy can be performed in selected patients with CLI, there exists significant disagreement as to which therapy should be performed first and which is more successful. The paucity of comparative effectiveness data to guide treatment of CLI has prompted a multidisciplinary effort to organize the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With CLI (BEST-CLI) trial. The BEST-CLI trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial that compares best endovascular therapy with best open surgical treatment in patients eligible for both treatments. BEST-CLI aims to provide urgently needed clinical guidance for CLI management by using a pragmatic design comparing the effectiveness of established techniques while allowing for the introduction of newer therapies as they become available; a novel primary endpoint that includes limb amputation rates, repeat intervention, and mortality; a multidisciplinary structure that fosters cooperation among interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, and vascular medicine specialists; and novel techniques to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and quality-of-life outcomes of the two treatment strategies being tested., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Revascularization and limb salvage attempts are often offered to patients with foot wounds and chronic limb ischemia who are thought to be good-risk candidates, but some skepticism remains about the utility of these efforts for elderly patients with marginal functional status. We sought to determine whether limb preservation efforts in this population could be justified from a patient-centered, cost-effectiveness perspective., Methods: A probabilistic Markov model was used to simulate the clinical outcomes, health utilities, and costs over a 10-year period with various management strategies. Clinical parameter estimates were obtained from previous clinical trials and large observational series. Cost estimates were obtained from cost literature and also a single-center study that reviewed total costs accumulated (including secondary amputations, wound care, outpatient nursing care, and nursing home costs). Cost (in 2011 U.S. dollars) per year of ambulation (with limb preservation or with a prosthesis after amputation) was the primary measure of cost-effectiveness., Results: The total 10-year costs of revascularization--either endovascular or surgical--were lower than the costs of either local wound care alone or primary amputation. Revascularization strategies also produced more health benefits as measured in terms of years of ambulatory ability, years of limb salvage, or quality-adjusted life-years. In none of the scenarios modeled in deterministic sensitivity analyses did primary amputation prove to be cost-effective., Conclusions: Revascularization and limb preservation attempts appear less costly and provide more health benefits than wound care alone or primary amputation, even among patients with marginal functional status at baseline., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), who are unsuitable for intervention, face the consequence of primary amputation. Sequential compression biomechanical device (SCBD) therapy provides a limb salvage option for these patients., Objectives: To assess the outcome of SCBD in patients with severe CLI who are unsuitable for revascularization. Primary end points were limb salvage and 30-day mortality., Methods: From 2005 to 2012, 189 patients with severe CLI were not suitable for revascularization. In all, 171 joined the SCBD program. We match controlled 75 primary amputations., Results: All patients were Rutherford category 4 or higher. Sustained clinical improvement was 68% at 1 year. Mean toe pressure increased from 19.9 to 35.42 mm Hg, P < .0001. Mean popliteal flow increased from 35.44 to 55.91 cm/sec, P < .0001. The 30-day mortality was 0.6%. Limb salvage was 94% at 5 years. Freedom from major adverse clinical events was 62.5%. All-cause survival was 69%. Median cost of managing a primary amputation patient is €29,815 compared to €3,985 for SCBD. We treated 171 patients with artassist at a cost of €681,965. However, primary amputation for 75 patients cost €2,236,125., Conclusion: The SCBD therapy is a cost-effective and clinically effective solution in patients with CLI having no option of revascularization. It provides adequate limb salvage while providing relief of rest pain without any intervention.

Background: Good-quality great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit for infrainguinal surgical revascularizations, but it is not available in all patients. We sought to identify the alternative conduit that would maximize cost-effectiveness in the context of infrapopliteal bypass for critical limb ischemia and nonhealing foot wounds., Methods: A Markov model was used to create a detailed simulation of 10-year outcomes in a hypothetical Edifoligide for the Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure (PREVENT) III-type patient cohort undergoing infrainguinal bypass for nonhealing foot wounds. The following management options were evaluated: (1) conservative therapy (local wound care, amputation as needed); (2) primary amputation; (3) bypass with autologous alternative vein (AAV), including arm or lesser saphenous vein; (4) bypass with GSV <3 mm in diameter; (5) bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); (6) cryopreserved venous allograft; and (7) cryopreserved arterial allograft. Estimates of 10-year total costs were incorporated into the model. Cost-effectiveness was measured in terms of incremental United States dollars per additional year of ambulation., Results: Bypass with AAV had the highest effectiveness as measured in median years of ambulation. After primary amputation, bypass with PTFE had the lowest total costs. With incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $5325 and $21,228, bypass with PTFE or AAV appeared to be cost-effective alternatives to conservative therapy for nonhealing ischemic wounds. Primary amputation, GSV <3 mm, and allograft options were dominated (ie, more costly and less effective). Primary amputation was weakly dominated., Conclusions: Bypass with PTFE or AAV appears to be a cost-effective option for the management of critical limb ischemia and nonhealing foot wounds when good-quality GSV is not available., (Published by Mosby, Inc.)

We aim to compare cool excimer laser-assisted angioplasty (CELA) versus tibial balloon angioplasty (TBA) in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) with tibial artery occlusive disease. The primary end point is sustained clinical improvement (SCI) and amputation-free survival (AFS). The secondary end points are binary restenosis, target extremity revascularization (TER), and cost-effectiveness. From June 2005 to October 2010, 1506 patients were referred with peripheral vascular disease and 572 with CLI. A total of 80 patients underwent 89 endovascular revascularizations (EVRs) for tibial occlusions, 47 using TBA and 42 using CELA. All patients were Rutherford category 4 to 6. Three-year SCI was enhanced with CELA (81%) compared to TBA (63.8%; P = .013). Three-year AFS significantly improved with CELA (95.2%) versus TBA (89.4%; P = .0165). Three-year freedom from TER was significantly improved with CELA (92.9%) versus 78.7% TBA (P = .026). Three-year freedom from MACE was comparable in both the groups (P = .455). Patients with CELA had significantly improved quality time without symptoms of disease or toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) at 3 years (10.5 months; P = .048) with incremental cost of €2073.19 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Tibial EVR provides exceptional outcome in CLI. The CELA has superior SCI, AFS, and freedom from TER, with improved Q-TWiST and cost-effectiveness.

Background: Socioeconomic inequalities in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality have been found in most European countries, but it is unclear to what extent inequalities in survival, as opposed to incidence, contribute to these inequalities in mortality. The author studied income-related inequalities in short-term and long-term case death after first hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and chronic ischaemic heart disease (CIHD), as well as inequalities in cardiovascular surgical procedures among patients admitted with IHD, in the Netherlands., Design: A nationwide prospective cohort study of patients first admitted for IHD., Data: Obtained by record linkage at individual level of national hospital discharge, cause of death, population and income registries., Patients: 15 416 patients admitted to a hospital with first episode of AMI and 31 209 patients admitted to a hospital with first episode of CIHD in the period 2003-2005., Main Outcome Measures: Differences by income quintile in short-term (28 days) and long-term (1 year) case death after first hospital admission with AMI and CIHD. Differences by income quintile in Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft operations among patients with first admission for AMI., Results: After adjustment for age, ethnicity and comorbidity, men and women in the lower income quintiles had a higher 28-day and 1-year case death after first hospitalisation with an AMI or CIHD. After adjustment for age and comorbidity, patients admitted to the hospital with a first AMI also had a lower probability of undergoing a PTCA procedure if they belonged to a lower income quintile. There were large between-hospital variations in inequalities in 28-day mortality for patients admitted with a first AMI., Conclusions: Higher mortality from IHD among lower income people is likely to be partly due to higher case death after first hospital admission. Inequalities in utilisation of PTCA and between-hospital variations in inequalities in outcomes suggest that inequalities in access to good quality care may play a role in explaining the higher case death of IHD among people with lower socioeconomic position. Further research is needed to elucidate the causes of these inequalities in case death.