Search

Daridorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of insomnia. Breast-cancer resistant protein (BCRP) is an efflux pump expressed in intestinal epithelium and hepatocytes, contributing to the absorption, distribution, and elimination of drugs and endogenous compounds. In vitro, daridorexant inhibits BCRP with an IC50 of 3.0 μmol/L. The BCRP substrate rosuvastatin is a cholesterol-lowering drug, recommended for clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. In order to exclude an inhibitory effect of daridorexant on BCRP, this single-centre, open-label, two-treatment Phase 1 study investigated the effect of daridorexant at steady state on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single-dose rosuvastatin in 20 healthy male subjects. In addition, safety and tolerability were assessed. A single oral dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 1 was followed by 96 hours observation. Thereafter, 25 mg daridorexant was administered once daily (o.d.) on Days 5-8 and in combination with 10 mg rosuvastatin on Day 8. On Days 9-12, subjects received 25 mg daridorexant alone. PK sampling was performed up to 120 hours after treatment administration. The results showed that concomitant administration of 25 mg daridorexant o.d. at steady state did not affect the exposure parameters of rosuvastatin in a relevant way, as indicated by the ratios of geometric means (GMRs) ([rosuvastatin + daridorexant]/[rosuvastatin alone]) of 0.93 for both Cmax and AUC0-∞ . Administration of a single dose of 10 mg rosuvastatin, multiple doses of 25 mg daridorexant alone or in combination were well tolerated. Taken together, daridorexant and BCRP substrates can be safely co-administered.

The last two decades have witnessed a rapid increase in the knowledge about the role of the orexin system, particularly in the regulation of wakefulness and arousal. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have been approved for the treatment of insomnia disorders (suvorexant, lemborexant) and drugs with a distinctive profile (daridorexant) or orexin-2 receptor selectivity (seltorexant) are in development.This review discusses pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety properties of orexin receptor antagonists (ORAs).In general, the drugs described have a similar effect on sleep characteristics although their pharmacokinetic variables differ. ORAs have the potential to revolutionize the pharmacological treatment of insomnia because they not only improve sleep, but, in addition, appear to have no dependence - and tolerance-inducing effects, which makes them suitable for long-term-treatment. The safety and tolerability profile of ORAs clearly differ from those of more traditional sleep-promoting drugs. Further research is needed to demonstrate benefits to patients suffering from insomnia disorder, e.g., with respect to improving not only sleep but also daytime functioning. In addition, ongoing and future research will show whether ORAs may have beneficial effects in patients with various psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease.

In 2015 and in 2016, there were an estimated 429,000–730,500 deaths caused by malaria.1–3 Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) is the cause of > 98% of malaria deaths and > 80% of malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa. Our goal is to field a vaccine that will prevent infection with Pf and thereby prevent all manifestations of Pf malaria and parasite transmission from humans to mosquitoes.4 Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (SPZ) are the only immunogens that have ever prevented Pf infection in > 90% of subjects.5–7 Sanaria® PfSPZ Vaccine (Sanaria Inc., Rockville, MD) is composed of radiation-attenuated, aseptic, purified, cryopreserved PfSPZ.8,9 When administered by rapid intravenous injection, PfSPZ Vaccine protected 100% (6/6) of malaria-naive subjects in the United States against mosquito bite–controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Pf parasites similar to those in the vaccine (homologous) 3 weeks after the last immunization,10 and 65% at 24 weeks.11 Protection was durable against homologous mosquito bite CHMI for at least 59 weeks12 and heterologous (parasites different than in vaccine) mosquito bite CHMI for at least 33 weeks.13 PfSPZ Vaccine also prevented naturally transmitted heterogeneous Pf in adults in Mali for at least 24 weeks (vaccine efficacy [VE] 52% by time to event and 29% by proportional analysis).14 We used the same dosage regimen as in the United States and Mali to evaluate the tolerability, safety, immunogenicity, and VE of PfSPZ Vaccine in young adult male Tanzanians. Previously, we had conducted the first modern CHMI in Africa and showed that injection of aseptic, purified, cryopreserved PfSPZ, Sanaria® PfSPZ Challenge, consistently infected Tanzanian volunteers and subsequently repeated in multiple other countries.15–21 In this study, we took advantage of this capability to assess VE of PfSPZ Vaccine by CHMI with PfSPZ Challenge (NF54). The same PfSPZ Vaccine dosage regimen was less immunogenic and protective in Tanzanians than in Americans,11 and VE against homologous CHMI in Tanzania was lower (or similar) to VE against intense field exposure to heterogeneous Pf parasites in Mali.14

Immunization with attenuated Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (PfSPZs) has been shown to be protective against malaria, but the features of the antibody response induced by this treatment remain unclear. To investigate this response in detail, we isolated IgM and IgG monoclonal antibodies from Tanzanian volunteers who were immunized with repeated injection of Sanaria PfSPZ Vaccine and who were found to be protected from controlled human malaria infection with infectious homologous PfSPZs. All isolated IgG monoclonal antibodies bound to P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) and recognized distinct epitopes in its N terminus, NANP-repeat region, and C terminus. Strikingly, the most effective antibodies, as determined in a humanized mouse model, bound not only to the repeat region, but also to a minimal peptide at the PfCSP N-terminal junction that is not in the RTS,S vaccine. These dual-specific antibodies were isolated from different donors and were encoded by VH3-30 or VH3-33 alleles that encode tryptophan or arginine at position 52. Using structural and mutational data, we describe the elements required for germline recognition and affinity maturation. Our study provides potent neutralizing antibodies and relevant information for lineage-targeted vaccine design and immunization strategies.

Background The assessment of antibody responses after immunization with radiation-attenuated, aseptic, purified, cryopreserved Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites (Sanaria PfSPZ Vaccine) has focused on IgG isotype antibodies. Here, we aimed to investigate if P. falciparum sporozoite binding and invasion-inhibitory IgM antibodies are induced following immunization of malaria-preexposed volunteers with PfSPZ Vaccine. Methods Using serum from volunteers immunized with PfSPZ, we measured vaccine-induced IgG and IgM antibodies to P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein (PfCSP) via ELISA. Function of this serum as well as IgM antibody fractions was measured via in vitro in an inhibition of sporozoite invasion assay. These IgM antibody fractions were also measured for binding to sporozoites by immunofluorescence assay and complement fixation on whole sporozoites. Results We found that in addition to anti-PfCSP IgG, malaria-preexposed volunteers developed anti-PfCSP IgM antibodies after immunization with PfSPZ Vaccine and that these IgM antibodies inhibited P. falciparum sporozoite invasion of hepatocytes in vitro. These IgM plasma fractions also fixed complement to whole P. falciparum sporozoites. Conclusions This is the first finding that PfCSP and P. falciparum sporozoite-binding IgM antibodies are induced following immunization of PfSPZ Vaccine in malaria-preexposed individuals and that IgM antibodies can inhibit P. falciparum sporozoite invasion into hepatocytes in vitro and fix complement on sporozoites. These findings indicate that the immunological assessment of PfSPZ Vaccine-induced antibody responses could be more sensitive if they include parasite-specific IgM in addition to IgG antibodies. Clinical trials registration NCT02132299.

In two previously described donors, the extracellular domain of LAIR1, a collagen-binding inhibitory receptor encoded on chromosome 19 (ref. 1), was inserted between the V and DJ segments of an antibody. This insertion generated, through somatic mutations, broadly reactive antibodies against RIFINs, a type of variant antigen expressed on the surface of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. To investigate how frequently such antibodies are produced in response to malaria infection, we screened plasma from two large cohorts of individuals living in malaria-endemic regions. Here we report that 5-10% of malaria-exposed individuals, but none of the European blood donors tested, have high levels of LAIR1-containing antibodies that dominate the response to infected erythrocytes without conferring enhanced protection against febrile malaria. By analysing the antibody-producing B cell clones at the protein, cDNA and gDNA levels, we characterized additional LAIR1 insertions between the V and DJ segments and discovered a second insertion modality whereby the LAIR1 exon encoding the extracellular domain and flanking intronic sequences are inserted into the switch region. By exon shuffling, this mechanism leads to the production of bispecific antibodies in which the LAIR1 domain is precisely positioned at the elbow between the VH and CH1 domains. Additionally, in one donor the genomic DNA encoding the VH and CH1 domains was deleted, leading to the production of a camel-like LAIR1-containing antibody. Sequencing of the switch regions of memory B cells from European blood donors revealed frequent templated inserts originating from transcribed genes that, in rare cases, comprised exons with orientations and frames compatible with expression. These results reveal different modalities of LAIR1 insertion that lead to public and dominant antibodies against infected erythrocytes and suggest that insertion of templated DNA represents an additional mechanism of antibody diversification that can be selected in the immune response against pathogens and exploited for B cell engineering.