Search

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with substantial financial cost, including increased out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses. Associations and impact of OOP costs are poorly understood.The aim of the study was to characterize the impact and associations of OOP health care expenses for AD.A 25-question online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members (N = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents aged ≥18 years; self-reported AD or primary caregiver of individual with AD) were met by 77.3% (1118 of 1447).Respondents with monthly OOP expenses greater than $200 were more likely to have increased AD severity, flares, health care provider visits, prescription polypharmacy, use of step-up therapy, frequent skin infections, and poorer disease control ( P0.005 for all). Respondents with OOP yearly expenditures greater than $1000 had similar associations and additionally increased rates of comorbid asthma, allergic rhinitis, and anxiety/depression ( P0.005 for all). A total of 64.6% (n = 624) reported harmful household financial impact of OOP expenses. Predictors of harmful impact included severe AD (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.62 [1.11-6.19], P = 0.04), comorbid asthma (1.42 [1.07-1.87], P = 0.03), 5 health care provider visits or more in a year (2.80 [1.62-4.82], P = 0.0007), greater than $200 OOP monthly expenditures (2.16 [1.45-3.22], 0.0006), and $1000 annual OOP expenditures or more (4.56 [3.31-6.27], P0.0001).Out-of-pocket expenses for AD significantly impact household finances. Clinical interventions are needed to minimize OOP expenses while optimizing care outcomes.Capsule Summary:• Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with significant financial cost, including increased out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, although the impact and associations of OOP health care expenses for AD management are not well understood.• The OOP health care expenses related to AD are associated with increased disease severity and health care utilization and significantly impact the household finances of patients and caregivers.• Health care providers should be mindful of the OOP financial burden related to AD management and engage in shared decision making to create a treatment plan that is practical and effective and minimizes household financial impact.

Black race is associated with increased atopic dermatitis (AD) severity and healthcare resource utilization. However, the burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses among black individuals with AD is not well understood. We sought to characterize the categories and impact of OOP healthcare expenses associated with AD management among black individuals. A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members (N = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥ 18 years; self-report of AD or primary caregivers of individuals with AD) was met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. Black individuals with AD were younger, had lower household income, Medicaid, urban residence, poor AD control and frequent skin infections (P ≤ 0.02). Blacks vs. non-blacks reported more OOP costs for prescription medications covered (74.2% vs. 63.6%, P = 0.04) and not covered (65.1% vs. 46.5%, P = 0.0004) by insurance, emergency room visits (22.1% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.005), and outpatient laboratory testing (33.3% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.01). Black race was associated with increased household financial impact from OOP expenses (P = 0.0009), and predictors of financial impact included minimally controlled AD (adjusted OR [95% CI] 13.88 [1.63–117.96], P = 0.02), systemic therapy (4.34 [1.63–11.54], 0.003), > $200 monthly OOP expenses (14.28 [3.42–59.60], P = 0.0003), and Medicaid (4.02 [1.15–14.07], P = 0.03). Blacks with Medicaid had higher odds of harmful financial impact (3.32 [1.77–6.24], P = 0.0002) than those of black race (1.81 [1.04–3.15], P = 0.04) or with Medicaid (1.39 [1.02–1.88], P = 0.04) alone. Black race is associated with increased OOP costs for AD and significant household financial impact. Targeted interventions are needed to address financial disparities in AD.

Engaging in shared decision-making (SDM) can help patients understand and choose treatments according to their values and has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and adherence with treatment. It is well suited for conditions like eczema for which several medically appropriate treatment options exist. However, little is known about the use and experience of SDM in eczema.To understand experiences, preferences, and expectations for SDM in eczema care settings from the patient and caregiver perspective.The National Eczema Association conducted an online survey in January 2021 among self-selected patients and caregivers. Inclusion criteria (US resident, patient with eczema or caregiver of a patient with eczema aged ≤17 years, respondent age ≥18 years) were met by 1313 of 1387 respondents (94.7%). Data analysis was performed from May 2021 to November 2021.Outcomes were past SDM (using a 9-item SDM questionnaire [SDMQ9]; score ranges transformed to 0-100), present SDM (Control Preferences Scale), and future SDM (self-reported confidence and motivation to engage in SDM) behavior.Among the 1313 respondents included in the study, most were female (1046 of 1313 [79.7%]) adult (1086 of 1313 [82.7%]) patients with a mean (SD) patient Recap of Atopic Eczema score of 11.7 (7.2), mean (SD) patient age of 39.5 (22.2) years, and mean (SD) SDMQ9 score of 65.1 (27.4). For present SDM, 479 of 966 (49.6%) reported "I prefer to make the final decision after seriously considering my doctor's opinion," and 655 of 955 (69.4%) reported being very or extremely confident to engage in SDM in the future. Those who reported feeling "very well informed" about the causes of eczema had a 14.7-point higher (95% CI, 9.2-20.2; P .001, multiple linear regression) SDMQ9 score than those "not adequately informed" and were 3.4 times more likely (95% CI, 2.1-5.7; P .001, multiple logistic regression) to be confident to engage in future SDM. Respondents reported that they would be motivated to engage in SDM if the clinician initiated SDM, valued input from the patient, and acknowledged that patients are experts on their own bodies or if a treatment is no longer working.Results of this survey study suggest that a majority of patients with eczema and caregivers prefer a large role in decision-making for their care and that clinicians can initiate and facilitate SDM to improve patient satisfaction with care.

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with considerable financial cost. However, the full burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses is not well understood. Objective We sought to characterize the OOP health care expenses associated with AD management. Methods A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members worldwide (n = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥18 years who either self-reported had AD or were primary caregivers of individuals with AD) were met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. Results Respondents reported OOP expenses in 3 categories: (1) health care providers and prescriptions, including health care provider visit deductibles (68.7% [686]), prescription co-pays (64.3% [635]), and prescriptions not covered by insurance (48.6% [468]); (2) nonprescription health care products, including moisturizers (94.3% [934]), hygiene products (85.0% [824], allergy medications (75.1% [715]), itch relievers (68.25% [647]), dietary supplements (52.2% [491]), and sleep aids (37.0% [336]); and (3) complementary approaches, including cleaning products (74.7% [732]), clothing/bedding (44.8% [430]), alternative medications (19.0% [180]), and adjunctive therapies (15.9% [150]). The median annual AD OOP expense was US $600 (range, US $0-$200,000), with 41.9% (364) reporting expenditures US $1000 or greater. Conclusions Out-of-pocket expenses place a significant financial burden on individuals with AD. Additional studies are needed to better understand associations and impact of OOP costs.

Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with considerable financial cost. However, the full burden of out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses is not well understood. Objective We sought to characterize the OOP health care expenses associated with AD management. Methods A 25-question voluntary online survey was administered to National Eczema Association members worldwide (n = 113,502). Inclusion criteria (US residents age ≥18 years who either self-reported had AD or were primary caregivers of individuals with AD) were met by 77.3% (1118/1447) of respondents. Results Respondents reported OOP expenses in 3 categories: (1) health care providers and prescriptions, including health care provider visit deductibles (68.7% [686]), prescription co-pays (64.3% [635]), and prescriptions not covered by insurance (48.6% [468]); (2) nonprescription health care products, including moisturizers (94.3% [934]), hygiene products (85.0% [824], allergy medications (75.1% [715]), itch relievers (68.25% [647]), dietary supplements (52.2% [491]), and sleep aids (37.0% [336]); and (3) complementary approaches, including cleaning products (74.7% [732]), clothing/bedding (44.8% [430]), alternative medications (19.0% [180]), and adjunctive therapies (15.9% [150]). The median annual AD OOP expense was US $600 (range, US $0–$200,000), with 41.9% (364) reporting expenditures US $1000 or greater. Conclusions Out-of-pocket expenses place a significant financial burden on individuals with AD. Additional studies are needed to better understand associations and impact of OOP costs.

A series of metal-organic networks of CuSCN were prepared by direct reactions with substituted pyridine and aliphatic amine ligands, L. Thiocyanate bridging is seen in all but 1 of 11 new X-ray structures. Structures are reported for (CuSCN)L sheets (L = 3-chloro- and 3-bromopyridine, N-methylmorpholine), ladders (L = 2-ethylpyridine, N-methylpiperidine), and chains (L = 2,4,6-collidine). X-ray structures of (CuSCN)L(2) are chains (L = 4-ethyl- and 4-t-butylpyridine, piperidine, and morpholine). A unique N-thiocyanato monomer structure, (CuSCN)(3-ethylpyridine)(3), is also reported. In most cases, amine ligands are thermally released at temperatures100 °C. Strong yellow-to-green luminescence at ambient temperature is observed for the substituted pyridine complexes. High solid state quantum efficiencies are seen for many of the CuSCN-L complexes. Microsecond phosphorescence lifetimes seen for CuSCN-L are in direct contrast to the nanosecond-lifetime emission of CuSCN. MLCT associated with pyridine π* orbitals is proposed as the excitation mechanism.