Search

In 2016, we published a method for processing dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) data called system-independent rho-e/Z-e ( $\rho _{\mathrm {e}}/Z_{\mathrm {e}}$ ) or SIRZ. Using data from multiple DECT systems and spectra, SIRZ estimated the electron density $\rho _{\mathrm {e}}$ and effective atomic number $Z_{\mathrm {e}}$ (based on published X-ray cross sections), for a set of known specimens. However, the decomposition process required complex spectral modeling of the DECT system, which made SIRZ difficult to implement and automate. This paper describes the subsequent work on “SIRZ-2” to simplify the spectral modeling, automate the process, and improve its range and versatility. The SIRZ-2 basis functions are more accurate for the X-ray energy range ( $Z_{\mathrm {e}}$ of 6–20) were scanned with multiple spectral pairs (up to 200 keV) on seven different DECT systems, including a commercial airport luggage scanner. For these varied tests, the average SIRZ-2 relative errors for $\rho _{\mathrm {e}}$ estimates were four times lower (0.7% compared to 3.0% for SIRZ), while average $Z_{\mathrm {e}}$ relative errors were comparably low for both methods ( $\rho _{\mathrm {e}}$ , $Z_{\mathrm {e}}$ ) that can be directly compared across DECT systems and over time.

We present a new decomposition approach for dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) called SIRZ that provides precise and accurate material description, independent of the scanner, over diagnostic energy ranges (30 to 200 keV). System independence is achieved by explicitly including a scanner-specific spectral description in the decomposition method, and a new X-ray-relevant feature space. The feature space consists of electron density, ${\rho _{\rm e}}$ , and a new effective atomic number, ${{\rm Z}_{\rm e}}$ , which is based on published X-ray cross sections. Reference materials are used in conjunction with the system spectral response so that additional beam-hardening correction is not necessary. The technique is tested against other methods on DECT data of known specimens scanned by diverse spectra and systems. Uncertainties in accuracy and precision are less than 3% and 2% respectively for the ( ${\rho _{\rm e}}$ , ${{\rm Z}_{\rm e}}$ ) results compared to prior methods that are inaccurate and imprecise (over 9%).