1. Identification and prioritization of factors influencing organization risk tolerance level
- Author
-
Isa Masoumi, Shiba Masoumi, and Mohammad A. Khalilzadeh
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,Actuarial science ,Computer science ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Population ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Validity ,TOPSIS ,02 engineering and technology ,General Business, Management and Accounting ,Project manager ,Ranking ,Sample size determination ,Statistical population ,021105 building & construction ,0502 economics and business ,education ,business ,050203 business & management ,Risk management - Abstract
Purpose Identifying and prioritizing the risks are considered as critical issues in risk management; otherwise, non-considering the risks will lead to the problems such as delays in project implementation, increased costs, loss of reputation, loss of clients, reduced revenue and liquidity and even bankruptcy. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the factors influencing the organization risk tolerance level were identified. Then, the factors increasing and decreasing the risk tolerance level were determined by a decision-making model. Finally, a comprehensive model was considered for risk measuring and preparing a risk failure structure chart, in order to determine the factors influencing it as well as the measurement criteria and then they were ranked using the taxonomy method. In this study, the size of the statistical population was 130 (six small and medium manufacturer and service provider companies). Based on Cochran’s sample size formula, 97 questionnaires containing 30 questions were randomly distributed among the population. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed. The data were analyzed by SPSS 22. Findings Given the hypotheses of this study, the first hypothesis was rejected and the other hypotheses were accepted. The final ranking was done using the taxonomy method; the personality of the project manager was ranked at first; income, credit and capital were ranked second and the number of personnel was ranked third. Moreover, the TOPSIS method was used for ranking to compare the results. Originality/value In this research, the identification and ranking of these factors have taken place in several small- and medium-sized organizations; in addition, the rankings are conducted using the taxonomy decision-making method.
- Published
- 2019