Search

There are limited data from the US on outcomes of patients in specialty care for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).CASCADE FH Registry data were analyzed to assess longitudinal changes in medication usage, in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke or transient ischemic attack) in adults with FH followed in US specialty clinics.The cohort consisted of 1900 individuals (61% women, 87% Caucasian), with mean age of 56 ± 15 years, 37% prevalence of ASCVD at enrollment, mean pretreatment LDL-C 249 ± 68 mg/dl, mean enrollment LDL-C 145 mg/dl and 93% taking lipid lowering therapy. Over follow up of 20 ± 11 months, lipid lowering therapy use increased (mean decrease in LDL-C of 32 mg/dl (p0.001)). Only 48% of participants achieved LDL-C100 mg/dl and 22% achieved LDL-C70 mg/dl; ASCVD at enrollment was associated with greater likelihood of goal achievement. MACE event rates were almost 6 times higher among patients with prior ASCVD compared to those without (4.6 vs 0.8/100 patient years). Also associated with incident MACE were markers of FH severity and conventional ASCVD risk factors.With care in FH specialized clinics, LDL-C decreased, but LDL-C persisted100 mg/dl in 52% of patients. High ASCVD event rates suggest that adults with FH warrant designation as having an ASCVD risk equivalent. Earlier and more aggressive therapy of FH is needed to prevent ASCVD events.

Although awareness of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is increasing, this common, potentially fatal, treatable condition remains underdiagnosed. Despite FH being a genetic disorder, genetic testing is rarely used. The Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation convened an international expert panel to assess the utility of FH genetic testing. The rationale includes the following: 1) facilitation of definitive diagnosis; 2) pathogenic variants indicate higher cardiovascular risk, which indicates the potential need for more aggressive lipid lowering; 3) increase in initiation of and adherence to therapy; and 4) cascade testing of at-risk relatives. The Expert Consensus Panel recommends that FH genetic testing become the standard of care for patients with definite or probable FH, as well as for their at-risk relatives. Testing should include the genes encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9); other genes may also need to be considered for analysis based on patient phenotype. Expected outcomes include greater diagnoses, more effective cascade testing, initiation of therapies at earlier ages, and more accurate risk stratification.

To review how leveraging familial hypercholesterolemia registries can impact molecular genetic research and precision medicine.Familial hypercholesterolemia is both much more common and more phenotypically heterogeneous than previously thought with some evidence for significant genotype to phenotype correlations. Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia is becoming both more widely available and cheaper, spurring conversations about its clinical utility.In most countries, familial hypercholesterolemia is underdiagnosed and diagnosed later in life, often after the onset of coronary heart disease (CHD). Familial hypercholesterolemia is undertreated; low goal attainment and additional modifiable risk factors further increase CHD risk. Familial hypercholesterolemia epitomizes the goal of precision medicine to define a subset of individuals with a high risk of morbidity and mortality through genetic diagnosis to manage and treat the risk accordingly. Genetic cascade screening can be used to identify familial hypercholesterolemia patients at a younger age and start timely treatment to prevent CHD. Familial hypercholesterolemia registries are tools for clinical research and improving healthcare planning and patient care. As genotype and phenotype correlations in familial hypercholesterolemia become increasingly understood, this information will likely play a more important role in diagnosis and treatment especially as the cost of genetic testing continues to decline.

To describe enrollment characteristics of youth in the Cascade Screening for Awareness and Detection of FH Registry.This is a cross-sectional analysis of 493 participants aged18 years with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia recruited from US lipid clinics (n = 20) between April 1, 2014, and January 12, 2018. At enrollment, some were new patients and some were already in care. Clinical characteristics are described, including lipid levels and lipid-lowering treatments.Mean age at diagnosis was 9.4 (4.0) years; 47% female, 68% white and 12% Hispanic. Average (SD) highest Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 238 (61) mg/dL before treatment. Lipid-lowering therapy was used by 64% of participants; 56% were treated with statin. LDL-C declined 84 mg/dL (33%) among those treated with lipid-lowering therapy; statins produced the greatest decline, 100 mg/dL (39% reduction). At enrollment, 39% had reached an LDL-C goal, either130 mg/dL or ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment; 20% of those on lipid-lowering therapy reached both goals.Among youth enrolled in the Cascade Screening for Awareness and Detection of FH Registry, diagnosis occurred relatively late, only 77% of children eligible for lipid-lowering therapy were receiving treatment, and only 39% of those treated met their LDL-C goal. Opportunities exist for earlier diagnosis, broader use of lipid-lowering therapy, and greater reduction of LDL-C levels.

PURPOSE Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common Mendelian disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol levels, which if untreated can cause premature heart disease. Less than 10% of cases in the United States are diagnosed. This study investigates decision-making factors associated with intentions to have FH genetic testing among patients clinically diagnosed with FH. METHODS Fifty-three clinically diagnosed adults with FH and no genetic testing were recruited through the FH Foundation and lipid clinics. Participants completed a survey containing items capturing various reasons to engage in genetic testing. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis of survey items identified three factors: (a) aversion to FH genetic information, (b) curiosity regarding medical/family history, (c) and psychological reassurance. Psychological reassurance was, in turn, the only significant predictor of genetic testing intentions. The positive effect of reassurance on genetic testing intention was moderated by aversion such that individuals who were low in reassurance were more inclined to decline testing if aversion was high. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that clinically diagnosed patients' decisions about FH genetic testing are driven principally by psychological reassurance, particularly when low in aversion to FH genetic information.

PurposeFamilial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common Mendelian disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol levels, which if untreated can cause premature heart disease. Less than 10% of cases in the US are diagnosed, and uptake of genetic testing is suboptimal. This study investigates decisionmaking factors associated with intentions to have FH genetic testing among patients clinically diagnosed with FH.MethodsClinically diagnosed adults with FH and no genetic testing were recruited through the FH Foundation and lipid clinics. Participants completed a survey containing items capturing various reasons to engage in genetic testing.ResultsExploratory factor analysis of survey items identified three factors: (1) aversion to FH genetic information, (2) curiosity regarding medical/family history, (3) and psychological reassurance. Psychological reassurance was, in turn, the only significant predictor of genetic testing intentions. The effect of reassurance was qualified by aversion such that the inverse association between aversion and genetic testing intentions was greater among those with low perceived reassurance.ConclusionFindings suggest that clinically diagnosed patients’ decisions about FH genetic testing are driven principally by psychological reassurance.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common inherited form of high cholesterol that significantly increases the risk for coronary artery disease. Early detection and treatment can decrease morbidity and mortality and provide important risk information to family members. However, FH remains vastly underdiagnosed and undertreated. Cascade screening is the process of iteratively testing first-degree relatives for a genetic disease. It has been shown to effectively identify individuals with undiagnosed FH. The majority of research on methods for cascade screening has been conducted outside of the United States (U.S.). For indirect contact, index cases encourage relatives to undergo testing, and for direct contact, healthcare providers (HCP) obtain the index case's consent to contact relatives and offer information. Currently, there is not an accepted strategy for cascade screening programs in the U.S. This study investigated perspectives on direct and indirect contact for cascade screening from individuals with FH. An online survey was designed in collaboration with the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation (FHF). Fifty-eight percent of U.S. index cases (11/19, 57.9%) and all international index cases (8/8, 100%) indicated willingness to provide contact information for certain at-risk relatives to a HCP for the purpose of directly informing relatives of their risk for FH in a hypothetical scenario. These findings provide an example of U.S. data and additional international data suggesting that some individuals with FH may consider direct contact a reasonable approach to improve screening uptake among family members. These initial findings need further confirmation in a larger group.

Background Barriers to genetic testing and subsequent family cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) include cost, patient and provider awareness, privacy and discrimination concerns, need for a physician order, underutilization of genetic counselors, and family concerns about the implications of genetic testing for care. Objectives The objective of the study was to determine the uptake of genetic testing with cost and privacy removed. Methods The FH Foundation offered free genetic testing and counseling to patients in the patient portal of the CASCADE FH Registry, who had not previously undergone genetic testing for 3 genes associated with FH (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9). The free testing offer was extended to first-degree relatives of participants who had a positive genetic test result for cascade screening. Results Of 435 eligible patients, 147 opted in to participate, 122 consented, and 110 (68.2% female, median age: 52 years) received genetic testing. Of the participants, 64 had a positive genetic test result for a pathogenic variant in LDLR (59) or APOB (5); 11 had a variant of uncertain significance. Only 3 first-degrees relatives underwent genetic testing. Conclusions Although there was substantial interest in genetic testing, uptake of family cascade screening was poor. Innovative approaches to increase family cascade screening should be explored.

Item does not contain fulltext AIMS: Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia (hoADH), an orphan disease caused by mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), or proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), is characterized by elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and high risk for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). The exact prevalence of molecularly defined hoADH is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence and phenotypical characteristics of this disease in an open society, i.e. the Netherlands. METHODS AND RESULTS: The database of the nationwide ADH molecular diagnostic center was queried to identify all molecularly defined hoADH patients. Carriers of non-pathogenic mutations were excluded. Medical records were analysed for data regarding lipid levels and CVD events. Of 104 682 individuals screened for molecular defects, 49 were classified as hoADH (0.05%); 20 were true homozygotes, 25 were compound heterozygotes for LDLR mutations, and 4 were homozygous for APOB mutations. No bi-allelic PCSK9 mutation carriers were identified. Consequently, the prevalence of hoADH was estimated to be approximately 1 : 300 000. Mean LDL-C levels prior to lipid-lowering treatment were 12.9 +/- 5.1 mmol/L (range 4.4-21.5 mmol/L). Surprisingly, only 50% of the patients met the clinical criteria for hoADH (LDL-C >13.0 mmol/L); 29% of patients suffered from a CVD event. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of molecularly defined hoADH is much higher and the clinical phenotype is more variable than previously assumed. In light of the fact that novel therapies are, or will be registered for the treatment of hoADH patients, an uniform definition of hoADH either as a phenotypic or molecular entity is warranted in order to identify patients who are considered to be eligible for these novel agents.

Mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene cause familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disorder characterized by coronary heart disease (CHD) at young age. We aimed to apply an extreme sampling method to enhance the statistical power to identify novel genetic risk variants for CHD in individuals with FH. We selected cases and controls with an extreme contrast in CHD risk from 17 000 FH patients from the Netherlands, whose functional LDLR mutation was unequivocally established. The genome-wide association (GWA) study was performed on 249 very young FH cases with CHD and 217 old FH controls without CHD (above 65 years for males and 70 years of age for females) using the Illumina HumanHap550K chip. In the next stage, two independent samples (one from the Netherlands and one from Italy, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom) of FH patients were used as replication samples. In the initial GWA analysis, we identified 29 independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with suggestive associations with premature CHD (P

Most familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients remain undertreated, and it is unclear what role health disparities may play for FH patients in the US. We sought to describe sex and racial/ethnic disparities in a national registry of US FH patients.We analyzed data from 3167 adults enrolled in the CAscade SCreening for Awareness and DEtection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (CASCADE-FH) registry. Logistic regression was used to evaluate for disparities in LDL-C goals and statin use, with adjustments for covariates including age, cardiovascular risk factors, and statin intolerance.In adjusted analyses, women were less likely than men to achieve treated LDL-C of100 mg/dL (OR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.57-0.82) or ≥50% reduction from pretreatment LDL-C (OR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.65-0.96). Women were less likely than men to receive statin therapy (OR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.50-0.73) and less likely to receive a high-intensity statin (OR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.49-0.72). LDL-C goal achievement also varied by race/ethnicity: compared with whites, Asians and blacks were less likely to achieve LDL-C levels100 mg/dL (Asians, OR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.24-0.94; blacks, OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.32-0.74) or ≥50% reduction from pretreatment LDL-C (Asians, OR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.32-0.98; blacks, OR 0.62, 95% CI, 0.43-0.90).In a contemporary US population of FH patients, we identified differences in LDL-C goal attainment and statin usage after stratifying the population by either sex or race/ethnicity. Our findings suggest that health disparities contribute to the undertreatment of US FH patients. Increased efforts are warranted to raise awareness of these disparities.

Background— Cardiovascular disease burden and treatment patterns among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in the United States remain poorly described. In 2013, the FH Foundation launched the Cascade Screening for Awareness and Detection (CASCADE) of FH Registry to address this knowledge gap. Methods and Results— We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1295 adults with heterozygous FH enrolled in the CASCADE-FH Registry from 11 US lipid clinics. Median age at initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was 39 years, and median age at FH diagnosis was 47 years. Prevalent coronary heart disease was reported in 36% of patients, and 61% exhibited 1 or more modifiable risk factors. Median untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 239 mg/dL. At enrollment, median LDL-C was 141 mg/dL; 42% of patients were taking high-intensity statin therapy and 45% received >1 LDL-lowering medication. Among FH patients receiving LDL-lowering medication(s), 25% achieved an LDL-C 1 LDL-lowering medication (1.80; 1.34–2.41). Conclusions— FH patients in the CASCADE-FH Registry are diagnosed late in life and often do not achieve adequate LDL-C lowering, despite a high prevalence of coronary heart disease and risk factors. These findings highlight the need for earlier diagnosis of FH and initiation of lipid-lowering therapy, more consistent use of guideline-recommended LDL-lowering therapy, and comprehensive management of traditional coronary heart disease risk factors.

In the US familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), patients are underidentified, despite an estimated prevalence of 1:200 to 1:500. Criteria to identify FH patients include Simon Broome, Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN), or Make Early Diagnosis to Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED). The use of these criteria in US clinical practices remains unclear.To characterize the FH diagnostic criteria applied by US lipid specialists participating in the FH Foundation's CASCADE FH (CAscade SCreening for Awareness and DEtection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia) patient registry.We performed an observational, cross-sectional analysis of diagnostic criteria chosen for each adult patient, both overall and by baseline patient characteristics, at 15 clinical sites that had contributed data to the registry as of September 8, 2015. A sample of 1867 FH adults was analyzed. The median age at FH diagnosis was 50 years, and the median pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) value was 238 mg/dL. The main outcome was the diagnostic criteria chosen. Diagnostic criteria were divided into five nonexclusive categories: "clinical diagnosis," MEDPED, Simon Broome, DLCN, and other.Most adults enrolled in CASCADE FH (55.0%) received a "clinical diagnosis." The most commonly used formal criteria was Simon-Broome only (21%), followed by multiple diagnostic criteria (16%), MEDPED only (7%), DLCN only (1%), and other (0.5%), P .0001. Of the patients with only a "clinical diagnosis," 93% would have met criteria for Simon Broome, DLCN, or MEDPED based on the data available in the registry.Our findings demonstrate heterogeneity in the application of FH diagnostic criteria in the United States. A nationwide consensus definition may lead to better identification, earlier treatment, and ultimately CHD prevention.

Aims A plethora of mutations in the LDL-receptor gene ( LDLR ) underlie the clinical phenotype of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). For the diagnosis of FH, it is important, however, to discriminate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic mutations. The aim of the current study was to assess whether true pathogenic mutations were indeed associated with the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) when compared with non-functional variants. The latter variants should not exhibit such an association with CAD. Methods and results We assessed 29 365 individuals tested the 64 most prevalent LDLR variants. First, we determined pathogenicity for each of these sequence variants. Subsequently, a Cox-proportional hazard model was used to compare event-free survival, defined as the period from birth until the first CAD event, between carriers and non-carriers of LDLR mutations. Fifty-four sequence variants in the LDLR gene were labelled as pathogenic and 10 as non-pathogenic. The 9 912 carriers of a pathogenic LDLR mutation had a shorter event-free survival than the 18 393 relatives who did not carry that mutation; hazard ratio 3.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.24–4.08; P < 0.001]. In contrast, the 355 carriers of a non-pathogenic LDLR variant had similar event-free survival as the 705 non-carrying relatives; hazard ratio 1.00 (95% CI: 0.52–1.94; P = 0.999). Conclusion These findings with respect to clinical outcomes substantiate our criteria for functionality of LDLR sequence variants. They also confirm the CAD risk associated with FH and underline that these criteria can be used to decide whether a specific sequence variant should be used in cascade screening.

A decade ago, in the initial stage of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) in The Netherlands, it was reported that such screening decreased access to affordable life insurance for mutation carriers. In 2003, in order to improve access to insurance for FH mutation carriers, insurers agreed to underwrite according to a set of guidelines. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed whether access to insurance has improved since the advent of these guidelines. We approached 2825 subjects that had participated in the genetic testing for FH between 1998 and 2003. We compared unconditional acceptance rates before and after FH diagnosis and before and after the guidelines were issued by means of logistic regression analysis. Our study outcome pertains to 414 FH patients who applied for life insurance. Unconditional acceptance of a policy before DNA diagnosis and before the issue of guidelines occurred in 182 out of 255 (71%) cases, versus 27 out of 35 (77%) cases after DNA diagnosis, but before the issue of guidelines. De facto, 107 out of 124 (86%) patients received unconditional acceptance after DNA diagnosis and after the issue of guidelines (P for trend=0.002). Access to life insurance improved for FH patients after molecular diagnosis and it improved even further after the guidelines were issued. Therefore, we argue that limited access to life insurance on the basis of 'DNA discrimination' is no longer a valid argument against genetic cascade testing for FH, at least not in our country. European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) 20, 722-728; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.5; published online 1 February 2012

Background— Genetic cascade screening for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) revealed that 15% of individuals given this diagnosis do not exhibit elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. We assessed whether cardiovascular risk for these individuals differs from that of hypercholesterolemic FH heterozygotes and unaffected relatives. Methods and Results— Individuals aged 18 to 55 years were recruited within 18 months after genetic screening. Three groups were studied: subjects given a molecular diagnosis of FH and with LDL-C levels at genetic screening below the 75th percentile (FH-low), subjects with FH and an LDL-C level above the 90th percentile (FH-high), and subjects without FH (no-FH). We measured carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) by ultrasonography. Differences in carotid IMT among the groups were assessed using multivariate linear regression analyses. Mean carotid IMT of 114 subjects in the FH-low group (0.623 mm; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.638 mm) was significantly smaller than that of 162 subjects in the FH-high group (0.664 mm; 95% CI, 0.648 to 0.679 mm; P P =0.67). Conclusions— Our findings suggest that the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with FH to a large extent is related to LDL-C levels and not to the presence of a mutation per se. Consequently, this study cautiously suggests that individuals with an FH genotype without expression of hypercholesterolemia may not require a pharmaceutical intervention that is as aggressive as the standard for subjects with FH.

De praktijkondersteuner begeleidt patienten met risicofactoren voor hart- en vaatziekten zoals hypertensie, patienten met diabetes mellitus type 2 en patienten die een hart- en vaatziekte hebben doorgemaakt. Een risicofactor waar de praktijkondersteuner regelmatig mee te maken krijgt is een verhoogd serumcholesterol.1 Onder de groep patienten met een verhoogd cholesterol is een kleine groep met hoge waarden op basis van een erfelijke aandoening. Het gaat hier om familiaire hypercholesterolemie (FH), een stofwisselingsziekte, waarbij de receptoren voor het LDL-cholesterol niet of onvoldoende LDL-deeltjes kunnen binden, zodat minder LDL-cholesterol door de lever kan worden opgenomen en afgebroken.

Introduction: In the US, LDL-C levels and treatment patterns of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) – a group prioritized for statin therapy in the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines – remain poorly described. In 2013 the FH Foundation launched the CAscade SCreening for Awareness and DEtection (CASCADE) of FH Registry, the only active US FH patient registry addressing this knowledge gap. Methods: We conducted a 2-year (2013-2015) cross-sectional analysis among 1,295 adults with heterozygous FH enrolled in the CASCADE FH Registry from 10 US lipid clinics. Results: Mean (SD) age at enrollment was 54 (16) years; mean age at FH diagnosis was 45 (19) years; 59% were female; and 80% were white. Mean pretreatment and post-treatment LDL-C levels were 256 (66) and 156 (71) mg/dl, respectively. At enrollment, 43% of patients were taking high-intensity statin therapy; 25% were not taking a statin; and 45% received >1 LDL-lowering therapy. Among FH patients on LDL-lowering therapy, 25% achieved an LDL-C 1 LDL-lowering therapy (1.94, 1.29-2.93) (Figure). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was present in 37%, of whom 44% achieved a ≥50% LDL-C reduction and 9% achieved an LDL-C

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients require aggressive lipid lowering therapies to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. In the US, treatment patterns remain poorly described, and it remains unclear whether sex or ethnic/racial disparities exist. In 2013, the FH Foundation launched

Introduction. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder associated with a severely increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Although DNA test results in FH are associated with important medical and ethical consequences, data on accuracy of genetic tests is scarce.Methods. Therefore, we performed a prospective study to assess the overall accuracy of the DNA test used in the genetic cascade screening program for FH in The Netherlands. Individuals aged 18 years and older tested for one of the 5 most prevalent FH mutations, were included consecutively. DNA samples were analyzed by the reference and a counter-expertise laboratory following a standardized procedure.Results. 1003 cases were included. In the end, 317 (32%) carried an FH mutation, whereas in 686 (69%) samples no mutation was found. The overall accuracy of the reference laboratory was 99.8%, with two false positive results identified by the counter-expertise laboratory.Conclusion. The currently used mutation analysis is associated with a very low error rate. Therefore, we do not recommend routine use of duplicate testing.

Background— Screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) within affected families is often based on cutoff values for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, the diagnostic accuracy of LDL-C levels is influenced by the magnitude of the LDL-C overlap between FH patients and unaffected relatives. The purpose of the current study was to assess to what extent this overlap is influenced by the severity of specific FH mutations. Methods and Results— Individuals were eligible if they underwent family screening for FH between 2003 and 2010. The entire cohort was then compared with those who were investigated for the presence of the most severe mutations (class 1). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and the sensitivity of the 90th percentile of LDL-C were calculated for both cohorts. We included 26 406 individuals, of whom 9169 (35%) carried an FH-causing mutation. In the entire cohort at baseline, mean LDL-C was 4.63±1.44 mmol/L for FH carriers (n=5372) and 2.96±0.96 mmol/L for unaffected relatives (n=15 148); P Conclusions— In summary, the overlap in terms of LDL-C levels between those with molecularly proven FH and unaffected relatives is to a large extent because of the high prevalence of modestly severe LDL-receptor mutations in the Netherlands.

Objective To assess the follow-up of children diagnosed as having familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in the nationwide DNA-based cascade screening program (the Netherlands). Study design Questionnaires covering topics such as demographics, family history, physician consultation, and treatment were sent to parents of patients with FH (age 0-18 years), 18 months after diagnosis. Results We retrieved 207 questionnaires of patients aged 10.9 +/- 4.2 years (mean +/- SD) at diagnosis; 48% were boys, and the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at diagnosis was 167 +/- 51 mg/dL. Of these patients, 164 (79%) consulted a physician: a general practitioner (35%), lipid-clinic specialist (27%), pediatrician (21%), internist (11%), or another physician (6%). LDL-C level at diagnosis and a positive family history for cardiovascular disease were independent predictors for physician consultation. Of the patients who visited a physician, 62% reported to have received lifestyle advice, and 43 (26%) were prescribed statin treatment. Independent predictors for medication use were age, LDL-C level, and educational level of parents. Conclusion The follow-up of children with FH after diagnosis established through cascade screening is inadequate. Better education of patients, parents, and physicians, with a structured follow-up after screening, should improve control of LDL-C levels and hence cardiovascular risk in children with FH. (J Pediatr 2012; 161: 99-103)

Background People with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) may benefit from lifestyle changes supporting their primary treatment of dyslipidaemia. This project evaluated the efficacy of an individualised tailored lifestyle intervention on lipids (low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides), systolic blood pressure, glucose, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference in people with FH. Methods Adults with FH (n = 340), recruited from a Dutch cascade screening program, were randomly assigned to either a control group or an intervention group. The personalised intervention consisted of web-based tailored lifestyle advice and personal counselling. The control group received care as usual. Lipids, systolic blood pressure, glucose, BMI, and waist circumference were measured at baseline and after 12 months. Regression analyses were conducted to examine differences between both groups. Results After 12 months, no significant between-group differences of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk indicators were observed. LDL-C levels had decreased in both the intervention and control group. This difference between intervention and control group was not statistically significant. Conclusions This project suggests that an individually tailored lifestyle intervention did not have an additional effect in improving CVD risk indicators among people with FH. The cumulative effect of many small improvements in all indicators on long term CVD risk remains to be assessed in future studies. Trial registration NTR1899 at ww.trialregister.nl

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of an individualised tailored lifestyle intervention on physical activity, dietary intake, smoking and compliance to statin therapy in people with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH). Methods: Adults with FH (n = 340) were randomly assigned to a usual care control group or an intervention group. The intervention consisted of web-based tailored lifestyle advice and face-to-face counselling. Physical activity, fat, fruit and vegetable intake, smoking and compliance to statin therapy were self-reported at baseline and after 12 months. Regression analyses were conducted to examine between-group differences. Intervention reach, dose and fidelity were assessed. Results: In both groups, non-significant improvements in all lifestyle behaviours were found. Post-hoc analyses showed a significant decrease in saturated fat intake among women in the intervention group (β = -1.03; CI -1.98/-0.03). In the intervention group, 95% received a log on account, of which 49% logged on and completed one module. Nearly all participants received face-to-face counselling and on average, 4.2 telephone booster calls. Intervention fidelity was low. Conclusions: Individually tailored feedback is not superior to no intervention regarding changes in multiple lifestyle behaviours in people with FH. A higher received dose of computer-tailored interventions should be achieved by uplifting the website and reducing the burden of screening questionnaires. Counsellor training should be more extensive. Trial Registration: Dutch Trial Register NTR1899. © 2012 Broekhuizen et al.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, a screening programme was set up in 1994 in order to identify all patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). After 15 years of screening, we evaluated the geographical distribution, possible founder effects and clinical phenotype of the 12 most prevalent FH gene mutations. METHODS: Patients who carried one of the 12 most prevalent mutations, index cases and those identified between 1994 and 2009 through the screening programme and whose postal code was known were included in the study. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at the time of screening were retrieved. The prevalence of identified FH patients in each postal code area was calculated and visualised in different maps. RESULTS: A total of 10,889 patients were included in the study. Mean untreated LDL-C levels ranged from 4.4 to 6.4 mmol/l. For almost all mutations, a region of high prevalence could be observed. In total, 51 homozygous patients were identified in the Netherlands, of which 13 true homozygous for one of the 12 most prevalent mutations. The majority of them were living in high-prevalence areas for that specific mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes with regard to LDL-C levels varied between the 12 most prevalent FH mutations. For most of these mutations, a founder effect was observed. Our observations can have implications with regard to the efficiency of molecular screening and physician's perception of FH and to the understanding of the prevalence and distribution of homozygous patients in the Netherlands.

Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have elevated LDL-C levels, usually above the 90th percentile (P90) for age and gender. However, large-scale genetic cascade screening for FH showed that 15% of the LDL-receptor (LDLR) or Apolipoprotein B (APOB) mutation carriers have LDL-C levels below P75. Nonpathogenicity of sequence changes may explain this phenomenon. To assess pathogenicity of a mutation we proposed three criteria: (1) mean LDL-C > P75 in untreated mutation carriers; (2) higher mean LDL-C level in untreated carriers than in untreated noncarriers; and (3) higher percentage of medication users in carriers than in noncarriers at screening. We considered a mutation nonpathogenic when none of the three criteria were met. We applied these criteria to mutations that had been determined in more than 50 untreated adults. Segregation analysis was performed to confirm nonpathogenicity. Forty-six mutations had been tested in more than 50 untreated subjects, and three were nonpathogenic according to our criteria: one in LDLR (c.108C > A, exon 2) and two in APOB (c.13154T > C and c.13181T > C, both in exon 29). Segregation analysis also indicated nonpathogenicity. According to our criteria, three sequence variants were nonpathogenic. The criteria may help to identify nonpathogenic sequence changes in genetic cascade screening programs. Hum Mutat 31:752-760, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc

BackgroundThe risk of premature cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) can be profoundly reduced by cholesterol-lowering therapy, and current guidelines for FH advocate ambitious low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In the present study, we determined whether these goals are reflected in current clinical practice once FH has been diagnosed.Methodology/principal findingsIn 2008, we sent questionnaires to all subjects (aged 18-65 years) who were molecularly diagnosed with FH in the year 2006 through the screening program in The Netherlands. Of these 1062 subjects, 781 completed the questionnaire (46% males; mean age: 42+/-12 years; mean LDL-C at molecular diagnosis (baseline): 4.1+/-1.3 mmol/L). The number of persons that used cholesterol-lowering therapy increased from 397 (51%) at baseline to 636 (81%) after diagnosis. Mean treated LDL-C levels decreased significantly to 3.2+/-1.1 mmol/L two years after diagnosis. Only 22% achieved the LDL-C target level of < or = 2.5 mmol/L.Conclusions/significanceThe proportion of patients using cholesterol-lowering medication was significantly increased after FH diagnosis through genetic cascade screening. The attained LDL-C levels were lower than those reported in previous surveys on medication use in FH, which could reflect the effect of more stringent lipid target levels. However, only a minority of the medication users reached the LDL-C target.

Perceived risk and representations of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and preventive behaviour of people diagnosed with Familial Hypercholesterolemia by DNA testing ( N = 81) were assessed. In general, participants perceived their own CVD risk as being relatively low. While participants reported almost optimal medication adherence (99%), only 49 per cent reported following recommendations concerning diet and physical activity. Family history of CVD was associated with both risk perception and the adoption of a healthy lifestyle. In their communications with FH-screened positives, health professionals should be aware that people may underestimate CVD risk, and should stress how behaviour change can reduce the risk.

common genetic disease that leads to substantially elevated levels of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)  The 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines for treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce ASCVD risk in adults denote an LDL-C level > 190 mg/dL (suggestive of FH) as an independent high-risk feature.  Individuals with FH have a 20-fold increase in risk of early cardiovascular disease.  Despite its prevalence, FH remains largely underrecognized: an estimated 1.5 million individuals in the U.S. have FH, yet fewer than 10% have been formally diagnosed.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a hereditary condition caused by various genetic mutations that lead to significantly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and resulting in a 20-fold increased lifetime risk for premature cardiovascular disease. Although its prevalence in the United States is 1 in 300 to 500 individuals,10% of FH patients are formally diagnosed, and many are not appropriately treated. Contemporary data are needed to more fully characterize FH disease prevalence, treatment strategies, and patient experiences in the United States.The Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation (a patient-led nonprofit organization) has established the CAscade SCreening for Awareness and DEtection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (CASCADE FH) Registry as a national, multicenter initiative to identify US FH patients, track their treatment, and clinical and patient-reported outcomes over time. The CASCADE FH will use multiple enrollment strategies to maximize identification of FH patients. Electronic health record screening of health care systems will provide an efficient mechanism to identify undiagnosed patients. A group of specialized lipid clinics will enter baseline and annual follow-up data on demographics, laboratory values, treatment, and clinical events. Patients meeting prespecified low-density lipoprotein or total cholesterol criteria suspicious for FH will have the opportunity to self-enroll in an online patient portal with information collected directly from patients semiannually. Registry patients will be provided information on cascade screening and will complete an online pedigree to assist with notification of family members.The Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation CASCADE FH Registry represents a novel research paradigm to address gaps in knowledge and barriers to comprehensive FH screening, identification, and treatment.

Background Some recently emerged lipid-lowering therapies are currently restricted to patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), and studies are underway to also assess these therapies in patients with ‘severe heterozygous FH (HeFH)'. However, no uniform definition of ‘severe HeFH' exists, although untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels above 8 mmol/L (309 mg/dl) have been historically used to define this phenotype. Our aim was to define severe HeFH, to establish its prevalence and CVD risk, and to study the relative contribution of classical risk factors to CVD risk in HeFH patients. Methods and results We analysed a cohort of 14,283 patients with molecularly defined HeFH, identified by the national FH screening programme in the Netherlands. Age and gender specific percentiles of untreated LDL-C were determined. The percentile corresponding to an LDL-C level of 8 mmol/L (309 mg/dL) in men aged 36–40 years (90 th percentile) was selected as the cut-off value for severe HeFH. By applying this percentile-criterion to the whole cohort, 11% of the HeFH patients could be considered as having severe HeFH. Combined with an estimated HeFH prevalence of 1:300 in the Netherlands, this would translate into a prevalence of approximately 1:3,000 for severe HeFH. CVD risk was significantly increased in severe HeFH patients compared to non-severe HeFH patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.05–1.51], p = 0.015). In line, male gender, increased age, increased BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, high LDL-C and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were independent CVD risk factors in HeFH per se. Conclusions We changed the commonly used static LDL-C level of 8 mmol/L for the identification of severe HeFH into an age and gender corrected percentile. This definition would theoretically result in a prevalence of 1:3,000 for severe HeFH. Patients with severe HeFH are at increased CVD risk compared to non-severe HeFH patients, which underscores the need for more aggressive LDL-C lowering these patients.

It has been reported that women with an inherited deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S have an increased risk for developing venous thromboembolic disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period. However, because the available data on risk are flawed, it is difficult to define a rational, efficacious, and safe policy about prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in these women. To determine the frequency of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period in women with heritable deficiencies of anticoagulant factors. Retrospective cohort study. University outpatient clinics in the Netherlands and Italy. 129 otherwise asymptomatic female family members of patients with a history of venous thromboembolism and an established deficiency of antithrombin, protein C, or protein S. Medical history, with specific attention to episodes of venous thromboembolism and obstetric history, was taken. The anticoagulant factor status of the study participants was determined. If a patient had an episode of venous thromboembolism, subsequent pregnancies in that patient were not analyzed. Of the 129 women who participated in the study, 60 had anticoagulant factor deficiency and 69 did not. In the nondeficient group, 198 pregnancies occurred; 1 of these (0.5%) was complicated by an episode of venous thromboembolism during the postpartum period. In the deficient group, 169 pregnancies occurred; 7 of these (4.1%) were complicated by an episode of venous thromboembolism during the third trimester of pregnancy (2 pregnancies [1.2%]) and the postpartum period (5 pregnancies [3.0%]). The risk for venous thromboembolism was increased eightfold in deficient women compared with nondeficient women (hazard ratio, 8.0 [95% CI 1.2 to 184]). Anticoagulant factor-deficient women have an increased risk for venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Although data from an appropriate randomized clinical trial are lacking, the frequency of venous thromboembolism seen in deficient women might justify the use of anticoagulative prophylaxis during the third trimester of pregnancy and the postpartum period