Search

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous enoxaparin as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH) as antithrombotic therapy in unselected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results: Eight hundred and seventy-six (876) consecutive eligible patients undergoing PCI were prospectively randomised to either intravenous enoxaparin 0.75 mg/kg or dose-adjusted UFH in this open-label study that was prematurely stopped due to slow recruitment. Randomisation was stratified on elective PCI or PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The primary endpoint was a combination of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned target vessel revascularisation and major bleeding at 30 days. Secondary endpoint was a composite of major and minor bleeding and thrombocytopenia < 50x109. The primary endpoint of intravenous enoxaparin did not differ from those of UFH (5.5% vs. 7.0%, p=ns) whereas safety endpoints were reduced with enoxaparin compared to UFH (9.9% vs. 20.0%, p

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most effective reperfusion modality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Data concerning long-term survival and functional outcome are sparse.One thousand consecutive patients treated by emergency PCI were systematically ana-lysed in a single-centre registry. Multivariate predictors of in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and late functional capacity were identified.Follow-up was completed for 978 patients. The median clinical follow-up length was 3.2 years. In-hospital and post-discharge mortality were 7.6% and 7.3%, respectively. Annualised post-discharge mortality remained stable over time at 2% per year. Independent predictors of in-hospital death were cardiogenic shock, TIMI flow3 after PCI, left ventricular ejection fraction40%, age and time to patent artery6 h. Independent predictors of post-discharge mortality were TIMI flow after PCI3, prior MI, elevated glucose levels at admission, and increasing age. In contrast, cardiogenic shock, time to patent artery and left ventricular ejection fraction40% were not independently associated with post-hospital death. At late follow-up, 47% of patients had normal functional capacity and 49.1% were in New York Heart Association functional class II. Predictors of impaired functional capacity at follow-up were age, gender, smoking habits and multivessel coronary disease.Post-discharge mortality after PCI for acute MI was 2% per year. Significant differences exist between predictors of in-hospital and post-discharge mortality. The functional capacity of surviving patients was remarkably good, even when presented in cardiogenic shock.

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), increased plasma glucose levels at hospital admission are associated with worse outcome. We aimed to assess the predictive value of admission glucose concentrations on short- and long-term mortality in patients with acute MI undergoing primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).We analyzed the 30-day and long-term (mean follow-up 3.7 years) outcome of 978 patients prospectively included in a single-center registry of patients with acute MI treated with PCI within 24 hours after onset of symptoms. Patients were classified according to plasma glucose levels at admission:7.8 mmol/L (group I, n = 322), 7.8 to 11 mmol/L (group II, n = 348), and11.0 mmol/L (group III, n = 308).Mortality at 30 days was 1.2% in group I, 6.3% in group II, and 16.6% in group III (P.001). After multivariate adjustment for age, the presence of cardiogenic shock, and TIMI 3 flow after PCI, the association of mortality with glucose classification remained significant (P value for trend = .003). The relative risk of death at 30 days for group III versus group I was 3.9 (95% CI 1.2-13.2). During long-term follow-up, mortality was similar in groups I and II. However, in group III adjusted mortality remained significantly increased compared with group I (relative risk 1.76, CI 1.01-3.08).In patients undergoing emergency PCI for acute MI, glucose levels at hospital admission are predictive for short- and long-term survival. Knowledge of admission glucose levels may improve initial bedside risk stratification.