Search

Abstract Background Possible immunization to blood group or other antigens and subsequent inhibition of remodeling or incorporation after use of untreated human bone allograft was described previously. This study presents the immunological, clinical and radiological results of 30 patients with acetabular revisions using fresh frozen non-irradiated bone allograft. Methods AB0-incompatible (donor-recipient) bone transplantation was performed in 22 cases, Rh(D) incompatible transplantation in 6 cases. The mean follow up of 23 months included measuring Harris hip score and radiological examination with evaluation of remodeling of the bone graft, implant migration and heterotopic ossification. In addition, all patients were screened for alloimmunization to Rh blood group antigens. Results Compared to the whole study group, there were no differences in clinical or radiological measurements for the groups with AB0- or Rh(D)-incompatible bone transplantation. The mean Harris Hip Score was 80.6. X-rays confirmed total remodeling of all allografts with no acetabular loosening. At follow up, blood tests revealed no alloimmunization to Rh blood group donor antigens. Conclusions The use of fresh frozen non-irradiated bone allograft in acetabular revision is a reliable supplement to reconstruction. The risk of alloimmunization to donor-blood group antigens after AB0- or Rh-incompatible allograft transplantation with a negative long-term influence on bone-remodeling or the clinical outcome is negligible.

Abstract Background Most modern spinal implants contain titanium and remain in the patient’s body permanently. Local and systemic effects such as tissue necrosis, osteolysis and malignant cell transformation caused by implants have been described. Increasing tissue concentration and whole blood levels of ions are necessary before a disease caused by a contaminant develops. The aim of the present study was the measurement of whole blood titanium levels and the evaluation of a possible correlation between these changes and the number of fused segments. Methods A prospective study was designed to determine changes in whole blood titanium levels after spinal fusion and to analyze the correlation to the number of pedicle screws, cross connectors and interbody devices implanted. Blood samples were taken preoperatively in group I (n = 15), on the first, second and 10th day postoperatively, as well as 3 and 12 months after surgery. Group II (n = 16) served as a control group of volunteers who did not have any metal implants in the body. Blood samples were taken once in this group. The number of screw-rod-connections and the length of the spinal fusion were determined using radiographic pictures. This study was checked and approved by the ethical committee of the University of Tuebingen. Results The mean age in group I was 47 ± 22 years (range 16 - 85 years). There were three male (20%) and twelve female (80%) patients. The median number of fused segments was 5 (range 1 to 11 segments). No statistically significant increase in the titanium level was seen 12 months after surgery (mean difference: -7.2 μg/l, 95% CI: -26.9 to 12.5 μg/l, p = 0.446). By observing the individual titanium levels, 4 out of 15 patients demonstrated an increase in titanium levels 12 months after surgery. No statistically significant correlation between fused segments (r = -0.188, p = 0.503) length of instrumentation (r = -0.329, p = 0.231), number of interbody devices (r = -0.202, p = 0.291) and increase of titanium levels over the observation period was seen. Conclusions Instrumented spinal fusion does not lead to a statistically significant increase in whole blood titanium levels. There seems to be no correlation between the number of pedicle screws, cross connectors and interbody devices implanted and the increase of serum titanium levels.

Abstract Background Stiffness with decreased range of motion (ROM) has been described as a frustrating complication after TKA. If all methods of physiotherapeutic treatment have been exhausted trying to develop ROM, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) can be discussed. The aim of the present study was to show the effect of MUA and to determine the influence of BMI, number of previous surgical procedures, pre-MUA ROM and timing of MUA for the results after MUA in regard to absolute flexion and gain in flexion. Methods 858 patients underwent TKA at our institution between 2004 and 2009. 39 of these patients underwent MUA because of postoperative knee stiffness. The data were retrospective analysed for the influence of BMI, pre-MUA flexion (/≤ 30 days after TKA) and number of previous surgery on the results after MUA (absolute Flexion/gain in flexion). Results The prevalence for stiffness after TKA was 4.54%. There was a statistically significant improvement in flexion not only directly after MUA but also 6 weeks after MUA. Patients with two or more previous operations before TKA showed statistically significant worse results six weeks after MUA in absolute flexion and gain in flexion (p = 0.039) than patients with one or two previous operations. No statistical significance in absolute flexion (p = 0.655) and gain in flexion (p = 0.328) after MUA between "early" and "late" was detected. The stiffer knees with a flexion below 70° showed significantly worse results (p = 0.044) in absolute flexion six weeks after MUA, but they also had statistical statistically better results with regard to gain in flexion (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion MUA is a good instrument for improving ROM after TKA. The time between TKA and MUA seems less important, so different types of physiotherapeutic treatment could be tried before the procedure is started. MUA in patients with many previous operations and a flexion of less than 70° before MUA is not as effective as in other patients, but they also benefit from MUA.

Introduction: The modified Broström operation (MBO) has found widespread use in the therapy of lateral chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, alternative surgical techniques like the open reconstruction using a periosteal flap (RPF) are still an important part of the surgical treatment of lateral CAI. Both procedures differ in terms of the reconstruction material used and the surgical procedure. Comparative studies on the surgical therapy of CAI are limited and generally refer to similar surgical procedures. Aim of this study was to compare the arthroscopic MBO and the RPF., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed 25 patients with lateral CAI after a tear of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL). 14 patients received arthroscopic MBO and 11 patients received RPF. We compared the postoperative outcome between both groups with respect to subjective instability, the number of ankle sprains, pain, complications and follow-up operations as well as the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score., Results: Both surgical procedures resulted in a significant improvement in pain, in subjective instability, in the reduction in the frequency of ankle sprains and improvement in the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score one year postoperatively. Three months postoperatively, the values for pain and instability of the MBO group were significantly better compared to the RPF. One year after the operation, these differences were evened out. Also in terms of complications and follow-up operations, no significant difference was found between the two procedures., Conclusions: Both surgical procedures give very good results one year postoperatively in terms of pain, instability, function and complication rate. With significantly better results regarding pain and instability three months postoperatively, the MBO allows a faster recovery in patients operated with this technique., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate a simple tool for daily practice that might allow a rough estimate of individual braking performance (brake response time, BRT) of patients with osteoarthritis or those with arthroplasty of the knee or hip., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we examined 162 patients (72 men, 90 women; mean age = 64±12.8 years) who suffered from osteoarthritis of the knee (n=45) or hip (n=64) or who underwent a total hip (n=37) or knee (n=16) arthroplasty. BRT of each patient was measured in a brake simulator. The results were compared to demographic data, various clinical tests, and pain surveys. From these data, a multiple linear regression model was developed., Results: From the observed correlations, the regression model consisted of age (correlation with BRT τ=0.176, p=0.001), sex (τ=0.361, p<0.001), Hau's step test (τ=-0.345, p<0.001), and the pain dimension of the Hip disability/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (τ=-0.265, p<0.001). We, therefore, suggested the following formula: BRTest = 634.8 - (8.8 x Hau) + 119.2 (for women) + (3.0 x age) - (1.3 x H/KOOS Pain). The above-mentioned variables contributed significantly to the prediction of BRT and could achieve a multiple R² adj of 0.31. The model leaves a residual standard error (i.e., SD of the residuals) of 158.4 ms, which is superior to a model without predictors; F (4.140)=16.8, p<0.001., Conclusion: Our evaluated regression model offers an uncertainty which is comparable to the one based on a fixed time period after surgery or a defined pathologic condition. The high variability even within a single patient over several brake simulator measurements makes it unlikely for a model to be generated solely based on clinical testing. Taking the available data in literature into account, we advise caution when formulating a real-time- or condition-based recommendation. We rather suggest being aware of risk factors that might lead to impaired BRT to sensitize patients to their impaired ability to drive. We identify such risk factors, namely old age, female sex, impaired musculoskeletal function, as tested in Hau's step test, and high levels of pain., Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Objective: To investigate if testing in a brake simulator can be replaced by a simple reaction timer setup imitating the ergonomic conditions of emergency braking when evaluating the ability to drive in patients with musculoskeletal problems of the lower extremities., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery in our University Hospital from October 2014 until May 2015. Patients attending our department with either osteoarthritis or arthroplasty of the knee or hip were asked to participate in the study if they had a valid driving license. The age limit was from 18 to 85 years. Both women and men were included. Registered demographic data were patient age, height, sex, body weight, and body mass index. Braking performance (brake response time [BRT]) was evaluated in a brake simulator that was embedded into a real car cabin (10 measurements). The values obtained were compared with those registered when simply testing (5 measurements) those patients with a normal reaction timer setup that imitated the sitting position in a car. Kendall's tau correlation coefficient was calculated between the values obtained from the brake simulator with those from the reaction timer setup., Results: Altogether, 137 patients (median age 67 years [range, 24-89 years]) with either osteoarthritis of the knee (n = 55) or hip (n = 82) were tested. Age was comparable in both collectives (P = 0.807). The mean body height was 1.70 m in both groups. Knee patients presented with a higher body weight of approximately 5 kg (P = 0.014) and consequently also had a higher body mass index (P = 0.023). The median BRT in the brake simulator was 628 ms (range, 390-1444 ms) for all subjects: 592 ms (range, 418-1146 ms) in the hip group and 696 ms (range, 390-1444 ms) in the knee group. Measurement values obtained by the reaction timer were significantly (P < 0.001) higher by approximately 15% (SD, 22%) than those measured in the brake simulator. A moderate correlation was found between the reaction timer and the brake simulator, with a Kendall's tau of 0.449 (P < 0.001) for all patients. Interestingly, hip patients showed a higher correlation (τ = 0.471) than knee patients (τ = 0.263)., Conclusion: Even though the measured correlations do not allow us to make a definite statement concerning braking performance, especially in knee patients, a simple reaction timer test can provide a low-cost first estimate of BRT for patients and their treating physicians. For forensic statements, the brake simulator will, however, remain the gold standard., (© 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Spinal surgeries have strongly increased in number over the past decade. The question of when it is safe to resume driving is thereby one the most frequently asked questions that patients ask of their treating physician., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess braking performance before and after spine surgery., Methods: Reaction time, foot transfer time (together brake response time [BRT]), and brake force (BF) were evaluated in a drive simulator. A longitudinal patient cohort (n= 27) was tested preoperatively and at the first follow-up. A cross-sectional cohort (n= 27) was tested at > 1 year postoperatively. The values from these groups were compared with a healthy age-matched control group of 24 volunteers., Results: No significant improvement in BRT was seen in lumbar fusion three months postoperatively (p= 0.597); BF was even weaker than it was preoperatively (p= 0.044). In comparison to the control group (median BRT 479 ms), preoperative BRT was already impaired in lumbar fusion patients (median 560 ms), representing an increased braking distance of 2.25 m at 100 km/h., Conclusion: Although most patients performed adequately, about one third presented critical braking performance. Risk factors for impaired braking may include scheduled multisegmental fusion surgery, female sex, and pain.