Search

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to perform a retrospective cohort analysis, in which we measured the association of an acute pain service (APS)-driven multimodal analgesia protocol that included preoperative intrathecal morphine (ITM) compared to historic controls (i.e., surgeon-driven analgesia protocol without ITM) with postoperative opioid use. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which the primary objective was to determine whether there was a decrease in median 24-h opioid consumption (intravenous morphine equivalents [MEQ]) among robotic nephrectomy patients whose pain was managed by the surgical team prior to the APS, versus pain managed by APS. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption during the 24-48 h and 48-72 h period and hospital length of stay. To create matched cohorts, we performed 1:1 (APS:non-APS) propensity score matching. Due to the cohorts occurring at the different time periods, we performed a segmented regression analysis of an interrupted time series. RESULTS: There were 76 patients in the propensity-matched cohorts, in which 38 (50.0%) were in the APS cohort. The median difference in 24-h opioid consumption in the pre-APS versus APS cohort was 23.0 mg [95% CI 15.0, 31.0] (p

Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia. We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1–100 μg; 101–200 μg; 201–500 μg; >500 μg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified. Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29–1.79), P <0.0001; 6.11 (5.25–7.10), P <0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17–2.56), P =0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system). Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner. PROSPERO (CRD42023387838). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) methadone versus intrathecal morphine (ITM) within an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) pathway on postoperative pain and outcomes (length of hospital stay and postoperative complications) after cardiac surgery. Retrospective cohort study. Two tertiary academic medical institutions within the same health system. Eligible 289 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with an enhanced recovery pathway from January 2020 through July 2021. Patients were administered ITM (0.25 mg) or IV methadone (0.1 mg/kg) if ITM was contraindicated. All patients were enrolled in an ERACS pathway using current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery society guidelines. Primary outcome measures included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption measured as oral morphine equivalents. We analyzed patient demographics, procedural factors, intraoperative medications, and outcomes. Adjusted linear mixed models were fit to analyze associations between intervention and pain outcomes. ITM was associated with decrease in pain scores on postoperative day 0 after adjusting for clinical variables (average marginal effect, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.977; p = 0.049). No difference in opioid consumption could be demonstrated between groups after adjusting for postoperative day and other variables of interest. ITM when compared with IV methadone was associated with a decrease in pain scores without any difference in opioid consumption after elective cardiac surgery. Methadone can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to ITM for ERACS protocols. Future large prospective studies are needed to validate this finding and further improve analgesia and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. Methods: We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. Results: We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block.

Background: Nalbuphine, a synthetic k-agonist and µ-antagonist, provides efficient pain relief while reducing opioid-related adverse effects. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) with intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-TKA pain. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 131 patients who underwent TKA with spinal anesthesia (SA), a single shot of adductor canal block, and periarticular injections was conducted. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group N received 0.8 mg nalbuphine, and Group M received 0.2 mg morphine as an adjuvant to SA. Propensity-score matching was employed to compare the visual analog scales (VAS) of postoperative pain intensity, cumulative morphine use (CMU), maximum knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR) ability, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and length of hospital stay (LHS). Results: The mean VAS of group M were significantly lower than group N at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h (P < 0.01). Group M had lower CMU than group N at 24 h (P < 0.01) and 48 h (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between groups in terms of knee flexion angle and SLR at any time point. Additionally, 29.3 and 57.9% of patients in group N and M experienced PONV, respectively (p = 0.04), and group N had significantly shorter LHS compared to group M (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Although, intrathecal morphine (ITM) still provides better pain control particularly in the first 24 h, patients who received intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) had significantly fewer incidence of PONV, and shorter LHS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pain after open urological procedures is often intense. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of intrathecal morphine with systemic analgesia approaches. Prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled study. Patients undergoing open prostatectomy or nephrectomy were randomly divided into the intervention group or the control group. Patients in the intervention group received morphine 250 mcg in 2.5 mL saline intrathecally. Anesthesia was identical in both groups. All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) postoperative and received paracetamol 1 g intravenously every 6 hours and diclofenac 75 mg intramuscularly every 12 hours. If postoperative pain exceeded four on the numeric rating scale, morphine 10 mg was administered subcutaneously. Pain intensity, time to first dose of morphine, morphine doses, and side effects were recorded. In total, 41 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 57 to the control group. The time to administration of the first dose of morphine was significantly (P <.001) longer in the intervention group when compared to controls. This observation was also noted individually for patients undergoing nephrectomy (36.86 hours vs 4.06 hours) and prostatectomy (33.13 hours vs 4.5 hours). Many patients did not need opioids after surgery in the intervention group (nephrectomy 72% vs 3%, prostatectomy 75% vs 4.5%, P <.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects. The results of our study confirmed that preoperative intrathecal morphine provides long-lasting analgesia and reduces the need for postoperative systemic administration of opioids. Adverse effects are minor and comparable between groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) or erector spinae plane (ESP) block reduces postsurgical pain in patients who underwent kidney transplantation surgeries. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of both modalities in terms of duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with postoperative fentanyl consumption. Methods: We conducted a randomised study and analysed 60 patients posted for elective live-related kidney transplantation surgery. They were randomised into two groups. Group M patients received ITM, whereas Group E patients received ESP block. We standardised the postoperative analgesia for both groups with intravenous fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was to compare the quality of analgesia using the numerical rating scale score between the groups. The secondary outcome was to observe the effect of both modalities on the duration of analgesia, postoperative fentanyl consumption, rescue analgesics requirement, catheter-related bladder discomfort and any complications. Results: We found significantly lower pain scores at rest and while coughing in Group M at all time intervals, except at 24 h while coughing. The mean time to first analgesia requirement was significantly longer in Group M than in Group E (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in postoperative consumption of total fentanyl (P = 0.065) and rescue analgesia in both groups. In Group M, there was significantly more nausea, vomiting and pruritus (P = 0.001). Conclusions: ITM provides long-lasting postoperative analgesia at the cost of higher side effects than ESP block. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods: This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results: The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p=0.395). Conclusion: Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Purpose The addition of intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is an effective method of providing analgesia. However, the analgesia duration of approximately 24 hours poses the risk of rebound pain on the second postoperative day. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the patients' perception on postoperative pain management using the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire on both the first and second postoperative day. Methods This prospective single-center cohort study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2021 and included forty patients. The primary outcome was a difference in postoperative pain on the first and second postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, interference of pain with activities, side effects, and patients’ perception and satisfaction with pain treatment. Results The intensity of postoperative pain did not increase on the second postoperative day NRS [numeric rating scale] 5 (2–7 [0–10]) vs 5 (3–7 [1–10]), p=0.414), but the percentage of time spent in severe pain increased (20% (10-40 [0-90]) vs 30% (20-50 [0-80]), p=0.010). There was no difference in opioid consumption (6 mg (0–12) [0–42] vs 6 mg (0–12) [0–29], p=0.914). Pruritis (NRS 2 (0–6 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–3 [0–8]), p=0.001) and dizziness (NRS 2 (0–7 [0–10]) vs 0 (0–2 [0–9]), p=0.002) decreased on the second postoperative day. Patients reported high satisfaction during the first two days after surgery (NRS 8 (7–9) [0–10] vs 8 (7–9) [0–10], p=0.395). Conclusion Intrathecal morphine is a suitable analgesic modality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program, without causing important rebound pain. Pain scores, however, may be further reduced by adding non-opioid analgesics.

Over many decades, spinal (intrathecal) opioid administration has become a proven method of analgesia for the perioperative period. However, in clinical practice, it is confronted with concerns about potential complications, the need for increased postoperative monitoring, and the unavailability of a relevant commercial product on the Czech market. Pathophysiological interpretation of adverse effects and their potential prevention is evolving as research continues. The implementation of spinal opioids in clinical practice is likewise changing. When used appropriately, it is a safe method to improve the postoperative course of the full spectrum of surgical procedures across age groups. Thus, healthcare facilities with individually prepared morphine for intrathecal administration can enjoy the benefits of not only quality patient analgesia but also the minimization of peripheral adverse effects of opioids. This article aims to highlight new findings on the use of spinal morphine. It also focuses on the preventability of its adverse effects and the specifics of its use in the elderly population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Lung resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) improves surgical accuracy and postoperative recovery. Unfortunately, moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain is still inherent to the procedure, and a technique of choice has not been established for the appropriate control of pain. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal morphine (ITM) with that of intercostal levobupivacaine (ICL). Methods: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, controlled trial among 181 adult patients undergoing VATS (ISRCTN12771155). Participants were randomized to receive ITM or ICL. Primary outcomes were the intensity of pain, assessed by a numeric rating scale (NRS) over the first 48 h after surgery, and the amount of intravenous morphine used. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse effects, length of hospital stay, mortality, and chronic post-surgical pain at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results: There are no statistically significant differences between ITM and ICL groups in pain intensity and evolution at rest. In cough-related pain, differences in pain trajectories over time are observed. Upon admission to the PACU, cough-related pain was higher in the ITM group, but the trend reversed after 6 h. There are no significant differences in adverse effects. The rate of chronic pain was low and did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: ITM can be considered an adequate and satisfactory regional technique for the control of acute postoperative pain in VATS, compatible with the multimodal rehabilitation and early discharge protocols used in these types of surgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac surgeries often result in significant postoperative pain, leading to considerable use of opioids for pain management. However, excessive opioid use can lead to undesirable side effects and chronic opioid use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether preoperative intrathecal morphine could reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Studies that evaluated intrathecal administration of other opioids or combinations of medications were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation and hospital length of stay. The final analysis included ten randomized controlled trials, with a total of 402 patients. The results showed that postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly lower in the intervention group (standardized mean difference -1.43 [-2.12, -0.74], 95% CI, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in time to extubation and hospital length of stay. Our meta-analysis concluded that preoperative intrathecal morphine is associated with lower postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h following cardiac surgeries, without prolonging the time to extubation. The use of preoperative intrathecal morphine can be considered part of a multimodal analgesic and opioid-sparing strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Abstract Background Thoracoscopic surgical techniques continue to advance, yet the intensity of postoperative pain remains significant, impeding swift patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in postoperative pain and recuperation between patients receiving intrathecal morphine paired with low-dose bupivacaine and those administered general anesthesia exclusively. Methods This randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients, who were allocated into three groups: Group M (5 μg/kg morphine intrathecal injection), Group B (5 μg/kg morphine combined with bupivacaine 3 mg intrathecal injection) and Group C (intrathecal sham injection). The primary outcome was the assessment of pain relief using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, intraoperative remifentanil consumption was quantified at the end of the surgery, and postoperative opioid use was determined by the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) compressions at 48 h post-surgery. Both the efficacy of the treatments and any complications were meticulously recorded. Results Postoperative NRS scores for both rest and exercise at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in groups M and B than in group C (P0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative propofol dosage across all three groups (P>0.05). Postoperative dosages of both sufentanil and Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were significantly less in groups M and B compared to group C (P

Despite the potential benefits of intrathecal morphine (ITM), the precise role and dosing of ITM in robotic assisted surgery (RAS) remains unclear. This systematic review explores real-world evidence to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of ITM in patients undergoing RAS. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and APA PsycInfo. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on exertion at 24- and 48-h time intervals, and secondary outcomes aimed to explore the side effects of ITM. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine mean differences. A risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A total of 9 RCTs involving 619 patients were included in this review, of which 298 patients were administered ITM. Significant pain score reductions were observed both at rest (MD = −27.15; 95% CI [−43.97, −10.33]; I2 = 95%; p = 0.002) and on exertion (MD = −25.88; 95% CI [−37.03, −14.72]; I2 = 79%; p = 0.0003) 24 h postoperatively in the ITM groups, accompanied by a notable decrease in postoperative IV morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h (MD = −20.13; 95% CI [−30.74, −9.52]; I2 = 77%; p = 0.0002). ITM improved pain scores both at rest and on exertion at 24 and 48 h intervals, concurrently reducing the need for postoperative opioid consumption, but at the cost of an increased incidence of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac surgeries often result in significant postoperative pain, leading to considerable use of opioids for pain management. However, excessive opioid use can lead to undesirable side effects and chronic opioid use. This systematic review and meta‑analysis aimed to evaluate whether preoperative intrathecal morphine could reduce postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring sternotomy. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Studies that evaluated intrathecal administration of other opioids or combinations of medications were excluded. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation and hospital length of stay. The final analysis included ten randomized controlled trials, with a total of 402 patients. The results showed that postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h was significantly lower in the intervention group (standardized mean difference ‑1.43 [‑2.12, ‑0.74], 95% CI, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in time to extubation and hospital length of stay. Our meta‑analysis concluded that preoperative intrathecal morphine is associated with lower postoperative morphine consumption at 24 h following cardiac surgeries, without prolonging the time to extubation. The use of preoperative intrathecal morphine can be considered part of a multimodal analgesic and opioid‑sparing strategy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracoscopic surgical techniques continue to advance, yet the intensity of postoperative pain remains significant, impeding swift patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in postoperative pain and recuperation between patients receiving intrathecal morphine paired with low-dose bupivacaine and those administered general anesthesia exclusively. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 100 patients, who were allocated into three groups: Group M (5 μg/kg morphine intrathecal injection), Group B (5 μg/kg morphine combined with bupivacaine 3 mg intrathecal injection) and Group C (intrathecal sham injection). The primary outcome was the assessment of pain relief using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, intraoperative remifentanil consumption was quantified at the end of the surgery, and postoperative opioid use was determined by the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) compressions at 48 h post-surgery. Both the efficacy of the treatments and any complications were meticulously recorded. Results: Postoperative NRS scores for both rest and exercise at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). The intraoperative remifentanil dosage was significantly greater in groups M and C than in group B (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between groups M and C (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative propofol dosage across all three groups (P>0.05). Postoperative dosages of both sufentanil and Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were significantly less in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). The time of first analgesic request was later in both groups M and B than in group C (P<0.05). Specific and total scores were elevated at 2 days postoperative when compared to scores at 1 day for all groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 1 day and 2 days postoperatively, both specific scores and total scores were higher in groups M and B compared to group C (P<0.05). Conclusion: Intrathecal administration of morphine combined with bupivacaine has been shown to effectively ameliorate acute pain in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Trial registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: ChiCTR2200058544, registered 10/04/2022. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been widely effective in improving postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing a multitude of surgeries, including lumbar spine fusion. A major limitation of ITM administration is the increase in the incidence of respiratory depression in a dose-dependent manner. One way to bypass this is to use a more potent opioid with a shorter half-life, such as fentanyl. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent one- or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. The patients received one of two interventions: 0.2mg intrathecal duramorph/morphine (ITM group; n=70), 0.2mg duramorph + 50 mcg fentanyl (ITM + fentanyl group; n=68) and the control group (n=102). Primary outcomes included postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale) and opioid intake (MED – morphine equivalent dosage, mg) for postoperative days (POD) 1- 4. Secondary outcomes included opioid-related side effects. One-way analyses of variance and follow-up post-hoc Tukey’s honest significant difference statistical tests were used to measure treatment effects. Significantly lower POD1 pain scores for both the ITM and ITM + fentanyl groups vs. control were detected, with no difference between the ITM vs. ITM + fentanyl groups. Similar results were found for POD1 MED intake. A multivariate regression analysis controlling for confounding variables did not attenuate the differences seen in POD1 pain scores while revealing that only the ITM + fentanyl predicted a decrease in POD1 MED intake. No differences were seen for postoperative opioid-related side effects. Our study provides support for supplementing a low dose of both intrathecal morphine and fentanyl to improve postoperative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been evidenced to provide efficient analgesia for hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery (HPB) in the postoperative period. Despite its benefits, ITM carries certain risks, such as pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and of utmost importance, the possibility of delayed respiratory depression. We conducted this study to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and ITM for analgesia following major HPB surgery. Our hypothesis was that bilateral ESPB would lead to a significant reduction in opioid consumption within the first 24 hours following surgery, with a lower incidence of side effects. Methods: Forty patients with scheduled major HPB surgery were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral ESPB (n = 20) or ITM (n = 20) before general anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative nalbuphine consumption in the first 24 hours. Results: Cumulative nalbuphine consumption at 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the ITM group compared to ESPB (3.05 ± 0.38 versus 6.56 ± 0.88 respectively). However, the ESPB group demonstrated effective pain control as indicated by pain scores of =2 at rest and =3 when coughing throughout all measured time points. Moreover, ESPB significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting (p = 0.03), and pruritus (p = 0.003) within the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to ITM. Conclusions: Although bilateral ESPB resulted in higher opioid consumption than ITM in the first 24 hours after major HPB surgery, the adverse effects were less with minimal or no risk of hemodynamic instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective:Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the relationship between intrathecal morphine administration and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), pain score and analgesia consumption in the postoperative period, and maternal fetal effects.Methods:One hundred four pregnant women aged ≥18 years (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or II, >36 weeks gestation) who were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with or without morphine (Group M: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl + 100 mcg morphine; Group F: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl). The effect of intrathecal morphine on PDPH, postoperative pain score, analgesia consumption, and maternal and fetal effects were recorded for 5 days.Results:PDPH developed in a total of 33 patients (Group M: 18 and Group F: 15, P=0.274). When we evaluated PDPH with the VAS, there was no significant difference between the groups. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower in the morphine group, and no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS 1st hr and VAS 2nd hr, whereas the VAS 6th hr and VAS 24th hr were found to be statistically significant. There was no difference in terms of PDPH, the first analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea-vomiting, but meperidine consumption was lower in the morphine group.Conclusion:Low-dose intrathecal morphine did not affect the incidence of PDPH. It is an effective method that can be used in cesarean section patients without increasing the maternal and fetal side effects from postoperative analgesia.

Abstract Background Thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly used for upper gastrointestinal surgery. Intrathecal morphine is an appealing opioid-sparing non-epidural analgesic option, especially for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Methods Following ethics committee approval, we extracted data from the electronic medical records of patients at Royal North Shore Hospital (Sydney, Australia) that had upper gastrointestinal surgery between November 2015 and October 2020. Postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores were modelled with a Bayesian mixed effect model. Results A total of 427 patients were identified who underwent open (n = 300), laparoscopic (n = 120) or laparoscopic converted to open (n = 7) upper gastrointestinal surgery. The majority of patients undergoing open surgery received a neuraxial technique (thoracic epidural [58%, n = 174]; intrathecal morphine [21%, n = 63]) compared to a minority in laparoscopic approaches (thoracic epidural [3%, n = 4]; intrathecal morphine [12%, n = 14]). Intrathecal morphine was superior over non-neuraxial analgesia in terms of lower median oral morphine equivalent consumption and higher probability of adequate pain control; however, this effect was not sustained beyond postoperative day 2. Thoracic epidural analgesia was superior to both intrathecal and non-neuraxial analgesia options for both primary outcomes, but at the expense of higher rates of postoperative hypotension (60%, n = 113) and substantial technique failure rates (32%). Conclusions We found that thoracic epidural analgesia was superior to intrathecal morphine, and intrathecal morphine was superior to non-neuraxial analgesia, in terms of reduced postoperative morphine requirements and the probability of adequate pain control in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery. However, the benefits of thoracic epidural analgesia and intrathecal morphine were not sustained across all time periods regarding control of pain. The study is limited by its retrospective design, heterogenous group of upper gastrointestinal surgeries and confounding by indication.

Copyright of Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine / Ankara Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Mecmuasi is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Analgesia after robot assisted radical cystectomy aims to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption, while facilitating early mobilization and enteral nutrition and minimizing complications. Epidural analgesia is currently recommended for an open radical cystectomy, but it is unclear if intrathecal morphine is a suiting, less-invasive alternative for a robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Methods The analgesic method of choice changed from epidural anesthesia to intrathecal anesthesia for patients undergoing a robot-assisted radical cystectomy. This single-center retrospective study aims to investigate if there is a difference between epidural and intrathecal analgesia in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, length of hospital stays and postoperative complications. An Propensity Matched Analysis was added to conventional analysis to consolidate the findings. Results The study population consisted of 153 patients of whom 114 received an epidural catheter with bupivacaine/sufentanil and 39 received a single shot of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine. Mean pain scores on the first two postoperative days (POD) were slightly higher in the intrathecal analgesia group (epidural versus intrathecal analgesia, NRS POD0: 0(0–2)[0–8] versus 1(0–3)[0–5], p = 0.050; POD1: 2(1–3)[0–8] versus 3(1–4)[0–7], p = 0.058; POD2: 2(0–3)[0–8] versus 3(2–4)[0–7], p = 0.010). Total postoperative morphine consumption was similar over the first seven days: 15 mg (5–35)[0–148] in the epidural group versus 11 mg (0–35)[0–148] in the intrathecal morphine group, p = 0.167. Length of hospital stay and time until fit for discharge where slightly higher in the epidural group (respectively 7 days (5–9)[4–42] versus 6 days (5–7)[4–38], p = 0.006, and 5 days (4–8)[3–30]) versus 5 days (4–6)[3–34], p = 0.018). There was no further difference in postoperative course. Conclusions This study showed that the effects of epidural analgesia and intrathecal morphine are comparable and that intrathecal morphine may be a suiting alternative for epidural analgesia.

Abstract Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Results 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P

Background: Surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures is complicated by postoperative delirium in about one-third of patients. Pain and opioid consumption are modifiable factors that may influence the incidence of delirium.1 An intrathecal injection of morphine may lead to a reduction in postoperative pain and reduced systemic opioid consumption. In current practice, the addition of morphine to intrathecal anaesthesia is commonly used but depends on the anaesthesiologist's preference. Recently, a retrospective study found that intrathecal morphine was independently associated with a lower incidence of delirium. However, this has to be confirmed in a prospective, randomised study. We hypothesise that using intrathecal morphine reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption during the first 48 h after surgery and reduces the incidence of delirium during hospital admission. We also seek additional evidence of the association between neuronal injury (delirium) and neurofilament light in serum of patients with proximal femur fractures. Objective: The primary objective is to compare the incidence of delirium. The secondary objectives are to compare pain scores, systemic opioid consumption, and (opioid-related) side-effects. The tertiary objective is to test the association between intrathecal morphine and neurofilament light as a marker of neuronal injury. Study design: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled intervention study is proposed. Study population: All patients with a proximal femur fracture who are scheduled for surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Intervention: The intervention is the addition of morphine 100 μg to the intrathecal injection for spinal anaesthesia. The intervention group will receive a mixture of bupivacaine 10 mg and morphine 100 μg. The control group will receive bupivacaine 10 mg. Clinical trial registration: EU Clinical Trials Register: EudraCT number 2020-002143-27.

Background: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection is an effective postoperative analgesic strategy in open or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy; however, the optimal dose has not been determined. In this trial, we compared the post‐operative analgesic effects of two doses (300 vs. 400 μg) of ITM injections. Methods: In this prospective randomized non‐inferiority trial, 56 donors were divided into either the 300 μg or 400 μg ITM group (n = 28, each). The primary outcome was the resting pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and side effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were compared up to 48 h postoperatively. Results: Fifty‐five donors participated in the entire study. The mean resting pain scores at 24 h after surgery were 1.7 ± 1.6 and 1.7 ± 1.1 in the ITM 300 and ITM 400 groups, respectively (mean difference, 0 [95% CI, −.8 to.7], p =.978). The upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified non‐inferiority margin (δ = 1), indicating that non‐inferiority had been established. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ITM 300 group than in the ITM 400 group at 18 (p =.035) and 24 h postoperatively (p =.015). There were no significant differences in the resting and coughing pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at any time point. Conclusion: For laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, preoperative ITM 300 μg exhibited non‐inferior postoperative analgesic effects compared to ITM 400 μg, with a lower incidence of PONV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Intrathecal morphine is used as an effective component of multimodal analgesia in postoperative analgesia in cesarean section patients. We aimed to analyze the relationship between intrathecal morphine administration and postdural puncture headache (PDPH), pain score and analgesia consumption in the postoperative period, and maternal fetal effects. Methods: One hundred four pregnant women aged ≥18 years (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I or II, >36 weeks gestation) who were scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in this study. Spinal anesthesia consisted of bupivacaine with or without morphine (Group M: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl + 100 mcg morphine; Group F: 10 mg heavy marcaine + 25 mcg fentanyl). The effect of intrathecal morphine on PDPH, postoperative pain score, analgesia consumption, and maternal and fetal effects were recorded for 5 days. Results: PDPH developed in a total of 33 patients (Group M: 18 and Group F: 15, P=0.274). When we evaluated PDPH with the VAS, there was no significant difference between the groups. The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower in the morphine group, and no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS 1st hr and VAS 2nd hr, whereas the VAS 6th hr and VAS 24th hr were found to be statistically significant. There was no difference in terms of PDPH, the first analgesic requirement and postoperative nausea-vomiting, but meperidine consumption was lower in the morphine group. Conclusion: Low-dose intrathecal morphine did not affect the incidence of PDPH. It is an effective method that can be used in cesarean section patients without increasing the maternal and fetal side effects from postoperative analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly used for upper gastrointestinal surgery. Intrathecal morphine is an appealing opioid-sparing non-epidural analgesic option, especially for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: Following ethics committee approval, we extracted data from the electronic medical records of patients at Royal North Shore Hospital (Sydney, Australia) that had upper gastrointestinal surgery between November 2015 and October 2020. Postoperative morphine consumption and pain scores were modelled with a Bayesian mixed effect model. Results: A total of 427 patients were identified who underwent open (n = 300), laparoscopic (n = 120) or laparoscopic converted to open (n = 7) upper gastrointestinal surgery. The majority of patients undergoing open surgery received a neuraxial technique (thoracic epidural [58%, n = 174]; intrathecal morphine [21%, n = 63]) compared to a minority in laparoscopic approaches (thoracic epidural [3%, n = 4]; intrathecal morphine [12%, n = 14]). Intrathecal morphine was superior over non-neuraxial analgesia in terms of lower median oral morphine equivalent consumption and higher probability of adequate pain control; however, this effect was not sustained beyond postoperative day 2. Thoracic epidural analgesia was superior to both intrathecal and non-neuraxial analgesia options for both primary outcomes, but at the expense of higher rates of postoperative hypotension (60%, n = 113) and substantial technique failure rates (32%). Conclusions: We found that thoracic epidural analgesia was superior to intrathecal morphine, and intrathecal morphine was superior to non-neuraxial analgesia, in terms of reduced postoperative morphine requirements and the probability of adequate pain control in patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery. However, the benefits of thoracic epidural analgesia and intrathecal morphine were not sustained across all time periods regarding control of pain. The study is limited by its retrospective design, heterogenous group of upper gastrointestinal surgeries and confounding by indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We questioned whether the triple analgesic pathways procedure via local infiltration analgesia (LIA), peripheral nerve blocks, and intrathecal morphine (ITM) is superior to LIA only for controlling pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This retrospective study included 192 primary TKA patients. Group A (76 patients) received LIA only, Group B (61 patients) had ITM, adductor canal block and LIA, while Group C (55 patients) received ITM, femoral nerve block and LIA. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare visual analog scales (VAS) for pain intensity, total amount of morphine consumption (TMC), angle of knee flexion, and length of hospital stay (LHS). Results: Group A showed significantly higher VAS than Group B at 12 h (4.27 ± 2.70 vs 2.42 ± 2.35) and 18 h (4.24 ± 2.35 vs 2.18 ± 2.02), and significantly higher than Group C at 6 h (3.46 ± 3.07 vs 0.60 ± 1.50), 12 h (4.27 ± 2.70 vs 0.89 ± 1.48), and 18 h postoperative (4.24 ± 2.35 vs 1.82 ± 2.18). However, the VAS of Group C and B converged to equalize with Group A after 12 and 18 h, respectively. The TMC at 48 h postoperative of Group A was higher than that of Group B (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no difference between groups in terms of knee flexion and LHS, except the LHS of Group B was longer than Group A (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Triple analgesic pathways could provide a better initial analgesic profile. However, the pain seems to be rebound after resolution of nerve block and ITM, with potentially longer LHS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Opioids are frequently added to neuroaxial local anesthetics (LAs). Intrathecal (IT) opioid is not devoid of adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression, and pruritis. IT atropine also carries a significant antiemetic effect, and this can be a valuable modality for the prevention of IT opioidrelated PONV. The antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors such as ondasetron which is usually used to decrease the incidence of nausea and vomiting was considered for the prevention and treatment of neuroaxial opioid-induced (PONV). Method 100 cases of ASA I-II aged 18 and 45 who planned to do elective perineal surgery, and receiving bupivacaine spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group (A) cases received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg 0.5%) in combination with morphine 250 μg and atropine sulphate 100 μg. Before anesthesia, group (B) participants received IT hyperbaric bupivacaine (10mg 0.5%) and 250 μg of morphine and 4mg IV ondansetron. Follow-up for PONV attacks, vital signs, and side effects in the two groups. Results The occurrence of postoperative nausea were 4 and 18% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.049) while postoperative vomiting was 0 and 12% in group A and B, respectively (P value=0.027). The occurrence of sedation, mouth dryness, headache, and drowsiness were more in group A compared with group B. Conclusion IT atropine is more effective than IV ondasetron preoperative in relieving PONV related to IT morphine, sedation is the frequent side effect occurred in IT atropine, headache is the frequent side effect occurred in the ondasetron group [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intrathecal morphine provides excellent postoperative pain relief but results in pruritus in 30-60% of patients. Nalbuphine, an opioid agonist-antagonist prevents intrathecal morphine-induced itch when given by intravenous route. In this study, we compared efficacy of intrathecal and intravenous nalbuphine for the prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups. IT group received 100 mcg of morphine with 400 mcg of nalbuphine intrathecally. IV group received 100 mcg of morphine intrathecally and 400 mcg of nalbuphine intravenously. Incidence of itching, respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, sedation and analgesia were compared between the groups every 4th hourly for 24 hours. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test. Incidence of itching in 24 hours period was 11.6% (5 patients) in IV group and 4.8% (2 patients) in IT group which was comparable. (P= 0.250) Two patients in IV group had intractable itching requiring naloxone. Incidence of itching at all time intervals was comparable between the groups. Analgesia was prolonged in IV group (P=0.03) Incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression was comparable. We conclude that intrathecal nalbuphine and intravenous nalbuphine were equally effective in preventing intrathecal morphine induced pruritus. The duration of analgesia was more when nalbuphine was given by IV route as compared to IT route. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a popular anesthetic of choice for cesarean section but inadequate analgesia may result in delayed ambulation and healing after surgery. Multimodal analgesia is currently applied to decrease the adverse effect of each medication, enhance analgesic efficacy and promote Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen are recommended for enhanced recovery after cesarean section (ERAC). Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy of a combination of acetaminophen or selective COX-II inhibitors with intrathecal morphine and intrathecal morphine alone after cesarean section. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight parturients undergoing cesarean section were divided into three groups. Acetaminophen group: intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg and intravenous acetaminophen 1 gram every 6 hours. Parecoxib group: intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg and intravenous parecoxib every 12 hours. Control group: intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg only. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity, vomiting episodes, and time to first dose of opioid. Results: The parecoxib group showed total morphine reduction in the first 24 hours of 10.655 mg (95% CI -15.04 to -6.27, p<0.001) compared with the control group. The pain intensity at rest and movement decreased in the parecoxib group compared to the control group at 4, 8, and 12 hours postoperatively (at rest: p=0.020, 0.001, and 0.002, at movement: p=0.002, 0.002, and 0.002). The acetaminophen group showed reduction of the pain intensity at 4 hours postoperative compared with the control group (p=0.011). Vomiting episodes and total ondansetron consumption were lower in the parecoxib group and the acetaminophen group. The parecoxib group also showed prolonged time to first dose of opioid usage. Conclusion: Parecoxib decreased total opioid consumption, decreased postoperative vomiting episodes and increased time for first dose opioid requirement. Acetaminophen also reduced the pain intensity and vomiting at 4 hours postoperative. The alternative and multimodal concepts in intraoperative and postoperative pain medications are the easiest ERAC components to improve outcome for the anesthesiologist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Intravenous dexamethasone is recommended in elective caesarean delivery to decrease postoperative pain. However, the efficacy of spinal anaesthesia with an intrathecal long-acting opioid such as morphine or diamorphine for caesarean delivery has not been systematically investigated. Methods: We searched all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pregnant women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia with an intrathecal morphine or diamorphine via MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov on May 18, 2022. Primary outcomes were time to first rescue analgesia, consumption of oral morphine equivalents, and incidence of drug-related adverse reactions. We evaluated the risk of bias for each outcome using the Risk of Bias 2. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model. We evaluated the certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Results: Five RCTs (455 patients) were included. The results of intravenous dexamethasone were as follows: time to first rescue analgesia (mean difference [MD] 0.99 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.86 to 2.84; very low certainty) and consumption of oral morphine equivalents (MD − 6.55 mg, 95% CI − 17.13 to 4.02; moderate certainty). No incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was reported (very low certainty). Conclusion: The evidence was very uncertain about the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone on time to first rescue analgesia and the incidence of drug-related adverse reactions. Intravenous dexamethasone probably reduces the consumption of oral morphine equivalents. Anaesthesiologists might want to consider intravenous dexamethasone for postoperative pain after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia with an intrathecal long-acting opioid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women receiving intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery may experience hypothermia with paradoxical symptoms of sweating, nausea, and shivering. Despite being relatively rare in comparison to commonly experienced symptoms of perioperative hypothermia, hypothermia with paradoxical symptoms affects early maternal recovery and comfort. The cause is undetermined, and treatment approaches vary. Regular active‐warming strategies may not be tolerated because of the paradoxical symptoms of sweating and feeling overheated. This case series aims to explore the phenomenon through the evaluation of health care records of women receiving intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery at a single, tertiary health care institution in Australia from 2015 to 2018. We also summarize published literature to review treatment approaches used in the care of women experiencing profound heat loss while feeling overheated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Priapism refers to prolonged erection unrelated to sexual stimulation, with severe sequelae unless treated. In humans, it is a rare complication associated with epidural or spinal opioid administration. Its pathophysiology is unclear. This is the first report of priapism following neuraxial anaesthesia in dog. Case Description: An intrathecal morphine injection (30 mcg/kg) at L5-L6 for postoperative analgesia was given at the end of surgery for multiple cutaneous mastocytoma of the abdomen and left axillary lymphadenectomy. Painless penile erection occurred 2 hours later and lasted 6 hours, before spontaneously resolving 7 to 8 hours after the injection. No pain or other adverse events (e.g., nausea, urinary retention, itching) were recorded. Recovery was complete without treatment. Conclusion: Painless, self-resolving priapism is a rare complication associated with intrathecal morphine injection in dogs. [Open Vet J 2022; 12(5.000): 693-696]

Background: Analgesia after robot assisted radical cystectomy aims to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption, while facilitating early mobilization and enteral nutrition and minimizing complications. Epidural analgesia is currently recommended for an open radical cystectomy, but it is unclear if intrathecal morphine is a suiting, less-invasive alternative for a robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Methods: The analgesic method of choice changed from epidural anesthesia to intrathecal anesthesia for patients undergoing a robot-assisted radical cystectomy. This single-center retrospective study aims to investigate if there is a difference between epidural and intrathecal analgesia in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, length of hospital stays and postoperative complications. An Propensity Matched Analysis was added to conventional analysis to consolidate the findings. Results: The study population consisted of 153 patients of whom 114 received an epidural catheter with bupivacaine/sufentanil and 39 received a single shot of intrathecal bupivacaine/morphine. Mean pain scores on the first two postoperative days (POD) were slightly higher in the intrathecal analgesia group (epidural versus intrathecal analgesia, NRS POD0: 0(0–2)[0–8] versus 1(0–3)[0–5], p = 0.050; POD1: 2(1–3)[0–8] versus 3(1–4)[0–7], p = 0.058; POD2: 2(0–3)[0–8] versus 3(2–4)[0–7], p = 0.010). Total postoperative morphine consumption was similar over the first seven days: 15 mg (5–35)[0–148] in the epidural group versus 11 mg (0–35)[0–148] in the intrathecal morphine group, p = 0.167. Length of hospital stay and time until fit for discharge where slightly higher in the epidural group (respectively 7 days (5–9)[4–42] versus 6 days (5–7)[4–38], p = 0.006, and 5 days (4–8)[3–30]) versus 5 days (4–6)[3–34], p = 0.018). There was no further difference in postoperative course. Conclusions: This study showed that the effects of epidural analgesia and intrathecal morphine are comparable and that intrathecal morphine may be a suiting alternative for epidural analgesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesia produced by low-dose Intrathecal Morphine as an adjuvant to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia and its side-effect profile in Lower Segment Cesarean patients. Methods: It was a prospective observational study conducted in 150 patients who underwent Cesarean section delivery under general anaesthesia. The duration of the study was one year, and it was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in the UAE. Result: This study included 150 participants. Postoperative VAS pain scores averaged 0.21 in the study population. Low-dose ITM provided postoperative analgesia for all 150 patients. The average 24-hour pruritus score was 0.01. The study group's mean PONV grade was 1.01. The first postoperative day was nausea-free for 88% of 132 participants. 149 patients (99.3%) had a respiratory rate exceeding 10/minute. The study population averaged 16.7 breaths per minute. 149 individuals (99.3%) had SpO2 above 92%. The study group averaged 98.1% SpO2. Our patients experienced no respiratory depression. The study group's average MAP was 81 mmHg, 100% of 150 patients had MAP values < 60 mmHg. Conclusion: The study concludes that the addition of 0.075 mg of Intrathecal Morphine is an excellent adjuvant to 12.5 mg of 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia with the lowest side-effect profile in Lower Segment Cesarean patients for spinal anaesthesia and also recommends the use of I.V Ondansetron 8 mg immediately after spinal anaesthesia as an antiemetic prophylaxis to have a comparatively lower incidence of PONV postoperatively. This prophylactic ondansetron also tends to significantly reduce the frequency of hypotensive episodes which allowed us to use reduced doses of vasopressor infusions as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intrathecal infusion therapy is indicated for refractory chronic pain, regardless of its origin (oncologic or not). Morphine and ziconotide are the only drugs approved for use as intrathecal analgesics. The addition of local anesthetics slows the escalation of opioid doses. We present the case of a woman with stage IV breast cancer, with multiple dorsal vertebral metastases, evaluated by the Chronic Pain Unit for severe, disabling pain refractory to conventional measures. An intrathecal pump of morphine and bupivacaine was implanted after a positive intrathecal test dose. Afterward, she had excellent pain control with full functional recovery and no need for adjuvant medication, regardless of disease progression. The use of intrathecal infusion therapy has become a safe and effective tool to consider in cases of refractory oncologic chronic pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods: Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Results: 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Conclusions: In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Trial registration: Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(http://www.chictr.org.cn) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic liver surgery has undergone substantial advancements over the past few decades, and the key to this improvement has been an improved understanding of liver anatomy, radiologic imaging, and advancements in anesthesia and postoperative care. This study aimed to compare postoperative opioid consumption in patients receiving intrathecal morphine plus low-dose bupivacaine versus those receiving intravenous morphine. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 40 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups, of which one received 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine plus 0.25% Marcaine in a total volume of 4 mL and the other received intravenous morphine intraoperatively. Pain relief and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the visual analog scale. Intraoperative blood loss was measured at the end of the surgery while morphine consumption was measured by monitoring intravenous patient-controlled morphine at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Treatment efficacy and complications were documented. Results: Morphine consumption was significantly different in both groups at all time points, although the pain score did not show any difference. Shoulder pain, a common adverse effect of laparoscopic surgery, was significantly lower in the intrathecal group (25% vs. 75%). Blood loss and patient satisfaction were not different between the groups. However, the intrathecal group showed a significantly higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension. Conclusion: Intrathecal morphine with bupivacaine can be used effectively for managing acute post-LLR pain. Thai Clinical trial registry: TCTR20211015004. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and purpose of the study Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides optimal postoperative analgesia in patients who are scheduled for total knee and hip operation with spinal anaesthesia. However, the ideal dose at which maximal analgesic effect occurs with minimal side effects is not known. This study aimed to describe the use of two doses of ITM and side effect profile in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods This was a prospective, descriptive, and contextual study conducted on patients who had total hip and knee replacement at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital from 1 September to 30 November 2020. The sample size consisted of 66 patients who were 18 years and older, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification 1–3, patients who had received either 100 mcg or 150 mcg ITM dose under spinal anaesthesia and sent to the ward postoperatively. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was used to assess pain in the first 24 h, consumption of rescue analgesia and reported side effects were documented. Results There was no relationship between age, weight, ASA classification or type of surgery and VAS score classification groups. Patients who received 100 mcg ITM had a higher median VAS pain score 2 (1–5) compared to those who received 150 mcg ITM 1 (0–2), p = 0.01. The need for rescue analgesia between the two groups was marginally less in the 150 mcg ITM group (p = 0.098). There was no difference in the rate of side effects between the 100 mcg ITM group [12 (41%)] and the 150 mcg ITM group [17 (59%)], p = 0.92. Rescue analgesia was marginally different between groups, p = 0.09. There were no real differences in the VAS pain scores between the total knee and total hip surgeries. None of the patients experienced clinically significant respiratory depression. Conclusion The 150 mcg ITM dose provided good analgesic effects with longer duration of action and comparable side effect profile to the 100 mcg ITM dose. This dose was not associated with development of respiratory depression and can therefore be administered safely to patients who are discharged to the ward postoperatively in a resource constraint environment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine following selective dorsal rhizotomy in pediatric patients previously diagnosed with cerebral palsy. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort analysis over the course of four years. The analysis consisted of a treatment group which received intrathecal morphine (5 mcg/kg) injection and a control group that did not receive the injection prior to dural closure. All patients underwent multilevel laminectomies for selective dorsal rhizotomy at Akron Children's Hospital. The effectiveness of the treatment was measured by total dose of hydromorphone administered on patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), number of days on oral narcotics, and cumulative dose of oral narcotic. RESULTS: Of the analyzed 15 pediatric patients, seven patients received intrathecal morphine injection while the other eight did not receive the treatment prior to dural closure. There was a difference of 1135 mcg in total PCA dose between the study group (3243 mcg) and the control group (4378 mcg). The total PCA dose based on weight was lower in the study group (163 mcg/kg) than in the control group (171 mcg/kg). CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, the administration of intrathecal morphine clinically reduces the opiate need in the first 96 hours post-operatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The management of postoperative pain after knee replacement is an important clinical problem. The best results in the treatment of postoperative pain are obtained using multimodal therapy principles. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) and single-shot femoral nerve block (SSFNB) are practiced in the treatment of postoperative pain after knee replacement, with the most optimal methods still under debate. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy with special consideration of selected side effects of both methods. (2) Materials and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients undergoing knee arthroplasty surgery at the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Medical University of Warsaw were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the ITM group, 100 micrograms of intrathecal morphine were used, and in the SSFNB group, a femoral nerve block in the distal femoral triangle was used as postoperative analgesia. The other elements of anesthesia and surgery did not differ between the groups. (3) Results: The total dose of morphine administered in the postoperative period and the effectiveness of pain management did not differ significantly between the groups (cumulative median morphine dose in 24 h in the ITM group 31 mg vs. SSFNB group 29 mg). The incidence of nausea and pruritus in the postoperative period differed significantly in favor of patients treated with a femoral nerve block. (4) Conclusions: Although intrathecal administration of morphine is similarly effective in the treatment of pain after knee replacement surgery as a single femoral triangle nerve block, it is associated with a higher incidence of cumbersome side effects, primarily nausea and pruritus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background There is scant clinical research on neuraxial analgesia in dogs undergoing major surgery. With this study we compared the perioperative analgesic effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) in dogs scheduled for thoracic or cranial abdominal surgery. The dogs received methadone and dexmedetomidine, were anaesthetized with propofol maintained with sevoflurane, and randomly assigned to receive either TEA (ropivacaine 0.5% at 0.2 mg/kg and morphine 0.1 mg/kg administered at T12-T13) or ITM (morphine 30 μg/kg administered at L6-L7). Intraoperative rescue analgesia (iRA) was fentanyl 1 μg/kg administered if heart rate or mean arterial pressure increased by 30% above the pre-stimulation level. Glasgow Pain Composite Scale score (GPCS) dictated the use of postoperative rescue analgesia (pRA) with methadone 0.2 mg/kg. Results There was a statistically significant difference in iRA, median time to first fentanyl bolus, median fentanyl dose after surgical opening, and median GPCS score at 30 minutes (min), 1 ,2, 4, 6, and 8 hours (h) between the two groups (p

Abstract Background The complications of postoperative pain, such as hypertension, hypermetabolism, irritability, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, significantly affect the postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients. Intrathecal morphine prolongs analgesia after surgery, but has been implicated in nausea and vomiting, pruritus, postoperative respiratory depression, or apneic episodes. The present study explored the effect and safety of low-dose morphine used adjunctively with bupivacaine during single spinal anesthesia or sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients with hip fracture surgery. Since elderly patients often need anticoagulant therapy in the early postoperative period, single spinal anesthesia was involved in completing the operation in this study. Methods Eighty elderly patients aged 70–85 years who underwent elective hip fracture surgery with single spinal anesthesia were divided into two groups, 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 100 µg of morphine (morphine group, group M) and 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 100 µg of sufentanil PCIA (sufentanil group, group S). The analgesia scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Brinell comfort scale (BCS) were evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, and adverse reactions were recorded such as nausea and vomiting, pruritus, sedation, respiratory depression, and POD (postoperative delirium) with Delirium Rating Scale-r 98. Results Within 24 h after operation, the analgesic and BCS scores of group M were better than those of group S (P

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery. This is in comparison with traditional opioid analgesics such as intravenous (IV) morphine. Methods Two groups were identified retrospectively. The first (ITM group) included patients who had general anaesthesia (GA) with low-dose spinal anaesthesia prior to induction using 1–4 mls of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.2 mg ITM. 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered per hour of predicted surgery time, up to a maximum of 4 ml. The insertion level for the spinal anaesthetic corresponded to the spinal level of the iliac crest line and the level at which the spinal cord terminated. The control group had GA without any spinal anaesthesia. Patients were instead administered opioid analgesia in the form of IV morphine or diamorphine. The primary outcome was the consumption of opioids administered intraoperatively and in recovery, and over the first 48 h following discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Total opioid dose was measured, and a morphine equivalent dose was calculated. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores in recovery and at day two postoperatively, and the length of stay in hospital. Results For the ITM group, the median total amount of IV morphine equivalent administered intraoperatively and in recovery, was 0 mg versus 17 mg. The median total amount morphine equivalent, administered over the first 48 h following discharge from PACU was 20 mg versus 80 mg. Both are in comparison with the control group. The median length of stay was over 1 day less and the median VAS for pain in recovery was 6 points lower. No evidence was found for a difference in the worst VAS for pain at day two postoperatively. Conclusion ITM in combination with bupivacaine results in a significantly decreased use of perioperative opioids. In addition, length of hospital stay is reduced and so too is patient perceived pain intensity. Trial registration The study was approved by the ethics committee at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital as a service improvement project (Approval no. 1617_004).

Background: Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine is widely used for cesarean section (CS), and is associated with nocturnal desaturation. No studies have correlated respiratory depression (RD) in this population with the Mallampati (MMP) classification. We examine the value of MMP for preoperative risk stratification. Method: MMP was assessed preoperatively in patients scheduled for elective CS under spinal anesthesia. We defined RD events as follows within 24 hours postoperatively, measured by mainstream capnometry waveform analysis: 1. Bradypnea (RR ≤ 9 bpm for ≥ 120 seconds); 2. Apnea (PETCO2 < 5 mmHg for ≥ 15 seconds up to 120 seconds); 3. Temporary hypopnea (5 mmHg ≤ PETCO2 < 15 mmHg for ≥ 15 seconds up to 120 seconds); 4. Sustained hypopnea (PETCO2 > 45 mmHg for ≥ 120 seconds). Results: There were 100 patients with MMP 1-2, and 90 patients with MMP 3-4. Bradypnea was observed in 55 patients (MMP 1-2, 55%) vs. 55 patients (MMP 3-4, 61%), p = 0.394. Apnea was observed in 77 patients (MMP 1-2, 77%) vs. 75 patients (MMP 3-4, 83%), p = 0.276. Temporary hypopnea was observed in 68 patients (MMP 1-2, 68%) vs. 76 patients (MMP 3-4, 84%), p = 0.008. No sustained hypopnea events were noted in any patients. Conclusions: Temporary hypopnea was more frequent in patients with MMP 3-4 vs. 1-2, following 0.15 mg intrathecal morphine for CS. The study was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000031410).