Search

Simple Summary: Current interventions for breast–cancer prevention are associated with adverse side effects that frequently deter women from selecting these evidence-based risk-reducing procedures. In addition, modifiable lifestyle changes can improve breast cancer risk but can be challenging in execution. Therefore, women who are considered high risk due to non-modifiable factors, such as BRCA1/2 mutations or a strong family history of breast cancer, are in need of alternative prevention procedures. Here, we review investigational preclinical and clinical approaches at a systemic and local level that focus on non-modifiable breast cancer risk-reducing interventions. One in eight women will develop breast cancer in the US. For women with moderate (15–20%) to average (12.5%) risk of breast cancer, there are few options available for risk reduction. For high-risk (>20%) women, such as BRCA mutation carriers, primary prevention strategies are limited to evidence-based surgical removal of breasts and/or ovaries and anti-estrogen treatment. Despite their effectiveness in risk reduction, not many high-risk individuals opt for surgical or hormonal interventions due to severe side effects and potentially life-changing outcomes as key deterrents. Thus, better communication about the benefits of existing strategies and the development of new strategies with minimal side effects are needed to offer women adequate risk-reducing interventions. We extensively review and discuss innovative investigational strategies for primary prevention. Most of these investigational strategies are at the pre-clinical stage, but some are already being evaluated in clinical trials and others are expected to lead to first-in-human clinical trials within 5 years. Likely, these strategies would be initially tested in high-risk individuals but may be applicable to lower-risk women, if shown to decrease risk at a similar rate to existing strategies, but with minimal side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nanoemulsions modified with chitosan (NE-Q) or hyaluronic acid (NE-HA), developed for intraductal administration of piplartine (piperlongumine) and local breast cancer treatment, were evaluated for cytotoxic effects in vitro in 2D and 3D breast cancer models and in vivo in a chemically induced carcinogenesis model. Droplet size was lower than 100 nm, and zeta potential varied from +17.9 to −25.5 mV for NE-Q and NE-HA, respectively. Piplartine nanoencapsulation reduced its IC 50 up to 3.6-fold in T-47D and MCF-7 monolayers without differences between NE-Q and NE-HA, and up to 6.6-fold in cancer spheroids. Cytotoxicity improvement may result from a more efficient NE-mediated delivery, as suggested by stronger fluorescent staining of cells and spheroids. In 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea -induced breast cancer models, intraductal administration of piplartine-loaded NE-HA inhibited breast tumor development and histological alterations. These results support the potential applicability of piplartine-loaded NE-HA for intraductal treatment of breast cancer. • Similar cytotoxicity of nanoemulsions independently on polysaccharide • Piplartine nanoencapsulation reduced its IC 50 in cancer cells up to 3.6-fold • IC 50 was reduced up to 6.6-fold in cancer spheroids • More efficient NE-mediated intracellular delivery compared to solutions • Intraductal administration of piplartine-NE-HA inhibited breast tumor development [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a new strategy for treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ , biocompatible and bioadhesive nanoemulsions for intraductal administration of the cytotoxic agent piplartine (piperlongumine) were optimized in this study. To confer bioadhesive properties, the nanoemulsion was modified with chitosan or hyaluronic acid. Tricaprylin was selected as the nanoemulsion non-polar phase due to its ability to dissolve larger drug amounts compared to isopropyl myristate and monocaprylin. Use of phosphatidylcholine as sole surfactant did not result in a homogeneous nanoemulsion, while its association with polysorbate 80 and glycerol (in a surfactant blend) led to the formation of nanoemulsions with droplet size of 76.5 ± 1.2 nm. Heating the aqueous phase to 50 °C enabled sonication time reduction from 20 to 10 min. Inclusion of either chitosan or hyaluronic acid resulted in nanoemulsions with similar in vitro bioadhesive potential, and comparable ability to prolong mammary tissue retention (to 120 h) in vivo without causing undesirable histological alterations. Piplartine was stable in both nanoemulsions for 60 days; however, the size of loaded NE-HA was maintained at a similar range for longer periods of time, suggesting that this nanoemulsion may be a stronger candidate for intraductal delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug delivery by direct intraductal administration can achieve high local drug concentration in the breast and minimize systemic levels. However, the clinical application of this approach for breast cancer treatment is limited by the rapid clearance of the drug from the ducts. With the goal of developing strategies to prolong drug retention in the breast, this study was focused on understanding the influence of particle size and formulation on breast duct and lymph node retention. Fluorescent-labeled polystyrene (PS) particles ranging in size from 100 to 1000 nm were used to study the influence of particle size. Polylactic acid- co -glycolic acid (PLGA) was used to develop and test formulations for intraductal delivery. Cy 5.5, a near-IR dye, was encapsulated in PLGA microparticles, nanoparticles, and the in situ gel to study the biodistribution in rats using an in vivo imager. PS microparticles (1 μm) showed longer retention in the duct compared to 100 and 500 nm nanoparticles. The ductal retention half-life was 5-fold higher for PS microparticles compared to the nanoparticles. On the other hand, the free dye was cleared from the breast within 6 h. PLGA nanoparticles sustained the release of Cy 5.5 for >4 days. Microparticles and gel showed a much slower release than nanoparticles. PLGA in situ gel and microparticles were retained in the breast for up to 4 days, while the nanoparticles were retained in the breast for 2 days. PLGA nanoparticles and microparticles drained to the axillary lymph node and were retained for up to 24 and 48 h, respectively, while the in situ gel and the free dye did not show any detectable fluorescence in the lymph nodes. Taken together, the results demonstrate the feasibility of prolonged retention in the breast duct and lymph node by optimal formulation design. The findings can serve as a framework to design formulations for localized treatment of breast cancer.