Search

How to effectively maintain costly intra-group cooperation has always been a topic of great concern in society. As we all know, inter-group competition is a constructive way to promote intra-group cooperation. Previous inter-group competition mechanisms are primarily based on the total contribution value of all individuals in the group in the current round, which ignore the historical behavior of the group and its members. For comparison, we argue that the introduction of collective reputation which reflects not only the total contribution of the groups in the current round but also the group's historical behavior is necessary for the construction of an inter-group competition model. Furthermore, an excellent collective reputation can help the group obtain more high-quality resources and help the group stand out from the competition. To this end, we introduce a new mechanism of inter-group transfer payment driven by collective reputation and construct a public goods game (PGG) model of inter-group competition to study the dynamic behavior of intra-group cooperation evolution. Two parameters, the proportion of accepted groups a and the proportion of transferred groups b , are introduced. The simulation results suggest that the effectiveness of this model in promoting cooperation depends largely on the joint settings of a and b. And in most cases, the combination of small a and medium b plays the significant role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In this study, we propose novel centrality measures considering multiple perspectives of nodes or node groups based on the facility location problem on a spatial network. The conventional centrality exclusively quantifies the global properties of each node in a network such as closeness and betweenness, and extracts nodes with high scores as important nodes. In the context of facility placement on a network, it is desirable to place facilities at nodes with high accessibility from residents, that is, nodes with a high score in closeness centrality. It is natural to think that such a property of a node changes when the situation changes. For example, in a situation where there are no existing facilities, it is expected that the demand of residents will be satisfied by opening a new facility at the node with the highest accessibility, however, in a situation where there exist some facilities, it is necessary to open a new facility some distance from the existing facilities. Furthermore, it is natural to consider that the concept of closeness differs depending on the relationship with existing facilities, cooperative relationships and competitive relationships. Therefore, we extend a concept of centrality so as to considers the situation where one or more nodes have already been selected belonging to one of some groups. In this study, we propose two measures based on closeness centrality and betweenness centrality as behavior models of people on a spatial network. From our experimental evaluations using actual urban street network data, we confirm that the proposed method, which introduces the viewpoints of each group, shows that there is a difference in the important nodes of each group viewpoint, and that the new store location can be predicted more accurately.

We investigate the impact of asymmetry on behavior in inter-team contests. In asymmetric environments, one team has a greater probability of winning given the same contribution level (unfair contests) or has a lower cost of contributing (uneven contests). We explore how such asymmetries impact behavior, asking how being advantaged or disadvantaged influences contributions. We find both advantaged and disadvantaged teams contribute much more than theory predicts, but in such a way that ex-post winning probabilities of the contests are consistent with theoretical predictions. At the individual level, contributions are predicted by beliefs about own team and opponent team contributions. The determinants of contribution by members of the disadvantaged team differ depending on the nature of asymmetry. Contributions by the disadvantaged team members are responsive to beliefs about contribution by opponents in unfair contests while in uneven contests they are responsive to beliefs about the contribution by teammates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Group members typically prefer leaders who have characteristics or attitudes that are in line with group norms (i.e., are normative). In this paper, we explore the possibility that in highly competitive inter-group contexts, group members prefer leaders who can more effectively differentiate the in-group from out-groups, leading to a preference for leaders with more extreme attitudes that are in line with group norms (i.e., pro-normative). In three experiments conducted in an election context in the United States, we find that both Democrats' and Republicans' preference for an extreme leader increases under conditions of high inter-group competition. Results indicate that participants' heightened need to differentiate their political party from the competing party drives this effect, and that this effect is stronger for those who identify strongly with their political party. Implications for group members' responses to in-group deviance and leadership support are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apart from the amount and distribution of food resources and predation pressure, we sought to clarify habitat spatial features that affect group size and group density. To simulate animal groups interacting with one another, we made an agent-based model in a computational space. Assuming no predation pressure, we change the resource conditions between the habitat (comprising 'interior' and 'edges') and the 'exterior'. The results are as follows: when the group density is high throughout the habitat, large groups tend to frequent the edges (i.e., the boundaries between the interior and exterior) even if food resources are scarce in the exterior. Additionally, when the group density is high and the group size variation is small, both group size and group density increase at the edges. These findings are discussed with reference to primates, particularly the Japanese macaque ( Macaca fuscata) as an example of group-living animal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inclusive fitness theory predicts that cost of tolerant behaviour during competitive interactions is lower for relatives than for nonrelatives. Many studies have examined the effect of relatedness on behaviour within social groups. In contrast, kin selection acting among groups has received less attention. The genetic structure of African lion (Panthera leo) populations creates a strong possibility that kin selection among groups modifies behaviour during group conflicts. We used playback experiments and genetic data to investigate the importance of relatedness during simulated territorial disputes in lions. However, we found no effect of relatedness on territorial behaviour. Degree of relatedness did not affect the decision to approach simulated intrusions, nor did it affect the behaviour during approaches. The decision to approach was instead affected by position within the territory and consecutive playback number (a measure of habituation). For playbacks that did elicit an approach, the speed of response was not detectably affected by relatedness, but was affected by odds (the ratio of residents to intruders), number of intruders, number of bouts, presence of cubs, position within the territory, temperature and playback number. Although responses were unaffected by relatedness, it remains possible that other aspects of behaviour during natural encounters among prides are affected by kin selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The per capita home range area of Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata, is significantly smaller in evergreen forest than in deciduous forest, though a corresponding difference in food resource utilization patterns has never been described. The present study compared the home range utilization pattern of Japanese macaques living in two habitats: the Yakushima population inhabits an evergreen forest, while the Kinkazan population inhabits a deciduous forest. We found that in the Yakushima population, (1) food density was higher; (2) inter-feeding bout sites distance was shorter; (3) daily travel distance was shorter; (4) home range size was smaller; and (5) the unit value of the main home range was higher, than in the Kinkazan population. Yakushima groups utilized a small home range area intensively, compared to Kinkazan groups. We also found that a Yakushima group shared 24% of its main home range with neighboring groups, though a Kinkazan group shared only 10% with other groups. It is supposed that food distribution affects daily ranging pattern, and ultimately the social relationships between groups in Japanese macaques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]