Search

Purpose: Plan complexity and robustness are two essential aspects of treatment plan quality but there is a great variability in their management in clinical practice. This study reports the results of the 2020 ESTRO survey on plan complexity and robustness to identify needs and guide future discussions and con-sensus.Methods: A survey was distributed online to ESTRO members. Plan complexity was defined as the mod-ulation of machine parameters and increased uncertainty in dose calculation and delivery. Robustness was defined as a dose distribution's sensitivity towards errors stemming from treatment uncertainties, patient setup, or anatomical changes.Results: A total of 126 radiotherapy centres from 33 countries participated, 95 of them (75%) from Europe and Central Asia. The majority controlled and evaluated plan complexity using monitor units (56 centres) and aperture shapes (38 centres). To control robustness, 98 (97% of question responses) photon and 5 (50%) proton centres used PTV margins for plan optimization while 75 (94%) and 5 (50%), respectively, used margins for plan evaluation. Seventeen (21%) photon and 8 (80%) proton centres used robust opti-misation, while 10 (13%) and 8 (80%), respectively, used robust evaluation. Primary uncertainties consid-ered were patient setup (photons and protons) and range calculation uncertainties (protons). Participants expressed the need for improved commercial tools to control and evaluate plan complexity and robust-ness.Conclusion: Clinical implementation of methods to control and evaluate plan complexity and robustness is very heterogeneous. Better tools are needed to manage complexity and robustness in treatment plan-ning systems. International guidelines may promote harmonization.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 173 (2022) 254-261 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Background and purpose Radiotherapy dose painting is a promising technique which enables dose escalation to areas of higher tumour cell density within the prostate which are associated with radioresistance, known as dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs). The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the feasibility of radiotherapy dose painting in patients with high and intermediate risk prostate cancer. Materials & Methods Twenty patients were recruited into the study for imaging using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Identified DILs were outlined and the scan registered with the planning computed tomography (CT) dataset. Intensity-modulated plans were produced and evaluated to determine the effect of the organ-at-risk constraints on the dose that could be delivered to the DILs. Measurements were made to verify that the distribution could be safely delivered. Results MRI scans were obtained for nineteen patients. Fourteen patients had one to two DILs with ten overlapping the urethra and/or rectum. The target boost of 86 Gy was achieved in seven plans but was limited to 80 Gy for five patients whose boost volume overlapped or abutted the urethra. Dosimetric measurements gave a satisfactory gamma pass rate at 3%/3 mm. Conclusions It was feasible to produce dose-painted plans for a boost of 86 Gy for approximately half the patients with DILs. The main limiting factor was the proximity of the urethra to the boost volumes. For a small proportion of patients, rigid registration between CT and MRI images was not adequate for planning purposes.

Contains fulltext : 207179.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) PURPOSE: One of the major challenges in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of renal cell carcinoma is internal motion during treatment. Previous literature has aimed to mitigate the effects of motion by expanding the treatment margins or respiratory tracking. Online magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy has the potential to further improve the treatment of renal cell carcinoma by direct visualization of the tumor during treatment. The efficacy of 2 motion management techniques were assessed: tumor trailing and respiratory tracking. The simulation of a single-fraction, MRI-based SBRT was performed to quantify intrafraction motion and assess the efficacy of the different motion management strategies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients were included in the study. At the beginning and end of the scanning protocol, 2 cine-MRI scans were acquired to assess cyclic respiratory motion. In addition, 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo scans were acquired at 4 different time points to assess the slow drifts over 25 minutes. The systematic and random errors owing to intrafraction drift were calculated, as well as the random error induced by respiratory motion. The motion margins were calculated for tumor trailing and respiratory tracking and compared with the margin when no motion compensation would be performed to assess the relative efficacy of each technique. RESULTS: The largest respiratory tumor motion was observed along the caudo-cranial direction with a median 95% maximum amplitude of approximately 12 mm. SigmaDRIFT, sigmaDRIFT, and sigmaRESP were determined to be 1.0 mm 1.8 mm, and 3.8 mm, respectively. Without mechanical immobilization, intrafraction drift accounted for 75% of the total intrafraction motion margin for online midposition-based SBRT treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of intrafraction drift to the total internal motion margin is much larger than periodic respiratory motion. This makes tumor trailing a viable option to consider on the MRI linac because it allows for 3-dimensional MRI acquisitions during beam delivery, which simplifies the introduction of new techniques, such as dose accumulation and online intrafraction replanning.

Background: Dose-guided adaptive radiation therapy (DGART) is the systematic evaluation and adaptation of the dose delivery during treatment for an individual patient. The aim of this study is to define quantitative action levels for DGART by evaluating changes in 3D dose metrics in breast cancer and correlate them with clinical expert evaluation. Material and methods: Twenty-three breast cancer treatment plans were evaluated, that were clinically adapted based on institutional IGRT guidelines. Reasons for adaptation were variation in seroma, hematoma, edema, positioning or problems using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold. Sixteen patients received a uniform dose to the breast (clinical target volume 1; CTV1). Six patients were treated with a simultaneous integrated boost to CTV2. The original plan was copied to the CT during treatment (re-CT) or to the stitched cone-beam CT (CBCT). Clinical expert evaluation of the re-calculated dose distribution and extraction of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were performed. The extreme scenarios were evaluated, assuming all treatment fractions were given to the original planning CT (pCT), re-CT or CBCT. Reported results are mean ± SD. Results: DVH results showed a mean dose (Dmean) difference between pCT and re-CT of -0.4 ± 1.4% (CTV1) and −1.4 ± 2.1% (CTV2). The difference in V95% was −2.6 ± 4.4% (CTV1) and −9.8 ± 8.3% (CTV2). Clinical evaluation and DVH evaluation resulted in a recommended adaptation in 17/23 or 16/23 plans, respectively. Applying thresholds on the DVH parameters: Dmean CTV, V95% CTV, Dmax, mean lung dose, volume exceeding 107% (uniform dose) or 90% (SIB) of the prescribed dose enabled the identification of patients with an assumed clinically relevant dose difference, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 1.0. Re-calculation on CBCT imaging identified the same plans for adaptation as re-CT imaging. Conclusions: Clinical expert evaluation can be related to quantitative DVH parameters on re-CT or CBCT imaging to select patients for DGART.

To enable magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy and facilitate modelling of radiation attenuation in humans, synthetic-CT (sCT) images need to be generated. Considering the application of MR-guided radiotherapy and online adaptive replanning, sCT generation should occur within minutes. This work aims at assessing whether an existing deep learning network can rapidly generate sCT images to be used for accurate MR-based dose calculations in the entire pelvis. A study was conducted on data of 91 patients with prostate, rectal and cervical cancer who underwent external beam radiotherapy acquiring both CT and MRI for patients' simulation. Dixon reconstructed water, fat and in-phase images obtained from a conventional dual gradient-recalled echo sequence were used to generate sCT images. A conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) was trained in a paired fashion on 2D transverse slices of 32 prostate cancer patients. The trained network was tested on the remaining patients to generate sCT images. For 30 patients in the test set, dose recalculations of the clinical plan were performed on sCT images. Dose distributions were evaluated comparing voxel-based dose differences, gamma and dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. The sCT generation required 5.6 s and 21 s for a single patient volume on a GPU and CPU, respectively. On average, sCT images resulted in a higher dose to the target of maximum 0.3%. Results suggest that accurate MR-based dose calculation using sCT images generated with a cGAN trained on prostate cancer patients is feasible for the entire pelvis. The sCT generation was sufficiently fast to be integrated into an MR-guided radiotherapy workflow., Accepted for publication in Physics in Medicine and Biology, in press (2018)

Purpose/Objective: Flank irradiation for Wilms' tumor (WT) is currently performed at our institute using a cone-beam computed tomography-guided volumetric modulated arc (VMATCBCT) workflow. By adding real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance to the treatment, safety margins could be reduced. The study purpose was to quantify the potential reduction of the planning target volume (PTV) margin and its dosimetric impact when using an MRI-guided intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRTMRI) workflow compared to the VMATCBCT workflow. Material/Methods: 4D-CT, MRI and CBCT scans acquired during preparation and treatment of 15 patients, were used to estimate both geometric, motion and patient set-up systematic (∑) and random (σ) errors for VMATCBCT and IMRTMRI workflows. The mean PTV (PTVmean) expansion was calculated using the van Herk formula. Treatment plans were generated using five margin scenarios (PTVmean ± 0, 1 and 2 mm). Furthermore, the IMRTMRI plans were optimized with a 1.5T transverse magnetic field turned-on to realistically model an MRI-guided treatment. Plans were evaluated using dose-volume statistics (p Results: Analysis of ∑ and σ errors resulted in a PTVmean of 5 mm for the VMATCBCT and 3 mm for the IMRTMRI workflows in each orthogonal direction. Target coverage was unaffected by the margin decrease with a mean V95%=100% for all margin scenarios. For the PTVmean, an average reduction of the mean dose to the organs at risk (OARs) was achieved with IMRTMRI compared to VMATCBCT: 3.4 ± 2.4% (pppp Conclusions: Imaging data in children with WT demonstrated that the PTV margin could be reduced isotropically down to 2 mm when using the IMRTMRI compared to the VMATCBCT workflow. The former results in a dose reduction to the OARs while maintaining target coverage.