Search

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS, Hirata's disease) is a rare hypoglycemic disorder characterized by spontaneous hypoglycemia associated with extremely high circulating insulin levels and positive anti-insulin antibody results. Thus far, most cases have been reported in Asian countries, notably Japan, with few cases reported in western countries. As a possible cause, it is associated with the use of drugs containing sulfhydryl radicals, such as captopril. This report refers to a 63-year-old female Brazilian patient with a history of postprandial hypoglycemia. After extensive investigation and exclusion of other causes, her hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia was considered to have likely been induced by captopril. Most cases of IAS are self-limiting. However, dietary management, corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and rituximab have already been used to treat patients with IAS. In our case, after discontinuation of captopril, an initial decrease in insulin autoantibody levels was observed followed by improvement in episodes of hypoglycemia. Although it is a rare disease, IAS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Patients with suspected IAS must be screened for autoimmunity-related drugs for insulin. Initial clinical suspicion of IAS can avoid unnecessary costs associated with imaging examinations and/or invasive surgical procedures.

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of MK-1293 insulin glargine (Mk-Gla; 100 U/mL) with originator insulin glargine, Lantus (Sa-Gla), in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)., Materials and Methods: This phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, 52-week study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02059161) enrolled 508 people with T1DM (HbA1c ≤11.0%; 97 mmol/mol) taking basal and prandial insulin. Participants were randomized 1:1 to once-daily Mk-Gla (n = 245) or Sa-Gla (n = 263). Dose titration of basal insulin was by a pre-breakfast plasma glucose dosing algorithm. The primary efficacy objective was assessment of the non-inferiority of HbA1c change from baseline (margin of 0.40% [4.4 mmol/mol]) for Mk-Gla compared with Sa-Gla over 24 weeks. The primary safety objective was assessment of anti-insulin antibody development over 24 weeks., Results: The least squares (LS) mean HbA1c change from baseline at week 24 was -0.62 (95% CI -0.79, -0.45)% (-6.8 [-8.7, -4.9] mmol/mol) and -0.66 (-0.82, -0.50)% (-7.2 [-9.0, -5.4] mmol/mol) for Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla. The LS mean HbA1c difference was 0.04 (-0.11, 0.19)% (0.4 [-1.2, 2.0] mmol/mol) for Mk-Gla minus Sa-Gla, meeting the primary and secondary objective criteria for non-inferiority and equivalence. Week 24 mean insulin glargine dose for Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla was 0.46 and 0.48 U/kg, respectively. Similarity of HbA1c response and basal insulin dose trajectory persisted over the 52 weeks. Safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin antibody responses, hypoglycaemia, adverse events and body weight, were similar between insulins over the 52-week study duration., Conclusions: Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla exhibited similar efficacy and safety over 52 weeks in people with T1DM. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02059161., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Liraglutide is one of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs; there are only a few reports of liraglutide being used for the treatment of insulin allergy. Furthermore, anti-insulin immunoglobulin G antibodies are occasionally detected in patients with diabetes. Hence, we report a case in which switching to liraglutide therapy ameliorated both the symptoms of insulin allergy with hypereosinophilia and the characteristics of insulin antibodies in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Case Presentation: We present the case of a 70-year-old Japanese man with type 2 diabetes who developed insulin allergy with hypereosinophilia. Anti-insulin antibodies, high glycated hemoglobin levels (approximately 12 %), and high serum insulin levels were detected. Because a change in his insulin treatment was inefficient, treatment with liraglutide to protect residual insulin secretion was started, resulting in improvements in his insulin allergy, serum glycated hemoglobin, insulin, and eosinophil levels. Scatchard plots revealed decreased binding capacity and increased affinity constant for high affinity sites of anti-insulin antibodies., Conclusions: Liraglutide might be useful for treating insulin allergy and anti-insulin antibodies in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Insulin antibodies sometimes cause glucose instability. A 52-year-old male patient was admitted to our department for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. From October 2003, he received insulin treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis and diabetes mellitus, but his hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels gradually reached 8.0% (64 mmol/mol IFCC). In January 2010, insulin glargine and insulin aspart were introduced. In April 2010, the insulin antibody titre rose to >13.6 U/mL. In July 2010, treatment was changed to insulin glargine, metformin and miglitol. In November 2011, a further change to insulin glargine, metformin and sitagliptin was made. The insulin antibody titres gradually decreased, but HbA1c levels remained high. In November 2014, liraglutide and insulin glargine were introduced and the HbA1c levels decreased dramatically to ∼7.5% (58 mmol/mol IFCC) despite increasing insulin antibody titres (from 32.6 to >50.0 U/mL). Liraglutide successfully improved glycaemic instability due to insulin antibodies without modulating plasma insulin levels., (2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.)

The Schwabing Insulin Prophylaxis Trial is a randomised, controlled pilot study designed to examine whether insulin therapy can delay or prevent the clinical onset of Type I diabetes in high risk first degree relatives of people with the disease. First degree relatives of patients with Type I diabetes, who were aged 4 years or more, had an islet cell antibody (ICA) value more than 20 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Units (JDF-U), a reduced first phase insulin response (FPI) to an i.v. glucose tolerance test less than the 5th centile, and a normal oral glucose tolerance test were eligible for the trial. Between January 1989 and October 1995, 1736 relatives of patients with Type I diabetes were screened for ICA. We identified 64 cases (3.7%) with ICA values more than 20 JDF-U. Of ICA positive relatives, 17 (27%) had a low FPI and were eligible for enrolment. Of these 14 agreed to participate, of whom 7 were randomised to the treatment group and 7 to the control group. In the treatment group, human insulin was administered i.v. by continuous infusion for 7 days, followed by daily s. c. injections for 6 months. Intravenous insulin infusions were repeated every 12 months. In the treatment group 3 of the 7 individuals (follow-up from time of eligibility: 2.3 to 7.1 years) and in the control group 6 of the 7 untreated individuals (1.7 to 7.1 years) developed clinical diabetes. Life table analysis showed that clinical onset of Type I diabetes was delayed in insulin-treated subjects compared with control subjects (means+/-SEM diabetes-free survival: 5.0+/-0.9 years vs 2.3+/-0.7 years, p < 0.03). Insulin levels after i.v. glucose increased in the first year of intervention therapy. Titres of ICA, and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase, and tyrosine phosphatase-like protein IA2 remained unchanged. These data suggest that insulin prophylaxis can delay the onset of overt diabetes in high risk relatives. This is encouraging in view of 1) the continuing American Diabetes Prevention Trial, which is currently testing the effect of parenteral insulin in a large nation-wide study and 2) the initiation of pilot trials to determine whether new antigen-specific intervention is more effective in delaying the clinical onset of Type I diabetes.

Objective: To assess immunogenicity of intraperitoneal insulin infusion via implanted pumps by two methods and to evaluate the possible influence of an increased antibody level on metabolic and clinical parameters., Research Design and Methods: We studied insulin antibody levels in 17 type I diabetic patients before and until 24 months after implantation of a programmable pump delivering insulin intraperitoneally. Antibody levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). They were correlated with HbA1c, insulin requirements, free insulin, and the incidence of hypoglycemia., Results: Insulin antibodies increased as soon as the 3rd month after implantation. This increase was sustained throughout the study period (month 0, 25.4 +/- 16.2%; month 3, 41.2 +/- 23.5%; month 12, 45.9 +/- 26%; month 24, 48.7 +/- 25%). The data was correlated with the two assay methods (RIA and ELISA). Postimplantation level was correlated with preimplantation level, which could indicate a predictive value of the latter . No correlation was observed with any metabolic parameters, particularly the number of hypoglycemic episodes., Conclusions: Our results indicate that intraperitoneal insulin administration by implantable programmable pumps leads to an increase of insulin antibodies, which are probably high-affinity antibodies (recognized by both RIA and ELISA). This increase in insulin immunogenicity did not induce significant metabolic consequences, which is reassuring for the future of programmable insulin pumps.

Antibodies specific to human insulin, in sera of Thai diabetic patients and normal healthy individuals, were detected by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, displacement ELISA and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Among 36 insulin-treated patients, the antibodies were detected in 22, 23 and 20 individuals, by RIA, commercial ELISA kit and displacement ELISA, respectively. Among those who had never previously received insulin therapy, RIA showed positive results in 5/11 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and 1/2 patients with fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes (FCPD); but were negative in all 26 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and 30 normal healthy individuals. The commercial ELISA kit could detect such insulin autoantibodies (IAA) in 4/11 IDDM, 3/26 NIDDM, 2/2 FCPD patients and 4/30 normal controls; while the displacement ELISA showed positive IAA detection in 5/11 IDDM, 2/26 NIDDM, 2/2 FCPD and 2/30 normal controls. By using RIA as the 'gold standard', the commercial ELISA kit had 92.86% sensitivity, 87.01% specificity, 88.57% accuracy, 72.22% positive predictive value and 97.10% negative predictive value; while these indices for the displacement ELISA were 85.71%, 90.01%, 89.52%, 77.42% and 94.59%, respectively.

In 20 type I diabetic patients treated with conventional insulin preparations, we measured insulin antibodies and peptide C secretion. Peptide C levels 90 and 120 min after a standard breakfast correlated well with glucosylated Hb levels (r = -0.48 and -0.52, respectively). No correlation with free insulin levels was observed, in spite of a good correlation of the latter with blood glucose levels (r = -0.50 and -0.73, respectively). There was no relation between insulin antibody levels and peptide C or free insulin. Metabolic control was not affected by insulin antibodies. Insulin dose decreased in relation to the duration of the disease and reduction of body weight index and was not correlated to glycosylated Hb levels.