1. Benefit of Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold for Right Breast Cancer When Regional Lymph Nodes Are Irradiated
- Author
-
Gabrielle W. Peters, Christin A. Knowlton, Meena S. Moran, Nicholas Saltmarsh, Andrew Zhang, Suzanne B. Evans, Sarah J. Gao, Martha Picone, Lynn D. Wilson, and Susan A. Higgins
- Subjects
Organs at Risk ,Breast Neoplasms ,Breath Holding ,Right breast ,Breast cancer ,Inspiratory breath ,Unilateral Breast Neoplasms ,Humans ,Medicine ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Lung ,Mean lung dose ,business.industry ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Cancer ,Heart ,Radiotherapy Dosage ,medicine.disease ,Axilla ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,Female ,Lymph Nodes ,Lymph ,business ,Nuclear medicine - Abstract
BACKGROUND Although deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) is routinely used for left-sided breast cancers, its benefits for right-sided breast cancer (rBC) have yet to be established. We compared free-breathing (FB) and DIBH treatment plans for a cohort of rBC undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to determine its potential benefits. METHODS AND MATERIALS rBC patients considered for RNI (internal mammary nodal chains, supraclavicular field, with or without axilla) from October 2017 to May 2020 were included in this analysis. For each patient, FB versus DIBH plans were generated and dose volume histograms evaluated the following parameters: mean lung dose, ipsilateral lung V20/V5 (volumes of lung receiving 20 Gy and 5 Gy, respectively); mean heart dose and heart V5 (volumes of heart receiving 5 Gy); liver V20 absolute /V30 absolute (absolute volume of liver receiving 20 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively), liver Dmax, and total liver volume irradiated (TVIliver). The dosimetric parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were eligible for analysis, comparing 108 FB and DIBH plans. DIBH significantly decreased all lung and liver parameters: mean lung dose (19.7 Gy-16.2 Gy, P < .001), lung V20 (40.7%-31.7%, P < .001), lung V5 (61.2%-54.5%, P < .001), TVIliver (1446 cc vs 1264 cc; P = .006) liver Dmax (50.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy; P = .023), liver V20 (78.8-23.9 cc, P < .001), and liver V30 (58.1-14.6 cc, P < .001) compared with FB. DIBH use did not significantly improve heart parameters, although the V5Heart trended on significance (1.25-0.6, P = .067). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest cohort to date analyzing DIBH for RNI-rBC. Our findings demonstrate significant improvement in all lung and liver parameters with DIBH, supporting its routine consideration for rBC patients undergoing comprehensive RNI.
- Published
- 2022