Search

Copyright of Herzschrittmachertherapie und Elektrophysiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is diagnosed in out-of-hospital VF survivors after comprehensive investigations have excluded structural heart disease or inherited channelopathies. Current guidelines recommend clinical screening of first-degree relatives of IVF survivors, but this approach has not been validated in children. This study aimed to assess the yield of clinical cardiac screening in child first-degree relatives of IVF victims. A retrospective observational study was conducted of all consecutive pediatric first-degree relatives of IVF patients referred to our center between December 2007 and April 2020. Patients underwent systematic evaluation including medical and family history; 12-lead resting, signal-averaged, and ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG); echocardiogram; exercise testing; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; and ajmaline provocation testing. Sixty child first-degree relatives of 32 IVF survivors were included [median follow-up time of 55 months (IQR 27.0–87.0 months); 30 (50%) females]. Eight patients (13.3%) from 6 families (18.8%) received a cardiac diagnosis: long QT syndrome (n = 4); Brugada syndrome (n = 3); and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 1). There were no deaths during follow-up. This study demonstrates a high yield of clinical screening for inherited cardiac disease in child first-degree relatives of IVF survivors. These findings highlight the variable expression of inherited cardiac conditions and the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation in pediatric relatives, even when extensive investigations in the proband have not identified a clear etiology. Moreover, our results support the validity of the investigations proposed by current guidelines in family relatives of IVF survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is a diagnosis of exclusion in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. Although there are clear guidelines on the clinical work-up of SCA survivors, less than one in five patients receives a complete work-up. This increases the chances of erroneously labelling these patients as having IVF, while 10-20% of them have an inherited cardiac condition (ICC). Diagnoses of ICC increase over time due to (additional) deep phenotyping or as a result of spontaneous expression of ICC over time. As SCA survivors can also harbor (likely) pathogenic variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes in the absence of a phenotype, or can have another ICC without a clear cardiac phenotype, the question arises as to whether genetic testing in this group should be routinely performed. Family history (mainly in the case of sudden death) can increase suspicion of an ICC in an SCA victim, but does not add great value when adults underwent a complete cardiological work-up. The diagnosis of ICC has treatment consequences not only for the patient but also for their family. Genetic diagnostic yield does not appear to increase with larger gene panels, but variants of unknown significance (VUS) do. Although VUS can be confusing, careful and critical segregation analysis in the family can be performed when discussed in a multidisciplinary team at a center of expertise with at least a cardiologist as well as a clinical and laboratory geneticist, thereby degrading or promoting VUS. When to introduce genetic testing in SCA survivors remains a matter of debate, but the combination of quick, deep phenotyping with additional genetic testing for the unidentifiable phenotypes, especially in the young, seems preferable., (© 2024. The Author(s).)