Search

There are many types of inhaler device, each with its own characteristics, benefits and limitations. Inhaler device selection should be individualised. Assessment of the patient's inspiratory flow, dexterity, coordination and preferences can help guide selection of a device that the patient can and will use effectively. For patients who require multiple inhaled drugs, prescribing combination inhalers and avoiding the use of more than one type of inhaler device can reduce errors in inhaler technique and improve adherence. Inhaler technique and adherence should be regularly reviewed. Environmental impact of inhalers can be reduced by optimising symptom control to minimise the need for short-acting beta2 agonists, and choosing inhalers with a low carbon footprint. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small airways disease (SAD) in severe asthma (SA) is associated with high disease burden. Effective treatment of SAD could improve disease control. Reduced end-expiratory flows (forced expiratory flow [FEF] 25-75 and FEF 75 ) are considered sensitive indicators of SAD. Inhaled medication should be delivered to the smaller peripheral airways to treat SAD effectively. Aerosol deposition is affected by structural airway changes. Little is known about the effect of SAD on aerosol delivery to the smaller peripheral airways. Functional respiratory imaging (FRI) is a validated technique using 3D reconstructed chest computed tomography (CT) and computational fluid dynamics to predict aerosol deposition in the airways. Aim: This study aims to compare central and peripheral (= small airways) deposition between children with SA and SAD and children with SA without SAD, with different inhaler devices and inhalation profiles. Methods: FRI was used to predict the deposition of beclomethasone/formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI), beclomethasone/formoterol pressurized metered dose inhaler with valved holding chamber (pMDI/VHC), and salbutamol pMDI/VHC for different device-specific inhalation profiles in chest-CT of 20 children with SA (10 with and 10 without SAD). SAD was defined as FEF 25-75 and FEF 75 z-score < -1.645 and forced vital capacity (FVC) z-score > -1.645. No SAD was defined as forced expiratory volume (FEV) 1 , FEF 25-75 , FEF 75 , and FVC z-score > -1.645. The intrathoracic, central, and peripheral airways depositions were determined. Primary outcome was difference in central-to-peripheral (C:P) deposition ratio between children with SAD and without SAD. Results: Central deposition was significantly higher (∼3.5%) and peripheral deposition was lower (2.9%) for all inhaler devices and inhalation profiles in children with SAD compared with children without SAD. As a result C:P ratios were significantly higher for all inhaler devices and inhalation profiles, except for beclomethasone administered through DPI ( p = .073), in children with SAD compared with children without SAD. Conclusion: Children with SA and SAD have higher C:P ratios, that is, higher central and lower peripheral aerosol deposition, than children without SAD. The intrathoracic, central, and peripheral deposition of beclomethasone/formoterol using DPI was lower than using pMDI/VHC.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance, for the administration of fluticasone propionate with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), of two low-tech paperboard spacers versus two commercially available valved holding chambers (VHC)., Methods: According to the Canadian standard CAN/CSA-Z264.1-02, total emitted dose (TED) and aerodynamic size distribution were measured for the pMDI in combination with 4 different spacers: a homemade paper cup spacer, the DispozABLE® paperboard spacer, the AeroChamber Plus® plastic VHC, and the Vortex® aluminium VHC., Results: The two disposable paperboard spacers had a lower TED compared to the aluminium VHC, but delivered more than 2.5 times the dose of fluticasone than the commercial plastic VHC. The 3 antistatic devices (i.e. the aluminium VHC, the paperboard DispozABLE® spacer and the paper cup spacer) delivered a significantly higher dose of fine particles than the less antistatic plastic VHC. Their fine particle fraction was statistically similar to that obtained with pMDI without spacer. This respirable fraction ensures an optimal therapeutic effect. All spacers limited the flow of coarse particles, thus avoiding adverse effects on the trachea and oropharynx., Conclusion: We have shown that inexpensive and low-tech paperboard spacers are interesting alternatives for the administration of aerosols., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Salbutamol is a cornerstone for relieving acute asthma symptoms, typically administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) offer an alternative, but concerns exist whether DPIs provide an effective relief during an obstructive event., Objective: We aimed to show non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler DPI compared to pMDI with spacer in treating methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Applicability of Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler DPI as a reliever was also assessed., Methods: This was a randomized, parallel-group trial in subjects sent to methacholine challenge (MC) test for asthma diagnostics. Participants with at least 20 % decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) were randomized to receive Salbutamol Easyhaler (2 × 200 μg), Ventoline Evohaler with spacer (4 × 100 μg) or Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler (2 × 160/4.5 μg) as a reliever. The treatment was repeated if FEV 1 did not recover to at least -10 % of baseline., Results: 180 participants (69 % females, mean age 46 yrs [range 18-80], FEV 1 %pred 89.5 [62-142] %) completed the trial. Salbutamol Easyhaler was non-inferior to pMDI with spacer in acute relief of bronchoconstriction showing a -0.083 (95 % LCL -0.146) L FEV 1 difference after the first dose and -0.032 (-0.071) L after the last dose. The differences in FEV 1 between Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler and Salbutamol pMDI with spacer were -0.163 (-0.225) L after the first and -0.092 (-0.131) L after the last dose., Conclusion: The study confirms non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler to Ventoline Evohaler with spacer in relieving acute bronchoconstriction, making Easyhaler a sustainable and safe reliever for MC test and supports its use during asthma attacks., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. JK reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis and Orion Pharma and participation on an Advisory Board from GlaxoSmithKline and MSD. VV reports being former employee of Orion Pharma and having received personal consultation and lecture fees from Orion Pharma and having been in sustainability advisory board of Orion Pharma. AT reports payments for lectures or presentations from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline and participation on an Advisory Board from Chiesi. LPM reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Chiesi and Orion Pharma. LV reports research grant from Tuberculosis foundation of Tampere. LL reports personal fees for lecturers and/or advisory board meetings from ALK, Astra Zeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Menarini, Orion Pharma and Sanofi. SL, US and MV are employees of Orion Pharma., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Although valved spacers are the preferred method for administering metered-dose inhaler bronchodilators such as albuterol in pediatric acute asthma, their high cost and their lack of availability have limited their use, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Because of this, it is a common practice to use home-made spacers, although a formal analysis evaluating their cost-effectiveness is lacking. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of home-made spacers compared to commercial valved spacers for delivering bronchodilator therapy in pediatric acute asthma. A decision-analysis model was used to estimate health outcomes and costs of a simulated cohort of pediatric patients treated for acute asthma. Effectiveness parameters were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Cost data were obtained from hospital bills and from the national manual of drug prices in Colombia. The study was carried out from the perspective of the national healthcare system in Colombia, a middle-income country (MIC). The main outcome of the model was avoidance of hospital admission. Base-case analysis showed that compared to commercial valved spacers, administering bronchodilators with home-made spacers results in lower overall treatment costs (US$126.75 vs. US$128.59 average cost per patient) without a significant difference in the probability of hospitalization avoided (0.8500 vs. 0.8500). The present study shows that in Colombia, an MIC, compared with commercial valved spacers, the use of home-made spacers for administering bronchodilator therapy is more cost-effective because it yields a similar probability of hospital admission at lower overall treatment costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to describe the technical aspects and cautions to be observed during the administration of inhaled medications contained in a pressurized inhaler (pMDI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on noninvasive ventilation. This integrative review consisted of 4 phases: (1) search in the literature; (2) consultation with medical societies; (3) research on package inserts and monographs of inhaled drugs; and (4) contact with ventilator, medication and spacer companies. The search for studies was based on keywords and restricted to articles published until December 31, 2019, written in Portuguese and English. Nine articles were selected, including 1 primary study, 6 review studies and 2 studies on experimental ventilation models. Two guidelines were included from the consultation with medical societies, and of the 8 companies contacted, 4 made recommendations regarding the inhalation technique. No information was found on the administration of noninvasive ventilation drugs in package inserts and monographs. Attention should be given to measures that increase the pulmonary deposition of inhaled drugs, such as the use of an air chamber with pMDI, minimization of undesirable air leakage, patient-ventilator synchronization, jet firing in the inspiratory phase and insertion of a leak port in the mask or circuit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metered dose Inhalers (MDIs) are widely used in the management of patients with asthma and choronoc obstractyive polmunary disease (COPD). Studies comparing the efficacy of inhalers versus nebulizers have shown no significant difference (1, 2). Good inhaler technique is essential to improve patient compliance and control of symptom, and diminish side effects. The usual technique is to use 5 tidal breaths. The Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines suggest that patients can take a slow and single breath to inhale the drug or do tidal breathing. The total lung deposition of an inhaled treatment is strongly affected by the speed of inhalation.

Objectives: Inhalation chambers are commonly used for the delivery of aerosol drugs to cats with respiratory disease. The aim of the study was to identify successful cleaning methods for inhalation devices after standardised bacterial contamination. Methods: Spacer devices of two different manufacturers were used: RC Chamber (Cegla Medizintechnik) and Aerokat (Trudell Medical International). The bacterial contamination was performed using Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Previously marked areas of the chamber were contaminated with 50 μl of bacterial solution, containing between 2.2 ×105 and 2.1 ×108 colony-forming units/ml each. After cleaning the devices as recommended by each manufacturer (RC Chamber: special microwave cleaning bag [n = 5] or boiling water with liquid dish detergent for 15 mins [n = 5]; Aerokat: rinsing in a solution of lukewarm water and liquid dish detergent for 15 mins), chambers were air-dried for 24 h and samples for bacterial culture were taken from three defined areas. Sample material was applied on Müller–Hinton agar plates and subsequently incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Results: Bacterial contamination was not detected in any of the examined inhalation devices using the recommended cleaning methods. Conclusions and relevance: If inhalation chambers are cleaned following the manufacturers' recommendations, successful bacterial decontamination can be expected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The static charge on the plastic body of spacers attracts drug aerosols, reducing the drug available for inhalation from plastic spacers. Some instructions exist to decrease the electric charge on plastic spacers, such as priming them with salbutamol (20 puffs) before use. This study investigates whether priming plastic spacer devices with this method can improve the bronchodilator test result. This study included children with stable mild to moderate asthma. All subjects underwent two pulmonary function tests to evaluate their bronchodilator response on separate days at 24-48 hours intervals. On each day, spirometry was performed at the baseline and 15 min after inhalation of four puffs of salbutamol (100 μg/puff) through either a primed or a new spacer. The change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after inhaling salbutamol was the primary outcome measure. When the patients used a new spacer, the mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) were 89.56±11.95 and 86.17±6.87, respectively. However, the mean increase in FEV1 from the baseline was 10.87±8.99 in this group. On the other hand, with the primed spacer, the respective mean baseline FEV1 and FEV1/FVC values were 89.41±12.14 and 85.49±6.76, while it increased by 12.1±11.01 after salbutamol inhalation. There were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the variation in FEV1 before and after bronchodilator use via a new spacer or primed spacer. Priming new plastic spacers with 20 puffs of salbutamol did not cause additional bronchodilation in asthmatic children, suggesting this practice is inefficient in clinics.

This paper presents an innovative approach to the design optimization of valved holding chambers (VHCs), crucial devices for aerosol drug delivery. We present the design of an optimal cylindrical VHC body and introduce a novel valve based on particle impaction theory. The research combines computational simulations and physical experiments to assess the performance of various VHCs, with a special focus on the deposition patterns of medication particles within these devices. The methodology incorporates both experimental and simulation approaches to validate the reliability of the simulation. Emphasis is placed on the deposition patterns observed on the VHC walls and the classification of fine and large particles for salbutamol sulfate particles. The study reveals the superior efficacy of our valve design in separating particles compared to commercially available VHCs. In standard conditions, our valve design allows over 95% of particles under 7 μm to pass through while effectively filtering those larger than 8 μm. The optimized body design accomplishes a 60% particle mass flow fraction at the outlet and an average particle size reduction of 58.5%. When compared numerically in terms of size reduction, the optimal design outperforms the two commercially available VHCs selected. This study provides valuable insights into the optimization of VHC design, offering significant potential for improved aerosol drug delivery. Our findings demonstrate a new path forward for future studies, aiming to further optimize the design and performance of VHCs for enhanced pulmonary drug delivery., (Copyright © 2024 by ASME.)

Objective: to identify which Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler with spacer inhalation techniques have been used in patients with asthma. Method: this was an integrative review, conducted in January 2018, in the US National Library of Medicine and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases. 14 articles, published between January 2011 and December 2017, which contained the description of the sequence of inhalation technique steps, were selected. Results: the articles predominantly studied individuals aged 14 years or over and justified the adoption of the steps of the inhalation technique from literature references. The steps indicated by each article were reviewed by experts and a quantification of those most cited was performed, with 15 steps being defined. Conclusion: the synthesis of the knowledge generated can help healthcare providers in the proper management of asthma, since it provides evidence related to the efficacy of each step.

Valved holding chambers (VHCs) reduce the need for inhalation-actuation coordination with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), reduce oropharyngeal drug deposition and may improve lung deposition and clinical outcomes compared to pMDIs used alone. While VHCs are thus widely advocated for use in vulnerable patient groups within clinical and regulatory guidelines, there is less consensus as to whether the performance differences between different VHCs have clinical implications. This review evaluates the VHC literature, in particular the data pertaining to large-versus small-volume chambers, aerosol performance with a VHC adjunct versus a pMDI alone, charge dissipative/conducting versus non-conducting VHCs, and facemasks, to ascertain whether potentially meaningful differences between VHCs exist. Inconsistencies in the literature are examined and explained, and relationships between in vitro and in vivo data are discussed. A particular focus of this review is the AeroChamber Plus(r) Flow-Vu(r) Anti-static VHC, the most recent iteration of the AeroChamber VHC family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A pressurized metered dose inhaler combined with a valved holding chamber (pMDI+VHC) is used to prevent upper airway complications and improve the efficiency of inhaled drug delivery; however, the aerodynamic behavior of the released particles has not been well investigated. This study aimed at clarifying the particle release profiles of a VHC using simplified laser photometry. Methods: An inhalation simulator comprised a computer-controlled pump and a valve system that withdrew aerosol from a pMDI+VHC using a jump-up flow profile. A red laser illuminated the particles leaving VHC and evaluated the intensity of the light reflected by the released particles. Results: The data suggested that the output (OPT) from the laser reflection system represented particle concentration rather than particle mass, and the latter was calculated as OPT × instantaneous withdrawn flow (WF). Summation of OPT hyperbolically decreased with flow increment, whereas summation of OPT × instantaneous flow was not influenced by WF strength. Particle release trajectories consisted of three phases, namely increment with a parabolic curve, flat, and decrement with exponential decay phases. The flat phase appeared exclusively at low-flow withdrawal. These particle release profiles suggest the importance of early phase inhalation. The hyperbolic relationship between WF and particle release time revealed the minimal required withdrawal time at an individual withdrawal strength. Conclusions: The particle release mass was calculated as laser photometric output × instantaneous flow. Simulation of the released particles suggested the importance of early phase inhalation and predicted the minimally required withdrawal time from a pMDI+VHC.

Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa que objetivou analisar a produção científica, publicada entre 1999 e 2010, referente ao uso e eficácia de dispositivos inalatórios acoplados a espaçadores no tratamento da asma. A seleção dos estudos foi realizada nas bases de dados: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online/Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (MEDLINE/BVS) e Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) e resultou em 20 artigos científicos. Foram evidenciadas diversas vantagens na utilização dos espaçadores, entre elas destaca-se a reversão mais rápida do broncoespasmo durante as crises agudas, a redução no tempo de preparo e administração das medicações, a menor evidência de efeitos colaterais e a redução de custos, especialmente quando se opta pelo uso de espaçadores artesanais. Desse modo, profissionais atuantes em programas de controle da asma, especialmente os enfermeiros envolvidos nesses serviços, precisam estar aptos a orientar os pacientes e relatar os benefícios da utilização dos espaçadores no tratamento farmacológico da asma. ABSTRACT This integrative review aimed to analyze the scientific production published between 1999 and 2010 on the use and effectiveness of inhaler devices connected to spacers in the treatment of asthma. Selection of studies in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online/Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (MEDLINE/BVS) and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases yielded 20 scientific articles. Use of spacers was shown to offer a number of advantages, particularly more rapid relief of bronchospasm in acute attacks, reduced drug preparation and administration times, fewer side-effects and lower costs, especially with homemade spacers. Accordingly, personnel – especially nurses – involved in asthma control programs must be capacitated to advise patients and to report the benefits of using spacers in pharmacological treatment of asthma. RESUMEN Se trata de una revisión integradora que objetivó analizar la producción científica, publicada entre 1999 y 2010, respecto al uso y efectividad de los dispositivos inhaladores acoplados a espaciadores en el tratamiento de la asma. La selección de los estudios he sido realizada en las bases de datos: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online/Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (MEDLINE/BVS) y Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) y resultó en 20 artículos científicos. Fueron evidenciadas diversas ventajas en la utilización de los espaciadores, entre ellas se destaca la inversión más rápida del broncoespasmo durante los ataques agudos, la reducción del tiempo de preparación y administración de medicamentos, la más mínima evidencia de efectos secundarios y la reducción de costos, especialmente cuando se opta por el uso de espaciadores de fabricación artesanal. Así, los profesionales que participan en programas de control de la asma, sobre todo los enfermeros envueltos en esos servicios, deben ser capaces de enseñar y informar los beneficios del uso de los espaciadores en el tratamiento farmacológico de la asma.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar se o uso de salbutamol inalatório através de inalador dosimetrado acoplado a espaçadores de grande volume com tratamento antiestático na espirometria com prova broncodilatadora modifica os resultados do teste quando comparado à técnica usual (sem espaçador). MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo envolvendo 24 pacientes, com idades entre 18 e 45 anos e suspeita clínica de asma, atendidos no Ambulatório de Pneumologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, em Belo Horizonte (MG). Os pacientes foram submetidos a duas espirometrias com prova broncodilatadora realizadas com e sem o uso de espaçador de grande volume. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa na variação do VEF1 antes e após o uso de broncodilatador entre as duas técnicas (ΔVEF1 média = 0,01 L; IC95%: -0,05 a 0,06; p = 0,824). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as duas técnicas em relação ao resultado qualitativo da prova broncodilatadora (p = 1,00). Houve concordância dos resultados da prova broncodilatadora entre as técnicas (coeficiente kappa = 0,909; p < 0,005). CONCLUSÕES: De acordo com os resultados deste estudo, a utilização de espaçadores de grande volume não modificou de forma significativa os resultados da prova broncodilatadora.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of inhaled albuterol via a metered-dose inhaler with a large-volume spacer with antistatic treatment modifies the bronchodilator test results when compared with the usual technique (no spacer). METHODS: A prospective study involving 24 patients, 18-45 years of age, clinically suspected of having asthma, and under treatment at the Outpatient Pulmonary Clinic of the Federal University of Minas Gerais Hospital das Clínicas, located in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. All of the patients underwent two bronchodilator tests: one with and one without the use of a large-volume spacer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the variation of FEV1 prior to and after bronchodilator use between the two techniques (mean ΔFEV1 = 0.01 L; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.06; p = 0.824). No statistically significant difference was found between the two techniques regarding the qualitative results on the bronchodilator test (p = 1.00). There was concordance between the techniques in terms of the bronchodilator test results (kappa coefficient = 0.909; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, the use of large-volume spacers does not significantly modify bronchodilator test results.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of a theoretical and practical guidance on knowledge of pediatricians regarding the use of metered dose inhalers with spacers. To identify major deficiencies, correct them and train these physicians on the correct use of the devices. Methods: Pediatricians who participated in a theoretical-practical program focusing on the use of inhaler devices answered a questionnaire with five questions about the use of these devices before and after the program. A comparison of the scores obtained in the pre- and post-training tests was performed by Wilcoxon test for related samples, and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted. Results: Twenty pediatricians performed pre- and post-training tests. The performance of pediatricians in the post-training test was significantly better than baseline (p

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os conhecimentos sobre o uso e manejo de inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados entre profissionais de um hospital pediátrico terciário. MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas avaliações sobre o conhecimento do uso de inaladores pressurizados dosimetrados através de questionários teóricos e práticos, com médicos, fisioterapeutas, enfermeiras e auxiliares de enfermagem, atribuindo-se uma nota de 0 a 10 para cada avaliação. Calcularam-se as medianas das notas obtidas pelos profissionais de cada categoria, as questões com maiores e menores índices de erros, e foi feita a comparação descritiva do desempenho das diversas categorias profissionais. A análise estatística foi feita através do método de Kruskal-Wallis de comparação de medianas. Também foi realizada a análise através de regressão logística múltipla seqüencial. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 30 médicos residentes ou estagiários de pediatria, 23 médicos assistentes, 29 fisioterapeutas, 33 enfermeiras e 31 auxiliares de enfermagem. Os médicos residentes, fisioterapeutas e médicos assistentes obtiveram desempenho significativamente superior aos dos enfermeiros e auxiliares de enfermagem. Apenas os médicos residentes obtiveram mediana superior a 6. CONCLUSÕES: O conhecimento a respeito do uso de inaladores dosimetrados entre os profissionais de saúde da instituição é insatisfatório, principalmente entre enfermeiros e auxiliares de enfermagem, diretamente envolvidos na aplicação prática dos inaladores dosimetrados.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health professionals working at a tertiary pediatric hospital in terms of their knowledge regarding the practical use of metered-dose inhalers. METHODS: Practical and written tests on the use of metered-dose inhalers were applied to physicians, physical therapists, nurses and nursing assistants. A score from 0 to 10 was assigned to each evaluation, and median scores were calculated for each professional category. Questions with higher and lower correct values were identified, and a descriptive comparison was made regarding the performance of the various professional categories. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis method for comparison of medians. A sequential logistic multiple regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 30 resident physicians or interns in the pediatrics department, 23 attending physicians, 29 physical therapists, 33 nurses and 31 nursing assistants were evaluated. Resident physicians, physical therapists and attending physicians performed significantly better than did nurses and nursing assistants. Only resident physicians had a median score greater than 6. CONCLUSIONS: The health professionals evaluated, particularly the nurses and nursing assistants, who are directly involved in the practical use of metered-dose inhalers, possess insufficient knowledge regarding the use of such inhalers.

Studies show the delivery of inhaled medications is maximized when a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer is utilized. Our residents expressed concern with their knowledge of MDIs and spacers. This study was designed to address those concerns. Residents were given a 12-question pre-intervention, self-assessment questionnaire that explored their overall knowledge and comfort in utilizing MDI with spacers. Participants then received educational intervention via multimedia videos and a demonstration of proper use of MDI with spacer. Participants were given the same questionnaire immediately following the education and again 3 months later. Improvement was significant (P < .05) for each element studied as derived from the 12 questions. Improvement remained significant when these variables were assessed in the 3-month follow-up. In this study, we successfully improved the ability of our residents to deliver quality care by improving their knowledge and confidence in utilizing MDIs with spacers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJETIVO: Verificar a eficácia, eventos adversos e custo do tratamento da crise aguda de asma, utilizando diferentes dispositivos inalatórios. MÉTODOS: Estudo randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado com placebo. Foi utilizado salbutamol em nebulizador, inalador dosimetrado com espaçadores industrial e artesanal e inalador em pó. As avaliações foram feitas em 0, 20, 40 e 60 minutos, seguidas da aplicação de salbutamol e placebo em outro dispositivo. Foram avaliadas 40 crianças em crise aguda de asma, com média de idade = 11±3,5 anos. Utilizou-se escore clínico e função pulmonar, e foram verificados eventos adversos. Foram calculados gastos com o medicamento e o dispositivo inalatório. RESULTADOS: O escore clínico e a variação no volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo foram semelhantes entre os grupos ao final do estudo. Foi encontrada uma variação maior na freqüência cardíaca com o uso de nebulizador (35%) do que nos grupos que fizeram uso do espaçador industrial (15%) e do inalador em pó (17%), e também entre os espaçadores artesanal e industrial, 28 e 15%, respectivamente (p = 0,004). O nebulizador e o espaçador artesanal provocaram mais tremores (p = 0,02). O custo do tratamento por paciente foi maior nos grupos nebulizador e espaçador industrial, R$ 22,31 e R$ 16,58, respectivamente (p = 0,0001). CONCLUSÕES: O nebulizador foi o mais caro e consumiu mais droga para apresentar a mesma eficácia. O espaçador artesanal foi o mais barato. No entanto, apresentou mais eventos adversos do que o espaçador industrial e o inalador em pó. O espaçador industrial foi tão caro quanto o nebulizador, porém mais seguro. O inalador em pó foi mais barato e apresentou menos tremores, mas taquicardia semelhante ao espaçador artesanal.OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy, side effects, and cost of treatment of acute asthma attacks, using different inhaler devices. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Salbutamol was administered via a nebulizer, a metered-dose inhaler (attached to a commercially available spacer device), a homemade non-valved spacer device, or a dry powder inhaler. Assessments were made at zero, 20, 40 and 60 minutes, followed by the application of salbutamol and placebo with another device. Forty children (mean age of 11±3.5 years) with acute asthma attacks, were evaluated. Clinical score, forced expiratory volume in one second and side effects were analyzed. The costs for medication and spacer devices were calculated. RESULTS: There is no difference between groups regarding clinical score and variation of forced expiratory volume in one second. There was a major variation in the heart rate response to the nebulizer (35%) compared to the commercially available spacer and dry powder inhaler (15 and 17%) and between the homemade spacer and the commercially available spacer (28 and 15%) (p = 0.004). The nebulizer and homemade spacer caused more tremor (p = 0.02). The cost of treatment was higher for the nebulizer and commercially available spacer (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The nebulizer was more expensive and used more medicine, showing the same efficiency. The homemade spacer was cheaper, but presented more side effects. The commercially available spacer was as expensive as the nebulizer, although safer. The dry powder inhaler was cheaper, but, just as the homemade spacer, it also caused tachycardia.

Aerosol delivery equipment used to administer inhaled medications includes the nebulizer, positive expiratory pressure devices added to the nebulizer, and valved holding chambers (spacers). These devices are semi-critical medical devices, and as such, infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines recommend that they be cleaned, disinfected, rinsed with sterile water, and air-dried. There is confusion surrounding the care of aerosol devices because of inconsistencies in the various published IPC guidelines, lack of a standard of practice among institutions and respiratory therapists (RTs), and manufacturer's instructions for use of these devices are not always compatible with guidelines or practice. Challenges lie in awareness of IPC guidelines and establishing a standard for the care of aerosol delivery devices among all stakeholders/manufacturers, governments, vendors, and users. The latest IPC guideline from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, reviewed and endorsed by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control, has a recommendation for disposable nebulizers and a recommendation for reusable nebulizers. Reusable nebulizers should be cleaned, disinfected, rinsed with sterile water (if using a cold disinfectant), and air-dried between uses. The mouthpiece/mask of disposable nebulizers should be wiped with an alcohol pad, the residual volume should be rinsed out with sterile water after use, and the nebulizer should be replaced every 24 h. The RT plays a significant and responsible role in providing and teaching aerosol therapy to patients. The RT and all stakeholders need to work together to provide a standard of care for the safe use of aerosol delivery devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic respiratory diseases are prevalent medical conditions in dogs and cats requiring lifelong treatment. Mainstay of therapy for chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases are glucocorticoids. Concurrent treatment with bronchodilators may be necessary to control clinical signs sufficiently. Due to the successful use in people as well as subsequent reduction of adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy, inhalative therapy has become increasingly important in veterinary medicine as well. Primarily spacers or valved holding chambers, in combination with metered dose inhalers, are used in dogs and cats. The technical properties of these devices, as well as their use and maintenance will be described in the following article. Furthermore, the existing literature regarding efficacy of inhalative medications for therapy of chronic inflammatory airway diseases in dogs and cats will be summarized., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Introduction Inhaled therapy using a metered-dose inhaler ( MDI) with attached valved holding chamber has been increasingly recognized as the optimal method for delivering bronchodilators for asthma treatment. However, mainly due to the high cost of these valved holding chambers in many developing countries, the use of non-valved spacers is frequent, despite the scarce evidence that supports their efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator response to albuterol administered by MDI with and without a valved spacer. Methods In a randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover clinical trial, we analyzed 31 stable asthmatic children (6-18 yrs of age) on two consecutive days, who were randomly assigned to receive 100 μg of albuterol MDI through either a locally produced valved spacer or a non-valved spacer. The next day, a crossover treatment was employed through the use of the other spacer. Spirometry was recorded before and after each albuterol administration. Results As we were not able to identify any sequence or carryover effect, we tested for treatment effects in both periods. No significant differences in the absolute change in FEV1 (0.20 ± 0.17 vs. 0.18 ± 0.16, p = 0.63), FVC (0.07 ± 0.13 vs. 0.07 ± 0.16, p = 0.88), or MMEF (0.49 ± 0.31 vs. 0.43 ± 0.39, p = 0.53) after bronchodilator administration were found between the use of valved and non-valved spacers. Conclusions In stable asthmatic children, albuterol administered through MDI using a non-valved spacer produces a bronchodilator response similar to that of a spacer with a valve that requires an inhalatory opening pressure (with flows between 2 and 32 l/min) that even toddlers with bronchial obstruction can easily generate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology / Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia is the property of Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a theoretical and practical guidance on knowledge of pediatricians regarding the use of metered dose inhalers with spacers. To identify major deficiencies, correct them and train these physicians on the correct use of the devices. Methods: Pediatricians who participated in a theoreticalpractical program focusing on the use of inhaler devices answered a questionnaire with five questions about the use of these devices before and after the program. A comparison of the scores obtained in the pre- and post-training tests was performed by Wilcoxon test for related samples, and a significance level of 0.05 was adopted. Results: Twenty pediatricians performed pre- and post-training tests. The performance of pediatricians in the post-training test was significantly better than baseline (p<0.001). Conclusion: A brief orientation program for pediatricians significantly improved their knowledge on the use of metered-dose inhalers with spacers, which may translate into an improvement in quality and quantity of prescriptions of these devices in clinical practice. The questions with higher rates of errors in the pre-training test were the questions about the waiting time between two sprays in successive applications and about the correct way to attach the inhaler to the spacer, both with high levels of success in the post-training test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Dysphonia is one of the most common side effects of patients who use corticosteroid inhalers. The aim of this study was to investigate, prospectively, the occurrence of dysphonia in patients who used corticosteroid inhalers. Methods: Outpatients aged 18 years or older initially treated with inhaled corticosteroids were recruited. All patients were prescribed budesonide/formoterol. Questionnaires, perceptual studies, and acoustic analysis were performed five times during the study: at study entry and after 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Videostroboscopy was performed at study entry and at 12 weeks. The data collected were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance tests and Wilcoxon''s signed rank test (P <0.01). Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and 29 patients (M:F=19:10) completed the study. Seven patients reported that they had problems with their voice; however, there were no statistically significant changes in the perceptual studies or the acoustic analysis. The videostroboscopy showed that “injection” and “increase of mucus” significantly increased by week 12. Vocal fold bowing was not noted in any of the patients. Conclusions: The results of this study showed no significant voice changes in patients using corticosteroid inhalers over a period of 3 months. However, minor mucosal changes were found on videostroboscopy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Vella C, Grech V. Assessment of use of spacer devices for inhaled drug delivery to asthmatic children.Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2005.© 2005 Blackwell MunksgaardIn the treatment of bronchial asthma, inhaled therapy with both bronchodilators and corticosteroids represents the basis for acute and long-term management. Drug therapy in asthma is predominantly by pressurized metered dose inhalers. The impact of treatment on the disease morbidity and mortality depends to a large extent on appropriate delivery of drug to the lungs by means of a spacer device. We performed an audit on spacer use in 200 children and showed that 99% owned a spacer, 2% owned but did not use their spacer, 11% were using a spacer which was not ideal for their age, 17% had a poor technique, and 24% were not following the recommendations given on previous visits to wash the spacer only with a soapy solution. Although physicians frequently associate poor control of asthma with inadequate doses of drugs, many factors must be considered before increasing the dose of inhaled medications to children. We should all ensure that the drugs we prescribe are delivered in the best possible manner, thus improving control of asthma, reducing side effects and offering a more cost-effective therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]