9 results on '"Ingrida Jakubavičienė"'
Search Results
2. The Colonization Mission of Lithuanian Germans in 1942-1944: a Present from Germany or a Shot in the Eye? - Rec.: Arthur Hermann. Litauendeutsche als Kolonisten in Litauen 1942-1944. Annaberger Annalen. Nr. 17, 2009, S. 237-284
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
History (General) and history of Europe - Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The role of Nazi organizations in German repatriation from the Baltic states (1939-1941)
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
History (General) and history of Europe - Abstract
In 1939 the Baltic states became the victims of cruel Hitler and Stalin agreements. Hitler and Stalin agreed that the German minority from the Baltic states would repatriate to Germany. Since 1939 till 1944 more than one million Germans were forced to leave over 40 states and settle down in Germany. In 1923, in Lithuania, there lived 28 thousand 671 Germans or 1.5 percent of the population. In 1940, there were 36 thousand Germans. The number of Germans increased because of Nazi agitation, then Lithuanians changed their nationality into German. In Latvia in 1930, there lived about 70 thousand, and in Estonia—16 thousand Germans. In 1939, more than 50 thousand Germans repatriated from Latvia, and about 13 thousand 700 Germans from Estonia. In 1940, again 18 thousand Germans were forced to leave Estonia and Latvia. The repatriation from Lithuania was executed in the winter of 1941; more than 50 thousand Germans and Lithuanians left the country. German historians ascribed the preparation for repatriation to the German community. In fact, the German community was directed by local Nazi organizations and its leaders. German historians agree that the news from Berlin about the German repatriation was first given to the leaders of the Nazi movement in the Baltic states. Although there are some historical researches, nobody noticed the important role played by the Nazi organizations during the German repatriation. The leaders of the Nazi movement in the Baltic states were at the same time the leaders of the German community. The Nazi movement had thousands of members, it received instructions and financial support from Berlin. German historians made an impression that the German community obeyed Hitler's order and did its best to leave the country as quickly as possible. The German Nazi movement (Bewegung) was especially active in Latvia, led by Erhard Kroeger. The Nazi organization in Estonia was directed by Oskar Lutz and Baron Wrangel, the president of the German community. On the 25th of September 1939, E. Kroeger visited Hitler in his staff in Poland. E. Kroeger informed Hitler about the political situation in Latvia and asked him to rescue the Baltic Germans. During the secret negotiations between Hitler and Stalin, the question of Germans in the Baltic states was discussed too. On the 2nd of October, the leaders of the Baltic Nazi organizations were informed about Hitler's decision to transfer the German minority from Estonia and Latvia to Germany. On the 6th of October, Hitler officially proclaimed the repatriation from the Baltic states. The "Rigasche Rundschau" published the proclamation of E. Kroeger about the preparation for the repatriation. In three weeks, the Germans abdicated their previous citizenship, transferred their personal property to special German institutions, and with small luggage, left the country. In autumn of 1939, the Nazi organization Kulturverband in Lithuania also started preparation for German repatriation. But the negotiations with Lithuanian authorities did not start. After secret agreements between Hitler and Stalin, Lithuania should be handed to the Soviets. The German and Soviet negotiations started in 1940 after the Soviets occupied Lithuania. Although Hitler did not proclaim the German repatriation from Lithuania, practically the German minority was prepared for it. Berlin ordered Kulturverband to give real figures about the German minority in Lithuania. The leaders of Kulturverband, R. Kosmann, K. Cerpinski, O. Reichard, von der Ropp, and E. Klug controlled the community, spread the information about repatriation, and followed the instructions from Berlin. The leaders of Kulturverband were told about the place where the German minority from Lithuania would be settled down. In comparison with the repatriation from Latvia and Estonia, the Lithuanian German minority experienced hardship and suffered losses because the preparation continued for about two years (since October 1939 till March of 1941). Nazi organizations in the Baltic states fulfilled the instructions of the German SS and other institutions: made registration of Germans and their property, gave new documents for the repatriates, and spread the information. Nazi organizations in the Baltic states helped German institutions execute the repatriation in a short time.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Sport and policy. German Sports organisations in Klaipėda region in 1923-1939
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
History (General) and history of Europe - Abstract
Since 1920 national European countries made their efforts to support their national policy and it caused problems among national minorities and they started actions in order to keep their national identity. In Klaipėda region there were over 65 thousand Germans. There they had a number of sport clubs and cultural, political, religious organizations. In 1923 Klaipėda region was appended to Lithuania but Germans never abandoned their revanchist sentiments to return the region to Germany. Since 1933 as Hitler came into power in Germany, Germans in Klaipėda started Nazi policy. The leaders of sports clubs were members of Nazi organizations and they started military training in the clubs, some sportsmen became shock troops. The German sport organizations showed a clear political support for National Socialism and Hitler's policy in Germany. In 1934 Nazi organizations in Klaipėda were closed and their leaders were imprisoned for illegal work, so the Germans decided to continue Nazi policy in legal organizations, such as sport clubs. German sport clubs in Klaipėda had a big number of members (in 1931 - 28 clubs with 2199 members, in 1936 - 52 clubs with 2907 members, in 1938 - 75 clubs and more than 3000 members), a lot of various sport clubs, good material basis and financial support from Germany. German sport clubs wanted to stay apart from Lithuanian teams. German sportsmen competed only among their clubs or with clubs in Germany. The leaders of German sport organizations even refused to send German sportsmen to an international sport tournament to represent Lithuania. Such a behavior caused some conflicts between German sport clubs and Lithuanian authorities. Every effort of Lithuanian Palace of Physical Culture (Kūno kultūros rūmai) to make German clubs observe Lithuanian laws was unsuccessful. Every time the resistance of German sport clubs grew stronger. At the end of the conflict with Lithuanian authorities in 1938 the German leading sport organization „Sportbund" proclaimed its isolation from Lithuanian authorities. In general German sport clubs in Klaipėda region since 1930s ignored Lithuanian sport clubs, refused to play and compete with Jewish sport clubs, and demonstrated chauvinism. In Lithuania there were about 30 thousand Germans, they had only two sport clubs: „K.S.K. Kultus" in Kaunas and „Sportverein" in Kybartai. Both were loyal to Lithuanian authorities and participated in Lithuanian competitions. These clubs were quite in a long distance from Klaipėda region, they had a small number of members and received neither political nor financial support from Germany.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Pasirodė išsami JAV lietuvių išeivijos ryšių su Lietuva apžvalga
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Tarpukario Lietuvos įvykiai ir žmonės žvalgo atsiminimuose
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Sofijos Smetonienės visuomeninė veikla emigracijoje JAV (1941–1968 m.)
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
Visuomeninė veikla ,Jungtinės Amerikos Valstijos (United States of America ,JAV ,USA) ,Amerikos Valstijos ,S. Smetonienė ,President Antanas Smetona ,Lithuanian community ,Lietuva (Lithuania) ,Lietuva ,Lietuvių bendruomenė ,Tarptautinis saugumas / International security ,Vokietija (Germany) ,Sofija Smetonienė ,Antanas Smetona ,Migracija / Migration ,prezidentas - Abstract
Straipsnis parengtas remiantis išlikusia Sofijos Smetonienės korespondencija, JAV lietuvių išeivijos spauda ir Lietuvos centriniame valstybės archyve saugomais Lietuvos pasiuntinybės Vašingtone bei konsulatų Niujorke ir Čikagoje veiklos dokumentais. Jie padeda plačiau išanalizuoti prezidentienės S. Smetonienės labai įvairiapusiškas veiklas emigracijoje JAV 1941–1968 metais. Remiantis šiais šaltiniais galime teigti, jog S. Smetonienė visą laiką buvusi Prezidento Antano Smetonos pagrindine bendražyge ir rėmėja, tai tęsė ir emigracijoje. 1941 m. kovo 10 d. A. Smetona atvykęs į Niujorką buvo sutiktas kaip Lietuvos Prezidentas egzilyje. Kartu su juo atvykusi žmona Sofija tebevaidino prezidentienės vaidmenį kartu su vyru oficialiuose renginiuose atstovaudami nepriklausomą Lietuvą. Smetonų gyvenimas JAV buvo pilnas psichologinės įtampos, baimės, nesutarimų su vietinių lietuvių išeivių politinėmis srovėmis. Tik iš žmonos Sofijos rašytų laiškų galima susidaryti tikresnį vaizdą, kokiomis sąlygomis jie gyveno emigracijoje. Po prezidento žūties 1944 m. sausio 9 d. Klivlande S. Smetonienė atstovavo prezidentą perskaitydama jo parengtą kalbą 1944 m. vasario 6 d. įvykusiame Amerikos lietuvių seime. Našle tapusi S. Smetonienė išsaugojo oficialų prezidentienės statusą ir Klivlando lietuvių bendruomenėje atliko gana svarbų vaidmenį, rėmė dešimtis Vokietijos DP stovykloje gyvenusių lietuvių. Ji palaikė ryšius su Lietuvos konsulais JAV ir kitais lietuvių išeivijos veikėjais. Lietuvos prezidentienės vardą ir įvaizdį ne kartą išnaudojo JAV spauda straipsniuose apie sovietų pavergtas Baltijos šalis. Savo darbais S. Smetonienė kasdieną sau ir kitiems stengėsi įrodyti, jog prezidento šeimos pasitraukimas iš sovietų okupuotos Lietuvos buvo prasmingas sprendimas. This article is based on the extant correspondence of Sofija Smetonienė; reports in the Lithuanian-language press published in the U.S.; and documents in the Lithuanian Central State Archives concerning the activities of the Lithuanian Embassy in Washington, D.C. and Lithuanian consulates in New York and Chicago. All these sources afford a view of Sofija Smetonienė’s multifaceted activities in the emigration from 1941 to 1968. When President Antanas Smetona arrived in New York on March 10, 1941, he was greeted as the Lithuanian President in exile. Together with his wife Sofija they both represented Lithuania at official functions. But their life in America was full of psychological tension, fear, and disagreements with the political currents dominant in local Lithuanian community life. It is only from the letters written by Sofija Smetonienė that we can reconstruct a more accurate picture of the conditions under which the President and his wife lived. After his death on January 9, 1944 in Cleveland, she stood in for the President by reading the speech he had prepared for the Lithuanian-American Congress on February 6, 1944. Having become a widow Sofija Smetonienė preserved her unofficial status as the President’s wife. As an active member of the Lithuanian community in Cleveland she materially supported dozens of Lithuanians still living in DP camps in Germany and kept in touch with Lithuania’s consuls in the United States as well as Lithuanian-American community activists. Her name and image often cropped up in U. S. news reports on the Soviet-occupied Baltic States. Sofija Smetonienė incessantly tried to demonstrate through her work that the withdrawal of the President’s family from Soviet-occupied Lithuania was a meaningful decision.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. 'We want home to the reich'. The analogies in the issues related to Germans in Klaipėda region and Sudetenland in the axis of Lithuanian-Czechoslovakian policy in the 1920s–1930s
- Author
-
Dalia Bukelevičiūtė and Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
Lietuva (Lithuania) ,lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe ,lcsh:D ,Klaipėda. Klaipėdos kraštas (Klaipeda region) ,Čekijos Respublika (Czech Republic) - Abstract
Pursuing the analysis of issues related to Germans in Klaipėda region and Sudetenland in the axis of Lithuanian-Czechoslovakian policy in the 1920s- 1930s, the authors made use of Lithuanian and Czech archives, documents and publications as well as historical researches. The Lithuanian government carefully observed the policy of Czechoslovakia exercised towards the German minority in Sudetenland and implemented similar practices in Klaipėda region. The article discloses what impact reports of Lithuanian diplomats in Prague, London, Paris and other European capitals had on the decisions of the Lithuanian government. The research based on archival documents helped reveal which decisions the Lithuanian government made following analogous strategy to that adopted by Czechoslovakia seeking control over German political organisations. Since 1935 both Lithuania and Czechoslovakia had been looking for suitable solutions with a view to relieve the political pressure, however, their efforts were a failure. Since 1937 both countries had been following the policy of non-resistance in order to evade a more powerful attack from the German side. In 1938 it became obvious that the diplomatic corps of Lithuania and Czechoslovakia had turned to mere observers as their comments were not helpful in the attempts to control the political situation. Starting with 1938 as the Nazis took up brutal policy against Czechoslovakia, the Lithuanian government pursued the policy of appeasement hoping to avoid any military conflict with Germany. The greatest European powers conceived Sudetenland and Klaipėda region as territories or political objects which were in the spot of Hitler's interest. Lithuanian and Czechoslovakian governments were fully aware of the fact that the future of their territories was subject to German political interests. Using the German minority in Sudetenland and Klaipėda region, Germany implemented its propaganda and native Germans were relocated to their homeland.
- Published
- 2014
9. Deutschen in der litauischen Wirtschaft 1918-1940 (im Vergleich zum Memelgebiet)
- Author
-
Ingrida Jakubavičienė
- Subjects
Lithuanian economy ,German community in Lithuania ,Lietuva (Lithuania) ,Lithuanian German Cultural Union (Kulturverband) ,Lietuva ,vokiečiai ,ūkis ,vokiečių kultūrinė sąjunga (Kulturverbandas) ,Vokietija (Germany) ,Klaipėda. Klaipėdos kraštas (Klaipeda region) - Abstract
Straipsnyje, remiantis archyviniais šaltiniais, tuometine periodika ir statistikos duomenimis, nagrinėjama Lietuvos vokiečių žemės ūkio ir pramonės įmonių veikla šalies ekonominiame gyvenime XX a. 3–4 dešimtmečiais, pateikiami atskirų vokiečių įmonių darbo pavyzdžiai. Lietuvos vokiečių ekonominės veiklos mastas analizuojamas remiantis vokiečių verslo Klaipėdos krašte pavyzdžiais. Aptariamos Lietuvos verslo sąlygos ir konkurencijos įtaka vokiečių ūkio plėtrai, atskleidžiamas Kulturverbando vaidmuo pasinaudojant Vokietijos institucijų teikiama finansine parama, skirta stiprinti vokiečių ekonomines galias. In the 3rd decade, the output of German businesses was quite humble as the majority of German community worked in the agricultural sector or ran small enterprises. They developed their business without any financial aid from Germany. In the 3rd decade, Germans owned very few big companies or estates. Until 1934, the business environment for Germans was quite favourable. In 1935, after the trial against German Nazis from the Klaipėda region, Germans in Lithuania fell under pressure. At the same time, Lithuanians started taking actions to consolidate their weight in the economy. In the 4th decade, the number of German enterprises and pieces of property owned by the minority increased due to the active involvement of Kulturverband, which turned into an organization interested not only in the cultural but also in the economic aspects of the community. With the help of Kulturverband, German farmers and owners of small businesses received financial aid from Germany. However, if compared with the economic situation of Germans in the Klaipėda region, Germans in the rest of Lithuania never had anything close to a dominant position in the business, received fewer financial injections and had to face competition in the market and national discrimination. Evolving business plans were disrupted in 1940 by the political decision of Germany to evict Germans from Lithuania.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.