Search

Objective: Despite widespread monotherapy use of lamotrigine or levetiracetam during pregnancy, prospectively collected, blinded child development data are still limited. The NaME (Neurodevelopment of Babies Born to Mothers With Epilepsy) Study prospectively recruited a new cohort of women with epilepsy and their offspring for longitudinal follow‐up. Methods: Pregnant women of <21 weeks gestation (n = 401) were recruited from 21 hospitals in the UK. Data collection occurred during pregnancy (recruitment, trimester 3) and at 12 and 24 months of age. The primary outcome was blinded assessment of infant cognitive, language, and motor development on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd edition) at 24 months of age with supplementary parent reporting on the Vinelands Adaptive Behavior Scales (2nd edition). Results: There were 394 live births, with 277 children (70%) completing the Bayley assessment at 24 months. There was no evidence of an association of prenatal exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine (−.74, SE = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −6.5 to 5.0, p =.80) or levetiracetam (−1.57, SE = 3.1, 95% CI = −4.6 to 7.7, p =.62) with poorer infant cognition, following adjustment for other maternal and child factors in comparison to nonexposed children. Similar results were observed for language and motor scores. There was no evidence of an association between increasing doses of either lamotrigine or levetiracetam. Nor was there evidence that higher dose folic acid supplementation (≥5 mg/day) or convulsive seizure exposure was associated with child development scores. Continued infant exposure to antiseizure medications through breast milk was not associated with poorer outcomes, but the number of women breastfeeding beyond 3 months was low. Significance: These data are reassuring for infant development following in utero exposure to monotherapy lamotrigine or levetiracetam, but child development is dynamic, and future follow‐up is required to rule out later emerging effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pharmacogenetic guided prescribing can be used to improve the safety and effectiveness of medicines. There are several approaches by which this intervention might be implemented in clinical practice, which will vary depending on the health system and clinical context., Aim: To understand the clinical utility of panel-based pharmacogenetic testing in patients admitted acutely to hospital and to establish variables which predict if an individual might benefit from the intervention., Design: A cross-sectional study recruiting patients admitted acutely to hospital., Methods: Participants underwent panel-based pharmacogenetic testing and their genetic results were analysed in their context of the medicines they had been exposed to as an inpatient. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinically actionable gene-drug interactions. Individual variables which predict the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing were established via logistic regression., Results: Genetic and prescribing data were available for 482 in-patients (55% male; median age 61.2 years; range: 18 to 96), 97.9% of whom carried a pharmacogenetic result of interest. During their admission, 79.5% of patients were exposed to a medicine for which there is pharmacogenetic prescribing guidance available. Just under 1 in 7 individuals (13.7%) had a clinically actionable gene-drug interaction. Increasing age (> 50-years) was positively correlated with the likelihood (2.7-fold increased risk) of having a clinically actionable interaction., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the potential scale, and potential clinical utility, of pharmacogenetic testing as an intervention, highlighting the need to develop infrastructure to support healthcare professionals make use of this emerging tool., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians.)