Search

Background The need to reverse the coagulation impairment caused by chronic antiplatelet agents in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with acute traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) remains controversial. We sought to determine whether emergent platelet transfusion reduces the incidence of hemorrhage expansion, mortality, or need for neurosurgical intervention such as intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, burr holes, or craniotomy. Methods All adult blunt TICH patients (age ≥16 years) over a 4-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with penetrating TBI, blunt TBI without TICH on admission computed tomography (CT), receiving warfarin, not on antiplatelet agents, or requiring immediate operative intervention were excluded. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they received a platelet transfusion: reversal group (RV) versus no reversal group (NR). Patient outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Results 169 blunt TBI patients on chronic antiplatelet therapy were studied (102 RV group, 67 NR group). The groups were well matched with regard to age, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale-head, Glasgow Coma Score, mechanism of injury, need for intubation, time to initial CT scan, and hospital length of stay. Immediate platelet transfusion did not alter the occurrence of TICH extension on follow-up CT (26% vs 21%, P = .71), TBI-specific mortality (9% vs 13%, P = .45), need for ICP monitor (2% vs 3%, P = 1.0), burr hole (1% vs 3%, P = .56), or craniotomy (1% vs 3%, P = .56). Discussion Immediate platelet transfusion is unnecessary in blunt TBI patients on chronic antiplatelet therapy who do not require immediate craniotomy.

Objective To determine if pager interruptions affect operative time, safety, or complications and management of pager issues during a simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Design Twelve surgery resident volunteers were tested on a Simbionix Lap Mentor II simulator. Each resident performed 6 randomized simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomies; 3 with pager interruptions (INT) and 3 without pager interruptions (NO-INT). The pager interruptions were sent in the form of standardized patient vignettes and timed to distract the resident during dissection of the critical view of safety and clipping of the cystic duct. The residents were graded on a pass/fail scale for eliciting appropriate patient history and management of the pager issue. Data was extracted from the simulator for the following endpoints: operative time, safety metrics, and incidence of operative complications. The Mann-Whitney U test and contingency table analysis were used to compare the 2 groups (INT vs. NO-INT). Setting Level I trauma center; Simulation laboratory. Participants Twelve general surgery residents. Results There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in any of the operative endpoints as measured by the simulator. However, in the INT group, only 25% of the time did the surgery residents both adequately address the issue and provide effective patient management in response to the pager interruption. Conclusion Pager interruptions did not affect operative time, safety, or complications during the simulated procedure. However, there were significant failures in the appropriate evaluations and management of pager issues. Consideration for diversion of patient care issues to fellow residents not operating to improve quality and safety of patient care outside the operating room requires further study.

Background The Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) guidelines currently suggest thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for grade II-IV and nonoperative management (NOM) for grade I blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI). However, there is increasing evidence that grade II may also be observed safely. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of TEVAR and NOM for grade I-IV BTAI and determine if grade II can be safely observed with NOM. Methods The records of patients with BTAI from 2004 to 2015 at a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were separated into two groups: TEVAR versus NOM. All BTAIs were graded according to the SVS guidelines. Minimal aortic injury (MAI) was defined as BTAI grade I and II. Failure of NOM was defined as aortic rupture after admission or progression on subsequent computed tomography (CT) imaging requiring TEVAR or open thoracotomy repair (OTR). Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and χ tests. Results A total of 105 adult patients (≥16 years) with BTAI were identified over the 11-year period. Of these, 17 patients who died soon after arrival and 17 who underwent OTR were excluded. Of the remaining 71 patients, 30 had MAI (14 TEVAR vs. 16 NOM). There were no failures in either group. No patients with MAI in either group died from complications of aortic lesions. Follow-up CT imaging was performed on all MAI patients. Follow-up CT scans for all TEVAR patients showed stable stents with no leak. Follow-up CT in the NOM group showed progression in two patients neither required subsequent OTR or TEVAR. Conclusions Although the SVS guidelines suggest TEVAR for grade II-IV and NOM for grade I BTAI, NOM may be safely used in grade II BTAI. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, level IV.

Surgery used to be the treatment of choice in patients with solid organ injuries. This has changed over the past 2 decades secondary to advances in noninvasive diagnostic techniques, increased availability of less invasive procedures, and a better understanding of the natural history of solid organ injuries. Now, nonoperative management (NOM) has become the initial management strategy used for most solid organ injuries. Even though NOM has become the standard of care in patients with solid organ injuries in most trauma centers, surgeons should not hesitate to operate on a patient to control life-threatening hemorrhage.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on mortality after traumatic injury. The records of patients from 2012 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were stratified into the following groups based on admission BMI (kg/m2): underweight (UW) (BMI 40). The groups were well matched with no significant differences in demographics and Injury Severity Score. Morality for the IW group was compared with the remaining BMI groups. A total of 6049 patients were identified. In comparison with IW group, the UW mortality was significantly higher (IW vs UW, 4.1% vs 8.8%, P = 0.001); however, the there was no significant difference with remaining groups. There was also no significant difference in mortality between IW and the remaining groups for patients that went directly to the operating room or for patients that had penetrating trauma (stab wounds and gunshot wounds). However, for blunt trauma, the mortality was significantly higher for UW (IW vs UW, 4.3% vs 9.4%, P = 0.001), no different for IW vs OW (4.3% vs 3.7%, P = 0.3), and significantly lower for IW vs OB (4.3% vs 2.8%, P = 0.04) and for IW vs MO (4.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.03). After traumatic injuries, it is the underweight patients (BMI

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on mortality after traumatic injury. The records of patients from 2012 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were stratified into the following groups based on admission BMI (kg/m2): underweight (UW) (BMI19), ideal weight (IW) (BMI = 19-24.9), overweight (OW) (BMI = 25-29.9), obese (OB) (BMI = 30-39.9), and morbid obese (MO) (BMI40). The groups were well matched with no significant differences in demographics and Injury Severity Score. Morality for the IW group was compared with the remaining BMI groups. A total of 6049 patients were identified. In comparison with IW group, the UW mortality was significantly higher (IW vs UW, 4.1% vs 8.8%, P = 0.001); however, the there was no significant difference with remaining groups. There was also no significant difference in mortality between IW and the remaining groups for patients that went directly to the operating room or for patients that had penetrating trauma (stab wounds and gunshot wounds). However, for blunt trauma, the mortality was significantly higher for UW (IW vs UW, 4.3% vs 9.4%, P = 0.001), no different for IW vs OW (4.3% vs 3.7%, P = 0.3), and significantly lower for IW vs OB (4.3% vs 2.8%, P = 0.04) and for IW vs MO (4.3% vs 1.0%, P = 0.03). After traumatic injuries, it is the underweight patients (BMI19) and not the obese, that are at a significantly higher risk for overall mortality; this difference is especially evident after blunt trauma where obesity may actually confer a protective role.

Nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable high-grade (IV-V) blunt splenic trauma remains controversial given the high failure rates (19%) that persist despite angioembolization (AE) protocols. The NOM protocol was modified in 2011 to include mandatory AE of all grade (IV-V) injuries without contrast blush (CB) along with selective AE of grade (I-V) with CB. The purpose of this study was to determine if this new AE (NAE) protocol significantly lowered the failure rates for grade (IV-V) injuries allowing for safe observation without surgery and if the exclusion of grade III injuries allowed for the prevention of unnecessary angiograms without affecting the overall failure rates.The records of patients with blunt splenic trauma from January 2000 to October 2014 at a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups and failure of NOM (FNOM) rates compared: NAE protocol (2011-2014) with mandatory AE for all grade (IV-V) injuries without CB and selective AE for grade (I-V) with CB versus old AE (OAE) protocol (2000-2010) with selective AE for grade (I-V) with CB.Seven hundred twelve patients underwent NOM with 522 (73%) in the OAE group and 190 (27%) in the NAE group. Evolving from the OAE to the NAE strategy resulted in a significantly lower FNOM rate for the overall group (grade I-V) (OAE vs. NAE, 4% to 1%, p = 0.04) and the grade (IV-V) group (OAE vs. NAE, 19% vs. 3%, p = 0.01). Angiograms were avoided in 113 grade (I-III) injuries with no CB; these patients had NOM with observation alone and none failed.A protocol using mandatory AE of all high-grade (IV-V) injuries without CB and selective AE of grade (I-V) with CB may provide for optimum salvage with safe NOM of the high-grade injuries (IV-V) and limited unnecessary angiograms.Therapeutic study, level IV.

Background To clarify the role, indications, and outcomes for angioembolization (AE) of nonoperatively managed (NOM) splenic trauma, the implications of absent contrast blush (CB) on computed tomography of high-grade (IV-V) blunt splenic trauma (BST) in adults were analyzed. Methods All BST patients presenting at a single institution from July 2000 to December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Grade of injury (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma scale), CB on initial computed tomography, numbers of NOM and undergoing AE, and failures of NOM were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using χ(2). Results Of the 1,056 total BST patients, 556 (64%) were hemodynamically stable and eligible for NOM; 95 NOM patients (17%) had CB. AE was performed in 88 of these, with angiographic extravasation found in 86 (97.7%), and 3 of these 88 (3.4%) failed NOM. The remaining 7 CBs were observed without AE, of which 5 (71.4%) failed NOM (p = 0.0004). Of all 556 NOM patients, 51 (9.5%) had high-grade injuries without CB; 20 of these (39%) underwent AE, 17 (85.0%) underwent angiographic extravasation, and there were no NOM failures in this group. The other 31 high-grade injuries without CB or AE had 8 failures of NOM (26%) (p = 0.03). Conclusion The strong correlation of CB with active bleeding on angiogram mandates AE for CB in all BST undergoing NOM. However, the absence of CB in high-grade (IV-V) BST does not reliably exclude active bleeding. This may be the reason for the high reported failure rates of NOM in high-grade (IV-V) BST because AE is not typically performed in the absence of CB. These data suggest that all hemodynamically stable high-grade (IV-V) BST in adults should undergo AE regardless of CB to optimize the success and safety of NOM. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, level III.

BACKGROUND: During the last century, the management of blunt force trauma to the liver has changed from observation and expectant management in the early part of the 1900s to mainly operative intervention, to the current practice of selective operative and nonoperative management. These issues were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma in the Practice Management Guidelines for Nonoperative Management of Blunt Injury to the Liver and Spleen published online in 2003. Since that time, a large volume of literature on these topics has been published requiring a reevaluation of the previous Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma guideline. METHODS: The National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database were searched using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search was designed to identify English-language citations published after 1996 (the last year included in the previous guideline) using the keywords liver injury and blunt abdominal trauma. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six articles were reviewed, of which 94 were used to create the current practice management guideline for the selective nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury. CONCLUSION: Most original hepatic guidelines remained valid and were incorporated into the greatly expanded current guidelines as appropriate. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries currently is the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of the grade of injury or patient age. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries should only be considered in an environment that provides capabilities for monitoring, serial clinical evaluations, and an operating room available for urgent laparotomy. Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and peritonitis still warrant emergent operative intervention. Intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomographic scan is the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluating blunt hepatic injuries. Repeated imaging should be guided by a patient’s clinical status. Adjunctive therapies like angiography, percutaneous drainage, endoscopy/endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopy remain important adjuncts to nonoperative management of hepatic injuries. Despite the explosion of literature on this topic, many questions regarding nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injuries remain without conclusive answers in the literature. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73: S288YS293.

Background The assessment and treatment of trauma patients begins in the prehospital environment. Studies have validated the shock index as a correlate for mortality and the identification of shock in trauma patients. We investigated the use of the first shock index obtained in the prehospital environment and the first shock index obtained upon arrival in the trauma center as correlates for other outcomes to evaluate its usefulness as a triage tool. Methods This is a retrospective review of data from a level I trauma center. Prehospital and trauma center shock indices for 16,269 patients were evaluated as correlates for duration of hospital stay, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, the number of ventilator days, blood product use, and destination of transfer from the trauma center. Results Pearson correlation coefficients revealed that the relationship of prehospital and trauma center shock indices were correlates for duration of hospital stay, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, the number of ventilator days, and blood product use. A chi-square analysis found that shock indices ≥0.9 indicate a higher likelihood of disposition to the intensive care unit, operating room, or death. Conclusion A prehospital shock index for trauma correlates with measures of hospital resource use and mortality. A prospective study is needed to determine the use of this measure as a triage tool.

Background The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of age on the outcomes of nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic trauma (BST). Study Design The records of patients with BST, from July 2000 to December 2010 at a level I trauma center, were retrospectively reviewed using NTRACS (National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons). Patients were divided into 2 age groups: 17 to 55 years and greater than 55 years. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with failure of nonoperative management (FNOM). Results There were 539 hemodynamically stable patients with BST who underwent NOM. Of these, 459 were age 55 or less, and 80 were greater than 55. Overall, there was no significant difference in FNOM rate for patients age 55 or less vs greater than 55 (4% vs 5%, p=0.73). This also held true when FNOM was analyzed by each grade: I (1% vs 3%, p=0.38), II (2% vs 0%, p=1.0), III (4% vs 0%, p=1.0), IV (8% vs 20%, p=0.33), and V (21% vs 50%, p=0.47). The addition of angioembolization (AE) to high grade IV to V injuries significantly lowered the FNOM rate: age 55 or less (6% AE vs 28% NO-AE, p=0.02); with a trend toward significance for age greater than 55 (0% AE vs 60% NO-AE, p=0.2). Age was not a statistically significant independent risk factor for FNOM (p = 0.37). Conclusions Age does not affect outcomes of NOM of BST. High grade (IV to V) injuries are not a contraindication to NOM for patients older than 55. As experience with AE grows in patients with high grade injury and age greater than 55, it may prove to be a valuable adjunct to NOM in this group of patients.

Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are difficult to diagnose and often go unrecognized after blunt trauma. We proposed that CT scan with coronal reconstruction (CTCR) improves the detection of small DIs missed by chest x-ray (CXR) and CT scan with axial views (CTAX). We performed a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center from 2001 to 2006 and identified 35 patients who underwent operative repair of DI after blunt trauma. The size of the DI and the radiographic test (CXR, CTAX, and CTCR) that identified the defect was compared. Results were analyzed using mean, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher exact test. Of the 35 DI repairs, nine were performed after CXR alone and 12 after identification by both a CXR and CTAX. There was no significant difference between the mean DI size identified by CXR with and without CTAX (10.6 vs 9.7, P = 0.88). The remaining 14 DIs were undetected by CXR and CTAX. Seven of these (before CTCR) were found during exploratory laparotomy and seven were identified by CTCR (4.6 cm vs 3.5 cm, P = 0.33). The mean DI size identified by CTCR was significantly smaller than that identified by CXR alone (4.6 cm vs 9.7 cm, P < 0.05) and by CXR and CTAX (4.6 cm vs 10.6 cm, P < 0.0005). CTCR improves the ability to detect smaller DI defects (4 to 8 cm) that were previously missed by CXR and CTAX. CTAX adds little to CXR alone for the diagnosis of large defects (greater than 8 cm).

Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) guidelines have a near 100 per cent negative predictive value for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) in children with mild head injury (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS] 14 or 15). Our goal was to retrospectively apply their criteria to our database to determine the potential impact on the rates of unnecessary head computed tomography (CT) and ciTBI detection. The records of pediatric patients with GCS 14 to 15 that had a head CT for suspected TBI after blunt trauma from 2008 to 2010 were reviewed. Of 493 children, CT was negative in 447 (91%), but findings were present in 46 (9%). Applying PECARN recommendations, 178 (36%) met all six criteria but still underwent head CT; all were negative. The remaining 315 (64%) missed one or more PECARN criteria and underwent CT; only 46 (15%) had findings, and two (0.6%) required surgery. There were no false-negatives. The negative predictive value for ciTBI was 100 per cent. Observance of PECARN guidelines identifies children who do not require CT, increasing the yield of finding a ciTBI among those who cannot satisfy all six criteria.

An increasing number of super geriatric (age older than 80 years) patients are being hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although geriatric (age older than 65 years) patients have been reported to have a worse functional outcome compared with younger patients who present with the same or less severe degree of TBI; the mortality for the super geriatric (age older than 80 years) remains to be determined. Knowledge of their hospital mortality may help improve clinical decision-making protocols and resource use. A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained TBI after blunt trauma was performed over a 3-year period (June 2005 to June 2008) at a Level II trauma center. Mortality was calculated for various age groupings and data analyzed using analysis of variance test and χ2 test. We hypothesized that mortality would increase significantly with increasing age from the geriatric to the super geriatric group. A total of 2369 patients were evaluated with 744 pediatric patients in Group I (age younger than 17 years), 1297 adult patients in Group II (age 17-64 years), 185 geriatric patients in Group III (age 65-80 years), and 143 super geriatric patients in Group IV (age older than 80 years). The respective mortalities for each group were as follows: Group I (6%), Group II (9%), Group III (21%), and Group IV (6%). There was no significant difference in the Injury Severity Score for the four groups. In comparing Group III with Groups I and II, we found a significant increase in mortality with increasing age as reported in the literature (21 vs 6%, P = 0.01 and 21 vs 9%, P = 0.04). However, in comparing Group IV with the other three groups, there was no significant difference in mortality. There was a trend toward decrease in mortality from age Group III to IV (21 vs 6%, P = 0.09), which is of unclear etiology and warrants further study. In patients with blunt TBI, there is no significant difference in mortality between the super geriatric age group (age older than 80 years) and the younger pediatric, adult, and geriatric age groups. Resource use therefore should not be limited to patients older than 80 years with TBI.

The purposes of this study were to examine the current Brain Trauma Foundation recommendation for antiseizure prophylaxis with phenytoin during the first 7 days after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in preventing seizures and to determine if this medication affects functional recovery at discharge.The records of adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients with blunt severe TBI who remained in the hospital at least 7 days after injury were retrospectively reviewed from January 2008 to January 2010. Clinical seizure rates during the first 7 days after injury and functional outcome at discharge were compared for the two groups based on antiseizure prophylaxis, no prophylaxis (NP) versus phenytoin prophylaxis (PP). Statistical analysis was performed using χ2.A total of 93 adult patients who met the previously mentioned criteria were identified (43 [46%] NP group vs. 50 [54%] PP group). The two groups were well matched. Contrary to expectation, more seizures occurred in the PP group as compared with the NP group; however, this did not reach significance (PP vs. NP, 2 [4%] vs. 1 [2.3%], p = 1). There was no significant difference in the two groups (PP vs. NP) as far as disposition are concerned, mortality caused by head injury (4 [8%] vs. 3 [7%], p = 1), discharge home (16 [32%] vs. 17 [40%], p = 0.7), and discharge to rehabilitation (30 [60%] vs. 23 [53%], p = 0.9). However, with PP, there was a significantly longer hospital stay (PP vs. NP, 36 vs. 25 days, p = 0.04) and significantly worse functional outcome at discharge based on Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score (PP vs. NP, 2.9 vs. 3.4, p0.01) and modified Rankin Scale score (2.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.02).PP may not decrease early posttraumatic seizure and may suppress functional outcome after blunt TBI. These results need to be verified with randomized studies before recommending changes in clinical practice and do not apply to penetrating trauma.Therapeutic study, level IV; epidemiologic study, level III.

Shock index as the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure is a simple triage tool that correlates well with various outcomes in trauma patients. Concern has been raised regarding the accuracy of shock index in older patients. We sought to investigate the effects of age on the accuracy of shock index.This is a retrospective review of data from a level I trauma center. Shock index was calculated for 16,269 patients, and they were stratified into age groups by decade. The correlation between prehospital shock index for each of the age groups and for several outcome variables were evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficients. Logistic regression was used to evaluate an increase in shock index during transit and its relationship with mortality.All correlation values for patients between 16 and 60 years of age were positive (P.05). In patients who are older than 80 years, none of the correlations with the outcome variables were statistically significant. In patients older than 60 years, an increased shock index during transit correlated with an increase in mortality rates.As expected, prehospital shock index alone has diminishing accuracy for patients older than 60 years of age and should be interpreted cautiously by trauma triage personnel. Shock index alone in patients younger than 60, and its increase during transit in patients older than 60, can be used as a valuable tool for the prehospital triage of trauma patients when determining the need for transport to a trauma center, preparation of resources, or activation of the trauma team.

During the last century, the management of blunt force trauma to the spleen has changed from observation and expectant management in the early part of the 1900s to mainly operative intervention, to the current practice of selective operative and nonoperative management. These issues were first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) in the Practice Management Guidelines for Non-operative Management of Blunt Injury to the Liver and Spleen published online in 2003. Since that time, a large volume of literature on these topics has been published requiring a reevaluation of the current EAST guideline.The National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health MEDLINE database was searched using Pub Med (www.pubmed.gov). The search was designed to identify English-language citations published after 1996 (the last year included in the previous guideline) using the keywords splenic injury and blunt abdominal trauma.One hundred seventy-six articles were reviewed, of which 125 were used to create the current practice management guideline for the selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury.There has been a plethora of literature regarding nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries published since the original EAST practice management guideline was written. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries is now the treatment modality of choice in hemodynamically stable patients, irrespective of the grade of injury, patient age, or the presence of associated injuries. Its use is associated with a low overall morbidity and mortality when applied to an appropriate patient population. Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries should only be considered in an environment that provides capabilities for monitoring, serial clinical evaluations, and has an operating room available for urgent laparotomy. Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and peritonitis still warrant emergent operative intervention. Intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomographic scan is the diagnostic modality of choice for evaluating blunt splenic injuries. Repeat imaging should be guided by a patient's clinical status. Adjunctive therapies like angiography with embolization are increasingly important adjuncts to nonoperative management of splenic injuries. Despite the explosion of literature on this topic, many questions regarding nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries remain without conclusive answers in the literature.

BACKGROUND To determine whether angioembolization (AE) in hemodynamically stable adult patients with blunt splenic trauma (BST) at high risk for failure of nonoperative management (NOM) (contrast blush [CB] on computed tomography, high-grade IV-V injuries, or decreasing hemoglobin) results in lower failure rates than reported. METHODS The records of patients with BST from July 2000 to December 2010 at a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed using National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons. Failure of NOM (FNOM) occurred if splenic surgery was required after attempted NOM. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with FNOM. RESULTS A total of 1,039 patients with BST were found. Pediatric patients (age

Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are difficult to diagnose and often go unrecognized after blunt trauma. We proposed that CT scan with coronal reconstruction (CTCR) improves the detection of small DIs missed by chest x-ray (CXR) and CT scan with axial views (CTAX). We performed a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center from 2001 to 2006 and identified 35 patients who underwent operative repair of DI after blunt trauma. The size of the DI and the radiographic test (CXR, CTAX, and CTCR) that identified the defect was compared. Results were analyzed using mean, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher exact test. Of the 35 DI repairs, nine were performed after CXR alone and 12 after identification by both a CXR and CTAX. There was no significant difference between the mean DI size identified by CXR with and without CTAX (10.6 vs 9.7, P = 0.88). The remaining 14 DIs were undetected by CXR and CTAX. Seven of these (before CTCR) were found during exploratory laparotomy and seven were identified by CTCR (4.6 cm vs 3.5 cm, P = 0.33). The mean DI size identified by CTCR was significantly smaller than that identified by CXR alone (4.6 cm vs 9.7 cm, P0.05) and by CXR and CTAX (4.6 cm vs 10.6 cm, P0.0005). CTCR improves the ability to detect smaller DI defects (4 to 8 cm) that were previously missed by CXR and CTAX. CTAX adds little to CXR alone for the diagnosis of large defects (greater than 8 cm).

An increasing number of super geriatric (age older than 80 years) patients are being hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although geriatric (age older than 65 years) patients have been reported to have a worse functional outcome compared with younger patients who present with the same or less severe degree of TBI; the mortality for the super geriatric (age older than 80 years) remains to be determined. Knowledge of their hospital mortality may help improve clinical decision-making protocols and resource use. A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained TBI after blunt trauma was performed over a 3-year period (June 2005 to June 2008) at a Level II trauma center. Mortality was calculated for various age groupings and data analyzed using analysis of variance test and chi2 test. We hypothesized that mortality would increase significantly with increasing age from the geriatric to the super geriatric group. A total of 2369 patients were evaluated with 744 pediatric patients in Group I (age younger than 17 years), 1297 adult patients in Group II (age 17-64 years), 185 geriatric patients in Group III (age 65-80 years), and 143 super geriatric patients in Group IV (age older than 80 years). The respective mortalities for each group were as follows: Group I (6%), Group II (9%), Group III (21%), and Group IV (6%). There was no significant difference in the Injury Severity Score for the four groups. In comparing Group III with Groups I and II, we found a significant increase in mortality with incresing age as reported in the literature (21 vs. 6%, P = 0.01 and 21 vs. 9%, P = 0.04). However, in comparing Group IV with the other three groups, there was no significant difference in mortality. There was a trend toward decrease in mortality from age Group III to IV (21 vs. 6%, P = 0.09), which is of unclear etiology and warrants further study. In patients with blunt TBI, there is no significant difference in mortality between the super geriatric age group (age older than 80 years) and the younger pediatric, adult, and geriatric age groups. Resource use therefore should not be limited to patients older than 80 years with TBI.

Presented during Poster Grand Rounds at the Annual Scientific Meeting and Postgraduate Course Program, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Savannah, GA, February 10–13, 2007.

Vascular endothelial cells (ECs), forming a boundary between the circulating blood and the vessel wall, are constantly subjected to fluid shear stress due to blood flow. The aim of this study was to determine the role of the recently identified IkappaB kinases (IKKs) in shear stress activation of NF-kappaB and to elucidate the upstream signaling mechanism that mediates IKK activation. Our results demonstrate that IKKs in ECs are activated by shear stress in a rapid and transient manner. This IKK activation is followed by IkappaB degradation and NF-kappaB translocation into the nucleus. Transfection of plasmids encoding catalytic inactive mutants of IKKs, i.e. hemagglutinin (HA)-IKKalpha(K44M) and HA-IKKbeta(K44A), inhibits shear stress-induced NF-kappaB translocation. In addition, constructs encoding antisense IKKs, i.e. HA-IKKalpha(AS) and HA-IKKbeta(AS), attenuate shear stress induction of a promoter driven by the kappaB enhancer element. Preincubation of the EC monolayer with a monoclonal anti-alphavbeta3 integrin antibody (clone LM609) attenuates shear stress induction of IKK. Inhibition of tyrosine kinases by genistein causes a similar down-regulating effect. These results suggest that the integrin-mediated signaling pathway regulates NF-kappaB through IKKs in ECs in response to shear stress.