Search

We compare objectives and approaches of four regional studies of marine biodiversity: Gulf of Maine Area Census of Marine Life, Baltic Sea History of Marine Animal Populations, Great Barrier Reef Seabed Biodiversity Project, and Gulf of Mexico Biodiversity Project. Each program was designed as an "ecosystem" scale but was created independently and executed differently. Each lasted 8 to 10 years, including several years to refine program objectives, raise funding, and develop research networks. All resulted in improved baseline data and in new, or revised, data systems. Each contributed to the creation or evolution of interdisciplinary teams, and to regional, national, or international science-management linkages. To date, there have been differing extents of delivery and use of scientific information to and by management, with greatest integration by the program designed around specific management questions. We evaluate each research program's relative emphasis on three principal elements of biodiversity organization: composition, structure, and function. This approach is used to analyze existing ecosystem-wide biodiversity knowledge and to assess what is known and where gaps exist. In all four of these systems and studies, there is a relative paucity of investigation on functional elements of biodiversity, when compared with compositional and structural elements. This is symptomatic of the current state of the science. Substantial investment in understanding one or more biodiversity element(s) will allow issues to be addressed in a timely and more integrative fashion. Evaluating research needs and possible approaches across specific elements of biodiversity organization can facilitate planning of future studies and lead to more effective communication between scientists, managers, and stakeholders. Building a general approach that captures how various studies have focused on different biodiversity elements can also contribute to meta-analyses of worldwide experienc

This paper forms part of a broader overview of biodiversity of marine life in the Gulf of Maine area (GoMA), facilitated by the GoMA Census of Marine Life program. It synthesizes current data on species diversity of zooplankton and pelagic nekton, including compilation of observed species and descriptions of seasonal, regional and cross-shelf diversity patterns. Zooplankton diversity in the GoMA is characterized by spatial differences in community composition among the neritic environment, the coastal shelf, and deep offshore waters. Copepod diversity increased with depth on the Scotian Shelf. On the coastal shelf of the western Gulf of Maine, the number of higher-level taxonomic groups declined with distance from shore, reflecting more nearshore meroplankton. Copepod diversity increased in late summer, and interdecadal diversity shifts were observed, including a period of higher diversity in the 1990s. Changes in species diversity were greatest on interannual scales, intermediate on seasonal scales, and smallest across regions, in contrast to abundance patterns, suggesting that zooplankton diversity may be a more sensitive indicator of ecosystem response to interannual climate variation than zooplankton abundance. Local factors such as bathymetry, proximity of the coast, and advection probably drive zooplankton and pelagic nekton diversity patterns in the GoMA, while ocean-basin-scale diversity patterns probably contribute to the increase in diversity at the Scotian Shelf break, a zone of mixing between the cold-temperate community of the shelf and the warm-water community offshore. Pressing research needs include establishment of a comprehensive system for observing change in zooplankton and pelagic nekton diversity, enhanced observations of “underknown” but important functional components of the ecosystem, population and metapopulation studies, and development of analytical modeling tools to enhance understanding of diversity patterns and drivers. Ultimately, sus

In the Gulf of Maine area (GoMA), as elsewhere in the ocean, the organisms of greatest numerical abundance are microbes. Viruses in GoMA are largely cyanophages and bacteriophages, including podoviruses which lack tails. There is also evidence of Mimivirus and Chlorovirus in the metagenome. Bacteria in GoMA comprise the dominant SAR11 phylotype cluster, and other abundant phylotypes such as SAR86-like cluster, SAR116-like cluster, Roseobacter, Rhodospirillaceae, Acidomicrobidae, Flavobacteriales, Cytophaga, and unclassified Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria clusters. Bacterial epibionts of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense include Rhodobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, Cytophaga spp., Sulfitobacter spp., Sphingomonas spp., and unclassified Bacteroidetes. Phototrophic prokaryotes in GoMA include cyanobacteria that contain chlorophyll (mainly Synechococcus), aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs that contain bacteriochlorophyll, and bacteria that contain proteorhodopsin. Eukaryotic microalgae in GoMA include Bacillariophyceae, Dinophyceae, Prymnesiophyceae, Prasinophyceae, Trebouxiophyceae, Cryptophyceae, Dictyochophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Eustigmatophyceae, Pelagophyceae, Synurophyceae, and Xanthophyceae. There are no records of Bolidophyceae, Aurearenophyceae, Raphidophyceae, and Synchromophyceae in GoMA. In total, there are records for 665 names and 229 genera of microalgae. Heterotrophic eukaryotic protists in GoMA include Dinophyceae, Alveolata, Apicomplexa, amoeboid organisms, Labrynthulida, and heterotrophic marine stramenopiles (MAST). Ciliates include Strombidium, Lohmaniella, Tontonia, Strobilidium, Strombidinopsis and the mixotrophs Laboea strobila and Myrionecta rubrum (ex Mesodinium rubra). An inventory of selected microbial groups in each of 14 physiographic regions in GoMA is made by combining information on the depth-dependent variation of cell density and the depth-dependent variation of water volume. Across the entire GoMA, an estimate for the

We propose to combine field observations and laboratory experiments to understand the coupling of physical and biological processes that transfer energy from lower to higher trophic levels on a small offshore bank. We focus this study on Platts Bank, in the western Gulf of Maine, and on the the relationship between internal waves, patchiness of planktonic organisms (especially euphausiids, Meganyctiphanes norvegica), and feeding and residence times of upper trophic level predators (marine and avian, but especially baleen whales, and particularly the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae). Observations from Platts Bank and other feeding hotspots in the Gulf of Maine show that high levels of feeding activity are ephemeral--sometimes very active, often not. Differences can exist between weeks and between years. Our goals are to understand the factors that drive the "on" and "off" patterns of feeding at features such as Platts Bank, and to gain insights into the foraging strategies and mechanisms employed by highly mobile predators to exploit ephemeral and scattered feeding locations.

We propose to combine field observations and laboratory experiments to understand the coupling of physical and biological processes that transfer energy from lower to higher trophic levels on a small offshore bank. We focus this study on Platts Bank, in the western Gulf of Maine, and on the relationship between internal waves, patchiness of planktonic organisms (especially euphausiids, Meganyctiphanes norvegica), and feeding and residence times of upper trophic level predators (marine and avian, but especially baleen whales, and particularly the abundant humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae). Observations from Platts Bank and other feeding hotspots in the Gulf of Maine show that they are ephemeral - sometimes very active, often not. Our goals are to understand the factors that drive the "on" and "off" patterns of feeding at features such as Platts Bank, and to gain insights into the foraging strategies and mechanisms employed by highly mobile predators to exploit ephemeral and scattered feeding locations. 1. Quantify patterns of upper trophic level use of Platts Bank over multiple years, extending observations from the original two years of observation that preceded this award. 2. Describe behaviors adapted to feeding on Platts Bank and foraging on networks of scattered feeding sites such as Platts. 3. Measure and describe the internal wave field, associated velocities, and euphausiid distribution and abundance patterns. 4. Use field and laboratory studies to document and quantify the behavior of euphausiids and the coupled bio-physical processes that affect surface patch formation, in particular testing the hypothesis that internal waves help drive surface aggregations and upper trophic level feeding.

The primary goal of our research is to understand mechanisms that lead to highly focused feeding patterns of upper trophic level predators near offshore topographic features such as banks and ridges. These mechanisms likely differ from feature to feature and over time, but probably involve a limited number of key prey species, behaviors, and physical processes. Understanding the conditions and processes that generate feeding "hotspots" is essential to understanding their temporal variability, and whether good feeding conditions are limited by bottom-up or top-down controls (bottom-up would be characteristic of zooplankton prey, whereas top-down might prevail if schooling fish played a facilitating role and also were prey). The mechanisms and controls, in turn, influence the residence times and feeding success of mobile predators such as birds and marine mammals. The more ephemeral and less dependable the phenomena, the more frequent the movement of top predators must be in search of prey. This affects energy budgets (thus growth and reproduction) and average distributions of the top predators. Our second goal, tied to results of the first, is to understand factors that influence within and between-year differences in feeding conditions., Prepared in cooperation with Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, ME and New England Aquarium, Boston, MA.

The objective of this research is to identify open ocean and coastal water features appearing within photographs taken during U.S. Space Shuttle missions (1981-1991) and to investigate their geographic and temporal occurrences. In addition to a comprehensive review of these data, to be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, this work will culminate in a database of coastal and ocean photographic data that may be accessed with standard desk-top computer equipment and software. Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences will provide facility support and Dr. Steven C. Ackleson will perform the research.