Search

Code-mixing is the practice of using two or more languages in a single sentence, which often occurs in multilingual communities such as India where people commonly speak multiple languages. Classic NLP tools, trained on monolingual data, face challenges when dealing with code-mixed data. Extracting meaningful information from sentences containing multiple languages becomes difficult, particularly in tasks like hate speech detection, due to linguistic variation, cultural nuances, and data sparsity. To address this, we aim to analyze the significance of code-mixed embeddings and evaluate the performance of BERT and HingBERT models (trained on a Hindi-English corpus) in hate speech detection. Our study demonstrates that HingBERT models, benefiting from training on the extensive Hindi-English dataset L3Cube-HingCorpus, outperform BERT models when tested on hate speech text datasets. We also found that code-mixed Hing-FastText performs better than standard English FastText and vanilla BERT models.

The parameterized analysis of graph modification problems represents the most extensively studied area within Parameterized Complexity. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\in\mathbb{N}$ as input, the goal is to determine whether we can perform at most $k$ operations on $G$ to transform it into a graph belonging to a specified graph class $\mathcal{F}$. Typical operations are combinatorial and include vertex deletions and edge deletions, insertions, and contractions. However, in many real-world scenarios, when the input graph is constrained to be a geometric intersection graph, the modification of the graph is influenced by changes in the geometric properties of the underlying objects themselves, rather than by combinatorial modifications. It raises the question of whether vertex deletions or adjacency modifications are necessarily the most appropriate modification operations for studying modifications of geometric graphs. We propose the study of the disk intersection graph modification through the scaling of disks. This operation is typical in the realm of topology control but has not yet been explored in the context of Parameterized Complexity. We design parameterized algorithms and kernels for modifying to the most basic graph classes: edgeless, connected, and acyclic. Our technical contributions encompass a novel combination of linear programming, branching, and kernelization techniques, along with a fresh application of bidimensionality theory to analyze the area covered by disks, which may have broader applicability., Comment: To appear in ITCS 2025

It is proved that if there is an $\aleph_2$-Aronszajn line, then there is one that does not contain an $\aleph_2$-Countryman line. This solves a problem of Moore and stands in a sharp contrast with his Basis Theorem for linear orders of size $\aleph_1$. The proof combines walks on ordinals, club guessing, strong colourings of three different types, and a bit of finite combinatorics. This and further non-structure theorems for Aronszajn lines and trees are established for successors of regulars, successors of singulars, as well as inaccessibles., Comment: This is a preliminary preprint. More results are upcoming. For updates, please visit http://assafrinot.com/paper/71

We propose a novel clustering model encompassing two well-known clustering models: k-center clustering and k-median clustering. In the Hybrid k-Clusetring problem, given a set P of points in R^d, an integer k, and a non-negative real r, our objective is to position k closed balls of radius r to minimize the sum of distances from points not covered by the balls to their closest balls. Equivalently, we seek an optimal L_1-fitting of a union of k balls of radius r to a set of points in the Euclidean space. When r=0, this corresponds to k-median; when the minimum sum is zero, indicating complete coverage of all points, it is k-center. Our primary result is a bicriteria approximation algorithm that, for a given \epsilon>0, produces a hybrid k-clustering with balls of radius (1+\epsilon)r. This algorithm achieves a cost at most 1+\epsilon of the optimum, and it operates in time 2^{(kd/\epsilon)^{O(1)}} n^{O(1)}. Notably, considering the established lower bounds on k-center and k-median, our bicriteria approximation stands as the best possible result for Hybrid k-Clusetring., Comment: Accepted at APPROX 2024

RNA sequencing techniques, like bulk RNA-seq and Single Cell (sc) RNA-seq, are critical tools for the biologist looking to analyze the genetic activity/transcriptome of a tissue or cell during an experimental procedure. Platforms like Illumina's next-generation sequencing (NGS) are used to produce the raw data for this experimental procedure. This raw FASTQ data must then be prepared via a complex series of data manipulations by bioinformaticians. This process currently takes place on an unwieldy textual user interface like a terminal/command line that requires the user to install and import multiple program packages, preventing the untrained biologist from initiating data analysis. Open-source platforms like Galaxy have produced a more user-friendly pipeline, yet the visual interface remains cluttered and highly technical, remaining uninviting for the natural scientist. To address this, SeqMate is a user-friendly tool that allows for one-click analytics by utilizing the power of a large language model (LLM) to automate both data preparation and analysis (differential expression, trajectory analysis, etc). Furthermore, by utilizing the power of generative AI, SeqMate is also capable of analyzing such findings and producing written reports of upregulated/downregulated/user-prompted genes with sources cited from known repositories like PubMed, PDB, and Uniprot.

{\sc Vertex $(s, t)$-Cut} and {\sc Vertex Multiway Cut} are two fundamental graph separation problems in algorithmic graph theory. We study matroidal generalizations of these problems, where in addition to the usual input, we are given a representation $R \in \mathbb{F}^{r \times n}$ of a linear matroid $\mathcal{M} = (V(G), \mathcal{I})$ of rank $r$ in the input, and the goal is to determine whether there exists a vertex subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ that has the required cut properties, as well as is independent in the matroid $\mathcal{M}$. We refer to these problems as {\sc Independent Vertex $(s, t)$-cut}, and {\sc Independent Multiway Cut}, respectively. We show that these problems are fixed-parameter tractable ({\sf FPT}) when parameterized by the solution size (which can be assumed to be equal to the rank of the matroid $\mathcal{M}$). These results are obtained by exploiting the recent technique of flow augmentation [Kim et al.~STOC '22], combined with a dynamic programming algorithm on flow-paths \'a la [Feige and Mahdian,~STOC '06] that maintains a representative family of solutions w.r.t.~the given matroid [Marx, TCS '06; Fomin et al., JACM]. As a corollary, we also obtain {\sf FPT} algorithms for the independent version of {\sc Odd Cycle Transversal}. Further, our results can be generalized to other variants of the problems, e.g., weighted versions, or edge-deletion versions.

We prove that for every colouring of pairs of reals with finitely-many colours, there is a set homeomorphic to the rationals which takes no more than two colours. This was conjectured by Galvin in 1970, and a colouring of Sierpi{\'n}ski from 1933 witnesses that the number of colours cannot be reduced to one. Previously in 1985 Shelah had shown that a stronger statement is consistent with a forcing construction assuming the existence of large cardinals. Then in 2018 Raghavan and Todor\v{c}evi\'c had proved it assuming the existence of large cardinals. We prove it in $ZFC$. In fact Raghavan and Todor\v{c}evi\'c proved, assuming more large cardinals, a similar result for a large class of topological spaces. We prove this also, again in $ZFC$., Comment: Preliminary version

Classical work on metric space based committee selection problem interprets distance as ``near is better''. In this work, motivated by real-life situations, we interpret distance as ``far is better''. Formally stated, we initiate the study of ``obnoxious'' committee scoring rules when the voters' preferences are expressed via a metric space. To this end, we propose a model where large distances imply high satisfaction and study the egalitarian avatar of the well-known Chamberlin-Courant voting rule and some of its generalizations. For a given integer value $1 \le \lambda \le k$, the committee size k, a voter derives satisfaction from only the $\lambda$-th favorite committee member; the goal is to maximize the satisfaction of the least satisfied voter. For the special case of $\lambda = 1$, this yields the egalitarian Chamberlin-Courant rule. In this paper, we consider general metric space and the special case of a $d$-dimensional Euclidean space. We show that when $\lambda$ is $1$ and $k$, the problem is polynomial-time solvable in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and general metric space, respectively. However, for $\lambda = k-1$, it is NP-hard even in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Thus, we have ``double-dichotomy'' in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with respect to the value of {\lambda}, where the extreme cases are solvable in polynomial time but an intermediate case is NP-hard. Furthermore, this phenomenon appears to be ``tight'' for $\mathbb{R}^2$ because the problem is NP-hard for general metric space, even for $\lambda=1$. Consequently, we are motivated to explore the problem in the realm of (parameterized) approximation algorithms and obtain positive results. Interestingly, we note that this generalization of Chamberlin-Courant rules encodes practical constraints that are relevant to solutions for certain facility locations.

In MaxSAT with Cardinality Constraint problem (CC-MaxSAT), we are given a CNF-formula $\Phi$, and $k \ge 0$, and the goal is to find an assignment $\beta$ with at most $k$ variables set to true (also called a weight $k$-assignment) such that the number of clauses satisfied by $\beta$ is maximized. MaxCov can be seen as a special case of CC-MaxSAT, where the formula $\Phi$ is monotone, i.e., does not contain any negative literals. CC-MaxSAT and MaxCov are extremely well-studied problems in the approximation algorithms as well as parameterized complexity literature. Our first contribution is that the two problems are equivalent to each other in the context of FPT-Approximation parameterized by $k$ (approximation is in terms of number of clauses satisfied/elements covered). We give a randomized reduction from CC-MaxSAT to MaxCov in time $O(1/\epsilon)^{k} \cdot (m+n)^{O(1)}$ that preserves the approximation guarantee up to a factor of $1-\epsilon$. Furthermore, this reduction also works in the presence of fairness and matroid constraints. Armed with this reduction, we focus on designing FPT-Approximation schemes (FPT-ASes) for MaxCov and its generalizations. Our algorithms are based on a novel combination of a variety of ideas, including a carefully designed probability distribution that exploits sparse coverage functions. These algorithms substantially generalize the results in Jain et al. [SODA 2023] for CC-MaxSAT and MaxCov for $K_{d,d}$-free set systems (i.e., no $d$ sets share $d$ elements), as well as a recent FPT-AS for Matroid-Constrained MaxCov by Sellier [ESA 2023] for frequency-$d$ set systems., Comment: Abstract shortened due to arxiv restrictions

In liquid democracy, agents can either vote directly or delegate their vote to a different agent of their choice. This results in a power structure in which certain agents possess more voting weight than others. As a result, it opens up certain possibilities of vote manipulation, including control and bribery, that do not exist in standard voting scenarios of direct democracy. Here we formalize a certain kind of election control -- in which an external agent may change certain delegation arcs -- and study the computational complexity of the corresponding combinatorial problem., Comment: Accepted in 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems(AAMAS 2024)

For numerous graph problems in the realm of parameterized algorithms, using the size of a smallest deletion set (called a modulator) into well-understood graph families as parameterization has led to a long and successful line of research. Recently, however, there has been an extensive study of structural parameters that are potentially much smaller than the modulator size. In particular, recent papers [Jansen et al. STOC 2021; Agrawal et al. SODA 2022] have studied parameterization by the size of the modulator to a graph family $\mathcal{H}$ ($\textbf{mod}_{\mathcal{H}}$), elimination distance to $\mathcal{H}$ ($\textbf{ed}_{\mathcal{H}}$), and $\mathcal{H}$-treewidth ($\textbf{tw}_{\mathcal{H}}$). While these new parameters have been successfully exploited to design fast exact algorithms their utility (especially that of latter two) in the context of approximation algorithms is mostly unexplored. The conceptual contribution of this paper is to present novel algorithmic meta-theorems that expand the impact of these structural parameters to the area of FPT Approximation, mirroring their utility in the design of exact FPT algorithms. Precisely, we show that if a covering or packing problem is definable in Monadic Second Order Logic and has a property called Finite Integer Index, then the existence of an FPT Approximation Scheme (FPT-AS, i.e., ($1\pm \epsilon$)-approximation) parameterized these three parameters is in fact equivalent. As concrete exemplifications of our meta-theorems, we obtain FPT-ASes for well-studied graph problems such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, Cycle Packing and Dominating Set, parameterized by these three parameters., Comment: Full version of FSTTCS 2023 paper. Abstract shortened to meet the character limit

The property of countable metacompactness of a topological space gets its importance from Dowker's 1951 theorem that the product of a normal space X with the unit interval is again normal iff X is countably metacompact. In a recent paper, Leiderman and Szeptycki studied $\Delta$-spaces, which are a subclass of the class of countably metacompact spaces. They proved that a single Cohen real introduces a ladder system $L$ over the first uncountable cardinal for which the corresponding space $X_L$ is not a $\Delta$-space, and asked whether there is a ZFC example of a ladder system $L$ over some cardinal $\kappa$ for which $X_L$ is not countably metacompact, in particular, not a $\Delta$-space. We prove that an affirmative answer holds for the cardinal $\kappa=cf(\beth_{\omega+1})$. Assuming $\beth_\omega=\aleph_\omega$, we get an example at a much lower cardinal, namely $\kappa=2^{2^{2^{\aleph_0}}}$, and our ladder system $L$ is moreover $\omega$-bounded., Comment: Added a section "Club guessing with diamonds", where we address the case of omega-bounded ladder systems

A vertex of a plane digraph is bimodal if all its incoming edges (and hence all its outgoing edges) are consecutive in the cyclic order around it. A plane digraph is bimodal if all its vertices are bimodal. Bimodality is at the heart of many types of graph layouts, such as upward drawings, level-planar drawings, and L-drawings. If the graph is not bimodal, the Maximum Bimodal Subgraph (MBS) problem asks for an embedding-preserving bimodal subgraph with the maximum number of edges. We initiate the study of the MBS problem from the parameterized complexity perspective with two main results: (i) we describe an FPT algorithm parameterized by the branchwidth (and hence by the treewidth) of the graph; (ii) we establish that MBS parameterized by the number of non-bimodal vertices admits a polynomial kernel. As the byproduct of these results, we obtain a subexponential FPT algorithm and an efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme for MBS., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2023)

We study the \textsc{$\alpha$-Fixed Cardinality Graph Partitioning ($\alpha$-FCGP)} problem, the generic local graph partitioning problem introduced by Bonnet et al. [Algorithmica 2015]. In this problem, we are given a graph $G$, two numbers $k,p$ and $0\leq\alpha\leq 1$, the question is whether there is a set $S\subseteq V$ of size $k$ with a specified coverage function $cov_{\alpha}(S)$ at least $p$ (or at most $p$ for the minimization version). The coverage function $cov_{\alpha}(\cdot)$ counts edges with exactly one endpoint in $S$ with weight $\alpha$ and edges with both endpoints in $S$ with weight $1 - \alpha$. $\alpha$-FCGP generalizes a number of fundamental graph problems such as \textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph}, \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, and \textsc{Max $(k,n-k)$-Cut}. A natural question in the study of $\alpha$-FCGP is whether the algorithmic results known for its special cases, like \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover}, could be extended to more general settings. One of the simple but powerful methods for obtaining parameterized approximation [Manurangsi, SOSA 2019] and subexponential algorithms [Fomin et al. IPL 2011] for \textsc{Max $k$-Vertex Cover} is based on the greedy vertex degree orderings. The main insight of our work is that the idea of greed vertex degree ordering could be used to design fixed-parameter approximation schemes (FPT-AS) for $\alpha > 0$ and the subexponential-time algorithms for the problem on apex-minor free graphs for maximization with $\alpha > 1/3$ and minimization with $\alpha < 1/3$., Comment: Updated version of MFCS 2023 paper

In the Minimum Bisection problem, input is a graph $G$ and the goal is to partition the vertex set into two parts $A$ and $B$, such that $||A|-|B|| \le 1$ and the number $k$ of edges between $A$ and $B$ is minimized. This problem can be viewed as a clustering problem where edges represent similarity, and the task is to partition the vertices into two equally sized clusters, while minimizing the number of pairs of similar objects that end up in different clusters. In this paper, we initiate the study of a fair version of Minimum Bisection. In this problem, the vertices of the graph are colored using one of $c \ge 1$ colors. The goal is to find a bisection $(A, B)$ with at most $k$ edges between the parts, such that for each color $i\in [c]$, $A$ has exactly $r_i$ vertices of color $i$. We first show that Fair Bisection is $W$[1]-hard parameterized by $c$ even when $k = 0$. On the other hand, our main technical contribution shows that is that this hardness result is simply a consequence of the very strict requirement that each color class $i$ has {\em exactly} $r_i$ vertices in $A$. In particular, we give an $f(k,c,\epsilon)n^{O(1)}$ time algorithm that finds a balanced partition $(A, B)$ with at most $k$ edges between them, such that for each color $i\in [c]$, there are at most $(1\pm \epsilon)r_i$ vertices of color $i$ in $A$. Our approximation algorithm is best viewed as a proof of concept that the technique introduced by [Lampis, ICALP '18] for obtaining FPT-approximation algorithms for problems of bounded tree-width or clique-width can be efficiently exploited even on graphs of unbounded width. The key insight is that the technique of Lampis is applicable on tree decompositions with unbreakable bags (as introduced in [Cygan et al., SIAM Journal on Computing '14]). Along the way, we also derive a combinatorial result regarding tree decompositions of graphs., Comment: Full version of ESA 2023 paper. Abstract shortened to meet the character limit

We consider the following problem about dispersing points. Given a set of points in the plane, the task is to identify whether by moving a small number of points by small distance, we can obtain an arrangement of points such that no pair of points is ``close" to each other. More precisely, for a family of $n$ points, an integer $k$, and a real number $d > 0$, we ask whether at most $k$ points could be relocated, each point at distance at most $d$ from its original location, such that the distance between each pair of points is at least a fixed constant, say $1$. A number of approximation algorithms for variants of this problem, under different names like distant representatives, disk dispersing, or point spreading, are known in the literature. However, to the best of our knowledge, the parameterized complexity of this problem remains widely unexplored. We make the first step in this direction by providing a kernelization algorithm that, in polynomial time, produces an equivalent instance with $O(d^2k^3)$ points. As a byproduct of this result, we also design a non-trivial fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the problem, parameterized by $k$ and $d$. Finally, we complement the result about polynomial kernelization by showing a lower bound that rules out the existence of a kernel whose size is polynomial in $k$ alone, unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\text{poly}$.

Selection of a group of representatives satisfying certain fairness constraints, is a commonly occurring scenario. Motivated by this, we initiate a systematic algorithmic study of a \emph{fair} version of \textsc{Hitting Set}. In the classical \textsc{Hitting Set} problem, the input is a universe $\mathcal{U}$, a family $\mathcal{F}$ of subsets of $\mathcal{U}$, and a non-negative integer $k$. The goal is to determine whether there exists a subset $S \subseteq \mathcal{U}$ of size $k$ that \emph{hits} (i.e., intersects) every set in $\mathcal{F}$. Inspired by several recent works, we formulate a fair version of this problem, as follows. The input additionally contains a family $\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $\mathcal{U}$, where each subset in $\mathcal{B}$ can be thought of as the group of elements of the same \emph{type}. We want to find a set $S \subseteq \mathcal{U}$ of size $k$ that (i) hits all sets of $\mathcal{F}$, and (ii) does not contain \emph{too many} elements of each type. We call this problem \textsc{Fair Hitting Set}, and chart out its tractability boundary from both classical as well as multivariate perspective. Our results use a multitude of techniques from parameterized complexity including classical to advanced tools, such as, methods of representative sets for matroids, FO model checking, and a generalization of best known kernels for \textsc{Hitting Set}.

Clustering problems such as $k$-Median, and $k$-Means, are motivated from applications such as location planning, unsupervised learning among others. In such applications, it is important to find the clustering of points that is not ``skewed'' in terms of the number of points, i.e., no cluster should contain too many points. This is modeled by capacity constraints on the sizes of clusters. In an orthogonal direction, another important consideration in clustering is how to handle the presence of outliers in the data. Indeed, these clustering problems have been generalized in the literature to separately handle capacity constraints and outliers. To the best of our knowledge, there has been very little work on studying the approximability of clustering problems that can simultaneously handle both capacities and outliers. We initiate the study of the Capacitated $k$-Median with Outliers (C$k$MO) problem. Here, we want to cluster all except $m$ outlier points into at most $k$ clusters, such that (i) the clusters respect the capacity constraints, and (ii) the cost of clustering, defined as the sum of distances of each non-outlier point to its assigned cluster-center, is minimized. We design the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for C$k$MO. In particular, our algorithm returns a (3+\epsilon)-approximation for C$k$MO in general metric spaces, and a (1+\epsilon)-approximation in Euclidean spaces of constant dimension, that runs in time in time $f(k, m, \epsilon) \cdot |I_m|^{O(1)}$, where $|I_m|$ denotes the input size. We can also extend these results to a broader class of problems, including Capacitated k-Means/k-Facility Location with Outliers, and Size-Balanced Fair Clustering problems with Outliers. For each of these problems, we obtain an approximation ratio that matches the best known guarantee of the corresponding outlier-free problem., Comment: Abstract shortened to meet arxiv requirements

Designing coresets--small-space sketches of the data preserving cost of the solutions within $(1\pm \epsilon)$-approximate factor--is an important research direction in the study of center-based $k$-clustering problems, such as $k$-means or $k$-median. Feldman and Langberg [STOC'11] have shown that for $k$-clustering of $n$ points in general metrics, it is possible to obtain coresets whose size depends logarithmically in $n$. Moreover, such a dependency in $n$ is inevitable in general metrics. A significant amount of recent work in the area is devoted to obtaining coresests whose sizes are independent of $n$ (i.e., ``small'' coresets) for special metrics, like $d$-dimensional Euclidean spaces, doubling metrics, metrics of graphs of bounded treewidth, or those excluding a fixed minor. In this paper, we provide the first constructions of small coresets for $k$-clustering in the metrics induced by geometric intersection graphs, such as Euclidean-weighted Unit Disk/Square Graphs. These constructions follow from a general theorem that identifies two canonical properties of a graph metric sufficient for obtaining small coresets. The proof of our theorem builds on the recent work of Cohen-Addad, Saulpic, and Schwiegelshohn [STOC '21], which ensures small-sized coresets conditioned on the existence of an interesting set of centers, called ``centroid set''. The main technical contribution of our work is the proof of the existence of such a small-sized centroid set for graphs that satisfy the two canonical geometric properties. The new coreset construction helps to design the first $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation for center-based clustering problems in UDGs and USGs, that is fixed-parameter tractable in $k$ and $\epsilon$ (FPT-AS)., Comment: Full version of a paper accepted to SoCG 2023. Abstract shortened to meet the arXiv character limit

The study of fair algorithms has become mainstream in machine learning and artificial intelligence due to its increasing demand in dealing with biases and discrimination. Along this line, researchers have considered fair versions of traditional optimization problems including clustering, regression, ranking and voting. However, most of the efforts have been channeled into designing heuristic algorithms, which often do not provide any guarantees on the quality of the solution. In this work, we study matching problems with the notion of proportional fairness. Proportional fairness is one of the most popular notions of group fairness where every group is represented up to an extent proportional to the final selection size. Matching with proportional fairness or more commonly, proportionally fair matching, was introduced in [Chierichetti et al., AISTATS, 2019], where the problem was studied with only two groups. However, in many practical applications, the number of groups -- although often a small constant -- is larger than two. In this work, we make the first step towards understanding the computational complexity of proportionally fair matching with more than two groups. We design exact and approximation algorithms achieving reasonable guarantees on the quality of the matching as well as on the time complexity. Our algorithms are also supported by suitable hardness bounds.