Search

Silicone breast implants are widely prevalent. An increasing group of patients detail self-reported somatic and psychological symptoms that have been ascribed as breast implant illness (BII) and seek capsulectomy and implant removal. To guide consultations and shared decision making, more outcome data relating to this intervention are required. To present a multicentre study of patient-centred (n = 100) outcome data, following total capsulectomy with implant removal for BII. A questionnaire survey was cross-referenced with medical records. Collected data included demographics, operation details, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, overall self-perceived percentage improvement in BII symptoms and breast shape satisfaction ratings after explantation. The 10 most frequently self-reported symptoms were fatigue (81%), pains/aches (72%), brain/memory fog (56%), mood disturbances (36%), neuropathic pain (28%), hair loss (28%), headaches (25%), gastric symptoms/intolerances (24%), eczema/rash (18%) and vision disturbance (17%). A high proportion of patients (98%) experienced a 62 ± 4% average symptom improvement; most self-reported symptoms (21/28) improved significantly after explantation with total capsulectomy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients had high overall self-perceived BII percentage improvement (76 ± 3%) and satisfaction with breast shape numerical rating score (8 ± 0.30) postoperatively. Despite BII not being a defined disease entity, symptom association with silicone breast implants continues for a growing number of patients. It is important to recognise that in this patient group, capsulectomy and implant removal may not be curative, however we have demonstrated that symptom improvement can occur. It is very difficult to prove a causal link between breast implants and BII; to do so will require extensive prospective data collection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background While immediate breast reconstruction rates in breast cancer are increasing, they remain low in women over 65 years old. The aim was to investigate surgical outcomes in women older than 65 years receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. Method The population-based Stockholm Breast Reconstruction Database includes all adult women with breast cancer receiving an implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in Stockholm, Sweden, 2005–2015. Primary outcomes within 30 days from immediate breast reconstruction were: infection requiring antibiotics and reoperation on. Implant removal was a secondary outcome. Women more than 65 years were compared with younger age groups. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression were applied for the primary outcomes, and Kaplan–Meier analysis for the secondary outcome. Results Among 1749 cases of immediate breast reconstruction, 140 (8.0%) were in women more than 65 years. Median follow-up was 74 months (1–198). Postoperative infection was not more common in women older than 65 years old (22 of 140, 15.7%) than in women under 65 years old (303 of 1609, 18.8%; P = 0.221). Reoperation on was more frequent in women older than 65 years than in other age groups (more than 65: 8.6%; 50–64: 6.5%; 40–49: 3.5%; less than 40: 1.6%; P < 0.001), however, age older than 65 years was not an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR 1.00, 95% c.i. 0.44 to 2.28). Overall, 6-year probability of implant removal was 11.4%, (8.1% due to complications and 3.3% due to patient preference). There was no statistically significant difference between age groups for either reason (P = 0.085 and P = 0.794 respectively). Conclusion Older age alone was not associated with worse surgical outcomes after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in highly selected patients older than 65 years when compared with their younger counterparts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of volar locking plate (VLP) removal on functional scores. Methods: In this retrospective study, between January 2019 and January 2024, medical records of our institution were reviewed and patients who underwent VLP removal were included in the study. Demographic characteristics of the patients, follow-up time until VLP removal and reasons of VLP removal were evaluated from medical records. Preoperative and postoperative 3rd month Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were evaluated. Soong classification was performed on lateral wrist radiographs. Results: Thirty-eight patients (24 male, 14 female) patients were included in the study. The mean age of all patients was 51.23±15.6 years. The mean time from VLP fixation to implant removal was 17.42±12.42 months. Patients who underwent implant removal were evaluated according to the Soong classification. 18 of the patients (%47.36) were grade 0, 16 of the patients (%42.1) were grade 1 and 4 of the patients (%10.54) were grade 2. The most common removal reason was patient request (n=26, %68.42). Preoperative mean DASH score was 19.1 and postoperative 3rd month mean DASH score was 8.2. There was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative 3rd month DASH scores. (p<0.001) When patients were asked whether they would choose to implant removed again if they were in the same situation, %94.7 of the patients stated that they would choose implant removal again compared to those with only one previous cesarean section (p=0.015). Conclusion: VLP removal provided significant improvement in the patients' functional outcomes. The most common reason for VLP removal was patient request. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to describe a prospective clinical cohort of patients with silicone breast implants and suspected Breast Implant Illness (BII). Methods: Women were included in a specialized silicone outpatient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands. Baseline characteristics were collected including medical history, implant details, and symptoms. Experienced physicians categorized BII suspicion as high, moderate, or low, based on symptoms and after exclusion of other probable causes. Additionally, participants completed questionnaires assessing symptoms and daily life impact at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years. For this initial analysis, the results from the first three years of inclusions were collected. Results: Data from 353 women were collected from December 2020–December 2023. At baseline, the most reported symptoms were fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, and morning stiffness, accompanied by local symptoms in 83.3% of patients. At the clinic, 112 women were categorized as having high suspicion of BII, 147 women as moderate, and 94 women as low. At follow-up, 182 women (51.6%) opted for explantation. Following explantation, women with a high or moderate suspicion of BII experienced more significant symptom improvement, accompanied by a decrease in anxiety and a greater sense of control over their illness, compared to women with a low suspicion of BII. Conclusions: Our study highlights a distinct interplay of systemic and local symptoms among women with suspicion of BII. Women with a high or moderate BII suspicion benefit significantly more from explantation than women with low suspicion. Experienced physicians are pivotal in effectively assessing and guiding this patient group, highlighting the need for tailored clinical approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether thermal implant removal of osseointegrated implants is possible using a diode laser with an specific temperature–time interval. Materials and methods: First, tooth extraction of the first three premolars was performed in the maxilla and mandible on both sides of 10 pig. After 3 months, implants were inserted into the upper and lower jaws of 10 pigs. After 3 more months, osseointegrated implants were heated with a laser device to a temperature of 50 °C for 1 min. After 14 days, the implant stability quotient (ISQ), torque-out values, and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratio were assessed using resonance frequency analysis. Results: ISQ values showed no significant differences within each group or between the control and test groups. Furthermore, torque-out and BIC value measurements presented no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: At 50°C, changes in the BIC values were noticeably smaller; however, these differences were not significant. Future studies should evaluate the same procedures at either a higher temperature or longer intervals. Clinical relevance: With only 50 °C for 1 min, a dental implant will not de-integrate predictably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The topic of elective implant removal (IR) in healed fractures of the lower extremity remains controversial, particularly when unspecific symptoms of discomfort, which cannot be quantified, are the primary indication. This study aims to assess indications and outcomes of elective IR of the lower extremity, focusing on unspecific symptoms of discomfort and patient satisfaction postoperatively. Materials and methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single level I academic trauma center. We included patients who underwent elective IR for healed fractures of the ankle, foot, patella, and proximal tibia from 2016 to 2021. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 6 weeks after IR. Our outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction, complications, and alleviation of complaints. Results: A total of 167 patients were included in the study. Unspecific symptoms of discomfort were the most common reason for IR in all investigated anatomical regions of the lower extremity (47.9%), followed by pain (43.1%) and limited range of motion (4.2%). 4.8% of patients experienced a combination of pain and range of motion limitation. Among all patients, 47.9% reported subjective improvement after IR. IRs based on unspecific symptoms of discomfort were significantly less likely to show alleviation of complaints after IR (27.5%, OR 0.19, p ≤ 0.01). Patients who reported limited range of motion (OR 1.7, p = 0.41) or pain (OR 6.0, p = 0) were significantly more likely to be satisfied after IR. Patients who reported sensitivity to cold weather also showed a decrease of complaints after IR (OR 3.6, p = 0.03). Major complications occurred in 2.1% of cases. The minor complication rate was 8.4% (predominantly impaired wound healing). Smoking patients showed a significantly higher risk of complications after IR (OR 5.2, p = 0.006). Persistent pain postoperatively was detected in 14.7%. Conclusion: When elective IR for consolidated fractures of the lower extremity is primarily motivated by patients' subjective symptoms of discomfort, the risk for postoperative dissatisfaction significantly increases. Objective symptoms on the other hand are associated with higher satisfaction after IR. While the procedure is generally safe, minor complications such as wound healing disorders can occur, especially in smokers. Patient education and well-documented informed consent are critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Short-segment minimally invasive percutaneous spinal osteosynthesis has now become one of the treatments of choice to treat thoracolumbar fractures. The question of implant removal once the fracture has healed is still a matter of debate since this procedure can be associated with loss of sagittal correction. Therefore, we analyzed risk factors for kyphosis recurrence after spinal implants removal in patients treated with short-segment minimally invasive percutaneous spinal instrumentation for a thoracolumbar fracture. Methods: A total of 32 patients who underwent implant removal in percutaneous osteosynthesis for post-traumatic thoracolumbar fracture were enrolled in our study. Patient's medical record, operative report and imaging examinations carried out at the trauma and during the follow-up were analyzed. Results: Every patient experienced fracture union. Vertebral kyphotic angle (VKA) and Cobb angle (CA) improved significantly after stabilization surgery. VKA, CA, upper disk kyphotic angle (UDKA) and lower disk kyphotic angle (LDKA) significantly gradually decreased during follow-up. Traumatic disk injury (p: 0.001), younger age (p: 0.01), canal compromise (p: 0.04) and importance of surgical correction (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with kyphosis recurrence after implant removal. Anterior body augmentation did not affect loss of correction (CA and VKA) during the follow-up period (p: 0.57). Conclusion: Despite correction of the fracture after stabilization, we observed a progressive loss of correction over time appearing even before implant removal. Particular attention should be paid to post-traumatic disk damage or canal invasion, to young patients and to surgical overcorrection of the traumatic kyphosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS). Methods: All patients included in the ‘ROutine vs on DEmand removal Of the syndesmotic screw’ (RODEO) trial received the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Out of the 152 patients, 109 (71.7%) completed the mid-term follow-up questionnaire and were included in this study (53 treated with RR and 56 with ODR). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 43.0 to 56.0) since the initial surgical treatment of the acute syndesmotic injury. The primary outcome of this study consisted of the OMAS scores of the two groups. Results: The median OMAS score was 85.0 for patients treated with RR, and 90.0 for patients treated with ODR (p = 0.384), indicating no significant difference between ODR and RR. The secondary outcome measures included the AOFAS (88.0 in the RR group and 90.0 for ODR; p = 0.722), FAOS (87.5 in the RR group and 92.9 for ODR; p = 0.399), and EQ-5D (0.87 in the RR group and 0.96 for ODR; p = 0.092). Conclusion: This study demonstrated no functional difference comparing ODR to RR in syndesmotic injuries at a four year follow-up period, which supports the results of the primary RODEO trial. ODR should be the standard practice after syndesmotic screw fixation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(12):957–963.

Purpose: Elective implant removal (IR) in the upper extremity remains controversial. Implants in the olecranon and clavicle are commonly removed for prominence, unlike in the distal radius. Patient-reported symptomatic cannot be verified, and nonspecific discomfort remains unquantified. In this study, indications and outcomes of IR at the clavicle, olecranon and distal radius were evaluated, with a focus on postoperative patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, patients, who received elective IR of the clavicle, olecranon and distal radius were included. Patients were followed up at least six weeks after IR. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, and complications. Results: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included. Unspecific symptoms of discomfort were the most prevalent indication for IR (48.7%), followed by pain (29.6%) and objective limited range of motion (ROM) (7%). Pain and limited ROM combined was observed in 13.8%. Subjective benefit following IR was described in 54%. Patients with limited ROM (OR 4.7, p < 0.001) or pain (OR 4.1, p < 0.001) were more likely to experience alleviation of complaints. Patients with unspecific symptoms of discomfort, often did not report improvement. Major complications occurred in 2%. Refractures were detected at the clavicle (3.7%) and at the olecranon (2.5%). Minor complication rate was 5%. Conclusion: IR is a safe procedure in the upper extremity. Indications based on unspecific symptoms of discomfort have a significant lower rate of patient satisfaction postoperatively. Elective IR should be considered cautiously, if it is driven primarily by unspecific symptoms of discomfort. Patient education is relevant to prevent dissatisfying outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, a new generation of superior clavicle plates was developed featuring the variable-angle locking technology for enhanced screw positioning and a less prominent and optimized plate-to-bone fit design. On the other hand, minifragment plates in dual plating mode have demonstrated promising clinical results. The aim of the current study was to compare the biomechanical competence of single superior plating using the new-generation plate vs. dual plating using low-profile minifragment plates. Sixteen paired human cadaveric clavicles were pairwise assigned to 2 groups for instrumentation with either a superior 2.7-mm variable-angle locking compression plate (group 1), or with one 2.5-mm anterior combined with one 2.0-mm superior matrix mandible plate (group 2). An unstable clavicle shaft fracture (AO/OTA 15.2C) was simulated by means of a 5-mm osteotomy gap. Specimens were cyclically tested to failure under craniocaudal cantilever bending, superimposed with bidirectional torsion around the shaft axis, and monitored via motion tracking. Initial construct stiffness was significantly higher in group 2 (9.28 ± 4.40 N/mm) compared to group 1 (3.68 ± 1.08 N/mm), P =.003. The amplitudes of interfragmentary motions in terms of axial and shear displacement, fracture gap opening and torsion, over the course of 12,500 cycles were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2, P ≤.038. Cycles to 2 mm shear displacement were significantly lower in group 1 (22,792 ± 4346) compared to group 2 (27,437 ± 1877), P =.047. From a biomechanical perspective, low-profile 2.5/2.0-mm dual plates could be considered as a useful alternative for diaphyseal clavicle fracture fixation, especially in less common unstable fracture configurations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Implant removal in orthopaedics after fracture consolidation is a very common procedure but is still associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). Antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended but advocated by some. To assess the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of early SSI following orthopaedic implant removal. A monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who underwent orthopaedic implant removal procedures performed from 2016 to 2021 were included. A 1:1 propensity score matching function was used to create a cohort with matched baseline characteristics and associated risk factors for SSI. Inter-cohort comparison of the occurrence of SSI (superficial or deep) and revision surgery for SSI, after propensity score matching, was performed using the odds ratio to determine the effect of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. In total, 965 distinct surgical procedures were included. Of these, 69 (7.15%) had an SSI, 24 (35.7%) of which required surgical revision; 214 procedures (22.18%) were performed under preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The propensity-matched cohort consisted of 396 procedures (198 with and without antibiotic prophylaxis). The SSI rates were 11.11% and 3.03%, respectively, in the control and antibiotic prophylaxis groups (odds ratio: 0.25; 95% confidence interval: 0.099; 0.63; P = 0.011). No difference was found for revision surgery. Preoperative administration of antibiotic prophylaxis considerably reduces the risk of SSI during the removal of an orthopaedic implant without increasing the risk of side-effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Benefit of implant removal in spine surgery remains unclear. While there is mostly consensus about necessity of implant removal in posterior-only stabilized patients, the effect of this measure in cases with combined anterior-posterior stabilization is undetermined. With this work we present a retrospective analysis of 87 patients with traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures concerning quality of life (QOL), loss of correction (LOC) and range of motion (ROM). The effect of implant removal on the outcome 18–74 months after surgery was analyzed to determine how implant removal affects radiologic, functional and quality-of life-related parameters. Patients and methods: 87 patients suffering from a traumatic vertebral body fracture (T11 – L2) were included. Quality of life was determined using four different scoring systems (SF 36, VAS, Oswestry, LBOS). Clinical examination included range of motion. Radiologic findings were correlated with QOL. Results: Patients with removal of the internal fixator had a trend towards better range of motion than patients with posterior instrumentation left in place. Radiologic findings showed no correlation to QOL. Implant removal led to better values in Oswestry and SF-36. 69% of patients after removal reported a reduction of their symptoms.All patients with persistence of severe pain after implant removal belonged to subgroup II.2 (anterior monosegmental fusion with bone graft) Conclusion: Removal of the internal fixator can lead to a reduction of symptoms. Patient selection is crucial for successful indication. Radiologic findings do not correlate with QOL.

Pediatric pure discoligamentous Chance-type injury is relatively rare and the appropriate surgical method has not yet been established, particularly, whether spinal fixation with fusion or without fusion is more effective. This case report describes a 10-year-old-boy who sustained an L2-3 pure discoligamentous Chance-type injury following a car accident and underwent an L2-3 posterior fixation without fusion. The implants were removed after eight months of an uneventful postoperative course. However, four months later, the kyphotic deformity recurred. Although the deformity gradually progressed over nine months, the patient remained neurologically intact and asymptomatic. This report suggests that fixation without fusion may not be appropriate in pediatric patients with pure discoligamentous Chance-type injuries. Spinal fixation with fusion may be recommended to prevent loss of correction and ensure secure stabilization.

This case report describes a 13-year-old female patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and flat back who experienced progressive kyphotic deformity after implant removal despite obtaining physiological alignment postoperatively. The patient underwent multiple surgeries, and a late-developing infection complicated her treatment course. Despite hard bracing to prevent kyphotic change, the kyphosis progressed to 74° within a year after implant removal, leading to a decrease in patient height and back pain. Revision surgery was eventually necessary. Possible factors for the kyphotic progression include injury to paraspinal back muscles due to multiple surgeries or insufficient bony fusion from late-developing infection. This case highlights the importance of thorough evaluation and follow-up for optimal patient outcomes after implant removal in AIS patients, particularly those with flat back. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our study aimed to compare the biomechanical behaviour of mandibles with or without titanium miniplates when subjected to an impact after bone healing using a finite element model (FEM) of the human mandible. We simulated mandibular trauma on an FEM of a human mandible carrying or not two parasymphyseal miniplates and applying a concentrated force of 2000 N to four different areas, including the insertion area, the area straddling the edge of the miniplates and the adjacent bone, at a distance from the miniplates on the symphysis, and on the basilar border of the mandible below the miniplates. Then, we compared the Von Mises stress distributions between the two models. In the case of an impact on the miniplates, the maximum Von Mises stress occurred in two specific areas, on the cortical bone at the posterior border of the two miniplates at a distance from the impact, while in the model without miniplates, the Von Mises stresses were homogenously distributed in the impact area. The presence of titanium miniplates in the case of trauma affects the biomechanical behaviour of the mandible and could cause more complex fractures. We recommend informing patients of this potential risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Implant dentistry is considered to be a safe and routine surgical procedure. However, cases of life-threatening hematoma of the floor of the mouth resulting in airway obstruction were previously reported as a complication of implant placement in the anterior mandible. Massive bleeding in this anatomical site may be caused by perforating the lingual cortex and/or damaging the lingual perimandibular vessels. In the long term, dental implants can fail, mainly due to peri-implantitis, and must be removed. Explantation procedure may occasionally become a complex challenge, with a risk for various complications. Case report: This report presents the first case of life-threatening hematoma of the floor of the mouth, as a complication secondary to a failed attempt of dental implant removal at the anterior mandible. The proximity of the implant to the lingual vascular canal might have served as a cause for vascular damage during explantation. Conclusions: Implant removal complications are scarcely described in the literature. Nonetheless, damaging blood vessels during explantation should not be underestimated. Computed tomography (CT) may be of value not only in preoperative implant planning but also before implant removal in jeopardized anatomical zones such as the anterior mandible. Lingual vascular canals should be looked for on computed tomography scans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Double-plating methods are popular, with perpendicular and parallel plate methods being widely used surgical method for the rigid fixation of distal humeral fracture (DHF). However, which plate method is better for DHF remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes including the incidences of complications and reoperation between the two plate methods. Methods: We extracted 383 patients with DHF undergoing surgery between 2011 and 2020 from our multicenter database, which is named TRON. We divided the subjects into two groups: perpendicular plating group (Group A) and parallel plating group (Group B). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, patients were matched for age, sex, olecranon osteotomy, AO type, and type of injury. We assessed the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at 3 and 6 months and the last follow-up month as the clinical outcome. We investigated the incidences of complications and reoperations in both groups. Results: After matching, each group comprised 50 patients. There was no significant difference between Group A versus Group B in MEPS score at each time point. The incidence of implant removal in Group B was higher than that in Group A (26.5% vs 50%, p = 0.023). Discussion: Although there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complications between the two groups, the incidence of implant removal was higher in Group B than in Group A. In the parallel plate technique, where the plates have to be placed in areas with thin subcutaneous soft tissue, the incidence of implant removal might be high due to the discomfort caused by the implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study objective was to evaluate sagittal correction loss after instrumentation removal in patients treated for thoracic or lumbar compression fractures treated with SpineJack® kyphoplasty associated with short percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study was carried out in three major French trauma centers. All patients with a single type A thoracic or lumbar fracture, treated by the studied technique between 2017 and 2020, have been included. Demographic data, fracture type, removal procedure achievement and term were collected. Radiological parameters were measured at five timepoints: pre-operative, intra-operative, immediate post-operative, early post-operative (< 3 months) and at follow-up (1 year). Vertebral wedge angle (angle between the two endplates of the fractured vertebra) and traumatic regional angulation (TRA—calculated by subtracting regional kyphosis from the physiological reference values). Results: 150 patients were included. Mean age was 48.6 ± 17.8 years. Average follow-up was 14.4 ± 3 months. 82 patients had secondary instrumentation removal. Mean time to removal was 6.4 ± 2.4 months. TRA correction loss between immediate post-operative and last follow-up was greater in removal group: 5.1 ± 5.6° versus 2.7 ± 4.7° (p = 0.01). Material was removed earlier in younger patients (p = 0.002). TRA correction loss was similar in the early and late removal groups (p = 0.83). Multivariate analysis identified only Magerl/AO A3 fractures as risk factor for loss of TRA correction (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Instrumentation removal was associated with good radiological outcomes with a non-significant loss of vertebral wedge angle and tolerable loss of traumatic regional angulation (+ 2.4° compared to the no-removal group), even if performed early. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The popularity of breast augmentation has seen a decrease in number in the recent years. Simultaneously, the request for breast implant removal has increased impressively. A total of 77 women undergoing breast implant removal with no exchange were divided into four groups depending on the type of "reverse surgery" following the explantation: simple implant removal, implant removal with lipofilling, implant removal with mastopexy, and implant removal with mastopexy and lipofilling. Following this, an algorithm was created to standardize the ideal " reverse " surgery. After surgery, all the patients were followed for at least 6 months to understand their level of satisfaction regarding the outcome of the surgery. The majority of patients were highly satisfied after explantation. Implant-related issues were found to be the main cause for explantation surgery. Capsulectomy was performed in the minority of cases, as the capsule was found to be an ideal layer for fat grafting. Grouping the patients into 4 categories allowed us to investigate a pattern behind the decision to undergo a certain type of secondary procedure and to create an algorithm with general rules that can be used as a guide for surgeons. The increased demand for this type of surgery underlines a new interesting trend in plastic surgery that, together with Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma advent, will probably have implications on the communication between surgeons and patients and most likely on the choice of choosing different ways of breast volume augmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case summary: The aim of this clinical case presentation was to describe the effect of a 4.7 mg deslorelin implant placement in a pregnant queen during the second half of gestation, and the consequences of its removal on the pregnancy and parturition. A 5-year-old female cat exhibiting nesting behaviour and weight gain 10 days after placement of a deslorelin implant was presented for examination. Gestation was confirmed on ultrasound, with two well-formed kittens of a gestational age of approximately 7 weeks. The deslorelin implant placed on the umbilicus was removed 1 week later. No change in the pregnancy was observed after removal of the implant. The fetuses showed no signs of distress on ultrasound and radiography examination 4 days after removal of the implant. One week after implant removal, the queen naturally delivered two healthy kittens. The queen showed maternal behaviour with normal milk production. Relevance and novel information: In the light of the lack of literature on implant injection and removal in the pregnant queen, this case report showcases a successful birth of healthy kittens without any subsequent adverse effect on the queen. Further study is needed to assess the safety of implant removal during pregnancy and potential use as a means to induce fertile oestrus in the queen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The recommendation of breast lift surgery in the setting of patients requiring breast implant removal is twofold. First, a breast lift is indicated for patients who present with breast mound or nipple-areolar complex ptosis. Second, a breast lift is indicated to accommodate the forecasted redundancy in skin and breast ptosis created by implant explantation. The most popular approaches to mastopexy include the inferior and superior pedicled breast lifts. We present a surgical algorithm with diagrams and cases clarifying mastopexy approaches for patients desiring breast implant removal in patients presenting with breast implant illness syndrome. Methods: An algorithm was developed to explain the process for selecting the ideal pedicle approach for mastopexy and implant removal surgeries. Results: Three cases are presented to illustrate the application of each pedicle under different presentations and goals. Conclusions: Advantages of an inferior pedicle include the capacity for unlimited lifting of the nipple-areola complex and for preservation of maximal breast mound volume. Its disadvantages include the inability to remove the breast capsule simultaneously and contraindicated if the lower breast pole is contracted. The advantages of a superior pedicle include the ability to remove the entire capsule and to eliminate lower breast pole if it is contracted. Its disadvantages include limitations to how high the nipple-areola complex can be lifted and the inability to preserve maximal breast mound volume. With the current trend for the request of implant removal in patients presenting with breast implant illness syndrome, the algorithm presented may assist surgeons with selecting the ideal breast lift and implant removal approach. Level of Evidence IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Obere Extremitat is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

INTRODUCTION: Elective implant removal following healed extremity fractures remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the reasons and outcomes of implant removal after uneventful healing of limb fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective single-centre observational cohort study. Patients who sustained upper or lower extremity fractures that were fixed and healed uneventfully were included in the study when they elected to remove the implants. Patients were followed for six months post-operatively. Outcomes were assessed with patient satisfaction, symptoms resolution, and complications RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were recruited from October 2016 to March 2019. Thirty-six patients (37 implants) were symptomatic. Pain and prominence were the most common complaints, present in 59.5% and 33.3% of patients, respectively. Cold weather pain was also not uncommon (19.0%). Pain improved in 91.3% of the patients who complained of pain. The 94.6% symptomatic patients had at least partial resolution of pre-operative symptoms. All the patients who completed follow-up were satisfied with the procedure. In two patients, there were broken and retained screws intra-operatively. Post-operative complication rate was 23.8%, although no major complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Implant removal after uneventful healing of extremity fractures is a safe procedure that conferred a predictable relief of symptoms and satisfactory outcomes in most.

Purpose: Syndesmotic screw removal following acute syndesmotic injury is a commonly performed procedure. However, recent studies suggest that the removal does not result in improved patient reported outcome, while the procedure has proved not to be without complications. The aim of this study was to present a health-economic evaluation of on-demand removal (ODR) compared to routine removal (RR) of the syndesmotic screw. Methods: Data were collected from the RODEO trial, a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing functional outcome of ODR with RR. Economic evaluation resulted in total costs, costs (in Euro) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and costs per point improvement on the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). This included both direct and indirect costs. Results: Total costs for ODR were significantly lower with a mean difference of 3160 euro compared to RR (p < 0.001). The difference in QALY was not significant. The difference in OMAS at 12 months was 1.79 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €-1763 (p = 0.512). The ICER was well below the willingness to pay. Although unit costs might vary between hospitals and countries, these results provide relevant data of cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of both ODR and RR can be considered equal. The costs are lower for patients treated with ODR, which leads to the conclusion that ODR is cost-effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Fracture-related infection (FRI) represents a challenging clinical scenario. Limited evidence exists regarding treatment failure after initial management of FRI. The objective of our investigation was to determine incidence and risk factors for treatment failure in FRI. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated for FRI between 2011 and 2015 at three level 1 trauma centers. One hundred and thirty-four patients treated for FRI were identified. Demographic and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record. Treatment failure was defined as the need for repeat debridement or surgical revision seven or more days after the presumed final procedure for infection treatment. Univariate comparisons were conducted between patients who experienced treatment failure and those who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent associations with treatment failure. Results: Of the 134 FRI patients, 51 (38.1%) experienced treatment failure. Patients who failed were more likely to have had an open injury (31% versus 17%; p = 0.05), to have undergone implant removal (p = 0.03), and additional index I&D procedures (3.3 versus 1.6; p < 0.001). Most culture results identified a single organism (62%), while 15% were culture negative. Treatment failure was more common in culture-negative infections (p = 0.08). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common organism associated with treatment failure (29%; p = 0.08). Multivariate regression demonstrated a statistically significant association between treatment failure and two or more irrigation and debridement (I&D) procedures (OR 13.22, 95% CI 4.77–36.62, p < 0.001) and culture-negative infection (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.26–17.83, p = 0.02). Conclusions: The rate of treatment failure following FRI continues to be high. Important risk factors associated with treatment failure include open fracture, implant removal, and multiple I&D procedures. While MRSA remains common, culture-negative infection represents a novel risk factor for failure, suggesting aggressive treatment of clinically diagnosed cases remains critical even without positive culture data. Level of evidence: Retrospective cohort study; Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The traditional method of treating fibular fractures in unstable ankle injuries involves open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screw construct. Less invasive percutaneous fixation techniques with intramedullary fibular screws have been utilized for many years to reduce wound and implant complications while maintaining a stable ankle mortise. However, there have been no direct case-control studies comparing percutaneous intramedullary fibular screw fixation to the traditional open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. In our study, we compared radiographic and clinical outcomes for unstable ankle fractures in which the fibula fracture was treated with either a percutaneous intramedullary screw or by open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screw construct. We retrospectively reviewed 69 consecutive patients from 2011 to 2019 with unstable ankle fractures treated with intramedullary fibular screws and compared them to 216 case-control patients treated with traditional plate and screw construct over the same time period. The average follow-up for the intramedullary screw group was 11.5 months and 15.2 months for the plate and screw group. We collected general demographic data, measured intraoperative and final follow-up talocrural angles, Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade, union rates, implant removal rates, infection rates, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores. The intramedullary screw group had a statistically significant lower rate of delayed implant removal (8.7% vs 23.6%) and there was no detectable difference in other measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionPedicle screw fixation (PSF) has been the standard therapy for the treatment of various spinal diseases. Although complications are identified regularly, iatrogenic vascular injury is one of the rare but life-threatening complications. In this literature, we describe the first case of inferior vena cava (IVC) injury during pedicle screw removal.Case descriptionA 31-year-old man was treated by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for an L1 compression fracture. After a year, the fracture healed well and hardware removal surgery was performed. During the procedure, the hardware on the right was removed unremarkably except for the L2 pedicle screw which slipped into the retroperitoneum because of the improper technique. The CT angiogram revealed the screw had breached the anterior cortex of the L2 vertebral body and penetrated the IVC. After multidisciplinary cooperation, the defect of IVC was reconstructed and the L2 screw was removed from the posterior approach in the end.ResultThe patient recovered well and was discharged after 3 weeks without further events. The removal of the contralateral implants was unremarkable at 7 months postoperatively. At the 3-year follow-up, the patient returned to his normal daily activity without any complaints.ConclusionAlthough pedicle screw removal is a rather simple procedure, severe complications may have occurred from this procedure. Surgeons should keep vigilant to avoid the complication noted in this case.

Introduction: Routine orthopedic implant removal surgery (OIRS) in patients with no implant-related symptoms after union is controversial. Various factors, such as various fracture sites, fracture types, and accompanying fractures at other sites, act as error variables in the evaluation of routine OIRS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of orthopedic implant removal surgery (OIRS) in patients with no implant-related symptoms such as infection and soft tissue irritation after union of isolated lower extremity shaft fractures from a patient-centered evaluation Materials and methods: Eighty-four patients who achieved fracture union after internal fixation of femoral shaft or tibial shaft fractures (March 2004 to December 2018) and who showed no implant-related symptoms were evaluated retrospectively. Minimum post-OIRS follow-up period was 1 year. Thirty-eight patients were treated with intramedullary nail and 13 were treated with plate and screws for femoral shaft fracture. Twenty patients were treated with intramedullary nail and 13 were treated with plate and screws for tibial shaft fracture. All patients subsequently underwent OIRS. Quality of life (QoL) and lower extremity pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated 1 day before OIRS. Patient satisfaction with the OIRS, VAS, and QoL were assessed at least 1 year after OIRS using the SF-36 questionnaire. Results: The physical component score, mental component score, and scores of all eight domains showed significant improvement after OIRS (p < 0.01). Patients with femoral shaft fractures tended to have lower pre- and post-OIRS SF-36 scores than those with tibial shaft fracture. Among patients with femoral shaft fracture, SF-36 scores were comparable in the nail and plate groups. Among patients with tibial shaft fracture, nail group showed relatively better QoL than the plate group, before and after OIRS in spite of several complications such as formation of scar tissue, nerve damage, and refracture. Conclusions: Patients with no implant-related symptoms showed significant improvement in QoL and satisfaction after OIRS. This suggests that OIRS is beneficial from the patients' evaluation. Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the available literature for postoperative fracture rates following implant removal in the pediatric population. Methods: A systematic review of articles in the PubMed and Embase computerized literature databases from January 2000 to June 2022 was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, cohort studies (retrospective and prospective), and case series involving pediatric patients that included data on fracture rate following removal of orthopedic implants were eligible for review. Two authors independently extracted data from selected studies for predefined data fields for implant type, anatomic location of the implant, indication for implantation, fracture or refracture rate following implant removal, mean time to implant removal, and mean follow-up time. Results: Fifteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Reported fracture rates following implant removal vary based on several factors, with an overall reported incidence of 0%–14.9%. The available literature did not offer sufficient data for conduction of a meta-analysis. Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrates that fracture following implant removal in pediatric patients is a relatively frequent complication. In children, the forearm and femur are the most commonly reported sites of fracture following removal of implants. Traumatic fractures treated definitively with external fixation have the highest reported aggregate rate of refracture. Knowledge of the incidence of this risk is important for orthopedic surgeons. There remains a need for well-designed studies and trials to further clarify the roles of the variables that contribute to this complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the efficacies of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and the three cannulated screws fixation (3CS) as therapeutic options for femoral neck fractures. Method This was a retrospective study involving 69 patients (26 males and 43 females; mean age of 54.9 years (range, 28–66 years)) subjected to either FNS or 3CS for femoral neck fracture therapy. These patients were treated in our hospital from October 2019 to May 2020. Patient follow up was done at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. During the short‐term (6 months) follow‐up period, surgical procedures for the two groups and incidences of complications were analyzed. Perioperative parameters were recorded and analyzed. Postoperative hip joint functions were measured and compared using the Harris score. The assessed perioperative parameters included surgical time, hemoglobin loss, fluoroscopy duration, hospitalization length and hospitalization cost. The main complications at last follow‐up (6 months) included varus tilting, femoral neck shortness, and implant removal. Results Differences in the number of patients, age, Garden type of fracture and time from injury to surgery between the two groups were not significant (P > 0.05). With regards to perioperative parameters, compared to 3CS, FNS treatment performed better in surgical time (60.00 ± 12.44 vs 76.81 ± 13.10 min, P = 0.000), blood loss (13.67 ± 8.02 vs 16.58 ± 4.16 g/L, P = 0.059) and fluoroscopy time (39.73 ± 9.57 vs 58.14 ± 9.15 s, P = 0.000). Differences in hospitalization length and cost between the groups were not significant (P > 0.05). During the whole follow‐up period, all patients did not exhibit dysfunction, pulmonary embolism or even death as a result of long‐term immobilization of affected limbs. Surgical incisions for all patients healed well without infections. During the 6‐month follow‐up period, the FNS group exhibited a higher Harris score (84.61 ± 3.42 vs 78.67 ± 3.72, p = 0.000). In addition, treatment‐associated complications (FNS vs 3CS) included femoral neck varus tilt (3.03% vs 11.11%), femoral neck shortness (6.06% vs 13.89%), and implant removal (0% vs. 13.89%). Implant removal rate for the FNS group was significantly less than that of the 3CS group (P = 0.026). Differences in incidences of femoral neck varus tilt (P = 0.196) and femoral neck shortness (P = 0.282) between the two groups were not significant. However, the difference in number was significant (FNS group was less). Conclusion FNS treatment is associated with a smaller surgical trauma, stronger stability, and reductions in post‐operative complication incidences, therefore, it is a potential therapeutic option for femoral neck fractures.

Titanium implants are commonly used for surgical fixation in orthopedic trauma, and have many benefits compared to stainless steel implants. Despite these benefits, some orthopedic surgeons remain hesitant to use titanium implants due to concerns of difficulty with future implant removal, given concerns with cold-welding and screw strippage. The objective of this study was to assess difficulties associated with titanium plate and screw implant removal. This is a retrospective case series from a large hospital system. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 20,680 from 2017 to 2020. Patients were included if they had removal of titanium plate and screws from the upper or lower extremity, were at least18 years of age, and considered skeletally mature. The ease of titanium plate/screw removal was determined by assessing for implant cold-welding, broken screws, stripped screws, and the need for advanced tools (screw removal set, trephine, burr). 157 patients were identified, with a mean age of 54 years and 59 % female. In total 1274 screws were removed: 14 (1.1 %) were stripped, 8 (0.6 %) were cold-welded, 42 (3.3 %) were loose, and 13 (1.0 %) were broken. 183 plates were removed in total, and 15 (8.2 %) had bone overgrowth that required removal. 12 (7.6 %) procedures were complicated and required the use of advanced tools. Complicated implant removal operations occurred after significantly longer in vivo implant time (mean of 3.7 vs. 1.1 years, p = 0.036), were associated with a younger age, were more likely to occur in lower extremity procedures (p = 0.034), and took significantly longer time for removal (95 vs. 42 min, p < 0.001). Despite concerns with titanium implants, we found a low rate of screw strippage, breakage, and cold welding during the removal process. However, 7.6 % of the 157 surgeries required additional tools other than just a screwdriver, and needed additional operative time. This information allows treating surgeons to plan for implant removal when titanium implants have been used for fixation. IV [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a subset of glaucoma surgery that is known for its low rate of complications both intraoperatively and postoperatively compared to traditional filtering surgery. We present a case of a patient who, after receiving uncomplicated cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and concurrent iStent trabecular bypass stent implantation, experienced recurrent episodes of spontaneous microhyphema and inflammation in the late postoperative period. The patient, who had a history of mild asymmetric exfoliative glaucoma but no identifiable sources of trauma, underwent extensive examination to investigate causes of his episodic anterior segment bleeding and mild inflammation with concurrent elevated intraocular pressure. Given the circumstances of the patient’s recurrent symptoms and a negative workup for conventional causes of recurrent hyphema, it was suspected that the patient’s iStent was interacting with the patient’s peripheral iris, causing microtrauma and hyphema. We hypothesized that this contact was potentially exacerbated by pre-existing exfoliation syndrome, which caused zonular weakness and subsequent anterior movement of the lens-iris diaphragm. After the patient’s third recurrence of microhyphema and inflammation, the patient underwent removal of iStent and concurrent OMNI canaloplasty for glaucoma. Six months post-iStent explantation, the patient has had complete resolution of symptoms without recurrence of hyphema. In this case report, we outline the course of this patient’s symptoms and diagnosis, discuss the potential of MIGS devices such as iStent to cause recurrent hyphema, and explore treatment options following removal.

Introduction: Metallic implant inserted for orthopedic fracture fixation may be removed for a variety of reasons. There is little consensus if such implant be removed routinely after fracture union. Hence, in our study, we would like to determine the indications for implant removal. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of all cases of implant removal at the Orthopaedic Department of Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India, from January 2019 to December 2020. Relevant information of patients were extracted and analyzed. Results: The study included 217 patients; there are 161 males and 56 females with a male-to-female ratio of 2.87. The peak age group is 16–30 years with a mean age group of 36.2 years. Distal tibia/ankle (15.66%) is the most common site for implant removal. Tibia (35.4%) is the most common bone. Plates and screws (38.7%) is the most common implant. Patients' request (31.7%) is the most common indication followed by surgeon request (25.8%), prominent hardware (21.6%), infection (17.5%), and failure (3.4%). About 37.7% of implants were removed before 12 months. Conclusion: Patients' request was the most common indication as they wanted implant to be removed and long-term effects of internal implant were not known. Surgeon request is the second most common indication, especially in the pediatric age. Prominent hardware was the third most common indication group as implants were impinging. Infection and implant failure were the other mandatory indications for implant removal.

Abstract Background Posterior pedicle screw fixation without fusion has been commonly applied for thoracolumbar burst fracture. Implant removal is performed secondarily after bone union. However, the occurrence of secondary kyphosis has recently attracted attention. Secondary kyphosis results in poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this was to determine predictors of kyphosis after implant removal following posterior pedicle screw fixation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 59 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who underwent implant removal following posterior pedicle screw fixation without fusion. Inclusion criteria were non-osteoporotic fracture and T11-L3 burst fracture. Old age, sex, initial severe wedge deformity, initial severe kyphosis, and vacuum phenomenon were examined as factors potentially associated with final kyphotic deformity (defined as kyphotic angle greater than 25°) or loss of correction. Logistic regression analysis was performed using propensity score matching. Results Among the 31 female and 28 male patients (mean age 38 years), final kyphotic deformity was found in 17 cases (29%). Multivariate analysis showed a significant association with the vacuum phenomenon. Loss of correction was found in 35 cases (59%) and showed a significant association with the vacuum phenomenon. There were no significant associations with other factors. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that the vacuum phenomenon before implant removal may be a predictor of secondary kyphosis of greater than 25° after implant removal following posterior pedicle screw fixation without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture, but that old age, sex, initial severe kyphosis, and initial severe wedge deformity may not be predictors.

Abstract Background Posttraumatic shoulder stiffness remains a problem after proximal humerus fracture (PHF) despite good healing rates. The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether the implant material and overlying soft tissue have an effect on shoulder range of motion (ROM) before and after implant removal (IR). Methods 16 patients (mean age 55.2 ± 15.3 (SD) years; 62.5% female) were included who underwent operative treatment with locking plates of either carbon fiber reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) (PEEKPower® humeral fracture plate, Arthrex, Naples, Florida, USA, n = 8) or titanium alloy (Ti) (Philos®, DePuy Synthes, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Raynham, Massachusetts, USA, n = 8) for PHF. All patients presented with a limited ROM and persistent pain in everyday life after the fracture had healed, whereupon IR was indicated. ROM before and after IR were compared as well as the Constant Score (CS) and the CS compared to the contralateral shoulder (%CS) 1 year after IR. Results In group PEEK, elevation was 116.3° ± 19.2° pre- and 129.4° ± 23.7° post-IR (p = 0.027). External rotation was 35.0° ± 7.6° pre- and 50.6° ± 21.8° post-IR (p = 0.041). External rotation with the humerus abducted 90° was 38.8° ± 18.1° pre- and 52.5° ± 25.5° post-IR (p = 0.024). In group Ti, elevation was 110.0° ± 34.6° pre- and 133.8° ± 31.1° post-IR (p = 0.011). External rotation with the humerus at rest was 33.8° ± 23.1° pre- and 48.8° ± 18.7° post-IR (p = 0.048). External rotation with the humerus abducted 90° was 40.0° ± 31.6° pre- and 52.5° ± 22.5° post-IR (p = 0.011). Comparison of the two implant materials showed no significant difference. The overall CS was 90.3 ± 8.8, the %CS was 91.8% ± 14.7%. Conclusion There was no significant difference in ROM, CS and %CS with respect to plate materials, although lower cell adhesion is reported for the hydrophobic PEEK. However, all patients showed improved functional outcomes after IR in this pilot study. In patients with shoulder stiffness following locked plating for PHF, implants should be removed and open arthrolysis should be performed, independently from the hardware material. Level of evidence II

Enthusiasm for long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is growing among donors and NGOs throughout the global reproductive health field. There is an emerging concern, however, that the push to insert these methods has not been accompanied by a commensurate push for access to method removal. We use data from 17 focus group discussions with women of reproductive age in an anonymized African setting to understand how users approach providers to request method removal, and how they understand whether or not such a request will be granted. Focus group participants described how providers took on a gatekeeping role to removal services, adjudicating which requests for LARC removal they deemed legitimate enough to be granted. Participants reported that providers often did not consider a simple desire to discontinue the method to be a good enough reason to remove LARC, nor the experience of painful side-effects. Respondents discussed the deployment of what we call legitimating practices, in which they marshalled social support, medical evidence, and other resources to convince providers that their request for removal was indeed serious enough to be honored. This analysis examines the starkly gendered nature of contraceptive coercion, in which women are expected to bear the brunt of contraceptive side-effects, while men are expected to tolerate no inconvenience at all, even vicarious. This evidence of contraceptive coercion and medical misogyny demonstrates the need to center contraceptive autonomy not only at the time of method provision, but at the time of desired discontinuation as well.

INTRODUCTION: After the union of fracture, implant removal becomes a common elective orthopaedic procedure . The benefits of implant removal have not been sufficiently proven .So in our study we like to determine the outcome for implant removal in varies conditions and complications associated with it after removal of implants MATERIALS & METHODS:This is a descriptive study of all cases of implant removal at the Orthopaedic Department of Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India, from October 2020 to September 2021. Relevant information of patients were extracted and analyzed RESULTS: Study included 68 patients, there are 49 males, 19 females with male to female ratio of 2.57. Peak age group is < 15 years with mean age group of 32.5 years. Forearm(25%) is the most common site for implant removal . Plates and screws 21(31%) is the most common implant. Patient request 29(43%) is the most common indication followed by surgeon request 18 (26%) prominent hardware 14(20%) and infection 7(11%). About 40 percent of implants were removed after 24 months. Incomplete removal was the most common complication about 50% of complication followed by tissue damage(30%), infection (20%), nerve injury(10%) .85 percent of patients were fully satisfied. CONCLUSION: Implant removal is relatively safe surgery with high patient satisfaction. To enhance the satisfaction of implant removal surgery it is imperative to have implant removal specific equipments with counselling of patients and to manage potential complications. The definitive relation between psychological factors, satisfaction and physiological improvement needs further investigations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]