Search

The implementation of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) therapy in the real-world setting is hindered by logistical and financial barriers, impacting timely access to this life-saving treatment. Clinical trials have reported the time from leukapheresis to CAR T cell infusion (vein-to-vein time) but not the time from CAR T referral to infusion (decision-to-vein time). Herein, we report the barriers to CAR T therapy in a real-world setting. We evaluated the factors influencing the decision-to-vein time and explored the association with clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received CAR T therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who underwent consultation for CAR T cell therapy at Levine Cancer Institute and Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and collected information regarding demographic data, referral type, insurance type, CAR T product, and survival outcomes. The effects of variables on decision-to-vein time were analyzed by Fisher's exact test for categorial variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models. The study included 142 patients who were referred for CAR T of which 99 patients received CAR T. Median decision-to-vein time was 62 days compared to median vein-to-vein time of 32 days. Patients with private insurance took longer to obtain financial clearance compared to patients with government insurance (median 25 versus 9 days, P < .001). Of those with private insurance (n = 63), 35% needed a single-case agreement (SCA) which led to significant delay in receiving financial clearance (median 50.5 versus 19 days, P < .001) and increased decision-to-vein time (median 75 versus 55 days, P < .001) compared to those who did not need SCA. Decision-to-vein time was significantly different among various products, clinical trial being the shortest (median 47 days, n = 9) and non-conforming products being the longest (median 94.5 days, n = 6) (P< .001). Axi-cel had the shortest median decision-to-vein time at 61 days compared to 81 days with tisa-cel and 85 days with liso-cel. Although delays in receiving CAR T therapy did not impact survival, the median overall survival for patients who were referred for CAR T therapy but did not receive it, was significantly lower than those who received CAR T cell therapy (9.0 versus 21.0 months, P < .001). Decision-to-vein time is a major cause of delay in receiving CAR T therapy. SCAs lead to significant increase in decision-to-vein time leading to delays in CAR T therapy in a real-world setting. Patients who were referred for CAR T but are not able to receive it, have inferior survival compared to CAR T recipients. Our findings underscore the significance of addressing administrative hurdles, such as SCAs and insurance approvals, for timely access to CAR T therapy for patients with DLBCL., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy represents a novel treatment with curative potential for relapsed or refractory (R/R) LBCL, but there are access barriers to this innovative therapy that are not well-studied. Study objectives were: (1) Assess the impact of geographic factors and social determinants of health (SDOH) on access to treatment with CAR T in a sample of patients with R/R LBCL and ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT). (2) Compare and contrast patient characteristics, SDOH, and travel time between patients with R/R LBCL who received CAR T and those who did not. An observational, nested case-control study of patients with R/R LBCL, ≥2 prior LOT, not in a clinical trial, identified using 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service and national multi-payer claims databases. Patients were linked to near-neighborhood SDOH using 9-digit ZIP-code address. Driving distance and time between residence and nearest CAR T treatment center (TC) was calculated. Patients were stratified based on treatments received upon third LOT initiation (Index Date) or later: (1) received CAR T and (2) did not receive CAR T. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with CAR T. 5011 patients met inclusion criteria, with 628 (12.5%) in the CAR T group. Regression models found the likelihood of receiving CAR T decreased with patient age (odds ratio [OR] = .96, P < .001), and males were 29% more likely to receive CAR T (OR = 1.29, P = .02). Likelihood of CAR T increased with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; OR = 1.07, P < .001) indicating patients with more comorbidities were more likely to receive CAR T. Black patients were less than half as likely to receive CAR T than White patients (OR = .44, P = .01). Asian patients did not significantly differ from White patients (OR = 1.43, P = .24), and there was a trend for Hispanic patients to have a slightly lower likelihood of CAR T (OR = .50, P = .07). Higher household income was associated with receipt of CAR T, with the lowest income group more than 50% less likely to receive CAR T than the highest (OR = .44, P = .002), and the second lowest income group more than 30% less likely (OR = .68, P = .02). Finally, likelihood of CAR T therapy was reduced when the driving time to the nearest TC was 121 to 240 minutes (reference group: ≤30 minutes; OR = .64, P = .04). Travel times between 31 and 121 or greater than 240 minutes were not significantly different from ≤30 minutes. Payer type was collinear with age and could not be included in the regression analysis, but patients with commercial insurance were 1.5 to 3 times more likely to receive CAR T than other payers on an unadjusted basis. We identified significant disparities in access to CAR T related to demographics and SDOH. Patients who were older, female, low income, or Black were less likely to receive CAR T. The positive association of CCI with CAR T requires further research. Given the promising outcomes of CAR T, there is urgent need to address identified disparities and increase efforts to overcome access barriers., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We evaluated physicians' willingness to trade-off benefits, risks and time to infusion for CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Materials & methods: In a discrete-choice experiment survey, 150 US oncologists/hematologists chose between two hypothetical CAR T-cell treatments defined by six attributes. Results: Decreasing time to infusion from 113 to 16 days yielded the greatest change in preference weight (1.91). Physicians were willing to accept a >20% increase in risk of severe cytokine release syndrome and 15% increase in risk of severe neurological events in exchange for an increase in the probability of overall survival at 24 months from 40 to 55%. Conclusion: Physicians value reducing time to infusion and will accept incremental increases in serious adverse event risks to gain survival improvements.

Background: Pivotal trials of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) have identified common toxicities but may have been underpowered to detect cardiovascular and pulmonary adverse events (CPAEs)., Objectives: This study sought to investigate CPAEs associated with commercial CD19-directed CAR-T therapy., Methods: In this retrospective, pharmacovigilance study, the authors used the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system to identify CPAEs associated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. The authors evaluated disproportionate reporting by the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the lower bound of the information component 95% credibility interval (IC 025 >0 is deemed significant). Significant associations were further adjusted to age and sex (adj.ROR)., Results: The authors identified CAR-T reports of 2,657 patients, including 546 CPAEs (20.5%). CPAEs overlapped with cytokine release syndrome in 68.3% (373 of 546) of the reports. Compared with the full database, CAR-T was associated with overreporting of tachyarrhythmias (n = 74 [2.8%], adj.ROR = 2.78 [95% CI: 2.21-3.51]), cardiomyopathy (n = 69 [2.6%], adj.ROR = 3.51 [2.42-5.09]), pleural disorders (n = 46 [1.7%], adj.ROR = 3.91 [2.92-5.23]), and pericardial diseases (n = 11 [0.4%], adj.ROR = 2.26 [1.25-4.09], all IC 025 >0). Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) were associated only with axicabtagene-ciloleucel therapy (n = 28 [1.6%], adj.ROR = 1.80 [1.24-2.62], IC 025 >0). Atrial fibrillation (n = 55) was the leading tachyarrhythmia, followed by ventricular arrhythmias (n = 14). Tachyarrhythmias and VTEs were reported more often following axicabtagene-ciloleucel than tisagenlecleucel in an age- and sex-adjusted model (adj.ROR = 1.82 [1.04-3.18] and adj.ROR = 2.86 [1.18-6.93], respectively). Finally, the fatality rate of CPAEs was 30.9%., Conclusions: In this largest post-marketing study to date, the authors identified an association between CAR-T and various CPAEs, including tachyarrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, pericardial and pleural disorders, and VTEs. These findings should be considered in the multidisciplinary assessment for and monitoring of CAR-T therapy recipients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. This study was supported in part by NIH/NCI grant RO1-CA 233610 (Dr Herrmann). Dr Perales has received personal fees from Abbvie, Bellicum, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cidara Theraputics, Incyte, Kite/Gilead, Medigene, Miltenyi, MolMed, Nektar Therapeutics, NexImmune, Novartis, Omeros, Merck, Servier, and Tekeda; has served on data safety and monitoring boards for Cidara Therapeutics, Medigene, and Servier; and has received clinical trial support from Incyte, Kite/Gilead, and Miltenyi. Data presented in this study do not represent the opinion of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

CAR-T Cells are gene therapy medicinal products, a subcategory of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as defined in the EC Regulation 1394/2007. They may represent the first example of such medicinal products that are industry-manufactured and commercialized on a large scale. Their very nature, their manufacturing processes, pricing and conditions upon which they were approved by regulatory agencies, all lead the latter to require long-term follow-up after marketing approval with a view for a better definition of CAR-T Cells safety profile and efficacy profile in real world conditions. Collection and analysis of data over a 15-year period of time represents a technical and political challenge. So does the a priori definition of data to be collected for a wealth of forthcoming analyses that focus on the interests of a variety of stakeholders. EBMT has been collecting and analyzing data on hematopoietic cell transplants for decades. EBMT currently works with many interested parties to collect data on patients treated with CAR-T Cells., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

CAR-T Cells have opened new doors for cellular immunotherapies and provides new therapeutic options for patients with refractory B-cell malignancies, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and diffuse large B-cel lymphoma. CAR-T Cells have benefited from an accelerated approval procedure in many countries. Indeed, The French health authorities have approved the specialties Tisacel ® and Axicel ®, but additional data including the use of CAR-T Cells in real life were also mandatory. In regard to the scientific interest of the project, LYSA-LYSARC committed itself to prospectively and retrospectively collect information on patients eligible for CAR-T Cells as required by French health authorities. Other academic cooperating groups (GRAALL, IFM, SFCE, FILO and the scientific society SFGM-TC) were associated to this initiative which aims to build a nationwide CAR-T Cells devoted registry, so-called DESCART (Dispositif d'Enregistrement et Suivi des patients traités par CAR-T cells). DESCAR-T is a real-life multicentric registry set up in French sites qualified for CAR-T Cells treatment. DESCAR-T objective is to describe the use of CAR-T Cells in real life. All paediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancy fulfilling CAR-T Cells approval criteria and for whom a CAR-T Cells therapy has been discussed are included from 1 July 2018. Clinical data are directly collected from medical records and patients are treated according to the centers' routine practices. One of the distinctive features of DESCAR-T is its link with HTA for CAR-T Cells s reimbursement by the French public health system. DESCAR-T is the first national registry promoted by an academic group allowing centralized data collection for both academic and HTA/health authorities' purposes., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: Matthew Seftel reports receiving consulting fees from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Novartis and Kite/Gilead. Kevin Hay has served as an ad hoc consultant on advisory boards for Kite/Gilead, Celgene/BMS, and Novartis. No other competing interests were declared.

Regulatory T (Treg) cells are a heterogenous population of immunosuppressive T cells whose therapeutic potential for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and graft rejection is currently being explored. While clinical trial results thus far support the safety and efficacy of adoptive therapies using polyclonal Treg cells, some studies suggest that antigen-specific Treg cells are more potent in regulating and improving immune tolerance in a disease-specific manner. Hence, several approaches to generate and/or expand antigen-specific Treg cells in vitro or in vivo are currently under investigation. However, antigen-specific Treg cell therapies face additional challenges that require further consideration, including the identification of disease-relevant antigens as well as the in vivo stability and migratory behavior of Treg cells following transfer. In this review, we discuss these approaches and the potential limitations and describe prospective strategies to enhance the efficacy of antigen-specific Treg cell treatments in autoimmunity and transplantation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Selck and Dominguez-Villar.)

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) are approved for multiple indications in solid tumors. However access to these therapies is limited in low and middle income countries. Hence we performed an audit to identify accessibility, adverse event rates, compliance, progression free survival and overall survival in solid tumors., Methods: This was a single center retrospective analysis of prospective data base of patients with non-melanoma solid tumors who were treated with immunotherapy from August 2015 to November 2018. Adverse events during immunotherapy were documented and graded using CTCAE (Common terminology criteria for adverse events), v. 4.02. The response rates to immunotherapy, toxicities and the time to onset and resolution of toxicities were also evaluated as secondary endpoints., Results: Out of 9610 patients, only 155 patients (1.61%) could receive immunotherapy. The most common malignancies included metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma and relapsed/recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Median overall survival in patients who received immunotherapy in non-melanoma solid malignancies was 5.37 months (95% CI, 3.73-9.73). Poor performance status at baseline was the only adverse prognostic factor. The median progression free survival was 2.57 months (95% CI, 1.73-3.83). Immunotherapy was well tolerated with most common side effects being fatigue 14.8% and anorexia 5.8%. The cumulative incidence of immune related adverse events like hepatitis, pneumonitis, colitis and nephritis was less than 10%., Conclusion: Real-world data in Indian setting confirms the benefit of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-melanoma solid tumors., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is incurable in spite of recent treatment improvements, highlighting the development of new therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic effectiveness in high-risk B-cell malignancies. For relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), preclinical evaluations of CAR-T therapy have shown promising efficacy, thus various active clinical trials are under way. Herein, we conducted this review to summarize efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy and provide more evidence to guide clinical treatments. Method: We systematically searched literature based on databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and conference abstracts reported from American Society of Hematology (ASH), European Hematology Association (EHA) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in addition to other sources (www.clinicaltrials.gov, article citations). Data assessed efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in patients with RRMM were extracted and evaluated, and then systematically analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 (CMA 3.0). Results: A total of 23 studies including 350 participants from different countries, diagnosed as RRMM and treated with CAR-T therapy (containing 7 antigens targeted by CARs) were combined. In summary, we discovered the pooled overall response rate (77%), complete response rate (37%) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate within responders (78%). Furthermore, the pooled relapse rate of responders was 38% and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The pooled survival rate was 87% at last follow-up (median, 12 months). In addition, the pooled grade 3-4 rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities (NT) were 14% and 13%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that CAR-T therapy has demonstrated efficacy and safety in RRMM patients. BCMA-targeted CAR-T and anti-BCMA contained regimen have shown better efficacy., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (© The author(s).)

Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah™) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta™) are the first two approved drug products that belong to of a new class of therapies manufactured through an industrial process that includes the ex vivo genetic modification of human autologous T lymphocytes with viral vectors. Since CAR-T Cells qualify as gene therapy medicinal products, there is a requirement for long-term (15 years) follow-up of treated patients. As part of a global initiative aiming at a better use of continental registries to study the outcome of homogeneous groups of patients, EMA issued a positive opinion on the use of the EBMT registry to capture LTFU of patients treated with CAR-T Cell in EU Member states. The use of a European registry will provide a global view of this new field across EU countries and across diverse indications, and bears advantages over the use of registries dedicated to specific categories of diseases, or national registries. This is an important asset to fully measure the medical value of these innovative therapies in real-life conditions, and assess whether pricing is fully justified. To fulfill EMA requirements, as well as requirements from Pharma companies, EBMT has designed a new Cellular Therapy Med-A form that allows to capture the essential information on the administered drug product, disease and patient. Registering patients and capturing follow-up data is already possible in Promise, and will be made easier when the full migration of the EBMT database from Promise to MACRO is completed in the forthcoming weeks. Negotiations are ongoing with all interested parties including patients to define in which conditions data will be accessed and analyzed; the underlying principle is to favor rather than restrict the use of data, with a view to build cooperative projects involving relevant cooperative groups and professional associations. Here, we present practical recommendations issued by SFGM-TC to help data managers capture information related to patients treated with CAR-T Cells., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are harnessed to identify and lyse malignant cells specifically, efficiently, and independently of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). As a result, prognoses of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B cell hematological malignancies as well as limited types of solid tumors, have been ameliorated to a great extent. In China, a rising number of clinical trials that contribute to the development of novel CAR-T therapeutic strategies have been conducted on an extensive scale., Areas Covered: We summarize registered clinical trials related to CAR-T therapy conducted in China by evaluating various parameters such as distribution, study phase, CAR structure, target antigen, and disease. The efficacy, toxicity, and, more importantly, the new strategies for optimization of CAR-T therapy of Chinese studies and clinical trials are elaborated in detail., Expert Opinion: In terms of the number of CAR-T clinical trials, China is second to the USA, registering approximately 33% of trials worldwide. China's extensive explorations and breakthroughs in the search of novel target antigens, optimization of CAR structure, cocktail CAR-T therapy, combination therapy, and extension of CAR-T cell applications, imply that we are currently on the verge of a revolution in CAR-T therapy.

New York is at the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital (CUIMC/NYPH) had to make changes to its cellular therapy operations to ensure patient, donor, and staff safety and well-being. In this article, we discuss the process changes we instituted for cellular therapy clinical care, collection, processing, and cryopreservation to cope with the rapidly evolving pandemic., (© 2020 AABB.)

Purpose of Review: With the approval of the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell products on the market, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) required market authorization holders (MAHs) to monitor the long-term efficacy and safety of CAR-T cells for 15 years after administration. In 2019, the cellular therapy module of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry received a positive qualification opinion from the EMA indicating that the registry fulfills the essential needs to capture such data. We investigated its broader implication., Recent Findings: Since 2020, the cellular therapy module of the EBMT registry captures data to support postauthorization studies for MAHs and EMA. The process toward a positive qualification opinion has attracted interest from many other stakeholders, such as scientists and Health Technology Assessment bodies, and was the spin-off for a stimulating development which defined the need for a registry to comply with regulatory requirements, and also inspired ways to deal with CAR-T cell programs in terms of center qualifications and educational standards for professionals., Summary: The positive qualified opinion of the EBMT registry by EMA to monitor long-term efficacy and safety of commercial CAR-T cells created opportunities and challenges and was serving as linking-pin to launch a novel CAR-T cell community.

Introduction: In several studies, the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy tisagenlecleucel demonstrated encouraging rates of remission and lasting survival benefits in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel (list price: 320 000 EUR) among these patients when compared to clofarabine monotherapy (Clo-M), clofarabine combination therapy (Clo-C), and blinatumomab (Blina) from both a healthcare and a societal perspective. We also assessed future medical and future non-medical consumption costs., Methods: A three-state partitioned survival model was used to simulate a cohort of pediatric patients (12 years of age) through different disease states until the end of life (lifetime horizon). Relevant outcomes were life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), healthcare costs, societal costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainty was explored through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses as well as through several scenario analyzes., Results: Total discounted costs for tisagenlecleucel were 552 679 EUR from a societal perspective, which was much higher than the total discounted costs from a healthcare perspective (ie, 409 563 EUR). Total discounted societal costs for the comparator regimens ranged between 160 803 EUR for Clo-M and 267 259 EUR for Blina. Highest QALYs were estimated for tisagenlecleucel (11.26), followed by Blina (2.25), Clo-C (1.70) and Clo-M (0.74). Discounted societal ICERs of tisagenlecleucel ranged between 31 682 EUR/QALY for Blina and 37 531 EUR/QALY for Clo-C and were considered cost-effective with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 80 000 EUR/QALY. None of the scenarios exceeded this threshold, and more than 98% of the iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis were cost-effective., Discussion: At the current price and WTP threshold, tisagenlecleucel is cost-effective from both a healthcare and a societal perspective. Nevertheless, long-term effectiveness data are needed to validate the several assumptions that were necessary for this model., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies can be effective for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a cancer with limited treatment options and poor outcomes, particularly for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease. Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) are CAR T-cell therapies approved by regulatory bodies for certain patients with r/r DLBCL on the basis of demonstrated treatment effects in their pivotal single-arm trials, ZUMA-1 and JULIET, respectively. In the absence of head-to-head trials, the question of whether a valid indirect treatment comparison (ITC) between axi-cel and tisa-cel could be performed using existing evidence is of interest to patients, physicians, payers, and other stakeholders. This article addresses that question by summarizing the current evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies and discussing the challenges and limitations of potential analytical approaches associated with an ITC. Two ITC approaches attempting to adjust for cross-trial heterogeneity between ZUMA-1 and JULIET, matching-adjusted indirect comparison and regression-prediction model analysis, were evaluated. After evaluating the current clinical trial data and real-world evidence, and present and prior ITC analyses of axi-cel and tisa-cel, the authors conclude that a valid comparative analysis is not currently feasible. The substantial differences (e.g., timing of leukapheresis and enrollment, use of bridging chemotherapy [90% in JULIET vs. 0% in ZUMA-1], lymphodepleting regimens) between the two trials' designs and patient populations preclude a robust and reliable ITC. No other approaches are able to account for such differences. The current real-world data are still too immature to be used for ITCs. Thus, drawing conclusions from such ITCs should be avoided to prevent misinforming treatment choices or limiting patient access to effective treatment options. Additional data from ongoing or future real-world studies with appropriate statistical analyses are needed to provide insights into the comparative effectiveness and safety of these two treatments.

Purpose of the Study: Two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies - Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah ™ ) and Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta ™ ) - have been approved for commercial use. In order to inform forthcoming EBMT guidelines on the management of adults and children undergoing autologous CAR T-cell therapy, we undertook a survey of experienced clinicians., Methods: An online survey with a dual focus on (1) 'real world' patient eligibility criteria and (2) models of care for patient follow-up was sent to experienced physicians., Results: There were 41 respondents (10 countries) and 93% worked in FACT-JACIE-accredited transplant centres. Most felt that a history of malignancy (57%), prior allo-HCT for B-NHL (78%-81%) and prior treatment with anti-CD19/CD3 BiTE antibodies (76%-86%) do not constitute contra-indications to CAR T therapy. Clinicians were divided as to whether CNS involvement represented an exclusion criterion. There was agreement that patients with viral infections (HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C) are not eligible. There is no common model of care for long-term follow-up. Most respondents believed that patients should attend the hospital two (43%) to three (33%) times weekly during the first month following discharge. A majority (69%) of respondents work in centres where there is an MDT meeting with a specific focus on follow-up following CAR T Therapy. Follow-up care is currently delivered either in HCT or haematology-oncology outpatient clinics., Conclusion: The responses reveal wide variation in perceived patient eligibility criteria and highlight the need for consensus guidelines. The findings also illustrate the embryonic nature of current follow-up arrangements., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

We develop a mathematical model of pancreatic cancer that includes pancreatic cancer cells, pancreatic stellate cells, effector cells and tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing cytokines to investigate the effects of immunotherapies on patient survival. The model is first validated using the survival data of two clinical trials. Local sensitivity analysis of the parameters indicates there exists a critical activation rate of pro-tumor cytokines beyond which the cancer can be eradicated if four adoptive transfers of immune cells are applied. Optimal control theory is explored as a potential tool for searching the best adoptive cellular immunotherapies. Combined immunotherapies between adoptive ex vivo expanded immune cells and TGF-[Formula: see text] inhibition by siRNA treatments are investigated. This study concludes that mono-immunotherapy is unlikely to control the pancreatic cancer and combined immunotherapies between anti-TGF-[Formula: see text] and adoptive transfers of immune cells can prolong patient survival. We show through numerical explorations that how these two types of immunotherapies are scheduled is important to survival. Applying TGF-[Formula: see text] inhibition first followed by adoptive immune cell transfers can yield better survival outcomes.

The clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapy are growing fast in recent years, and most of the trials are initiated by sponsors from the United States and China. Exhibiting the distinctions between the clinical trials in the two countries is of great value for understanding the panorama of CAR T-cell clinical trials and forecasting the future of this promising therapy. We analyzed the critical elements of 289 clinical trials posted on the clinicaltrials.gov website by sponsors from the two countries and evaluated the efficacy data in available 50 published CAR T-cell studies. Our analysis shows that China has become the country with the largest number of CAR-T cell clinical trials by the end of 2017, while overall subject sample size and study center numbers are still larger, and the design of the clinical trials is more cautious in the United States. There are obvious differences between the two countries in CAR-targeted antigens in solid tumors and genetic modifications besides CARs for enhancing the potency of CAR T-cells. Although the currently available response rates are promising in both countries, it is inexpedient to conclude that the clinical efficacy is comparable between the two countries considering the smaller patient sample sizes and discrete distribution of median cell doses in China. And finally, the flexible regulatory regime of cell therapy in China, which expedites the bursting of CAR T-cell therapy, is also firstly introduced in our study., (© 2018 UICC.)

Patients treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have shown either sustained remission or rapid progression. Traditional survival modeling may underestimate outcomes in these situations, by assuming the same mortality rate for all patients. To illustrate this issue, we compare standard parametric models to mixture cure models for estimating long-term overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). Compared to standard models without cure proportions, mixture cure models have similar fit, but substantially different extrapolated survival. Standard models (Weibull and generalized gamma) estimate mean survival of 2.0 years (95% CI (1.5, 3.0)) and 3.0 years (95% CI (1.7, 5.6)), respectively, compared to 15.7 years (95% CI (9.3, 21.1)) and 17.5 yrs (12.0, 22.8) from mixture cure models (using Weibull and generalized gamme distributions). For cancer therapies where substantial fractions achieve long term remission, our results suggest that assumptions of the modeling approach should be considered. Given sufficient follow-up, mixture cure models may provide a more accurate estimate of long-term overall survival compared with standard models.

Regulatory Framework for Car-T Cells: HOW CAN FRENCH HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS ADAPT THEIR ORGANIZATION TO REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUFACTURING AND DELIVERY OF THESE INNOVATIVE CELL-BASED MEDICINAL PRODUCTS?: More than five years after the first US publications reporting a significant rate of clinical responses in patients with high-risk or advanced CD19+ lymphoid malignancies, access to treatment with CAR-T Cells at European hospitals in general and at French hospitals in particular remains limited. One - and not the least - hurdle lay in the need to set up a complex and unprecedented organization that complies with European regulations on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as well as with national (French) regulations. We here review the organizational framework for two situations: delivery and administration of industry-manufactured CAR-T Cells as well as engineering and distribution of CAR-T Cells produced as investigational drugs to be evaluated in the context of clinical research protocols. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Les cellules CAR-T : une révolution thérapeutique ? réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel des partenaires Gilead : Kite et Celgene., (© 2018 Société Française du Cancer. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.)

Background Aims: Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy has recently been reported frequently in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of DC-based immunotherapy on HCC by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis., Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science were searched to identify clinical trials on DC-based immunotherapy for HCC published up to January 31, 2018. The articles were selected according to pre-established inclusion criteria and methodologic quality, and publication bias were evaluated., Results: A total of 1276 cases from 19 clinical trials were included. Compared with traditional treatment, further DC-based therapy enhanced the CD4 + T/CD8 + T ratio (standardized mean difference: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.89, P < 0.001); increased the 1-year, 18-month and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the 1-year, 18-month and 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (relative risk > 1, P < 0.05), prolonged the median PFS time (median survival ratio [MSR]: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.60-2.46, P < 0.001) and median OS time (MSR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.51-1.96, P < 0.001). Adverse reactions were mild., Conclusions: DC-based therapy not only enhanced anti-tumor immunity, improved the survival rate and prolonged the survival time of HCC patients, but it was also safe. These findings will provide encouraging information for further development of DC-based immunotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for HCC. However, the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small study numbers, publication bias and the various of study designs, pre-treatment and therapeutic processes of DCs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Modified T cells that have been engineered to recognize the CD19 surface marker have recently been shown to be very successful at treating acute lymphocytic leukemias. Here, we explore four previous approaches that have used ordinary differential equations to model this type of therapy, compare their properties, and modify the models to address their deficiencies. Although the four models treat the workings of the immune system in slightly different ways, they all predict that adoptive immunotherapy can be successful to move a patient from the large tumor fixed point to an equilibrium with little or no tumor.

Cancer immunotherapy has long offered the promise of producing cancer treatments that are more effective and less toxic than traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. That potential has only begun to be realized in the last 5 years with the first US FDA-approved cancer vaccine (sipuleucel-T), checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cell therapy. While these therapies have been remarkably more effective than previous cancer immunotherapeutics, they are often limited by their inherently personalized nature. Indeed, each patient's immune system and cancer are unique, limiting the scalability and generalizability of new approaches. However, emerging solutions may overcome these limitations, producing 'off-the-shelf' cancer immunotherapies that transform patient outcomes.

Purpose: To clarify the long-term effect of immunotherapy, the effect of adoptive activated T lymphocyte immunotherapy on advanced lung cancer was evaluated in terms of survival time. In addition, the performance status of cancer patients under immunotherapy was examined., Experimental Design: Over 5 × 10(9) alpha-beta T lymphocytes cultured ex vivo with an immobilized anti-CD3 antibody and interleukin-2 were injected intravenously into patients, once every 2 weeks for 3 months or longer. Follow-up of these patients was carried out using clinical records and by telephone interview questionnaire. Patients undergoing immunotherapy in immunotherapy clinics and those undergoing other anticancer therapies without immunotherapy in seven hospitals in Tokyo were enrolled in this study. Data were analyzed by a third-party statistician. Performance status was studied on another series of various cancer patients who underwent immunotherapy., Results: The overall median survival time of the patients with the best supportive care, which was obtained using Kaplan-Meier's model, was 5.6 months, and those with immunotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, and immuno-chemotherapy were 12.5, 15.7, and 20.8 months, respectively. Using Cox' proportional hazard model, we examined the possible factors on survival time by univariate analysis. Then, the patients were stratified by gender and histological type for multivariate analysis. Significantly low hazard ratios were observed for immunotherapy and radiotherapy in males with squamous cancer; for chemotherapy and radiotherapy in male with adenocarcinoma; and for immunotherapy in females with adenocarcinoma. Addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant decrease in hazard ratio in females with adenocarcinoma. Studies on the performance status (PS), determined according to the European Cooperative Oncology Group criteria, revealed a continuous high level of PS under immunotherapy until around 2 months before death, in contrast to the gradual increase of tumor marker level., Conclusions: The effectiveness of immunotherapy on advanced lung cancer is limited but may extend life span under certain conditions. Immunotherapy itself provided no clinical benefit by itself as compared with chemotherapy, but a significant additive effect of immunotherapy on chemotherapy was observed in females with adenocarcinoma. Moreover, immunotherapy can maintain good quality of life of the patients until near the time of death.

We consider the design of dose-finding trials for patients with malignancies when only a limited sample size is available. The small sample size may be necessary because (1) the modality of treatment is very expensive, and/or (2) the disease under investigation is rare, requiring a lengthy period to enroll a target patient population. Both of these are common in the field of adoptive immunotherapy, in which T cells are infused to prevent and treat infections and malignancies. The clinical trial described in this paper investigates a novel therapy to adoptively transfer genetically modified T cells in small pilot protocols enrolling patients with B-lineage malignancies. Due to the constraints of cost and infrastructure, the maximum sample size for this trial is fixed at 12 patients distributed among four doses of T cells. Given these limitations, an innovative statistical design has been developed to efficiently evaluate the safety, feasibility, persistence, and toxicity profiles of the trial doses. The proposed statistical design is specifically tailored for trials with small sample sizes in that it uses the toxicity outcomes from patients treated at different doses to make dose-finding decisions. Supplementary materials including an R function and a movie demo can be downloaded in the websites mentioned in the paper.

In HLA-nonidentical bone marrow transplantation, we studied the characteristics of donor NK cells, recipient leukemia cells, and the cytokine environment that predict the antileukemia effects of allogeneic NK cells. We found that the risk of relapse in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies was best predicted by a model taking into consideration the presence of inhibitory killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIRs) on the donor's NK cells and the absence of corresponding KIR ligand in the recipient's HLA repertoire (a receptor-ligand model). The risk of relapse was prognosticated less precisely by the Perugia donor-recipient KIR ligand-ligand mismatch model or by a natural cytotoxicity model. In contrast to the ligand-ligand model, we found that the new receptor-ligand model was accurate when analysis was applied to patients with lymphoid malignancy. These findings corroborate our observations that the recipient's KIR repertoire, which was derived from highly purified, HLA-disparate CD34+ cells, resumed a donor-specific pattern within 3 mo of transplantation, but did not correlate evidently with the donor or recipient ligand repertoire. In an in vitro assay and an in vivo mouse model, human NK cell cytotoxicity toward human leukemia cells with 11q23 chromosomal rearrangement increased with the number of receptor-ligand mismatch pairs or prestimulation with IL-12 and IL-18. These findings provide new insights into the determinants of antileukemia effects of allogeneic NK cells and therapeutic strategies.

Patients are eligible for accrual onto a phase I autologous tumour vaccine clinical trial if their resected and dissociated tumour achieves a minimum viable cell count. Because tumour pre-processing and cell count determination are expensive, there has been developed a screening procedure based on tumour mass to screen out those tumours unlikely to yield sufficient viable cells. If theta is the ratio of the expected benefit of an accrual onto the study to the cost of tumour pre-processing and cell counting, then we maximize long-run benefit by pre-processing and counting only those tumours whose masses exceed a cutoff mc, such that Pr(sufficient tumour cells masses = mc) = 1/theta. We derive algorithms for estimating mc and evaluate them under a variety of assumptions concerning the cell count/mass relationship. These include explicit equations for mc under parametric assumptions as well as more general algorithms based on non-parametric smoothing techniques. We show that when theta deviates substantially from 2, these methods outperform simple inverse interpolation.