Search

Hypertension is a commonly reported comorbidity in patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and its management represents a challenge in patients treated with 2nd- or 3rd-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), considering their additional cardiovascular (CV) toxicity. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) contributes to hypertension genesis and plays an important role in atherosclerosis development, proliferation, and differentiation of myeloid hematopoietic cells. We analyzed a cohort of 192 patients with hypertension at CML diagnosis, who were treated with 2nd- or 3rd-generation TKIs, and evaluated the efficacy of RAS inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs)) in the prevention of arterial occlusive events (AOEs), as compared with other drug classes. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AOEs was 32.7 ± 4.2%. Patients with SCORE ≥ 5% (high-very-high) showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (33.7 ± 7.6% vs 13.6 ± 4.8%, p = 0.006). The AOE incidence was significantly lower in patients treated with RAS inhibitors (14.8 ± 4.2% vs 44 ± 1%, p < 0.001, HR = 0.283). The difference in the low and intermediate Sokal risk group was confirmed but not in the high-risk group, where a lower RAS expression has been reported. Our data suggest that RAS inhibitors may represent an optimal treatment in patients with hypertension and CML, treated with 2nd or 3rdG TKIs.

No abstract available.

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have an increased vulnerability to SARS-Cov-2 (Sharma et al, Lancet Haematology 2020; Ljungman et al, Leukemia 2021), the reason why international guidelines strongly support the need for a protective vaccination for these subjects. The most relevant data currently available on the response to a complete anti-SARS-Cov-2 vaccination cycle in HM patients after HSCT refer to 314 patients reported in a Lithuanian national survey (Maneikis et al, Lancet Haematol 2021). In this study, the median titers of antibodies against SARS-Cov-2, determined 7-21 days after the second vaccination, were comparable to that of healthy controls (HC) in both autologous and allogeneic groups, with no patient found below the protective threshold of 50 arbitrary units (AU)/ml. Notably, the large majority of patients had received the transplant more than 1 year before vaccination. In a prospective, cohort study, we compared 114 patients, who had received an autologous or allogeneic HSCT at least three months before the first dose of vaccination, to 107 HC, matched for age and sex. Study population and HC received two doses of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-Cov-2 mRNA vaccine on days 1 and 21, between April and May 2021. Serological tests were performed by a commercially available immunoassay for the quantitative determination of anti-spike IgG antibodies to SARS-Cov-2. The cut-off for defining responders was 50 or greater AU/ml. Patients and HC samples were collected four weeks after the second dose of the vaccine. Table 1 reports the main clinical characteristics of patients and HC. Eighteen of 114 patients (16%) did not respond (24% in the allogeneic group, 6% in autologous recipients). Overall, median antibodies titers did not differ between HC and the entire cohort of transplanted patients, recipients of allogeneic HSCT, all patients responding to the vaccine or responders in the autologous subgroup (Figure 1A). All autologous HSCT recipients had significantly lower titers of antibodies than HC, while higher levels were found in responders who had received allogeneic HSCT (Figure 1A). Responders in the allogeneic subgroup showed antibodies titers significantly higher than responders in the autologous subgroup (Figure 1B). We further stratified patients in three groups, according to the time elapsed from transplant to vaccination: G1:5 years. Higher antibodies titers were observed in HC compared to all transplanted patients in G1 (Figure 1C), including both allogeneic (Figure 1D) and autologous (Figure 1E) HSCT recipients. No differences emerged in G2 between HC and all patients (Figure 1C), allogeneic (Figure 1D) or autologous (Figure 1E) HSCT recipients. Finally, no differences were found in G3 when comparing HC with all patients (Figure 1C) or allogeneic recipients (Figure 1D), whereas patients in the autologous subgroup showed significantly lower titers than HC (Figure 1E). Myeloma patients with controlled disease showed higher titers than patients with active disease (Figure 1F). According to median age, autologous HSCT recipients older than 57 years had significantly lower antibody levels than younger patients (Figure 1G). Autologous vs allogeneic HSCT, age of all patients and of allogeneic HSCT recipients, sex, type of allogeneic HSCT, conditioning regimen, age and sex of donor, occurrence of GVHD, disease type and single vs double autologous HSCT did not significantly impact on antibody levels (data not shown). No relevant side effects were recorded after vaccination. With a median follow up of 12 weeks, no case of COVID19 occurred among vaccinated patients. In our single center study, patients with a previous history of HSCT tolerated well BNT162b2 vaccine and mounted a potentially protective immune response in the majority of cases one month after two doses of vaccine. However, lack of response was not rare, especially in the allogeneic setting. The main factor associated with the quality of response was the time from HSCT, with lower responses within the first year from transplant and differences between autologous and allogeneic groups transplanted more than five years before vaccination. Here, a consolidated, complete immune reconstitution in allogeneic HSCT recipients, as well as age and a still active disease in the autologous setting, could have played opposite pivotal roles. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Delia: Gilead: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Introduction Treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) proved to be almost equally effective in young and elderly patients. Three TKIs, imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS) and nilotinib (NIL), are approved for frontline therapy in Italy. Choice of frontline TKI is based on a combined evaluation of patient's characteristics and expectations, with age usually playing a prominent role. However, to date, few data are available on patterns of TKI selection in very elderly patients. Aim To analyse the use of frontline TKI therapy in a large and unselected cohort of very elderly CP-CML patients Methods We retrospectively evaluated 332 patients aged ≥75 year diagnosed from 1/2012 to 12/2019 at 36 Hematology Centres participating at the "Campus CML" project. Results Clinical features at diagnosis for the whole cohort and according to frontline TKI are reported in Table 1. As to frontline TKI, 285 patients (85.8%) received IM and 47 (14.2%) a 2G-TKI (DAS n=28, 59.5%; NIL n=19, 40.5%). Of the 285 IM-treated patients, 192 (67.3%) started with standard dose (400 mg/day) and 93 (32.7%) with a reduced dose (300 mg/day n=64, 22.5%; Following widespread introduction of generic IM in Italy in early 2018, patients were divided in 2 groups: among 238 patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2017, 198 (83.1%) received IM and 40 (16.9%) a 2G-TKI, while patients diagnosed in 2018-2019 were treated with IM in 87/94 (92.5%) cases and with a 2G-TKI in 7 (7.5%) cases only (p=0.028). Conclusions IM remains the frontline drug of choice in very elderly CML patients, and this trend seems to increase after the introduction of the generic formulation. However, 2G-TKI are used in a small but sizeable group of patients, without a clear correlation with baseline CML features, thus probably reflecting a physician's evaluation of patient's fitness and/or expectation. Efficacy and safety of initial reduced TKIs doses in the setting of very elderly patients warrant further analyses. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Latagliata: Novartis: Honoraria; BMS Cellgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Elena: CELGENE: Other: funding for meeting participation; PFIZER: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iurlo: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Sportoletti: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stagno: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; InCyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding. Abruzzese: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Breccia: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Background. Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for adults with resistant or intolerant chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or those carrying the T315I mutation. Ponatinib has been commercially available since January 2015, yet there is a paucity of data on its use in the real-world setting. The goal of the Observational study of Iclusig ® (ponatinib) Treatment in patients with CML in Italy (OITI) was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes, including safety and efficacy, in patients with CML treated in Italy since the approval of ponatinib. Methods. This noninterventional study included patients aged ≥18 years with CP, AP, or BP CML who initiated ponatinib treatment in routine clinical practice across 26 Italian centers (academic and hospital settings). The study population comprised a prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib after site activation during the 12-month enrollment period; a retrospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib but died or were lost to follow-up prior to site activation; and a retrospective/prospective cohort, including patients who started treatment with ponatinib prior to site activation and were still on treatment or in follow-up at the end of the study. Demographic, efficacy, and safety data were collected from patient medical charts at study entry and routine visits. The primary endpoint was the complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate in CP CML patients 6 months after starting ponatinib. In the absence of cytogenetic evaluation, molecular assessment was used, considering patients in MR2 or better to be in CCyR. Here, the primary analysis of all evaluable patients for the primary endpoint (median follow-up, 23.7 months [range, 1.3-70.8]) is presented. Results. A total of 119 patients (110 CP, 6 AP, and 3 BP CML) were analyzed. Fifty-nine (49.6%) received ponatinib in second-line (2L), 41 (34.4%) in 3L, and 19 (16.0%) in ≥4L. Prior cardiovascular disease/hypertension was recorded in 56 (47.1%) patients. Median age at ponatinib start was 60 years (range, 19-93). Of 68 evaluated patients, 24 (35.3%) had a confirmed ABL1 mutation, including 7 (10.3%) with the T315I mutation. Starting doses of ponatinib were 45 mg (37.0%), 30 mg (41.2%), or 15 mg (21.8%). Median treatment duration was 22.8 months (range, 1.4-73.6). At baseline, 56 patients with CP CML had less than CCyR and 53 were in CCyR. For 1 patient, assessment was not available. At 6 months, 80/107 evaluable patients with CP CML were in CCyR; 29/56 (51.8%) achieved and 50/50 (100%) maintained CCyR compared to baseline, respectively. For 1 patient, baseline data were unavailable. Additionally, 37 (34.6%) and 19 (17.8%) patients with CP CML achieved a major molecular response (MMR; MR3) and a deep molecular response (MR4-MR5), respectively (Table 1). Progression-free survival rates estimated for patients with CP CML at 12 and 24 months were 92.6% (95% CI, 87.8-97.7%) and 84.6% (95% CI, 77.2-92.6%), respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates were 95.4% (95% CI, 91.6-99.4%), and 88.4% (95% CI, 81.7-95.7%). Seventy-one (59.7%) patients had treatment-related adverse events (AEs), most commonly rash, hypertension (Grade 1-2), and thrombocytopenia (Grade 3). Treatment-related arterial occlusive events occurred in 2 (1.7%) patients. Dose modifications occurred in 77 patients: 37.1% were due to AEs, 13.5% were reductions after at least major cytogenetic response, 10.6% were increases due to lack of efficacy, 1.7% were medical decisions, and 37.1% were for other reasons. Thirty-three patients discontinued ponatinib due to AEs (33.3%), medical decisions (24.2%), and other reasons (42.4%), such as death, progression, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Conclusions. This observational study demonstrates that ponatinib has a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with CML treated in standard clinical practice. By 6 months, 74.8% of evaluable patients were in CCyR and 52.3% achieved at least MMR. Further, the probability of survival at 2 years was >88%. No new safety signals emerged with ponatinib treatment compared to prior studies. The early use of ponatinib and careful dose selection appear key to the safety and efficacy outcomes observed in this real-world study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Breccia: Abbvie: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abruzzese: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bonifacio: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Castagnetti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Galimberti: Inctye Bioscience Italy Srl: Current Employment. Iurlo: Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.

Introduction. New guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia and lipid modification in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events have been recently published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). New recommendations regarding the target value of plasma lipids in very high and high CV risk patients have been provided, in addition to an estimate of the CV risk with a new Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart. Few data have been reported on the management of dyslipidemia in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with nilotinib, and the association with arterial occlusive events (AOEs). We therefore analyzed a large real-life cohort of Italian patients with CML treated with nilotinib outside of clinical trials and evaluated the association between AOEs and plasma lipoproteins levels; moreover, we estimated the prognostic value of the new SCORE chart to predict AOEs. The secondary endpoint was to report the management of dyslipidemia in the clinical practice. Methods. We identified 233 adult patients with CML who were treated in 20 Italian centers with nilotinib. All patients were stratified into low to moderate (SCORE ≤ 5%) or high to very high (SCORE risk >5%) CV risk, according to the new version of the SCORE 2019. We recorded concentration levels of cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and triglycerides at diagnosis of CML, before starting ponatinib and therefore after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. All AOEs (cerebrovascular, peripheral vascular and CV events excluding hypertension) were considered. Results. The median age was 50 years (range 20-88) and the Sokal score was intermediate-high in 45.5% of patients. The median follow-up was 5 years (range 3.4-10.5). Nilotinib was administered as first line of therapy in (72%) of cases or second or subsequent lines of treatment for inefficacy (20.9%) or intolerance (7.1%). At baseline, nilotinib was administered at the following doses: 800 mg/day in 9.3% of patients, 600 mg/day in 87% of patients, 400 mg/day in 3.1% of patients and 300mg in 0.6% of patients, respectively. The median time of drug exposure was 60 months (range 2-155). The 48-month cumulative incidence rate of AOEs was 14.1±2.7%. Patients with cholesterol plasma levels > 200 mg/dL and LDL >70 mg/dL at baseline and 3 months after starting nilotinib, showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (24.5±7.3% vs 11±2.7%, P=0.02 and 22.3±4.9% vs 5.9±2.6, P=0.003, respectively) Figure 1. Patients with triglycerides levels > 200 mg/dL 3 months after starting nilotinib, showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (56±20.5% vs 13.3±2.7%, P=0.011) Patients belonging to the high and very high SCORE risk group showed a significant increase of AOEs (32.8.1±9% vs. 9±1%±2.6%, p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, statistical significance of cholesterol plasma levels > 200 mg/dL and LDL >70 mg/dL after 3 months and high-very-high SCORE was maintained (P=0.018, HR=3.4, 95% CI=1.2-9.4 and P=0.004, HR=3.5, 95% CI=1.5-8.2, respectively). Overall, 46 patients (20.5%) presented dyslipidemia at CML diagnosis and 65 (29%) at the start of treatment with nilotinib. Despite dyslipidemia, only 6 patients were taking statins during the treatment with nilotinib and only 5 started it after 3 months of nilotinib: 3 patients were treated with rosuvastatin and 2 with pravastatin. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that a proper control of dyslipidemia, keeping cholesterol and triglycerides plasma levels ≤ 200 mg/dL and LDL ≤70 mg/dL is associated with reduced risk of AOEs in CML patients treated with nilotinib. An under estimation of the clinical importance of elevated plasma lipids as a risk factor for AOEs events represents a possible issue in the real-life. Figure 1 Disclosures Abruzzese: Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bms: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Galimberti:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pregno:Incyte-Italy,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports; Novartis-Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports; Pfizer-Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference reports. Bocchia:CELGENE: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Gugliotta:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Limited information is available regarding the rate of long-term cardiovascular (CV) mortality in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients treated with second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2ndG/3rdG TKIs) in the real-life practice. Methods We identified 656 consecutive CML patients treated with nilotinib, dasatinib, bosutinib and ponatinib. Results The 15-year CV-mortality free survival was 93 ± 2.8%. Age ≥65 years (p = 0.005) and a positive history of CV disease (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with a lower CV-mortality free survival. CV disease accounted for 16.5% and 5% of potential years of life lost (PYLL) in male and female patients, respectively. The standard mortality ratio (SMR) following ischemic heart disease (IHD) was 3.9 in males and 3.8 in female patients, meaning an excess of IHD deaths observed, in comparison with the population of control. Conclusion. Prevention strategies based on CV risk factors, in particular in those patients with a previous history of CV disease, should be considered.

Introduction: Bosutinib is a Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) currently licensed for patients with Ph+ chronic-phase (CP), accelerated-phase (AP), or blast-phase (BP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia after failure or intolerance to at least 2 other TKIs. It can also be prescribed, in accordance with label if, after failure of the first TKI therapy, another option does not seem feasible. Previous studies demonstrated a potent activity of second-line bosutinib across a spectrum of BCR-ABL1 mutations and a distinct toxicity profile compared to other TKIs. Aim: We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of real life Bosutinib administration in 85 patients resistant/refractory or intolerant to other TKIs, referred to 22 Italian Hematological Institutions. The main features at Bosutinib start are reported in the Table. Results: At Bosutinib start, all patients were in CP. 60 patients (71%) were resistant/refractory, 25 (29%) were intolerant to previous TKIs. BCR-ABL1 kinase mutations were reported in 5/35 evaluable patients (14%); no T315I was reported. The number of previous TKIs was less than 3 in 24/85 patients (28%) and 3 or more in 61 (72%). Comorbidities were present in 63 patients (74%), the most common being arterial hypertension (40), diabetes (14), cardiac disease (10) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6). The most frequent concomitant medications were: antihypertensive in 55% patients, antiplatelets in 26%, antidiabetic in 19%. The initial dose was 100 mg in 4/85 patients (5%), 200 mg in 24 (28%), 300 mg in 18 (22%), 400 in 8 (9%); 31 patients (36%) started at the full standard dose of 500 mg. Major Molecular Response (MMR)/Deep Molecular Response (DMR) were achieved by 37/80 (46%) evaluable patients; 43/80 patients (54%) never reached a MMR/DMR at any time. Best responses in these cases were: Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) in 4 patients (9%), Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR) in 6 (14%), Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in 10 (23%). Dose reductions were necessary in 4 patients (5%) due to adverse events (2 cases of diarrhea, 1 transaminase elevation, 1 skin rash). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range 3-49), 75/85 patients (88%) are alive and 54/75 patients (72%) are still in treatment. Discontinuations were due to: intolerance in 8/75 patients (11%), loss of response in 3/75 (4%), resistance to therapy in 10/75 (13%). Hematological toxicity was observed in 14 patients (16%), any grade, and grade 3-4 in 3 (3%). Extra-hematological toxicity was reported in 41/85 patients (48%), any grade, and grade 3-4 in 14 patients (16%). Causes of death were: acute myocardial infarction (3), cardiac failure (2), acute respiratory distress (2), allogeneic transplant complications (1), cerebral hemorrhage (2). Conclusions: In our "real life experience" with Bosutinib, we confirm a stable long-term efficacy in heavily pre-treated, mainly elderly patients with intolerance/resistance to other TKIs, who show an initial response to treatment, as reported in clinical trials. Patients show a fast response to the drug (mainly at three months). Hematological and extrahematological toxicities are manageable. Disclosures Breccia: BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Castagnetti:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bonifacio:Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

Background Bosutinib is a 2nd generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) active in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients resistant or intolerant to frontline imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib; the favourable toxicity profile makes bosutinib potentially useful in elderly patients, but at present there are no data in unselected cohorts of these subjects. Aim To highlight this issue, a real-life cohort of 91 patients followed in 21 Italian Centers and treated with bosutinib when aged > 65 years was retrospectively evaluated. Patients The main clinical features of the whole cohort at diagnosis and at baseline of bosutinib treatment are reported in the Table; all patients were in CP when bosutinib was started. Median interval from diagnosis to bosutinib treatment was 49.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 14.2 - 117.5]. Results Starting dose of bosutinib was 500 mg/day in 20 patients (22.0%), 400 mg/day in 7 patients (7.7%), 300 mg/day in 28 patients (30.8%), 200 mg/day in 34 patients (37.3%) and 100 mg/day in 2 patients (2.2%), respectively. After a median period of treatment of 18.1 months (IQR 9.4 - 27.7) all patients were evaluable for toxicity; on the whole, all grade hematological and extra-hematological toxicities were reported in 12/91 (13.1%) and 45/91 (49.4%) patients, respectively. A grade 3 - 4 hematological toxicity occurred in 5/91 patients (5.4%); a grade 3 - 4 extra-hematological toxicity occurred in 16/91 patients (17.5%). Overall, 46 patients (50.5%) never discontinued bosutinib: a temporary discontinuation < 6 weeks was needed in 19 patients (20.9%) and a temporary discontinuation > 6 weeks in 2 patients (2.2%). A permanent bosutinib discontinuation was needed in the remaining 24 patients (26.4%): in particular, 11 patients (12.1%) permanently discontinued bosutinib due to toxicity (skin rash in 3 cases, gastro-intestinal toxicity in 3 cases, pleural effusion in 2 cases, transaminitis, QTc prolongation and myalgia in 1 case each), 6 patients (6.6%) due to resistance and 7 patients (7.7%) due to other reasons (unrelated death in 6 cases and patient decision in 1 case). As to response, 5 patients (5.5%) were considered too early for assessment (< 3 months of treatment); among the 86 patients evaluable for response, 11 patients (12.7%) did not have any response (including 6 patients who discontinued bosutinib for early toxicity), 4 (4.6%) achieved hematological response only, and 71 (82.5%) achieved Cytogenetic Response (CyR) (Major CyR in 4, Complete CyR in 67). Among the 67 patients in Complete CyR, 58 (67.4% of all 86 evaluable patients) also achieved Molecular Response (MR) [Major MR (MR 3.0) in 19 (22.1%), Deep MR (MR 4.0/4.5) in 39 (45.3%)]. The 3-year Overall Survival and Event-Free Survival of the whole cohort of patients from bosutinib start were 83.0% (CI95% 71.6 - 94.4) (Figure 1) and 59.5% (CI95% 39.9 - 72.1), respectively. Conclusions Our real-life data show that bosutinib is effective, even if initial doses in many cases were lower than recommended, with a favourable safety profile also in elderly patients with important comorbidities resistant/intolerant to previous TKI treatments,: as a consequence, it could play a significant role in the current clinical practise for these frail patients. Disclosures Latagliata: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Trawinska:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Annunziata:Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Elena:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Crugnola:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bonifacio:Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Sgherza:Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Iurlo:Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Breccia:Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal B-cell cancer of proliferating plasma cells. It represents nearly a tenth of all hematologic malignancies. Renal dysfunction is present in 25–50 % of newly diagnosed MM patients, about 9 % of which needs hemodialysis (HD). Cast nephropathy is determined by an overflow of filtered serum-free light chains (sFLC) in the proximal tubule that largely overwhelms its endocytic capacity. Bortezomib-based regimens, including high-dose dexamethasone, are recommended as first-choice therapy. In addition, kidney exposure to sFLC may be reduced with extracorporeal sFLC removal. Plasma exchange has been for long time the only extracorporeal technique used in cast nephropathy, but it is now not recommended for sFLC removal in patients with MM-associated AKI. In recent years, other techniques such as HD with new generation high cutoff dialyzers showed their efficacy in sFLC removal and should now be considered for a more rapid reduction of sFLC levels in combination with bortezomib-based therapies.

Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT). In many inflammatory fibrotic diseases, such as Systemic Scleroderma (SSc) and cGVHD with fibrotic features, an abnormal activation of transforming growth factor (TGFβ) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) pathways have been observed. Tyrosin Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), which are currently used for treatment of patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), share potent antifibrotic and antiinflammatory properties, being powerful dual inhibitors of both PDGF-R and TGFβpathways. Moreover accumulating in vitro data confirm that TKIs, interacting with the TCR and other signalling molecules, carry potent immunomodulatory effects, being involved in both T-cell and B-cell response. Translation to the clinical setting revealed that treatment with Imatinib can achieve encouraging responses in patients with autoimmune diseases and steroid-refractory cGVHD, showing a favourable toxicity profile. While the exact mechanisms leading to such efficacy are still under investigation, use of TKIs in the context of clinical trials should be promoted, aiming to evaluate the biological changes induced in vivo by TKIs and to assess the long term outcome of these patients. Second-generation TKIs, with more favourable toxicity profile are under evaluation in the same setting.

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation screening has been shown to enable greater accuracy and sensitivity and straightforward identification of compound mutants (CM) as compared to Sanger sequencing (seq). However, the prevalence of CMs has never been assessed in prospective studies, and although in vitro data suggest that many of them may be challenging for all tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) including ponatinib, attempts to correlate such data with in vivo responses have never been made. To address these issues, we have reviewed the results of routine NGS-based BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening performed over the past 3 years. Between 2015 and 2018, we have prospectively used NGS to analyze a consecutive series of 751 Ph+ leukemia patients (pts) on TKI therapy who were eligible for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening according to ELN/NCCN/ESMO recommendations. The study population included 664 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) pts with failure or warning response (chronic phase [CP], n=593; accelerated or blastic phase [AP/BP], n=71) and 87 Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) pts with relapsed/refractory disease. NGS of ≈400bp amplicons generated by nested RT-PCR was performed on a Roche GS Junior (until April 2017) or on an Illumina MiSeq (from May 2017 on) using custom protocols whose accuracy, sensitivity and reproducibility was checked by national and international (EUTOS) control rounds. Read alignment and variant calling was done using the AmpSuite software (SmartSeq srl), with a lower detection limit set to 3%. Cis or trans configuration of mutation pairs, indicating CMs or polyclonality, respectively, was determined correcting for the likelihood of PCR recombination. The 35INS insertion/truncation mutant was excluded from the analysis. NGS identified mutations in the BCR-ABL1 KD in a total of 313/664 (47%) CML pts (255/593 [43%] CP-CML and 58/71 [82%] AP/BP-CML) and 69/87 (79%) Ph+ ALL pts. Ninety-one percent of the mutations could be recognized as conferring resistance to at least one TKI on the basis of publicly available IC50 data or published reports. In 42/593 (7%) CP-CML, 6/71 (8.5%) AP/BP-CML and 12/87 (14%) Ph+ ALL pts, low burden mutations (i.e., mutations carried by a proportion of transcripts 15% - hence detectable by Sanger seq). Fifty-five (9.2%) CP-CML, 51 (72%) AP/BP-CML and 56 (49%) Ph+ ALL pts had ≥2 mutations (CP-CML: 1-5 mutations; AP/BP-CML: 1-6 mutations; Ph+ ALL: 1-13 mutations). Identification of CMs in pts with ≥2 mutations was fully possible (i.e., all the candidate pairs mapped within a distance of 400bp) in 71% of cases and partially possible (i.e., some, but not all the candidate pairs mapped within a distance of 400bp) in another 12% of cases. A total of 86 CMs (85 double and 1 triple) in 73 pts (21 [3.5%] CP-CML, 23 [32%] AP/BP-CML and 29 [37%] Ph+ ALL pts) could be catalogued (Figure 1A). All but two (T315I+D276G, M244V+E255K) were detected in pts who had received ≥2 TKIs and all included at least a 2nd-generation TKI-resistant mutation. The most frequent CMs were T315I+E255K, T315I+E255V, T315I+F359V, F317L+Y253H (Figure 1A). The triple CM, detected in a ponatinib-resistant pt, was F317I+Y253F+Q252H. Correlation of IC50 data with in vivo responses (the TKIs pts were clinically resistant to) confirmed only partially in vitro predictions (Figure 1B). In particular, although ponatinib was shown in vitro to be poorly effective against several CMs, only the T315I+E255V was consistently found to be associated with ponatinib failure. In conclusion, our results in a large unselected series of TKI-resistant pts analyzed by NGS show that:CMs are relatively infrequent in CP-CML, but may be a relevant issue in AP/BP-CML and Ph+ ALL;among pts with multiple mutations, those who have failed 1 line of therapy have most often polyclonality, whereas those who have failed ≥2 lines of therapy may have CMs or polyclonality;in vitro predictions of sensitivity and insensitivity based on IC50 data should be regarded with caution. In particular, the only compound mutant that we consistently found to be associated with ponatinib failure was the T315I+E255V. Supported by EUTOS 2016. Disclosures Soverini: Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Pagano:Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Basilea: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Gugliotta:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Castagnetti:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Angelucci:Roche Italy: Other: Local (national) advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Chair Steering Comiittee TELESTO Protocol; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Chair DMC; Jazz Pharmaceuticals Italy: Other: Local ( national) advisory board; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (MA) and CRISPR CAS9 Therapeutics AG (CH): Other: Chair DMC. Martinelli:Abbvie: Consultancy; Ariad/Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy. Cavo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background . Arterial occlusive events (AOEs) represent emerging complications in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib, with a cumulative incidence correlated with the higher dose of the drug and longer treatment duration. Current recommendations highlight the importance of a careful evaluation of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors at baseline.Moreover, a preventive strategy with primary prophylaxis based on aspirin still remains under discussion and no data have been reported on secondary prophylaxis. Methods. We investigated a consecutive series of adult CML patients (mean age 50 years, range 24-81) who initiated ponatinib, between January 2012 and December 2016 at 15 Italian centers. Patients were stratified according to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) assessment, based on gender, age, smoking habits, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol levels. Additional risk factors were considered the presence of diabetes, body mass index > 24.5 kg/m2, mild or severe renal insufficiency, and dyslipidemia. CML patients were also evaluated for both comorbidities and a positive anamnesis of CV diseases.Primary and secondary CV prophylaxis before starting ponatinib was also reported. We evaluated the cumulative incidence of AOEs (myocardial infarction, angina, ischemic cerebrovascular events and peripheral vascular disease) after initiating treatment with ponatinib, and their management. Results. A total of 71 patients were retrospectively identified. The reasons for treatment with ponatinib were inefficacy of previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in 80.2% and intolerance in 19.8%. The median time of exposure to ponatinib was 16 months (range 3-69).The 60-month cumulative incidence of AOEs was 30.9±11.5%.Patients aged ≥60 years showed a higher incidence of AOEs (61.8±19.5% vs 19.5±12.0%, p=0.001) (Figure 1). The majority of patients (95%) were classified as at low-intermediate SCORE risk and 5% as at high-very high SCORE risk. Patients with a high-very high SCORE showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (100% vs. 25.8±11.5%; p Conclusions. This study confirms the increased risk of AOEs in CML patients treated with ponatinib in the real-life, particularly in patients aged ≥60 years. Our findings emphasize the need of personalized prevention strategies based on CV risk factors, in close collaboration with cardio-oncologists, angiologists and vascular surgeons. We suggest that patients treated with ponatinib should undergo prophylaxis with aspirin 100 mg. Data on the efficacy of primary prophylaxis need to be confirmed in larger cohorts of patients and in prospective randomised trials. Figure 1.Arterial Occlusive Events (AOEs) cumulative incidence according to age ≥ 60 years in 71 CML patients treated with ponatinib Figure. Figure. Disclosures Abruzzese: BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Bonifacio:Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Foà:CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau. Breccia:Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

B-prolymphocytic leukaemia with t(11;14) revisited: a splenomegalic form of mantle cell lymphoma evolving with leukaemia We reviewed eight cases that were diagnosed before 1995 with B- prolymphocytic leukaemia (B-PLL) harbouring t(11;14)(q13;q32) and/or cyclin D1 staining. Thirteen B-PLL patients without t(11;14) were selected as controls. Peripheral blood, bone marrow and histological sections were re-examined without cytogenetic information. Final diagnosis was made using morphology, cytogenetics, immunophenotype and immunohistochemistry. Clinical characteristics were similar for both groups except for younger age, male predominance and extranodal involvement in cases with t(11;14). CD5 was more frequently positive in the t(11;14)+ group (80%) than in the t(11;14)- group (31%). Surface membrane immunoglobulin was strongly expressed by all t(11;14)+ cases, but only 45% of t(11;14)- cases. Histopathological and cytological review of cases with t(11;14) showed an infiltrate with a mixture of cells, some resembling prolymphocytes and others with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) morphology. Blood films of cases with t(11;14) showed features suggestive of B-PLL in three, and in others, a mixture of cells resembling MCL and nucleolated ones; none corresponded to the blastoid form of MCL. We suggest that 'B-PLL' with t(11;14) may represent a splenomegalic form of MCL evolving with leukaemia. These cases illustrate the importance of tissue diagnosis with cyclin D1 staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in B-cell leukaemia with prolymphocytic features.

AML patients early relapsing within 12 months, still represents an extremely poor prognosis setting. Cytogenetic and molecular data are not diagnostic in 20-25% of AML patients and intermediate 2 ELN risk category has still an undefined prognosis. Post induction and consolidation MRD might represent a new prognostic factor besides patients and disease characteristics. We have evaluated post induction and consolidation bone marrow mimimal residual disease (MRD) in 126 AML patients (median age: 61.5 years, range: 17-89) with 20 months median follow-up (range 2-79.9). We analysed abnormal leukemia immunophenotype (ALIP) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC) and WT1 by RT-PCR as described by Buccisano et al and Cilloni et al. Cytogenetic, NPM and FLT3 status were performed in 111, 97 and 119 patients respectively, defining the molecular cytogenetic risk in 96 patients. WT1 was +ve in 91/114 patients (70%) at diagnosis (median 1,231.5; range: 2-268,784), in 11/71 (15.5%) post induction (median 1216; range:260-134,633) and in 8/66 (12,1%) post consolidation (median 627.8; range:258-45,338). MPFC MRD was +ve in 33/66 (50%) patients after induction and in 18/48 (37.5%) after consolidation. We analysed 12 month Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR) adjusted by MRD status, patients and disease characteristics. 82/99 patients achieved CR, 40 relapsed in a median of 8 months (1-52 months) 29 within 12 months with 37.5% 1 yr CIR. Patients receiving chemotherapy (38), Autologous (14) and Allogeneic Transplant (39) as post consolidation treatment had 45%, 35% and 30% 1 yr CIR respectively. NPM+FLT3- patients had 25% 1 yr CIR, compared to 25% in NPM-FLT3-, 50% in NPM+FLT3+ and 47% in NPM-FLT3+. Patients with WT1 positive post induction and consolidation had 1 year CIR of 90% and 72.5% respectively. Patients with MPFC positive post induction and consolidation had a 1 year CIR of 48.6% and 44.5% respectively. Multivariate analysis identified post induction WT1 positive status as the main predictor of 1 year CIR. Patients with WT1 positive after induction had a a 15.8 RR of 1 year CIR(p50,000/ml at diagnosis) and age>60 yrs also significantly predicted 1 year CIR with a RR of 7.22 (p=0.002) and 9.1 (p=0.001) respectively. In conclusion WT1 post induction status confirmed its prognostic significance in our series targeting a subset of early relapsing patients with an extremely poor outcome deserving experimental approaches. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Up to 40% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) respond to pharmacological doses of epoetin. Darbepoetin alfa (DPO) has a longer half-life and greater biological activity. Recent data suggest a 60% response rate in patients receiving DPO. We report preliminary results of a Phase II study in 41 patients with low and intermediate-1 risk MDS and Hb < 11 g/dL. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the efficacy of DPO for the treatment of anemia of MDS. Secondary endpoints are the evaluation of the safety of DPO and of the variations in Hb, the number of monthly transfusions and quality of life (QoL) in treated patients. Patients receive DPO 150 mcg s.c weekly to be doubled in non-responders. Treatment target is Hb =12.0 g/dL. Treatment is to be temporarily interrupted for Hb >12 g/dL and re-initiated when Hb Results: The 33 patients who received at least 8 weeks of DPO included 19M/14F of median age 74 (range 49–84) years. Morphology was: 31 RA, 1 RARS and 1 CMML. IPSS score was low in 75%, and Int-1 in 25%. Serum epoetin levels were < 200 mU/ml. Meduab Hb level at baseline was 9.5 (range 7.0–10.8) g/dL. Six patients had previously received epoetin alfa or beta without success. Thirteen patients (39%) were transfusion-dependent. At the initial dosage, 6 transfusion-free patients (30%) responded at 4 weeks (3 reached the endpoint of Hb=12.0 g/dL). Total number of cases responding at 8 weeks were 17, including 7 (53%) transfusion-dependent patients. Ten responses were minor (30%) and 7 major (21%). After dosage doubling, there were 56% responders of the 16 patients that have completed the study at 24 weeks: 7 of 12 transfusion-free patients (2 at a dosage of 150 mcg/wk, 2 at 300 mcg/wk and 3 at 300 mcg every 3 weeks) and 2 of 4 transfusion-dependent patients at a dosage of 300 mcg/wk. Five patients reached Hb > 12g/dl during the study period. Finally, 3 of the 6 patients previously unresponsive to epoetin responded to DPO. At univariate ANOVA analysis, response to treatment was associated with increases in QOL-E treatment outcome index (p=0.033), specific (p=0.009), fatigue (p= 0.013), physical (p=0.001), functional (p=0.042), social (0.001), general (p=0.001), and total (p=0.004) scores. There were significant reductions in CD34+ cells (p=0.025) and apoptotic cells (p=0.008) and these were associated with treatment response (p=0.045 and p=0.065, respectively). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: DPO is safe and well-tolerated in patients with MDS. A reduction in apoptotic cells is observed during treatment. Therapeutic response is associated with improvements in QoL. Our study suggests that DPO is effective for the treatment of anemia of MDS.

Introduction: Bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylating agent, exerts a mechanism of action different from that of other conventional alkylators despite it remains mostly unknown. In patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed-refractory MM bendamustine has proven to be active either as monotherapy or in combination with new drugs, particularly bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents. Methods: The preliminary results of this prospective, phase II study conducted in 22 Italian centres are recently published (Blood Cancer J. 2013, 3: e162). Here we present the conclusive results of the combination Bendamustine (70 mg/m2 days 1, 8), Bortezomib (1.3 mg/ m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) and Dexamethasone (20 mg days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) (BVD) administered every 4 weeks in patients with relapsed-refractory MM of any age, with adequate cardiac, liver and hematological function, not refractory to bortezomib and treated with no more than four previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint of this study was achievement of a response at least PR, as to IMWG criteria, after four cycles of BVD. Patients achieving a response less than a PR were taken off-study. Patients obtaining at least a PR received two additional treatment cycles followed by a 12-months consolidation phase with cycles repeated every 2 months. Therefore, patients with a PR after the induction phase could receive up to 18 months of treatment and up to 12 cycles of BVD. Results: 75 patients were included in the study. Median age was 68 years (range 41-85 years), 26.5% had ISS stage 3, 19% IgA myeloma and 9% renal failure. Eight of 36 evaluable patients (22%) had high-risk cytogenetics. Patients had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range 1-4). All patients had received prior treatment with new drugs, such as thalidomide (57%), lenalidomide (54.5%), bortezomib (46.5%) or both (20%). Twenty-four patients (32%) were refractory to IMIDs. Best response rate was 75%, including 14 CRs (20%), 22 VGPRs (24%) and 27 PRs (31%). Five patients (6.5%) died early. Only prior treatment with bortezomib significantly reduced the response rate ≥ PR (48.5% vs 80%; P = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 27 months (range 18-38), 45 patients had progressed and 43 had died. Median TTP and PFS were 17 and 12.5 months, respectively while median OS was 24 months (40% at 3 years). After longer follow-up, prior therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide was confirmed as the only factor that significantly reduced TTP (9 vs 19 months; HR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.3-5.8; P = 0.009), PFS (9 vs 15 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.8; P = 0.020) and OS (17 vs 32 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.9; P = 0.043). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 55% of patients leading to therapy reduction in 24% and to protocol discontinuation in 11% of patients. The most frequent severe adverse events were thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (20%), infections (12%), peripheral neuropathy (9%), gastrointestinal (5%) and cardiovascular events (4%). Compared with younger, patients aged > 70 years had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 side effects particularly thrombocytopenia and infections with, consequently, a higher rate of therapy reduction and discontinuation. Moreover, 4/5 early deaths occurred in patients aged more than 70 years. Conclusions: BVD combination is an effective and well tolerated regimen in relapsed-refractory MM. Data suggest that the optimal target of BVD maybe patients younger than 70 years who has not previously received both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Disclosures Offidani: Mundipharma, Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bendamustine. Corvatta:Janssen: Honoraria. Ballanti:Janssen: Honoraria. Brunori:Janssen: Honoraria.

We reviewed eight cases that were diagnosed before 1995 with B-prolymphocytic leukaemia (B-PLL) harbouring t(11;14)(q13;q32) and/or cyclin D1 staining. Thirteen B-PLL patients without t(11;14) were selected as controls. Peripheral blood, bone marrow and histological sections were re-examined without cytogenetic information. Final diagnosis was made using morphology, cytogenetics, immunophenotype and immunohistochemistry. Clinical characteristics were similar for both groups except for younger age, male predominance and extranodal involvement in cases with t(11;14). CD5 was more frequently positive in the t(11;14)+ group (80%) than in the t(11;14)- group (31%). Surface membrane immunoglobulin was strongly expressed by all t(11;14)+ cases, but only 45% of t(11;14)- cases. Histopathological and cytological review of cases with t(11;14) showed an infiltrate with a mixture of cells, some resembling prolymphocytes and others with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) morphology. Blood films of cases with t(11;14) showed features suggestive of B-PLL in three, and in others, a mixture of cells resembling MCL and nucleolated ones; none corresponded to the blastoid form of MCL. We suggest that 'B-PLL' with t(11;14) may represent a splenomegalic form of MCL evolving with leukaemia. These cases illustrate the importance of tissue diagnosis with cyclin D1 staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in B-cell leukaemia with prolymphocytic features.

Abstract 4394 Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (t-AML/MDS) are common after alkylating agents. t-AML/MDS related to alkylating agents are associated with monosomies or deletions of the long arm of chromosomes 5 and 7. Among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the potential for disease transformation to diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Richter's syndrome) or the evolution to prolymphocytic leukemia is well known. However, the development of therapy related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) or t-AML is uncommon. In most trials, an incidence rate of 1% has been reported. We describe here a patient who developed t-AML twentyone years after treatment with chlorambucil and fludarabine for CLL, carrying a typical CLL-associated Chromosomal abnormality (CA), associated with a typical AML-related CA. In 1988 a 42-year-old man was found to have B-cell CLL (Binet stage B). Examination of the marrow showed infiltration by small lymphoid cells that expressed CD5, CD19, CD23, and weak surface immunoglobulin with lambda light chain restriction. The residual hematopoiesis was otherwise normal in morphology. During subsequent years he received courses of therapy with chlorambucil and fludarabine which resulted in partial remission. In June 2009 he developed pancytopenia (WBC 11.4×10e9/L, PMN 0.1×10e9/L, Hgb 7.7g/dL, PLT 26×10e9/L). Physical examination showed small, diffuse lymphadenopaties and splenomegaly. Peripheral blood film examination and immunophenotype were consistent with diagnosis of CLL. Bone marrow examination showed trilineage myelodisplasia with 25% blasts and 62% lymphocytes that expressed CD5, CD19, CD23 and sIg lambda, confirming the diagnosis of concurrent AML with multilineage dysplasia and CLL. Cytogenetic analysis showed a hyperdiploid karyotype with a number of chromosomes comprised between 47 and 55. FISH analysis of bone marrow showed del 5q in 50% of nuclei and biallelic deletion of 13q14 in 70% of nuclei. FISH analysis on peripheral blood confirmed deletion 13q14 in 80% of nuclei, and del 5q in 10% of nuclei; trisomy of 18 in 50% of nuclei was also present. Although patients with CLL have an increased risk for the development of second malignancies, solid tumors are most common. With regard to second hematologic malignancies, the risk of multiple myeloma in patients with CLL is increased 10-fold over the incidence of myeloma in the general population. However, AML develops in 1% or fewer of patients with CLL, despite the frequent and long-term use of alkylating agents for therapy, the older age of many of these patients, and their relatively long survival with this disease process. In a retrospective review by Robertson et al of 1,374 CLL patients who received care at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1972 to 1992, only three cases of MDS or AML were found. Seventy-two percent of these patients had received prior alkylator therapy. Anecdotal cases of myelodysplasia or AML occurring in untreated patients with CLL have been reported, as have cases of concomitant diagnoses of CLL and AML, although these are quite uncommon. These cases of secondary leukemia were generally refractory to therapy, with a median survival after diagnosis of approximately 1 month. Lenalidomide (Revlimid) is an immunomodulatory drug that yields a high frequency of erythroid, pathologic, and cytogenetic response in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with an interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del 5q). Responses of AML with del 5q are also reported. Whether both the diseases will respond to this drug it is matter to prospectively investigate in these cases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

In the past decade, thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide have emerged as highly active agents in the treatment of MM. However, the optimal schedule and association of these drugs is still under investigation. Thalidomide has shown to be highly thrombogenic in induction therapy, especially in patients with high tumor burden, while Bortezomib (BOR) is not; moreover BOR does not affect peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and it has also been used in combination with Melphalan (MEL) before ASCT. Both in vitro laboratory data and preliminary phase II trials suggest synergistic effects when BOR is combined with Cyclophosphamide (CY); this drug is effective in treatment of MM and is not stem cell toxic. We started a pilot study in high risk MM patients, fit for ASCT, combining BOR, CY and dexamethasone (DEX) as induction and mobilizing therapy (CY-BOR), followed by supplemented BOR-ASCT, to determine: 1-feasibility and Response Rate (RR): percentage of complete remission (CR) and near CR (nCR) at day + 90 after ASCT; 2- clearance of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) both in PBSC harvest and in bone marrow at day +90 after SCT; the percentage of plasma cells (PC) in PBSC harvested has been assessed by flow cytometry (FC), by using CD38, CD45, CD56, CD138, CD19, kappa and lambda staining. Patients receive three 3-weeks treatment cycles with BOR 1.3 milligrams/squared-meter/dose on days 1,4,8,11, in combination with DEX 40 milligrams/day i.v. on days 1,4,8,11 and CY i.v. 300 milligrams/squared-meter/dose on days 1,8,15. After the third course, patients achieving at least PR, undergo PBSC mobilization with BOR 1.3 milligrams/squared-meter/dose on days 1,4,8,11 in combination with DEX 40 milligrams/day i.v. on days 1,4,8,11 and CY i.v. 3000 milligrams/squared-meter/dose on day 8; Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (5 micrograms/kilogram) is given starting on day 9. Patients who successfully mobilize an adequate PBSC amount are planned to receive conditioning regimen, combining high-dose MEL(on day -1) with BOR (1.3 milligrams/squared-meter/dose on days -8 and -4). At present 10 patients (6 female and 4 male; median age: 71) have been enrolled and 8 are evaluable for response before PBSC harvest; 4 patients have been mobilized: in all of them we were able to collect a sufficient PBSC amount (median 11.1; range 3–11.2 CD34+ cells/kilograms) and to perform ASCT. Conditioning was well tolerated and was followed by quick engraftment: the median time to neutrophils>500/mcl was 9 days and 12 days for unsupported platelets count>20,000/mcl, without major extrahematological toxicity. With a minimum follow-up of 90 days after ASCT, 3 evaluable patients are alive, two in VGPR and one in CR; with a median follow up of 108 days (range 95–201) all 10 patients are alive and 100% of the evaluable patients achieved at least PR after only 2–3 courses of CY-BOR (table 1). The hematological toxicity was negligible and we did not observe neither thromboembolic events nor grade 3–4 neurotoxicity. Only one patient experienced a transient increase of liver enzymes during the first two courses of therapy. The study of MRD by flow cytometry in PBSC harvest of two evaluable patients shows complete clearance of plasmacells; in the others the MRD study is still ongoing and complete data will be further presented. This preliminary experience shows that this schedule is well tolerated and very effective also in elderly patients, allowing to collect a clonal plasmacells free harvest. Whether this will translate in an “in vivo” MRD clearance after ASCT, it should be confirmed by a longer follow up and by a PCR monitoring with patients specific probes (which is still ongoing). Pts UPN Age Sex Stage ISS Previous lines of treatment Response before PBSC mobilization Harvest: CD34+ cell amount SCT Status at last Follow-up 1 59 F III A III 1 nCR 3,99×106/kg Yes A&W (CR) 2 68 M III B III 2 nCR 11×106/kg Yes A&W (nCR) 3 73 F III A III 0 VGPR 11,2×106/kg Yes A&W (VGPR) 4 72 F III A II 1 VGPR 3×106/kg Yes A&W (VGPR) 5 69 M II A I 0 PR NE NE A&W 6 77 F III A II 1 PR NE NE A&W 7 52 M III A III 0 PR NE NE A&W 8 74 F III B II 2 VGPR. NE NE A&W 9 64 F II B II 3 N.E. NE NE A&W 10 73 M III A II 0 N.E. NE NE A&W Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients and outcome Legenda: ISS: International Staging System; NE: not evaluable; A&W: alive and well; VGPR: very good partial remission