Search

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenia. In the past year, the classification of MDS has been updated in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia with incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Furthermore, the more comprehensive International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) allows for improved risk stratification and prognostication. These three developments allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making in view of the expanding treatment options in MDS. For patients with lower risk MDS, treatment is aimed at improving cytopenias, usually anemia. The recent approval of luspatercept and decitabine/cedazuridine have added on to the current armamentarium of erythropoietic stimulating agents and lenalidomide (for MDS with isolated deletion 5q). Several newer agents are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for this group of patients, such as imetelstat and oral azacitidine. This review provides a summary of the classification systems, the prognostic scores and clinical management of patients with lower risk MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are broadly categorized as lower- and higher-risk with lower-risk dominated by cytopenias and higher-risk plagued by the risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The management of MDS utilize a risk-adapted approach aimed at ameliorating cytopenias in lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and preventing AML transformation in higher-risk MDS. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative intent therapy in higher-risk MDS; however, it is not routinely recommended in LR-MDS in view of unfavorable risk/benefit ratio. Therefore, the goal of treatment in LR-MDS is aimed at improving the transfusion burden and health related quality of life. Currently, erythropoiesis stimulating agents (recombinant erythropoietin), erythroid maturation agents (luspatercept), disease modifying agents (lenalidomide) and hypomethylating agents are the agents of choice in the treatment of LR-MDS. This review will discuss the current treatment standards, meaningful clinical outcomes, and emerging therapies in LR-MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Estimating and modifying thrombotic risk is currently the mainstay of care for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). In recent years, however, increased attention has shifted towards quality of life and disease modification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in risk stratification, present updated results for ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials, discuss new approaches in antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, and summarize early phase trials of novel agents and emerging therapeutic concepts for the treatment of PV and ET. Recent Findings: International collaborations and novel technologies, i.e., next-generation sequencing and machine learning techniques, have demonstrated excellent abilities to improve thrombotic risk stratification in PV and ET. Updated results from ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials have confirmed excellent efficacy and safety of these agents, both as first- and second-line treatments. Early trials of novel agents (histone deacetylase inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase-1 inhibitors, human double-minute 2 inhibitors, and hepcidin mimetics) have shown encouraging efficacy and safety in blood count control, reduction of splenomegaly, and alleviation of disease-related symptoms. Finally, accumulating evidence suggested that direct oral anticoagulants may be a valid therapeutic alternative to warfarin for prolonged thromboprophylaxis. Summary: International collaborations ("big data") with the help of new technologies represent an exciting new approach to analyze rare outcomes in rare diseases, especially for identifying novel prognostic biomarkers in PV and ET. Randomized clinical trials are also needed to fully elucidate whether novel agents may establish new standards of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit including a robust symptom response rate and potential overall survival benefit in IMbark, a phase II study in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) patients who have relapsed after or are refractory to JAK inhibitors. We describe the rationale and design for the phase III trial, IMpactMF (NCT04576156), an open-label evaluation of imetelstat versus best available therapy, excluding JAK inhibitors, in MF patients refractory to JAK inhibitor. Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg is administered as an intravenous infusion every 21 days. Primary objective is to assess overall survival. Secondary objectives include symptom and spleen responses, progression-free survival, clinical response assessment, bone marrow fibrosis reduction, safety and pharmacokinetics. Biomarker, cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed. Imetelstat is a new type of treatment being studied in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Encouraging clinical benefits were seen in a phase II clinical trial of imetelstat in higher risk MF. This article discusses the ongoing phase III trial, called IMpactMF. IMpactMF is comparing imetelstat to best available therapy (BAT) in MF patients not responding to a specific type of treatment, a JAK inhibitor. Imetelstat is an intravenous infusion, given every 21 days. This study will determine if patients who receive imetelstat live longer than patients who are given BAT. It will also collect information on additional outcomes, including safety. Trial Registration Number: NCT04576156 (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies that are stratified into high-risk (HR-MDS) and low-risk (LR-MDS) categories. Until recently, LR-MDS has been typically managed by supportive measures and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); whereas management of HR-MDS typically included hypomethylating agents and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, the limited rates and durations of response observed with these interventions prompted the search for targeted therapies to improve the outcomes among patients with MDS., Areas Covered: Here, we review the current landscape of targeted therapies in MDS. These include pyruvate kinase and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) activators; TGF-beta, telomerase, BCL2 and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors; as well as novel approaches targeting inflammation, pyroptosis, immune evasion, and RNA splicing machinery., Expert Opinion: This review highlights the progress and challenges in MDS treatment. Despite some promising results, many therapies remain in early development or have faced setbacks, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease's pathobiology. Continued research into targeted therapies, homogenous clinical trial designs, as well as increased incorporation of molecular prognostic tools and artificial intelligence into trial design are essential for developing effective treatments for MDS and improving patient outcomes.

Simple Summary: About 20% of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience refractory disease or relapse, despite receiving intensive therapy. Leukemia stem cells (LSC) have the ability to evade chemotherapy and propagate the disease leading to chemoresistance and relapse. Therefore, treatment options that are able to eliminate LSCs are likely to be more effective in prolonging disease-free survival. We have tested the effect of imetelstat, a potent inhibitor of telomerase activity that specifically kills LSCs, on pediatric AML cells in culture and in mouse models. Imetelstat was effective in specifically killing LSCs and extended animal survival when used as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or epigenetic drug azacitidine. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in children remains deadly, despite the use of maximally intensive therapy. Because leukemia stem cells (LSCs) significantly contribute to chemoresistance and relapse, therapies that specifically target the LSCs are likely to be more beneficial in improving outcome. LSCs are known to have high telomerase activity and telomerase activity is negatively correlated with survival in pediatric AML. We evaluated the preclinical efficacy of imetelstat, an oligonucleotide inhibitor of telomerase activity in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines of pediatric AML. Imetelstat treatment significantly increased apoptosis/death of the LSC population in a dose-dependent manner in six pediatric AML PDX lines ex vivo, while it had limited activity on the stem cell population in normal bone marrow specimens. These results were validated in vivo in two distinct PDX models wherein imetelstat as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy greatly reduced the LSC percentage and prolonged median survival. Imetelstat combination with DNA hypomethylating agent azacitidine was also beneficial in extending survival. Secondary transplantation experiments showed delayed engraftment and improved survival of mice receiving imetelstat-treated cells, confirming the diminished LSC population. Thus, our data suggest that imetelstat represents an effective therapeutic strategy for pediatric AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given its rarity, multi-faceted clinical presentation and the relative paucity of approved therapies, the management of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) can be challenging. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, the only approved agents at present, have brought many clinical benefits to patients, with prolongation of survival also demonstrated for ruxolitinib. However, these agents have clear limitations. Optimal management of anemia in MF remains a major unmet need. Neither ruxolitinib nor fedratinib is recommended for use in patients with severe thrombocytopenia, i.e. platelets <50 × 109/L, who have a particularly poor prognosis. The search for the optimal partner for JAK inhibitors to address some of the shortcomings of these agents (e.g. limited ability to improve bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias and induce molecular responses) and achieve meaningful 'disease modification' continues. This has led to the development of a number of rational, preclinically synergistic combinations for use either upfront or in the setting of sub-optimal response to JAK inhibition. Finally, the outlook for patients whose disease progresses on JAK inhibitor therapy continues to be grim, and agents with alternative mechanisms of action may be needed in this setting. In this article, we use a case-based approach to illustrate challenges commonly encountered in clinical practice and our management of the same. Fortunately, there has been enormous growth in drug development efforts in the MF space in the last few years, some of which appear poised to bear fruit in the very near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the MYF2001 trial, treatment of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-relapsed/refractory intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks demonstrated encouraging median overall survival of 29.9 months. To provide historical context, external real-world data (RWD) were collected from a study of 96 patients who had discontinued ruxolitinib and were subsequently treated with best available therapy (BAT) at Moffitt Cancer Center. A closely matched cohort was identified using the MYF2001 eligibility criteria, including patients with MF who had discontinued ruxolitinib due to lack or loss of response. Overall survival was measured from time of JAK inhibitor discontinuation to death or censored at last follow-up. To improve comparability, propensity score weighting approaches using average treatment effect for overlap population (ATO) and stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used for 10 critical baseline covariates. Fifty-seven patients treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg from MYF2001 and 38 patients treated with BAT from RWD were analyzed with improved balanced baseline covariates after propensity score adjustment, showing significantly lower risk of death with imetelstat compared with BAT (hazard ratio: 0.35; p = 0.0019). With sIPTW, results were similar. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. In conclusion, treatment with imetelstat was associated with longer overall survival compared to BAT (30 vs 12 months, respectively) in closely matched patients with MF after JAK inhibitor failure, warranting further evaluation of imetelstat in this poor-prognosis patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Imetelstat (GRN163L) is a potent and specific telomerase inhibitor currently in clinical development for the treatment of hematological malignancies such as myelofibrosis and myelodysplastic syndrome. It is a 13-mer N3′-P5′ thio-phosphoramidate oligonucleotide covalently functionalized at the 5′-end with a palmitoyl lipid moiety through an aminoglycerol linker. As a competitive inhibitor of human telomerase, imetelstat directly binds to the telomerase RNA component sequence (hTR) in the catalytic site of the enzyme and acts as a direct competitor of human telomere binding. Administration of imetelstat causes progressive shortening of the telomeres, thereby inhibiting malignant cells' proliferation. We report here the ability of imetelstat to form stable, parallel, intermolecular G-quadruplex structures in vitro. The impact of the ionic environment on the formation and stability of imetelstat higher-order structure was investigated through circular dichroism spectroscopy, thermal denaturation analysis, and size-exclusion chromatography. We demonstrated that different structural elements, such as the 5′-palmitoyl linker and the thio-phosphoramidate backbone, critically contribute to G-quadruplex stability. Experiments further showed that G-quadruplex formation does not hamper binding to the hTR oligonucleotide sequence in vitro. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Refining clinical endpoints is crucial for addressing the challenges in high-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (HR MDS). • Novel classification systems address the inherent complexities in cross-study comparisons and patient management. • Understanding and mitigating adverse effects within clinical trials is crucial to enhance patient safety in HR MDS. Recent developments in high-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (HR MDS) treatment are confronted with challenges in study design due to evolving drug combinations with Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs). The shift from the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) to its molecular revision (IPSS-M) has notably influenced research and clinical practice. Introducing concepts like the MDS/AML overlap complicate classifications and including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in MDS studies introduces another layer of complexity. The International Consortium for MDS emphasizes aligning HR MDS criteria with the 2022 ELN criteria for AML. Differences in advancements between AML and MDS treatments and hematological toxicity in HR MDS underline the importance of detailed trial designs. Effective therapeutic strategies require accurate reporting of adverse events, highlighting the need for clarity in criteria like the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). We provide an overview on negative clinical trials in HR MDS, analyze possible reasons and explore possibilities to optimize future clinical trials in this challenging patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal diseases resulting from the accumulation of genetic mutations. In general, MDS is categorized into two risk groups, with management and treatment varying significantly based on this classification. Over the past two decades, allogeneic transplantation and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have become the standard of care and remain crucial for higher-risk MDS. Unfortunately, no new drugs have emerged to replace HMAs as the standard of care. However, the landscape of practice and research in MDS has evolved. In 2022, the focus of diagnostic classification of MDS shifted significantly from morphology to genetic alterations. As a result, treatment strategies centered on genetic mutations are now already used internationally. Revisions made to the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for assessing treatment response in 2023 are expected to further improve accuracy. Meanwhile, interest has increased in understanding the relationship between inflammation and the development and progression of lower-risk MDS. This year, luspatercept, an anti-anemic agent targeting the TGFβ pathway, became available for clinical use in Japan. Various research initiatives are currently underway to develop new medicines targeting specific molecules within innate immune and inflammasome-signaling pathways, including IL-1β, CD33, TLR, IRAK4, and p38MAPK.

Introduction: Myelofibrosis is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, increased bone marrow fibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, abnormal cytokine production, and constitutional symptoms. These and many other factors contribute to the development of anemia in myelofibrosis patients., Areas Covered: This review summarizes novel and promising treatments for anemia in myelofibrosis including transforming growth factor-β inhibitors luspatercept and KER-050, JAK inhibitors momelotinib, pacritinib, and jaktinib, BET inhibitors pelabresib and ABBV-744, antifibrotic PRM-151, BCL2/BCL-XL inhibitor navitoclax, and telomerase inhibitor imetelstat., Expert Opinion: Standard approaches to treat myelofibrosis-related anemia have limited efficacy and are associated with toxicity. New drugs have shown positive results in myelofibrosis-associated anemia when used alone or in combination.