Search

Background Cough variant Asthma (CVA) is defined as chronic cough without wheezing, and may be precursor of typical asthma. Thus, the diagnosis of CVA and early intervention can partly inhibit asthma progression.This study aimed to evaluate the role of spirometry in diagniosis of Cough variant Asthma in Iranian Children. Materials and Methods This descriptive observational study included a total of 73 patients, who were referred to the specialized lung clinic of Tabriz Pediatric Center, Tabriz city, Iran. Patients were divided into two groups with classic asthma (n=37) and cough variant asthma (n=36) and basic spirometry parameters such as FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF 25-75% and PEF were measured, and the spirometry findings of each individual were measured based on the European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria. Results The mean of FEV1 and FVC in the classic asthma group were 83.45 ± 20.49% and 86.45 ± 21.57%, respectively; and in the cough variant asthma group were 87.44 ± 13.99% and 86.8 ± 14.71%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the basic spirometry parameters of FEV1 and FVC (p=0.343, P=0.916; respectively). The average FEV1/FVC parameter in the cough variant asthma group was 89.44±13.07, but it was 72.35±8.47 in the classic asthma group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p

Background Cough variant asthma (CVA) is a chronic or recurrent cough without wheezing accompanied by bronchial hyper-responsiveness and eosinophilic inflammation of the airways. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of spirometry in the diagnosis of CVA, as well as determining the specificity and sensitivity of spirometry parameters in CVA. Materials and Methods This descriptive observational study was conducted from March 2015 to February 2016. The subjects were 73 patients 5 to 15 years of age who referred to the pulmonology clinics of Tabriz Pediatric Center, Tabriz city, Iran. The patients were divided into two groups of classic asthma (n=37), and CVA (n=36). Basic spirometry parameters such as FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75% were measured and the spirometry findings of each individual were measured based on European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria. After intervention (β2 (beta2) adrenergic receptor agonists as bronchodilator test), in two groups, spirometry was again performed. The FEV1/FVC and FEF 25-75% parameters were examined for intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (version 16.0). Results Cut-off points for the diagnosis of CVA and classic asthma were obtained using FEV1/FVC and FEF 25-75% spirometry. The cut-off point for FEV1/FVC for the diagnosis of CVA was calculated to be 80%. When the FEV1/FVC ratio was higher than 80%, diagnosis of CVA was possible with a specificity of 94.59%, and sensitivity of 66.67%. These findings suggest a specificity and sensitivity of 94.59%, and 66.67%, respectively, for the diagnosis of classic asthma (with an FEV1/FVC ratio of below 80%). Analysis showed a positive predictive value of 100% for CVA at FEF 25-75% with a negative predictive value of 55.4%. Conclusion Spirometry can be a sensitive method for the diagnosis of CVA at a FEF 25-75% below 65%; however, it lacks the specificity for accurate diagnosis of CVA.

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic and progressive mental disorder related to the childhood period. This study aims to compare the oral health of two groups of ADHD children: those under pharmacotherapy and those under neuro-feedback therapy. Material and methods 72 ADHD children (aged 6-12) were divided into two 36 member groups: The pharmacotherapy group and the neuro-feedback therapy group. Unstimulated salivary flow (USF), DMFT, and plaque index were assessed in these children. Statistical analysis was carried out on the data with the independent t-test, which was performed using SPSS 16. The significance level of the study was p Results In this study, the USF of ADHD children who used Ritalin was found to be significantly less than that of the neuro-feedback group (1.25 ± 1.21 vs. 1.91 ± 1.16 ml/min; p=0.002). Also, the plaque index (5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 3.94 ± 1.9; p=0.018) and DMFT scores (39% ± 9% vs. 31% ± 9%; p=0.018) were significantly higher for the pharmacotherapy group. Conclusions Neuro-feedback therapy is preferable to Ritalin treatment for ADHD children in terms of their oral health status. Key words:Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, drug therapy, neurofeedback, oral health.