Search

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), but a proportion of patients had no clinical benefit and even experienced detrimental effects. This study aims to characterise patients experiencing hyperprogression (HPD) and early death (ED) by longitudinal liquid biopsy. Methods aNSCLC receiving ICIs were prospectively enrolled. Plasma was collected at baseline (T1) and after 3/4 weeks of treatment, according to the treatment schedule (T2). Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was quantified and analysed by NGS. cfDNA quantification and variant allele fraction (VAF) of tumour-associated genetic alterations were evaluated for their potential impact on outcome. The genetic alteration with the highest VAF (maxVAF) at baseline was considered as a reference. Results From March 2017 to August 2019, 171 patients were enrolled. Five cases matched criteria for HPD and 31 ED were recorded; one overlapped. Quantification of cfDNA at T2 and its absolute and relative variation (T2–T1) were significantly associated with the risk of ED (P = 0.012, P = 0.005, P = 0.009). MaxVAF relative change (T2–T1/T1) was significantly associated with the risk of HPD (P = 0.02). After identifying optimal cut-off values, a two-step risk assessment model was proposed. Discussion Liquid biopsy performed early during treatment has the potential to identify patients at high risk of ED and HPD.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor, and despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients usually have a short survival. There are no clinically relevant predictive factors of responses to therapies, and therapeutic options are still limited.Clinical data and somatic mutations of genes included in the MSK-IMPACT panel were retrieved from cBioPortal for 108 SCLCs and analyzed to identify mutated gene networks. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 54 SCLCs, whose information was also available from cBioPortal.Different networks were observed in tumors of short and long survivors. Degree (K) and betweenness (B) are key features that characterize a gene in its network of related mutations. By comparing their B/K ratio, 2 signatures of mutated genes were identified, describing short (IL-7R, NTRK2, HNF-1A) and long survivors (NBN, PTPN-11, IRS-1, INPP-4A, PIK-3CG, HGF, LATS-2, SMARCA-4, FLT-3, EIF-4A2, SPEN, PAX-5, SH2-D1A, ARID-1A, HOXB-13, ERCC-4, FANCA, FH, FGFR-2, MST-1R, SMAD-4, DDR-2, IGF-1R, PIK-3CB). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the short signature had a worse median overall survival of 8 versus 28 months (P.001). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the long signature had a better median overall survival of 39 versus 20 months (P = .004). The value of the short signature was further confirmed in an independent cohort of SCLCs.The networks of mutated genes could help subclassify SCLCs based on their somatic mutations and aid in identifying a subset of tumors with poor prognosis.

ImportanceThe use of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB-IIIA resected non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has limited benefit for improving cure rates. The proportion of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations among patients with resected NSCLC is comparable to that observed in patients with advanced disease, and the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been demonstrated to prolong disease-free survival (DFS). With recent approval of osimertinib in this context, a focus on the rapidly evolving scenario and future perspective in clinical practice is needed and was the aim of the current review.ObservationsRandomized phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated DFS benefit with adjuvant EGFR TKI therapy in patients with resected EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC. The most recent trial (ADAURA) assessed 3-year adjuvant osimertinib and showed consistent DFS benefit and a significant role of the intervention in preventing the occurrence of brain metastasis. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, the appropriate duration of treatment, the management of disease relapse, and the effective cure rate remain undetermined. A deeper investigation on molecular biomarkers, covariant patterns, and dynamic monitoring of postsurgical circulating DNA would be helpful for the implementation of future strategies to further improve survival rates after adjuvant therapy for EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC.Conclusions and RelevanceAdjuvant osimertinib revolutionized the treatment algorithm for patients with stage IB-IIIA resected EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC. Further evidence driven by clinical issues will be key for further optimization of the goals of adjuvant treatment in these patients.

The adoption of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) allowed the achievement of impressive long-term survival results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients develop resistance to ICI treatment over time. Resistance to ICIs is mediated by several complex mechanisms affecting, but not limited to, tumour cell-intrinsic alterations and the tumour microenvironment. The possibility of modulating the immune response by interfering with specific alternative immune receptors, pathways and mediators might provide additional strategies to delay or prevent the development of resistance. Therefore, a greater in-depth investigation and understanding of these mechanisms aims to identify novel classes of immune targets and subsequently to evaluate potential new strategies for overcoming resistance, which will be assessed in this review.

Background: The role of MET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing and several targeted agents are under evaluation. MET exon 14 skipping mutations and MET amplifications are associated with potential sensitivity to MET inhibition, though resistance mechanisms are emerging. In MET addicted cells, MET inhibition leads to activation of proviral integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus-1 (PIM1). PIM1 and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (SRC) can regulate the expression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), potentially inducing resistance to MET inhibition through cross-activation. Methods: We evaluated the activity of class I-II MET inhibitors, the SRC inhibitor dasatinib, and panPIM inhibitors in four MET addicted cell lines. We assessed the effect of the dual MET/PIM and MET/ SRC inhibition on cell viability and at the protein level. We evaluated RNA expression profiles of the cell lines. Advanced NSCLCs were also screened for MET alterations. Results: All cell lines were sensitive to class I-II MET inhibitors. All cell lines were resistant to single PIM and SRC inhibition. Dual MET/PIM inhibition was synergistic or additive in MET amplified cell lines and dual MET/SRC inhibition was highly synergistic in all MET addicted cell lines. The addition of an SRC inhibitor partially prevents the RTKs cross-activation. MET alterations were found in 9 out of 97 evaluable samples (9.3%); median overall survival in MET altered patients was 5 months (95% CI, 3 m-NA). Conclusions: We identified a potential role of PIM inhibition in MET amplified tumors and of SRC inhibition in MET addicted tumors. Potential applications of this new treatment strategy warrant further evaluation.

Background Liquid biopsy has the potential to monitor biological effects of treatment. KRAS represents the most commonly mutated oncogene in Caucasian non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to explore association of dynamic plasma KRAS genotyping with outcome in advanced NSCLC patients. Methods Advanced NSCLC patients were prospectively enrolled. Plasma samples were collected at baseline (T1), after 3 or 4 weeks, according to treatment schedule (T2) and at first radiological restaging (T3). Patients carrying KRAS mutation in tissue were analysed in plasma with droplet digital PCR. Semi-quantitative index of fractional abundance of mutated allele (MAFA) was used. Results KRAS-mutated cohort included 58 patients, and overall 73 treatments (N = 39 chemotherapy and N = 34 immune checkpoint inhibitors) were followed with longitudinal liquid biopsy. Sensitivity of KRAS detection in plasma at baseline was 48.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.0–61.8). KRAS mutation at T2 was associated with increased probability of experiencing progressive disease as best radiological response (adjusted odds ratio: 7.3; 95% CI: 2.1–25.0, p = 0.0016). Increased MAFA (T1–T2) predicted shorter progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2–3.8, p = 0.0142) and overall survival (adjusted HR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.2–8.4, p = 0.0168). Conclusions Longitudinal analysis of plasma KRAS mutations correlated with outcome: its early assessment during treatment has great potentialities for monitoring treatment outcome in NSCLC patients.

The selective RET-inhibitor pralsetinib has shown therapeutic activity in early clinical trials in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions. To date, the real-world efficacy of pralsetinib in this population is unknown.A retrospective efficacy and safety analysis was performed on data from patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC enrolled in the pralsetinib Italian expanded access program between July 2019 and October 2021.Overall, 62 patients with RET-fusion positive NSCLC received pralsetinib at 20 Italian centers. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect RET alterations in 44 patients (73 %). The most frequent gene fusion partner was KIF5B (75 % of 45 evaluable). Median age was 62 years (range, 36-90), most patients were female (57 %) and never smokers (53 %). Brain metastases were known in 18 patients (29.5 %) at the time of pralsetinib treatment. 13 patients were treatment naïve (unfit for chemotherapy), 48 were pretreated (median number of previous lines: 1, range, 1-4). The objective response rate (ORR) was 66 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 53-81] in the evaluable population (n = 59). The disease control rate (DCR) was 79 %. After a median follow-up of 10.1 months, the median progression free survival was 8.9 months (95 %CI, 4.7-NA). In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 6) intracranial ORR was 83 %, intracranial DCR was 100 %. Overall, 83.6 % of patients experienced any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 39 % grade 3 or greater (G ≥ 3). The most common G ≥ 3 TRAEs were neutropenia (9.8 %), dry mouth/oral mucositis (8.2 %), and thrombocytopenia (6.6 %). Seven patients (12 %) discontinued pralsetinib due to TRAEs, twenty-six had at least one dose level modification due to TRAEs. Two treatment-related deaths were observed (1 sepsis, 1 typhlitis).In the real-world setting, pralsetinib confirmed durable systemic activity and intracranial response in RET-fusion positive NSCLC. Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports.

Introduction: The treatment scenario of lung cancer is rapidly evolving through time. In parallel, growing evidence is accumulating on different mechanisms of treatment resistance. Inter- and intra...

Background: Pembrolizumab is approved in monotherapy for the first-line (1L) of advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 (≥50%). Despite a proportion of patients achieve long-term survival, about one-third of patients experience detrimental survival outcomes, including early death, hyperprogression, and fast progression. The impact of clinical factors on early progression (EP) development has not been widely explored. Methods: We designed a retrospective, multicenter study involving five Italian centers, in patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, treated with Pembrolizumab in a 1L setting. EP was defined as a progressive disease within three months from pembrolizumab initiation. Baseline clinical factors of patients with and without EP were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify clinical factors associated with EP and an EP prognostic score was developed based on the logistic model. Results: Overall, 321 out of 336 NSCLC patients treated with 1L pembrolizumab provided all the data for the analysis. EP occurred in 137 (42.7%) patients, the median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.9–4.7), and median OS was not reached in the entire study population. Sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), steroids, metastatic sites ≥2, and the presence of liver/pleural metastasis were confirmed as independent factors for EP by multivariate analysis. By combining these factors, we developed an EP prognostic score ranging from 0–13, with three-risk group stratification: 0–2 (good prognosis), 3–6 (intermediate prognosis), and 7–13 (poor prognosis). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70–0.81). Conclusions: We identified six clinical factors independently associated with EP. We developed a prognostic score model for EP-risk to potentially improve clinical practice and patient selection for 1L pembrolizumab in NSCLC with high PD-L1, in the real-world clinical setting.

Background: Characterization of tumor-related genetic alterations is promising for the screening of new predictive markers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Aim of the study was to evaluate prognostic and predictive role of most frequent tumor-associated genetic alterations detected in plasma before starting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Between January 2017 and October 2019, advanced NSCLC patients were prospectively screened with plasma next- generation sequencing (NGS) while included in two trials: VISION (NCT02864992), using Guardant360 (R) test, and MAGIC (Monitoring Advanced NSCLC through plasma Genotyping during Immunotherapy: Clinical feasibility and application), using Myriapod NGS-IL 56G Assay. A control group of patients not receiving ICIs was analyzed. Results: A total of 103 patients receiving ICIs were analyzed: median overall survival (OS) was 20.8 (95% CI: 16.7-24.9) months and median immune-related progression free disease (irPFS) 4.2 (95% CI: 2.3-6.1) months. TP53 mutations in plasma negatively affected OS both in patients treated with ICIs and in control group (P=0.001 and P=0.009), indicating a prognostic role. STK11 mutated patients (n=9) showed a trend for worse OS only if treated with ICIs. The presence of KRAS/STK11 co-mutation and KRAS/STK11/TP53 co-mutation affected OS only in patients treated with ICIs (HR =10.936, 95% CI: 2.337-51.164, P=0.002; HR =17.609, 95% CI: 3.777-82.089, P

Molecular heterogeneity characterizes tumours’ evolution and adaptation and, because of its dynamics and continuous changes under external pressure, it is one of the major causes of drug resistance, contributing to therapy failure. Several studies reported evidence of molecular events occuring in individual tumours, including monoclonal or polyclonal resistance, and primary or secondary resistance mechanisms. While primary resistance is a phenomenon already present at the diagnosis of a tumor, the acquired one is strongly related to the selective pressure of treatments administered. Therefore, the pharmacological characteristics of a drug, including its potency, binding affinity and structure, largely influence the mechanism of resistance that will arise at the progression of the disease. As an example, the lung cancer experience clearly demonstrated that the highest is the potency of a drug on its target, the more are the possibilities that the mechanism of resistance will arise independently of the target itself. The present review is focused on tumour heterogeneity and its relation to resistance to targeted-therapy, based on treatment selective pressure across different tumour types, including lung, colorectal, prostate, breast cancer and melanoma. The mechanisms of resistance based on the drug potency and the selective pressure of treatments are discussed, leading to new drug developments or new therapeutic combinations.

In February 2020, Italy became one of the first countries to be plagued by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, COVID-19. In March 2020, the Italian government decreed a lockdown for the whole country, which overturned communication systems, hospital organization, and access to patients and their relatives and carers. This issue had a particular regard for cancer patients. Our Thoracic Oncology Division therefore reorganized patient access in order to reduce the risk of contagion and, at the same time, encourage the continuation of treatment. Our staff contacted all patients to inform them of any changes in treatment planning, check that they were taking safety measures, and ascertain their feelings and whether they had any COVID-19 symptoms. To better understand patients’ fears and expectations of during the pandemic period, we created a nine-question interview, administered from April to May 2020 to 156 patients with lung cancer. Patients were classified by age, sex, comorbidity, disease stage, prior treatment, and treatment type. The survey showed that during the pandemic period some patients experienced fear of COVID-19, in particular: women (55% vs. 33%), patients with comorbidities (24% vs. 9%), and patients who had already received prior insult (radiotherapy or surgery) on the lung (30% vs. 11%). In addition, the patients who received oral treatment at home or for whom intravenous treatment was delayed, experienced a sense of relief (90% and 72% respectively). However, only 21% of the patients were more afraid of COVID-19 than of their cancer, in particular patients with long-term (> 12 months) vs. short-term cancer diagnosis (28% vs. 12.5%, respectively). Furthermore, the quarantine period or even just the lockdown period alone, worsened the quality of life of some patients (40%), especially those in oral treatment (47%). Our data demonstrate how lung cancer patients are more afraid of their disease than of a world pandemic. Also this interview indirectly highlights the clinician’s major guiding principle in correctly and appropriately managing not just the patient’s expectations of their illness and its treatment, but also and especially of the patient’s fears.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent one of the main steps forward for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), without oncogenic driver alterations. Despite this recent progress, only a minority of patients achieve a broad and durable benefit and another proportion report poor survival and sometimes fast disease progression, confirming the need to optimise the patient's selection. To date, several issues are unsolved about how to personalise the immunotherapy treatment for individual patients. In this review, analysing data from pivotal randomised clinical trials (RCTs), we discuss patient baseline clinical and demographic features, including sex, age, ECOG performance status, smoking habit and specific site of metastases (liver, bone and brain) that may influence the efficacy outcomes in patients treated with ICIs. The high performance of the ICIs blurred the vision on different efficacy-limiting factors, which require extensive evaluation to improve the understanding ofthe tumour-specificimmune response, in which clinical drivers could be useful for better patient stratification.

A novel coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), named SARS-CoV-2, was identified at the end of 2019. The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has progressively expanded from China, involving several countries throughout the world, leading to the classification of the disease as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). According to published reports, COVID-19 severity and mortality are higher in elderly patients and those with active comorbidities. In particular, lung cancer patients were reported to be at high risk of pulmonary complications related to SARS-CoV2 infection. Therefore, the management of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic is a crucial issue, to which national and international oncology organizations have replied with recommendations concerning patients receiving anticancer treatments, delaying follow-up visits and limiting caregiver admission to the hospitals. In this historical moment, medical oncologists are required to consider the possibility to delay active treatment administration based on a case-by-case risk/benefit evaluation. Potential risks associated with COVID-19 infection should be considered, considering tumor histology and natural course, disease setting, clinical conditions, and disease burden, together with the expected benefit, toxicities (e.g., myelosuppression or interstitial lung disease), and response obtained from the planned or ongoing treatment. In this study, we report the results of proactive measures including social media, telemedicine, and telephone triage for screening patients with lung cancer during the COVID-19 outbreak in the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy). Proactive management and containment measures, applied in a structured and daily way, has significantly aided the identification of advance patients with suspected symptoms related to COVID-19, limiting their admission to our cancer center; we have thus been more able to protect other patients from possible contamination and at the same time guarantee to the suspected patients the immediate treatment and evaluation in referral hospitals for COVID-19.

A number of treatments have been developed for HER1, 2 and 3-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of which the most successful have been the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER1-mutant tumours resulting in highly improved progression-free survival. Human epidermal growth factor (HER)2 and 3-driven tumours represent the minority of NSCLC, and effective therapies in these patients still represent an unmet medical need. The encouraging results seen with anti-HER2 and anti-HER3 monoclonal antibodies need to be validated in larger studies, even if the greatest obstacle is represented by the exiguous number of patients bearing deregulated HER2/3 system and abnormalities of signal transduction pathway. Considering NSCLC tumour heterogeneity, which affects response and resistance to treatment, combined multiparametric approaches, such as liquid biopsy together with radiomics, may provide a better understanding of the tumour dynamics and clonal selection during the treatments.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a subset of lung cancer with demonstrated response to targeted therapies. However, resistance to the first targeted approach usually occurs within the first year, and it is associated in 50-60% of cases to the T790M resistance mutation. Areas covered: The review provides an overview on the significance of the presence of the T790M mutation, its detection, treatment options and subsequent mechanisms of resistance. Expert commentary: Osimertinib is the current treatment option for T790M mutation positive NSCLC after progression to first or second-generation EGFR TKIs, with activity also on brain metastasis. However, the scenario is in continuous evolution and results from clinical trials are awaited in first-line setting and in combination strategies.

Treatment of locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) is focused on multimodal strategy, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy (in combination or as alternative treatments), followed by surgery in selected cases. Recently, durvalumab consolidation after definitive chemo-radiation has shown a meaningful overall survival benefit. However, it is important to note that elderly patients represent a high proportion of NSCLC population and frailty and comorbidities can significantly limit treatment options. Indeed, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials and data to drive treatment selection in this category of patients are scanty. Available data, main issues and controversies on multimodal treatment in elderly LA-NSCLC patients will be reviewed in this paper.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as one of the main new therapeutic options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Even though they demonstrated superiority towards standard chemotherapy in different disease settings, the response rates do not exceed 45% in highly molecularly selected patients. This is related to known limitations of the available biomarkers, as well to the complex and dynamic nature of tumor microenvironment. The study of the different strategies adopted by tumor cells to escape the immune system lays the basis of the new combination strategies. This review focuses on analyzing the biological rationale and early clinical data available concerning therapeutic strategies combining ICIs together, ICIs with different regimens and schedules of standard chemotherapy, ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ICIs with antiangiogenic agents and ICs with radiotherapy.

Background Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, many patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are usually mild and reversible, but they require timely management and may be life threatening. No predictive markers of irAEs are available. Materials and Methods The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were evaluated in patients with NSCLC consecutively treated with ICIs. Prespecified cutoff values of NLR and PLR were used and related to outcome and onset of irAEs. A control group of patients with advanced NSCLC not receiving ICIs was included. Results The study included 184 patients: 26 (14.1%) received pembrolizumab upfront, and 142 (77%) received ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab or atezolizumab) after one or more lines of chemotherapy. The median number of ICIs cycles was six (range, 1–61). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 (95% CI, 3.4–6.3) and 20.6 (95% CI, 14.7–26.5) months, respectively. Sixty patients (32.6%) developed irAEs, mainly grade 1–2 (65.0%), causing ICI interruption in 46 cases (25.0%). Low NLR and low PLR at baseline were significantly associated with the development of irAEs (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; p = .018 and OR, 2.8; p = .003, respectively). Multivariate analyses confirmed PLR as independent predictive marker of irAEs (OR, 2.3; p = .020). Conclusion NLR and PLR may predict the appearance of irAEs in non-oncogene-addicted aNSCLC, although this conclusion warrants prospective validation.

Liver kinase B1 (LKB1) is a tumor suppressor gene whose inactivation is frequent in different tumor types, especially in lung adenocarcinoma (about 30% of cases). LKB1 has an essential role in the control of cellular redox homeostasis by regulating ROS production and detoxification. Loss of LKB1 makes the tumor cell more sensitive to oxidative stress and consequently to stress-inducing treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. LKB1 loss triggers complex changes in tumor microenvironment, supporting a role in the regulation of angiogenesis and suggesting a potential role in the response to anti-angiogenic treatment. On the other hand, LKB1 deficiency can promote an immunosuppressive microenvironment and may be involved in primary resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1, as it has been reported in lung cancer. The aim of this review is to discuss interactions of LKB1 with the tumor microenvironment and the potential applications of this knowledge in predicting response to treatment in lung cancer.

3046 Background: ICIs revolutionized aNSCLC treatment. The next challenge lays on the search for predictive markers. Detection of multiple tumor-related genetic alterations through NGS in cell free DNA is a promising tool, provided the limited availability of tumor tissue in most cases. Methods: Between January 2017 and October 2019, aNSCLC pts consecutively referring to our Institution were prospectively screened with plasma NGS while included in two clinical trials: VISION (NCT02864992) and MAGIC trial, an observational study. In VISION trial NGS was performed in plasma (Guardant360 test) and tissue (Oncomine Focus Assay). In MAGIC Myriapod NGS-IL 56G Assay was used. Aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of STK11, KRAS and TP53 mutations (muts) on outcome of ICI-treated pts, with overall survival (OS) as primary endpoint. A control group of pts not receiving ICIs was also analyzed. Results: A total of 235 NSCLC pts were enrolled and received ICIs. 93 pts were analyzed in plasma at the time of beginning ICIs: median OS was 18.9 m (95% CI: 13.7-24.1) and median immune-related progression free disease (irPFS) 3.8 m (95% CI: 2.5-5.1). 49 (52.7%), 22 (23.7%) and 8 (8.6%) pts carried TP53, KRAS and STK11 pathogenic alterations, respectively. STK11 mutated pts showed a trend for worse OS compared with wildtype counterpart (14.9 m, 95% CI: 6.5-23.3, versus 20.3, 95% CI: 13.4-27.2, p = 0.192) KRAS muts had no impact on outcome. Pts with TP53 or STK11/KRAS co-mut (n = 3) had worse OS (12.3 m, 95% CI: 9.2-15.4; HR = 3, 95% CI: 1.6-5.8, p = 0.001 and 5.9 m, 95% CI: 1.4-7.6; HR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-6.3, p = 0.007) and worse irPFS (2.8 m, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9, HR = 1.8 95% CI: 1.1-3.1, p = 0.03 and 1.2 m, 95% CI: 0.9-1.5, HR = 2.2 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.01). Number of muts negatively impacts pts’ OS (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3, p = 0.02) and was higher among TP53 mutated pts (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). In multivariate analysis, TP53 and STK11/KRAS retained significance. A control group of pts not receiving ICIs was analyzed (n = 101): median OS was 16.8 m (95% CI: 13-20.6). Nor STK11 (n = 10), nor STK11/KRAS (n = 6) had impact on OS (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 0.7-4.7, p = 0.267 and 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7-3.0, p = 0.293) while the presence of TP53 muts (n = 41) was associated with shorter OS (11.4 m, 95% CI: 7.3-15.5; HR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.2, p = 0.009). Conclusions: NGS performed in plasma might be used to detect predictive markers. TP53 muts in plasma at baseline had prognostic value, while STK11/KRAS muts were associated with worse outcome to ICIs.

Introduction The prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is dismal and new effective therapies are needed. Immunotherapy looks promising, but no molecular predictive markers are currently available, and data on immune microenvironment are very limited. Methods We retrospectively analysed 104 SCLC cases. Immunohistochemistry evaluation of PD-L1 was performed both on tumour cells (TCs) and on tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) by using anti-PD-L1 22C3 antibody (DAKO) and categorised by using 1% as cut-off point. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were characterised by using anti-CD8 and anti-FOXP3 antibodies. Semi-quantitative score was used and categorised as positive versus negative/low. The relation of molecular markers with prognosis and with clinical variables was evaluated. Results The analysis included 66 stage I–III patients (48 surgically resected, 18 treated with radical-intent chemoradiotherapy) and 38 metastatic cases. In the overall study population, PD-L1 was expressed on TCs and TIICs in 25% and 40% of cases, respectively. The proportion of PD-L1-positive cases was significantly higher in stage I–III versus metastatic patients (32% versus 13%, p: 0.034 for TCs; 51.5% versus 21% for TIICs, p: 0.002). CD8- and FOXP3-positive TILs were present in 59% and 72% of samples, respectively. The presence of FOXP3-TILs was associated with improved prognosis among non-metastatic patients, with a hazard ratio for survival of 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16–0.7, p: 0.006) for univariate analysis, and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.17–0.81, p: 0.013) for multivariate analysis. Conclusions Immune contexture of SCLC may differ according to stage. The presence of FOXP3-positive TILs is a potential prognostic marker for stage I–III SCLCs and warrants further investigation.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is incurable, despite high rates of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We investigated receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Src family kinases and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) as genetic modifiers of innate resistance in EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC. We performed gene expression analysis in two cohorts (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2) of EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKI. We evaluated the efficacy of gefitinib or osimertinib with the Src/FAK/Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, TPX0005 in vitro and in vivo. In Cohort 1, CUB domain-containing protein-1 (CDCP1) was an independent negative prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio of 1.79, p = 0.0407) and overall survival (hazard ratio of 2.23, p = 0.0192). A two-gene model based on AXL and CDCP1 expression was strongly associated with the clinical outcome to EGFR TKIs, in both cohorts of patients. Our preclinical experiments revealed that several RTKs and non-RTKs, were up-regulated at baseline or after treatment with gefitinib or osimertinib. TPX-0005 plus EGFR TKI suppressed expression and activation of RTKs and downstream signaling intermediates. Co-expression of CDCP1 and AXL is often observed in EGFR-mutation-positive tumors, limiting the efficacy of EGFR TKIs. Co-treatment with EGFR TKI and TPX-0005 warrants testing., Graphical Abstract Unlabelled Image, Highlights • AXL and CDCP1 are co-expressed in treatment-naïve EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. • AXL and CDCP1 are related to shorter progression-free survival with EGFR inhibitors and shorter overall survival. • Src family kinases and YAP1 are regulatory nodes for AXL and CDCP1 expression. • The combination of EGFR TKI with TPX-0005 is synergistic in EGFR-mutation-positive lung tumors in culture and in vivo. We explore the molecular changes that occur after the application of an EGFR inhibitor in EGFR-mutation positive tumors. The tumors do not acquire secondary drivers to overcome a primary driver but, counter-regulatory nodes observable before treatment, are immediately made apparent by pathway-specific intervention. The expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL and the transmembrane protein CDCP1 in baseline samples of EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC patients can provide us with information on the treatment outcome. The upfront combination of an EGFR inhibitor with a multikinase inhibitor, that controls the regulatory nodes for RTKs activation, is a therapeutic approach that deserves to be further explored.

// Stefano Frega 1, 6, * , Martina Lorenzi 1, * , Matteo Fassan 2 , Stefano Indraccolo 3 , Fiorella Calabrese 4 , Adolfo Favaretto 5 , Laura Bonanno 6 , Valentina Polo 1, 6 , Giulia Zago 6 , Francesca Lunardi 4 , Ilaria Attili 1, 6 , Alberto Pavan 1, 6 , Massimo Rugge 2 , Valentina Guarneri 1, 6 , PierFranco Conte 1, 6 , Giulia Pasello 6 1 Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy 2 Department of Medicine, Surgical Pathology Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy 3 Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy 4 Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy 5 Medical Oncology, Azienda ULSS 9, Treviso, Italy 6 Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy * These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Giulia Pasello, email: giulia.pasello@ioveneto.it Keywords: lung cancer, non-small cell, epidermal growth factor receptor, mutations, tyrosine kinase inhibitors Received: October 28, 2016 Accepted: February 22, 2017 Published: March 06, 2017 ABSTRACT Introduction: Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) represent the best treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common exon 19 deletion or exon 21 epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm). This is an observational study investigating epidemiology, clinical features and treatment outcome of NSCLC cases harbouring rare/complex EGFRm. Results: Among 764 non-squamous NSCLC cases with known EGFRm status, 26(3.4%) harboured rare/complex EGFRm. Patients receiving first-line TKIs ( N = 17) achieved median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 (IC 95%, 2–105) and 84 (CI 95%, 27–141) weeks respectively, without significant covariate impact. Response Rate and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were 47% and 65%, respectively. Uncommon exon 19 mutations achieved longer OS and PFS and higher DCR compared with exon 18 and 20 mutations. No additional gene mutation was discovered by MassARRAY analysis. TKIs were globally well tolerated. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of advanced non-squamous NSCLC harbouring rare/complex EGFRm referred to our Center between 2010 and 2015 was performed. Additional molecular pathways disregulation was explored in selected cases, through MassARRAY analysis. Conclusions: Peculiar clinical features and lower TKIs sensitivity of uncommon/complex compared with common EGFRm were shown. Exon 19 EGFRm achieved the best TKIs treatment outcome, while the optimal treatment of exon 18 and 20 mutations should be further clarified.

Background MET addicted tumors are known to show very short response to single MET inhibition. In MET addicted cells, MET inhibition leads to activation of proviral integration site for Moloney murine leukemia virus-1 (PIM1). PIM1 and SRC can regulate the expression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), potentially being responsible of resistance to MET inhibition. We previously showed that the dual inhibition of MET and PIM1 with class I MET inhibitors and the pan-PIM inhibitor AZD1208, as well as MET and SRC (with dasatinib), is synergistic in MET addicted cell lines. Methods We evaluated the activity of class I and class II MET inhibitors, MET/SRC/CSF1R inhibitor TPX-02226 and pan-PIM inhibitors AZD1208 and PIM447 in four MET addicted cell lines: 2 MET amplified lung cancer cell lines (EBC1 and H1993), 1 MET exon 14 mutant cell line (Hs746T) and 1 MET exon 7-8 splicing variant cell line (E98). We assessed the effect of the dual inhibition of MET and PIM, and the triple inhibition of MET, SRC and PIM in cell viability by combining the TPX-02226 with the pan-PIM inhibitors. Results All cell lines were sensitive to class I-II MET inhibitors (IC50s in nM range) except for cabozantinib in H1993. Only the MET amplified cell lines were sensitive to TPX-02226. All cell lines were resistant to PIM inhibition. The combination of class I MET inhibitors with PIM447 showed stronger synergism in the MET amplified cell lines, compared to the combination with AZD1208. Class I-II MET inhibitors and PIM inhibitor combination showed only additive effect in exon 7-8 cell line E98, while the combination of TPX-02226 and PIM447 was strongly synergistic. Conclusions We identified potential role of PIM inhibition in MET amplified tumors. Even though single agent TPX-02226, AZD1208 or PIM447 showed no activity and dual MET/PIM inhibition showed only additive effect, the triple inhibition of MET, SRC and PIM was strongly effective in MET exon 7-8 splicing variant, suggesting a crucial role of SRC-PIM interaction in this still not well recognized MET addicted tumor. Further investigation on this triple inhibition is ongoing in MET addicted cell lines and role of co-presence of MET and PIM1 and/or SRC alterations in tumor samples. Legal entity responsible for the study IGTP, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain. Funding Fundacio Obra Social “La Caixa”. Disclosure J.J. Cui: Leadership role, Officer / Board of Directors: TP Therapeutics. N. Karachaliou: Officer / Board of Directors: Merck KgaA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.