Search

Abstract Background The combined effects of the patient's and the family's preferences for death at home have in determining the actual site of death has not been fully investigated. We explored this issue on patients who had been receiving end-of-life care from Visiting Nurse Stations (VNS). In Japan, it has been the government's policy to promote end-of-life care at home by expanding the use of VNS services. Methods A retrospective national survey of a random sample of 2,000 out of the 5,224 VNS was made in January 2005. Questionnaires were mailed to VNS asking the respondents to fill in the questionnaire for each patient who had died either at home or at the hospital from July to December of 2004. Logistic regression analysis was respectively carried out to examine the factors related to dying at home for cancer and non-cancer patients. Results We obtained valid responses from 1,016 VNS (50.8%). The total number of patients who had died in the selected period was 4,175 (cancer: 1,664; non-cancer: 2,511). Compared to cancer patients, non-cancer patients were older and had more impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) and cognitive performance, and a longer duration of care. The factor having the greatest impact for dying at home was that of both the patient and the family expressing such preferences [cancer: OR (95% CI) = 57.00 (38.79-83.76); non-cancer: OR (95% CI) = 12.33 (9.51-15.99)]. The Odds ratio was greater compared with cases in which only the family had expressed such a preference and in which only the patient had expressed such a preference. ADL or cognitive impairment and the fact that their physician was based at a clinic, and not at a hospital, had modest effects on dying at home. Conclusions Dying at home was more likely when both the patient and the family had expressed such preferences, than when the patient alone or the family alone had done so, in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Health care professionals should try to elicit the patient's and family's preferences on where they would wish to die, following which they should then take appropriate measures to achieve this outcome.

Objective　Healthcare support workers play an important role in team healthcare. The objective of this study was to develop scales for measuring feelings of difficulty among home healthcare support workers when in collaborative practice with medical professionals.Methods　Scale drafts consisting of 10 questions were developed by an expert panel, using qualitative data from previous studies. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 220 healthcare workers in a certain city using the developed scales, and reliability and validity of the scale were examined.Results　An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, after which two factor structures and six questions were selected. The factors were "feelings of disrespect from medical professionals" and "communication barriers between home healthcare support workers and medical professionals". Cronbach's coefficient alpha was 0.77-0.81 for the scale and its two subscales, which demonstrated good internal consistency. Correlation coefficients between the scale and the face-to-face cooperative confidence questionnaire (FFCCQ) and interdisciplinary collaborative practice scales (ICPS) were estimated to examine the criterion-related validity. As a consequence, the score of the scale had a significant negative correlation with FFCCQ and ICPS (r=-0.36--0.42). The two subscales also had negative correlations with FFCCQ and ICPS (r=-0.17--0.42).Conclusion　The scales we developed were reliable and valid for measuring home healthcare support workers' feelings of difficulty in collaborative practice with medical professionals.