Search

BACKGROUND: Selective neck dissection (SND) is the surgical treatment of choice in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with suspected or manifest metastases in the cervical lymph nodes. For SND to be successful, treated lymph node levels should be selected according to anatomic considerations and the extent of the disease. Aim of this study was to identify neck dissection levels that had an impact on individual prognosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of SND as part of primary treatment of HNSCC. Overall survival (OS) and regional control rates (RCR) were calculated for all patients treated at one academic tertiary referral center. RESULTS: 661 patients with HNSCC were included, 644 underwent ipsilateral and 319 contralateral SND. Average follow-up was 78.9 ± 106.4 months. 67 (10.1%) patients eventually developed nodal recurrence. Tumor sites were oral cavity (135), oropharynx (179), hypopharynx (118) and larynx (229). Tumor categories pT1-pT4a, and all clinical and pathological nodal categories were included. Multivariate analysis indicated improved OS rates for patients undergoing SND in ipsilateral levels I and V as well as level III contralaterally. Analysis for tumor origin showed that SND in ipsilateral level I showed significantly improved OS in HNSCC of the oral cavity. CONCLUSION: The dissection of ipsilateral level I in oral cavity cancer was of particular relevance in our exploratory, retrospective analysis. To clarify the relevance for the determination of the extent of SND, this should be investigated prospectively in a more homogenous patient cohort.

Dupilumab has been shown to be safe and effective in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis (CRSwNP). There is to this date no published data whether subgroups like patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), increased histologic eosinophilia or elevated blood eosinophil or IgE-levels benefit greater from dupilumab therapy. Moreover, there is no data comparing the efficacy of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) with dupilumab therapy. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients that were treated at a tertiary referral center for CRswNP with dupilumab. We also contacted the patients with a questionnaire to evaluate the efficacy of previous surgeries and dupilumab therapy by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the glasgow benefit inventory (GBI) as well as report on side effects. Overall, 75 patients were included in the study at hand that reported back 138 times. While dupilumab treatment was efficient, we found no systematic evidence of greater efficacy of dupilumab in patients with AERD, histologic eosinophilia or increased blood eosinophil or IgE-levels. All patients showed a considerable decrease in subjective burden of disease, objective smell tests and endoscopic findings. From the patients point of view, dupilumab therapy showed greater efficacy both in the VAS and the GBI overall and all subcategories but "social support." Dupilumab is efficient in treating CRSwNP; this effect is independent from disease characteristics like AERD, histologic eosinophilia, serum IgE-levels or eosinophil counts. There seems to be a group of patients that benefit greater from dupilumab therapy compared to FESS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin on cochlear microcirculation, and its mode of action. METHODS: Twenty-five Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were divided into five groups of five animals each. After surgical preparation, cochlear microcirculation was quantified by in vivo fluorescence microscopy. Placebo or LPS (1 mg, 10 µg, and 100 ng) was applied topically, and microcirculation was measured before and twice after application. A fifth group was pretreated with etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist, and afterward the lowest LPS concentrations that yielded significant results (10 µg) were applied. RESULTS: In the groups that had been treated with 1 mg and 10 µg LPS, a significant drop in cochlear microcirculation was observed after 30 (.791 ± .089 Arbitrary Units (AU), compared to baseline, and .888 ± .071AU) and 60 (.756 ± .101 AU and .817 ± .124 AU, respectively) minutes. The groups that had been treated with 100 ng LPS and that had been pretreated with etanercept showed no significant change in cochlear blood flow compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Lipopolysaccharide shows a dose-dependent effect on cochlear microcirculation; this effect can already be observed after 30 min. Pretreatment with etanercept can abrogate this effect, indicating that TNF mediates the effect of LPS on cochlear microcirculation.

PURPOSE: Adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands is of low incidence and a broad range of histopathological subtypes. Cancer stem cell markers (CSC) might serve as novel prognostic parameters. To date, only a few studies examined the expression of CSC in adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands with diverging results. To further investigate the reliability in terms of prognostic value, a histopathological analysis of CSCs on a cohort of patients with adenocarcinomas of the major salivary glands was performed. METHODS: Tumor samples of 40 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the major salivary gland treated with curative intend at one tertiary center were stained with the CSCs ALDH1, BMI-1, CD44, Nanog, and SOX2. Expression of these markers was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and survival estimates. RESULTS: Correlation of high expression of ALDH1 with higher grading (p < 0.001) and high expression of CD44 with the localization of the neoplasm (p = 0.05), larger tumor size (p = 0.006), positive pN-category (p = 0.023), and advanced UICC stage (p = 0.002) was found. Furthermore, high expression of SOX2 correlated with a negative perineural invasion (p = 0.02). No significant correlation of any investigated marker with survival estimates was observed. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study did not find a significant correlation of the investigated CSCs with survival estimates in adenocarcinoma of the major salivary glands. Recapitulating the results of our study in conjunction with data in the literature, the CSCs ALDH1, BMI-1, CD44, Nanog, and SOX2 do not seem to serve as reliable prognostic parameters in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands.

PURPOSE: It has been established that the infection with SARS-CoV-2 may cause an impairment of chemosensory function. However, there is little data on the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on chemosensory function. METHODS: Twenty three SARS-CoV-2-positive patients diagnosed in spring 2020 with subjective hyposmia (out of 57 positive patients, 40.3%) were compared to SARS-CoV-2-positive patients without hyposmia (n = 19) and SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (n = 14). Chemosensory function was assessed by the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT), Taste Strips (TS), Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), and the SNOT-22. The initial cohort with hyposmia were also examined at 8 weeks and 6 months after initial examination. RESULTS: There were no differences between the SARS-CoV-2-positive cohort without hyposmia and negative controls in terms of BSIT (8.5 ± 2.6 vs. 10.2 ± 1.8), TS (3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 0.3) or VAS (2.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.5); yet the SNOT-22 was significantly elevated (27.7 ± 11.2 vs. 16.4 ± 10.8). The SARS-CoV-2-positive group with hyposmia performed significantly poorer in BSIT (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 8.5 ± 2.6/10.2 ± 1.8), TS (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6/3.9 ± 0.3), and VAS (7.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3/1.1 ± 0.5) compared to both control groups. At week 8 and month 6 control, six and five patients, respectively, still suffered from subjectively and objectively impaired chemosensory function. The other patients had recovered in both respects. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 patients with subjectively impaired chemosensory function regularly perform poorly in objective measurements. About 70% of patients suffering from olfactory dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 quickly recover-the rest still suffers from considerable impairment 6 months after infection.