Search

Stem cell research has generated novel therapeutic opportunities at the expense of new ethical and legal problems. Its promoters recommended early clamping of the umbilical cord to maximize the amount of acquired fetal blood. Fear has been expressed, therefore, that the donor could be compromised by this approach. Actually, the problem is more complex than generally assumed. In certain clinical situations the neonate may benefit from or become harmed by additional blood volume. Gravity influences the direction of umbilical blood flow and, thus the consequences of early or delayed cord clamping. Therefore, vaginal birth promotes blood flow from the placenta to the fetus, whereas delivery by cesarean section usually has the opposite effect. Largely ignored in the course of the relevant debates, the above facts require consideration. The controversy may be beneficial in the long run by drawing attention to this relatively neglected aspect of perinatal medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite impressive progress in perinatology, fetal injuries from arrest of the shoulders at birth have not decreased in recent decades. Based upon sporadic reports of Erb's palsy in neonates born by Cesarean section, some obstetricians embraced the theory recently that brachial plexus lesions often derive from spontaneous forces acting in utero. Having reviewed three hundred malpractice claims involving fetal injuries attributed to shoulder dystocia at birth, the authors found only two cases connected with abdominal deliveries. One followed manual replacement of the already delivered fetal head into the pelvis after sequential vacuum and forceps procedures and failed manual extraction of the body. The other was an elective repeat Cesarean section where extensive adhesions limited the available space for the lower segment transverse uterine incision. Coincidental fracture of the clavicle and absence of contractures or deformities indicated that the brachial plexus injury was acute, having resulted from forceful traction at delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Seemingly coincidental occurrence of various pathological conditions may derive from common etiologic denominators. While reviewing 240 malpractice claims involving shoulder dystocia related fetal injuries, we found two antenatal complications in the background conspicuously often. Chronic or pregnancy induced hypertension was identifiable in 80 instances (33%). Pregnancy induced or preexisting diabetes was diagnosed 48 times (20%). Many of these patients were poorly controlled. The blood pressure was usually checked during the antenatal visits. However, about one-half of all patients received no diabetic screening. Therefore, this study may underestimate the actual incidence of diabetes. It has been calculated that the frequency of diabetes in pregnancy and that of hypertension, is about 5% in the United States. Thus, the rates of these complications in this selected group of gravidas was severalfold higher than in the general population. Since hypertension causes retarded fetal growth, it cannot be a direct cause of arrest of the shoulders at delivery. The likely common denominator is maternal diabetes a known predisposing factor both for preeclampsia and shoulder dystocia at birth. In the course of litigations for fetal injuries, demonstration of the predisposing role of seemingly unrelated shortcomings of the medical management may profoundly influence the outcome. This principle is demonstrated by the presentation of an actual malpractice action which resulted in a substantial settlement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]