Search

Background: Oral health is an important aspect of overall health and should be maintained during pregnancy. Due to complex physiological changes during pregnancy, the pregnant woman is at risk for developing periodontal disease and dental caries which are associated with poor birth outcomes including preterm births and low birthweight infants. Evidence-based guidelines developed by several professional organizations recommend oral screening be included in the first prenatal visit. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement a dental screening tool during prenatal care to identify pregnant patients with oral health needs and provide subsequent referrals to a dentist., Methods: The project was implemented over a 14-week period and included an oral health screening using a valid and reliable tool to identify oral health needs. Patients were screened and received a referral for dental care., Results: N = 826 pregnant women were screened. Of those screened 36.3% (n = 300) had not had their teeth cleaned in the past 12 months. More than 30% of pregnant patients (n = 316) reported some type of dental problem, 29.5% (n = 244) were screened during the first prenatal visit, and 36.7% (n = 303) were enrolled in Medicaid. At project completion, 74.6% (n = 616) of patients received dental referrals., Conclusion: Conducting oral health screenings during the first prenatal visit is important for identifying pregnant women at risk for oral health problems and improving birth outcomes and allows the patient time to visit the dentist prior to birth. Integration of an oral health screening and referral process can be successfully implemented during prenatal care to meet the needs of childbearing women., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe opioid prescribing practice patterns and trends in emergency department visits (EDs) by provider type: physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs), which include nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs)., Methods: The data source was the ED visit files of the 2005-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey. The study sample was opioid prescription-related ED visits. Descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the proportion of opioid prescription-related visits by provider type over time in total and by patient age group. We then characterized opioid prescribing practices of NPs, PAs, and physicians according to type of opioid and pain-related diagnosis., Results: From 2005 to 2015, there was a 116.7% increase in the proportion of the opioid prescription-related visits seen by NPs and a 61.2% increase seen by both APPs and physicians. In contrast, the proportion of the physician-only visits decreased (-8.3%). When stratified by age group, the growth was particularly notable among the visits with patients aged 65 and older seen by both APPs and physicians (AOR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.69, 3.25). Proportionally less hydromorphone and morphine was prescribed by APPs than by physicians. Opioids were prescribed more often by APPs in visits involving dental and injury-related pain, whereas physicians prescribed opioids more in abdominal and chest pain-related visits., Conclusions: From 2005 to 2015, APPs, particularly NPs played an increasing role in opioid prescribing in EDs. Opioid prescribing practices of APPs and physicians varied by patient condition as well as by opioid type., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)