Search

PURPOSE: Patients' values and priorities in their lives should be appreciated from an early phase of incurable diseases such as advanced cancer. However, studies examining these characteristics have been lacking. This study attempted to determine what patients with advanced lung cancer valued most, once they had been diagnosed, and any associated factors. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer (N = 248) were enrolled in a questionnaire survey conducted at 16 hospitals in Japan. Their priorities were assessed using a free-text response to the question what is the most important thing to you now? at the time of diagnosis and 3 months after diagnosis. The free-text responses were classified into 10 categories for quantification. The clinical characteristics associated with the category describing daily life were further examined. RESULTS: Free-text comments were obtained from 103 (44.0%) and 66 (42.6%) patients at the time of diagnosis and at 3 months, respectively. The most frequent categories were family (at diagnosis: 50.5%; at 3 months: 50.0%) and daily life (at diagnosis: 33.0%; at 3 months: 36.4%), followed by health (at diagnosis: 32.0%; at 3 months: 27.3%) at both time points. The patients mentioning daily life, the issues related to how to spend daily life, showed significantly higher total scores and functional well-being subscale scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scale at both time points and lower depression scores at diagnosis and lower anxiety scores at 3 months on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CONCLUSION: Family and daily life were highly valued by patients with advanced lung cancer at diagnosis. A better quality of life and better mood were associated with mentioning daily life, which should be taken into account in care planning to maintain patients' involvement in daily life even with incurable diseases.

Purpose: We evaluated plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue-based sequencing concordance for comprehensive oncogenic driver detection in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a large-scale prospective screening cohort (LC-SCRUM-Liquid). Experimental Design: Blood samples were prospectively collected within 4 weeks of corresponding tumor tissue sampling from patients with advanced NSCLC to investigate plasma cfDNA sequencing concordance for alterations in 8 oncogenes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, MET, ALK, RET, and ROS1) compared with tissue-based next-generation targeted sequencing. Results: Paired blood and tissue samples were obtained in 1,062/1,112 enrolled patients with NSCLC. Oncogenic alteration was detected by plasma cfDNA sequencing and tissue assay in 455 (42.8%) and 537 (50.5%) patients, respectively. The positive percent agreement of plasma cfDNA sequencing compared with tissue DNA and RNA assays were 77% (EGFR, 78%; KRAS, 75%; BRAF, 85%; HER2, 72%) and 47% (ALK, 46%; RET, 57%; ROS1, 18%; MET, 66%), respectively. Oncogenic drivers were positive for plasma cfDNA and negative for tissue due to unsuccessful genomic analysis from poor-quality tissue samples (70%), and were negative for plasma cfDNA and positive for tissue due to low sensitivity of cfDNA analysis (61%). In patients with positive oncogenic drivers by plasma cfDNA sequencing but negative by tissue assay, the response rate of genotype-matched therapy was 85% and median progression-free survival was 12.7 months. Conclusions: Plasma cfDNA sequencing in patients with advanced NSCLC showed relatively high sensitivity for detecting gene mutations but low sensitivity for gene fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. This may be an alternative only when tissue assay is unavailable due to insufficient DNA and RNA. See related commentary by Jacobsen Skanderup et al., p. 1381

Purpose:We evaluated plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue-based sequencing concordance for comprehensive oncogenic driver detection in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a large-scale prospective screening cohort (LC-SCRUM-Liquid).Experimental Design:Blood samples were prospectively collected within 4 weeks of corresponding tumor tissue sampling from patients with advanced NSCLC to investigate plasma cfDNA sequencing concordance for alterations in 8 oncogenes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, MET, ALK, RET, and ROS1) compared with tissue-based next-generation targeted sequencing.Results:Paired blood and tissue samples were obtained in 1,062/1,112 enrolled patients with NSCLC. Oncogenic alteration was detected by plasma cfDNA sequencing and tissue assay in 455 (42.8%) and 537 (50.5%) patients, respectively. The positive percent agreement of plasma cfDNA sequencing compared with tissue DNA and RNA assays were 77% (EGFR, 78%; KRAS, 75%; BRAF, 85%; HER2, 72%) and 47% (ALK, 46%; RET, 57%; ROS1, 18%; MET, 66%), respectively. Oncogenic drivers were positive for plasma cfDNA and negative for tissue due to unsuccessful genomic analysis from poor-quality tissue samples (70%), and were negative for plasma cfDNA and positive for tissue due to low sensitivity of cfDNA analysis (61%). In patients with positive oncogenic drivers by plasma cfDNA sequencing but negative by tissue assay, the response rate of genotype-matched therapy was 85% and median progression-free survival was 12.7 months.Conclusions:Plasma cfDNA sequencing in patients with advanced NSCLC showed relatively high sensitivity for detecting gene mutations but low sensitivity for gene fusions and MET exon 14 skipping. This may be an alternative only when tissue assay is unavailable due to insufficient DNA and RNA.See related commentary by Jacobsen Skanderup et al., p. 1381

Supplementary Figure S1. Consort diagram. Supplementary Figure S2. Frequency of the targetable gene alterations detected by plasma cfDNA sequencing (A) and tissue assay (B) in squamous cell carcinoma Supplementary Figure S3. Positive percent agreement of plasma cfDNA sequencing compared to tissue assay according to patient characteristics. PPA, positive percent agreement. Supplementary Figure S4. Positive percent agreement of plasma cfDNA sequencing compared to tissue assay according to metastatic site. PPA, positive percent agreement.

Supplementary Table S1 Patient characteristics in patients with 8 oncogene drivers and squamous cell carcinoma Supplementary Table S2 Detectability of eight oncogenic alterations by plasma cfDNA sequencing compared to tissue assay Supplementary Table S3 Detectability of eight oncogenic alterations by plasma cfDNA sequencing compared to tissue assay in patients only with brain metastasis Supplementary Table S4 Clinical outcomes of patients treated with a genotype-matched therapy who had oncogenic alterations detected by only plasma cfDNA sequencing.

Chromosomal instability is central to the process of carcinogenesis. The genome-wide detection of somatic chromosomal alterations (SCA) in small premalignant lesions remains challenging because sample heterogeneity dilutes the aberrant cell information. To overcome this hurdle, we focused on the B allele frequency data from single-nucleotide polymorphism microarrays (SNP arrays). The difference of allelic fractions between paired tumor and normal samples from the same patient (delta-θ) provides a simple but sensitive detection of SCA in the affected tissue. We applied the delta-θ approach to small, heterogeneous clinical specimens, including endobronchial biopsies and brushings. Regions identified by delta-θ were validated by FISH and quantitative PCR in heterogeneous samples. Distinctive genomic variations were successfully detected across the whole genome in all invasive cancer cases (6 of 6), carcinoma in situ (3 of 3), and high-grade dysplasia (severe or moderate; 3 of 11). Not only well-described SCAs in lung squamous cell carcinoma, but also several novel chromosomal alterations were frequently found across the preinvasive dysplastic cases. Within these novel regions, losses of putative tumor suppressors (RNF20 and SSBP2) and an amplification of RASGRP3 gene with oncogenic activity were observed. Widespread sampling of the airway during bronchoscopy demonstrated that field cancerization reflected by SCAs at multiple sites was detectable. SNP arrays combined with delta-θ analysis can detect SCAs in heterogeneous clinical sample and expand our ability to assess genomic instability in the airway epithelium as a biomarker of lung cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res; 7(2); 255–65. ©2013 AACR.

XLS - 100K, The list of SCAs detected by delta-theta in clinical specimens.

PDF - 85K, Different concepts of delta-theta and modified BAF.

PDF - 138K, The comparisons of representative delta-θ signals between 2 different methods of DNA isolation from brushing.

PDF - 212K, Histology grade of overall biopsies in individual patients with preinvasive lesions.

PDF - 240K, Overall segmentation results across the entire autosomal chromosomes in the genomic DNA titration series.

PDF - 79K, Legends for Supplementary Figures 1 through 5

PDF - 494K, Detection and validation of SCAs in a heterogeneous cancer case by FISH assays.

Supplementary Figure from A Large-Scale Prospective Concordance Study of Plasma- and Tissue-Based Next-Generation Targeted Sequencing for Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (LC-SCRUM-Liquid)

Supplementary Data from A Large-Scale Prospective Concordance Study of Plasma- and Tissue-Based Next-Generation Targeted Sequencing for Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (LC-SCRUM-Liquid)

Summary Background Bevacizumab is a promising candidate for combination treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (eg, erlotinib), which could improve outcomes for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We have previously shown in NEJ026, a phase 3 trial, that the combination of bevacizumab plus erlotinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in these patients. In further analyses, we aimed to examine the effects of bevacizumab–erlotinib on overall survival, time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death, and quality of life. Methods This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial (NEJ026) was done in 69 hospitals and medical, community-based centres across Japan. Eligible patients had stage IIIB, stage IV, or postoperative recurrent, EGFR-mutant (exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg point mutation) NSCLC, had not previously received systemic chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence and minimisation to receive either 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 21 days, or 150 mg oral erlotinib once daily, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified according to sex, smoking status, EGFR mutation subtype, and clinical disease stage. All participants, investigators, and study personnel (including those assessing outcomes) were unmasked to treatment allocation. We report the secondary outcomes of overall survival and quality of life (the period from enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30), and the exploratory outcome of time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death. Overall survival and the exploratory outcome were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had response evaluations. Quality of life was analysed in patients in the modified intention-to-treat population who had completed the quality of life questionnaires. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000017069, and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031180056, and is currently closed. Findings Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were enrolled. 112 patients who received bevacizumab–erlotinib and 112 who received erlotinib only were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (Nov 30, 2019) and a median follow-up of 39·2 months (IQR 23·9–43·5), the median overall survival was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3–not estimable [NE]) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 46·2 months (38·2–NE) in the erlotinib-only group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·007, 95% CI 0·681–1·490; p=0·97). In analysis of the exploratory outcome, after a median follow-up of 23·9 months (IQR 14·2–39·1), the median time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment or death was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1–35·9) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 24·3 months (20·4–29·1) in the erlotinib-only group (HR 0·773, 95% CI 0·562–1·065). The median time between enrolment and confirmation of a minimally important difference on the EORTC QLQ-C30 was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2–11·3) in the bevacizumab–erlotinib group and 8·3 months (5·7–13·9) in the erlotinib-only group (p=0·47). Interpretation The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not prolong survival in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC, but both treatment groups had relatively long survival durations. Why the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib did not affect overall survival is unclear, but it is possible that the beneficial effects of combination therapy were not seen because overall survival was influenced by treatment regimens used after disease progression. Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumour types. Targeted therapies stratified by oncogenic drivers have substantially improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)1. However, such oncogenic drivers are not found in 25–40% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological subtype of NSCLC2. Here we identify a novel fusion transcript of CLIP1 and LTK using whole-transcriptome sequencing in a multi-institutional genome screening platform (LC-SCRUM-Asia, UMIN000036871). The CLIP1–LTK fusion was present in 0.4% of NSCLCs and was mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic drivers. We show that kinase activity of the CLIP1–LTK fusion protein is constitutively activated and has transformation potential. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CLIP1–LTK with lorlatinib, an ALK inhibitor, inhibited CLIP1–LTK kinase activity, suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. One patient with NSCLC harbouring the CLIP1–LTK fusion showed a good clinical response to lorlatinib treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first description of LTK alterations with oncogenic activity in cancers. These results identify the CLIP1–LTK fusion as a target in NSCLC that could be treated with lorlatinib. Whole-transcriptome sequencing of a subset of 75 non-small-cell lung cancer specimens in a multi-institutional genome screening study identified a fusion of the CLIP1 and LTK genes with transformational potential due to constitutive LTK kinase activity.

Background: Both advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers experience distress and have a range of concerns after cancer diagnosis. However, longitudinal studies on this topic have been lacking. Aim: To investigate concerns in both patients with advanced lung cancer and their family caregivers longitudinally from diagnosis. Design: A multi-center prospective questionnaire-based study. Setting/participants: We recruited patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their family caregivers at 16 hospitals in Japan. We prospectively assessed the prevalence of their concerns using the Concerns Checklist and investigated the associations between their concerns and mental status as well as quality of life until 24 months after diagnosis. Results: A total of 248 patients and their 232 family caregivers were enrolled. The prevalence of serious concerns was highest at diagnosis (patients: 68.3%, family caregivers: 65.3%). The most common serious concern was concern about the future in both groups at diagnosis (38.2% and 40.5%, respectively) and this remained high in prevalence over time, while the high prevalence of concern about lack of information improved 3 months after diagnosis in both groups. Approximately one-third of patient-family caregiver dyads had discrepant reports of serious concerns. The presence of serious concerns was significantly associated with anxiety and depression continuously in both groups. Conclusions: The majority of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers have serious concerns from diagnosis, which is associated with their psychological distress. The spectrum of concerns alters over the disease trajectory, warranting efficient tailored care and support for both groups immediately after diagnosis.

SummaryThe detailed mechanisms of COVID-19 infection pathology remain poorly understood. To improve our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 pathology, we performed a multi-omics analysis of an immunologically naïve SARS-CoV-2 clinical cohort from the plasma of uninfected controls, mild, and severe infections. A comparison of healthy controls and patient samples showed activation of neutrophil degranulation pathways and formation of neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) complexes that were activated in a subset of the mild infections and more prevalent in severe infections (containing multiple NET proteins in individual patient samples). As a potential mechanism to suppress NET formation, multiple redox enzymes were elevated in the mild and severe symptom population. Analysis of metabolites from the same cohort showed a 24- and 60-fold elevation in plasma L-cystine, the oxidized form of cysteine, which is a substrate of the powerful antioxidant glutathione, in mild and severe patients, respectively. Unique to patients with mild infections, the carnosine dipeptidase modifying enzyme (CNDP1) was up-regulated. The strong protein and metabolite oxidation signatures suggest multiple compensatory pathways working to suppress oxidation and NET formation in SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Background Osimertinib is recommended for T790M mutation‐positive advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to first‐ and second‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, some reports exist on the real‐world use of osimertinib; however, reports involving third/later‐line use are few. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib used in various treatment lines for T790M‐positive NSCLC patients. Methods This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included T790M‐positive advanced/recurrent NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib from May 2016 to March 2018. The clinical characteristics, efficacy, and adverse events were retrospectively investigated. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to analyze progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS‐associated clinical characteristics were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 60.7% and 91.1%, respectively; the median PFS was 11.0 months. There were no significant differences in the median PFS for patients treated with osimertinib as second‐line and third−/later‐line (14.5 vs. 11.0 months respectively, P = 0.327). Analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model for clinical features affecting PFS also revealed no significant factors. Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 15 patients (26.8%); the most common were anemia (n = 3) and cutaneous toxicity (n = 3). Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in one patient; any‐grade pneumonitis was observed in six patients (10.7%), including one with grade 3 pneumonitis. Conclusions Osimertinib demonstrated efficacy even when administered as third−/later‐line treatment to NSCLC patients. Osimertinib‐related pneumonitis was observed more frequently than previously reported. Key points Significant findings of the study Osimertinib shows efficacy even as later‐line treatment in T790M mutation‐positive NSCLC patients previously treated with EGFR‐TKIs. However, the incidence of ≥ grade 3 adverse events, especially pneumonitis, was higher than that previously reported by other studies. What this study adds Osimertinib was approved for previously EGFR‐TKI‐treated EGFR T790M‐positive NSCLC. With the increasing frequency of its use as first‐line treatment, this study provides valuable evidence for the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for previously EGFR‐TKI‐treated NSCLC.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a recently-emerged infectious disease that has caused millions of deaths, where comprehensive understanding of disease mechanisms is still unestablished. In particular, studies of gene expression dynamics and regulation landscape in COVID-19 infected individuals are limited. Here, we report on a thorough analysis of whole blood RNA-seq data from 465 genotyped samples from the Japan COVID-19 Task Force, including 359 severe and 106 non-severe COVID-19 cases. We discover 1169 putative causal expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) including 34 possible colocalizations with biobank fine-mapping results of hematopoietic traits in a Japanese population, 1549 putative causal splice QTLs (sQTLs; e.g. two independent sQTLs at TOR1AIP1), as well as biologically interpretable trans-eQTL examples (e.g., REST and STING1), all fine-mapped at single variant resolution. We perform differential gene expression analysis to elucidate 198 genes with increased expression in severe COVID-19 cases and enriched for innate immune-related functions. Finally, we evaluate the limited but non-zero effect of COVID-19 phenotype on eQTL discovery, and highlight the presence of COVID-19 severity-interaction eQTLs (ieQTLs; e.g., CLEC4C and MYBL2). Our study provides a comprehensive catalog of whole blood regulatory variants in Japanese, as well as a reference for transcriptional landscapes in response to COVID-19 infection., 「コロナ制圧タスクフォース」COVID-19患者由来の血液細胞における遺伝子発現の網羅的解析 --重症度に応じた遺伝子発現の変化には、ヒトゲノム配列の個人差が影響する--. 京都大学プレスリリース. 2022-08-23.

This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical course of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer with histologic transformation (HT).We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer who received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of HT. The secondary outcome was treatment efficacy in patients with HT.In total, 6356 patients were enrolled. In 2624 patients, the histological type was proven by rebiopsy after acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Among them, 74 patients had HT (incidence rate: 2.8% [95% confidence interval: 2.3%-3.5%]). The median progression-free survival after EGFR-TKIs and first-line therapy after confirming HT was 10.4 and 4.4 months, respectively, which was not significantly different between patients with transformation to high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma and those with transformation to another subtype of non-small cell lung cancer. Overall survival after confirming HT was 12.2 months. Twenty-seven patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors: 6 and 21 received immune checkpoint inhibitors before and after confirming HT, respectively. No patients achieved 1-year progression-free survival. The median progression-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after confirming HT was 1.6 months.HT occurred in approximately 3% of EGFR-mutated patients who developed resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Cytotoxic agents are likely to be effective in patients with HT. However, the therapeutic effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors was limited in these patients. Given the rarity of HT and absence of prospective trials, our findings are important to inform the treatment of these patients.

Tetsuo Tani,1– 3 Ichiro Nakachi,1,4 Shinnosuke Ikemura,1 Shigenari Nukaga,1,5 Keiko Ohgino,1,6 Aoi Kuroda,1,7 Hideki Terai,1,8 Keita Masuzawa,1,8 Taro Shinozaki,1 Kota Ishioka,1,9 Yohei Funatsu,1,2 Hidefumi Koh,1,2 Koichi Fukunaga,1 Kenzo Soejima1,10 On behalf of the Keio Lung Oncology Group (KLOG)1Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 3Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 4Department of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan; 5Department of Respiratory Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; 6Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan; 7Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan; 8Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 9Department of Medicine, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; 10Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Ichiro NakachiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, 911-1 Takebayashimachi, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 321-0974, JapanTel +81- 28-626-5500Fax +81- 28-626-5594Email nichiro4747@gmail.comBackground: Metastatic peritoneal carcinomatosis (MPC) is not common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes are still unclear.Patients and Methods: We recruited 46 NSCLC patients with MPC at Keio University and affiliated hospitals (Keio Lung Oncology Group) between January 2011 and December 2017, then retrospectively investigated their clinical characteristics and the impact of treatment interventions on their survival.Results: The profile of histological subtype was predominantly adenocarcinoma and 15 patients harbored driver oncogenes. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that performance status and the presence of a driver oncogene were significantly associated with the prolonged overall survival (OS). Regarding treatment, the median OS in the treatment group (9.3 months) was significantly longer than in the best supportive care group (1.3 months) (P < 0.0001).Conclusion: The prognosis of MPC in NSCLC patients who receive only the best supportive care is poor, but therapeutic intervention may improve prognosis.Keywords: metastatic peritoneal carcinomatosis, NSCLC, EGFR, malignant ascites, peritoneal nodule, intraperitoneal dissemination

Background Accurate prognostic understanding in patients with advanced cancer is essential for shared decision making; however, patients may experience psychological burden through knowing the incurable nature of advanced cancer. It has been unclear how their prognostic understanding fluctuates and whether accurate prognostic understanding is associated with psychological distress from the time of diagnosis over time. Materials and Methods We longitudinally investigated prognostic understanding in 225 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer at 16 hospitals in Japan until 24 months after diagnosis. We examined associated factors with being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding, especially focusing on its association with psychological well-being. Results The proportion of patients with an inaccurate prognostic understanding remained approximately 20% over time with the presence of patients with inconsistent understanding. Patients with consistently accurate prognostic understanding showed a significantly lower Emotional Well-Being subscale score at both 3 and 6 months after diagnosis (p = .010 and p = .014, respectively). In multivariate analyses, being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding was significantly associated with female gender and higher lung cancer–specific symptom burden at 3 months (p = .008 and p = .005, respectively) and lower emotional well-being at 6 months (p = .006). Conclusion Although substantial proportions of patients with advanced lung cancer had inaccurate prognostic understanding from the time of diagnosis over time, patients with consistently accurate prognostic understanding experienced greater psychological burden. Our findings highlight the importance of continuous psychological care and support for patients who understand their severe prognosis accurately. Implications for Practice This study demonstrated that approximately 20% of patients with advanced lung cancer had an inaccurate understanding about their prognosis, not only at the time of diagnosis but also at the later time points. Being consistently accurate in prognostic understanding was significantly associated with elevated levels of psychological distress. Although accurate prognostic understanding is essential for decision making for treatment and advance care planning, health care providers should be aware of psychological burdens in patients that accept their severe prognosis accurately. Appropriate care and support for such patients are warranted from diagnosis over time.

Significance Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants are of concern, with the P.1 variants dominating in Brazil. Brazil is now seeing a record number of deaths. Here, we report that the pathogenicity in hamsters of a P.1 variant is similar to that of nonvariant SARS-CoV-2. However, it has an expanded host range as shown by its replication in mice. Prior infection with nonvariant SARS-CoV-2 strains efficiently prevented replication of the P.1 variant in the lower respiratory tract of hamsters upon reinfection. Convalescent sera from patients infected with nonvariants or sera from messenger RNA vaccinees showed comparable neutralization titers among the P.1 and previously circulating strains. These results suggest that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines based on the original SARS-CoV-2 will provide some protection against P.1 infection., The spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) plays a key role in viral infectivity. It is also the major antigen stimulating the host's protective immune response, specifically, the production of neutralizing antibodies. Recently, a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 possessing multiple mutations in the S protein, designated P.1, emerged in Brazil. Here, we characterized a P.1 variant isolated in Japan by using Syrian hamsters, a well-established small animal model for the study of SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19). In hamsters, the variant showed replicative abilities and pathogenicity similar to those of early and contemporary strains (i.e., SARS-CoV-2 bearing aspartic acid [D] or glycine [G] at position 614 of the S protein). Sera and/or plasma from convalescent patients and BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccinees showed comparable neutralization titers across the P.1 variant, S-614D, and S-614G strains. In contrast, the S-614D and S-614G strains were less well recognized than the P.1 variant by serum from a P.1-infected patient. Prior infection with S-614D or S-614G strains efficiently prevented the replication of the P.1 variant in the lower respiratory tract of hamsters upon reinfection. In addition, passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies to hamsters infected with the P.1 variant or the S-614G strain led to reduced virus replication in the lower respiratory tract. However, the effect was less pronounced against the P.1 variant than the S-614G strain. These findings suggest that the P.1 variant may be somewhat antigenically different from the early and contemporary strains of SARS-CoV-2.

Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based tumor profiling identified an overwhelming number of uncharacterized somatic mutations, also known as variants of unknown significance (VUS). The therapeutic significance of EGFR mutations outside mutational hotspots, consisting of >50 types, in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is largely unknown. In fact, our pan-nation screening of NSCLC without hotspot EGFR mutations (n = 3, 779) revealed that the majority (>90%) of cases with rare EGFR mutations, accounting for 5.5% of the cohort subjects, did not receive EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a first-line treatment. To tackle this problem, we applied a molecular dynamics simulation-based model to predict the sensitivity of rare EGFR mutants to EGFR-TKIs. The model successfully predicted the diverse in vitro and in vivo sensitivities of exon 20 insertion mutants, including a singleton, to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI (R2 = 0.72, P = 0.0037). Additionally, our model showed a higher consistency with experimentally obtained sensitivity data than other prediction approaches, indicating its robustness in analyzing complex cancer mutations. Thus, the in silico prediction model will be a powerful tool in precision medicine for NSCLC patients carrying rare EGFR mutations in the clinical setting. Here, we propose an insight to overcome mutation diversity in lung cancer., LC-SCRUM-Japanで構築した日本最大のがん臨床ゲノムデータを活用しスーパーコンピュータで治療薬の効き目を予測 --がんゲノム医療における新たなツールの開発--. 京都大学プレスリリース. 2019-05-13.

Summary Background Resistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis. Methods In this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB–IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. Findings Between June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0–15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2–21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1–15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417–0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Interpretation The results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting. Funding Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Identification of targetable fusions as oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer has transformed its diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm. In a recent article in Nature, Izumi et al. report the discovery of CLIP1-LTK fusion as a novel oncogenic driver in lung cancer, targetable using the ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor lorlatinib.

To elucidate the host genetic loci affecting severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, or Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is an emerging issue in the face of the current devastating pandemic. Here, we report a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of COVID-19 in a Japanese population led by the Japan COVID-19 Task Force, as one of the initial discovery GWAS studies performed on a non-European population. Enrolling a total of 2,393 cases and 3,289 controls, we not only replicated previously reported COVID-19 risk variants (e.g., LZTFL1, FOXP4, ABO, and IFNAR2), but also found a variant on 5p35 (rs60200309-A at DOCK2) that was significantly associated with severe COVID-19 in younger (-8 (odds ratio = 2.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.58-2.55). This risk allele was prevalent in East Asians, including Japanese (minor allele frequency [MAF] = 0.097), but rarely found in Europeans. Cross-population Mendelian randomization analysis made a causal inference of a number of complex human traits on COVID-19. In particular, obesity had a significant impact on severe COVID-19. The presence of the population-specific risk allele underscores the need of non-European studies of COVID-19 host genetics.

Background: In NEJ026, a phase III trial comparing bevacizumab plus erlotinib (BE) to erlotinib alone (E) for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we demonstrated that the progression-free survival (PFS) of BE was significantly superior to E. Here, we report the results from the analysis of final overall survival (OS) time from enrolment to progressive disease during second-line treatment (PFS2), and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Chemotherapy-naive advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive either erlotinib 150 mg/day plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib alone. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for OS and PFS2 using a stratified log-rank test. QoL was assessed by determining the period that elapsed between enrolment to confirmation of a minimally important difference (MID) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. Findings: The 224 patients were assigned to BE (n=112) and E (n=112). For the OS analysis, the data cut-off date was 30 November 2019. Median follow up time was 39·2 months. Median OS was 50·7 months (95% CI 37·3–not reached) with BE and 46·2 months (95% CI 38·2–not reached) with E (hazard ratio 1·007; 95% CI 0·681–1·490). The median PFS2 was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·1–35·9) with BE and 24·3 months (95% CI 20·4–29·1) with E (hazard ratio, 0·795; 95% CI 0·578–1·094). Median time between enrolment and confirmation of MID was 6·0 months (95% CI 5·2–11·3) with BE and 8·3 months (95% CI 5·7–13·9) with E. Interpretation: In NEJ026, both BE and E were associated with prolonged OS, but addition of bevacizumab to the erlotinib regimen was not beneficial. Trial Registration: The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069. Funding Statement: Chugai Pharmaceutical. Declaration of Interests: TF reports personal fees from Chugai Pharma., during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Astrazeneca, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. HS reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from MSD, personal fees from Novartis Pharma, outside the submitted work. NF reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Chugai, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Taiho, personal fees from Kyowa Kirin, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. SS reports personal fees from Chugai Pharma, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Eli Lilly and Company, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, personal fees from Yakult Honsha, outside the submitted work. SI reports grants and personal fees from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., personal fees from MSD K.K, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K., personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED., outside the submitted work. OY reports personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, outside the submitted work. MO reports grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., during the conduct of the study. MS reports grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical., during the conduct of the study. KA reports personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from MSD Oncology, personal fees from Bristorl Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. YuT reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd, personal fees from AstraZeneca Co Ltd, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co Ltd, outside the submitted work. YF reports personal fees from Liliy, personal fees from Chugai Pharma, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, outside the submitted work. SW reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Chugai Pharma, personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Bristol-Myers, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. KH reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, grants and personal fees from Ono Pharma, personal fees from Boehringer-ingelheim, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Kyorin pharmaceutical, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants from MSD, outside the submitted work. In addition, KH has a patent EGFR mutation test licensed to LSI medience. SM reports personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K, personal fees from MSD K.K, personal fees from Pfizer Japan Inc, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., outside the submitted work. KK reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Company, outside the submitted work. MMa reports grants and personal fees from chugai pharm., during the conduct of the study; personal fees from chugai pharm., personal fees from astrazeneca, personal fees from boehringer ingelheim, personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. YK, KW, YoT, KY, IN, FK, HN, GA, MMi, and TN declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The study was done in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of the Non-Profit Organization MINS Institutional Review Board and by the local institutional review boards of the participating institutions. Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)-based tests are widely used to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As a result that these tests cannot be done in local clinics where RT-qPCR testing capability is lacking, rapid antigen tests (RATs) for COVID-19 based on lateral flow immunoassays are used for rapid diagnosis. However, their sensitivity compared with each other and with RT-qPCR and infectious virus isolation has not been examined. Here, we compared the sensitivity among four RATs by using severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) isolates and several types of COVID-19 patient specimens and compared their sensitivity with that of RT-qPCR and infectious virus isolation. Although the RATs read the samples containing large amounts of virus as positive, even the most sensitive RAT read the samples containing small amounts of virus as negative. Moreover, all RATs tested failed to detect viral antigens in several specimens from which the virus was isolated. The current RATs will likely miss some COVID-19 patients who are shedding infectious SARS-CoV-2.

Background To develop an effective vaccine against a novel viral pathogen, it is important to understand the longitudinal antibody responses against its first infection. Here we performed a longitudinal study of antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients. Methods Sequential blood samples were collected from 39 individuals at various timepoints between 0 and 154 days after onset. IgG or IgM titers to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the S protein, the ectodomain of the S protein, and the N protein were determined by using an ELISA. Neutralizing antibody titers were measured by using a plaque reduction assay. Findings The IgG titers to the RBD of the S protein, the ectodomain of the S protein, and the N protein peaked at about 20 days after onset, gradually decreased thereafter, and were maintained for several months after onset. Extrapolation modeling analysis suggested that the IgG antibodies were maintained for this amount of time because the rate of reduction slowed after 30 days post-onset. IgM titers to the RBD decreased rapidly and disappeared in some individuals after 90 days post-onset. All patients, except one, possessed neutralizing antibodies against authentic SARS-CoV-2, which they retained at 90 days after onset. The highest antibody titers in patients with severe infections were higher than those in patients with mild or moderate infections, but the decrease in antibody titer in the severe infection cohort was more remarkable than that in the mild or moderate infection cohort. Interpretation Although the number of patients is limited, our results show that the antibody response against the first SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic patients is typical of that observed in an acute viral infection. Funding The Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

SARS-CoV-2–induced human antibody repertoire in patients with COVID-19 reveals immune markers of disease severity and recovery., Limited knowledge exists on immune markers associated with disease severity or recovery in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we elucidated longitudinal evolution of SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire in patients with acute COVID-19. Differential kinetics was observed for immunoglobulin M (IgM)/IgG/IgA epitope diversity, antibody binding, and affinity maturation in “severe” versus “mild” COVID-19 patients. IgG profile demonstrated immunodominant antigenic sequences encompassing fusion peptide and receptor binding domain (RBD) in patients with mild COVID-19 who recovered early compared with “fatal” COVID-19 patients. In patients with severe COVID-19, high-titer IgA were observed, primarily against RBD, especially in patients who succumbed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patients with mild COVID-19 showed marked increase in antibody affinity maturation to prefusion SARS-CoV-2 spike that associated with faster recovery from COVID-19. This study revealed antibody markers associated with disease severity and resolution of clinical disease that could inform development and evaluation of effective immune-based countermeasures against COVID-19.

Background Inhaled medicines are key drugs for the treatment of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the variety of inhaler devices and complicated inhalation procedures have created confusion among patients, affecting their correct understanding of inhalation. Recent studies reported that up to 80% of patients made technical errors in inhalation and emphasized the necessity for patient education. Objective We aimed to assess the importance of inhalation-related instructions and to find clinical factors associated with improvements in the inhalation technique. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at a regional core hospital in Japan. Physicians and community pharmacists constructed an interactive instruction system and shared a common inhalation procedure manual. Patients who received instructions for the inhalation technique at least 3 times were recruited. Results A total of 125 patients were analyzed in this study. The median age was 73 years (interquartile range, 67-80 years). At the second visit, 67 patients (53.6%) failed to correctly perform the technique despite being guided at the first visit. At the third visit, 48.8% of patients made some errors. After excluding 40 patients who were not subjected to analysis, the remaining 85 were divided into "improvement" and "no-improvement" groups. The total improvement rate was 57.6%. The median time interval between consecutive instructions in the "improvement" groups was 84 days, whereas that in the "no-improvement" group was 128 days (p < 0.05, U test). No significant difference in the age, sex, or primary disease was seen between these groups. Conclusion Repetitive instructions at shorter intervals may be helpful for patients to develop and maintain an improved inhalation technique.

Background Prognostic understanding in advanced cancer patients and their caregivers may have an impact on the delivery of effective care. The aims of this study were to explore prognostic understanding at diagnosis in both patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers and to investigate correlates of their understanding. Subjects, Materials, and Methods A total of 193 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their 167 caregivers were enrolled at 16 hospitals in Japan. We assessed their perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy and examined their associations with their sociodemographic characteristics, clinical status, quality of life, mood symptoms, and the status of disclosure of information by their treating physicians. Results One fifth of patients and caregivers (21.7% and 17.6%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the patients’ cancer was “completely curable.” Substantial proportions of them (16.9% and 10.3%, respectively) mistakenly believed that the primary goal of therapy was to remove all the cancer. Levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers were significantly higher among those who had accurate understanding of prognosis. In multivariate analyses, inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with sex, better emotional well-being, and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Caregivers’ inaccurate perceptions of patients’ prognoses were associated with better performance status and better emotional well-being of patients. Conclusion Substantial proportions of advanced lung cancer patients and their caregivers misunderstood their prognosis. Interventions to improve their accurate prognostic understanding should be developed with careful attention paid to its associated factors. Implications for Practice This study demonstrated that substantial proportions of patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and their caregivers had misunderstandings about their prognosis. Accurate perceptions of prognosis, which are indispensable in the delivery of effective care, were associated with elevated levels of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers, warranting psychosocial care and support for them immediately after diagnosis. Inaccurate perceptions of prognosis in patients were associated with better emotional well-being and lower lung cancer-specific symptom burden. Illness understanding in caregivers was associated with patients’ physical and mental status. Those findings provide insight into how they obtain accurate illness understanding.

Rationale: Up to 40% of smokers develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) over a period that spans decades. Despite the importance of COPD, much remains to be learned about susceptibility and pathogenesis, especially during early, prediagnostic stages of disease. Airway basal progenitor cells are crucial for lung health and resilience because of their ability to repair injured airways. In COPD, the normal airway epithelium is replaced with increased basal and secretory (mucous) cells and decreased ciliated cells, suggesting that progenitors are impaired. Objectives: To examine airway basal progenitor cells and lung function in smokers with and without COPD. Methods: Bronchial biopsies taken from smokers at risk for COPD and lung cancer were used to acquire airway basal progenitor cells. They were evaluated for count, self-renewal, and multipotentiality (ability to differentiate to basal, mucous, and ciliated cells), and progenitor count was examined for its relationship with lung function. Measurements and Main Results: Basal progenitor count, self-renewal, and multipotentiality were all reduced in COPD versus non-COPD. COPD progenitors produced an epithelium with increased basal and mucous cells and decreased ciliated cells, replicating the COPD phenotype. Progenitor depletion correlated with lung function and identified a subset of subjects without COPD with lung function that was midway between non-COPD with high progenitor counts and those with COPD. Conclusions: Basal progenitor dysfunction relates to the histologic and physiologic manifestations of COPD and identifies a subset that may represent an early, prediagnostic stage of COPD, indicating that progenitor exhaustion is involved in COPD pathogenesis.