Search

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) elicit potent cell cycle arrest in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. However, little is known about the mechanisms through which these drugs alter the tumor phenotype that contributes to the immune escape of EGFR-mutant cells. Using EGFR-mutant NSCLC cell lines and tissue samples from patients, we investigated the changes in immune checkpoints expressed in tumor cells following EGFR inhibition. Subsequently, we also analyzed the role of soluble factors from the dying tumor cells in the activation of immune signaling pathways involved in therapy resistance. Upon EGFR-TKI treatment, we found that EGFR-mutant cells upregulated the expression of innate immune checkpoint CD24 in vitro. We then analyzed biopsy samples from six patients who developed resistance to a first-generation EGFR-TKI without the acquired T790M mutation. Immunohistochemistry revealed that levels of tumor CD24 expression were increased upon treatment compared with those from pre-treatment samples. Monocyte-derived macrophages facilitated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis when EGFR-TKI-treated EGFR-mutant cells were incubated with anti-CD24 antibodies in vitro, suggesting that CD24 may be a therapeutical target for EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Moreover, EGFR inhibition accelerated the release of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from dying tumor cells, which activated the type I interferon signaling pathways in human THP-1 monocytes in a stimulator of interferon genes-dependent manner. Our study indicates that EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells fosters a tumor microenvironment associated with immune escape. Thus, CD24 targeted therapy and cfDNA monitoring may contribute to improved treatment outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

PDF file - 343K

PDF file - 1118K, Supplementary Figure 1 (CSC activities of chemoresistant non-CSCs), Supplementary Figure 2 (Pro-inflammatory phenotypes of HCT116-derived chemoresistant CSCs), Supplementary Figure 3 (Chemoresistance drives CSCs to prime M2 macrophages by a cell-autonomous manner), Supplementary Figure 4 (The role of CSC-R on MDSC differentiation), Supplementary Figure 5 (The role of CD44+CD133+colon CSC-R-derived IRF5 on priming M2 macrophages), Supplementary Figure 6 (Monocytes primed by M-CSF from CSC-R are responsible ofr triggering CSC activities).

Short hydration is a method to change partial intravenous hydration to oral to administer cisplatin (CDDP); however, the most suitable form of oral hydration is unknown. This study aimed to determine whether oral rehydration solution (ORS) affects CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) and electrolyte imbalance.Lung cancer patients (n=200) who had received CDDP-including regimens (CDDP dosage ≥75 mg/mCIN occurred in 9.8% of ORS patients, and 7.5% of non-ORS patients (p=0.79). The variation in serum creatinine level was also similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that ORS intake does not affect CIN, although CIN was associated with the coadministration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The variations in serum electrolyte levels did not differ, and incidence of hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and hypochloremia was also similar between the groups. Moreover, patients in ORS group experienced significantly more anorexia compared to controls, and approximately 40% of the patients were unable to continue ORS intake.ORS intake in CDDP short hydration regimens does not affect CIN and CDDP-induced electrolyte imbalance; however, its intake is associated with the incidence of anorexia suggesting that ORS should not be used for oral hydration.

Introduction: Karyopherin alpha 2 (KPNA2) and karyopherin beta 1 (KPNB1) constitute nuclear transport protein complexes involved in nuclear import and are significant in tumor progression. Although high KPNA2 expression was associated with poor prognosis in solid tumors, the relationship between KPNA2 and KPNB1 expression and their prognostic role in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was used to correlate the expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 with various features, including clinicopathological characteristics in 130 patients with GC and survival in 94 patients with invasive lesions extending to the submucosa or deeper. Results: High expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 was found in 25% and 36% of the patients, respectively. Both were significantly related to tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and Ki-67 expression. KPNA2 expression was significantly related to that of KPNB1 (p < 0.001). Patients with high KPNB1 expression had poorer prognosis than those with low expression (p = 0.027), as was also observed in case of KPNA2 (p < 0.001). Patients with high expression of both KPNA2 and KPNB1 accounted for 18% and had a poorer prognosis than those with high expression of either and those with low expression of both (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that high expression of both KPNA2 and KPNB1 was an independent prognostic factor in patients with GC (hazard ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.64–2.73, p = 0.001). Conclusion: KPNA2 expression was correlated with KPNB1 expression, and high co-expression of KPNA2 and KPNB1 may represent a strong prognostic biomarker in GC.

Naturally occurring in citrus fruits, citric acid is categorized as a weak organic acid, which may exist both as a monohydrate or in an anhydrous form. In biochemistry, this organic acid acts as an intermediate in an essential metabolic process in all aerobic organisms called the Krebs cycle. The literature on citric acid in the context of endodontics up to June 2020 was reviewed using PubMed and MEDLINE. This review aimed to address the antibacterial efficacy of citric acid on endodontic microbiota, its effectiveness on the smear layer, the effects of its toxicity on fracture resistance of dentin, as well as the effectiveness of this acid on the removal of intra-canal medicaments. This report also addressed citric acid-containing endodontic irrigants.

Three years have passed since the reimbursement of cancer genomic medicine, and various issues have become apparent. In these additional remarks, I presented the issues of regional disparity and exit strategies from the standpoint of a core hospital for cancer genomic medicine in Hokkaido. It is crucial to resolve the absence of liaison hospitals in rural areas and to improve access to clinical trials, the main exit point for cancer genome medicine. In addition, I described the individual patient expanded access program in the U. S. as reference information for exit strategies.

About 4 and a half years have passed since"Cancer Genome Medicine"was first mentioned in the Third Phase of the Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control Programs that started in October 2017. Currently, cancer genomic medicine is being carried out by the cancer gene panel test, which is covered by public insurance, mainly at the 12 Cancer Genome Medicine Core Center Hospital designated nationwide by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan. Cancer genomic medicine has come to be positioned as a standard medical treatment. However, there are various challenges in operating an expert panel that professionally examines the results of the gene panel tests and reports treatment recommendations and secondary findings that suggest hereditary tumors. In addition, there is an urgent need to disseminate and educate healthcare professionals and patients about cancer genomic medicine. In this panel discussion on January 14, 2022, 10 panelists discussed how to solve these issues and the prospects for the future.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is being increasingly used for the routine clinical management of solid cancers. In July 2018, the use of tumor tissue‐based CGP assays became available for all solid cancers under the universal health insurance system in Japan. Several restrictions presently exist, such as patient eligibility and limitations on the opportunities to perform such assays. The clinical implementation of CGP based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also expected to raise issues regarding the selection and use of tissue DNA and ctDNA CGP. A Joint Task Force for the Promotion of Cancer Genome Medicine comprised of three Japanese cancer‐related societies has formulated a policy proposal for the appropriate use of plasma CGP (in Japanese), available at https://www.jca.gr.jp/researcher/topics/2021/files/20210120.pdf, http://www.jsco.or.jp/jpn/user_data/upload/File/20210120.pdf, and https://www.jsmo.or.jp/file/dl/newsj/2765.pdf. Based on these recommendations, the working group has summarized the respective advantages and cautions regarding the use of tissue DNA CGP and ctDNA CGP with reference to the advice of a multidisciplinary expert panel, the preferred use of plasma specimens over tissue, and multiple ctDNA testing. These recommendations have been prepared to maximize the benefits of performing CGP assays and might be applicable in other countries and regions.

Eribulin is an effective chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. However, severe adverse effects (SAEs) occur in 30-40% of the patients, and significantly reduce the patients' quality of life and disturb the recommended treatment schedules. Neutropenia is the main cause of treatment suspension, delay, and/or dose reductions, also leading to relative dose intensity reduction. This study aimed to examine the risk factors for SAE occurrence after eribulin treatment.Eighty patients with metastatic breast cancer or advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma who received eribulin were retrospectively evaluated. Risk factors for SAE occurrence in the first cycle were primarily assessed. In addition, factors associated with SAE occurrence during all treatment cycles were evaluated.SAEs in the first cycle occurred in 45% of patients. The primary SAE was neutropenia (91.7%). The incidence of SAEs during all treatment cycles was 61.3%. Multivariate analyses suggested that lower baseline neutrophil and hemoglobin levels were risk factors for SAE occurrence and severe neutropenia incidence in the first cycle. An independent factor associated with SAE occurrence during all cycles was age ≥65 years and a tendency was confirmed for baseline anemia.Baseline neutropenia and anemia were risk factors for SAE occurrence during the first eribulin treatment cycle. Age ≥65 years was also associated with SAE occurrence during all treatment cycles. Patients with these risk factors should be carefully monitored for assessment and prophylaxis.

The Hokkaido medical personnel training plan connecting humans and medicine aims to train"Medical personnel for genome medicine"," Medical personnel for rare cancer and childhood cancer", and"Medical personnel who promote cancer measures according to patient's life stage". We have worked on preparing medical professionals who undergo training courses not only in the graduate school but also in the community medicine centers cooperating with central medical centers in Hokkaido. Furthermore, we have been committed to training medical staff who provide comprehensive healthcare for patients with cancer cross-regionally, cross-sectionally, and tumor-agnostically and researchers who can pursue genome medicine. The evaluation committee concluded that the plan was substantially advanced according to the evaluation guideline, and a committee member commented that the information through Web was assessable during the COVID-19 pandemic; in fact, it should be ensured by everyone. Based on these comments, we continuously work to develop human resources using content and information dissemination know-how accumulated in the Hokkaido medical personnel training plan.

Background To promote precision oncology in clinical practice, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology, and the Japanese Cancer Association, jointly published “Clinical practice guidance for next-generation sequencing in cancer diagnosis and treatment” in 2017. Since new information on cancer genomic medicine has emerged since the 1st edition of the guidance was released, including reimbursement for NGS-based multiplex gene panel tests in 2019, the guidance revision was made. Methods A working group was organized with 33 researchers from cancer genomic medicine designated core hospitals and other academic institutions. For an impartial evaluation of the draft version, eight committee members from each society conducted an external evaluation. Public comments were also made on the draft. The finalized Japanese version was published on the websites of the three societies in March 2020. Results The revised edition consists of two parts: an explanation of the cancer genomic profiling test (General Discussion) and clinical questions (CQs) that are of concern in clinical practice. Particularly, patient selection should be based on the expectation that the patient's post-test general condition and organ function will be able to tolerate drug therapy, and the optimal timing of test should be considered in consideration of subsequent treatment plans, not limited to treatment lines. Conclusion We expect that the revised version will be used by healthcare professionals and will also need to be continually reviewed in line with future developments in cancer genome medicine.

Purpose Gefitinib is one of the standard treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. It has been reported that acid suppressants (AS) decrease the anti-tumor effect of gefitinib by reducing its solubility. AS is sometimes necessary in cancer patients; however, previous reports have not shown the most compatible AS with gefitinib administration in cancer patients. This study was conducted to determine if histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) can affect the anti-tumor efficacy of gefitinib. Methods Eighty-seven patients with NSCLC who were administered gefitinib were retrospectively investigated. Patients who were co-administered H2RA were compared with non-AS control patients. H2RA was administered once a day at about 3-5 or 8-12 h after gefitinib intake. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse effects. Results Median PFS in H2RA group and control group was 8.0 months and 9.0 months, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.82). The incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly less in patients administered H2RA, whereas there were no differences between the two groups with regard to skin toxicity and diarrhea. Multivariate analysis suggested that H2RA co-administration is not a risk factor for worse PFS and OS (hazard ratio of 0.95, 0.86; 95% confidence interval of 0.60-1.48, 0.52-1.43;p = 0.82 and 0.60, respectively). Conclusion This study demonstrated that concomitant administration of H2RA with gefitinib does not affect the efficacy of gefitinib.

The standard of care for first-line treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) in patients who cannot tolerate platinum-based regimens has not been clarified. We aimed to develop a new treatment regimen for patients with R/M SCCHN who are ineligible for platinum-based therapy, by evaluating the effects and safety of tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and cetuximab. Platinum-ineligibility was defined as: elderly (aged ≥ 75 years), poor PS, comorbidity, platinum resistance and refusal to undergo platinum-based therapy. Patients received S-1 (80 mg/m2/day for 14 days followed by a seven-day break) and cetuximab (initial dose, 400 mg/m2, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Between September 2014 and September 2018, we enrolled 23 patients. Among the 21 patients who were evaluable, 20 were male [median age, 69 years (range 49–82)]. The ORR was 9 (43%) of 21 patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 22–66]. One and eight patients achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.0–18.3) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.1–8.2). Grade 3/4 adverse events included acneiform rash and skin reactions (33%), hypomagnesemia (19%), hand-foot syndrome (14%), fatigue (14%), mucositis (10%), and anorexia (10%). Combination treatment with S-1 and cetuximab was effective and tolerated well by patients with platinum-ineligible R/M SCCHN. Registered clinical trial number: UMIN000015123

Purpose We evaluated the expression of proteasome subunits to assess whether the proteasome could be a therapeutic target in cisplatin-resistant lung cancer cells. Methods Cisplatin-resistant (CR) variants were established from three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (A549, H1299, and H1975) and two small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines (SBC3 and SBC5). The expression of proteasome subunits, the sensitivity to immunoproteasome inhibitors, and 20S proteasomal proteolytic activity were examined in the CR variants of the lung cancer cell lines. Results All five CR cell lines highly expressed one or both of the immunoproteasome subunit genes, PSMB8 and PSMB9, while no clear trend was observed in the expression of constitutive proteasome subunits. The CR cells expressed significantly higher levels of PSMB8 and PSMB9 proteins, as well. The CR variants of the H1299 and SBC3 cell lines were more sensitive to immunoproteasome inhibitors, and had significantly more proteasomal proteolytic activity than their parental counterparts. Conclusions The immunoproteasome may be an effective therapeutic target in a subset of CR lung cancers. Proteasomal proteolytic activity may be a predictive marker for the efficacy of immunoproteasome inhibitors in cisplatin-resistant SCLC and NSCLC.

Microorganisms are very important in the initiation of pulpo-periapical pathosis. Due to the complexity of the root canal system, the mechanical instrumentation of the root canal system should be supplemented with proper canal irrigants and medicaments. It has been revealed that due to the interactions of canal irrigants and medicaments with dentin and contents of the canal system, the antimicrobial effect of canal irrigants and medicaments in canal (ex vivo) are different from that in vitro. Furthermore, root canal irrigants may decrease the fracture resistance of dentin. The purpose of this paper was to review the data on the interactions between root canal irrigants/medicaments and dentin/root canal contents.

Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) inhibitors are broadly active against distinct types of cancer, including nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous studies have addressed the effect of BET-inhibiting drugs on the expression of oncogenes such as c-Myc, but DNA damage repair pathways have also been reported to be involved in the efficacy of these drugs. AZD1775, an inhibitor of the G2-M cell cycle checkpoint kinase WEE1, induces DNA damage by promoting premature mitotic entry. Thus, we hypothesized that BET inhibition would increase AZD1775-induced cytotoxicity by impairing DNA damage repair. Here, we demonstrate that combined inhibition of BET and WEE1 synergistically suppresses NSCLC growth both in vitro and in vivo. Two BET inhibitors, JQ1 and AZD5153, increased and prolonged AZD1775-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and concomitantly repressed genes related to nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), including XRCC4 and SHLD1. Furthermore, pharmaceutical inhibition of BET or knockdown of the BET protein BRD4 markedly diminished NHEJ activity, and the BET-inhibitor treatment also repressed myelin transcription factor 1 (MYT1) expression and promoted mitotic entry with subsequent mitotic catastrophe when combined with WEE1 inhibition. Our findings reveal that BET proteins, predominantly BRD4, play an essential role in DSB repair through the NHEJ pathway, and further suggest that combined inhibition of BET and WEE1 could serve as a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC.

In June 2019, the Japanese National Health Insurance (NHI) system introduced coverage for two types of tumor genomic profiling (TGP): FoundationOne

Paclitaxel (PTX)-associated acute pain syndrome (P-APS) is characterized by disabling but transient arthralgia and myalgia in up to 80% of patients administered with PTX. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely administered to patients with cancer who have pain or fever, and are mainly used to manage P-APS. In this study, we investigated how P-APS appear in the patients who were administered NSAIDs prior to PTX injection. The incidence or severity and duration of P-APS in patients previously administered NSAIDs were compared to those of patients who were not administered NSAIDs. The relationship between previously administered NSAIDs and rescue administration for the relief of P-APS was also evaluated. It was revealed that the incidence and duration of P-APS were 72% and 4.67 +/- 2.30 d, respectively, in the control group and 84% and 6.19 +/- 3.30 d, respectively, in the NSAIDs group. There was no significant difference in the incidence and duration and the severity of P-APS between the two groups. Patients who were previously administered NSAIDs tended to obtain less pain relief from NSAIDs administered as rescue medications, and needed other medication. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed no correlation between previously administered NSAIDs or patient characteristics and the incidence of P-APS. In this study, it was found that clinical condition that needs NSAIDs and previously administered NSAIDs prior to PTX injection do not affect the incidence, severity, and duration of P-APS. These results will help in educating patients about their medications and will contribute to the management of P-APS.

ImportanceQuality assurance of molecular tumor boards (MTBs) is crucial in cancer genome medicine.ObjectiveTo evaluate the concordance of recommendations by MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations at all 12 leading institutions for cancer genomic medicine in Japan using 50 simulated cases.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a prospective quality improvement study of 50 simulated cancer cases. Molecular tumor boards from 12 core hospitals independently recommended treatment for 50 cases blinded to the centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. The study’s central committee consisted of representatives from all 12 core hospitals in Japan who selected the 50 simulated cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas database, including frequently observed genomic alterations. The central committee recommended centrally developed consensus treatment. The concordance rate for genomically matched treatments between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was evaluated. Data analysis was conducted from January 22 to March 3, 2021.ExposuresSimulated cases of cancer.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was concordance, defined as the proportion of recommendations by MTBs concordant with centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations. A mixed-effects logistic regression model, adjusted for institutes as a random intercept, was applied. High evidence levels were defined as established biomarkers for which the treatment was ready for routine use in clinical practice, and low evidence levels were defined as biomarkers for genomically matched treatment that were under investigation.ResultsThe Clinical Practice Guidance for Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (edition 2.1) was used for evidence-level definition. The mean concordance between MTBs and centrally developed consensus treatment recommendations was 62% (95% CI, 57%-65%). Each MTB concordance varied from 48% to 86%. The concordance rate was higher in the subset of patients with colorectal cancer (100%; 95% CI, 94.0%-100%), ROS1 fusion (100%; 95% CI, 85.5%-100%), and high evidence level A/R (A: 88%; 95% CI, 81.8%-93.0%; R:100%; 95% CI, 92.6%-100%). Conversely, the concordance rate was lower in cases of cervical cancer (11%; 95% CI, 3.1%-26.1%), TP53 mutation (16%; 95% CI, 12.5%-19.9%), and low evidence level C/D/E (C: 30%; 95% CI, 24.7%-35.9%; D: 25%; 95% CI, 5.5%-57.2%; and E: 18%; 95% CI, 13.8%-23.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that evidence level (high [A/R] vs low [C/D/E]: odds ratio, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.8-10.8) and TP53 alteration (yes vs no: odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.10) were significantly associated with concordance.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this study suggest that genomically matched treatment recommendations differ among MTBs, particularly in genomic alterations with low evidence levels wherein treatment is being investigated. Sharing information on matched therapy for low evidence levels may be needed to improve the quality of MTBs.

Hokkaido University Hospital has been designated as a Core Hospital for Cancer Genomic Medicine and developed a system to provide cancer genomic medicine in Hokkaido with its liaison hospitals. Since being reimbursed in June 2019, comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) testing showed certain therapeutic efficacy in patients with no standard treatment options, but it also revealed some problems such as the small number of patients who can receive therapeutic drugs matched with gene abnormalities. Since candidate drugs are often unapproved or off-label, it is necessary to smoothly introduce clinical trials, advanced medical treatment system, and patient-proposed health care service. At our hospital, we are focusing on sharing information on clinical trials being conducted in Hokkaido, launching investigator-initiated clinical trials, promoting patient-proposed health care service, promoting a registry study of genetic profiling and targeted therapies in patients with rare cancers and accompanying clinical trials, and incorporating pediatric cancer patients. This paper describes Hokkaido's cancer genomic medicine provision system, including its exit strategy, and the human resource development that serve as its foundation.