Search

Aims: To evaluate the effects of adding glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue therapy to insulin on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, insulin dosage, treatment satisfaction, and risk of hypoglycaemia. Methods: Type 2 diabetes patients with insulin therapy receiving a GLP-1 analogue at 4 Swedish centers were studied. Hypoglycemia was evaluated using glucometers and patient self-report. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) was used to evaluate treatment satisfaction. Results: Among 65 patients studied, 4 discontinued therapy, none due to hypoglycemia, and there were no suspected severe adverse events. Among 61 patients who remained on therapy over a mean of 7.0 months, 40 were treated with liraglutide and 21 with exenatide. HbA1c decreased from a mean of 8.9% (82.4 mmol/mol) to 7.9% (71.9 mmol/mol) (p < 0.001), weight decreased from 111.1 kg to 104.0 kg (p

Aim: To compare effects of early insulin vs. glibenclamide treatment on beta-cell function, metabolic control and quality of life (QL) in recently diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Forty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes diagnosed 0-2 years before inclusion were randomized to two daily injections of premixed 30% soluble and 70% NPH insulin or glibenclamide at six diabetic clinics in Sweden. C-peptide-glucagon tests were performed yearly after 3 days of withdrawal of treatment. Results: Thirty-four patients completed 4 years of study. Daily dose of insulin was increased from 20.4 +/- 1.8 U at year 1 to 26.1 +/- 2.9 U at year 4 (p = 0.005). Glibenclamide dosage increased from 2.7 +/- 0.4 mg at year 1 to 4.5 +/- 0.8 mg at year 4 (p = 0.02). Weight increased more in insulin than in glibenclamide treated (+4.4 +/- 0.8 vs. +0.3 +/- 1.0 kg, p < 0.005). Following short-term withdrawal of treatment, the C-peptide responses to glucagon were significantly higher in the insulin vs. glibenclamide group at years 1 (p < 0.01) and 2 (p < 0.02). HbA1c improved identical during the first year but thereafter deteriorated in the glibenclamide group (p < 0.005 for difference at year 4). Ratios of proinsulin to insulin were higher during treatment in glibenclamide- vs. insulin-treated patients after year 2. QL after 4 years as measured by the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) form was not significantly altered. Conclusions: In a 4-year perspective, beta-cell function deteriorated in both groups. However, deterioration occurred faster in the glibenclamide group, indicating that alleviating demands on secretion by insulin treatment is beneficial. (Less)

BACKGROUND: Early insulin treatment is considered more beneficial than anti-diabetic medication with sulphonylureas, because the latter may exert negative effects on beta-cell function, while the former may help preserve it. In a previous study, we found that C-peptide response was increased in the insulin-treated group, whereas it was decreased in the glibenclamide group. However, it was not certain whether the advantage remained in the longer term. AIM: In this study, we tested whether early insulin treatment is more beneficial than glibenclamide against a 6-year follow-up perspective. METHODS: We designed a randomized clinical trial in subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Glucagon stimulatory tests, measuring C-peptide and islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP), were performed after 2, and 3, days of temporary insulin and glibenclamide withdrawal. RESULTS: 18 subjects initially randomized to glibenclamide, and 16 randomized to two daily injections of insulin, participated in end-of-study investigations. C-peptide response to glucagon deteriorated (p < 0.01 vs. baseline) in initially glibenclamide-treated patients (n = 18), but not in insulin-treated patients (p < 0.05 for difference between groups, after 2 days of treatment withdrawal). The IAPP response to glucagon declined in the glibenclamide group (p < 0.001), but not in insulin-treated subjects (p = 0.05 for difference between groups). CONCLUSIONS: Early insulin treatment preserves beta-cell secretory function better than glibenclamide even in a 6-year perspective.

OBJECTIVE—To evaluate whether treatment with insulin in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes is advantageous compared with glibenclamide treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—β-Cell function, glycemic control, and quality of life were monitored over 2 years in 39 patients with islet cell antibody-negative type 2 diabetes diagnosed 0–2 years before inclusion in a Swedish multicenter randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomized to either two daily injections of premixed 30% soluble and 70% NPH insulin or glibenclamide (3.5–10.5 mg daily). C-peptide-glucagon tests were performed yearly in duplicate after 2–3 days of temporary withdrawal of treatment. RESULTS—After 1 year the glucagon-stimulated C-peptide response was increased in the insulin-treated group by 0.14 ± 0.08 nmol/l, whereas it was decreased by 0.12 ± 0.08 nmol/l in the glibenclamide group, P < 0.02 for difference between groups. After 2 years, fasting insulin levels were higher after treatment withdrawal in the insulin-treated versus the glibenclamide-treated group (P = 0.02). HbA1c levels decreased significantly during the first year in both groups; however, at the end of the second year, HbA1c had deteriorated in the glibenclamide group (P < 0.01), but not in the insulin-treated group. The difference in evolution of HbA1c during the second year was significant between groups, P < 0.02. A questionnaire indicated no difference in well-being related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS—Early insulin versus glibenclamide treatment in type 2 diabetes temporarily prolongs endogenous insulin secretion and promotes better metabolic control.

Patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) have traditionally been described as having increased insulin sensitivity with a tendency toward fasting hypoglycemia, at least in children. In other studies, impaired glucose tolerance has been found. To evaluate basal insulin sensitivity, a hyperinsulinemic, normoglycemic clamp was performed with an insulin rate of 40 mU/m2/min after an overnight fast. Fifteen patients (four women and 11 men aged 20 to 62 years) with GHD for at least 1 year were compared with 15 healthy controls matched for sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Thirteen patients had complete pituitary deficiency and were being treated with conventional hormone replacement therapy. Two men had isolated GHD since childhood. Four men were being treated with bromocriptin. There were no significant differences between fasting blood glucose (4.4 +/- 0.1 v 4.7 +/- 0.2 [mean +/- SEM] mmol/L) or fasting plasma insulin (9.5 +/- 1.4 v 8.8 +/- 1.1 mU/L) in patients and controls, respectively. Fasting free fatty acid (FFA) levels were lower in patients (444 +/- 35 v 796 +/- 94 mumol/L, P < .01). Blood glucose levels during the clamp were similar (4.6 +/- 0.1 v 4.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/L), as were insulin levels (81 +/- 4 v 93 +/- 4 mU/L). A decrease in glucose infusion rate (GIR) was seen during the clamp in GHD subjects (3.9 +/- 0.5 v 9.9 +/- 0.7 mg/kg body weight/min) as compared with controls (P = .001). Even if corrections were made for body fat, there was a significant difference (GIR corrected per lean body mass, 5.8 +/- 0.8 v 13.9 +/- 0.9 mg/kg lean body mass/min, P < .001). The results suggest that adults with GHD are insulin-resistant. Despite this finding, normal fasting plasma insulin levels were seen.