1. An analysis of power relations in flood disaster resilience in Rivers State, Nigeria
- Author
-
Brown, Ibama and Flannery, Wesley
- Abstract
Climate change-related disasters have, in recent years become, a global phenomenon with catastrophic consequences. Africa, in particular, has suffered the consequences of climate related disasters, resulting in monumental urban and rural flooding, wide spread casualties, population displacement and property loss. Given the long-term implications of climate change, it is critically important to understand how African nations will respond to the challenges of flooding. Rural and urban flooding occasioned by climate change has over the years become a constant natural disaster in most of the vulnerable Nigerian cities. A case in point was the 2012 flood episode where many coastal areas of Nigeria suffered from flooding, with minimal preparedness and little respite. The impact of the flooding was felt more in some low lying communities with minimal resilience capacities situated along the coastal fringes in the Niger Delta region especially the Orashi region. Orashi region comprises of four local government areas; Abua/Odual, Ahoada East, Ahoada West and Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni with increasingly vulnerable communities to the consequences of flooding. However, in spite of their vulnerability some people displayed resilience capacities more than others because of their apparent access to resources and power. Such access has created differentials in their resilience capacities which this research aims to ascertain. The aim of the research is to investigate how power, and access to power, produces differentials in flood disaster resilience in Rivers State, Nigeria. The specific objectives are; construct an appropriate theoretical framework for the study; analyse the relationship between habitus and the resilience capacities in socially and politically different case study sites; and synthesize case study findings to illustrate how power was employed and accessed during flooding episodes. The research draws on the Bourdieusian theory of practice and uses the analytical concepts of field, habitus, and species of capital to understand how various forms of power was employed within the case study sites to capture resources. The study area was subdivided into four case study sites, based on administrative and tribal boundaries. Each case study consisted of semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Data analysis consisted of thematic analysis and undertaken using the Nvivo software. Findings indicate that most of the vulnerable population displayed some ingrained dispositions deploying indigenous knowledge and social capital as their adaptations to survive the flood. Besides, their dispositions were influenced by unflinching tribal affiliations leading to the emergence of tribal capital. The case study site with the greatest amount of resources such as financial capital from oil and gas resources, displayed the most conflict, with actors deploying political capital and symbolic violence to capture resources. This development made such people more vulnerable with the least resilience capacities during the flood episode. The study concludes that as an original study in the Orashi region the Bourdieusian lens is appropriate; it highlights why vulnerable people display specific ingrained dispositions during a disaster, and why access to power and resources among vulnerable populations does not build disaster resilience. The study recommends further studies regarding; effective spatial planning and reorientation towards the use of land and access to capital of the vulnerable population regarding inimical traditional practices, carry out further studies to build on this before drawing informed conclusions in order to properly understand the rationale behind their ingrained dispositions.
- Published
- 2019