Search

The adoption of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes has given a major push to the formation of Three Rs initiatives in the form of centres and platforms. These centres and platforms are dedicated to the so-called Three Rs, which are the Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal use in experiments. ATLA’s 50th Anniversary year has seen the publication of two articles on European Three Rs centres and platforms. The first of these was about the progressive rise in their numbers and about their founding history; this second part focuses on their current status and activities. This article takes a closer look at their financial and organisational structures, describes their Three Rs focus and core activities (dissemination, education, implementation, scientific quality/translatability, ethics), and presents their areas of responsibility and projects in detail. This overview of the work and diverse structures of the Three Rs centres and platforms is not only intended to bring them closer to the reader, but also to provide role models and show examples of how such Three Rs centres and platforms could be made sustainable. The Three Rs centres and platforms are very important focal points and play an immense role as facilitators of Directive 2010/63/EU ‘on the ground’ in their respective countries. They are also invaluable for the wide dissemination of information and for promoting the implementation of the Three Rs in general.

Public awareness and discussion about animal experiments and replacement methods has greatly increased in recent years. The term ‘the Three Rs’, which stands for the Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal experiments, is inseparably linked in this context. A common goal within the Three Rs scientific community is to develop predictive non-animal models and to better integrate all available data from in vitro, in silico and omics technologies into regulatory decision-making processes regarding, for example, the toxicity of chemicals, drugs or food ingredients. In addition, it is a general concern to implement (human) non-animal methods in basic research. Toward these efforts, there has been an ever-increasing number of Three Rs centres and platforms established over recent years — not only to develop novel methods, but also to disseminate knowledge and help to implement the Three Rs principles in policies and education. The adoption of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes gave a strong impetus to the creation of Three Rs initiatives, in the form of centres and platforms. As the first of a series of papers, this article gives an overview of the European Three Rs centres and platforms, and their historical development. The subsequent articles, to be published over the course of ATLA’s 50th Anniversary year, will summarise the current focus and tasks as well as the future and the plans of the Three Rs centres and platforms. The Three Rs centres and platforms are very important points of contact and play an immense role in their respective countries as ‘on the ground’ facilitators of Directive 2010/63/EU. They are also invaluable for the widespread dissemination of information and for promoting implementation of the Three Rs in general.

The use of head fixation in mice is increasingly common in research, its use having initially been restricted to the field of sensory neuroscience. Head restraint has often been combined with fluid control, rather than food restriction, to motivate behaviour, but this too is now in use for both restrained and non-restrained animals. Despite this, there is little guidance on how best to employ these techniques to optimise both scientific outcomes and animal welfare. This article summarises current practices and provides recommendations to improve animal wellbeing and data quality, based on a survey of the community, literature reviews, and the expert opinion and practical experience of an international working group convened by the UK's National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs). Topics covered include head fixation surgery and post-operative care, habituation to restraint, and the use of fluid/food control to motivate performance. We also discuss some recent developments that may offer alternative ways to collect data from large numbers of behavioural trials without the need for restraint. The aim is to provide support for researchers at all levels, animal care staff, and ethics committees to refine procedures and practices in line with the refinement principle of the 3Rs.

Complex I (NADH-ubiquinone reductase) and Complex III (ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase) supplemented with NADH generated O

Animal testing has long been integral to the development of biologicals, including vaccines. The use of animals can provide important information on potential toxicity, insights into their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, physiologic distribution, and potency. However, the use of these same methods is often adopted into the post-licensure phase of the product life cycle for the monitoring of product qualities, such as potency or safety, as part of their routine batch release. The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are collaborating on a project to review animal-based testing methods described in WHO manuals, guidelines and recommendations for biologicals to identify where updates can lead to a more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal tests) in batch release testing requirements. An international working group consisting of more than 30 representatives from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, national control laboratories and regulatory bodies is performing this review. This project aims to address concerns about inconsistencies in the guidance for the scientifically justified use of animal methods required for the post-licensure quality control and batch release testing of biologicals, and the near absence of recommendations for the application of 3Rs principles within the relevant guidelines. Improved adoption of 3Rs principles and non-animal testing strategies will help to reduce the delays and costs associated with product release testing and help support faster access to products by the global communities who need them most urgently.

Depression is the world's predominant mental health problem and a leading cause of disability. Neuropharmacological research has not yet advanced treatments to sufficiently meet clinical need, largely due to the failure of animal models to predict clinical efficacy. The forced swim test (FST) has been extensively used in the field of antidepressant research but has been under scrutiny due to its perceived severity to animals. Any use of animals in experiments and testing must have a scientific or regulatory purpose and researchers need to ensure that there is no scientifically valid alternative. However, regulatory requirements have been incorrectly cited as a reason to support the use of the FST. More research is required on tests that do not involve stressing animals as replacements for the FST. Non-behavioural neurochemical measures might provide a means to advance neuropharmacological developments while reducing animal suffering. For example, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be promising.

Progress is being made in the development and application of methods to replace, reduce and refine the use of non-human primates (NHPs) in biomedical research and testing of products and devices. However, there remain considerable cultural and practical barriers to widespread uptake of available 3Rs techniques and to further advancement of the 3Rs in NHP research, over and above scientific obstacles. While most of these barriers apply also to the use of other vertebrate species, there is arguably a greater imperative to overcome them in the case of the NHPs, given their high sentience and the degree of societal concern about their use. To do so will require greater awareness among researchers of the availability and scientific benefits of 3Rs approaches; increased funding for the development of new research models and tools, infrastructure and training; more robust scientific and ethical review of research proposals involving NHPs; better retrospective evaluation of the benefits accrued from NHP research; and improved knowledge transfer. Change is not made without inconvenience, but fully applying the 3Rs to research involving NHPs can improve the quality of science, its translation, business efficiency and public support.

Biosimilars are biological medicinal products that contain a version of the active substance of an already authorised original biological medicinal product (the innovator or reference product). The first approved biosimilar medicines were small proteins, and more recently biosimilar versions of innovator monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have entered development as patents on these more complex proteins expire. In September 2013, the first biosimilar mAb, infliximab, was authorised in Europe. In March 2015, the first biosimilar (Zarxio™, filgrastim-sndz, Sandoz) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration; however, to date no mAb biosimilars have been approved in the US. There are currently major differences between how biosimilars are regulated in different parts of the world, leading to substantial variability in the amount of in vivo nonclinical toxicity testing required to support clinical development and marketing of biosimilars. There are approximately 30 national and international guidelines on biosimilar development and this number is growing. The European Union's guidance describes an approach that enables biosimilars to enter clinical trials based on robust in vitro data alone; in contrast, the World Health Organization's guidance is interpreted globally to mean in vivo toxicity studies are mandatory. We reviewed our own experience working in the global regulatory environment, surveyed current practice, determined drivers for nonclinical in vivo studies with biosimilar mAbs and shared data on practice and study design for 25 marketed and as yet unmarketed biosimilar mAbs that have been in development in the past 5y. These data showed a variety of nonclinical in vivo approaches, and also demonstrated the practical challenges faced in obtaining regulatory approval for clinical trials based on in vitro data alone. The majority of reasons for carrying out nonclinical in vivo studies were not based on scientific rationale, and therefore the authors have made recommendations for a data-driven approach to the toxicological assessment of mAb biosimilars that minimises unnecessary use of animals and can be used across all regions of the world.

Acute inhalation studies are conducted in animals as part of chemical hazard identification and for classification and labelling. Current methods employ death as an endpoint (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline (TG) 403 and TG436) while the recently approved fixed concentration procedure (FCP) (OECD TG433) uses fewer animals and replaces lethality as an endpoint with evident toxicity. Evident toxicity is the presence of clinical signs that predict that exposure to the next highest concentration will cause severe toxicity or death in most animals. Approval of TG433 was the result of an international initiative, led by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), which collected data from six laboratories on clinical signs recorded for inhalation studies on 172 substances. This paper summarises previously published data and describes the additional analyses of the dataset that were essential for approval of the TG.

The current animal-based paradigm for safety assessment must change. In September 2016, the UK National Centre for Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) brought together scientists from regulatory authorities, academia and industry to review progress in bringing new methodology into regulatory use, and to identify ways to expedite progress. Progress has been slow. Science is advancing to make this possible but changes are necessary. The new paradigm should allow new methodology to be adopted once it is developed rather than being based on a fixed set of studies. Regulatory authorities can help by developing Performance-Based Standards. The most pressing need is in repeat dose toxicology, although setting standards will be more complex than in areas such as sensitization. Performance standards should be aimed directly at human safety, not at reproducing the results of animal studies. Regulatory authorities can also aid progress towards the acceptance of non-animal based methodology by promoting "safe-haven" trials where traditional and new methodology data can be submitted in parallel to build up experience in the new methods. Industry can play its part in the acceptance of new methodology, by contributing to the setting of performance standards and by actively contributing to "safe-haven" trials.

Most in vivo models of ischaemic stroke target the middle cerebral artery and a spectrum of stroke severities, from mild to substantial, can be achieved. This review describes opportunities to improve the in vivo modelling of ischaemic stroke and animal welfare. It provides a number of recommendations to minimise the level of severity in the most common rodent models of middle cerebral artery occlusion, while sustaining or improving the scientific outcomes. The recommendations cover basic requirements pre-surgery, selecting the most appropriate anaesthetic and analgesic regimen, as well as intraoperative and post-operative care. The aim is to provide support for researchers and animal care staff to refine their procedures and practices, and implement small incremental changes to improve the welfare of the animals used and to answer the scientific question under investigation. All recommendations are recapitulated in a summary poster (see supplementary information)., The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Meetings of the working group were funded by the NC3Rs. Dr. Michael J. O Neill is a full time employee of Eli Lilly & Co.

An international expert group which includes 30 organisations (pharmaceutical companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) has shared data on the use of recovery animals in the assessment of pharmaceutical safety for early development. These data have been used as an evidence-base to make recommendations on the inclusion of recovery animals in toxicology studies to achieve scientific objectives, while reducing animal use.Recovery animals are used in pharmaceutical development to provide information on the potential for a toxic effect to translate into long-term human risk. They are included on toxicology studies to assess whether effects observed during dosing persist or reverse once treatment ends.The group devised a questionnaire to collect information on the use of recovery animals in general regulatory toxicology studies to support first-in-human studies. Questions focused on study design, the rationale behind inclusion or exclusion and the impact this had on internal and regulatory decisions. Data on 137 compounds (including 53 biologicals and 78 small molecules) from 259 studies showed wide variation in where, when and why recovery animals were included. An analysis of individual study and programme design shows that there are opportunities to reduce the use of recovery animals without impacting drug development.

Different government agencies operating in the European Union regulate different types of chemical products but all require testing for carcinogenicity to support applications for product marketing and commercialisation. A conference was held in Brussels in 2013 where representatives of the pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection industries, together with representatives of regulatory agencies, universities and other stakeholders, met under the auspices of The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) to discuss the varying requirements for carcinogenicity testing, and how these studies might be refined to improve hazard evaluation and risk assessment while implementing principles of the 3Rs (replacement, refinement and reduction in animal studies). While there are some similarities, the regulatory approaches in pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection sectors have varying degrees of flexibility in requirements for carcinogenicity testing, to an extent reflecting concerns over the magnitude and duration of human exposure, either directly as in therapeutic exposure to pharmaceuticals, or indirectly through the ingestion of residues of veterinary drugs or plant protection chemicals. The article discusses these differences and other considerations for modified carcinogenicity testing paradigms on the basis of scientific and 3Rs approaches.

This article reviews current data on the use of cognition enhancers as study aids in the student population. It identifies gaps and uncertainties in the knowledge required to make a balanced assessment of the need for some form of regulation. The review highlights the weak evidence on the prevalence of use of such drugs, especially outside the US, and the ambiguous evidence for their efficacy in a healthy population. Risks are well documented for the commonly used drugs, but poorly appreciated by users. These include not only the side-effects of the drugs themselves, but risks associated with on-line purchase, which offers no guarantees of authenticity and which for some drugs is illegal. The case for urgent action to regulate use is often linked to the belief that new and more effective drugs are likely to appear in the near future. The evidence for this is weak. However, drugs are not the only possible route to neuroenhancement and action is needed to collect more data on the impact of existing drugs, as well as new technologies, in order to guide society in making a proportionate response to the issue. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.

Animal models of epilepsy and seizures, mostly involving mice and rats, are used to understand the pathophysiology of the different forms of epilepsy and their comorbidities, to identify biomarkers, and to discover new antiepileptic drugs and treatments for comorbidities. Such models represent an important area for application of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement of animal use). This report provides background information and recommendations aimed at minimising pain, suffering and distress in rodent models of epilepsy and seizures in order to improve animal welfare and optimise the quality of studies in this area. The report includes practical guidance on principles of choosing a model, induction procedures, in vivo recordings, perioperative care, welfare assessment, humane endpoints, social housing, environmental enrichment, reporting of studies and data sharing. In addition, some model-specific welfare considerations are discussed, and data gaps and areas for further research are identified. The guidance is based upon a systematic review of the scientific literature, survey of the international epilepsy research community, consultation with veterinarians and animal care and welfare officers, and the expert opinion and practical experience of the members of a Working Group convened by the United Kingdom's National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs).

The changing environment of monoclonal antibody (mAb) development is impacting on the cost of drug development and the use of experimental animals, particularly non-human primates (NHPs). The drive to reduce these costs is huge and involves rethinking and improving nonclinical studies to make them more efficient and more predictive of man. While NHP use might be unavoidable in many cases because of the exquisite specificity and consequent species selectivity of mAbs, our increasing knowledge base can be used to improve drug development and maximise the output of experimental data. Data on GLP regulatory toxicology studies for 58mAbs were obtained from 10 companies across a wide range of therapeutic indications. These data have been used to investigate current practice and identify study designs that minimise NHP use. Our analysis shows that there is variation in the number of animals used for similar studies. This information has been used to develop practical guidance and make recommendations on the use of science-based rationale to design studies using fewer animals taking into account the current regulatory guidance. There are eight recommendations intended to highlight areas for consideration. They include guidance on the main group size, the inclusion of recovery groups and the number of dose groups used in short and long term chronic toxicology studies.

Psychiatric and neurological diseases combined represent a considerable social and economic burden in Europe. A recent study conducted by the European Brain Council (EBC) quantified the 'cost and burden' of major brain diseases in Europe, amounting to €386bn per year. Considering that these costs will increase exponentially in the years to come due to ageing of the European population, it is necessary to act now in order to curb this increase and possibly reverse the trend. Thus, establishing a strong European platform supporting basic and clinical research in neuroscience is needed to confront the economic and social challenge posed by management of brain diseases in European countries. To setup a platform for discussion, EBC published in 2006 a Consensus Document on European Brain Research, describing needs and achievements of research in Europe and presenting proposals for future research programs. Since 2006, European research in neuroscience has advanced tremendously. The present document represents an update elaborated to reflect changes in research priorities and advances in brain research that have taken place since 2006. The same approach and format have been used here as in the previous version. Multinational and multidisciplinary teams have once again come together to express their views, not only on the current strengths in European research, but also on what needs to be done in priority, hoping that this update will inspire policy makers and stakeholders in directing funding for research in Europe.

It has been predicted that the use of non-human primates (NHPs) is going to increase considerably in the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Opportunities exist to focus on a rigorous, science-based approach to drug development, however, which will minimize this increase. In this article, the authors review current and future NHP use in mAb development based on surveys, experience and expert opinion and propose a framework that will minimize future NHP use and continue to support science and innovation.

Acute inhalation studies are conducted in animals as part of chemical hazard identification and characterisation, including for classification and labelling purposes. Current accepted methods use death as an endpoint (OECD TG403 and TG436), whereas the fixed concentration procedure (FCP) (draft OECD TG433) uses fewer animals and replaces lethality as an endpoint with ‘evident toxicity.’ Evident toxicity is defined as clear signs of toxicity that predict exposure to the next highest concentration will cause severe toxicity or death in most animals. A global initiative including 20 organisations, led by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has shared data on the clinical signs recorded during acute inhalation studies for 172 substances (primarily dusts or mists) with the aim of making evident toxicity more objective and transferable between laboratories. Pairs of studies (5 male or 5 female rats) with at least a two-fold change in concentration were analysed to determine if there are any signs at the lower dose that could have predicted severe toxicity or death at the higher concentration. The results show that signs such as body weight loss (>10% pre-dosing weight), irregular respiration, tremors and hypoactivity, seen at least once in at least one animal after the day of dosing are highly predictive (positive predictive value > 90%) of severe toxicity or death at the next highest concentration. The working group has used these data to propose changes to TG433 that incorporate a clear indication of the clinical signs that define evident toxicity.

A 45 Ca 2+ influx assay has been used to investigate the pharmacology of stably expressed recombinant human NR1a/NR2A and NR1a/NR2B N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Inhibition of glutamate-stimulated 45 Ca 2+ influx by six glycine-site antagonists and inhibition of glycine-stimulated 45 Ca 2+ influx by five glutamate-site antagonists revealed no significant differences between affinity values obtained for NR1a/NR2A and NR1a/NR2B receptors. The polyamine site agonist spermine showed differential modulation of glutamate- and glycine-stimulated 45 Ca 2+ influx for recombinant NMDA receptors, inhibiting and stimulating 45 Ca 2+ influx into cells expressing NR1a/NR2A receptors (IC 50 = 408 μM) and NR1a/NR2B receptors (EC 50 = 37.3 μM), respectively. The antagonist ifenprodil was selective for NR1a/NR2B receptors (IC 50 = 0.099 μM) compared with NR1a/NR2A receptors (IC 50 = 164 μM). The effects of putative polyamine site antagonists, redox agents, ethanol, and Mg 2+ and Zn 2+ ions were also compared between NR1a/NR2A and NR1a/NR2B receptors. This study demonstrates the use of 45 Ca 2+ influx as a method for investigating the pharmacology of the numerous modulatory sites that regulate the function of recombinant human NMDA receptors stably expressed in L(tk-) cells.

Transfection of mouse L(tk-) cells with human N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit cDNAs under the control of a dexamethasone-inducible promoter has been used to generate two stable cell lines expressing NR1a/NR2A receptors and a stable cell line expressing NR1a/NR2B receptors. The cell lines have been characterised by northern and western blot analyses, and the pharmacology of the recombinant receptors determined by radioligand binding techniques. Pharmacological differences were identified between the two NMDA receptor subtypes. The glutamate site antagonist D, L-(epsilon)-2-[3H]amino-4-propyl-5-phosphono-3-pentanoic acid ([3H]CGP 39653) had high affinity for NR1a/NR2A receptors (KD = 3.93 nM) but did not bind to NR1a/NR2B receptors. Glycine site agonists showed a 2.6-5.4-fold higher affinity for NR1a/NR2B receptors. Data from radioligand binding studies indicated that one of the cell lines, NR1a/NR2A-I, expressed a stoichiometric excess of the NR1a subunit, which may exist as homomeric assemblies. This observation has implications when interpreting data from pharmacological analysis of recombinant receptors, as well as understanding the assembly and control of expression of native NMDA receptors.

5-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(1-(4-chlorobenzyl)piperidin-4-yl)pyrazole (3) was identified from screening of the Merck sample collection as a human dopamine D4 (hD4) receptor ligand with moderate affinity (61 nM) and 4-fold selectivity over human D2 (hD2) receptors. Four separate parts of the molecule have been examined systematically to explore structure-activity relationships with respect to hD4 affinity and selectivity over other dopamine receptors. It was found that the 4-chlorophenyl group attached to the pyrazole is optimal, as is the 4-substituted piperidine. The lipophilic group on the basic nitrogen is more amenable to change, with the optimal group found to be a phenethyl. The aromatic heterocyle can be altered to a number of different groups, with isoxazoles and pyrimidines showing improved affinities. This heterocycle can also be advantageously alkylated, improving the selectivity of the compounds over D2 receptors. It is hypothesized that the conformation around the bond joining the aromatic heterocycle to the piperidine is important for D4 affinity, based on crystal structures of isoxazoles (29 and 30) and on a conformationally constrained compound (28). Putting all the favorable changes together led to the discovery that 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-(1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl)iso xazole (36) is a nanomolar antagonist at human dopamine D4 receptors with500-fold selectivity over hD2 and200-fold selectivity over hD3. Compound 36 is an antagonist of hD4 receptors with good oral bioavailability of 38%, a half life of 2 h, and brain levels 10-fold higher than plasma levels.

Since inhibition of myo-inositol monophosphatase (EC 3.1.3.25) by lithium ions and the resulting attenuation of phosphatidylinositol cycle activity may be the mechanism by which lithium exerts its therapeutic effect in the treatment of manic depression, it is of great interest to understand the mechanism of the enzyme and how lithium and other metals interact with it. Divalent magnesium is essential for enzyme activity, whereas Li+ and high concentrations of Mg2+ act as uncompetitive inhibitors with respect to substrate. From the recently solved crystal structure of the human enzyme, several amino acid residues in the active site were targeted for mutagenesis studies. Nine single-residue substituted mutants were characterized with regard to catalytic parameters, Mg2+ dependence, and Li+ inhibition. In addition, a terbium fluorescence assay was developed to determine the metal binding properties of the wild-type and mutant enzymes. Although none of these mutations affected Km for substrate substantially, the mutations Glu70--Gln, Glu70--Asp, Asp90--Asn and Thr95--Ala, in which residues within coordinating distance of the active site metal were modified, all resulted in large reductions in catalytic activity. The position of Glu70 in the crystal structure further suggests that this residue may be involved in activating water for nucleophilic attack on the substrate. The mutations Lys36--Ile, Asp90--Asn, Thr95--Ala, Thr95--Ser, His217--Gln, and Cys218--Ala all resulted in parallel reductions in both lithium and magnesium affinity, suggesting that Li+ and Mg2+ share a common binding site.

1. The effects of lithium on [3H]-inositol and [3H]-cytidine incorporation into [3H]-inositol monophosphates ([3H]-InsP1) and [3H]-cytidine monophosphorylphosphatidate ([3H]-CMP-PA), respectively, and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) and inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (InsP4) mass were studied in carbachol-stimulated human m1 muscarinic receptor-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells (m1 CHO cells). 2. Lithium alone (10 mM) had no appreciable effects on any of the four parameters measured; it was only in carbachol-stimulated cells that the effects of lithium became apparent. 3. In the presence of carbachol (1 mM), lithium (10 mM) caused a relatively rapid (within 5 min) accumulation of [3H]-InsP1 and [3H]-CMP-PA which continued up to about 20-30 min, after which accumulation slowed down. On the other hand, the elevation in InsP3 and InsP4 levels produced by carbachol was not altered by lithium in the short-term and only at later times (> 20-30 min) was the response attenuated, with InsP3 and InsP4 levels approaching basal. 4. The effects of lithium on carbachol-stimulated [3H]-InsP1 and [3H]-CMP-PA accumulation and the attenuation of the carbachol-induced elevation of InsP3 and InsP4 were all dose-dependent, with EC50s in the region of 1 mM. 5. The lithium-induced effects on [3H]-CMP-PA and InsP3 and InsP4 in carbachol-stimulated cells could be reversed, in a dose-dependent manner, by preincubation with exogenous myo-inositol (EC50 = 2-3 mM) but not by the inactive analogue scyllo-inositol, indicating that these effects occur as a consequence of depletion of inositol. 6. The temporal effects of lithium are consistent with lithium inhibiting inositol monophosphatase,causing accumulation of InsP1, resulting in lower free inositol levels. This leads to accumulation of CMP-PA and reduced PI synthesis which, once agonist-linked membrane inositol phospholipids are depleted, produces attenuated InsP3 and InsP4 responses.7. These results in ml CHO cells support the hypothesis that lithium affects the PI cycle cell signalling pathway by depletion of inositol due to inhibition of inositol monophosphatase.

We have previously described the synthesis of bisphosphonate-containing inhibitors of inositol monophosphatase. In the present study, a more detailed examination of the in vitro and in vivo properties of one of these compounds, L-690,330, is described. L-690,330 is a competitive inhibitor of inositol monophosphatase with a Ki, depending on the source of IMPase, of between 0.2 and 2 microM. Although approximately 1,000-fold more potent in vitro than lithium, in muscarinic ml receptor-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells prelabelled with [3H]inositol, L-690,330 only produced 40% of the accumulation of [3H]inositol monophosphates achieved by lithium at the same concentration (10 mM), suggesting that the ability of L-690,330 to cross the cell membrane is limited. Nevertheless, under conditions of cholinergic stimulation (100 mg/kg of pilocarpine s.c.), high doses of L-690,330 were able to increase brain inositol(l)phosphate levels in vivo to three- to fourfold control levels. This effect was dose dependent (ED50 = 0.3 mmol/kg s.c.) and was maximal after 1 h. In peripheral tissues, the effects of L-690,330 on inositol(l)phosphate levels mimicked those of lithium both qualitatively and quantitatively. However, in the brain, the effects of L-690,330 were much less than seen with lithium, consistent with the blood-brain barrier restricting access of the polar L-690,330 into the CNS, thereby further limiting entry of compound into cells in the brain. In the future, it may be possible to develop prodrugs of this compound, which circumvent many of the cell permeability problems inherent in bisphosphonate compounds.

An anion-exchange HPLC mass assay was used to characterize Swiss-Webster mouse brain and peripheral tissue inositol(1)phosphate [Ins(1)P] levels. Ins(1)P was identified in all tissues studied but Ins(4)P could be identified only in brain, and then only as a part of a peak containing an additional, unidentified component. As a result, it was not possible to quantify Ins(4)P levels. Following a single subcutaneous dose of lithium (10 mmol/kg), brain Ins(1)P levels were maximally elevated after 6 h (corresponding to peak brain lithium concentrations) and were increased to levels 35- and 20-fold higher than in saline-treated animals in cholinergic agonist (pilocarpine)-stimulated and unstimulated animals, respectively. The ED50 for the lithium-induced accumulation of brain Ins(1)P 6 h after administration was 4–6 mmol/kg. The pilocarpine stimulation of lithium-induced brain Ins(1)P accumulation had an ED50 of 22 mg/kg, with maximal accumulation occurring 120 min after pilocarpine administration. Atropine reduced Ins(1)P levels, in both the absence and the presence of lithium, by 40%, indicating that cholinergic systems contribute a large (40%) component of basal brain phosphatidylinositol (PI) cycle activity. In peripheral tissues, there were lithium-induced accumulations of Ins(1)P in kidney, heart, and liver (but not testes) but these were less than that seen in the brain, suggesting that under basal (and pilocarpine-stimulated) conditions, the brain has a higher turnover of the PI cycle than the various peripheral tissues studied. These data support the hypothesis that lithium exerts its effects in vivo via modulation of the PI cycle. In addition, the susceptibility of brain rather than peripheral tissue to the pharmacological effects of lithium may be a consequence of higher PI cycle turnover in brain.

The unique cytoplasmic loop regions of the alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3, and alpha 5 subunits of the GABAA receptor were expressed in bacterial and used to produce subunit-specific polyclonal antisera. Antibodies immobilized on protein A-Sepharose were used to isolate naturally occurring alpha-specific populations of GABAA receptors from rat brain that retained the ability to bind [3H]muscimol, [3H]flunitrazepam, [3H]Ro15-1788, and [125I]iodo-clonazepam with high affinity. Pharmacological characterization of these subtypes revealed marked differences between the isolated receptor populations and was generally in agreement with the reported pharmacological profiles of GABAA receptors in cells transiently transfected with alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2, alpha 2 beta 1 gamma 2, alpha 3 beta 1 gamma 2, and alpha 5 beta 1 gamma 2 combinations of subunits. Additional subtypes were also identified that bind [3H]muscimol but do not bind benzodiazepines with high affinity. The majority of GABAA receptor oligomers contains only a single type of alpha subunit, and we conclude that alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3, and alpha 5 subunits exist in vivo in combination with the beta subunit and gamma 2 subunit.

The ability of lithium to exert profound and selective psychopharmacological effects to ameliorate manic-depressive psychosis has been the focus of considerable research effort. There is increasing evidence that lithium exerts its therapeutic action by interfering with polyphosphoinositide metabolism in brain and prevention of inositol recycling by an uncompetitive inhibition of inositol monophosphatase. Stefan Nahorski, Ian Ragan and John Challiss discuss this unusual stimulus-dependent form of enzyme inhibition, emphasizing that the selectivity exhibited by lithium depends upon the degree of inositol lipid hydrolysis and polyphosphoinositide dephosphorylation.

Selecting a pharmacologically relevant animal species for testing the safety and toxicity of novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies to support clinical testing can be challenging. Frequently, the species of choice is the primate. With the increased number of mAbs in the pharmaceutical pipeline, this has significant implications for primate use, and so raises several important scientific, ethical and economic issues. Here, following a recent international workshop held to debate this topic, we discuss issues in the preclinical testing of mAbs, with a particular focus on species relevance and primate use, and provide suggestions for how these issues might be addressed.

Publisher Summary The Foresight project on Brain Science, Addiction and Drugs, finds out the views of the pharmaceutical industry on the use of psychoactive substances in the future. The industry is cautious about the commercial viability of treatments specifically aimed at addiction and has mixed views on the role that vaccines could play in its prevention. The industry is also much concerned about the ethics of preventative treatments. Nevertheless, there is optimism that drugs to enhance executive function, decrease impulsivity, and reduce stress and craving are being discovered anyway, whether specifically aimed at addiction or not. These could form part of a treatment regimen that combines the identification of at-risk groups, pharmacological and psychological treatments to reduce craving and prevent relapse, while simultaneously addressing comorbid conditions. Optimism about new treatments for neuropathic, inflammatory, and functional pain is being driven by a better understanding of central sensitization mechanisms and the role of inflammatory factors as well as by confidence in drugs now in their early stages of development.

Brain disease psychiatric and neurologic disease combined represents a considerable social and economic burden in Europe. Data collected by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest that brain diseases are responsible for 35% of Europe's total disease burden. An analysis of all health economic studies of brain diseases in Europe, published by the European Brain Council (EBC) in June 2005, estimated the total cost of brain disease in Europe in 2004 to be Euro 386 billion. That burden is set to grow, mainly due to the fact that the European population is ageing. Investment in brain sciences does not match that burden now, let alone in the future. Brain research received only 8% of the life science budget in the European Commission's Fifth Framework Programme, which represents less than 0.01% of the annual cost of brain disorders for that period. Over the last decade, Europe has been losing ground to the USA and Japan in terms of both basic and clinical research. Many of Europe's young researchers are taking up posts in the USA and staying there. Big pharmaceutical companies are fleeing Europe for the USA, taking their drug development programmes with them. Research in the brain sciences now holds the promise of therapies that halt and even reverse neurodegeneration, of better diagnostic tools, neural prostheses for the paralysed and drugs for depression and anxiety that are tailored to the individual, thereby eliminating or reducing side effects. Our growing understanding of the normal brain could lead to better prevention of brain disease and to more effective teaching methods. The need for innovative treatments has never been greater, and Europe boasts clusters of excellent researchers in biotechnology who could collaborate with brain scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to realise this promise. But if Europe is to seize these opportunities and meet the challenge of brain disease, it needs to go forward on the basis of greater collaboration between countries, greater collaboration between industry, academia and patient organisations, and increased investment in the brain sciences. The EBC was formed in 2002 to bring together scientists, clinicians, the pharmaceutical industry, charities and patient organisations from all over Europe to campaign for these goals. It takes a novel, bottom-up approach to research policy, and in developing this consensus document, it aims to promote a greater and more focused effort in this area, to improve public understanding of the brain sciences and above all, to support brain research as a priority under the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7, 2007-2013). The research programme outlined here was first conceived by the EBC board. An outline was sent to all member organisations and a number of individual experts for comments. Following that, a table of contents was developed. The 45 research themes were written by groups of experts from across Europe who represent a wide range of disciplines. Each one contains a proposal for future research on a specific brain-related theme which the EBC believes could form the basis of one or more integrated projects or strategic targeted research projects (STREP) funded under FP7. The EBC has deliberately focused on the major diseases and then described the basic research needed to understand and treat or perhaps even cure those diseases. The programme is therefore constructed "from man to molecule" and not the other way round, with equal importance attached to basic and clinical research. The EBC suggests that each of the proposed integrated projects or STREP should be awarded a budget in the order of Euro 10 to 15 million. In addition, brain research should be treated as an important element of many other parts of FP7, such as the European Research Council and research programmes on information technology and the causes of violence. Any research programme that concerns human behaviour should, by definition, take account of brain research. The EBC envisages that the priority for brain research it proposes at the European level will translate into higher priority for brain research at the national level, and this document may also serve as a starting point for the development of national consensus programmes. It seems likely that consensus conferences on brain research in Europe may further develop the themes and ideas discussed here. An EBC task force may also be established to further the consensus process. In general, increasing funding in the brain sciences would bring enormous economic returns by lightening the burden on healthcare systems and increasing the productivity of affected individuals-and might easily pay for itself. The human and social returns of such an investment are inestimable. And the time to act is now.

In the retina, activation of dopamine receptors, particularly the D2-like family (D2, D3, D4 receptor subtypes), with quinpirole suppresses the light sensitive cAMP pool and inhibits melatonin synthesis in photoreceptor cells. We have characterised rat retinal D4 receptors using the D4 selective radioligand [(125)I] L-750667 which bound specifically and saturably to rat retinal membranes with high affinity (K(d) 0.06+/-0.02 nM) and exhibited a D4 receptor pharmacology. Comparison of the binding kinetics of [(125)I] L-750667 and [(3)H] spiperone revealed B(max) values of 134+/-27 fmol/mg and 219+/-47 fmol/mg respectively, indicating that the dopamine D4 receptor is a major component of D2-like dopamine receptors in the rat retina. Modulation of retinal cAMP levels by quinpirole was used to evaluate the functional relevance of rat retinal dopamine D4 receptors. Quinpirole (0.03-3 micro ) produced a dose-related decrease of the light sensitive cAMP pool which was reversed by haloperidol, clozapine and the D4 selective antagonist, L-745870 with a rank order of potency suggesting that the quinpirole effect is due to activation of the dopamine D4 receptors. The D2 selective ligand L-741626 had no effect on the quinpirole response confirming that the D4 receptor is the major receptor subtype mediating dopamine induced suppression of adenylate cyclase in the retina.

5-Hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptors have been identified in the rat brain using the radioligand [3H]Q ICS 205-930. We report here that these sites have been solubilised from membranes prepared from pooled rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus using various detergents. Of the six detergents tested (1% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulphonate, 0.5% deoxycholate, 1% Lubrol, 0.5% digitonin, 1% Triton X-100, and 1% octyl glucoside), deoxycholate (0.5%) yielded the best solubilisation (54.6 +/- 6% of receptor, 70.5 +/- 4% of protein; n = 3). However, most detergents inhibited binding of [3H]Q ICS 205-930 in solution. Binding was found to be optimal after the receptor had been exchanged by gel filtration through Sephadex G-25 into the detergent Lubrol PX (0.05%). Binding of [3H]Q ICS 205-930 to these soluble sites was saturable and specific (Bmax = 46.1 +/- 6 fmol/mg of protein; KD = 0.33 +/- 0.09 nM; n = 4) and was similar to that observed in membranes. Kinetic studies of [3H]Q ICS 205-930 binding demonstrated it to be rapid, with equilibrium being achieved within 15 min at 4 degrees C. The KD determined from the rates of association and dissociation (0.38 nM) agreed well with that determined by saturation analysis. Various antagonists completed for the soluble receptors with a rank order of potency typical for binding at a 5-HT3 receptor site: zacopride (Ki = 0.26 nM) greater than quipazine (0.37 nM) = Q ICS 205-930 (0.33 nM) greater than ICS 205-930 (0.93 nM) greater than GR 38032F (2.2 nM) greater than BRL 24924 (4.1 nM) greater than MDL 72222 (23.4 nM) greater than ketanserin (6,000 nM). The agonists 5-HT and 2-methyl-5-HT also competed for [3H]Q ICS 205-930 binding with high affinity (39.6 and 55.6 nM, respectively). Therefore, we conclude that the 5-HT3 receptor of rat brain has been successfully solubilised, and this should provide a good starting point for purification of the receptor.

As a tool for research on the molecular mechanism of manic depression, it is hard to envisage anything less promising than lithium. Compared with most drugs, it is of very low potency and there are a large number of biochemical processes which could be affected by lithium at therapeutically relevant concentrations (1,2). It is therefore extremely difficult to decide which might be pertinent to its action. Lithium has also remained the most effective treatment for nearly 40 years, attesting to its unique properties and the obvious impossibility of designing more potent, specific, and efficacious analogues through the traditional principles and methodology of drug design. How then are we to approach the problem of the mechanism by which lithium acts? Obviously we must look for likely targets which are modulated by lithium within its therapeutic dose range and from which we can construct a plausible case that this modulation underlies both the antimanic and antidepressant actions of lithium. This is extremely difficult and there is by no means a consensus on the most likely target. This chapter reviews the action of lithium on a target which fulfills the preceding criteria reasonably well, that is, the phosphoinositide cycle. The discussion covers two main issues; first, whether the actions of lithium on thecycle can be explained by inhibition of a single step in the pathway, for example, the inositol monophosphatase enzyme; and second, whether interference with the phosphoinositide cycle provides a convincing explanation for the therapeutic action of lithium.