Search

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd demonstrated compelling single-agent antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative BC (Krop, SABCS 2021). This is the first report of results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−; including HER2-low and HER2-zero) BC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical findings and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with unresectable or metastatic HR+/HER2− BC that progressed on standard therapies. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including ORR (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and DCR (CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of the April 29, 2022, data cutoff, 41 pts had received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 10.9 mo [range, 7-13]); 9 pts were ongoing. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (63%; progressive disease [PD] or clinical progression). Median age was 57 y (range, 33-75); 54% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated (Table) with a median of 5 (range, 3-10) prior regimens in the advanced setting; 95% had prior CDK4/6i (adjuvant/metastatic). Median time from initial treatment for metastatic disease to the first dose of Dato-DXd was 42.7 mo (range, 10.2-131.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) were observed in 98% (any grade) and 41% (grade ≥3) of pts. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (80%, 10%), nausea (56%, 0%), fatigue (46%, 2%), and alopecia (37%, 0%). Serious TEAEs were observed in 6 pts (15%); 1 pt died due to dyspnea, which was not considered to be treatment related. Dose reductions occurred in 5 pts due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), keratitis (n=1), and decreased appetite (n=1) (>1 AE per pt); 14 pts had treatment delayed due to stomatitis (n=8), retinopathy (n=1), dysphagia (n=1), fatigue (n=1), malaise (n=1), COVID-19 (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), urinary tract infection (n=1), decreased lymphocyte count (n=1), and nasal congestion (n=1; >1 AE per pt). Three pts discontinued treatment due to keratitis (n=1) and pneumonitis (n=2); 1 case of pneumonitis was adjudicated as grade 2 drug-related interstitial lung disease. The ORR was 29% (11 confirmed PRs; 1 pending confirmation), the DCR was 85% (35/41), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 41% (17/41). Conclusions: Dato-DXd demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity, with high disease control in heavily pretreated pts, the majority having received prior CDK4/6i. Based on these findings, the TROPION-Breast01 (NCT05104866) randomized phase 3 study comparing 2L+ Dato-DXd vs investigator’s choice chemotherapy is currently enrolling pts with HR+/HER2− BC. Prior Therapies in the Adjuvant or Metastatic Setting Citation Format: Funda Meric-Bernstam, Ian Krop, Dejan Juric, Takahiro Kogawa, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Toru Mukohara, Takuya Tsunoda, Senthil Damodaran, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Aditya Bardia. PD13-08 Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study Evaluating Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Unresectable or Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2–Negative Breast Cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-08.

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 mAb covalently linked to a highly potent topoisomerase I (Topo I) inhibitor payload via a stable, tumor selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd has previously shown encouraging activity in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC (Krop, SABCS 2021). Here we report updated results from the TROPION-PanTumor01 study in pts with advanced/metastatic TNBC. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, 2-part dose-escalation/expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated pts with solid tumors. Based on previous clinical and exposure-response results from pts with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV Q3W is being evaluated in pts with advanced TNBC that relapsed/progressed on standard therapies; 2 pts received 8 mg/kg prior to selection of 6 mg/kg. The primary objectives were safety and tolerability. Tumor responses, including objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + stable disease [SD]), were assessed per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review. Results: As of April 29, 2022, 44 pts received Dato-DXd (median follow-up, 16.6 mo [range, 13-22]) at the time of data cutoff. The primary cause of treatment discontinuation was disease progression (86%; PD or clinical progression), and 4 pts are still receiving therapy. Median age was 53 y (range, 32-82); 32% had de novo metastatic disease. Pts were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 (range, 1-10) prior regimens in the metastatic setting. Prior treatments included taxanes (91%), anthracyclines (75%), capecitabine (61%), platinum (52%), immunotherapy (43%), Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (32%), and PARPi (18%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; all cause) occurred in 100% (any grade) and 50% (grade ≥3) of pts, respectively. Most common TEAEs (any grade, grade ≥3) were stomatitis (73%, 11%), nausea (66%, 2%), vomiting (39%, 5%), fatigue (34%, 7%), and alopecia (36%, 0%). One pt had grade 3 decreased neutrophil count; no cases of interstitial lung disease (ILD) or grade ≥3 diarrhea were observed. Serious TEAEs were reported in 9 pts (20%); no deaths associated with adverse events (AEs) were observed. Dose reductions occurred in 8 pts (18%) due to stomatitis (n=3), fatigue (n=2), dry eye (n=1), retinal exudates (n=1), and dysgeusia (n=1); 12 pts (27%) delayed treatment due to stomatitis (n=5), dry eye (n=1), keratitis (n=1), blurred vision (n=1), fatigue (n=1), bronchitis (n=1), skin infection (n=1), musculoskeletal chest pain (n=1), dysgeusia (n=1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n=1), and dyspnea (n=1; >1 AE per pt). One pt (2%) discontinued treatment due to grade 1 pneumonitis (which was centrally adjudicated as not ILD). ORR in all pts was 32% (1 CR, 13 PRs), DCR was 80% (35/44), and clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo) was 34% (15/44). Median duration of response was not yet reached; median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-7.3), and median overall survival (mOS) was 12.9 mo (95% CI, 10.1-14.7). In the subset of pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy and with measurable disease at baseline, ORR was 44% (12/27). Among all pts without prior Topo I inhibitor–based ADC therapy (n=30), mPFS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE), and mOS was 14.3 mo (95% CI, 10.5-NE). Conclusions: Dato-DXd continues to demonstrate encouraging and durable antitumor activity, along with a manageable safety profile, in heavily pretreated pts with metastatic TNBC. Based on these findings, the phase 3 randomized TROPION-Breast02 (NCT05374512) trial comparing Dato-DXd vs chemotherapy as 1L therapy for pts with metastatic TNBC is currently underway. Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Ian Krop, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Anthony W. Tolcher, Toru Mukohara, Aaron Lisberg, Toshio Shimizu, Erika Hamilton, Alexander I. Spira, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Hong Zebger-Gong, Yui Kawasaki, Rie Wong, Takahiro Kogawa. Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Updated Results From the Phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-03.

Background: HER2DX is a 27-gene prognostic (risk-score) and predictive (pathological complete response [pCR]-score) assay in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer (BC) based on clinical data and the expression of 4 gene signatures (immune, proliferation, luminal differentiation, and HER2 amplicon). Here we aim to evaluate, for the first time, the ability of HER2DX to predict pCR following neoadjuvant THP in HER2+ BC. Methods: Standardized HER2DX was evaluated centrally on baseline pre-treatment FFPE tumor biopsies from the DAPHNe phase II trial (Waks et al. NPJ Breast 2022; NCT03716180), in which patients (pts) with newly diagnosed stage II-III HER2+ BC were treated with neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel × 12 and HP every 3 weeks × 4. Primary aim was to test the ability of HER2DX pCR-score to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0). Secondary objectives were to test the ability of HER2DX pCR-score to predict pCR independent of clinical-pathological variables and PAM50 subtype (HER2-enriched vs not) and to evaluate the association of HER2DX pCR-score with HER2DX risk-score. Five patients who received additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy after THP were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression and receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed in R code 4.0.5. Results: HER2DX was evaluated in 80 of 97 pts (82.5%) enrolled in the DAPHNe trial who received study treatment. Clinical T2-4 disease represented 81.3% of cases (n=65), clinical node-negative disease (cN0) represented 65.0% of cases (n=52), and 70.0% of tumors (n=56) were hormone receptor-positive. The overall pCR rate was 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.3-70.7): 87.0% (95% CI 79.6-94.4) in hormone receptor-negative disease and 48.2% (95% CI 37.2-59.1) in hormone receptor-positive disease. The proportion of HER2DX low-, medium- and high-pCR groups was 38.8%, 27.5% and 33.7%, respectively. HER2DX pCR-score (as a continuous variable from 0 to 100) was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio [OR]=1.05, p< 0.0001). In the overall population, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, pCR-med and pCR-low groups were 92.6%, 63.6% and 29.0% (pCR-high vs pCR-low OR=30.6, p< 0.0001), respectively. The AUC ROC of HER2DX pCR score (as a continuous variable) and pCR status was 0.835. In the ER-negative population, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, pCR-med and pCR-low groups were 94.7%, 66.7%, and 0%, respectively (Table 1). HER2DX pCR-score was significantly associated with pCR independent of hormone receptor status, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score, clinical stage, and PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype. The correlation between HER2DX pCR-score and HER2DX risk-score was weak (Pearson coefficient=-0.12), as previously described (Prat et al. EBiomedicine 2022). 51.3% of patients were categorized as HER2DX low-risk. Conclusion: The 27-gene HER2DX genomic test predicts pCR following neoadjuvant THP in newly diagnosed stage II-III HER2+ BC. Patients with HER2DX pCR-low score and HER2DX high-risk score, representing 22.5% of pts, warrant further attention in order to optimize therapeutic strategies in this subset. The combination of HER2DX pCR-score and risk-score might guide therapeutic decisions by identifying patients who are ideal candidates for de-escalated or escalated systemic and locoregional treatments. Table 1 Citation Format: Adrienne Waks, Esther R. Ogayo, Laia Paré, Mercedes Marín-Aguilera, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Patricia Galván, Oleguer Castillo, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Ana Vivancos, Patricia Villagrasa, Paolo Tarantino, Neelam Desai, Jennifer Guerriero, Otto Metzger, Nadine Tung, Ian Krop, Joel S Parker, Charles M. Perou, Aleix Prat, Eric Winer, Sara Tolaney, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf. Independent validation of the HER2DX genomic test in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP): a correlative analysis from the DAPHNe phase II clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-05.

Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens has been shown to significantly improve outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer and is being investigated for high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) can stimulate intra-tumoral T cell infiltration and enhance the expression and immune detection of tumor-specific neoantigens. This phase II pilot randomized study (NCT04443348) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of preoperative primary tumor RT boost when combined with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, then followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dual co-primary endpoints include determining the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the non-irradiated and pathologically confirmed metastatic axillary lymph node(s) in each treatment arm and quantifying tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in on-treatment (C1D14) tumor biopsies. We hypothesize that high-dose RT will increase the proportion of tumors with high T cell infiltration (i.e., top quartile) from 25% to 55%. Secondary endpoints include measuring residual cancer burden, evaluating tolerability of the regimen, and assessing quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of treatment-associated changes in the tumor immune microenvironment, circulating immune cell analyses, and circulating tumor DNA kinetics. Methods: The study plans to enroll 128 participants with either triple negative (n=80) or high-risk HR=/HER2- (n=48) breast cancer who will be randomized to receive no, low (9 Gy), or high (24 Gy) dose of preoperative RT boost, after which 24 participants of either breast cancer subtype will be enrolled to an exploratory high dose proton therapy boost cohort. The eligibility criteria include patients who have biopsy-proven, axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer that is either triple negative (defined as ER< 10%, PR< 10%, and HER2-negative) or high-risk HR+/HER2- (grade III or having a high-risk genomic assay score). Study treatment is given in 6-week cycles, with 400 mg Pembrolizumab given on day 1 of each cycle. For those participants randomized to receive a preoperative RT boost, treatment is delivered in 3 fractions (3 × 3 Gy or 3 × 8 Gy) over consecutive business days, where one of the fractions is given on the same day as C1D1 Pembrolizumab. Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy begins on C1D15 with paclitaxel (plus carboplatin for triple negative) administered weekly for 12 weeks, and then starting on C3D15, dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide is administered every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following neoadjuvant treatment, participants will receive standard breast surgery (including removal of the pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph node) followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, radiation therapy, and standard-of-care systemic therapy as clinically indicated. Tissue samples from the primary tumor and biopsy-proven lymph node are taken at baseline, C1D14, and at the time of surgery. There are eleven blood collection timepoints throughout the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Participants will be followed for 2 years after surgery to assess safety and durability of responses. Results: This study has accrued 12 participants to date, including 10 with triple negative breast cancer and 2 with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Formal results for this study are forthcoming, as the trial is actively accruing at 6 institutions, with plans to open at 3 more within the year. For persons with a specific interest in this trial, please contact Joseph Connolly, Multi-Center Coordinator, at jconnolly28@mgh.harvard.edu. Citation Format: Joseph J. Connolly, Laura M. Spring, Alphonse G. Taghian, Michele Gadd, Laura Warren, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Tari King, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Jose P. Leone, Dana L. Casey, Lisa Carey, Tiffany A. Traina, Yara Abdou, Atif Khan, George Plitas, Jean Wright, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Lisa Jacobs, Rachel Blitzblau, E Shelley Hwang, Carey Anders, Ian Krop, Antonio C. Wolff, Alastair M. Thompson, Elyssa Denault, Gaorav Gupta, Alice Ho. TBCRC-053: P-RAD: A Randomized Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab and No, Low or High Dose RADiation in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-15-01.

Background. Patients (pts) with early triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) are at increased risk of breast cancer recurrence and death. Recent studies have focused on escalation of therapy, with current treatment standard of at least five drugs – and associated toxicities - for eTNBC. Though presence of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) as measured by residual cancer burden (RCB) helps guide addition of adjuvant treatment, more effective tools to tailor therapy are limited. Persistence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the setting of residual disease is associated with high risk of distant recurrence. However, more sensitive minimal residual disease (MRD) assays are needed to potentially guide optimization of systemic therapy. Methods. TBCRC 030 is a phase II randomized study of 12 weeks of NAT single agent cisplatin or paclitaxel for stage II-III TNBC, followed by surgery. The primary objective of the parent study was to correlate baseline biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency and RCB by study arm. From this group, responders (RCB 0/1) and non-responders (RCB 2/3) from both study arms who did not receive additional NAT prior to surgery were selected for analysis from the study cohort, matched on baseline nodal status and tumor size. As a post hoc study amendment, available pts were followed for event free survival (EFS). Plasma samples were collected prior to treatment initiation (W0), at three weeks (W3), and at twelve weeks, prior to surgery (W12). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations and design for each pt a tumor-informed, ctDNA assay tracking up to 1000 mutations to detect MRD. Detection limit was computed for each tested sample as previously described. For each sample assayed, we report tumor fraction (TFx) when MRD was detected and the detection limit at 90% power when MRD was not detected. Results. Of 139 study pts, 68 had complete tissue and plasma samples and no receipt of additional NAT. Of these, 22 were responders. These responders, and 22 matched non-responders were identified for analysis. Data from 22 pts – 11 responders, 11 non-responders - are described here; full analysis on all 44 pts will be presented at the meeting. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed targeting 434 to 1000 variants (median 1000) and applied to 66 plasma samples. At W0, 100% (22/22) were positive for ctDNA; 73% (16/22) and 55% (12/22) were positive at W3, and W12, respectively. In pts with T1-T2 tumors median TFx was 4.1e-3(7.8e-6, 3.4e-2) and 4.7e-1(4.3e-2, 9.0e-1) in pts with T3-T4 tumors. TFx decreased from W0 to W3 and from W0 to W12 in responders (Table 1). By W12, ctDNA had cleared in 7/8 pts with RCB 0, 1/3 with RCB 1, 2/8 with RCB 2, and 0/3 with RCB 3. Overall, ctDNA levels were broad with median TFx of 1.5e-3 (range 2.9e-6 to 0.90). Detection limit at 90% power for all tested samples was a median of 8.8e-6 (range 9.9e-7 to 6.8e-3). To investigate whether ctDNA persistence after NAT was associated with BC recurrence, we analyzed a separate group of all 8 pts with known recurrence and with complete data and samples. All pts had persistent ctDNA at W12 (median TFx 6.8e-3, [2.9e-6 to 6.6e-2]). Conclusions. After 3 weeks of NAT for eTNBC, ctDNA TFx decreased, with a 3900-fold change in responders and 18-fold change in non-responders. By W3, TFx for most pts with RCB 0/1 were below the 1 in 10,000 limit of detection for many currently available assays, emphasizing the need for sensitive tests to potentially guide therapy. Additional studies will determine if ctDNA-guided approaches in eTNBC can improve pt outcomes. Table 1: Tumer Fraction and Tumer Fraction Fold Change by Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Citation Format: Heather A. Parsons, Timothy Blewett, Xiangying Chu, Sainetra Sridhar, Katheryn Santos, Kan Xiong, Vandana Abramson, Ashka Patel, Ju Cheng, Adam M. Brufsky, Justin Rhoades, Jeremy Force, Ruolin Liu, Tiffany A. Traina, Lisa Carey, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ahmed Elkhanany, Vered Stearns, Jennifer M. Specht, Harold Burstein, Antonio C. Wolff, Eric Winer, Nabihah Tayob, Ian Krop, Todd Golub, Erica L. Mayer, Viktor Adalsteinsson. PD11-06 Circulating tumor DNA association with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy in triple negative breast cancer in TBCRC 030 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-06.

Background: DESTINY-Breast04 demonstrated that the HER2 targeting antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in pts in the hormone receptor−positive (HR+) cohort and all pts (HR+ and HR-; median PFS, 9.9 vs 5.1 months [mo], hazard ratio: 0.50; median OS, 23.4 vs 16.8 mo, hazard ratio: 0.64; both P < 0.0001; Modi et al. N Engl J Med 2022). Objective response rate (ORR) with T-DXd was ≥50% across cohorts. These subgroup analyses examine pt history and disease characteristics that may correlate with response to therapy. Methods: N = 557 pts with centrally confirmed HER2-low mBC were randomized 2:1 to T-DXd or TPC. Randomization was stratified by HER2 status (IHC 1+ vs 2+), 1 vs 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, and HR+ (with vs without prior treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor [CDK4/6i]) vs HR−. With the exception of the PFS and OS analyses by prior CDK4/6i use, all other described efficacy analyses were assessed post-hoc. Results: Benefit of T-DXd vs TPC was consistent in pts with or without prior CDK4/6i use (Table 1). Pts with high disease burden (ie, ≥3 metastatic sites) also benefited from T-DXd vs TPC (Table 2). There was a small subgroup (n = 22) among all pts (HR+ [n = 18] and HR− disease [n = 4]) with rapid progression prior to enrollment (disease progression within 6 mo of concluding a prior course of chemotherapy in early breast cancer). T-DXd showed responses in 7/14 (50%) pts in this subgroup vs 0/8 with TPC; this subgroup also had prolonged median PFS with T-DXd vs TPC (Table 3). Efficacy data for HER2 IHC 1+ vs 2+ and prior chemotherapy subgroups will be presented. Median OS was not reached for many subgroups (insufficient events in each group [data not shown]); however, subgroups in general showed OS benefit consistent with the primary analysis. With T-DXd, rates of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis were similar in pts with/without prior CDK4/6i use. Conclusions: T-DXd treatment for HER2-low mBC in the phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast04 showed consistent efficacy independent of disease burden, prior CDK4/6i treatment, or rapid progression status. ILD is an important identified risk and requires proactive monitoring and management. These data continue to support the use of T-DXd as the new standard of care across subgroups of pts with HER2-low mBC. Editorial Acknowledgment Under guidance of the authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Eileen McIver, PhD, and Soniya Patel, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo. Funding This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca. Table 1. Efficacy by Prior CDK4/6i Treatment in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, HR+ Cohort. Table 2. Efficacy by Disease Burdena in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, ITT. Table 3. Efficacy by Rapid Progressor Statusa in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, ITT. Citation Format: Nadia Harbeck, Shanu Modi, William Jacot, Toshinari Yamashita, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Maria Vidal, Junji Tsurutani, Naoto T. Ueno, Aleix Prat, Naoki Niikura, Binghe Xu, Hope Rugo, Konstantinos Papazisis, Javier Cortés, Ian Krop, Dhiraj Gambhire, Lotus Yung, Yibin Wang, Jasmeet Singh, David Cameron. Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from DESTINY-Breast04 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-01.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (safety analysis set)

Supplementary Table S1. Patient Demographics and Disease Characteristics. Supplementary Table S2. Treatment-Related Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher Observed in either Cycle 1 or Cycle greater than or equal to 2. Supplementary Table S3. Adverse Events in greater than or equal to 10% of Patients Regardless of Attribution. Supplementary Table S4. Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher Regardless of Attribution. Supplementary Figure S1. Trellis plot of individual and fitted tumor volumes to day 21 following treatment with taselisib (GDC-0032). Supplementary Figure S2. PI3K pathway suppression was evaluated in KPL-4 tumor xenografts following a single oral dose of 1, 5 and 25 mg/kg taselisib or MCT (0.5% methylcellulose/0.2% Tween-80) vehicle at the time points indicated. Supplementary Figure S3. Schematic showing the decision-making related to selection of recommended dose for future studies. Supplementary Figure S4. Mean plasma concentration vs. time following single dose on day 1 (A) and multiple dose on day 15 (B). Supplementary Figure S5. Duration of treatment of patients treated via PIK3CA mutation status and dose level. Supplementary Figure S6. Antitumor activity observed with taselisib treatment. Supplementary Figure S7. Example of patient with partial response upon taselisib treatment and changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria for cohort 2d (advanced HER2-expressing non-breast/non-gastric or HER2-mutant solid tumors)

Mutation type and confirmed response for 19 patients with HER2-mutated tumors

HER2-targeted therapies are approved only for HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. We assessed the safety/tolerability and activity of the novel HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in 60 patients with pretreated, HER2-expressing (IHC ≥ 1+), non-breast/non-gastric or HER2-mutant solid tumors from a phase I trial (NCT02564900). Most common (>50%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were nausea, decreased appetite, and vomiting. Two drug-related TEAEs were associated with fatal outcomes. The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 28.3% (17/60). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.8–11.1] months. In HER2-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ORR was 72.7% (8/11), and median PFS was 11.3 (95% CI, 8.1–14.3) months. Confirmed responses were observed in six tumor types, including HER2-expressing NSCLC, colorectal cancer, salivary gland cancer, biliary tract cancer, endometrial cancer, and HER2-mutant NSCLC and breast cancer. Results suggest T-DXd holds promise for HER2-expressing/mutant solid tumors.Significance:T-DXd demonstrated promising activity in a heterogeneous patient population with heavily pretreated HER2-expressing or HER2-mutant solid tumors, especially HER2-mutant NSCLC. The safety profile was generally acceptable. Interstitial lung disease can be severe and requires prompt monitoring and intervention. Further research of T-DXd is warranted to address these unmet medical needs.See related commentary by Rolfo and Russo, p. 643.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 627

Interstitial lung disease monitoring and management

Application of MRD testing to healthy donor cfDNA samples. Patient specific panels designed for 14 different patients were pooled together and applied to cfDNA collected from four different healthy donors. Reported are the number of sites where ctDNA was detected. We required at least two sites to call a sample MRD+.

Verification of detection power calculation. Comparison between the predicted detection power of 18 replicates and the actual fraction of those replicates that were called MRD+. 18 independent samples from a 1:100k dilution were probed with a 488 SNV panel (see methods). Replicates had their duplex consensus reads downsampled in increments of 10% and detection power was recalculated. Reported are the median and range of predicted detection powers for all replicates at each downsampling.

PDF file - 46K, Patient Level Data. This table tabulates chemotherapy cycles received, response and DLT per patient.

Early stage breast cancer cohort. (A) Overview of subtype distribution of cohort as well as the timing of blood draws relative to surgery and treatment. (B) REMARK diagram of the early stage breast cancer cohort. (C) Distribution of the number of mutations tracked for each patient.

Purpose:Existing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methods lack the sensitivity needed for detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) following therapy. We developed a test for tracking hundreds of patient-specific mutations to detect MRD with a 1,000-fold lower error rate than conventional sequencing.Experimental Design:We compared the sensitivity of our approach to digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in a dilution series, then retrospectively identified two cohorts of patients who had undergone prospective plasma sampling and clinical data collection: 16 patients with ER+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC) sampled within 6 months following metastatic diagnosis and 142 patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer who received curative-intent treatment with most sampled at surgery and 1 year postoperative. We performed whole-exome sequencing of tumors and designed individualized MRD tests, which we applied to serial cfDNA samples.Results:Our approach was 100-fold more sensitive than ddPCR when tracking 488 mutations, but most patients had fewer identifiable tumor mutations to track in cfDNA (median = 57; range = 2–346). Clinical sensitivity was 81% (n = 13/16) in newly diagnosed MBC, 23% (n = 7/30) at postoperative and 19% (n = 6/32) at 1 year in early-stage disease, and highest in patients with the most tumor mutations available to track. MRD detection at 1 year was strongly associated with distant recurrence [HR = 20.8; 95% confidence interval, 7.3–58.9]. Median lead time from first positive sample to recurrence was 18.9 months (range = 3.4–39.2 months).Conclusions:Tracking large numbers of individualized tumor mutations in cfDNA can improve MRD detection, but its sensitivity is driven by the number of tumor mutations available to track.

Purpose: Accumulating evidence supports the existence of breast cancer stem cells (BCSC), which are characterized by their capacity to self-renew and divide indefinitely and resistance to conventional therapies. The Notch pathway is important for stem cell renewal and is a potential target for BCSC-directed therapy.Experimental Design: Using human breast tumorgraft studies, we evaluated the impact of gamma secretase inhibitors (GSI) on the BCSC population and the efficacy of combining GSI with docetaxel treatment. The mouse experimental therapy paralleled a concurrent clinical trial in patients with advanced breast cancer, designed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of the GSI, MK-0752, administered sequentially with docetaxel, and to evaluate BCSC markers in serial tumor biopsies.Results: Treatment with GSI reduced BCSCs in MC1 and BCM-2147 tumorgrafts by inhibition of the Notch pathway. GSI enhanced the efficacy of docetaxel in preclinical studies. In the clinical trial, 30 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with escalating doses of MK-0752 plus docetaxel. Clinically, meaningful doses of both drugs were possible with manageable toxicity and preliminary evidence of efficacy. A decrease in CD44+/CD24−, ALDH+, and mammosphere-forming efficiency were observed in tumors of patients undergoing serial biopsies.Conclusions: These preclinical data show that pharmacologic inhibition of the Notch pathway can reduce BCSCs in breast tumorgraft models. The clinical trial shows feasibility of combination GSI and chemotherapy, and together these results encourage further study of Notch pathway inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 19(6); 1512–24. ©2012 AACR.

Overview schematic of MRD assay. MRD assay workflow from characterizing a primary tumor to determining if a blood draw contains evidence of residual disease.

Protocol 12 Supplement File

Validation of tumor fraction confidence interval and effects of biological variability on tumor fraction inference. (A) Confidence intervals inferred from simulated data were aggregated into coverage probability for each condition and compared against theoretical coverage probability of 95% (see Methods). (B) Biological variability of clonal evolution loss was simulated by removing tumor evidence from a fraction of the fingerprint panel. Tumor fraction was calculated for simulated and original samples for comparison.

Patients who experienced local recurrence only after treatment for early stage breast cancer. cfDNA time points for all patients who experienced local recurrence only. End points represent time of last follow up or death.

Characteristics of TBCRC023 Patients with disease progression

Purpose:To determine whether the androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, enzalutamide, improves effectiveness of endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer.Patients and Methods:In this phase II trial, patients with HR+/HER2 normal advanced/metastatic breast cancer were randomized 1:1 to exemestane 25 mg with placebo or exemestane 50 mg with enzalutamide 160 mg daily (NCT02007512). Two parallel cohorts enrolled patients with 0 (cohort 1) or 1 (cohort 2) prior ET for advanced disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population of each cohort. Biomarkers were evaluated in an exploratory analysis.Results:Overall, 247 patients were randomized (cohort 1, n = 127 and cohort 2, n = 120). PFS was not improved in either cohort of the ITT population [HR, 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54–1.26); P = 0.3631 for cohort 1 and HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.66–1.59); P = 0.9212 for cohort 2]. In cohort 1, high levels of AR mRNA were associated with greater benefit of enzalutamide (Pinteraction = 0.0048). This effect was particularly apparent in patients with both high levels of AR mRNA and low levels of ESR1 mRNA [HR, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.10–0.60); P = 0.0011]. The most common any grade adverse events in the enzalutamide arms were nausea (39%) in cohort 1 and fatigue (37%) in cohort 2.Conclusions:Enzalutamide with exemestane was well tolerated. While PFS was not improved by the addition of enzalutamide to exemestane in an unselected population, ET-naïve patients with high AR mRNA levels, particularly in combination with low ESR1 mRNA levels, may benefit from enzalutamide with exemestane.

Purpose:Prior neoadjuvant trials with 12 weeks of dual anti-HER2 therapy without chemotherapy demonstrated a meaningful pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. In this trial, we sought to determine whether longer treatment would increase the rate of pCR.Patients and Methods:TBCRC023 (NCT00999804) is a randomized phase II trial combining a Simon phase II design in the experimental arm with a pick-the-winner design, not powered for direct comparison. Women with HER2-positive breast tumors measuring ≥2 cm (median = 5 cm) were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to 12 versus 24 weeks of lapatinib and trastuzumab. Letrozole (along with ovarian suppression if premenopausal) was administered in patients whose tumors were also estrogen receptor (ER) positive. All evaluable patients were assessed for in-breast pCR.Results:Ninety-seven patients were enrolled (33 in 12-week arm and 64 in 24-week arm), of whom 94 were evaluable. Median age was 51 years, and 55% were postmenopausal. Median tumor size was 5 cm, and 65% were ER-positive. The rate of pCR in the 24-week arm was 28% and numerically superior to the 12-week arm (12%). This was driven by increased pCR in the ER-positive subgroup (33% vs. 9%). Study treatment was well tolerated, with grade 1–2 diarrhea and acneiform rash being the most common toxicities.Conclusions:Treatment with dual anti-HER2 therapy for 24 weeks led to a numeric increase in pCR rate in women with HER2-positive breast cancer, without using chemotherapy. If validated, this approach may help identify patients who may benefit from deescalation of therapy.

Plasma trough concentrations by week for (A) enzalutamide and (B) exemestane The labeled values denote mean (SD). The open circles denote trough concentration values of individual patients. Solid squares and vertical lines denote mean with error bars by one SD in both directions. Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

Supplementary Methods

Purpose: Therapeutic nanoparticles are designed to deliver their drug payloads through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) in solid tumors. The extent of EPR and its variability in human tumors is highly debated and has been proposed as an explanation for variable responses to therapeutic nanoparticles in clinical studies.Experimental Design: We assessed the EPR effect in patients using a 64Cu-labeled nanoparticle, 64Cu-MM-302 (64Cu-labeled HER2-targeted PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin), and imaging by PET/CT. Nineteen patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer underwent 2 to 3 PET/CT scans postadministration of 64Cu-MM-302 as part of a clinical trial of MM-302 plus trastuzumab with and without cyclophosphamide (NCT01304797).Results: Significant background uptake of 64Cu-MM-302 was observed in liver and spleen. Tumor accumulation of 64Cu-MM-302 at 24 to 48 hours varied 35-fold (0.52–18.5 %ID/kg), including deposition in bone and brain lesions, and was independent of systemic plasma exposure. Computational analysis quantified rates of deposition and washout, indicating peak liposome deposition at 24 to 48 hours. Patients were classified on the basis of 64Cu-MM-302 lesion deposition using a cut-off point that is comparable with a response threshold in preclinical studies. In a retrospective exploratory analysis of patient outcomes relating to drug levels in tumor lesions, high 64Cu-MM-302 deposition was associated with more favorable treatment outcomes (HR = 0.42).Conclusions: These findings provide important evidence and quantification of the EPR effect in human metastatic tumors and support imaging nanoparticle deposition in tumors as a potential means to identify patients well suited for treatment with therapeutic nanoparticles. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4190–202. ©2017 AACR.

PDF file - 39K, Probability of DLT. This table estimates the probability of dose-limiting toxicity by dose level

Supplementary Tables

Fig. S1. MM-302 tumor deposition in preclinical xenografts as a function of HER2 expression. Fig. S2. Preclinical assessment of minimum 64Cu-MM-302 tumor delivery for anti-tumor activity. Fig. S3. Maximum intensity projection images of selected patients with average and rapid clearance of 64Cu-MM-302. Fig. S4. Stability of 64Cu-MM-302 in patients. Fig. S5. Hepatic tumor lesion with similar uptake as normal liver tissue. Fig. S6. Estimated parameter values (k1, k-1, VVF) for lesions from 3 patients who underwent 3 scans. Table S1. Model parameters for tracer kinetic modeling of 64Cu-MM-302 liposome transport into and out of tumors. Table S2. Patient Demographic (n=19). Table S3. Radiation Dosimetry of 64Cu-MM-302 (n=11).

Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) testing for single mutation in dilution series. (A) The observed VAFs of HapMap serial dilutions measured by using a ddPCR assay for a single mutation (with three replicates) vs. the expected VAFs; (B) The representative ddPCR raw data and fluorescence intensity thresholds for determining positive or negative droplets.

Treatment discontinuation in TBCRC023 Patients

Technical performance of the MRD Assay. All samples from early stage breast cancer cohort. Includes plasma cfDNA and buffy coat gDNA samples. Samples from the same patient and probed with the same panel are represented independently. (A) On target fraction calculated from Picard CollectHsMetrics and using pct_selected_bases. (B) Coefficient of variation of duplex fragment depth across fingerprint sites. (C) Fold 80 base penalty score for duplex fragment depth across fingerprint sites. (D, E) Error rate comparison between conventional sequencing (requiring Q20 base quality and removing duplicate fragments) and our duplex sequencing with added filters (see methods). (F) Fraction of total duplexes after downsampling raw reads. We considered a sample to be saturated if it still contained at least 95% of its duplexes after downsampling to 80% of its raw reads.

AIM: The APHINITY trial showed that adding adjuvant pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab and chemotherapy, compared with adding placebo (Pla), significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) for patients with HER2+ early breast cancer both overall and for the node-positive (N+) cohort. We explored whether adding P could benefit some N- subpopulations and whether to consider de-escalation for some N+ subpopulations.METHODS: Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) is an exploratory, graphical method that plots estimates of treatment effect for overlapping patient subpopulations defined by a covariate of interest. We used STEPP to estimate Kaplan-Meier differences in 6-year IDFS percentages (P minus Pla: Δ ± standard error [SE]), both overall and by nodal status, for overlapping subpopulations defined by (1) a clinical composite risk score, (2) tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) percentage, and (3) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) FISH copy number. Because of multiplicity, a Δ of at least three SE is required to warrant attention.RESULTS: The average absolute gains in 6-year IDFS percentages were 2.8 ± 0.9 overall; 4.5 ± 1.2 for N+ and 0.1 ± 1.1 for N-. Largest gains were for patients with intermediate clinical composite risk (5.3 ± 1.9 overall; 6.9 ± 2.3 N+; 4.0 ± 3.0 N-), highest TILs percentage (6.3 ± 1.7 overall; 7.4 ± 2.4 N+; 3.2 ± 1.7 N-), and intermediate HER2 copy number (2.8 ± 1.9 overall; 7.4 ± 2.5 N+; -1.3 ± 1.9 N-), but clear evidence indicating a pattern of differential subpopulation treatment effects was lacking.CONCLUSIONS: STEPP plots for N- did not identify subpopulations clearly benefiting from adding P, and those for N+ did not identify subpopulations warranting de-escalation. TILs percentage appeared to be more predictive of P treatment effect than clinical composite risk score.TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01358877.

Background Tucatinib is an oral, reversible, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor highly selective for HER2 with minimal inhibition of the human epidermal growth factor receptor. Tucatinib is approved in the US for use in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, with and without brain metastases, who have received 1 or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a HER2-directed monoclonal antibody conjugated to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, is approved in the US for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer who have received 2 or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. In HER2+ breast cancer xenograft models, tucatinib increased the antitumor activity of a HER2-directed ADC comprising a HER2-directed monoclonal antibody conjugated with 8 exatecan moieties (T-Ex) when compared to T-Ex alone (Kulukian, et al. (2019). Abstract P1-18-09. Proceedings of San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 10-14, 2019). While significant advances have been made in the treatment of patients with HER2+ breast cancer, treatment of metastatic disease remains a clinical challenge for which options are limited, particularly in patients with brain metastases. The HER2CLIMB-04 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of tucatinib in combination with T-DXd in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer following progression on 2 or more HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting. Trial Design HER2CLIMB-04 (NCT04539938) is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study of tucatinib in combination with T-DXd in previously treated patients aged ≥18 years with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. Patients with brain metastases, including active brain metastases, may be enrolled. A safety lead-in portion of the study will enroll 10 patients who will be followed for at least 1 cycle. If tucatinib combined with T-DXd has a manageable safety profile, the trial will enroll approximately 60 response-evaluable patients (including the 10 patients from the safety lead-in), approximately evenly distributed between patients with and without brain metastases. The primary endpoint is confirmed objective response rate (cORR) by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR) by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1, OS, and safety. Exploratory endpoints will include cORR, PFS, DCR, and DoR by independent central review per RECIST 1.1, pharmacokinetic analyses, biomarker analyses, and changes in patient-reported outcomes using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument. Efficacy and safety will be summarized with descriptive endpoints to describe continuous variables. For response rates, the 2-sided exact confidence interval using the Clopper-Pearson method will be calculated. Enrollment began in late 2020 at approximately 30 study sites in the US. Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Lisa Carey, Jorge Ramos, Yiyi Chen, Ian Krop. HER2CLIMB-04: phase 2 trial of tucatinib + trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2+ locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with and without brain metastases (trial in progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-13-01.

Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is unresectable at presentation, thus neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAS) is the primary treatment for this aggressive disease. Eribulin (E) (Eisai Co., Ltd) is a synthetic analog of Halichondroin B that suppresses microtubule growth. Its properties of inducing a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition and normalizing the vasculature of mammary tumors are particularly relevant to IBC. Pre-clinical data revealed changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters after exposure to E, thought to reflect tumor vasculature remodeling. We sought to examine the efficacy of E-containing NAS specifically for patients (pts) with HER2- IBC. We also characterized changes in breast DCE-MRI and diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) between baseline and 1 week (wk) after NAS. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed HER2- IBC received 4 cycles of E 1.4 mg/m2 day (D)1, D8 every 21 D followed by 4 cycles of dose-dense (dd) doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide (C) 600mg/m2 every 2 wk followed by modified radical mastectomy (MRM) + postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) on a phase II prospective study (Cohort A). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) defined as no invasive disease in breast + axillary lymph nodes. Based on a Simon 2-stage design, if ≥ 2 of 16 pts had pCR then enrollment would continue to 25, with the regimen worthy of study if pCR ≥ 0.30 and not if pCR ≤ 0.10 (α=0.10, β=0.10). A second cohort was opened, changing the NAS sequence to ddAC followed by E (Cohort B). All pts had 2 research breast biopsies (rbx) for genomic analysis at baseline and 1 wk after first dose of NAS. An imaging study evaluated breast DCE-MRI and DWI at baseline and 1 wk after first dose of NAS. Tofts 2-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) model calculated Ktrans, Ve, Kep, and iAUC from DCE. ADC was calculated from DWI. The change in Ktrans, Ve, Kep, iAUC, and ADC between baseline and wk 1 was evaluated using a signed-rank test. The magnitude of these changes was compared between Cohort A and Cohort B using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All testing was two-tailed and exact p-values were used; p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: 22 pts were enrolled, 16 pts in Cohort A and 6 pts in Cohort B before the study was closed due to slow accrual. Median age was 58 years, 3 pts (13.6%) had triple negative disease. 13 pts (59%) were postmenopausal. All but 1 had stage III disease. All 22 pts completed NAS followed by MRM + PMRT. 19 pts completed full course of NAS, 1 pt received E followed by 3 cycles of AC and 2 pts received 3 cycles of E in addition to 4 cycles of AC. In Cohort A, 1/16 pts had pCR (6.3%; 80% CI 0,22.2%). At a median follow up of 51 months, 3 pts had distant disease recurrence with 1 death; no local-regional recurrence. 7 pts experienced grade (gd) 3 or 4 adverse event (AE); most common were neutropenia and aminotransferase increase. 10 pts participated in the DCE-MRI and DWI substudy: 5 from Cohort A, 5 from Cohort B. Decrease in value from baseline to wk 1 was detected in Ktrans (median -49), Ve (-128), and iAUC (-57). The magnitude of changes was not different when comparing Cohort A to Cohort B. There was no significant change in Kep or ADC. Given the small size of each group, a lack of statistical significance should not be interpreted as suggestive of no effect. Evaluation of changes in angiogenesis- and EMT-related gene expression in rbx + residual disease is ongoing.Conclusion: A regimen of E + ddAC is tolerable NAS for HER2- IBC. All pts underwent curative surgery despite low pCR rate, commonly observed in ER+ IBC. There were changes in some DCE-MRI parameters after exposure to chemotherapy but may not be specific to E. Studies specifically designed for IBC are needed to enhance the understanding of this disease. Clinical trial: NCT02623972 Citation Format: Filipa Lynce, Eren D. Yeh, Meredith M. Regan, Lei Qin, Camden P. Bay, Ian Krop, Beth T Harrison, Faina Nakhlis, Jennifer Bellon, Beth Overmoyer. A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant systemic therapy with eribulin followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-18.

Background: Despite the success of multiple HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ breast cancer (BC), resistance remains a challenge and novel therapies are needed. DHES0815A is a THIOMABTM antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a humanized IgG1 anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) conjugated to the DNA alkylating agent PBD-MA. The reduced potency of PBD-MA compared to PBD dimers and the stability of the conjugation site and linker were designed to improve tolerability, whereas the binding of the mAb to a HER2 epitope distinct from trastuzumab and pertuzumab was designed to enable combination therapy with existing HER2 therapies. Methods: This first-in-human, Phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose escalation study used a 3+3 dose escalation design to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary anti-tumor activity of DHES0815A in patients with metastatic HER2-positive BC refractory to established therapies (NCT03451162). DHES0815A (0.6-6.0 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Results: A total of 14 patients were treated with DHES0815A; all had ≥3 prior lines of therapy. Thirteen patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (43%), adverse events (AE; [29%]) symptomatic deterioration (14%) or other (7%); 1 patient remains on treatment. DHES0815A was initially well-tolerated for doses up to 2.4 mg/kg. At 4.0 mg/kg and 6.0 mg/kg, the first dose was also well-tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities, however, following 3 or more cycles at 4.0 mg/kg or 2 or more cycles at 6.0 mg/kg, safety events involving skin, eyes, and lung emerged. Skin events were reported in 50% of patients (all doses) and related events occurring in n≥2 patients included pruritus (36%), rash (36%), and skin hyperpigmentation (21%). Ocular toxicities were reported in 57% and related events occurring in n≥2 patients included photophobia (21%), conjunctivitis, eye pain, and dry eye (each 14%). Lung toxicities were reported in 36% of patients; events occurring in n≥2 included pneumonitis (14%). Other related skin, ocular, and pulmonary events occurring in 1 patient (7%) included palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, macular rash, blurred vision, eyelid edema, periorbital edema, blepharitis, punctate keratitis, wheezing, allergic rhinitis, and pneumothorax. Most events were grade 1 or 2 although 3 patients experienced grade 3 ocular events (blepharitis, eye pain, photophobia). Due to these AEs, DHES0815A dose was decreased to 2.4 mg/kg Q3W for all enrolled patients and accrual was stopped. All 5 patients receiving doses of 4.0 mg/kg and 6.0 mg/kg discontinued due to AEs. At lower doses, 1 patient receiving 2.4 mg/kg developed grade 2 rash at Cycle 21 and 1 patient receiving 1.2 mg/kg developed grade 1 rash, pruritis, and skin hyperpigmentation between Cycles 28-30. Nonlinear PK of antibody-conjugated PBD-MA (acPBD-MA) was observed due to target mediated drug disposition at 0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 mg/kg; PK approached linear at 4.0 mg/kg. Minimal systemic exposure of unconjugated PBD-MA was observed. Overall, 1 patient (7%) in the 1.2 mg/kg cohort achieved a confirmed complete response. As of 10Jun21, this patient remains on study after more than 32 months on treatment. Ten patients (86%) showed a confirmed best overall response of stable disease (86%). Conclusion: Despite some anti-tumor activity observed with DHES0815A, development in HER2-positive BC has been discontinued due to safety concerns and the narrow therapeutic window. Toxicities observed in skin, lung, and eyes are clinically apparent only after repeated dose administration. If future exploration of PBD-MA-based constructs is performed in the clinic, close monitoring for delayed toxicities is warranted. Citation Format: Ian Krop, Erika Hamilton, Kyung Hae Jung, Shanu Modi, Kevin M Kalinsky, Gail Phillips, Rong Shi, Sharareh Monemi, Michael Mamounas, Ola Saad, Voleak Choeurng, Renee Commerford, Eunpi Cho, Alexander Ungewickell, Patricia LoRusso. A phase I dose-escalation study of DHES0815A, a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with a DNA monoalkylator payload, in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-25.

Background: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody conjugated to a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a stable tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Preliminary results from the phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 study demonstrate that Dato-DXd has encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Meric-Bernstam, ASCO 2021) and those with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (Bardia, ESMO BC 2021). Updated results from the TNBC cohort are presented here. Methods: TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) is a phase 1, multi-center, open-label, 2-part study evaluating Dato-DXd in previously treated patients with solid tumors. Based on the dose-escalation results in patients with NSCLC, Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks is being evaluated in patients with advanced/metastatic TNBC and HR+/HER2− breast cancer who relapsed/progressed on standard therapies. Two patients with TNBC received Dato-DXd 8 mg/kg prior to selection of 6 mg/kg for dose expansion. Safety and efficacy were assessed, including objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Results: As of the April 6, 2021, data cutoff, 43 patients with TNBC had received ≥1 dose of Dato-DXd, with 27 patients (63%) continuing and 16 patients (37%) discontinuing treatment all due to disease progression. The median age was 53 years (range, 32-82 years). Forty-one patients (95%) had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy; 19 patients (44%) had received prior immunotherapy and 7 (16%) had received prior sacituzumab govitecan. The median duration of treatment was 2.8 months (range, 0.7-6.9 months). The median follow-up was 3.9 months (range, 0.3-9.2 months). Among 38 patients evaluable for response, the ORR by BICR was 39% (15 partial responses [PR]), with 12 confirmed and 3 pending confirmation. The disease control rate was 84% (32/38). The median time to response was 1.35 months (1.2-3.2 months) for the 12 confirmed PRs. All-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; any grade, grade ≥3) were observed in 95% and 35% of patients, respectively; 2 events were grade 4 and 0 grade 5. The most common TEAEs (any grade [≥30%], grade ≥3) included nausea (58%, 0%), stomatitis (53%, 9%), alopecia (35%, N/A), vomiting (35%, 2%), and fatigue (33%, 7%). One patient had grade 3 decreased neutrophil count; no cases of grade ≥3 diarrhea were observed. No cases of treatment-related interstitial lung disease as adjudicated by an independent committee were reported. Serious TEAEs were observed in 5 patients (12%); no TEAEs were associated with death. Dose reductions occurred in 9 patients due to stomatitis, fatigue, mucosal inflammation, dry eye, retinal exudates, and blurred vision (multiple counts per TEAE). Three patients had dose interruptions due to stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, bronchitis, and musculoskeletal chest pain. No patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Conclusions: Preliminary results showed that Dato-DXd demonstrates promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic TNBC; confirmatory studies in patients with breast cancer are warranted. Citation Format: Ian Krop, Dejan Juric, Toshio Shimizu, Anthony Tolcher, Alexander Spira, Toru Mukohara, Aaron E. Lisberg, Takahiro Kogawa, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos, Erika Hamilton, Senthil Damodaran, Jonathan Greenberg, Wen Gu, Fumiaki Kobayashi, Ferdinand Guevara, Takahiro Jikoh, Yui Kawasaki, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Aditya Bardia. Datopotamab deruxtecan in advanced/metastatic HER2- breast cancer: Results from the phase 1 TROPION-PanTumor01 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-05.

Background: DAPHNe was a prospective trial designed to assess adherence to de-escalated antibody doublet therapy in the adjuvant setting among HER2+ breast cancer patients experiencing a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant taxol (T), trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), were collected from all patients at baseline and after THP completion. The goal of this study was to determine if a patient’s peripheral blood immune profile at baseline, or the longitudinal change with treatment, could predict response to THP. Methods: Blood samples were subjected to high dimensional (28-30 parameter) flow cytometry with comprehensive T- and NK-cell panels. A fully automated computational analysis strategy was undertaken consisting of unsupervised clustering of the high dimensional data into groups of cells with similar immunophenotypic signatures. Clustering was performed using 2 algorithms: Fingerprint-based clustering (Fluster) and High Throughput Mapper (HiTMapper). Clusters were tested using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for correlation with the clinical response. Responders were those with pCR (=residual cancer burden [RCB] 0) or RCB 1; non-responders were those with RCB 2/3 disease. P values were adjusted with the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control for FDR. In addition to P values, effect size was evaluated using the nonparametric Cliff’s Delta measure. An effect was determined to be large if the magnitude of Delta was >0.4 which corresponded to one cohort coming ahead 70% of the time. In addition, groups of clusters were evaluated using multivariate statistical modeling or dimensionality reduction to determine if there was an association with pCR. Results: Matched baseline and pre-op PBMC were available to perform the NK panel in 66 patients and the T cell panel in 40. In both groups 70% were responders and 30% were non-responders. No cluster produced by Fluster or HiTMapper differed significantly between responders and non-responders however, in the T cell panel, several clusters had a large effect size (table) suggesting the clusters are good at differentiating some, responders from non-responders. Both algorithms agreed that the median responder has more CD4 naïve and CD8 naïve cells than the median non-responder. While no individual cluster differed significantly between responders and non-responders, cross-validated logistic regression analyses showed that 2 clusters, activated CD4 central memory clusters, and activated CD4 naïve clusters, predicted responder status with AUC of 0.70 and 0.68 respectively. Numerous clusters showed robust and significant longitudinal changes between baseline and pre-op samples. Stratifying longitudinal changes by response status revealed no significant differences between responders and non-responders, however evaluation of effect size suggested a naïve CD4 cluster that increased in non-responders and decreased in responders. The latter could be explained as naïve T cells acquiring a memory phenotype in response to treatment in responders. Conclusion: High dimensional flow cytometry suggested a potential role for monitoring several T cell subsets to predict response in HER2+ patients receiving THP. Additional analyses to include cyTOF evaluation of PBMCs are ongoing to further characterize the peripheral immune profile of these HER2+ patients. T cell clusters with high effect sizeMajor PhenotypeOther markersMethodp-valueeffect sizeCD4 CM.actCD38, CD226HiTMapper0.351-0.469CD4 Naive.act.2CD38, CD226HiTMAPPER0.4-0.413CD4 Naive.act.4CD226HiTMapper0.351-0.490CD4 Naive.act.5CD38HiTMapper0.351-0.524CD8 Naive 1CD226HiTMapper0.396-0.427CD3 Neg-Fluster0.3190.476CD3 Neg3CD45RA, CD185, CD197Fluster0.3190.476CD3 Neg4CD45RA, Eomes,tBETFluster0.4240.413CD4 Naive-Fluster0.319-0.517CD8 Naive1-Fluster0.319-0.469Unassigned 20 (CD4)CD45RA, CD27-, CD28-Fluster0.364-0.441 Citation Format: Esther R Ogayo, Adrienne Waks, Wade Rogers, Matei Ionita, Kenechukwu Adigwe, Jillian Alberti, Sapana Kadel, Jonni Moore, Tari King, Ian Krop, Sara Tolaney, Eric Winer, Jennifer Guerriero, Elizabeth Mittendorf. High dimensional flow cytometric analysis or the peripheral immune profile and response to HER2-targeted antibody therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-15.